Next Article in Journal
Low Levels of Omega-3 Long-Chain Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Are Associated with Bone Metastasis Formation in Premenopausal Women with Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanisms Underlying the Skin-Gut Cross Talk in the Development of IgE-Mediated Food Allergy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Scores (DIAAS) of Six Cooked Chinese Pulses

1
Academy of National Food and Strategic Reserves Administration (Former Name: Academy of State Administration of Grain), Beijing 100037, China
2
Riddet Institute, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
3
State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2020, 12(12), 3831; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12123831
Submission received: 20 November 2020 / Revised: 9 December 2020 / Accepted: 10 December 2020 / Published: 15 December 2020

Abstract

:
Values for the digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) of a protein are based on true ileal amino acid (AA) digestibility values obtained in adult humans or in the growing pig as an animal model. An experiment was conducted using growing pigs to determine the true ileal digestibility (TID) values of AA in six cooked Chinese pulses (kidney bean, mung bean, adzuki bean, broad beans, peas and chickpeas). Each pulse was included in a diet as the only source of crude protein (CP). An N-free diet was given to allow determination of gut endogenous AA losses. Seven growing pigs each fitted with a T-cannula at the terminal ileum were allotted to a 7 by 6 incomplete Latin square with seven diets and six 7-d periods. The true digestibility values % for the total indispensable AA were higher (p < 0.001) for broad beans (87.3 ± 2.98) and lower (p < 0.001) for kidney bean (73.3 ± 4.84) than for the other pulses. For the older child (over 3 years), adolescent and adult, the DIAAS (%) was 88 for kidney bean, 86 for mung bean, 76 for chickpeas, 68 for peas, 64 for adzuki bean and 60 for broad beans.

1. Introduction

The common pulse comprises many different varieties and is the largest legume crop with an annual production of over 31 million tons worldwide [1]. Of the pulses, the kidney bean, mung bean, adzuki bean, peas and chickpeas are the most commonly consumed in China [2]. Pulses are generally characterized as rich sources of complex carbohydrates, vitamins and minerals, including folate, potassium and iron, in addition to having low lipid content [3,4]. They also contain significant amounts of protein (22–30% by weight) and are important plant-based sources of protein [5]. Especially in developing regions, cereal grains and pulses are often the main component of the human diet, and provide a large proportion of the dietary protein intake [6], with pulses providing proportionally more protein than the cereals. In comparison with cereal grains, pulses have higher protein contents. Generally, consumers are showing an increased interest in plant-based sources of protein, but accurate data on their digestible amino acid compositions is sparse.
An accurate assessment of the dietary protein quality and amino acid (AA) digestibility of food products are important [7,8], and the digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) has been endorsed by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations as the preferred method for determining protein nutritional quality [9,10]. A current barrier to the widespread use of DIAAS, however, is the limited amount of published data available for the true ileal AA digestibility of human foods [10] and especially for foods in developing regions of the world. Ileal amino acid digestibility refers to measurement of digestibility at the end of the small intestine and replaces the less accurate measure of fecal digestibility [11] while true digestibility denotes that the digestibility measure has been corrected for the potentially confounding endogenous amino acids found in ileal digesta [12]. To calculate DIAAS, it is necessary to determine the true ileal digestibility (TID) of each AA, which is preferably determined in humans, however, if this is not possible, the growing pig is a suitable animal model for protein digestion in the adult human [9,13]. The physiology of protein digestion to the end of the small intestine is similar between the adult human and growing pig [14] and the growing pig model has been shown to give true ileal amino acid digestibility values not statistically significantly different from those determined in the adult human [15]. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to determine the apparent and true ileal AA digestibility values and DIAAS values of six cooked pulses commonly consumed in China using the growing pig as an animal model for protein digestibility in the adult human. The novelty of the present study is that true ileal amino acid digestibility was determined in pulses, prepared as for human consumption.

2. Materials and Methods

The animal use protocols were reviewed and approved by the China Agricultural University Animal Care Committee (AW07040202-1, Beijing, China). All procedures were performed strictly according to the Guide for Experimental Animals of the Ministry of Science and Technology (Beijing, China).

2.1. Sample Procurement and Preparation

Kidney bean, mung bean, adzuki bean, broad beans, peas and chickpeas were sourced for the study. Kidney bean (Variety name: Xiyun No.2) and mung bean (Variety name: Yulv No.1) were purchased from the Shanxi Province. Adzuki bean (Variety name: Jihong No.16), broad beans (Variety name: Qingcan No.14), peas (Variety name: Dingwan No.4) and chickpeas (Variety name: Xinying No1 Y2-12) were purchased from Hebei, Qinghai, Gansu and Xingjiang Provinces, respectively. The cooking mimicked the common method of cooking pulses for human consumption, used in China. All of the ingredients were washed and soaked for 12 h with 25 °C deionized water, and then cooked in added water (20% of dry weight of raw pulses) for 70 min using a commercially available cooker (passing 100 °C steam). All the cooked materials were dried (hot air circulation) and ground through a 2 mm mesh prior to use in the experimental diets (Table 1).

2.2. Animals Experiment and Diets

Each pulse was included in a diet as the sole source of crude protein (CP) and AA such that the diets were iso-nitrogenous based on tabulated CP contents of the ingredients (Table 2). An N-free diet was used to determine the basal ileal endogenous N losses. Vitamins and minerals were included in all diets to meet or exceed current requirement estimates for growing pigs [16]. Titanium dioxide was included in all diets (0.3%) as an indigestible marker for calculating the ileal digestibility of AA [17].
Seven growing pigs (castrated boars, (Duroc × Landrace) × Yorkshire; initial body weight: 33.7 ± 1.44 kg) each fitted with a T-cannula at the terminal ileum according to the method of Stein et al. [18] were allotted to a 7 by 6 incomplete Latin square with seven diets (6 pulses and protein-free) and six 7-d periods [19]. No pig received the same diet more than once during the study and there were, therefore, six independent replicates per diet. The growing pig was adopted as an animal model for protein digestion in the adult human. All pigs were individually housed in stainless-steel metabolism crates (1.4 m by 0.9 m by 0.7 m) with adjustable sides in an environmentally controlled metabolism room (22 °C ± 2.5 °C and 12 h of light and 12 h of dark). Humidity varied from 55% to 65% during the experiment. A feeder and a nipple drinker were installed in each pen. After 14 d of recovery from surgery for implantation of the T-cannulas, pigs were fed the experimental diets. At the end of the study, pigs had a body weight of 47.5 ± 3.16 kg.
The experimental diets were given to the pigs at a level of 8% of metabolic body weight (BW0.75) (kg) in 2 equal meals daily (07:30 h and 16:30 h). The amount of food supplied to each pig was recorded for each period. After an adaptation period of 5 days for each diet, ileal digesta were collected for 9 h daily (from 08:00 to 17:00 h) on days 6 and 7. The digesta collection lasted for 9 h daily beginning at 08:00 h according to the protocol described by Stein et al. [18]. Plastic bags were attached to the barrel of the cannulas and removed whenever they were filled with digesta and immediately stored at −20 °C to prevent bacterial degradation of the AA in the digesta. At the end of the experiment, digesta samples were thawed, mixed by pig and period, sub-sampled and lyophilized in a vacuum-freeze dryer (Tofflon Freezing Drying Systems, Minhang District, Shanghai, China). All pigs had ad libitum access to water via a drinking nipple [17].

2.3. Chemical Analysis

Before chemical analysis, ingredient, diet and digesta samples were ground through a 1-mm screen and mixed thoroughly. Ingredient, diet and ileal digesta samples were analyzed for AA (AOAC method 982.30 E [a, b, c]) [20]. For methionine and cysteine the samples were subjected to cold performic acid oxidation overnight and then hydrolyzed with 7.5 N HCl at 110 °C for 24 h before AA determination. Tryptophan was determined after hydrolyzing the sample with LiOH for 22 h at a constant temperature of 110 °C. The concentration of titanium in the diets and ileal digesta samples was determined using the method described by Short et al. [21]. All analyses were conducted in duplicate. Dry matter (DM) and CP were determined according to standard methods GB/T 6435-2014 [22] and GB/T 6432-2018 [23].

2.4. Data Analysis

The endogenous ileal AA flows were determined for pigs fed the protein-free diet [24,25,26].
Apparent and true ileal AA digestibility values were calculated using the following equations (units are g/kg DMI) [25,26]:
AIDAA (%) = 100 − ((AAdigesta/AAdiet) × (Tidiet/Tidigesta)) × 100
where AIDAA is the apparent ileal digestibility of AA, AAdigesta is the concentration of AA in the ileal digesta DM, AAdiet is the concentration of AA in the diet DM, Tidiet is the concentration of Ti in the diet DM and Tidigesta is the concentration of Ti in the ileal digesta DM.
TIDAA = AID + ((IAAend/AAdiet) × 100)
where IAAend is the ileal endogenous AA losses.
DIAA reference ratios were calculated.
DIAA reference ratio
=   mg   of   the   digestible   dietary   indispensable   AA   in   1   g   of   the   test   protein mg   of   the   dietary   indispensable   AA   in   1   g   of   the   reference   protein
Three indispensable amino acid reference requirement profiles were chosen for calculation of DIAAS: Birth to 6 months, 0.5 to 3 year-old-child and the older child, adolescent and adult profile [9].
DIAAS was calculated using the following equation [9,16]:
DIAAS (%) = 100 × lowest value of the DIAA reference ratio

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed using the Proc GLM model of SAS 9.4 statistical software. The pig was the experimental unit, and pig and period were random effects and diet was the fixed effect. LSMEANS were calculated. Statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences in amino acid digestibility among diets were determined using orthogonal contrasts.

3. Results

3.1. CP and AA Compositions of the Six Cooked Pulses

All pigs remained healthy throughout the study and readily consumed the diets. The total gross AA concentrations of the six cooked pulses on an as-fed basis ranged from 18.4% (adzuki bean) to 25.4% (broad beans; Table 3). The gross CP contents of the cooked pulses on an as-fed basis ranged from 24.3% (peas) to 29.7% (broad beans). Compared with the other indispensable AA, all cooked pulses contained relatively high amounts of leucine and lysine and low amounts of tryptophan and methionine.

3.2. Mean Apparent Ileal Digestibility (AID) of CP and AA in the Six Cooked Pulses

The AID of CP in broad beans and peas were greater (p < 0.001) than that in kidney bean, mung bean and adzuki bean (Table 4). The mean AID of the indispensable AA in broad beans, adzuki bean and peas was greater (p < 0.001) than that in kidney bean and mung bean. The AID values of most AAs in broad beans were not different (p > 0.05) from those in peas, except that the AID of serine in broad beans was greater than that in peas (p < 0.001). The AID values of most AAs in broad beans were not different (p > 0.05) from those in adzuki bean, except that the AID of cysteine and arginine in broad beans was greater than that in adzuki bean (p < 0.001). The mean AID of the indispensable AA in kidney bean were the lowest (p < 0.001) among the values obtained for all of the cooked pulses. The mean AID of methionine and tryptophan were not significantly different (p > 0.05) among the pulses.

3.3. Mean TID of CP and AA in the Six Cooked Pulses

The TID of CP in peas was greater (p < 0.001) than that in kidney bean, mung bean and adzuki bean (Table 5). The mean TID of indispensable AA in broad beans and peas were greater than the values for kidney bean and mung bean (p < 0.001). No difference (p > 0.05) was observed in the mean TID of most AAs between broad beans, adzuki bean and peas, except that the TID of cysteine in broad beans and peas was greater than that for adzuki bean (p < 0.001), and the TID of histidine in adzuki bean was greater than that for peas (p < 0.001). The mean TID of methionine was not different (p > 0.045) among the pulses.

3.4. DIAAS for the Six Cooked Pulses

For children (6 months to 3 years), the most limiting AA in cooked kidney bean, mung bean, broad beans, peas and chickpeas was lysine, and in cooked adzuki bean was leucine, though lysine was closely second-limiting. The DIAAS values (%) were: 77 for kidney bean, 68 for mung bean, 67 for chickpeas, 59 for adzuki bean, 57 for peas and 53 for broad beans. For older children, adolescents and adults, the most limiting AA in cooked kidney bean, peas and chickpeas was lysine, and in cooked mung bean, adzuki bean and broad beans was leucine. The DIAAS values (%) were: 88 for kidney bean, 86 for mung bean, 76 for chickpeas, 68 for peas, 64 for adzuki bean and 60 for broad beans (Table 6).
The most limiting AA (the AA having the lowest ratio of dietary content to the required amount, reference protein) in the six cooked pulses was different according to the reference indispensable amino acid profile chosen for calculation of DIAAS. The DIAAS values were also different.

4. Discussion

According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) [27], a pulse is a legume that is exclusively harvested for the dry grain and therefore excludes legumes such as peanuts and soybeans, which are harvested primarily for their oil. Pulses are also sometimes referred to as grain legumes or pulse grains. The published literature often refers to pulses as including kidney bean, mung bean, adzuki bean, broad beans, peas, chickpeas, cowpeas, hyacinth bean and lentils. The pulses are the major sources of dietary fiber, minerals and vitamins for many individuals, and have the potential to meet 10–20% of the recommended daily amount of certain nutrients for adults [4,5,28,29]. Additionally, they contain significant amounts of protein (22–24% by weight) and reflect important plant-based sources of this macronutrient [4,5,28,29]. In 2017, the world area of harvested beans, was 36.5 million ha, and the production of dry beans was 31.4 million tons. The production share of beans (dry by region) was: Asia 49.3%, Americas 25.2% and Africa 21.8%. Among them, India’s output is the first (6.4 million tons) and China’s is the fourth (1.3 million tons) [1]. China has both temperate and subtropical zones and pulses comprise an important part of the agricultural production of China [2].
Broad beans (Vicia faba L.), adzuki bean (Vigna angularis Ohwi & Ohashi), mung bean (Vigna radiate L.) and kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) are all mainly distributed in Asia [1,2]. China ranks first, first, second and third in the production of broad beans, adzuki bean, mung bean and kidney bean in the world [1,2]. The annual production of them in China is about 1.8 million, 1 million, 0.4 million and 0.8 million tons, respectively [1,2]. Peas (Pisum sativum L.) are mainly cultivated in Canada, the Russian Federation and China [1]. Chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) are mainly cultivated in India [1]. All these pulses are widely consumed in China. Their production also plays an important part in the west semi-arid and arid areas of China. Recent investigations show that the consumption of pulses is beneficial, as they reduce the risk of acquiring chronic diseases [30,31,32,33,34]. Pulses often provide a high proportion of the dietary protein for humans especially in developing countries [6].
An accurate assessment of the dietary protein quality and amino acid digestibility of food products is necessary [7]. DIAAS has been recommended by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations as the preferred method for determining protein nutritional quality [9,10]. To calculate DIAAS, it is necessary to determine the true ileal digestibility of each AA, which is preferably determined in humans, but if this is not possible, TID can be determined in the growing pig [13,35]. The growing pig model provides a method that allows TID to be determined in foods routinely.
AA digestibility determination at the terminal ileum is more accurate than the traditional total tract (fecal) method [35]. Although ileal digestibility may not be a perfect measure to determine net amino acid absorption, it is considerably better than the amino acid digestibility determined over the total digestive tract [36]. Dietary protein evaluation can be improved by determining the TID values of AA where TID values have been corrected for the influence of the basal gut endogenous losses [25].
In different physiological and age stages, the amounts of amino acids required daily are different. Based on the recommended amino acid scoring patterns for infants, children, older children, adolescents and adults given in the Report of the most recent FAO Expert Consultation [17], the amino acids required in the highest amounts are leucine (96 mg/g protein requirement) and then the aromatic AA (phenylalanine + tyrosine) (94 mg/g protein requirement) for infants, leucine (66 and 61 mg/g protein requirement) and lysine (57 and 48 mg/g protein requirement) for children and older children, adolescents and adults, respectively.
The most limiting AA in all six cooked pulses differed according to which amino acid reference profile was used. As expected, the DIAAS values were also different. The presently determined DIAAS values for cooked pulses ranged from 36% for broad beans to 53% for mung beans (birth to 0.5-year-old infants reference pattern), from 53% for broad beans to 77% for kidney beans (0.5 to 3-year-old child reference pattern) and from 60 for broad beans to 88% for kidney beans (older children, adolescents and adults reference pattern) (Table 6). The DIAAS values for the infant were particularly low, though it is recognized that pulses are unlikely to be sole foods for this grouping.
For children aged 0.5 to 3-year-old, the DIAAS values of cooked broad beans, peas and chickpeas were similar to values reported previously [4,5]. Kidney beans, however, had a higher DIAAS value than that previously published [4]. In addition, the first limiting amino acid, determining the DIAAS value, was different from previous reports [4,5,29]. The first limiting amino acid determining the DIAAS value of adzuki beans was demonstrated to be leucine, while for the other pulses in the present study the first-limiting AA was lysine. In previously reported studies the first-limiting AA was methionine + cysteine. Variation in DIAAS values may be a result of differences in the animal model used, analytical differences especially for the sulfur AA’s, the means of cooking the beans, or factors such as processing, bean variety, growing conditions of the pulses and the presence of anti-nutritional factors in the pulses [4,5,29].
Based on the cut-off value for DIAAS from the Report of the FAO Expert Consultation [9], the cooked kidney beans, mung beans and chickpeas are considered “good” protein sources for human consumption because their DIAAS is 88%, 86% and 76% (based on older children, adolescents and adults reference pattern). However, based on the 0.5 to 3-year-old child reference pattern, only kidney beans would be considered a “good” protein source.
From the current research and previous reports [4,5,29,37,38], it is concluded that the range of DIAAS values for pulses according to recommended amino acid scoring patterns for children (0.5 to 3-year-old) [9] is generally 55–83%, which is lower than that for animal proteins [9,24,25,37], but higher than that for cereal proteins [8,9,24,25,26,37,38]. The DIAAS value of animal proteins is generally higher than 90% [9,24,25,37]. However, most of the DIAAS values for cereal proteins are less than 55% [8,9,24,25,26,37,38]. Only in the work of Cervantes–Pahm et al. [26] were higher DIAAS values of 77% and 64% observed for dehulled oats and polished white rice, respectively. In the Han et al. [8] report, the DIAAS value of buckwheat was 68%. A novel aspect of the present work is that the materials were evaluated in their cooked form, as eaten by Chinese people. Cooking may alter nutritional quality.
In China, the main consumers of these cooked pulses are not infants or children aged 0.5 to 3-year-old, but older children, adolescents and adults. Currently, Dietary Guidelines for Chinese Residents recommend 250–400 g of cereal and potato-based foods per day, including 50–150 g of whole grains and edible beans. High-quality animal protein is often accompanied by high amounts of animal fat, while pulses have high-quality protein and a low amount of oil. For this reason, pulses are a good dietary choice. At the same time, when pulses are the main source of dietary energy and protein, protein complementation may be needed. Judicious combinations of pulses, cereals and relatively small amounts of other high-quality proteins can be used to maximize the supply of utilizable protein.

5. Conclusions

DIAAS values obtained for cooked Chinese pulses provide comprehensive nutritional information and a scientific basis for the evaluation of the nutritional values of proteins contained in different diets. The data from this study will enrich the global database of DIAAS [39], and particularly for foods relevant to Asia. The DIAAS values can be used to formulate balanced diets for humans, and inform a rational complementation of cereal proteins with pulses.

Author Contributions

F.H. designed the study, conducted most of the experiments, analysed the data and the results and wrote the manuscript. P.J.M. revised the manuscript. J.L. conducted the animal experiment. S.P. prepared diet ingredients. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Special Funds of Basic Research of Central Public Welfare Institute (No. ZX1731) and the Ministry of finance project “Construction and operation of basic database of grain industry and science and technology service platform”.

Acknowledgments

The author thanks the Animal Welfare Committee of China Agricultural University (Beijing, China) for animal experiment and technical support. The authors also thank Yan Chai and Jingfeng Gao, Agricultural College of Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, for their assistance in providing the experimental materials used for experiments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

DIAASdigestible indispensable amino acid score
AAAmino acid
CPcrude protein
TIDtrue ileal digestibility
TIDAAtrue ileal digestibility of AA
AIDapparent ileal digestibility
AIDAAapparent ileal digestibility of AA
DMDry matter
DMIDry matter intake
FAOFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
SAASulphur amino acids
AAAaromatic amino acids
HisHistidine
IleIsoleucine
LeuLeucine
LysLysine
MetMethionine
CysCystine
PhePhenylalanine
TyrTyrosine
ThrThreonine
TrpTryptophan
ValValine
AlaAlanine
AspAspartic acid
Arg Arginine
Glu Glutamic acid
GlyGlycine
SerSerine

References

  1. FAOSTAT. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home (accessed on 26 December 2019).
  2. Lin, R.; Chan, Y.; Liao, Q.; Sun, S. Minor Grain Crops in China; China Agricultural Science and Technology Press: Beijing, China, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mitchell, D.C.; Lawrence, F.R.; Hartman, T.J.; Curran, J.M. Consumption of drybeans, peas, and lentils could improve diet quality in the US population. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2009, 109, 909–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Nosworthy, M.G.; Medina, G.; Franczyk, A.J.; Neufeld, J.; Appah, P.; Utioh, A.; Frohlich, P.; House, J.D. Effect of processing on the in vitro and in vivo protein quality of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris and Vicia faba). Nutrients 2018, 10, 671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Nosworthy, M.G.; Neufeld, J.; Frohlich, P.; Young, G.; Malcolmson, L.; House, J.D. Determination of the protein quality of cooked Canadian pulses. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 5, 896–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Bwibo, N.O.; Neumann, C.G. The need for animal source foods by Kenyan children. J. Nutr. 2003, 133, 3936S–3940S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Moughan, P.J. Dietary protein for human health (Preface). Br. J. Nutr. 2012, 108, S1–S2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Han, F.; Han, F.; Wang, Y.; Fan, L.; Song, G.; Chen, X.; Jiang, P.; Miao, H.; Han, Y. Digestible indispensable amino acid scores of nine cooked cereal grains. Brit. J. Nutr. 2019, 121, 30–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. FAO/WHO. Dietary Protein Quality Evaluation in Human Nutrition Report of an FAO Expert Consultation; Food and Nutrition Paper No. 92; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, The World Health Organization: Rome, Italy, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  10. Loveday, S.M. Food proteins: Technological, nutritional, and sustainability attributes of traditional and emerging proteins. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 10, 311–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Moughan, P.J.; Wolfe, R.R. Determination of dietary amino acid digestibility in humans. J. Nutr. 2019, 149, 2101–2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Moughan, P.J.; Rutherfurd, S.M. Gut luminal endogenous protein: Implications for the determination of ileal amino acid digestibility in humans. Brit. J. Nut. 2012, 108, S258–S263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Wolfe, R.R.; Rutherfurd, S.M.; Kim, I.Y.; Moughan, P.J. Protein quality as determined by the Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score: Evaluation of factors underlying the calculation. Nutr. Rev. 2016, 74, 584–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Moughan, P.J.; Cranwell, P.D.; Darragh, A.J.; Rowan, A.M. The domestic pig as a model for studying digestion in humans. In Digestive Physiology in the Pig; Souffrant, W.B., Hagemeister, H., Eds.; Forschungsinstitut fur die Biologie Landwirtschaftlicher Nutztiere (FBN): Dummerstorf-Rostock, Germany, 1994; Volume II, p. 8. [Google Scholar]
  15. Rowan, A.M.; Moughan, P.J.; Wilson, M.N.; Maher, K.; Tasman-Jones, C. Comparison of the ileal and faecal digestibility of dietary amino acids in adult humans and evaluation of the pig as a model animal for digestion studies in man. Brit. J. Nutr. 1994, 71, 29–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. NRC. National Research Council Nutrient Requirements of Swine, 11th ed.; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  17. FAO. Research Approaches and Methods for Evaluating the Protein Quality of Human Foods: Report of a FAO Expert Working Group; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  18. Stein, H.H.; Shipley, C.F.; Easter, R.A. Technical note: A technique for inserting a T-cannula into the distal ileum of pregnant sows. J. Anim. Sci. 1998, 76, 1433–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Mathai, J.K.; Liu, Y.; Stein, H.H. Values for digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for some dairy and plant proteins may better describe protein quality than values calculated using the concept for protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores (PDCAAS). Brit. J. Nutr. 2017, 117, 490–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis; Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 18th ed.; Rev. 2; AOAC International: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  21. Short, F.J.; Gorton, P.; Wiseman, J.; Boorman, K.N. Determination of titanium dioxide added as an inert marker in chicken digestibility studies. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 1996, 59, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. National Standardization Administration. GB/T 6435-2014 Determination of Moisture in Feed (Implemented on 9 January 2015); National Standardization Administration: Beijing, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  23. National Standardization Administration. GB/T 6432-2018 Determination of Crude Protein in Feeds Kjeldahl Method (Implemented on 1 April 2019); National Standardization Administration: Beijing, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  24. Rutherfurd, S.M.; Cui, J.; Goroncy, A.K.; Moughan, P.J. Dietary protein structure affects endogenous ileal amino acids but not true ileal amino acid digestibility in growing male rats. J. Nutr. 2015, 145, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Stein, H.H.; Seve, B.; Fuller, M.F.; Moughan, P.J.; Lange, C.F.M. Invited review: Amino acid bioavailability and digestibility in pig feed ingredients: Terminology and application. J. Anim. Sci. 2007, 85, 172–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cervantes-Pahm, S.K.; Liu, Y.; Stein, H.H. Digestible indispensable amino acid score and digestible amino acids in eight cereal grains. Brit. J. Nutr. 2014, 111, 1663–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. FAO. Definition and Classification of Commodities, 4. Pulses and Derived Products. Available online: http://www.fao.org/WAICENT/faoinfo/economic/faodef04e.htm (accessed on 9 September 2010).
  28. Nosworthy, M.G.; Franczyk, A.; Zimoch-Korzycka, A.; Appah, P.; Utioh, A.; Neufeld, J.; House, J.D. Impact of processing on the protein quality of pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) & buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) flours and blends, as determined by in vitro and in vivo methodologies. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 3919–3925. [Google Scholar]
  29. Nosworthy, M.G.; Franczyk, A.; Medina, G.; Neufeld, J.; Appah, P.; Utioh, A.; Frohlich, P.; House, J.D. Effect of processing on the in Vitro and in Vivo protein quality of yellow and green split peas (Pisum sativum). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 7790–7796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. McCrory, M.A.; Hamaker, B.R.; Lovejoy, J.C.; Eichelsdoerfer, P.E. Pulse consumption, satiety, and weight management. Adv. Nutr. 2010, 1, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Rebello, C.J.; Greenway, F.L.; Finley, J.W. A review of the nutritional value of legumes and their effects on obesity and its related co-morbidities. Obes. Rev. 2014, 15, 392–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Jayalath, V.H.; De Souza, R.J.; Sievenpiper, J.L.; Ha, V.; Chiavaroli, L.; Mirrahimi, A.; Di Buono, M.; Bernstein, A.M.; Leiter, L.A.; Kris-Etherton, P.M.; et al. Effect of dietary pulses on blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled feeding trials. Am. J. Hyperten. 2014, 27, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Jenkins, D.J.A.; Kendall, C.W.C.; Augustin, L.S.A.; Mitchell, S.; Sahye-Pudaruth, S.; Lanco, M.S.; Chiavaroli, L.; Mirrahimi, A.; Ireland, C.; Bashyam, B. Effect of Legumes as Part of a Low Glycemic Index Diet on Glycemic Control and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Arch. Intern. Med. 2012, 172, 1653–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Sievenpiper, J.L.; Kendall, C.W.C.; Esfahani, A.; Wong, J.M.W.; Carleton, A.J.; Jiang, H.Y.; Bazinet, R.P.; Vidgen, E.; Jenkins, D.J.A. Effect of non-oil-seed pulses on glycaemic control: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled experimental trials in people with and without diabetes. Diabetologia 2009, 52, 1479–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Van der Wielen, N.; Moughan, P.J.; Mensink, M. Amino acid absorption in the large intestine of humans and porcine models. J. Nutr. 2017, 147, 1493–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Fuller, M. Determination of protein and amino acid digestibility in foods including implications of gut microbial amino acid synthesis. Brit. J. Nutr. 2012, 108, S238–S246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Marinangeli Christopher, P.F.; House, J.D. Potential impact of the digestible indispensable amino acid score as a measure of protein quality on dietary regulations and health. Nutr. Rev. 2017, 75, 658–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Abelilla, J.J.; Liu, Y.; Stein, H.H. Digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) and protein digestibility corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS) in oat protein concentrate measured in 20 to 30 kilogram pigs. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 410–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Moughan, P.J. Measuring Protein’s Punch: DIAAS is the New PDCAAS. World Food Ingred. 2019, 116–119. Available online: https://www.riddet.ac.nz/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Dietary-Protein-Quality-Paul-Moughan-Oct-Nov-The-World-of-Food-Ingredients.pdf (accessed on 9 September 2010).
Table 1. Ingredient composition of the experimental diets (g/100g as-fed basis).
Table 1. Ingredient composition of the experimental diets (g/100g as-fed basis).
CompositionKidney BeanMung BeanAdzuki BeanBroad BeansPeasChickpeasN-Free
Cooked Kidney bean36.8
Cooked mung bean 38.0
Cooked adzuki bean 41.9
Cooked broad Beans 31.2
Cooked peas 37.5
Cooked chickpeas 35.7
Corn starch42.241.037.247.941.543.378.0
Sucrose10.010.010.010.010.010.010.0
Corn oil5.05.05.05.05.05.05.0
Purified cellulose3.03.03.03.03.03.03.0
Calcium carbonate (limestone)0.40.30.60.50.30.30.2
Calcium monophosphate1.51.61.21.31.61.62.3
Sodium chloride0.30.30.30.30.30.30.3
Potassium carbonate 0.3
Magnesium oxide 0.1
Titanium dioxide0.30.30.30.30.30.30.3
Vitamin–micromineral Premix 0.50.50.50.50.50.50.5
Total100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0
The vitamin–micromineral premix provided the following quantities of vitamins and micro minerals per kg of complete diet: Vitamin A, 5514IU; vitamin D3, 2200IU; vitamin E, 64IU; vitamin K3, 2.2 mg; thiamin, 1.5 mg; riboflavin, 4 mg; pyridoxine, 3 mg; vitamin B12, 27.6 ug; D-pantothenic acid, 14 mg; niacin, 30 mg; folic acid, 0.7 mg; biotin, 44 ug; choline chloride, 400 mg; Cu, 100 mg as cupric sulfate pentahydrate; Fe, 100 mg as ferrous sulphate monohydrate; I, 0.3 mg as potassium iodide; Mn, 40 mg as manganese oxide; Se, 0.3 mg as sodium selenite; and Zn, 75 mg as zinc oxide.
Table 2. Protein and amino acid compositions 1 of the experimental diets.
Table 2. Protein and amino acid compositions 1 of the experimental diets.
ItemsDiets
Kidney BeanMung BeanAdzuki BeanBroad BeansPeasChickpeasN-Free
DM (%)92.092.392.490.890.890.489.4
Crude protein (%)9.799.999.929.579.389.180.44
Indispensable amino acids (%)
His0.350.330.360.300.290.290.02
Ile0.380.360.370.350.320.340.02
Leu1.081.031.060.990.900.920.04
Lys0.600.590.620.560.570.520.01
Met0.110.100.130.070.080.110.01
Cys0.220.150.240.210.240.250.02
Phe0.370.400.380.290.290.360.02
Tyr0.130.180.140.180.150.140.01
Thr0.370.290.310.320.300.290.01
Trp0.090.080.080.060.060.09-
Val0.460.440.440.400.370.360.03
Total4.163.954.133.733.573.670.19
Dispensable amino acids (%)
Ala0.400.380.380.390.360.360.02
Asp1.021.021.020.970.930.970.03
Arg0.460.570.550.870.780.760.01
Glu1.441.531.531.541.481.420.05
Gly0.350.330.340.370.360.330.01
Pro0.240.270.300.290.270.280.03
Ser0.520.420.440.420.380.400.01
Total4.434.524.564.854.564.520.16
Total amino acid (%)8.598.478.698.588.138.190.35
1 Determined, % as fed.
Table 3. Nutrient composition 1 of the pulses (as-fed basis).
Table 3. Nutrient composition 1 of the pulses (as-fed basis).
Ingredient
Kidney BeanMung BeanAdzuki BeanBroad BeansPeasChickpeas
DM (%)94.196.897.293.192.990.4
Crude protein (%)26.226.125.529.724.325.3
Ca (%)0.140.100.090.150.080.13
P (%)0.510.420.560.680.380.42
Indispensable amino acids (%)
His0.900.820.730.810.720.65
Ile1.081.010.771.050.900.84
Leu1.971.882.182.901.702.27
Lys1.681.651.321.681.581.31
Met0.270.330.310.210.210.31
Cys0.500.620.380.670.630.68
Phe1.381.440.780.830.780.89
Tyr0.620.520.400.580.440.38
Thr1.010.800.660.930.810.73
Trp0.250.240.220.210.200.22
Val1.251.180.921.140.980.86
Total10.910.58.6711.08.959.14
Dispensable amino acids (%)
Ala1.031.050.821.151.010.92
Asp2.952.762.182.942.612.37
Arg1.461.631.282.752.271.99
Glu3.804.163.194.423.883.50
Gly0.960.920.761.131.020.86
Pro0.670.760.620.840.730.71
Ser1.311.160.901.140.961.06
Total12.212.49.7514.412.511.4
Total amino acids (%)23.122.918.425.421.420.6
1 Determined values.
Table 4. Mean apparent ileal digestibility (AID) of crude protein (%) and amino acids (%) in the cooked pulses.
Table 4. Mean apparent ileal digestibility (AID) of crude protein (%) and amino acids (%) in the cooked pulses.
Kidney BeanMung BeanAdzuki BeanBroad BeansPeasChickpeasSEMp
Crude protein62.7 c68.9 bc66.4 bc72.3 a77.3 a72.7 ba2.03<0.001
Indispensable amino acids
His41.3 d52.0 dc74.1 a67.3 ba57.1 bc54.8 bcd3.85<0.001
Ile74.5 c77.4 c83.1 ba86.3 a82.2 ba79.0 bc1.31<0.001
Leu85.8 c87.6 bc91.0 a92.4 a89.6 ba87.0 bc0.83<0.001
Lys79.5 c82.0 c86.0 ab89.0 a86.8 ab83.0 bc1.11<0.001
Met76.474.776.871.778.379.01.760.078
Cys30.2 b32.7 b40.5 b53.7 a62.7 a65.3 a3.60<0.001
Phe73.2 b79.6 a84.9 a85.6 a81.5 a80.7 a1.48<0.001
Tyr49.1 c69.8 b75.8 ba81.6 a74.7 ba66.4 b2.45<0.001
Thr66.8 b66.8 b77.4 a80.3 a73.6 ba69.6 b1.91<0.001
Trp65.268.162.965.369.074.22.680.082
Val73.9 c76.1 bc82.5 a83.7 a79.2 ba75.3 bc1.51<0.001
Mean65.0 c69.7 b75.9 a77.9 a75.9 a74.0 ba1.58<0.001
Dispensable amino acids
Ala59.0 c61.6 c75.2 ba79.5 a72.3 ba67.9 bc2.65<0.001
Asp85.6 b87.5 b91.4 a93.0 a90.7 a90.5 a0.70<0.001
Arg79.2 d84.1 c89.1 b94.6 a93.0 a92.6 a1.34<0.001
Glu81.6 d84.3 dc88.7 ba91.5 a88.1 ba86.6 bc1.05<0.001
Gly26.7 b33.0 b63.4 a68.9 a57.6 a55.3 a6.27<0.001
Ser76.1 c75.9 c81.9 ba85.3 a80.1 bc77.7 bc1.38<0.001
Mean58.3 b63.5 b73.8 a79.1 a75.1 a72.8 a2.06<0.001
a,b,c,d Mean values (n = 6) in a row with different superscript letters are significantly different (p < 0.001).
Table 5. Mean true ileal digestibility (TID) of crude protein (%) and amino acids (%) in the cooked pulses.
Table 5. Mean true ileal digestibility (TID) of crude protein (%) and amino acids (%) in the cooked pulses.
Kidney BeanMung BeanAdzuki BeanBroad BeansPeasChickpeasSEMp
Crude protein76.0 c81.9 bc79.6 bc85.7 ba90.9 a86.6 ba2.03<0.001
Indispensable amino acids
His56.5 d68.1 c88.9 a84.9 ba75.2 bc72.6 bc3.85<0.001
Ile79.9 d83.0 dc88.6 ba92.0 a88.4 ba84.8 bc1.31<0.001
Leu88.7 c90.6 bc93.9 a95.5 a93.0 ba90.3 bc0.83<0.001
Lys83.6 d86.1 cd89.9 abc92.9 a91.0 ab87.6 bc1.11<0.001
Met84.283.183.483.388.586.71.760.186
Cys43.7 b53.0 b52.9 b67.8 a75.2 a76.9 a3.60<0.001
Phe77.8 c83.9 b89.4 ba91.4 a87.3 ba85.3 b1.48<0.001
Tyr59.1 c76.8 b85.1 ba88.5 a82.8 ba75.7 b2.45<0.001
Thr74.6 c76.9 bc86.6 a89.2 a83.1 ba79.4 bc1.91<0.001
Trp77.982.277.083.587.286.92.680.045
Val79.9 c82.8 bc89.2 a91.1 a87.1 ba83.4 bc1.51<0.001
Mean73.3 c78.8 b84.1 ab87.3 a85.3 a82.7 ba1.58<0.001
Dispensable amino acids
Ala70.3 d73.4 dc87.0 ba90.8 a84.4 ba80.1 bc2.65<0.001
Asp88.0 b89.9 b93.8 a95.4 a93.0 a92.8 a0.70<0.001
Arg84.0 c88.1 b93.1 a97.2 a96.1 a95.5 a1.14<0.001
Glu85.8 d88.2 dc92.6 ba95.4 a92.1 ba90.8 bc1.53<0.001
Gly47.1 b54.6 b84.3 a87.8 a76.9 a76.2 a6.27<0.001
Ser81.7 c82.7 c88.4 ba92.1 a87.5 ba84.8 bc1.38<0.001
Mean76.1 b79.5 b89.9 a93.1 a88.4 a88.7 a2.01<0.001
a,b,c,d Mean values (n = 6) in a row with different superscript letters are significantly different (p < 0.001). TID values were calculated by correcting the values of apparent ileal digestibility for the basal endogenous losses. Values used for the basal endogenous losses were as follows (g/kg DMI): Asp: 0.45; Ser: 0.27; Glu: 0.57; Gly: 0.67; His: 0.50; Arg: 0.21; Thr: 0.27; Ala: 0.42; Pro: 3.75; Cys: 0.28; Tyr: 0.12; Val: 0.28; Met: 0.08; Reactive-Lys: 0.22; Lys: 0.23; Ile: 0.19; Leu: 0.29; Phe: 0.16; and Trp: 0.11.
Table 6. Digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for the cooked pulses.
Table 6. Digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS) for the cooked pulses.
Kidney BeanMung BeanAdzuki BeanBroad BeansPeasChickpeas
DIAA ratio (infants (birth to 6 months))
His2.142.321.701.962.212.22
Ile0.580.550.440.410.450.55
Leu0.580.550.400.380.440.55
Lys0.610.610.500.430.480.53
SAA1.091.001.321.241.191.29
AAA0.500.530.370.360.410.49
Thr0.850.740.610.640.730.78
Trp0.600.570.600.530.470.59
Val0.730.720.550.540.600.67
DIAAS (%)50 (AAA)53 (AAA)37 (AAA)36 (AAA)41 (AAA)49 (AAA)
DIAA ratio (child (6 months to 3 years))
His2.252.431.792.052.322.33
Ile0.990.950.750.700.770.94
Leu0.850.790.590.550.640.81
Lys0.740.740.600.530.580.64
SAA1.331.221.611.511.461.57
AAA0.910.950.660.660.740.89
Thr1.211.050.860.911.031.10
Trp1.201.141.211.060.951.18
Val0.940.920.700.700.770.85
DIAAS (%)77 (Lys)68 (Lys)59 (Leu)53 (Lys)57 (Lys)67 (Lys)
DIAA ratio (older child, adolescent, adult)
His2.813.042.242.572.902.91
Ile1.051.020.800.750.821.00
Leu0.920.860.640.600.700.87
Lys0.880.880.710.620.680.76
SAA1.561.441.891.781.711.85
AAA1.151.210.840.840.941.13
Thr1.501.311.071.131.281.37
Trp1.551.471.551.371.221.52
Val1.010.990.750.750.820.92
DIAAS (%)88 (Lys)86 (Leu)64 (Leu)60 (Leu)68 (Lys)76 (Lys)
First limiting amino acid is given in brackets. SAA, Sulphur amino acids. AAA, aromatic amino acids.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Han, F.; Moughan, P.J.; Li, J.; Pang, S. Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Scores (DIAAS) of Six Cooked Chinese Pulses. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3831. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12123831

AMA Style

Han F, Moughan PJ, Li J, Pang S. Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Scores (DIAAS) of Six Cooked Chinese Pulses. Nutrients. 2020; 12(12):3831. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12123831

Chicago/Turabian Style

Han, Fei, Paul J. Moughan, Juntao Li, and Shaojie Pang. 2020. "Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Scores (DIAAS) of Six Cooked Chinese Pulses" Nutrients 12, no. 12: 3831. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12123831

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop