Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Promoting Fruit and Vegetable Consumption for Childhood Obesity Prevention
Previous Article in Journal
An Avocado Extract Enriched in Mannoheptulose Prevents the Negative Effects of a High-Fat Diet in Mice
Previous Article in Special Issue
Obesity, Sodium Homeostasis, and Arterial Hypertension in Children and Adolescents
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 14
Issue 1
10.3390/nu14010156
Review Report
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

An Attempt to Assess the Impact of Pandemic Restrictions on the Lifestyle, Diet, and Body Mass Index of Children with Endocrine Diseases—Preliminary Results

Nutrients 2022, 14(1), 156; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14010156
by Agnieszka Zachurzok 1,*,†, Małgorzata Wójcik 2,*,†, Aneta Gawlik 3, Jerzy B. Starzyk 2 and Artur Mazur 4,*,†
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Nutrients 2022, 14(1), 156; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14010156
Submission received: 12 November 2021 / Revised: 17 December 2021 / Accepted: 26 December 2021 / Published: 29 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Endocrine and Metabolic Effects of Nutrition in Children and Adolescents)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Very interesting manuscript. Indeed you studied an important  population. Attached are my comments. The comments pertaining to the validity of you assessment tool, suggestions for additional analyses and figures are my most crucial comments.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

see attached

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 2 Report

The present study tries to establish a relationship between the COVID-19 pandemic and the lifestyle habits of children and adolescents in Poland.

Abstract: OK.

Introduction: OK.

Materials and methods: From my point of view, the research is faulty since as an instrument for evaluating the variables, they use a questionnaire created by themselves, without being validated by any group of experts.

On the other hand, for anthropometric measurements they do not indicate the brand of the instruments used or their precision.

Results: the authors should explain a table and then insert it, not explain all the results and then put all the tables together.

Discussion: OK.

Conclusions: OK.

Informed Consent Statement: "Oral informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in 287 the study".  An informed consent must always be read and signed on paper. It cannot be oral.

References:  underlined in some references (23)

             

 

     

Author Response

see attached

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you for the detailed correction of the manuscript. You have fully respondent to all my comments. I think that the manuscript is much clearer now and I think that the readers of the journal will find it interesting.  

Reviewer 2 Report

I still think that first I should have validated the questionnaire that is used as an evaluation instrument. On this basis, a scientific article can never be accepted if the evaluation instrument has not been reviewed and accepted by the scientific community.
Back to TopTop