Next Article in Journal
Relationship between ENaC Regulators and SARS-CoV-2 Virus Receptor (ACE2) Expression in Cultured Adult Human Fungiform (HBO) Taste Cells
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Berry Consumption on Blood Pressure Regulation and Hypertension: An Overview of the Clinical Evidence
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The California Nutrition Incentive Program: Participants’ Perceptions and Associations with Produce Purchases, Consumption, and Food Security

Nutrients 2022, 14(13), 2699; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14132699
by Wendi Gosliner *, Sridharshi C. Hewawitharana, Ron Strochlic, Celeste Felix and Caroline Long
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Nutrients 2022, 14(13), 2699; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14132699
Submission received: 8 June 2022 / Accepted: 24 June 2022 / Published: 29 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Nutrition and Public Health)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The purpose of this study was to explore and describe associations of SNAP point-of-purchase financial incentive programs at farmers’, with produce purchase, consumption and food security outcomes.  The authors submitted a very well written manuscript for review.  The introduction was extensive and interesting.  The methods were clear, easy to follow, logical and sufficient for this purpose.  The results were presented in easy to understand table formats with sufficient information for the reader to interpret and apply.  The description and interpretation of the results in the text matched the information in the tables.  I especially appreciated the information presented in Table 4.  The Discussion was substantive and comparisons to relevant research was appreciated.  Limitations were described and not unexpected.  The section on Implications for Research and Practice was appreciated especially the focus on linking access to fresh produce to local growers/local food systems.  Thank you for allowing me to review this manuscript.  It was very well written and a pleasure to review.

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript reports, the results of the data collected in cross-sectional, interviewer-administered intercept sur-19 veys with 325 adult SNAP participants at six incentive program and five comparison farmers’ mar-20 kets and nine comparison supermarkets in California. 

The article is clear, well written and well structured and of great interest in terms of subject and method of investigation.

Back to TopTop