Next Article in Journal
Dietary Inulin Supplementation Affects Specific Plasmalogen Species in the Brain
Next Article in Special Issue
Developing a Sensitive Platform to Measure 5-Methyltetrahydrofolate in Subjects with MTHFR and PON1 Gene Polymorphisms
Previous Article in Journal
Docosahexaenoic Acid as the Bidirectional Biomarker of Dietary and Metabolic Risk Patterns in Chinese Children: A Comparison with Plasma and Erythrocyte
Previous Article in Special Issue
Absorption and Tissue Distribution of Folate Forms in Rats: Indications for Specific Folate Form Supplementation during Pregnancy
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Cerebral Folate Deficiency Syndrome: Early Diagnosis, Intervention and Treatment Strategies

Nutrients 2022, 14(15), 3096; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14153096
by Vincent Th. Ramaekers 1,* and Edward V. Quadros 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Nutrients 2022, 14(15), 3096; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14153096
Submission received: 20 June 2022 / Revised: 18 July 2022 / Accepted: 22 July 2022 / Published: 28 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Folate and Other B Vitamins in Brain Health and Disease)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

It is very interesting and significant review work on CFDS. It is well known that folate is key micronutrient for development of fetus. When maternal deficiency in folate during pregnancy, the risk of adverse birth outcomes such as NTDs or CHDs in offspring. CFDS could be another. There are some comments as following:

1.      Whether are there some information on epidemiology of CFDS now? if yes, it would be better to add them, which will be helpful to understand the epidemiological features of DFDS.

2.      In the part of “Causes of cerebral folate deficiency”, authors said that “systemic folate deficiency occurs frequently and is due to malnutrition with additional common deficiencies of iodine, iron, zinc and essential vitamins like vitamin A, D and B12”. It sounds little confusing. Dietary folate intake is key for maintaining body folate, especially for susceptible population as pregnant women. Maybe dietary malnutrition or inadequate dietary intake of foods rich in folate or vitamin Bs are better.

3.      Prevention of CFDS is possible according to current progress? saying something more about this issue.

Author Response

It is very interesting and significant review work on CFDS. It is well known that folate is key micronutrient for development of fetus. When maternal deficiency in folate during pregnancy, the risk of adverse birth outcomes such as NTDs or CHDs in offspring. CFDS could be another. There are some comments as following:

  1. Whether are there some information on epidemiology of CFDS now? if yes, it would be better to add them, which will be helpful to understand the epidemiological features of DFDS. Unfortunately, epidemiologic data on this disorder is scarce currently.
  2. In the part of “Causes of cerebral folate deficiency”, authors said that “systemic folate deficiency occurs frequently and is due to malnutrition with additional common deficiencies of iodine, iron, zinc and essential vitamins like vitamin A, D and B12”. It sounds little confusing. Dietary folate intake is key for maintaining body folate, especially for susceptible population as pregnant women. Maybe dietary malnutrition or inadequate dietary intake of foods rich in folate or vitamin Bs are better. The statement has been modified to refer only to folate deficiency.
  3. Prevention of CFDS is possible according to current progress? saying something more about this issue. Prevention of birth defects and CFDS are an objective going forward. A statement has been added in the final paragraph.

Reviewer 2 Report

This is a comprehensive review. There are some minor revisions that need to be completed. A number of figures have words underlined in red, is there a purpose for this? If not, can these lines be removed?

Could table 1 and 2 be revised so that they are more clear?

I think that the manuscript would benefit from a conclusion.

Author Response

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This is a comprehensive review. There are some minor revisions that need to be completed. A number of figures have words underlined in red, is there a purpose for this? If not, can these lines be removed? This is now corrected.

Could table 1 and 2 be revised so that they are more clear? We have attempted to simplify  the tables

I think that the manuscript would benefit from a conclusion. We have extended the concluding paragraph to include additional statements.

 

Back to TopTop