Managing Female Athlete Health: Auditing the Representation of Female versus Male Participants among Research in Supplements to Manage Diagnosed Micronutrient Issues
, Alannah K. A. McKay 1, Megan Kuikman 1, Kathryn E. Ackerman 2, Rachel Harris 3,4, Kirsty J. Elliott-Sale 5, Trent Stellingwerff 6,7 and Louise M. Burke 1
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Congratulations to the Authors for their method and result sections: these are well conducted and written
Only minor suggestions:
- pay attention to English grammar and syntax all over the manuscript
- try to shorten the Abstract and to make it more focused on the main aim and major results of your paper
- maybe also the title could be shorter and more focused
- about the use of supplements for MSK disease, I suggest the following reference (http://www.mltj.online/influence-of-supplements-and-drugs-used-for-the-treatment-of-musculoskeletal-disorders-on-adult-human-tendon-derived-stem-cells/)
- line 262-265 I think are superflous and could be deleted
Author Response
Please see attachment.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report
I reviewd a paper entitled "Managing female athlete health: Auditing the representation of female versus male participants among research in supplements to manage diagnosed micronutrient issues” by Smith ES et al.
I think that this review is a good idea, well written and with good methodology.
Author Response
Thank you for this review.
