Next Article in Journal
Sodium, Potassium and Iodine Intake in an Adult Population of Lithuania
Next Article in Special Issue
Holistic Integration of Omics Tools for Precision Nutrition in Health and Disease
Previous Article in Journal
The Combined Effects of Dietary Diversity and Frailty on Mortality in Older Taiwanese People
Previous Article in Special Issue
Vitamin B12 Regulates the Transcriptional, Metabolic, and Epigenetic Programing in Human Ileal Epithelial Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 14
Issue 18
10.3390/nu14183824
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mendelian Randomization Analysis of the Association of SOCS3 Methylation with Abdominal Obesity

by
Yuqian Li
1,2,
Xiaotian Liu
3,
Runqi Tu
3,
Jian Hou
3 and
Guihua Zhuang
1,*
1
Departmentof Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Centre, Xi’an 710061, China
2
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Science, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China
3
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2022, 14(18), 3824; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14183824
Submission received: 29 July 2022 / Revised: 6 September 2022 / Accepted: 13 September 2022 / Published: 16 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Epigenetic Biomarkers in Nutrigenomics and Metabolism)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study was conducted to evaluate the potential causality association of SOCS3 methylation with abdominal obesity using Mendelian randomization. A case–control study, including 1064 participants, was carried out on Chinese subjects aged 18 to 79. MethylTargetTM was used to detect the methylation level for each CpG site of SOCS3, and SNPscan® was applied to measure the single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping. The logistic regression was used to assess the relationship of SOCS3 methylation level and SNP genotyping with abdominal obesity. Three types of Mendelian randomization methods were implemented to examine the potential causality between SOCS3 methylation and obesity based on the SNP of SOCS3 as instrumental variables. SOCS3 methylation levels were inversely associated with abdominal obesity in five CpG sites (effect estimates ranged from 0.786 (Chr17:76356054) to 0.851 (Chr17:76356084)), and demonstrated positively association in 18 CpG sites (effect estimates ranged from 1.243 (Chr17:76354990) to 1.325 (Chr17:76355061)). The causal relationship between SOCS3 methylation and abdominal obesity was found using the maximum-likelihood method and Mendelian randomization method of penalized inverse variance weighted (MR-IVW), and the β values (95% CI) were 5.342 (0.215, 10.469) and 4.911 (0.259, 9.564), respectively. The causality was found between the SOCS3 methylation level and abdominal obesity in the Chinese population.

1. Introduction

Obesity, a chronic metabolic disease, has attracted increasing attention worldwide [1]. Especially abdominal obesity, characterized by abnormal accumulation of fat in the abdomen, is associated with increased prevalence of numerous chronic non-communicable diseases, such as diabetes and cardiovascular diseases [2]. Epidemiological evidence indicated that the global prevalence of obesity has increased rapidly, from 3% in 1975 to 11% in 2016 among men, and correspondingly from 6% to 15% among women [3]. Moreover, previous research showed that the abdominal obesity prevalence has exceeded 30% in the Spanish population (31.2% in the subjects aged 3 to 24 years and 33.4% in the adults aged 25 to 64 years, respectively) [4,5]. In addition, a cross-sectional study, including 441,306 participants, showed that the abdominal obesity prevalence was 29.1% (277.8 million) among Chinese adults [6]. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the mechanisms of the genes and epigenetics in abdominal obesity development to prevent and control abdominal obesity and its complications, as well as reduce the disease burden.
The development of abdominal obesity is closely related to acquiring behavioral factors. However, genetic and epigenetic factors are the prerequisite for the occurrence of obesity status, which determines whether an individual is at high risk of obesity. Previous evidence suggested that the suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS3) played an essential role in the regulation of energy metabolism homeostasis, which inhibited the activity of insulin and leptin (characteristic feature in human obesity) [7,8]. One study in the Northern European population pointed out that the association of SOCS3 methylation level with obesity was significantly inverse [9]. A study conducted in a community population in New Haven revealed that subjects with obesity had lower methylation levels of SOCS3 [10]. In addition, an epigenome-wide study in 1066 women from the Sister Study cohort revealed that the SOCS3 methylation level decreased by 0.05% with each one-unit increase in body mass index (BMI) [11]. The above research highlighted the necessity to explore the substantial role of SOCS3 methylation under abnormal metabolic conditions, such as abdominal obesity.
Waist circumference (WC) is a crucial driver of risk for cardiovascular disease [12], and evidence from Chinese adults found that the association of type 2 diabetes risk with changes in WC was more robust than that with changes in BMI [13]. In addition, a previous study showed that obesity-related health risk was explained by WC and not by BMI in 14,924 adult participants who took part in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [14], and the association of WC with T2DM was independent of BMI [13]. To date, studies involved in the association of SOCS3 methylation with abdominal obesity have been limited, especially those conducted to infer the etiology of this association in an observational study. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between SOCS3 methylation and abdominal obesity. Furthermore, we conducted Mendelian randomization studies to explore whether there was causality between SOCS3 methylation levels and abdominal obesity by using the SNP of SOCS3 as instrumental variables.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

The participants came from the Henan Rural Cohort Study, which was conducted from July 2015 to September 2017 in five countries of Henan province in central China, using a multi-stage cluster sampling method. The respondents in this cohort were local residents aged from 18 to 79 years old and had no serious psychosomatic diseases. Detailed information for the cohort study has been elaborated on elsewhere [15]. A total of 1067 participants were chosen from the baseline survey, and 1064 participants were included in final analyses, after excluding 3 subjects who had no methylation information. The current study was approved by the Life Science Ethics Committee of Zhengzhou University, and informed consent was signed by every subject before the survey began.

2.2. Data Collection and Laboratory Measurements

The basic information of the subjects was collected via in-person interviews, and the physical examination was conducted in strict accordance with the operating manual by trained investigators. Demographic characteristics included age, gender, education level (elementary school or below, junior high school or above), marital status (married/cohabiting, widowed/single/divorced/separation), and average monthly family income (CNY < 500, CNY 500~, and CNY ≥ 1000). Behavioral risk factors included smoking status (never, ever, and current smoking), drinking status (never, ever, and current drinking), and physical activity (divided into low, medium, and high groups according to the International Physical Activity Questionnaire); dietary habits included high-fat diet (livestock and poultry meat ≥ 75 g/day) and more vegetables and fruits intake (≥500 g/day). In addition, family history of diabetes was defined as having at least one immediate family member who ever had or was currently suffering from diabetes.
After fasting for over 8 h, 5.0 mL of non-anticoagulant venous blood and 10.0 mL of anticoagulant venous blood (EDTA-K2) were collected from the subjects. The whole blood was isolated from anticoagulant blood and was used to extract DNA.

2.3. Abdominal Obesity Assessment

Individuals with a WC ≥ 90 cm in men or ≥80 cm in women were defined as those with abdominal obesity, excluding pregnant women [16]. The non-abdominal obese group was defined as a WC < 90 cm in men and <80 cm in women. When measuring the WC, the subjects were asked to stand upright, with their abdomen relaxed, and normal breathing. The measuring tape was close to the skin at 1.0 cm above their navel while wearing light clothes. The reading was accurate to 0.1 cm. The WC was measured twice, and the mean was taken as the final measurement value.

2.4. DNA Methylation and Genotyping of SOCS3

DNA of the participant was isolated by using the Whole Blood Genomic DNA Medium extraction kit III (Bioteke Corporation, Beijing, China). Detection of the DNA methylation level of SOCS3 was accomplished by MethylTarget™ (Genesky Corporation, Shanghai, China). According to the previous study [17], the CpG site of the SOCS3 gene was chosen according to the following standards: (1) observed/expected ratio > 0.60; (2) percent C and G > 50.00%; (3) length > 200 bp. In this study, the methylation levels of four CpG regions (Chr17:76355136–76355350, Chr17:76356054-76356232, Chr17:76354927-76355115, and Chr17:76354582–76354763, which included 93 CpG sites) were detected. The methylation level of each CpG site was defined as the proportion of the methylated cytosines that accounted for the total tested cytosines [18]. Each tested CpG site was named as its genomic position. Genomic position can be described as the chromosomal location of each CpG site according to the assembly GRCh37/hg19.
The genotypes of SOCS3 were detected by the SNPscan™ Kit (Genesky Corporation, Shanghai, China). A total of six SNPs in SOCS3 were included in the study based on domestic and international references, combined with bioinformatics databases and HapMap databases (according to the criteria of R2 > 0.8 in linkage disequilibrium analyses and minimum allele frequency > 0.05 of SNP).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables were shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD), while the SOCS3 methylation level was expressed as medium ± interquartile range (IQR), and the differences between the abdominal obese group and the non-abdominal obese group were compared by Student’s t-test. Categorical variables were represented by frequency (percentage), and the differences between the two groups were compared using Pearson’s chi-square test. The Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) test was conducted for each SNP using a chi-square test among the controls. The logistic regression model was fitted to assess the effect estimates (odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI)) per IQR increase in SOCS3 methylation level on abdominal obesity. The adjusted potential confounding factors included age, gender, education levels, marital status, average monthly family income, smoking status, drinking status, physical activity, high-fat diet, and more vegetable and fruit intake. Moreover, the restricted cubic spline analysis was used to inquire into the non-linear dose-response relationship between SOCS3 methylation levels and abdominal obesity (knots located at the 25th, 50th and 75th percentiles of the SOCS3 methylation levels). In addition, the chi-square test was used to test the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium in the control group at each SNP to detect whether the population was representative [19]. The associations of SNP with abdominal obesity were evaluated by logistic regression models. Associations between SNP and methylation levels of SOCS3 were examined by univariate regression analyses. Furthermore, three Mendelian randomization methods, including maximum-likelihood method, Mendelian randomization method of penalized weighted median (MR-median) and Mendelian randomization method of penalized inverse variance weighted (MR-IVW), were used to explore the causal association between SOCS3 methylation levels and abdominal obesity. There were three assumptions of Mendelian randomization analysis, which were as follows: 1. the instrumental variable should be robustly associated with the exposure; 2. the instrumental variable should not be associated with confounding factors of the exposure-outcome association; 3. the instrumental variable should affect outcome merely through exposure, not via alternative pathways [20]. The latter two assumptions were called no horizontal pleiotropy of the instrumental variable, which could be detected by the Mendelian randomization of the Egger (MR-Egger) regression intercept [21]. Moreover, the Wald ratio was used to estimate the causal effect of DNA methylation (exposure, x) at SNP-related CpG sites on abdominal obesity (outcome, y) and the change in abdominal obesity per standard deviation (SD) increase in methylation, using the formula βY|G^/βX|G^ for each instrumental SNP (G), where βY|G^ is the SD change in abdominal obesity per copy of the effect allele of each SNP and where βX|G^ is the SD increase in methylation per copy of the effect allele of each SNP [22,23].
All statistical analyses were performed using the SAS 9.1 software package (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) and R software (version 3.6.1, R Development Core Team, Vienna, Austria), and p < 0.05 at two tails was considered statistically.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of Participants

Table 1 shows the basic characteristics of all subjects (471 subjects with and 593 subjects without abdominal obesity). The mean age (mean ± SD) was 58.70 ± 8.46 years and 60.17 ± 8.78 years in participants with abdominal obesity and without abdominal obesity, respectively (p < 0.05). In the abdominal obese population, women (70.7%) and those with moderate physical activity (48.0) accounted for a higher proportion. In addition, individuals with abdominal obesity tended to be non-smokers (80.5%). There were no statistical differences in the distribution of other variables between the abdominal obese group and the non-abdominal obese group.

3.2. Association of SOCS3 Methylation Levels with Abdominal Obesity

Methylation levels of 93 CpG sites of the SOCS3 gene were measured and evaluated. Table 2 represents the significant association between the methylation levels of 23 CpG sites and abdominal obesity (all p < 0.05), and Table S1 describes no statistical association of the other 70 CpG sites with abdominal obesity in the adjusted models. Of the 23 statistically significant methylation sites, the methylation levels of 5 CpG sites were inversely associated with abdominal obesity (Chr17:76356054, Chr17:76356084, Chr17:76356099, Chr17:76356178 and Chr17:76356190), and effect estimates (OR (95% CI)) were 0.786 (0.672, 0.919), 0.851 (0.732, 0.988), 0.838 (0.719, 0.976), 0.795 (0.679, 0.930) and 0.841 (0.721, 0.983), respectively. The methylation levels of the remaining 18 CpG sites in one CpG regions (Chr17:76354927-76355115) were positively associated with abdominal obesity, and effect estimates ranged from 1.243 (Chr17:76354990) to 1.325 (Chr17:76355061).
Table S2 and Figure S1 indicate the results of restrictive cubic spline analyses between 23 CpG sites and abdominal obesity. Except for the Chr17:76356054 site (p for the non-linear association test was 0.025), the dose–response relationships were linear between SOCS3 methylation levels (the remaining22 CpG sites) and abdominal obesity in the adjusted models (all p for the non-linear association tests were >0.05).

3.3. Effect Estimates between SNP of SOCS3 and Abdominal Obesity

Table 3 summarizes the associations between SNP of SOCS3 and abdominal obesity. The six SNPs were in accordance with the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (all p > 0.05). Rs9914220 was associated with abdominal obesity with each mutant allele increase, and the OR (95% CI) was 0.823 (0.686, 0.988). No significant associations were found between the other five SNPs of SOCS3 and abdominal obesity (all p > 0.05).

3.4. Causal Estimates of SOCS3 Methylation Level on Abdominal Obesity

The associations between the six SNPs and methylation levels of twenty-three CpG sites of SOCS3 were explored. Significant associations were only found between five SNPs (rs12953258, rs4969168, rs2280148, rs4969170, rs9914220) and methylation levels of twenty CpG sites of SOCS3 (Table S3). Combined with the results of Table 3, only four SNPs (rs12953258, rs4969168, rs2280148, rs4969170) and associated seventeen CpG sites (Chr17:76356084, Chr17:76356099, Chr17:76354963, Chr17:76354984, Chr17:76354990, Chr17:76355044, Chr17:76355061, Chr17:76355068, Chr17:76355089, Chr17:76355115, Chr17:76354927, Chr17:76354955, Chr17:76354965, Chr17:76355009, Chr17:76355014, Chr17:76355017 and Chr17:76355029) were included into the Mendelian randomization analyses. The MR-Egger intercept test indicated no horizontal pleiotropy (p = 0.726).
Table 4 indicates the results of the Mendelian randomization analyses by three methods for the causal estimates of SOCS3 methylation level on abdominal obesity. The effect estimates (β (95% CI)) on abdominal obesity were 5.342 (0.215, 10.469) and 4.911 (0.259, 9.564) using the maximum-likelihood method and MR-IVW method, respectively, while the corresponding effect was 5.117 (−1.356, 11.590) using the MR-median method. In addition, the Wald ratio of each CpG site is shown in the Table S5.

4. Discussion

The current research demonstrated that 5 CpG sites methylation levels of SOCS3 were inversely associated with abdominal obesity, and methylation levels of 18 CpG sites were positively associated with abdominal obesity. The dose–response relationships between SOCS3 methylation levels and abdominal obesity were linear. Furthermore, the Mendelian-randomization analyses indicated a causal association between SOCS3 methylation levels and abdominal obesity.
The evidence emphasized that DNA methylation within intergenic regions plays a potential role in inhibiting the genetic expression, and those occurring in CpG islands might stably silence gene expression [24]. An accumulating body of research has shown that DNA methylation was closely related to aberrant glucose metabolism and dysregulation lipid metabolism, which represents a central role in metabolic and cardiovascular disease [25,26,27]. In addition, previous studies have indicated that the SOCS3 methylation level was negatively linked to type 2 diabetes [17,28,29]. A case–control study in young women summarized that the methylation levels of cg18181703 in SOCS3 (chr17: 76354621) significantly differed between obesity and lean individuals (−0.245 (−0.332, −0.142), p <  0.05) [30]. Another study conducted on community volunteers (aged 18–50) also found that the methylation level of cg18181703 of SOCS3 was lower in the obese subjects (3.08 (2.04, 4.71)) [10]. Moreover, an epigenome-wide association study in an Arab population revealed that the methylation level of cg18181703 of SOCS3 was negatively associated with BMI [31].
Previous studies have focused on the relationship between the methylation level of cg18181703 SOCS3 and obesity. However, the reports on exploring the associations between SOCS3 methylation levels and abdominal obesity (defined by WC) are limited. The current study indicated significant differences in SOCS3 methylation levels between abdominal obese and non-abdominal obese subjects, and the associations of SOCS3 methylation levels with abdominal obesity were both positive and negative, which may be caused by the different status of DNA methylation at different sites in gene expression regulation. In general, the hyper-methylation level of CpG island cytosine in the gene promoter and its nearby region would silence gene expression, while the hypo-methylation level would reactivate the expression of silenced genes [32,33]. Meanwhile, hyper-methylation in the exon and intron regions (the gene body) may elevate gene expression [34,35,36].
The potential mechanisms responsible for the association of SOCS3 methylation levels with abdominal obesity may be elucidated by the following information. SOCS3, a key protein in many pathological events, such as diabetes and immune disorders, has emerged as the most essential regulator in the inhibition of the Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway among the SOCS family [37,38,39]. Moreover, when the body is suffering from metabolic abnormalities, such as obesity, SOCS3 is involved in the inhibition of inflammatory cytokines and crucial hormones linked to energy metabolism, such as insulin signaling and leptin [40]. However, SOCS3 methylation results in the lower expression level of SOCS3 [38]. Therefore, the hyper-methylation of SOCS3 in the gene promoter and its nearby region silences the inhibitory effect on leptin and insulin of SOCS3, whereas hyper-methylation in the gene body facilitates it to inhibit the activity of insulin and leptin, resulting in a high risk of obesity. In addition, evidence has suggested that the increased SOCS3 expression regulates insulin signaling by inhibiting phosphorylation of the insulin receptor substrate (IRS) [41]. More epidemiological studies are needed to further investigate the mechanisms of different methylation sites with metabolic diseases (abdominal obesity, etc.) to provide more relevant evidence in the future.
Several studies have estimated the relationship between SOCS3 methylation and obesity; however, considering the cross-sectional nature of those traditional observational studies, they could not determine the causal effect between risk factors and disease. However, in the current study, based on the four SNPs (rs12953258, rs2280148, rs4969168 and rs4969170) of SOCS3 as instrumental variables, the Mendelian randomization analyses found a causal association between methylation levels of SOCS3 and abdominal obesity, which suggested that the SOCS3 gene might play a role in the pathogenesis of abdominal obesity and could be potentially used as a marker for attenuated or aggressive disease in the Asian population. Mendelian randomization is an approach to exploring the observational causal association of modifiable risk factors with health outcomes by using genetic variants [42], in which reverse causality might be avoided due to the characteristics of randomly distributed genetic variants at conception [43]. In this study, the causal association between the methylation levels of SOCS3 and abdominal obesity was established and some novelty sites for the association were found. However, more studies are needed to interpret the causal association, due to the limitation of instrumental variables in determining causal estimates.
Several limitations in the study should be noted. The temporality between DNA methylation levels and abdominal obesity could not be ascertained due to the case–control nature of the current study. In addition, the association between SOCS3 methylation level and abdominal obesity was found only in the Chinese rural population, so caution should be taken when generalizing the findings to other populations. It is necessary to explore the relationship between DNA methylation of SOCS3 and abdominal obesity in multicenter studies.

5. Conclusions

The current study provided evidence in support of the causal associations of the SOCS3 methylation level with abdominal obesity in the Chinese rural population, which suggested that SOCS3 methylation might be potentially used as a marker for development of abdominal obesity.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu14183824/s1, Table S1: Relationship between SOCS3 methylation level of and abdominal obesity; Table S2: p values for the overall and the non-linear association test for SOCS3 methylation level with abdominal obesity in the restricted cubic spline; Table S3: Relationship between SNP and methylation level of SOCS3; Table S4: Relationship between SNP of SOCS3 and abdominal obesity; Table S5: Effects of each CpG site at each SNP of SOCS3 on abdominal obesity using the Wald ratio method; Figure S1: The dose–response relationship between methylation levels of SOCS3 with obesity.

Author Contributions

G.Z. and Y.L. designed and integrated the research; Y.L. and X.L. conducted research; Y.L., R.T. and J.H. collected and analyzed the data; Y.L. and X.L. wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Foundation of National Key Program of Research and Development of China (grant no.: 2016YFC0900803), Science and Technology Innovation Team Support Plan of Colleges and Universities in Henan Province (grant no.: 21IRTSTHN029), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no.: 81602925, 82003543) and the Natural Science Foundation of Zhengzhou University (grant no.: JC22852046). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Zhengzhou University Life Science Ethics Committee [(2015) MEC (S128), 6 May 2015].

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to all participants and research staff of the current study and to the administrators for their support during the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. GBD 2015 Obesity Collaborators; Afshin, A.; Forouzanfar, M.H.; Reitsma, M.B.; Sur, P.; Estep, K.; Lee, A.; Marczak, L.; Mokdad, A.H.; Moradi-Lakeh, M.; et al. Health Effects of Overweight and Obesity in 195 Countries over 25 Years. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 13–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Fang, H.; Berg, E.; Cheng, X.; Shen, W. How to best assess abdominal obesity. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2018, 21, 360–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jaacks, L.M.; Vandevijvere, S.; Pan, A.; McGowan, C.J.; Wallace, C.; Imamura, F.; Mozaffarian, D.; Swinburn, B.; Ezzati, M. The obesity transition: Stages of the global epidemic. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019, 7, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Aranceta-Bartrina, J.; Pérez-Rodrigo, C.; Alberdi-Aresti, G.; Ramos-Carrera, N.; Lázaro-Masedo, S. Prevalence of General Obesity and Abdominal Obesity in the Spanish Adult Population (Aged 25–64 Years) 2014–2015: The ENPE Study. Rev. Esp. Cardiol. 2016, 69, 579–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Aranceta-Bartrina, J.; Gianzo-Citores, M.; Pérez-Rodrigo, C. Prevalence of overweight, obesity and abdominal obesity in the Spanish population aged 3 to 24 years. The ENPE study. Rev. Esp. Cardiol. 2020, 73, 290–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, L.; Wang, Z.; Wang, X.; Chen, Z.; Shao, L.; Tian, Y.; Dong, Y.; Zheng, C.; Li, S.; Zhu, M.; et al. China Hypertension Survey investigators. Prevalence of Abdominal Obesity in China: Results from a Cross-Sectional Study of Nearly Half a Million Participants. Obesity 2019, 27, 1898–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bjørbæk, C.; El-Haschimi, K.; Frantz, J.D.; Flier, J.S. The role of SOCS-3 in leptin signaling and leptin resistance. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 30059–30065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Howard, J.K.; Flier, J.S. Attenuation of leptin and insulin signaling by SOCS proteins. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2006, 17, 365–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ali, O.; Cerjak, D.; Kent, J.W., Jr.; James, R.; Blangero, J.; Carless, M.A.; Zhang, Y. Methylation of SOCS3 is inversely associated with metabolic syndrome in an epigenome-wide association study of obesity. Epigenetics 2016, 11, 699–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xu, K.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Z.; Hu, Y.; Sinha, R. Epigenome-wide association analysis revealed that SOCS3 methylation influences the effect of cumulative stress on obesity. Biol. Psychol. 2018, 131, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wilson, L.E.; Harlid, S.; Xu, Z.; Sandler, D.P.; Taylor, J.A. An epigenome-wide study of body mass index and DNA methylation in blood using participants from the Sister Study cohort. Int. J. Obes. 2017, 41, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ross, R.; Neeland, I.J.; Yamashita, S.; Shai, I.; Seidell, J.; Magni, P.; Santos, R.D.; Arsenault, B.; Cuevas, A.; Hu, F.B.; et al. Waist circumference as a vital sign in clinical practice: A Consensus Statement from the IAS and ICCR Working Group on Visceral Obesity. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2020, 16, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fan, Y.; Wang, R.; Ding, L.; Meng, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Shen, Y.; Hu, G.; Liu, M. Waist Circumference and its Changes Are More Strongly Associated with the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes than Body Mass Index and Changes in Body Weight in Chinese Adults. J. Nutr. 2020, 150, 1259–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Janssen, I.; Katzmarzyk, P.T.; Ross, R. Waist circumference and not body mass index explains obesity-related health risk. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 79, 379–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, X.; Mao, Z.; Li, Y.; Wu, W.; Zhang, X.; Huo, W.; Yu, S.; Shen, L.; Li, L.; Tu, R.; et al. Cohort Profile: The Henan Rural Cohort: A prospective study of chronic non-communicable diseases. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2019, 48, 1756–1756j. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. International Diabetes Federation. The IDF Consensus Worldwide Definition of the Metabolic Syndrome. Available online: https://www.idf.org/our-activities/advocacy-awareness/resources-and-tools/60:idfconsensus-worldwide-definitionof-the-metabolic-syndrome.html (accessed on 15 September 2022).
  17. Liu, X.; Qian, X.; Tu, R.; Mao, Z.; Huo, W.; Zhang, H.; Jiang, J.; Zhang, X.; Tian, Z.; Li, Y.; et al. SOCS3 methylation mediated the effect of sedentary time on type 2 diabetes mellitus: The Henan Rural Cohort study. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2020, 30, 634–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhou, S.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Cai, B.; Liu, K.; Zhang, H.; Dai, M.; Sun, L.; Xu, X.; et al. CDKN2B methylation is associated with carotid artery calcification in ischemic stroke patients. J. Transl. Med. 2016, 14, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ledwina, T.; Gnot, S. Testing for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Biometrics 1980, 36, 161–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, X.T.; Tu, R.Q.; He, Y.L.; Dong, X.K.; Li, R.Y.; Hou, J.; Li, Y.Q.; Wang, C.J. Mendelian randomization analysis: The causal relationship between the DNA methylation levels of JAK2 and obesity. Chin. J. Epidemiol. 2022, 43, 1315–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Burgess, S.; Thompson, S.G. Interpreting findings from Mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2017, 32, 377–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Thomas, D.C.; Lawlor, D.A.; Thompson, J.R. Re: Estimation of bias in nongenetic observational studies using “Mendelian triangulation” by Bautista et al. Ann. Epidemiol. 2007, 17, 511–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jamieson, E.; Korologou-Linden, R.; Wootton, R.E.; Guyatt, A.L.; Battram, T.; Burrows, K.; Gaunt, T.R.; Tobin, M.D.; Munafò, M.; Smith, G.D.; et al. Smoking, DNA Methylation, and Lung Function: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis to Investigate Causal Pathways. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2020, 106, 315–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Moore, L.D.; Le, T.; Fan, G. DNA methylation and its basic function. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013, 38, 23–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Samblas, M.; Milagro, F.I.; Martínez, A. DNA methylation markers in obesity, metabolic syndrome, and weight loss. Epigenetics 2019, 14, 421–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nikpay, M.; Ravati, S.; Dent, R.; McPherson, R. Epigenome-Wide Study Identified Methylation Sites Associated with the Risk of Obesity. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Westerman, K.; Sebastiani, P.; Jacques, P.; Liu, S.; DeMeo, D.; Ordovás, J.M. DNA methylation modules associate with incident cardiovascular disease and cumulative risk factor exposure. Clin. Epigenet. 2019, 11, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, L.; Liu, X.; Wei, D.; Kang, N.; Nie, L.; Liu, P.; Fan, K.; Zhang, L.; Hou, J.; Li, X.; et al. The mediation role of SOCS3 methylation in the effect of serum testosterone on type 2 diabetes. J. Diabetes. 2021, 13, 701–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chambers, J.C.; Loh, M.; Lehne, B.; Drong, A.; Kriebel, J.; Motta, V.; Wahl, S.; Elliott, H.R.; Rota, F.; Scott, W.R.; et al. Epigenome-wide association of DNA methylation markers in peripheral blood from Indian Asians and Europeans with incident type 2 diabetes: A nested case-control study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015, 3, 526–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kvaløy, K.; Page, C.M.; Holmen, T.L. Holmen, Epigenome-wide methylation differences in a group of lean and obese women—A HUNT Study. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 16330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Al Muftah, W.A.; Al-Shafai, M.; Zaghlool, S.B.; Visconti, A.; Tsai, P.C.; Kumar, P.; Spector, T.; Bell, J.; Falchi, M.; Suhre, K. Epigenetic associations of type 2 diabetes and BMI in an Arab population. Clin. Epigenet. 2016, 8, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Jurkowska, R.Z.; Jurkowski, T.P.; Jeltsch, A. Jeltsch, Structure and function of mammalian DNA methyltransferases. Chembiochem 2011, 12, 206–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Xue, A.I.; Zhang, Y.F.; Liu, J.J.; Zhang, L.R. Analysis of DNA Methylation in Gene Functional Regions. J. Inn. Mong. Univ. 2016, 47, 290–298. [Google Scholar]
  34. Shayevitch, R.; Askayo, D.; Keydar, I.; Ast, G. The importance of DNA methylation of exons on alternative splicing. RNA 2018, 24, 1351–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ball, M.P.; Li, J.B.; Gao, Y.; Lee, J.H.; LeProust, E.M.; Park, I.H.; Xie, B.; Daley, G.Q.; Church, G.M. Targeted and genome-scale strategies reveal gene-body methylation signatures in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2009, 27, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jones, P.A. Functions of DNA methylation: Islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 13, 484–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mahony, R.; Ahmed, S.; Diskin, C.; Stevenson, N.J. SOCS3 revisited: A broad regulator of disease, now ready for therapeutic use? Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2016, 73, 3323–3336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mandò, C.; Abati, S.; Anelli, G.M.; Favero, C.; Serati, A.; Dioni, L.; Zambon, M.; Albetti, B.; Bollati, V.; Cetin, I. Epigenetic Profiling in the Saliva of Obese Pregnant Women. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gurzov, E.N.; Stanley, W.J.; Pappas, E.G.; Thomas, H.E.; Gough, D.J. The JAK/STAT pathway in obesity and diabetes. FEBS J. 2016, 283, 3002–3015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pedroso, J.A.B.; Ramos-Lobo, A.M.; Donato, J., Jr. SOCS3 as a future target to treat metabolic disorders. Hormones 2019, 18, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ueki, K.; Kondo, T.; Kahn, C.R. Suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 (SOCS-1) and SOCS-3 cause insulin resistance through inhibition of tyrosine phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate proteins by discrete mechanisms. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2004, 24, 5434–5446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Smith, G.D.; Ebrahim, S. ‘Mendelian randomization’: Can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease? Int. J. Epidemiol. 2003, 32, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Yuan, S.; Yao, H.; Larsson, S.C. Associations of cigarette smoking with psychiatric disorders: Evidence from a two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 13807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Distributions of characteristics of the participant by with and without abdominal obesity.
Table 1. Distributions of characteristics of the participant by with and without abdominal obesity.
VariablesTotal
(n = 1064)		Abdominal Obesity (n = 471)Non-Abdominal Obesity (n = 593)p-Value
Age (years, mean ± SD)59.52 ± 8.6758.70 ± 8.4660.17 ± 8.780.006
WC (cm, mean ± SD)83.23 ± 10.7891.82 ± 7.9276.40 ± 7.32<0.001
Gender, n (%) <0.001
  Men459 (43.14)138 (29.30)321 (54.13)
  Women605(56.86)333 (70.70)272 (45.87)
Education levels, n (%) 0.843
  Elementary school or below586 (55.08)261 (55.41)325 (54.81)
  Junior high school or above478 (44.92)210 (44.59)268 (45.19)
Marital status, n (%) 0.819
  Married/cohabiting953 (89.57)423 (89.81)530 (89.38)
  Widowed/single/divorced/separation111 (10.43)48 (10.19)63 (10.62)
Average monthly income of family, n (%) 0.510
  CNY < 500426 (40.04)194 (41.19)232 (39.12)
  CNY 500 ~336 (31.58)140 (29.72)196 (33.05)
  CNY ≥ 1000302 (28.38)137 (29.09)165 (27.83)
High-fat diet, n (%) 0.055
  Yes205 (19.27)103 (21.87)102 (17.20)
  No859 (80.73)368 (78.13)491 (82.80)
More vegetable and fruit intake, n (%) 0.482
  Yes690 (64.85)300 (63.69)390 (65.77)
  No374 (35.15)171 (36.31)203 (34.23)
Smoking status, n (%) <0.001
  Never762 (71.62)379 (80.47)383 (64.59)
  Ever88 (8.27)39 (8.28)49 (8.26)
  Current214 (20.11)53 (11.25)161 (27.15)
Drinking status, n (%) 0.063
  Never841 (79.04)386 (81.95)455 (76.73)
  Ever62 (5.83)20 (4.25)42 (7.08)
  Current161 (15.13)65 (13.80)96 (16.19)
Physical activity (n, %) 0.001
  Low282 (26.50)137 (29.09)145 (24.45)
  Moderate478 (44.92)226 (47.98)252 (42.50)
  High304 (28.57)108 (22.93)196 (33.05)
Family history of T2DM (n, %) 0.395
  Yes30 (2.82)11 (2.34)19 (3.20)
  No1034 (97.18)460 (97.66)574 (96.80)
Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation; WC, waist circumference; T2DM, type 2 diabetes.
Table
Table 2. Associations of SOCS3 methylation level with abdominal obesity.
Table 2. Associations of SOCS3 methylation level with abdominal obesity.
CpG SitesLocationDistance2TSSAbdominal Obesity
Median (IQR)		Non-Abdominal Obesity
Median (IQR)		OR (95% CI)p-Value
Chr17:76356178Promoter−180.005 (0.003, 0.007)0.005 (0.004, 0.007)0.795 (0.679, 0.930)0.004
Chr17:76356190Promoter−300.008 (0.006, 0.012)0.009 (0.006, 0.014)0.841 (0.721, 0.983)0.029
Chr17:76356054Exon1060.012 (0.009, 0.014)0.012 (0.010, 0.015)0.786 (0.672, 0.919)0.003
Chr17:76356084Exon760.025 (0.020, 0.030)0.026 (0.021, 0.031)0.851 (0.732, 0.988)0.034
Chr17:76356099Exon610.007 (0.005, 0.009)0.007 (0.005, 0.010)0.838 (0.719, 0.976)0.023
Chr17:76354927Exon12330.338 (0.282, 0.405)0.331 (0.269, 0.388)1.280 (1.064, 1.539)0.009
Chr17:76354934Exon12260.540 (0.476, 0.610)0.531 (0.459, 0.592)1.284 (1.067, 1.546)0.008
Chr17:76354947Exon12130.454 (0.388, 0.535)0.445 (0.373, 0.514)1.272 (1.050, 1.541)0.014
Chr17:76354955Exon12050.422 (0.354, 0.500)0.410 (0.340, 0.483)1.286 (1.064, 1.554)0.009
Chr17:76354963Exon11970.283 (0.224, 0.345)0.273 (0.217, 0.334)1.277 (1.059, 1.539)0.010
Chr17:76354965Exon11950.344 (0.286, 0.409)0.332 (0.272, 0.395)1.272 (1.056, 1.533)0.011
Chr17:76354984Exon11760.287 (0.232, 0.361)0.277 (0.223, 0.344)1.266 (1.053, 1.522)0.012
Chr17:76354990Exon11700.119 (0.088, 0.156)0.113 (0.084, 0.147)1.243 (1.044, 1.480)0.015
Chr17:76355009Exon11510.287 (0.225, 0.354)0.271 (0.214, 0.345)1.282 (1.065, 1.543)0.009
Chr17:76355014Exon11460.351 (0.284, 0.437)0.341 (0.271, 0.412)1.310 (1.084, 1.584)0.005
Chr17:76355017Exon11430.277 (0.226, 0.341)0.270 (0.214, 0.328)1.277 (1.061, 1.537)0.010
Chr17:76355020Exon11400.271 (0.216, 0.333)0.260 (0.207, 0.321)1.324 (1.102, 1.591)0.003
Chr17:76355029Exon11310.274 (0.216, 0.334)0.263 (0.207, 0.322)1.266 (1.051, 1.525)0.013
Chr17:76355044Exon11160.327 (0.258, 0.404)0.316 (0.249, 0.388)1.297 (1.073, 1.569)0.007
Chr17:76355061Exon10990.410 (0.334, 0.493)0.397 (0.323, 0.479)1.325 (1.092, 1.608)0.004
Chr17:76355068Exon10920.279 (0.213, 0.360)0.268 (0.201, 0.342)1.276 (1.056, 1.542)0.012
Chr17:76355089Exon10710.293 (0.225, 0.375)0.280 (0.210, 0.360)1.285 (1.060, 1.557)0.011
Chr17:76355115Exon10450.277 (0.210, 0.359)0.269 (0.200, 0.344)1.242 (1.026, 1.504)0.026
Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. Adjusted for age, gender, education levels, marital status, average monthly income of family, high-fat diet, more vegetable and fruit intake, smoking status, drinking status, physical activity and family history of type 2 diabetes.
Table
Table 3. Associations between SNP of SOCS3 and abdominal obesity.
Table 3. Associations between SNP of SOCS3 and abdominal obesity.
SNPTotalAbdominal ObesityNon-Abdominal Obesityp-ValueOR (95% CI)HWE p-Value
rs12953258 0.540 0.235
  GG473 (44.79)205 (43.80)268 (45.58) 1.00
  GT486 (46.02)215 (45.94)271 (46.09) 0.985 (0.750, 1.295)
  TT97 (9.19)48 (10.26)49 (8.33) 1.111 (0.700, 1.764)
  Each T increase 1.027 (0.841, 1.255)
rs2280148 0.392 0.967
  GG661 (62.59)303 (64.88)358 (60.78) 1.00
  GT344 (32.58)143 (30.62)201 (34.13) 0.869 (0.656, 1.151)
  TT51 (4.83)21 (4.50)30 (5.09) 0.851 (0.461, 1.571)
  Each T increase 0.892 (0.714, 1.115)
rs4969168 0.208 0.584
  GG209 (19.75)85 (18.12)124 (21.05) 1.00
  GA542 (51.23)236 (50.32)306 (51.95) 0.938 (0.663, 1.328)
  AA307 (29.02)148 (31.56)159 (27.00) 1.145 (0.783, 1.675)
  Each A increase 1.087 (0.900, 1.311)
rs4969170 0.931 0.999
  GG850 (80.26)374 (79.74)476 (80.68) 1.00
  GA198 (18.70)90 (19.19)108 (18.30) 1.059 (0.759, 1.476)
  AA11 (1.04)5 (1.07)6 (1.02) 1.374 (0.385, 4.908)
  Each A increase 1.080 (0.799, 1.461)
rs9892622 0.258 0.828
  GG215 (20.30)91 (19.40)124 (21.02) 1.00
  GA526 (49.67)225 (47.97)301 (51.02) 0.950 (0.674, 1.338)
  AA318 (30.03)153 (32.63)165 (27.96) 1.203 (0.829, 1.746)
  Each A increase 1.113 (0.926, 1.339)
rs9914220 0.016 0.567
  CC390 (36.83)194 (41.36)196 (33.22) 1.00
  CT479 (45.23)202 (43.07)277 (46.95) 0.753 (0.565, 1.003)
  TT190 (17.94)73 (15.57)117 (19.83) 0.705 (0.484, 1.027)
  Each T increase 0.823 (0.686, 0.988)
Abbreviation: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. Adjusted for age, gender, education levels, marital status, average monthly income of family, high-fat diet, more vegetable and fruit intake, smoking status, drinking status, physical activity and family history of type 2 diabetes. HWE: Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium.
Table
Table 4. Mendelian randomization causal-effect estimates for SOCS3 methylation level with abdominal obesity.
Table 4. Mendelian randomization causal-effect estimates for SOCS3 methylation level with abdominal obesity.
Methodβ (95%CI)p-Value
Maximum-likelihood method5.342 (0.215, 10.469)0.041
MR-IVW4.911 (0.259, 9.564)0.039
MR-median5.117 (−1.356, 11.590)0.121
Abbreviation: β, correlation coefficient; CI, confidence interval; MR-IVW, Mendelian randomization method of penalized inverse variance weighted; MR-median, Mendelian randomization method of median.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Y.; Liu, X.; Tu, R.; Hou, J.; Zhuang, G. Mendelian Randomization Analysis of the Association of SOCS3 Methylation with Abdominal Obesity. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3824. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14183824

AMA Style

Li Y, Liu X, Tu R, Hou J, Zhuang G. Mendelian Randomization Analysis of the Association of SOCS3 Methylation with Abdominal Obesity. Nutrients. 2022; 14(18):3824. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14183824

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Yuqian, Xiaotian Liu, Runqi Tu, Jian Hou, and Guihua Zhuang. 2022. "Mendelian Randomization Analysis of the Association of SOCS3 Methylation with Abdominal Obesity" Nutrients 14, no. 18: 3824. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14183824

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop