Next Article in Journal
Interactive Effects of Methionine and Lead Intake on Cognitive Function among Chinese Adults
Next Article in Special Issue
Long-Term Diet Quality and Risk of Diabetes in a National Survey of Chinese Adults
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Vitamin D on Satellite Cells: A Systematic Review of In Vivo Studies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Whey Protein or Its Hydrolysate Supplements Combined with an Energy-Restricted Diet on Weight Loss: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Older Women
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Inverse Association of Fruit and Vegetable Consumption with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Nutrients 2022, 14(21), 4559; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14214559
by Lin-Jia Du 1, Zhi-Ying He 1, Xiao Gu 1, Xiang Hu 1, Xing-Xing Zhang 1, Li-Juan Yang 1, Jing Li 1, Lin-Yu Pan 1, Ying-Qian Li 1, Bo Yang 2,* and Xue-Jiang Gu 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Nutrients 2022, 14(21), 4559; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14214559
Submission received: 13 September 2022 / Revised: 14 October 2022 / Accepted: 17 October 2022 / Published: 29 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Effect of Dietary Patterns or Eating Habits on Diabetes)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Title: Inverse association of fruit and vegetable consumption with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus 

Although study looks interesting there are some issues with this manuscript.

1. English language throughout the manuscript needs to be improved.

2. Introduction:

-I recommend begin the introduction with a brief description of diabetes, linking NAFLD to obesity, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes. Answer the reader's question on the role of insulin in fat disposition and its correlation to NAFLD

- The authors should clarify the novelty of this article in the ‘Introduction’ and ‘Conclusion’ section.

3. Materials and Methods

-Authors need to include the manufacturer, supplier, country, and city for the reagents/instruments used for these studies.

4. Results:

-I would suggest to include the significant symbol (*) within the values.

5. Discussion:

-How is this article more informative than the previously published ones? Justify it.

- I would suggest to include the future prospective of these studies.

6.Conclusion:

-This section sounds good; however, I request to elaborate a bit more to make it easier to understand the reader.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

It would be useful if the Authors may supply (as supplementary material or even only for the Reviewer) the actual FFQ used. At present, it is unclear which data on whole diet were obtained, the Authors mention "fish and sugary beverage) in the Methods section, but never refer again to these two items in the Results or Discussion. They also state that in model 2 they adjusted the data for "food intake" but do not specificy if they mean total intake (calories?) or a specific dietetic pattern

Author Response

please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop