Next Article in Journal
The Donkey Milk in Infant Nutrition
Next Article in Special Issue
Variants in the VDR Gene May Influence 25(OH)D Levels in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in a Brazilian Population
Previous Article in Journal
Protective Effects of Spirulina maxima against Blue Light-Induced Retinal Damages in A2E-Laden ARPE-19 Cells and Balb/c Mice
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 14
Issue 3
10.3390/nu14030402
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Adequacy and Vitamin D in the Preoperative Period of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, Bariatric Surgery, Can Protect Metabolic Health in Metabolically Healthy and Unhealthy Individuals

by
Suelem Pereira da Cruz
1,*,
Sabrina Cruz
1,
Silvia Pereira
2,
Carlos Saboya
3,
Juliana Castelar Lack Veiga
4 and
Andréa Ramalho
1
1
Center for Research on Micronutrients, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (NPqM/UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro 21941-902, Brazil
2
Multidisciplinary Center for Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (NPqM/UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro 21941-902, Brazil
3
Brazilian Society of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Rio de Janeiro 22280-020, Brazil
4
Center for Research on Micronutrients, Federal University of Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro 24220-008, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2022, 14(3), 402; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14030402
Submission received: 13 December 2021 / Revised: 10 January 2022 / Accepted: 13 January 2022 / Published: 18 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vitamin D Receptor in Human Health and Disease)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Evaluating the influence of vitamin D concentrations together with preoperative metabolic phenotypes on remission of chronic noncommunicable diseases (CNCDs) after 6 months of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Cross-sectional analytical study comprising 30 adult individuals who were assessed preoperatively (T0) and 6 months (T1) after undergoing RYGB. Participants were distributed preoperatively into metabolically healthy obese (MHO) and metabolically unhealthy obese (MUHO) individuals according to HOMA-IR classification and to the adequacy and inadequacy of vitamin D concentrations in the form of 25(OH)D. All participants were assessed for anthropometric characteristics, biochemical variables, and presence of CNCDs. The statistical program used was the SPSS version 21. In face of vitamin D adequacy and regardless of the metabolic phenotype classification in the preoperative period, the means found for HOMA-IR allowed us to define them as metabolically healthy 6 months after RYGB. Only those with vitamin D inadequacy with the MUHO phenotype showed better results regarding the reduction of glucose that accompanied the shift in serum 25(OH)D concentrations from deficient to insufficient. It is possible that preoperative vitamin D adequacy, even in the presence of an unhealthy phenotype, may contribute to the reduction of dyslipidemia and improvement in cholesterol. It is suggested that preoperative vitamin D adequacy in both phenotypes may have a protective effect on metabolic health.

1. Introduction

Bariatric surgery aims to reduce the total body mass with consequent remission of chronic noncommunicable diseases (CNCDs), which can happen more intensely in the minimum period of 6 months after the procedure [1]. Several factors may be involved in this remission, among which we highlight the metabolic phenotypes and serum concentrations of vitamin D.
The scientific literature, when comparing metabolically healthy obese (MHO) or unhealthy obese (MUHO) individuals, shows that MUHO presents characteristics that can facilitate the onset of obesity-associated diseases, such as inadequate functionality of adipose tissue that, in turn, favors the appearance of lipotoxic products, presence of insulin resistance (IR), greater ectopic and visceral fat storage that contribute to the development of cardiometabolic diseases [2,3,4,5].
The weight loss process promoted by bariatric surgery may be related to lipolytic gene expression that correlates inversely with biomarkers of lipid and glucose metabolism [6]. However, some studies evaluating the preoperative interference of the MHO and MUHO phenotypes on remission of CNCDs after a period of 6 to 24 months after bariatric surgery found contradictory results [7,8,9]. Although weight loss resulting from bariatric surgery may promote metabolic benefits, there may be disorders originating from the procedure. Such disorders may contribute to the development of nutritional deficiencies such as vitamin D deficiency (VDD) [10,11,12]. This scenario may be even more worrisome due to (1) a frequent decrease in serum concentrations of this nutrient previous to surgery, (2) the strongly established relationship of this vitamin with body fat distribution, and (3) its peculiar role in regulating several metabolic processes [13,14].
However, to date, there are no studies investigating the relationship between vitamin D and CNCD considering the metabolic phenotypes after bariatric surgery. Thus, the aim of the present study is to evaluate the influence of vitamin D concentrations together with the preoperative metabolic phenotypes on remission of CNCDs 6 months after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB).

2. Materials and Methods

This is a cross-sectional study of the analytical type consisting of 30 adult individuals with obesity who underwent RYGB, selected by convenience at the Multidisciplinary Center for Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery located in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in the period from July 2019 to September 2020.
Participants were evaluated preoperatively (T0) in relation to the inclusion and exclusion criteria established for the research and followed up for 6 months (T1) after undergoing RYGB. They were further distributed preoperatively into MHO (metabolically health obese) and MUHO (metabolic unhealthy obese) according to HOMA-IR classification, as well as to the adequacy and inadequacy of vitamin D concentrations (25(OH)D) according to the criteria of Holick et al. (2012) [15,16,17]. Inclusion criteria were adults of both sexes classified according to body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 kg/m2 and age ≥ 20 and <60 years preoperatively, who formally authorized their enrollment by signing the informed consent form. Exclusion criteria were: Previous disabsorptive and restrictive surgeries, intestinal disabsorptive syndromes, neoplasms, use of drugs for total body mass loss, alcohol consumption higher than 20 g/day for women and 40 g/day for men, pregnant or nursing women, kidney insufficiency and liver diseases, except nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, endocrinopathies (hypothyroidism, hypercortisolemia), acute and chronic infections, use of anticonvulsant drugs or drugs that interfere with vitamin D metabolism, use of medication or supplement rich in vitamin D for 2 months prior to the first laboratory test. The instrument used for data collection was previously tested and consisted of a form filled out by a single interviewer through consultation of medical records. All the members of this study were evaluated for anthropometric variables and laboratory tests. Regarding the anthropometric variables, the total body mass (kg) and height (m) were measured to calculate the BMI in which the cutoff point adopted for class II and III obesity classification was ≥35 kg/m2, according to the WHO recommendation [18]. Biochemical tests were performed to evaluate the lipid profile by the Enzymatic Colorimetric method, measuring total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), triglycerides; fasting glycemia by the enzymatic method, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) by turbidimetry, basal insulin by chemiluminescence, evaluation of the homeostatic model-insulin resistance by specific calculation of the Homeostasis Model Assessment Estimate for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR). The latter was used to assess insulin resistance, and values equal to or above 2.5 were used as cutoff point [16,17]. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital Universitario Clementino Fraga Filho and the Faculty of Medicine of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, under n° 360/60, Research Protocol n° 011/10, on 15 May 2010.
Vitamin D analysis was performed in the form of 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D by means of High Efficiency Liquid Chromatography with an ultraviolet detector (HPLC-UV) [19]. Thus, this nutrient was evaluated in the form of 25(OH)D and classified as showing deficiency (≤20 ng/mL) or insufficiency (≥21 ng/mL lower or equal to 29 ng/mL). Participants were classified as inadequate when they showed insufficiency and deficiency, whereas those with values ≥30ng/mL lower or equal to 100 ng/mL were classified as adequate [15].
The overall technical requirements for adequately obtaining blood pressure (BP), as well as the definition of the cutoff point equal to or greater than 140/90 mmHg, which is considered hypertensive, followed the specifications of the VI Brazilian Guidelines on Hypertension [20].
For diagnosing type II diabetes mellitus (2DM), the American Diabetes Association criterion was applied [16]. Thus, 2DM was diagnosed when fasting serum glucose was ≥ 126 mg/dL, or capillary blood glucose with symptoms of hyperglycemia was equal to or greater than 200 mg/dL, or 2 h after 75 g of glucose overload with values equal to or greater than 200 mg/dL or glycated hemoglobin equal to or greater than or 6.5. To evaluate the presence of dyslipidemias, the cutoff points of the V Brazilian Guidelines on Dyslipidemias and Prevention of Atherosclerosis were used [17]. The cut-off points were added to the tables.
Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows version 21.0. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was performed to evaluate the normality of the sample. Measures of central tendency and dispersion (mean and standard deviation) were calculated for quantitative variables, and the Mann–Whitney or Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to compare the means. To test the homogeneity of proportions between categorical variables, the Pearson chi-square test, the Fisher’s exact test, and Linear Correlation (Spearman test) were applied between the non-parametric variables. The significance level adopted was 5% (p < 0.05).

3. Results

The study comprised 30 patients who previously underwent RYGB. Their evaluation was conducted before and 6 months after this surgical procedure. In the total sample, 60% were female and 40% male. To perform the evaluations, the patients were divided into groups, considering the metabolic phenotypes together with the adequacy/inadequacy of serum vitamin D concentrations, and were also matched for BMI, age and sex.
The mean HOMA-IR values, 6 months after RYGB, allow including in the healthy phenotype the individuals who had vitamin D adequacy preoperatively, independent of the metabolic phenotype classification (Table 1). Furthermore, there was a reduction in the BMI percentage independent of the subdivision of the groups. When the groups were only evaluated according to the preoperative phenotypes, we observed that 46.7% of the sample had a healthy metabolic phenotype and 53.3% had an unhealthy metabolic phenotype, and the means of the preoperative serum 25(OH)D concentrations of the total sample were 23.31 ± 9.62. Furthermore, 81.2% of those with MUHO transitioned to MHO 6 months after bariatric surgery. Additionally, both metabolic phenotypes had 25(OH)D means that allow their classification as insufficient in both segments (MHO: 27.67 ± 10.66 and MUHO: 21.36 ± 7.78; p = 0.151). Moreover, they presented similar means for almost all biochemical variables, except for 1,25(OH)2D, which was higher in the MUHO (MHO: 35.18 ± 8.53 and MUHO individuals: 47.40 ± 9.31; p = 0.003) and showed a strong correlation with HOMA-IR (0.982 p = 0.000). Nonetheless, such an increase in postoperative serum 1,25(OH)2D concentrations occurred only in the MUHO segment with preoperative 25(OH)D adequacy (MUHO with adequacy: 33.32 ± 1.14 and MUHO with inadequacy: 17.37 ± 3.37; p = 0.000).
When the groups were only analyzed according to the preoperative adequacy/inadequacy of 25(OH)D, the means in the segment of adequacy of this nutrient were 37.32 ± 6.44 and in those with inadequacy were 19.57 ± 5.09 (p = 0.000). Patients with preoperative 25(OH)D ≥ 30 ng/mL maintained their means after surgery, and also had reduced HOMA-IR means, which allows classifying individuals as MHO (T0:3.87 ± 3.40 and T1:1.25 ± 0.57; p = 0.007).

3.1. 25(OH)D ≥ 30 ng/mL and Metabolic Phenotypes

In relation to the patients who had an adequacy of 25(OH)D with the MHO phenotype, there was a reduction in glycated hemoglobin and insulin in which the latter variable also had a strong negative correlation with the metabolic phenotype at T0 (T0: r = −0.980; p = 0.020). In addition, 1,25(OH)2D increased after bariatric surgery (Table 1).
The segment of participants who had preoperative 25(OH)D adequacy together with MUHO had reduced mean and percentage of cholesterol inadequacy after surgery (Table 1), which in turn was strongly and negatively correlated with the metabolic phenotype (T0: −r = 0.955; p = 0.045). Moreover, in this segment, 25(OH)D was strongly and negatively correlated with BMI (T0: r = −0.997; p = 0.003), insulin (T0: r = −0.975; p = 0.025) and positively correlated with 25(OH)D (T1: r = 0.977; p = 0.023) 6 months after RYGB. Furthermore, the presence of dyslipidemia was reduced, and there were no cases of MUHO after 6 months (Table 1).

3.2. 25(OH)D < 30 ng/mL and Metabolic Phenotypes

When there was preoperative inadequacy of 25(OH)D with the MHO phenotype, a reduction in insulin, glycated hemoglobin, cholesterol, and LDL was observed postoperatively. Lower percentages of cholesterol inadequacy cases were also observed (Table 2). Insulin showed strong positive correlation with the metabolic phenotypes (T0: r = 0.820; p = 0.004) and negative correlation with 25(OH)D (T0: r = −0.747; p = 0.013), both assessed preoperatively. This nutrient also correlated negatively with glucose (T0: r = −0.693; p = 0.026) and positively with HDL (T0: r = 0.665; p = 0.036) at T0, as well as with postoperative 25(OH)D (T1: r = −0.747; p = 0.013).
In the segment of vitamin D inadequacy and MUHO, there was a reduction of insulin, glycated hemoglobin, cholesterol, LDL, glucose and increase in 25(OH)D shifting from deficient to insufficient, as well as a decrease in the percentage of inadequate insulin, cholesterol and MUHO cases (Table 2). Moreover, postoperatively, a positive correlation was found between the metabolic phenotypes assessed at T0 with VLDL (T1: r = 0.603; p = 0.038) and HOMA-IR (T1: r = 0.607; p = 0.036). Regarding preoperative 25(OH)D, there was a negative correlation with HOMA-BETA (T0: −r = 0.659; p = 0.020) at T0 and TG (T0: r = −0.696; p = 0.012 and T1: r = −0.610; p = 0.035) at both times.

4. Discussion

It is estimated that the inadequacy of 25(OH)D in the pre- and postoperative period is a recurring event and may reach up to 80% of this segment [21,22,23]. This nutrient, in turn, may be related to metabolic phenotypes in obesity, considering that individuals of the MHO phenotype may have higher concentrations of 25(OH)D, possibly justified by a healthier metabolic profile compared to individuals of the MUHO phenotype [24]. Furthermore, it has been suggested that 25(OH)D may offer a protective metabolic effect in the MHO group [25]. It has also been reported that VDD may be related to cardiovascular events, especially in the presence of metabolic alterations associated with obesity [26,27].
In this sense, some studies argue about the possibility of 25(OH)D being considered a clinical marker for a healthy metabolic profile, as well as whether this nutrient can predict the progression from the MHO status to the MUHO, considering that VDD may contribute to the increased risk of developing CNCDs [28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. Inclusively, VDR expression may underlie the various effects of 25(OH)D and provide a mechanistic basis for the association between VDD and diseases that are related to obesity [34,35,36], in which it has been suggested that the low-grade inflammation in obesity may be linked to VDD [37].
Thus, in the context of bariatric surgery, the presence of a healthy phenotype and preoperative adequacy of 25(OH)D could be related to more expressive metabolic benefits after bariatric surgery, however, there are no studies that address this issue. In this aspect, the present study found that when there is 25(OH)D adequacy, the means found for HOMA-IR, 6 months after RYGB, allow defining these individuals as metabolically healthy, regardless of the preoperative classification of the metabolic phenotype. Therefore, it is possible that preoperative 25(OH)D adequacy in both phenotypes may have a protective effect on metabolic health.
Although no significant differences were found between the phenotypes regarding serum 25(OH)D concentrations after bariatric surgery, MUHO participants had higher mean 1,25(OH)2D, which, in turn, showed a strong correlation with HOMA-IR. However, this post-surgical increase occurred only in the MUHO segment with vitamin D adequacy (25(OH)D). Thus, it is suggested that the increased 1,25(OH)2D concentrations in MUHO with 25(OH)D adequacy found in the present study may indicate an increased need for it, which in turn may have contributed to metabolic protection of these patients after surgery. Even in this segment, there were no cases of MUHO 6 months after RYGB. Thus, it is possible that calcitriol may attenuate the action of preadipocytes in the basal release of IL-8 and IL-6 and in the action of macrophages, leading to a reduction in the production of MCP-1, which ratifies the anti-inflammatory effect, facilitating reduction of MUHO [38,39,40]. Moreover, some studies have reported the presence of vitamin D receptors (VDR) in ventricular cardiomyocytes and fibroblasts, suggesting an important action of this nutrient in the maintenance of cardiometabolic health [41,42]. In segments of patients with hypertension, 2DM and obesity, foam cell formation in isolated macrophages can be suppressed by 1,25(OH)2D and the mechanism of action involves the reduction of LDL uptake [43]. In addition, experimental study suggests that the progression of coronary artery disease may be accelerated by the presence of VDD, due to the increased activation of the nuclear factor-kB, a nutrient indirectly related to the anti-inflammatory function [44].
In the context of type 2 diabetes mellitus pathophysiology, it has been reported that vitamin D may exhibit some actions in pancreatic beta cells such as activation of the VDR; and binding of 1,25(OH)2D to the VDR, which promotes transcription of regulated genes to its active form. In addition, it is also responsible for the presence of the vitamin D responsive element (VDRE) in the promoter gene of insulin and the activation of the human insulin gene transcription caused by 1,25(OH)2D [36]. According to experimental and epidemiological review studies, there was an association of VDRE with presence of IR, 2DM and decreased insulin secretion. Nevertheless, meta-analysis of clinical trial shows no significant effect of vitamin D supplementation on glycemic control [45]. In the present study, a decrease in mean glycated hemoglobin and insulin was found in all groups. Furthermore, there was no presence of 2DM after RYGB. Thus, it is possible that the reduction of body weight and, therefore, reduction of the inflammatory process promoted by obesity, may be associated with the improvement of these variables. Moreover, only patients with preoperative inadequate vitamin D with MUHO showed better results regarding the reduction of glucose that accompanied the increase on serum concentrations of 25(OH)D, which shifted from deficient to insufficient. Additionally, 75% transitioned to the healthy phenotype. Thus, it is suggested that this increase in vitamin D in the post-surgical period may contribute not only to a higher percentage of the MHO cases, but also to glucose reduction. In this sense, it has been reported that this vitamin has the ability to improve glucose homeostasis by optimizing the function of pancreatic β cells, thus increasing insulin secretion [46]. Moreover, it may also be associated with glucose uptake in adipocytes [37], a fact that may justify the present result.
Regarding the variables related to dyslipidemia, a reduction in cholesterol was observed. Besides, in the case of patients classified with vitamin D adequacy together with MUHO, there was also a reduction in dyslipidemia. In this sense, the literature indicates that vitamin D can reduce the accumulation of cholesterol in macrophages, as well as the uptake of LDL in atheroma plaques [47]. Furthermore, through the modulation of inflammatory responses, with reduce expression of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1, and IL-8 of monocytes, f TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1, and IL-8 of monocytes, Vitamina D may influence the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis [48,49]. In addition, it modulates thrombomodulin expression in monocytes, affecting platelet aggregation and thrombogenic activity [50]. However, there are no studies associating dyslipidemia with metabolic phenotypes. Therefore, the present study is the first to find this association. Thus, due to the widely reported metabolic actions of vitamin D, the adequacy of this vitamin in the preoperative period, even in the presence of an unhealthy phenotype, may contribute to the reduction of dyslipidemia and improvement of cholesterol concentrations. Thus, the present study suggests that because of these possible actions of vitamin D, even in the presence of an unhealthy phenotype, preoperative vitamin D adequacy may contribute to dyslipidemia reduction and cholesterol improvement.
It is worth mentioning that this increase of vitamin D may present pleiotropic effects on cardiovascular health, such as nuclear receptor activation in cardiomyocytes, vascular endothelial cells, and regulation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Thus, its deficiency in humans is associated with vascular dysfunction; arterial stiffness; left ventricular hypertrophy, SAH, and dyslipidemia [51,52,53,54]. However, there were no changes in the cases of postoperative SAH.
The present study has the limitation of sample size, however, nonparametric statistical analyses minimize this feature. Furthermore, this is the first study to assess, in a joint manner, the inherent results of vitamin D adequacy together with metabolic phenotypes on remission of CNCDs after RYGB. This fact may contribute to strategies to be implemented preoperatively to minimize the presence of CNCDs in the early postoperative period.

5. Conclusions

Given the results, it was possible to observe that bariatric surgery can negatively influence the achievement of better metabolic profiles, including changes in serum 25(OH)D. These changes were more prominent in those with vitamin D adequacy in the preoperative period since it contributed to dyslipidemia reduction and cholesterol improvement after surgery in both metabolic phenotypes. Additionally, the postoperative increase in 25(OH)D was accompanied by a reduction in glucose in those with vitamin D inadequacy and presence of the MUHO phenotype. Therefore, it is suggested that further research on this topic should be conducted to identify whether adequate preoperative vitamin D in both metabolic phenotypes may contribute to a protective metabolic effect.

Author Contributions

The authors declare that they have contributed equally to this work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital Universitario Clementino Fraga Filho and the Faculty of Medicine of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, under n° 360/60, Research Protocol n° 011/10, on 15 May 2010.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient(s) to publish this paper.

Acknowledgments

We grateful acknowledge the staff of the FAPERJ (Research Support Foundation of the State of Rio de Janeiro), CAPES (Higher Education Personnel Improvement Coordination) and CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development) for their support and assistance to the field work. Special thanks to all the study participants and parents for their contribution.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Associação Brasileira para o estudo da obesidade e síndrome metabólica (ABESO). Diretrizes Brasileiras de Obesidade, 4th ed.; AC farmacêutica: St. Paul, Brazil, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  2. Crewe, C.; An, Y.A.; Scherer, P.E. The ominous triad of adipose tissue dysfunction: Inflammation fibrosis and impaired angiogenesis. J. Clin. Investig. 2017, 127, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Stefan, N.; Schick, F.; Häring, H.U. Causes, Characteristics and Consequences of Metabolically Unhealthy Normal Weight in Humans. Cell Metab. 2017, 29, 292–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Karpe, F.; Pinnick, K.E. Biology of upper-body and lower-body adipose tissue to whole body phenotypes. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2015, 11, 90–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. González-Muniesa, P.; Garcia-Gerique, L.; Quintero, P.; Arriaza, S.; Lopez-Pascual, A.; Martinez, J.A. Effects of Hyperoxia on Oxygen-Related Inflammation with a Focus on Obesity. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2015, 2016, 8957827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Karki, S.; Farb, M.G.; Myers, S.; Apovian, C.; Hess, D.T.; Gokce, N. Effect of Bariatric Weight Loss the Adipose Lipolysis Transcriptome in Obese Humans. Mediators Inflamm. 2015, 2015, 106237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Goday, A.; Benaiges, D.; Parri, A.; Ramón, J.M.; Roux, J.A.F.; Botet, J.P. Can bariatric surgery improve cardiovascular risk factor in the metabolically healthy but morbidly obese patient? Surg. Obes. Relat. Dis. 2014, 10, 871–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Jimenez, A.; Perea, V.; Corcelle, R.; Moizé, V.; Lacy, A.; Vidal, J. Metabolic effects of bariatric surgery in insulin sensitive morbidly obese subjects. Obes. Surg. 2013, 23, 494–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Pelascini, E.; Pasquer, E.D.A.; Poncet, G.; Gouillat, C.; Robert, M. Should we wait for metabolic complications before operating on obese patients? Gastric bypass outcomes in metabolically healthy obese individuals. Surg. Obes. Relat. Dis. 2016, 12, 9–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ricieri, R.A. Consequências das Alterações Gastrointestinais em Indivíduos Submetidos à Cirurgia Bariátrica. Master’s Thesis, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, Brazil, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bloomberg, R.D.; Fleishman, A.; Nalle, J.E.; Herron, D.M.; Kini, S. Nutritional deficiencies following bariatric surgery: What have we learned? Obes. Surg. 2005, 15, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Fandiño, J.; Benchimol, A.K.; Coutinho, W.F.; Appolinário, J.C. Cirurgia Bariátrica: Aspectos Clínico-Cirúrgicos e Psiquiátricos. Rev. Psiquiatr. 2004, 26, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Cordeiro, A.; Santos, A.; Bernardes, M.; Ramalho, A.; Martins, M.J. Vitamin D metabolism in human adipose tissue: Could explain low vitamin D status in obesity? Horm. Mol. Biol. Clin. Investig. 2017, 33, 20170003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Charoenngam, N.; Holick, M.F. Immunologic Effects of Vitamin D on Human Health and Disease. Nutrients 2020, 15, 2097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Holick, M.F.; Binkley, N.C.; Bischoff-Ferrari, H.A.; Gordon, C.M.; Hanley, D.A.; Heaney, R.P. Guidelines for preventing and treating vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency revisited. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 97, 1153–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2019, 42, S182–S183. [Google Scholar]
  17. Xavier, H.T.; Izar, M.C.; Faria Neto, J.R.; Assad, M.H.; Rocha, V.Z.; Sposito, A.C.; Fonseca, F.A.; dos Santos, J.E.; Santos, R.D.; Bertolami, M.C.; et al. V Diretriz brasileira de dislipidemias e prevenção da aterosclerose. Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 2013, 101, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. World Health Organization. Body Mass Index Classification—Report of a WHO Consultation on Obesity; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  19. Dorsey, J.G.; Cooper, W.T. Retention Mechanisms of bonded-phase Liquid Chromatography. Anal. Chem. 1994, 17, 857–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia. 7a Diretriz Brasileira de Hipertensão Arterial. Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 2016, 107, 3. [Google Scholar]
  21. Schaaf, C.; Gugenheim, J. Impact of Preoperative Serum Vitamin D Level on Postoperative Complications and Excess Weight Loss after Gastric Bypass. Obes. Surg. 2017, 27, 1982–1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Leigh, A.; Xiange, Z.; Caufield-Noll, C.P.; Schweitzer, M.A.; Magnuson, T.H.; Steele, K.E. Vitamin D status and supplementation before and after bariatric surgery: A comprehensive literature review. Surg. Obes. Relat. Dis. 2016, 12, 693–702. [Google Scholar]
  23. Holick, M.F. Vitamin D deficiency. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 357, 266–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Karelis, A.D.; Faraj, M.; Bastard, J.P.; Faraj, M.; Bastard, J.P.; St-Pierre, D.H. The metabolically healthy but obese individual presents a favorable inflammation profile. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metabol. 2005, 90, 4145–4150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Karelis, A.D.; Rabasa-Lhoret, R. Characterization of metabolically healthy but obese individuals: Should we add vitamin D to the puzzle? Diabetes Metab. 2014, 40, 319–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Esteghamati, A.; Aryan, Z.; Esteghamati, A.; Nakhjavani, M. Differences in vitamin D concentration between metabolically healthy and unhealthy obese adults: Associations with inflammatory and cardiometabolic markers in 4391 subjects. Diabetes Metab. 2014, 40, 347–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Tosunbayraktar, G.; Bas, M.; Kut, A.; Buyukkaragoz, A.H. Low serum 25(OH)D levels are associated to higher BMI and metabolic syndrome parameters in adult subjects in Turkey. Afr. Health Sci. 2015, 15, 1161–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Harrison, S.R.; Danyang, L.; Jeffery, L.E.; Raza, K.; Hewison, M. Vitamin D, Autoimmune Disease and Rheumatoid Arthritis. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2020, 106, 58–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Miao, Z.; Wang, S.; Wang, Y.; Guo, L.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Y. A Potential Linking between Vitamin D and Adipose Metabolic Disorders. Can. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 2020, 2656321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Krishna, S.M. Vitamin D as A Protector of Arterial Health: Potential Role in Peripheral Arterial Disease Formation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Bartosik-Psujek, H.; Psujek, M. Vitamin D as an immune modulator in multiple sclerosis. Neurol. Neurochi. Pol. 2019, 53, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Haykal, T.; Samji, V.; Zayed, Y.; Gakhal, I.; Dhillon, H.; Kheiri, B. The role of vitamin D supplementation for primary prevention of cancer: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Community Hosp. Intern. Med. Perspect. 2019, 9, 480–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Ricci, C.; Gaeta, M.; Rausa, E.; Asti, E.; Bandera, F.; Bonavina, L. Long-term effects of bariatric surgery on type II diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia: A meta-analysis and meta regression study with 5-year follow-up. Obes. Surg. 2015, 25, 397–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chacko, S.A.; Song, Y.; Manson, J.E.; Van Horn, L.; Eaton, C.; Martin, L.W.; McTiernan, A.; Curb, J.D.; Wylie-Rosett, J.; Phillips, L.S.; et al. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in relation to cardiometabolic risk factors and metabolic syndrome in postmenopausal women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 94, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Grineva, E.N.; Karonova, T.; Micheeva, E.; Belyaeva, O.; Nikitina, I.L. Vitamin D deficiency is a risk factor for obesity and diabetes type 2 in women at late reproductive age. Aging 2013, 5, 575–581. [Google Scholar]
  36. Griz, L.H.; Bandeira, F.; Gabbay, M.A.; Dib, S.A.; Carvalho, E.F. Vitamin D and diabetes mellitus: An update 2013. Arq. Bras. Endocrinol. Metabol. 2014, 58, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Marcotorchino, J.; Gouranton, E.; Romier, B.; Tourniaire, F.; Astier, J.; Malezet, C.; Amiot, M.J.; Landrier, J.F. Vitamin D reduces the inflammatory response and restores glucose uptake in adipocytes. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2012, 56, 1771–1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gao, D.; Trayhurn, P.; Bing, C. Macrophage-secreted factors inhibit ZAG expression and secretion by human adipocytes. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2010, 325, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ching, S.; Kashinkunti, S.; Niehaus, M.D.; Zinser, G.M. Mammary adipocytes bioactivate 25-hydroxyvitamin D₃ and signal via vitamin D₃ receptor, modulating mammary epithelial cell growth. J. Cell Biochem. 2011, 112, 3393–3405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Hewison, M. Vitamin D and innate and adaptive immunity. Vitam. Horm. 2011, 86, 23–62. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  41. Emdin, C.A.; Khera, A.V.; Natarajan, P.; Klarin, D.; Zekavat, S.M.; Hsiao, A.J. Genetic association of waist-to-hip ratio with cardiometabolic traits, type 2 diabetes, and coronary heart disease. JAMA 2017, 317, 626–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Esmaili, H.; Bahreynian, M.; Qorbani, M.; Motlagh, M.E.; Ardalan, G.; Heshmat, R. Prevalenceof general and abdominal obesity in a nationallyrepresentative sample of Iranian children and adolescents: The CASPIAN-IV study. Iran. J. Pediatr. 2015, 25, e401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. MacLean, P.S.; Higgins, J.A.; Johnson, G.C.; Fleming-Elder, B.K.; Donahoo, W.T.; Melanson, E.L. Enhanced metabolic efficiency contributes to weight regain after weight loss in obesity prone rats. Am. J. Physiol. Regul Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2004, 287, R1306–R1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lespessailles, E.; Toumi, H. Vitamin D alteration associated with obesity and bariatric surgery. Exp. Biol. Med. 2017, 242, 1086–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Gustafsson, J.A.; Katzenellenbogen, B.; Jameson, J.L.; Roth, J.; Melmed, S.; McDonnell, D.; Wartofsky, L.; Crowley, W.F., Jr.; Griz, L.H.; Becker, C.; et al. Endocrine Society 2014 Laureate Awards. Horm. Cancer 2014, 5, 339–355. [Google Scholar]
  46. Lips, P.; Eekhoff, M.; van Schoor, N.; Oosterwerff, M.; de Jongh, R.; Krul-Poel, Y. Vitamin D and type 2 diabetes. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2017, 173, 280–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sung, C.C.; Liao, M.T.; Lu, K.C.; Wu, C.C. Role of vitamin D in insulin resistance. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2012, 2012, 634195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Livhits, M.; Mercado, C.; Yermilov, I.; Parikh, J.A.; Dutson, E.; Mehran, A. Preoperative predictors of weight loss following bariatric surgery: Systematic review. Obes. Surg. 2012, 22, 70–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hatoum, I.K.; Greenawalt, D.M.; Cotsapas, C.; Reitman, M.L.; Daly, M.J.; Kaplan, L.M. Heritabilityof the weight loss response to gastric bypass surgery. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 96, E1630–E1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Legro, R.S. Effects of obesity treatment on female reproduction: Results do not match expectations. Fertil. Steril. 2017, 107, 860–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Lotta, L.A.; Wittemans, L.B.L.; Zuber, V.; Stewart, I.D.; Sharp, S.J.; Luan, J. Association of genetic variants related to gluteo femoral vs. abdominal fat distribution with type 2 diabetes, coronary disease, and cardiovascular risk factors. JAMA 2018, 320, 2553–2563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Podzolkov, V.I.; Pokrovskaya, A.E.; Panasenko, O.I. Vitamin D deficiency and cardiovascular pathology. Ter. Arkh. 2018, 90, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Mheid, I.A.; Quyyumi, A.A. Vitamin D and Cardiovascular Disease: Controversy Unresolved. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2017, 70, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wimalawansa, S.J. Vitamin D and cardiovascular diseases: Causality. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2018, 175, 29–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table
Table 1. Means or percentage of inadequacy of body and biochemical variables and presence of chronic noncommunicable diseases considering 25(OH)D ≥ 30 ng/mL together with different metabolic phenotypes before and after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass bariatric surgery.
Table 1. Means or percentage of inadequacy of body and biochemical variables and presence of chronic noncommunicable diseases considering 25(OH)D ≥ 30 ng/mL together with different metabolic phenotypes before and after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass bariatric surgery.
25(OH)D ≥ 30 ng/mL and MHO T025(OH)D ≥ 30 ng/mL and MHO T1 p-Value25(OH)D ≥ 30 ng/mL and MUHO T025(OH)D ≥ 30 ng/mL and MUHO T1p-Value
Body Variables Means/Inadequacy % and reference values
Age44.50 ± 2.8844.50 ± 2.881.00038.00 ± 13.8538.00 ± 13.851.000
Weight135.40 ± 28.29102.15 ± 23.990.245126.25 ± 2.7594.65 ± 12.900.021 *
BMI (kg/m2)44.49 ± 2.2933.51 ± 3.610.021 *45.88 ± 2.7534.26 ± 2.140.021 *
BMI
(Obesity)		100%75%0.046 *100%100%0.018 *
Biochemical Variables
Means and reference values
HOMA IR1.71 ± 0.211.14 ± 0.480.1106.03 ± 3.801.37 ± 0.710.021 *
HOMA BETA 101.15 ± 24.3177.95 ± 24.740.248239.67 ± 229.40172.97 ± 159.150.149
Insulin (2,0 a 17 mcU/mL)7.62 ± 1.102.17 ± 0.810.021 *25.54 ± 15.668.30 ± 7.240.149
Blood Glucose (70–99 mg/dL)87.75 ± 9.9179.25 ± 17.830.56498.50 ± 13.8693.25 ± 16.150.248
Glycated Hemoglobin
(<6.5)		5.15 ± 0.512.30 ± 0.640.020 *5.40 ± 0.243.67 ± 1.100.058
Cholesterol
(<100 mg/dL)		181.25 ± 64.95104.07 ± 36.900.083197.50 ± 48.47120.25 ± 35.520.043 *
LDL
(<100 mg/dL)		107.75 ± 45.7776.00 ± 9.890.08391.25 ± 3.3082.00 ± 13.440.248
HDL [>40 mg/dL ( Nutrients 14 00402 i001); >50 mg/dL ( Nutrients 14 00402 i002)]41.25 ± 9.4243.75 ± 24.850.46840.75 ± 9.7445.50 ± 7.760.309
VLDL (mg/dL)25.75 ± 15.8432.00 ± 20.010.77324.25 ± 15.3714.25 ± 4.340.243
TG
(<150 mg/dL)		109.50 ± 43.7490.75 ± 27.930.245143.00 ± 64.99135.75 ± 73.620.773
25(OH)D (ng/mL)41.32 ± 7.2745.10 ± 8.620.24833.32 ± 1.1427.70 ± 6.600.468
1,25(OH)2D (ng/mL)37.47 ± 1.4150.34 ± 12.890.021 *52.75 ± 11.2952.75 ± 9.140.663
Percentage of Inadequacy
Glucose (mg/dL)25%0%0.28550%50%1.00
Glycated Hemoglobin0.0%0%-0.0%0%-
Insulin0.0%25%0.28516.7%0%0.102
Cholesterol (mg/dL)50%25%0.465100%25%0.028 *
LDL (mg/dL)25%0%0.2850.0%0%-
HDL (mg/dL)75%50%0.46575%50%0.465
TG (mg/dL)25%0%0.28525%25%1.00
Vitamin D [25(OH)D]0.0%0%-0.0%0%-
Chronic Noncommunicable Diseases
Dislipidemia75%50%0.465100%25%0.028 *
Diabetes Mellitus0.0%0%-0.0%0%-
SAH25%25%1.0025%25%1.00
Unhealthy phenotype0.0%0%-100%0%0.005 *
The Mann–Whitney test was used for continuous variables and the Chi-square test for categorical variables (* p ≤ 0.05). Biochemical variables: HDL-c—high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HOMA-IR—homoeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance; LDL-c—low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; VLDL: very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG: triglycerides; 25(OH)D-25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25(OH)2D—1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D. Body variables: BMI—body mass index; Adequate: adequate; Insufficient: insufficient; Def: deficient. SAH: systemic arterial hypertension.
Table
Table 2. Mean or percentage of inadequacy of body and biochemical variables, and presence of chronic noncommunicable diseases considering 25(OH)D < 30 ng/mL together with different metabolic phenotypes before and after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass bariatric surgery.
Table 2. Mean or percentage of inadequacy of body and biochemical variables, and presence of chronic noncommunicable diseases considering 25(OH)D < 30 ng/mL together with different metabolic phenotypes before and after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass bariatric surgery.
25(OH)D < 30 ng/mL and MHO T0 25(OH)D < 30 ng/mL and MHO T1 p-Value25(OH)D < 30 ng/mL and MUHO T025(OH)D < 30 ng/mL and MUHO T1p-Value
Body Variables
Means of Inadequacy and reference values
Age48.80 ± 8.2848.80 ± 8.281.0046.00 ± 10.2146.00 ± 10.211.00
Weight123.24 ± 15.33103.80 ± 91.540.001 *110.50 ± 15.1579.91 ± 10.950.000 *
BMI (kg/m2)40.18 ± 4.7638.59 ± 29.260.001 *39.97 ± 2.7629.05 ± 3.620.000 *
BMI (Obesity)0.0%20%0.136100%25%0.000 *
Biochemical Variables
Means and reference values
HOMA IR1.60 ± 0.574.63 ± 10.010.6464.71 ± 1.526.65 ± 18.710.000 *
HOMA BETA 81.45 ± 40.7668.15 ± 28.510.880196.86 ± 137.24136.40 ± 112.960.078
Insulin
(2,0 a 17 mcU/ml)		8.49 ± 3.424.21 ± 2.770.007 *22.05 ± 4.286.30 ± 5.360.000 *
Blood Glucose (70–99 mg/dL)107.40 ± 34.3791.90 ± 13.110.185107.16 ± 26.6788.75 ± 10.660.022 *
Glycated Hemoglobin
(<6.5)		5.48 ± 0.813.74 ± 1.270.005 *5.76 ± 0.813.61 ± 1.420.001 *
Cholesterol
(<150 mg/dL)		197.80 ± 70.47119.90 ± 30.640.003 *231.91 ± 52.19128.93 ± 44.670.000 *
LDL
(<100 mg/dL)		103.90 ± 37.8192.10 ± 8.150.449149.50 ± 49.99105.41 ± 24.460.043 *
HDL
[>40 mg/dL ( Nutrients 14 00402 i001); >50 mg/dL ( Nutrients 14 00402 i002)]		46.50 ± 13.8154.20 ± 10.660.21242.58 ± 11.3347.06 ± 11.110.285
VLDL (mg/dL)23.90 ± 13.6428.20 ± 27.180.82028.61 ± 16.2431.00 ± 36.640.402
TG
(<150 mg/dL)		243 ± 448.7184.50 ± 23.230.174236.25 ± 322.95141.08 ± 139.840.073
25(OH)D (ng/mL)22.22 ± 5.5327.70 ± 6.600.0717.37 ± 3.5925.26 ± 6.890.001 *
1,25(OH)2D (ng/mL)34.27 ± 10.0638.94 ± 13.360.42645.62 ± 8.3447.12 ± 9.200.644
Percentage of Inadequacy
Blood Glucose (mg/dL)40%20%0.32950%8.3%0.059
Glycated Hemoglobin25%0%0.30575%0%0.064
Insulin0.0%10%0.30583.3%16.7%0.001 *
Cholesterol (mg/dL)80%30%0.025 *83.3%41.7%0.035 *
LDL (mg/dL)50%20%0.16066.7%50%0.408
HDL (mg/dL)60%20%0.06866.7%50%0.408
TG (mg/dL)30%0%0.06041.7%25%0.386
Vitamin D [25(OH)D]100%70%0.060100%75%0.064
Chronic Noncommunicable Diseases
Dislipidemia80%40%0.06891.7%66.7%0.132
Diabetes20%0%0.13625%0%0.064
SAH50%50%1.0025%25%1.00
Unhealthy phenotype0.0%20%0.136100%25%0.000 *
The Mann–Whitney test was used for continuous variables and the Chi-square test for categorical variables (* p ≤ 0.05). Biochemical variables: HDL-c—high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HOMA-IR—homoeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance; LDL-c—low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; VLDL: very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG: triglycerides; 25(OH)D-25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25(OH)2D—1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D. Body variables: BMI—body mass index; A: adequate; Insuf: insufficient; Def: deficient. SAH: systemic arterial hypertension.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

da Cruz, S.P.; Cruz, S.; Pereira, S.; Saboya, C.; Lack Veiga, J.C.; Ramalho, A. Adequacy and Vitamin D in the Preoperative Period of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, Bariatric Surgery, Can Protect Metabolic Health in Metabolically Healthy and Unhealthy Individuals. Nutrients 2022, 14, 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14030402

AMA Style

da Cruz SP, Cruz S, Pereira S, Saboya C, Lack Veiga JC, Ramalho A. Adequacy and Vitamin D in the Preoperative Period of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, Bariatric Surgery, Can Protect Metabolic Health in Metabolically Healthy and Unhealthy Individuals. Nutrients. 2022; 14(3):402. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14030402

Chicago/Turabian Style

da Cruz, Suelem Pereira, Sabrina Cruz, Silvia Pereira, Carlos Saboya, Juliana Castelar Lack Veiga, and Andréa Ramalho. 2022. "Adequacy and Vitamin D in the Preoperative Period of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, Bariatric Surgery, Can Protect Metabolic Health in Metabolically Healthy and Unhealthy Individuals" Nutrients 14, no. 3: 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14030402

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop