Next Article in Journal
The Nutritional Composition of Natural and Organic Branded Food Products: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Greek Foodscape
Next Article in Special Issue
The Impact of the Quality of Nutrition and Lifestyle in the Reproductive Years of Women with PKU on the Long-Term Health of Their Children
Previous Article in Journal
Breastfeeding Practices in the United Arab Emirates: Prenatal Intentions and Postnatal Outcomes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hungry for Change: The Experiences of People with PKU, and Their Caregivers, When Eating Out
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Glycomacropeptide in PKU—Does It Live Up to Its Potential?

Nutrients 2022, 14(4), 807; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14040807
by Anne Daly *, Alex Pinto, Sharon Evans and Anita MacDonald
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Nutrients 2022, 14(4), 807; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14040807
Submission received: 31 December 2021 / Revised: 30 January 2022 / Accepted: 7 February 2022 / Published: 14 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diet Therapy and Nutritional Management of Phenylketonuria)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is a well-done manuscript that brings new information regarding a diet therapy and nutritional manegement of Phenylketonuria.

Abstract is presented in a clear, succinct and direct way. Introduction is clear, containing all the necessary information to understand the objectives of this study. Methodology is clear and straightforward. Results and discussion are clear and in accordance with the objective.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer and Editor 

Thank you for your review, please see the response.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

 

This is a very interesting review on the use of Glyconacropeptide (CGMP) vs Mono Amino Acids (L-AA) in the treatment of phenylketonuria.

The paper is well structured, the reasoning is sounding and the reference are appropriate.

We don’t have any major concerns for the paper.

Author Response

Dear Reviewers and Editor

Thank you for your review. We have made suggested changes.

Please see the response 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop