Efficacy of Vitamin D Supplements in Prevention of Acute Respiratory Infection: A Meta-Analysis for Randomized Controlled Trials
1
Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 07804, Korea
2
Department of Cancer Biomedical Science, National Cancer Center Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, Goyang 10408, Korea
3
Cancer Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Data Science, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Goyang 10408, Korea
4
Department of Family Medicine and Center for Cancer Prevention and Detection, National Cancer Center Hospital, Goyang 10408, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2022, 14(4), 818; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14040818
Submission received: 20 January 2022
/
Revised: 28 January 2022
/
Accepted: 9 February 2022
/
Published: 15 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Micronutrients and Human Health)
Abstract
:Background: Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported inconsistent results regarding the efficacy of vitamin D supplements in the prevention of acute respiratory infections (ARIs). Methods: We investigated these efficacy results by using a meta-analysis of RCTs. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library in June 2021. Results: Out of 390 trials searched from the database, a total of 30 RCTs involving 30,263 participants were included in the final analysis. In the meta-analysis of all the trials, vitamin D supplementation showed no significant effect in the prevention of ARIs (relative risk (RR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91–1.01, I2 = 59.0%, n = 30). In the subgroup meta-analysis, vitamin D supplementation was effective in daily supplementation (RR 0.83, 95% CI, 0.73–0.95, I2 = 69.1%, n = 15) and short-term supplementation (RR 0.83, 95% CI, 0.71–0.97, I2 = 66.8%, n = 13). However, such beneficial effects disappeared in the subgroup meta-analysis of high-quality studies (RR 0.89, 95% CI, 0.78–1.02, I2 = 67.0%, n = 10 assessed by the Jadad scale; RR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.66–1.15, I2 = 51.0%, n = 4 assessed by the Cochrane’s risk of bias tool). Additionally, publication bias was observed. Conclusions: The current meta-analysis found that vitamin D supplementation has no clinical effect in the prevention of ARIs.
1. Introduction
Acute respiratory infection (ARI) is classified into an upper respiratory tract infection (URI) and a lower respiratory tract infection (LRI). URIs include common cold (nasopharyngitis), sinusitis, pharyngitis, laryngitis, and laryngotracheitis [1]. The common cold, as a frequent cause of URIs, is caused by viral infections such as rhinovirus, coronavirus, influenza virus A/B/C, respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza virus, and adenovirus [1]. URIs are a common disease, of which adults experience 2–4 episodes a year on average, and children 7–12 episodes [2]. LRIs are mostly caused by viruses such as the influenza virus and respiratory syncytial virus. Moreover, they are caused by bacterial infections such as S. aureus, S. pneumoniae, and H. influenza, tuberculosis infections, fungal infections, and parasite infections [3]. LRIs have been the fifth leading cause of death and responsibility for mortality in adults older than 70 years worldwide since 1990, accounting for up to 94.6 per 1000 global deaths [4].
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends several useful preventive measures for ARIs such as avoiding close contact with a sick person and practicing hygiene: regular handwashing, covering nose and mouth, or using tissues to contain respiratory droplets or secretions. Vaccination against influenza, pneumococcus, and tuberculosis is also being used for the primary prevention of ARIs. Additionally, although oral zinc, vitamin C supplements, vitamin D supplements, ginseng, and probiotics have been suggested to have a preventive effect on the development of ARIs in some studies, this remains inconclusive [5,6], whereas a meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported that lactoferrin supplements, as one of the key immunomodulatory substances, had efficacy in reducing the risk of RTIs [7].
In the meantime, it has been reported that vitamin D, which has an important role in calcium and bone homeostasis, affects the immune system [8]. From the previous laboratory studies, 1,25(OH)2D, which is an active form of vitamin D, is related to innate and adaptive immunity: it enhances the antibacterial responses of innate immune cells and inhibits T cell proliferation and cytokine excretion from helper T cells, and downregulates chronic T cell-mediated reactions [8,9,10]. Additionally, an animal study showed that vitamin D could suppress influenza virus replication and inflammation in a mouse model [11]. On the contrary, vitamin D deficiency, which is also associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, obesity, or metabolic syndrome, is known to be linked to an increased risk of infections [12].
Furthermore, several RCTs have reported the preventive effects of vitamin D supplements on the incidence of ARIs [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23], while others have reported no effect [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42]. Several meta-analyses reported whether there are beneficial effects [6,43,44,45,46]. However, Pham et al. [44] and Martineau et al.’s [45] meta-analyses investigated the association between 25(OH)D concentration (not supplementation) and the risk of ARIs but lacked the information about actual doses and regimens for vitamin D supplementation.
The current study aimed to investigate whether vitamin D supplementation reduces the risk of ARIs by using a meta-analysis of RCTs. We conducted various subgroup meta-analyses by important factors such as the duration of supplementation, vitamin dosage, and number of study participants.
2. Methods and Materials
2.1. Data Sources and Search
We searched the Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed in order to retrieve articles about the effect of vitamin D supplementation in the prevention of ARIs from inception to June 2021. Common keywords used for searching were as follows: “vitamin D,” for an intervention variable, “respiratory tract infections,” for a disease variable, and “randomized controlled trial” for a study design.
2.2. Data Selection and Quality
We selected RCTs that met all the following criteria: reported the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in the prevention of ARIs; reported outcome measures with dichotomous variables. We excluded studies targeting participants in pregnancy and prenatal periods. Regarding studies using shared data from the identical population, we selected a more comprehensive study or a study with a longer follow-up period. Two authors (H.-E. Cho and H. Cho) independently evaluated the suitability of an individual study using the above-described selection criteria. Discrepancies between authors with the selection were solved with discussion and consultation with the third author (S.-K. Myung).
2.3. Assessment of Risk of Bias
The risk of bias was estimated based on both the Jadad score [47] and the Cochrane risk of bias tool [48] by two authors (H.-E. Cho and H. Cho). Studies were considered as having high quality if they had ≥5 items in the Jadad scale or ≥6 items in the Cochrane risk of bias tool because the mean score for the Jadad scale was 4.5 and the Cochrane risk of bias tool was 5.
2.4. Main and Subgroup Meta-Analysis
In the main analysis, we investigated the association between vitamin D supplementation and the incidence of ARIs as a risk. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to various factors as follows: duration of vitamin D supplementation (≤11 weeks and >11 weeks), dosage (daily, weekly, monthly, >2000 IU, and ≤2000 IU), type of disease (URIs and LRIs), number of the study participants (>1000 vs. ≤1000), region of the study (America, Europe, Asia, and Oceania), mean age (≤18 vs. >18), supply source for supplements (pharmaceutical company vs. non-pharmaceutical company), use of placebo, and quality of the study (Jadad score and Cochrane risk of bias).
2.5. Statistical Analysis
Values in cells of a 2 × 2 table based on an intention-to-treat analysis were used to calculate a relative risk (RR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) in an individual study. Then, we calculated a pooled RR with its 95% CI in the random-effects meta-analysis.
To test the heterogeneity across studies, Higgins I2, which measures the percentage of total variation across studies [49], was used. I2 calculated by a formula as follows
where Q is the Cochrane’s heterogeneity statistic and df means the degree of freedom.
I2 = 100% × (Q − df)/Q
The negative predictive values of the I2 were set at zero. An I2 value ranges from 0% (no observed heterogeneity) to 100% (maximal heterogeneity), and those greater than 50% indicate substantial heterogeneity [50]. In this study, because individual trials were conducted in the different populations, we used a random-effects model meta-analysis.
The publication bias was evaluated by using the Begg’s funnel plot and Egger’s test. If Begg’s funnel plot shows asymmetry or the p-value of the Egger’s test is below 0.05, it indicates the existence of publication bias in the study. We used Stata MP version 17.0 software package (StataCorp., College Station, TX, USA) for all the statistical analyses.
3. Results
3.1. Identification of Relevant Studies
Figure 1 shows how we selected relevant articles, out of a total of 390 articles initially searched from the three databases. After excluding 141 duplicated articles, two authors independently reviewed 249 articles based on the title and abstract. Among them, 196 articles that did not meet the pre-determined selection criteria were excluded. For the remaining 53 articles, we reviewed the full text of the trials and excluded 23 articles because of the following reasons: four articles were irrelevant, five were replies or comments, and 14 had insufficient data. A total of 28 randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials (RDBPCTs) and two open-label, randomized controlled trials (OLRCTs) [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41] were included in the final analysis.
3.2. General Characteristics of Trials
Table 1 shows the general characteristics of the clinical trials included in the final analysis. Studies were published between 2009 and 2021, spanning 12 years. The total number of the study participants were 30,263 with 4259 in an intervention group and 4069 in a control group. The number of the study participants ranged from 49 to 8117. For studies reporting the information of age, the mean age of the participants was 36.6 years old (from 3 to 81). The main outcome measures were URIs (n = 23), LRIs (n = 6), and both URIs and LRIs (n = 1). The periods of supplementation or follow-up ranged from 1 week to 60 weeks.
The dosage regimens for vitamin D supplements used in the trials were as follows: 300, 400, 500, 600, 1000, 1200, 2000, 4000, 10,000 IU daily, 14,000, 50,000 IU weekly, 60,000, 100,000, 120,000, 200,000 IU monthly, 100,000, or 300,000 IU quarterly.
Out of 28 trials reporting their funding sources, eight trials were supplied vitamin D supplements from pharmaceutical companies. The remaining 20 trials were funded by mainly public or governmental organizations or independent scientific foundations.
3.3. Association between Vitamin D Supplementation and Prevention of ARIs
As shown in Figure 2, a random-effects meta-analyses of RCTs showed that vitamin D supplementation did not significantly lower the risk of ARIs (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.91–1.01, I2 = 59.0%, n = 30).
3.4. Quality Assessment
The mean score of all the trials was 4.5 (Table 2) and 5 (Table 3) in the quality assessment based on the Jadad scale and the Cochrane risk of bias tool, respectively. Nineteen studies [13,14,15,16,19,20,21,25,26,27,28,30,34,35,37,39,41,42] were considered as having high quality in the Jadad scale, while 11 [17,18,22,23,24,29,32,33,36,38,40] were considered as having low quality (Table 2). Fourteen studies [14,19,23,25,26,28,29,31,34,35,37,39,40,41] were high-quality studies in the Cochrane risk of bias tool, while the remaining 16 [13,15,16,17,18,20,21,22,23,24,27,30,32,33,36,38,42] were low-quality studies (Table 3).
3.5. Subgroup Meta-Analysis and the Publication Bias
Table 4 shows that vitamin D supplementation was efficacious in the prevention of ARIs in the subgroup meta-analyses by several factors as follows: duration of the study ≤ 11 weeks, daily supplementation, low vitamin D dosage ≤ 2000 IU, and the number of the study population ≤ 1000.
Daily supplementation of vitamin D significantly decreased the risk of ARIs (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73–0.95, I2 = 69.1%, n = 15, Figure 3), while its weekly and monthly supplementation showed no significant association. However, in the subgroup meta-analysis of high-quality studies, beneficial effects of daily vitamin D were not observed (RR 0.89, 95% CI, 0.78–1.02, I2 = 67.0%, n = 10, assessed by the Jadad scale, Figure 3; RR 0.86, 95% CI, 0.65–1.15, I2 = 51.0%, n = 4, assessed by the Cochrane’s risk of bias tool, Figure 4), while beneficial effects remained in low-quality studies (Figure 3 and Figure 4).
In the subgroup meta-analysis by the duration of vitamin D supplementation, the short-term use of vitamin D supplements showed a significant decreased risk of ARIs in the short-term (RR 0.83, 95% CI, 0.71–0.97, I2 = 66.8%, n = 13, Table 4). Similar to daily supplementation of vitamin D, beneficial effects disappeared in the subgroup meta-analysis of high-quality studies (RR 0.88, 95% CI, 0.73–1.05, I2 = 68.7%, n = 9, assessed by the Jadad scale; RR 0.93, 95% CI, 0.74–1.16, I2 = 43.6%, n = 5, assessed by the Cochrane’s risk of bias tool, Table 4), while beneficial effects remained in low-quality studies (Table 4).
As shown in Figure 5, publication bias was observed: the Begg’s funnel plot was asymmetrical, and the Egger’s p for bias was 0.048 (p < 0.05).
4. Discussion
In the current study, we found that the use of vitamin D supplements had no preventive effect on ARIs in the meta-analysis of 30 RCTs. Vitamin D supplementation was efficacious in the prevention of ARIs in the subgroup meta-analyses in daily supplementation and its short-term use. However, the subgroup meta-analyses of the high-quality studies in each category showed that the use of vitamin D supplements has no statistically significant effect in the prevention of ARIs.
There are several biological mechanisms that could explain the preventive effect of vitamin D supplements on ARIs. It has been reported that vitamin D modulates both the adaptive immune and innate immune systems from in vitro studies and animal studies. First, vitamin D could work as a direct and indirect regulator of T cells [7]. Vitamin D regulates T cells directly by inhibiting T cell proliferation, Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and Interferon-γ (INF-γ) transcription, and IL-17 secretion by helper T 17 cells. Additionally, the vitamin D receptor (VDR) is expressed in both the innate and the adaptive immune cells [7]. The VDR mediates 1,25(OH)2D to suppress helper T 1 cell proliferation that produces inflammatory cytokines, thus decreasing the production of INF-γ and IL-2 [51,52]. Moreover, vitamin D induces the development of IL-10 and regulatory T cells [8]. Second, vitamin D fortifies the antibacterial responses of the innate immune response by the toll-like receptors (TLRs) and the 1,25(OH)2D/VDR signaling [7]. The TLRs, which are expressed on macrophages, polymorphonuclear cells, monocytes, and epithelial cells play a key role in the innate immune system [50]. Some of the antimicrobial peptides that demonstrate antiviral effects are associated with the TLRs, and their expression is affected by 1,25(OH)2D [7,50]. In addition, several TLRs are affected by the VDR stimulation [50]. Finally, the gene expression of the antibacterial agents, cathelicidin, and human β-defensin are induced by 1,25(OH)2D/VDR signaling [7]. Cathelicidin is an antimicrobial peptide induced by the TLR 1/2 activation, and human β-defensin acts as a chemoattractant for neutrophils and monocytes [50]. In the animal study, the lungs of the 25(OH)D3-fed mice had a significantly lower viral titer than the lungs of the control mice. After influenza virus infection, the proinflammatory cytokines, IL-5 and INF-γ, significantly decreased in 25(OH)D3-fed mice compared with the control mice. 25(OH)D3 was found to reduce viral replication and inflammatory cytokines, and then decreased the clinical manifestation of influenza virus infection in a mouse model [11]. In other words, vitamin D deficiency is associated with an increased risk of infections of bacterial and viral origin through decreased innate immunity [53].
In the meantime, previous RCTs and meta-analyses have reported inconsistent findings about the preventive effect of vitamin D supplements on ARIs [6,43,44,45,46]. Among them, only one study reported consistent findings with ours [42], and the others reported a preventive effect of vitamin D on ARIs [6,44,45,46]. Xiao et al.’s [43] systematic review in 2015 concluded that there was no efficacy of vitamin D supplementation for the prevention of childhood ARIs. Martineau et al. [44] and Pham et al. [45] reported that high levels of serum 25(OH)D are associated with the prevention of ARIs. Abioye et al. [6] reported that micronutrients including vitamin D, vitamin C, and zinc reduced the occurrence of ARIs and the duration of the symptoms. Jolliffe et al. [46] suggested that although the heterogeneity across the trial was significant, the vitamin D supplementation slightly reduced the risk of ARIs compared to the control group.
Compared to the previous meta-analyses, our study has several strengths. We conducted subgroup meta-analyses by important factors that affect individual results and found out that the preventive effect of vitamin D supplements on ARIs was associated with the quality of the studies. In the subgroup meta-analysis, a significant preventive effect of vitamin D supplementation on ARIS was observed in daily supplementation and in the use of supplements during the short-term period. However, such beneficial effects disappeared in the subgroup meta-analysis of high-quality studies. That is, we think that the inconsistent findings of the previous meta-analyses might be associated with the study quality. Moreover, we used both the Jadad scale and Cochrane risk of bias tool to assess the methodological quality of the trials. Because the Jadad scale, which is a simple tool for assessing study quality, has been criticized by its generic problems of scale, we also used the Cochrane risk of bias tool for accuracy.
There are some limitations in this study. First, it would be ideal to investigate the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation on ARIs considering the baseline concentration of the 25(OH)D. However, this was unavailable in most of the studies included in our analysis. Thus, we could not investigate the differences in the preventive effect on ARIs between people with vitamin D deficiency and normal vitamin D levels. Further clinical trials with the data of baseline 25(OH)D levels are warranted to confirm our findings. Second, publication bias was found in this study, which means that trials showing an increasing risk of or no effect on ARIs by vitamin D supplementation might not be published. This favors our conclusion that there is no preventive effect of vitamin D supplements on ARIs. Finally, several RCTs included in the current study were not designed specifically to investigate the efficacy of vitamin D supplements on ARIs as a primary endpoint. Findings in the secondary endpoint might be due to chance.
5. Conclusions
The current meta-analysis of RCTs shows that the use of vitamin D supplements has no efficacy in the prevention of ARIs.
Author Contributions
S.-K.M. has full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Conceptualization, S.-K.M.; literature search and assessment of study eligibility, H.-E.C. and H.C.; assessment of methodological quality, H.-E.C. and H.C.; statistical analysis and writing—original draft preparation, H.-E.C.; writing—review and editing, S.-K.M. and H.-E.C. All authors read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The authors used published data from the individual studies and declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.
Conflicts of Interest
All authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Grief, S.N. Upper respiratory infections. Prim. Care Clin. Off. Pract. 2013, 40, 757–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barrett, B.T.; Goldman, R.B. Chapter 337: The common cold. In Cecil Medicine, 26th ed.; Goldman, L., Schafer, A.I., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 2150–2152. [Google Scholar]
- Musher, D.M. Chapter 91: Overview of pneumonia. In Cecil Medicine, 26th ed.; Goldman, L., Schafer, A.I., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 592–603. [Google Scholar]
- Troeger, C.; Forouzanfar, M.; Rao, P.C.; Khalil, I.; Brown, A.; Swartz, S.; Fullman, N.; Mosser, J.; Thompson, R.L.; Reiner, R.C., Jr.; et al. Estimates of the global, regional, and national morbidity, mortality, and aetiologies of lower respiratory tract infections in 195 countries: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 1133–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mousa, H.A. Prevention and Treatment of Influenza, Influenza-Like Illness, and Common Cold by Herbal, Complementary, and Natural Therapies. J. Evid. Based Complementary Altern. Med. 2017, 22, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abioye, A.I.; Bromage, S.; Fawzi, W. Effect of micronutrient supplements on influenza and other respiratory tract infections among adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Glob. Health 2021, 6, e003176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sinopoli, A.; Isonne, C.; Santoro, M.M.; Baccolini, V. The effects of orally administered lactoferrin in the prevention and management of viral infections: A systematic review. Rev. Med. Virol. 2022, 32, e2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khammissa, R.A.G.; Fourie, J.; Motswaledi, M.H.; Ballyram, R.; Lemmer, J.; Feller, L. The Biological Activities of Vitamin D and Its Receptor in Relation to Calcium and Bone Homeostasis, Cancer, Immune and Cardiovascular Systems, Skin Biology, and Oral Health. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 9276380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cantorna, M.T.; Snyder, L.; Lin, Y.D.; Yang, L. Vitamin D and 1,25(OH)2D regulation of T cells. Nutrients 2015, 7, 3011–3021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Christakos, S.; Hewison, M.; Gardner, D.G.; Wagner, C.L.; Sergeev, I.N.; Rutten, E.; Pittas, A.G.; Boland, R.; Ferrucci, L.; Bikle, D.D. Vitamin D: Beyond bone. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2013, 1287, 45–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayashi, H.; Okamatsu, M.; Ogasawara, H.; Tsugawa, N.; Isoda, N.; Matsuno, K.; Sakoda, Y. Oral Supplementation of the Vitamin D Metabolite 25(OH)D3 Against Influenza Virus Infection in Mice. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adenote, A.; Dumic, I.; Madrid, C.; Barusya, C.; Nordstrom, C.W.; Rueda Prada, L. NAFLD and Infection, a Nuanced Relationship. Can. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 2021, 5556354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laaksi, I.; Ruohola, J.P.; Mattila, V.; Auvinen, A.; Ylikomi, T.; Pihlajamaki, H. Vitamin D supplementation for the prevention of acute respiratory tract infection: A randomized, double-blinded trial among young Finnish men. J. Infect. Dis. 2010, 202, 809–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Urashima, M.; Segawa, T.; Okazaki, M.; Kurihara, M.; Wada, Y.; Ida, H. Randomized trial of vitamin D supplementation to prevent seasonal influenza A in schoolchildren. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 91, 1255–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Camargo, C.A., Jr.; Ganmaa, D.; Frazier, A.L.; Kirchberg, F.F.; Stuart, J.J.; Kleinman, K.; Sumberzul, N.; Rich-Edwards, J.W. Randomized trial of vitamin D supplementation and risk of acute respiratory infection in Mongolia. Pediatrics 2012, 130, 561–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Goodall, E.C.; Granados, A.C.; Luinstra, K.; Pullenayegum, E.; Coleman, B.L.; Loeb, M.; Smieja, M. Vitamin D3 and gargling for the prevention of upper respiratory tract infections: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Infect. Dis. 2014, 273, 1471–2334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Slow, S.; Priest, P.; Chambers, S.; Stewart, A.; Jennings, L.; Florkowski, C.; Livesey, J.; Camargo, C.; Scragg, R.; Murdoch, D. Effect of vitamin D3 supplementation on Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in healthy adults. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2014, 20, 453–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bergman, P.; Norlin, A.C.; Hansen, S.; Bjorkhem-Bergman, L. Vitamin D supplementation to patients with frequent respiratory tract infections: A post hoc analysis of a randomized and placebo-controlled trial. BMC Res. Notes 2015, 8, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ginde, A.A.; Blatchford, P.; Breese, K.; Zarrabi, L.; Linnebur, S.A.; Wallace, J.I.; Schwartz, R.S. High-Dose Monthly Vitamin D for Prevention of Acute Respiratory Infection in Older Long-Term Care Residents: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2017, 65, 496–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hibbs, A.M.; Ross, K.; Kerns, L.A.; Wagner, C.; Fuloria, M.; Groh-Wargo, S.; Zimmerman, T.; Minich, N.; Tatsuoka, C. Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Recurrent Wheezing in Black Infants Who Were Born Preterm: The D-Wheeze Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2018, 319, 2086–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shimizu, Y.; Ito, Y.; Yui, K.; Egawa, K.; Orimo, H. Intake of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 Reduces Duration and Severity of Upper Respiratory Tract Infection: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Comparison Study. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2018, 22, 491–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhou, J.; Du, J.; Huang, L.; Wang, Y.; Shi, Y.; Lin, H. Preventive Effects of Vitamin D on Seasonal Influenza A in Infants: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open, Controlled Clinical Trial. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2018, 37, 749–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arihiro, S.; Nakashima, A.; Matsuoka, M.; Suto, S.; Uchiyama, K.; Kato, T.; Mitobe, J.; Komoike, N.; Itagaki, M.; Miyakawa, Y.; et al. Randomized Trial of Vitamin D Supplementation to Prevent Seasonal Influenza and Upper Respiratory Infection in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2019, 25, 1088–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li-Ng, M.; Aloia, J.F.; Pollack, S.; Cunha, B.A.; Mikhail, M.; Yeh, J.; Berbari, N. A randomized controlled trial of vitamin D3 supplementation for the prevention of symptomatic upper respiratory tract infections. Epidemiol. Infect. 2009, 137, 1396–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Manaseki-Holland, S.; Maroof, Z.; Bruce, J.; Mughal, M.Z.; Masher, M.I.; Bhutta, Z.A.; Walraven, G.; Chandramohan, D. Effect on the incidence of pneumonia of vitamin D supplementation by quarterly bolus dose to infants in Kabul: A randomised controlled superiority trial. Lancet 2012, 379, 1419–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Murdoch, D.R.; Slow, S.; Chambers, S.T.; Jennings, L.C.; Stewart, A.W.; Priest, P.C.; Florkowski, C.M.; Livesey, J.H.; Camargo, C.A.; Scragg, R. Effect of Vitamin D3 Supplementation on Upper Respiratory Tract Infections in Healthy Adults: The VIDARIS Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA 2012, 308, 1333–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Rees, J.R.; Hendricks, K.; Barry, E.L.; Peacock, J.L.; Mott, L.A.; Sandler, R.S.; Bresalier, R.S.; Goodman, M.; Bostick, R.M.; Baron, J.A. Vitamin D3 supplementation and upper respiratory tract infections in a randomized, controlled trial. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2013, 57, 1384–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Urashima, M.; Mezawa, H.; Noya, M.; Camargo, C.A., Jr. Effects of vitamin D supplements on influenza A illness during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic: A randomized controlled trial. Food Funct. 2014, 5, 2365–2370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Martineau, A.R.; Hanifa, Y.; Witt, K.D.; Barnes, N.C.; Hooper, R.; Patel, M.; Stevens, N.; Enayat, Z.; Balayah, Z.; Syed, A.; et al. Double-blind randomised controlled trial of vitamin D3 supplementation for the prevention of acute respiratory infection in older adults and their carers (ViDiFlu). Thorax 2015, 70, 953–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Martineau, A.R.; James, W.Y.; Hooper, R.; Barnes, N.C.; Jolliffe, D.A.; Greiller, C.L.; Islam, K.; McLaughlin, D.; Bhowmik, A.; Timms, P.; et al. Vitamin D 3 supplementation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ViDiCO): A multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir. Med. 2015, 3, 120–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martineau, A.R.; MacLaughlin, B.D.; Hooper, R.L.; Barnes, N.C.; Jolliffe, D.A.; Greiller, C.L.; Kilpin, K.; McLaughlin, D.; Fletcher, G.; Mein, C.A.; et al. Double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial of bolus-dose vitamin D3 supplementation in adults with asthma (ViDiAs). Thorax 2015, 70, 451–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mayan, I.; Somech, R.; Lev, A.; Cohen, A.H.; Constantini, N.W.; Dubnov-Raz, G. Thymus Activity, Vitamin D, and Respiratory Infections in Adolescent Swimmers. Isr. Med. Assoc. J. 2015, 17, 571–575. [Google Scholar]
- Denlinger, L.C.; King, T.S.; Cardet, J.C.; Craig, T.; Holguin, F.; Jackson, D.J.; Kraft, M.; Peters, S.P.; Ross, K.; Sumino, K.; et al. Vitamin D Supplementation and the Risk of Colds in Patients with Asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2016, 193, 634–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Gupta, P.; Dewan, P.; Shah, D.; Sharma, N.; Bedi, N.; Kaur, I.R.; Bansal, A.K.; Madhu, S.V. Vitamin D Supplementation for Treatment and Prevention of Pneumonia in Under-five Children: A Randomized Double-blind Placebo Controlled Trial. Indian Pediatr. 2016, 53, 967–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aglipay, M.; Birken, C.S.; Parkin, P.C.; Loeb, M.B.; Thorpe, K.; Chen, Y.; Laupacis, A.; Mamdani, M.; MacArthur, C.; Hoch, J.S.; et al. Effect of High-Dose vs Standard-Dose Wintertime Vitamin D Supplementation on Viral Upper Respiratory Tract Infections in Young Healthy Children. JAMA 2017, 318, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brett, N.R.; Lavery, P.; Agellon, S.; Vanstone, C.A.; Goruk, S.; Field, C.J.; Weiler, H.A. Vitamin D Status and Immune Health Outcomes in a Cross-Sectional Study and a Randomized Trial of Healthy Young Children. Nutrients 2018, 10, 680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Loeb, M.; Dang, A.D.; Thiem, V.D.; Thanabalan, V.; Wang, B.; Nguyen, N.B.; Tran, H.T.M.; Luong, T.M.; Singh, P.; Smieja, M.; et al. Effect of Vitamin D supplementation to reduce respiratory infections in children and adolescents in Vietnam: A randomized controlled trial. Influenza Other Respir. Viruses 2019, 13, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Singh, N.; Kamble, D.; Mahantshetti, N.S. Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation in the Prevention of Recurrent Pneumonia in Under-Five Children. Indian J. Pediatr. 2019, 86, 1105–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Camargo, C.A.; Sluyter, J.; Stewart, A.W.; Khaw, K.T.; Lawes, C.M.; Toop, L.; Waayer, D.; Scragg, R. Effect of Monthly High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation on Acute Respiratory Infections in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ganmaa, D.; Uyanga, B.; Zhou, X.; Gantsetseg, G.; Delgerekh, B.; Enkhmaa, D.; Khulan, D.; Ariunzaya, S.; Sumiya, E.; Bolortuya, B.; et al. Vitamin D Supplements for Prevention of Tuberculosis Infection and Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 359–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sudfeld, C.R.; Mugusi, F.; Muhihi, A.; Aboud, S.; Nagu, T.J.; Ulenga, N.; Hong, B.; Wang, M.; Fawzi, W.W. Efficacy of vitamin D3 supplementation for the prevention of pulmonary tuberculosis and mortality in HIV: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet HIV 2020, 7, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pham, H.; Waterhouse, M.; Baxter, C.; Romero, B.D.; McLeod, D.S.; Armstrong, B.K.; Ebeling, P.R.; English, D.R.; Hartel, G.; Kimlin, M.G.; et al. The effect of vitamin D supplementation on acute respiratory tract infection in older Australian adults: An analysis of data from the D-Health Trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021, 9, 69–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, L.; Xing, C.; Yang, Z.; Xu, S.; Wang, M.; Du, H.; Liu, K.; Huang, Z. Vitamin D supplementation for the prevention of childhood acute respiratory infections: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Br. J. Nutr. 2015, 114, 1026–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Martineau, A.R.; Jolliffe, D.A.; Greenberg, L.; Aloia, J.F.; Bergman, P.; Dubnov-Raz, G.; Esposito, S.; Ganmaa, D.; Ginde, A.A.; Goodall, E.C.; et al. Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory infections: Individual participant data meta-analysis. Health Technol. Assess. 2019, 23, 1–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pham, H.; Rahman, A.; Majidi, A.; Waterhouse, M.; Neale, R.E. Acute Respiratory Tract Infection and 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jolliffe, D.A.; Camargo, C.A., Jr.; Sluyter, J.D.; Aglipay, M.; Aloia, J.F.; Ganmaa, D.; Bergman, P.; Bischoff-Ferrari, H.A.; Borzutzky, A.; Damsgaard, C.T. Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis of aggregate data from randomised controlled trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021, 9, 276–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jadad, A.R.; Moore, R.A.; Carroll, D.; Jenkinson, C.; Reynolds, D.J.; Gavaghan, D.J. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? Control. Clin. Trials. 1996, 17, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Higgins, J.P.T.; Savovic, J.; Page, M.J.; Elbers, R.G.; Sterne, J.A.C. Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial. In Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions; Higgins, J.P.T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M.J., Welch, V.A., Eds.; Wiley-Blackwell: Chichester, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Higgins, J.P.; Thompson, S.G. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat. Med. 2002, 21, 1539–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Reid, I.R.; Ames, R.W.; Evans, M.C.; Gamble, G.D.; Sharpe, S.J. Long-term effects of calcium supplementation on bone loss and fractures in postmenopausal women: A randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Med. 1995, 98, 331–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beard, J.A.; Bearden, A.; Striker, R. Vitamin D and the anti-viral state. J. Clin. Virol. 2011, 50, 194–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, R.; Christakos, S. Mechanisms Underlying the Regulation of Innate and Adaptive Immunity by Vitamin D. Nutrients 2015, 7, 8251–8260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- White, J.H. Emerging Roles of Vitamin D-Induced Antimicrobial Peptides in Antiviral Innate Immunity. Nutrients 2022, 14, 284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1.
Flow Diagram for selection of relevant clinical trials.
Figure 2.
Efficacy of vitamin D supplements in prevention of acute respiratory infections in a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (n = 30) [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42]. RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval; A, trial of vitamin D supplementation for prevention of Influenza (ViDiFlu); B, vitamin D3 supplementation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ViDiCO); C, vitamin D3 supplementation in adults with asthma (ViDiAs).
Figure 2.
Efficacy of vitamin D supplements in prevention of acute respiratory infections in a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (n = 30) [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42]. RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval; A, trial of vitamin D supplementation for prevention of Influenza (ViDiFlu); B, vitamin D3 supplementation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ViDiCO); C, vitamin D3 supplementation in adults with asthma (ViDiAs).
Figure 3.
Efficacy of daily supplementation of vitamin D in prevention of acute respiratory infections and its efficacy in subgroup meta-analysis by quality of the study assessed by the Jadad scale [13,14,15,16,18,20,21,22,23,24,27,28,32,35,36]. RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 4.
Efficacy of daily supplementation of vitamin D in prevention of acute respiratory infections in subgroup meta-analysis by quality of the study assessed by Cochrane’s risk of bias tool [13,14,15,16,18,20,21,22,23,24,27,28,32,35,36]. RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 5.
Begg’s funnel plot and Egger’s test for identifying publication bias of randomized controlled trials. RR, relative risk; S.E, standard error.
Figure 5.
Begg’s funnel plot and Egger’s test for identifying publication bias of randomized controlled trials. RR, relative risk; S.E, standard error.
Table 1.
Characteristics of trials included in the final meta-analysis (n = 30).
| Study | Region | Study Design (Type of Prevention) | Participants (Average Age, y; Women, %) | Duration of Supplementation, w (Follow-Up Period, w) | Intervention vs. Control | Main Outcome Measures | No. of Patients with Acute Respiratory Infection /No. of Study Participants | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supplement Group | Control Group | ||||||||
| 1 | 2009, Li-Ng et al. [24] | U.S. | RDBPCT | 148 healthy adults (59; 80) | 3 (3) | Vitamin D (2000 IU/d) vs. placebo | URI symptoms | 28/78 | 29/70 |
| 2 | 2010, Laaksi et al. [13] | Finland | RDBPCT | 164 healthy young men with military training (n.a.; 0) | 6 (6) | Vitamin D (400 IU/d) vs. placebo | common cold symptoms | 45/80 | 44/84 |
| 3 | 2010, Urashima et al. [14] | Japan | RDBPCT | 334 Children (10; 44) | 4 (4) | Vitamin D (1200 IU/d) vs. placebo | Influenza A infection | 18/167 | 31/167 |
| 4 | 2012, Camargo et al. [15] | Mongolia | RDBPCT | 244 Children (10; 48) | 3 (3) | Vitamin D (300 IU/d) + milk vs. milk | Acute respiratory infection | 31/141 | 52/103 |
| 5 | 2012, Manaseki et al. [25] | Afghanistan | RDBPCT | 3046 healthy infants (n.a.; 48) | 18 (18) | Vitamin D (100,000 IU/3 m) vs. placebo | pneumonia with CXR | 260/1524 | 245/1522 |
| 6 | 2012, Murdoch et al. [26] | New Zealand | RDBPCT | 322 healthy adults (48; 75) | 18 (18) | Vitamin D (100,000 IU/m) vs. placebo | URI symptoms | 154/161 | 155/161 |
| 7 | 2013, Rees et al. [27] | n.a. | RDBPCT | 759 healthy adults with history of colorectal adenoma (58; 42) | n.a. | Vitamin D (1000 IU/d) vs. placebo | URI symptoms | 303/399 | 276/360 |
| 8 | 2014, Goodall et al. [16] | U.S. | RDBPCT | 492 healthy students (19; 64) | 1 (1) | Vitamin D (10,000 IU/d) vs. placebo | URI symptoms | 70/258 | 80/234 |
| 9 | 2014, Slow et al. [17] | New Zealand | RDBPCT | 207 non-S. aureus nasal carriage adults (48; 75) | 18 (18) | Vitamin D (100,000 IU/m) vs. placebo | S. aureus nasal carriage, culture positive | 28/110 | 17/97 |
| 10 | 2014, Urashima et al. [28] | Japan | RDBPCT | 247 adolescents never have Influenza A (n.a.; 34) | 2 (2) | Vitamin D (2000 IU/d) vs. placebo | Influenza-like illness | 32/148 | 17/99 |
| 11 | 2015, Bergman et al. [18] | Sweden | RDBPCT | 124 patients with primary immunodeficiency (n.a.; n.a.) | 12 (12) | Vitamin D (4000 IU/d) vs. placebo | URI symptoms | 26/62 | 39/62 |
| 12 | 2015, Martineau et al. A (ViDiFlu) [29] | U.K. | RDBPCT | 217 residents of sheltered accommodation housing blocks (67; 66) | 12 (12) | Vitamin D (120,000 IU/2 m + 400 IU/d) vs. Vitamin D ( 400 IU/d) + placebo | ARI symptoms | 83/125 | 58/92 |
| 13 | 2015, Martineau et al. B (ViDiCO) [30] | U.K. | RDBPCT | 205 patients with COPD, emphysema, chronic bronchitis (65; 40) | 12 (12) | Vitamin D (120,000 IU/2 m) vs. placebo | URI symptoms | 76/102 | 75/103 |
| 14 | 2015, Martineau et al. C (ViDiAs) [31] | U.K. | RDBPCT | 232 patients with asthma (48; 57) | 12 (12) | Vitamin D (120,000 IU/2 m) vs. placebo | URI symptoms | 85/115 | 93/117 |
| 15 | 2015, Mayan et al. [32] | Israel | RDBPCT | 55 adolescent swimmers (15; 36) | 12 (12) | Vitamin D (2000 IU/d) vs. placebo | URI symptoms | 11/28 | 11/27 |
| 16 | 2016, Denlinger et al. [33] | n.a. | RDBPCT | 408 patients with asthma (n.a.) | 28 (28) | Vitamin D (4000 IU/d) vs. placebo | URI symptoms | 161/201 | 139/207 |
| 17 | 2016, Gupta et al. [34] | India | RDBPCT | 314 children with pneumonia (12 m; 30) | once (6) | Vitamin D (100,000 IU) vs. placebo | pneumonia | 39/156 | 36/158 |
| 18 | 2017, Aglipay et al. [35] | Canada | RDBPCT | 703 healthy children (3; 42) | 4–8 (4–8) | Vitamin D (2000 IU/d + 400 IU/d) vs. Vitamin D (400 IU/d) | URI | 184/349 | 193/354 |
| 19 | 2017, Ginde et al. [19] | U.S. | RDBPCT | 107 long term care residents (81; 58) | 12 (12) | Vitamin D (100,000 IU/m) vs. Vitamin D (1200 IU/m) | URI symptoms | 17/55 | 24/52 |
| 20 | 2018, Brett et al. [36] | Canada | OLRCT | 49 healthy children (6; 47) | 3 (3) | Vitamin D fortified food (600 IU/d) vs. placebo | common cold symptoms | 13/25 | 14/24 |
| 21 | 2018, Hibbs et al. [20] | U.S. | RDBPCT | 306 preterm black infants (n.a.; 67) | 6 (12) | Vitamin D (400 IU/d) vs. placebo | URI | 84/153 | 83/153 |
| 22 | 2018, Shimizu et al. [21] | Japan | RDBPCT | 215 healthy adults (54; 69) | 16 (16) | Vitamin D (400 IU/d) vs. placebo | URI symptoms | 41/110 | 43/105 |
| 23 | 2018, Zhou et al. [22] | China | OLRCT | 332 healthy infants (8; 48) | 4 (4) | Vitamin D (1200 IU/d + 400 IU/d) vs. Vitamin D (400 IU/d) | Influenza A | 43/164 | 78/168 |
| 24 | 2019, Arihiro et al. [23] | Japan | RDBPCT | 223 patients with IBD (45; 39) | 6 (6) | Vitamin D (500 IU/d) vs. placebo | URI symptoms | 19/108 | 30/115 |
| 25 | 2019, Loeb et al. [37] | Vietnam | RDBPCT | 1300 healthy children and adolescent (9; 52) | 8 (8) | Vitamin D (14,000 IU/w) vs. placebo | Influenza A or B | 50/650 | 43/650 |
| 26 | 2019, Singh et al. [38] | n.a. | OLRCT | 100 children with pneumonia (n.a.; 42) | 8 (12) | Vitamin D (300,000/3 m) + milk vs. placebo + milk | LRI symptoms | 28/50 | 34/50 |
| 27 | 2020, Camargo et al. [39] | New Zealand | RDBPCT | 5056 healthy adults (66; 42) | 19.2 (19.2) | Vitamin D (100,000 IU/m) vs. placebo | ARI symptoms | 1882/2539 | 1855/2517 |
| 28 | 2020, Ganmaa et al. [40] | Mongolia | RDBPCT | 8117 children without TB (9; 49) | 36 (36) | Vitamin D (14,000 IU/w) vs. placebo | Pulmonary TB, QFT results | 147/4074 | 134/4043 |
| 29 | 2020, Sudfeld et al. [41] | Tanzania | RDBPCT | 3639 patients with HIV with ART (39; 32) | 12 (12) | Vitamin D (50,000 IU/w than 2000 IU/d) vs. placebo | Pulmonary TB | 50/1812 | 64/1827 |
| 30 | 2021, Pham et al. [42] | Australia | RDBPCT | 2598 healthy adults (n.a.; 51) | 60 (60) | Vitamin D (60,000 IU/m) vs. placebo | ARI symptoms | 410/1318 | 404/1280 |
n.a., not available; RDBPCT, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial; OLRCT, open-label, randomized, controlled trial; URI, upper respiratory tract infection; LRI, lower respiratory tract infection; ARI; acute respiratory infection; TB, tuberculosis; CXR, chest X-ray; QFT, QuantiFERON-TB; ART, antiretroviral therapy; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; A (ViDiFlu), trial of vitamin D supplementation for prevention of Influenza; B (ViDiCO), vitamin D3 supplementation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; C (ViDiAs), vitamin D3 supplementation in adults with asthma.
Table 2.
Methodological quality of trials based on the Jadad scale (n = 30).
| Study | Randomization | Description of Randomization Methods | DOUBLE-BLIND | Using Identical Placebo | Follow-Up Reporting | Total Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009, Li-Ng et al. [24] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| 2 | 2010, Laaksi et al. [13] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| 3 | 2010, Urashima et al. [14] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| 4 | 2012, Camargo et al. [15] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| 5 | 2012, Manaseki et al. [25] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| 6 | 2012, Murdoch et al. [26] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| 7 | 2013, Rees et al. [27] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| 8 | 2014, Goodall et al. [16] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| 9 | 2014, Slow et al. [17] | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 10 | 2014, Urashima et al. [28] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| 11 | 2015, Bergman et al. [18] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| 12 | 2015, Martineau et al. A (ViDiFlu) [29] | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 13 | 2014, Martineau et al. B (ViDiCO) [30] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| 14 | 2015, Martineau et al. C (ViDiAs) [31] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| 15 | 2015, Mayan et al. [32] | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 16 | 2016, Denlinger et al. [33] | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 17 | 2016, Gupta et al. [34] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| 18 | 2017, Aglipay et al. [35] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| 19 | 2017, Ginde et al. [19] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| 20 | 2018, Brett et al. [36] | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2018, Hibbs et al. [20] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| 22 | 2018, Shimizu et al. [21] | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| 23 | 2018, Zhou et al. [22] | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| 24 | 2019, Arihiro et al. [23] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| 25 | 2019, Loeb et al. [37] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| 26 | 2019, Singh et al. [38] | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 27 | 2020, Camargo et al. [39] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| 28 | 2020, Ganmaa et al. [40] | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 29 | 2020, Sudfeld et al. [41] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| 30 | 2021, Pham et al. [42] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Table 3.
Methodological quality of trials based on the Cochrane risk of bias tool (n = 30).
| Study | Random Sequence Generation | Allocation Concealment | Blinding of Participants and Personnel | Blinding of Outcome Assessment | Incomplete Outcome Data | Selective Reporting | Other Bias | No. of Low Risk of Bias |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009, Li-Ng et al. [24] | Low | Unclear | Low | High | Low | Low | Low | 5 |
| 2010, Laaksi et al. [13] | Low | Low | Unclear | Low | Unclear | Low | Low | 5 |
| 2010, Urashima et al. [14] | Low | Low | Low | Low | Unclear | Low | Low | 6 |
| 2012, Camargo et al. [15] | Low | Low | Low | Unclear | Low | Unclear | Low | 5 |
| 2012, Manaseki et al. [25] | Low | Low | Low | Low | Unclear | Low | Low | 6 |
| 2012, Murdoch et al. [26] | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | 7 |
| 2013, Rees et al. [27] | Low | Low | Low | High | Unclear | Low | Low | 5 |
| 2014, Goodall et al. [16] | Low | Low | Low | Low | Unclear | Unclear | Low | 5 |
| 2014, Slow et al. [17] | Unclear | Unclear | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | 5 |
| 2014, Urashima et al. [28] | Low | Low | Low | Unclear | Low | Low | Low | 6 |
| 2015, Bergman et al. [18] | Low | Low | Low | Low | Unclear | Unclear | Low | 5 |
| 2015, Martineau et al. A (ViDiFlu) [29] | Low | Unclear | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | 6 |
| 2014, Martineau et al. B (ViDiCO) [30] | Low | Unclear | Low | Unclear | Low | Low | Low | 5 |
| 2015, Martineau et al. C (ViDiAs) [31] | Low | Low | Low | Unclear | Low | Low | Low | 6 |
| 2015, Mayan et al. [32] | Unclear | High | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Low | Low | 2 |
| 2016, Denlinger et al. [33] | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Low | Low | 2 |
| 2016, Gupta et al. [34] | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | 7 |
| 2017, Aglipay et al. [35] | Low | Low | Low | Low | Unclear | Low | Low | 6 |
| 2017, Ginde et al. [19] | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | 7 |
| 2018, Brett et al. [36] | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Low | Low | 2 |
| 2018, Hibbs et al. et al. [20] | Low | Unclear | Low | Unclear | Low | Low | Low | 5 |
| 2018, Shimizu et al. [21] | Low | Low | Low | Unclear | Unclear | Low | Low | 5 |
| 2018, Zhou et al. [22] | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Low | Low | 2 |
| 2019, Arihiro et al. [23] | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | 7 |
| 2019, Loeb et al. [37] | Low | Low | Low | Low | Unclear | Low | Low | 6 |
| 2019, Singh et al. [38] | Unclear | Low | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Low | Low | 3 |
| 2020, Camargo et al. [39] | Low | Low | Low | Unclear | Low | Low | Low | 6 |
| 2020, Ganmaa et al. [40] | Low | Unclear | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | 6 |
| 2020, Sudfeld et al. [41] | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | 7 |
| 2021, Pham et al. [42] | Low | Low | Low | Unclear | Unclear | Low | Low | 5 |
Table 4.
Vitamin D supplementation in prevention of acute respiratory infections in the subgroup meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by various factors.
Table 4.
Vitamin D supplementation in prevention of acute respiratory infections in the subgroup meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by various factors.
| Factors | No. of Trials | Summary RR (95% CI) | Heterogeneity, I2 (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| All | 30 | 0.96 (0.91–1.01) | 59.0 |
| Duration of Vitamin D supplementation | |||
| Long term | 15 | 1.01 (0.9–1.06) | 38.1 |
| Short term | 13 | 0.83 (0.71–0.97) * | 66.8 |
| Jadad score | |||
| High quality | 9 | 0.88 (0.73–1.05) | 68.7 |
| Low quality | 4 | 0.71 (0.57–0.89) * | 26.7 |
| Cochrane ROB | |||
| High quality | 5 | 0.93 (0.74–1.16) | 43.6 |
| Low quality | 8 | 0.78 (0.64–0.97) * | 72.9 |
| Regimen | |||
| Daily | 15 | 0.83 (0.73–0.95) * | 69.1 |
| Jadad score | |||
| High quality | 10 | 0.89 (0.78–1.02) | 67.0 |
| Low quality | 5 | 0.69 (0.58–0.82) * | 0.0 |
| Cochrane ROB | |||
| High quality | 4 | 0.87 (0.66–1.15) | 51.0 |
| Low quality | 11 | 0.81 (0.69–0.96) * | 74.9 |
| Weekly | 3 | 1.10 (0.95–1.26) | 25.0 |
| Monthly | 10 | 1.00 (0.98–1.02) | 0.0 |
| Dose | |||
| High does (>2000 IU) | 8 | 0.95 (0.88–1.02) | 57.3 |
| Low dose (≤2000 IU) | 20 | 0.92 (0.85–1.00) * (0.997) | 59.5 |
| Type of Disease | |||
| URI | 24 | 0.97 (0.91–1.03) | 53.9 |
| LRI | 7 | 1.00 (0.91–1.11) | 0.0 |
| Number of study participants | |||
| >1000 | 6 | 1.00 (0.98–1.04) | 0.0 |
| ≤1000 | 24 | 0.92 (0.85–0.99) * | 68.7 |
| Region | |||
| America (Canada, U.S.) | 6 | 0.93 (0.84–1.03) | 0.0 |
| Europe (Finland, Sweden, UK) | 5 | 0.97 (0.86–1.09) | 36.9 |
| Asia (Afghanistan, China, India, Israel, Japan, Mongolia, Vietnam) | 11 | 0.85 (0.69–1.05) | 74.3 |
| Oceania (Australia, New Zealand) | 4 | 1.00 (0.98–1.03 | 0.0 |
| Type of prevention | |||
| Primary prevention | 26 | 0.94 (0.89–0.99) * | 58.5 |
| Secondary prevention | 4 | 1.05 (0.92–1.21) | 59.2 |
| Mean age | |||
| Children | 12 | 0.87 (0.75–1.02) | 70.9 |
| Adults | 18 | 0.99 (0.95–1.04) | 41.1 |
| Funding source | |||
| Pharmaceutical company | 8 | 0.99 (0.93–1.04) | 0.0 |
| Not pharmaceutical company | 22 | 0.94 (0.87–1.00) | 69.9 |
| Use of placebo | 29 | 0.98 (0.94–1.02) | 44.2 |
| Quality | |||
| Jadad score | |||
| High quality (≥5) | 18 | 1.00 (0.97–1.02) | 0.0 |
| Low quality (<5) | 12 | 0.85 (0.69–1.04) | 80.6 |
| Cochrane ROB | |||
| High quality (>5) | 14 | 1.00 (0.96–1.03) | 10.9 |
| Low quality (≤5) | 16 | 0.90 (0.81–1.01) | 73.5 |
ARI, acute respiratory infection; RCT, randomized controlled trials; RR, relative risk; ROB, risk of bias; URI, upper respiratory tract infection; LRI, lower respiratory tract infection; CI, confidence interval. * Indicates a statistically significant association.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Cho, H.-E.; Myung, S.-K.; Cho, H. Efficacy of Vitamin D Supplements in Prevention of Acute Respiratory Infection: A Meta-Analysis for Randomized Controlled Trials. Nutrients 2022, 14, 818. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14040818
AMA Style
Cho H-E, Myung S-K, Cho H. Efficacy of Vitamin D Supplements in Prevention of Acute Respiratory Infection: A Meta-Analysis for Randomized Controlled Trials. Nutrients. 2022; 14(4):818. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14040818
Chicago/Turabian StyleCho, Hae-Eun, Seung-Kwon Myung, and Herim Cho. 2022. "Efficacy of Vitamin D Supplements in Prevention of Acute Respiratory Infection: A Meta-Analysis for Randomized Controlled Trials" Nutrients 14, no. 4: 818. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14040818
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
