Next Article in Journal
Dietary Acid Load and Cancer Risk: A Review of the Uruguayan Experience
Previous Article in Journal
Understanding the Roles of Very-Long-Chain Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids (VLC-PUFAs) in Eye Health
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Longitudinal Association between Uric Acid and Incident Sarcopenia

Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2023, 15(14), 3097; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15143097
Submission received: 8 June 2023 / Revised: 3 July 2023 / Accepted: 8 July 2023 / Published: 11 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Geriatric Nutrition)

Abstract

:
Background: Sarcopenia has emerged as a significant public health concern. Uric acid (UA), as a metabolite with excellent antioxidant capacity, has been found to be associated with sarcopenia. However, the casual effects of UA on incident sarcopenia still remain unclear. Our study aimed to explore the longitudinal association between UA and incident sarcopenia among middle-aged and older adults. Method: A total of 5086 participants aged ≥45 years old without sarcopenia at baseline were included from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). Due to the sex differences, the UA levels were analyzed by categorizing into sex-specific quartiles or by using UA levels as a continuous variable (per 1 mg/dL). The longitudinal association between UA and incident sarcopenia was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results: During the 4-year follow-up period, 552 (10.85%) participants with incident sarcopenia were identified, of which 370 cases were males and 182 cases were females. Compared to the first quartile (Q1) UA levels, the Q3 and Q4 UA levels were significantly associated with lower risk of incident sarcopenia in males (Q3: adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 0.72; 95% CI (confidence interval), 0.54–0.97; Q4: HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.41–0.80). When UA was as a continuous variable (per 1 mg/dL), the association in males remained significant (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.79–0.97). No significant association was observed in females. Conclusion: Our findings indicated that UA was negatively associated with incident sarcopenia in males but not in females among middle-aged and older Chinese.

1. Introduction

Sarcopenia is a generalized and progressive disease characterized by the accelerated loss of muscle mass and function, which could increase the risk of various adverse outcomes such as falls, frailty, and even mortality [1]. Sarcopenia is commonly associated with the aging process. However, it is important to acknowledge that lifestyle factors and chronic diseases also contribute significantly to the development and progression of sarcopenia [2,3]. The prevalence of sarcopenia worldwide exhibits considerable variation, ranging from 10% to 27%, due to the diverse diagnostic criteria and targeted population [4]. As the global population continues to age, the burden of sarcopenia is expected to rise substantially. Thus, identifying the modifiable risk factors that contribute to the development and progression of sarcopenia is crucial to prevent or slow down the progression of sarcopenia. Physical inactivity and poor diet have been reported to be risk factors of sarcopenia, but the association between uric acid and sarcopenia remained unclear [1].
Uric acid (UA) is a metabolite produced through the breakdown of purines in the body, which has excellent antioxidant capacity [5]. UA levels have been linked to various diseases including hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and chronic kidney disease in many studies [6,7]. According to previous studies, UA was reported to be positively associated with muscle mass in Brazilian [8] and Chinese [9] participants and positively associated with muscle strength in Japanese [10], Italian [11], and American [12] participants. Conversely, there have also been studies reporting that higher UA levels were associated with lower muscle mass [13] and weaker muscle strength [14]. Most of the studies focused on investigating the effects of UA on muscle mass and strength. Only one cross-sectional study performed in China has specifically explored the association between UA and sarcopenia, revealing that higher UA levels were associated with decreased risk of sarcopenia [15]. Although previous studies have found the association between UA and sarcopenia, the casual effects of UA on incident sarcopenia were still unclear. Therefore, to better understand the effects of UA on sarcopenia, we conducted this study to explore the longitudinal association between UA and incident sarcopenia among the middle-aged and older adults based on the nationally representative data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS).

2. Methods

2.1. Study Population

The study population was derived from the CHARLS, an ongoing nationally representative longitudinal survey of individuals aged 45 years and above in China. The CHARLS employed a multistage probability proportional to size sampling strategy to select households from 450 villages or residential communities in 28 provinces throughout China All recruited participants were interviewed through standardized face-to-face computer-assisted personal interview (CAPI) by well-trained interviewers. The baseline survey was conducted between June 2011 and March 2012, with a total of 17,708 participants being included. The follow-up survey was conducted every two years. A detailed description of the CHARLS design has been reported previously [16].
In this longitudinal study, we used the data from CHARLS 2011 (wave 1), 2013 (wave 2) and 2015 (wave 3). In wave 1, the sample size was 17,708. Participants lacking the information of sarcopenia (n = 4635), aged <45 or missing age information (n = 258), missing sex information (n = 9) and lacking the data of UA (n = 3550) were excluded. A total of 9256 participants had complete information at wave1. We further excluded participants with sarcopenia at baseline (wave 1, n = 1008) and participants missing information in the follow-ups (n = 3162). Finally, 5086 participants were included in the final analysis (Figure 1).
Ethical approval for the CHARLS was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Peking University (approval number: IRB00001052–11015), and written informed consents were obtained from all participants prior to enrollment in this survey [16]. This study was conducted following the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guidelines.

2.2. Diagnose of Sarcopenia

According to the 2019 consensus of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS), sarcopenia diagnosis was assessed upon three parameters: muscle strength, appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM), and physical performance [17]. Participants with low muscle mass plus low muscle strength or low physical performance was diagnosed sarcopenia. Muscle strength was assessed by handgrip strength and the method of handgrip strength measurement has been previously documented [16]. Low muscle strength is defined as an average handgrip strength <28 kg for male and <18 kg for female, as per the aforementioned AWGS 2019. According to the established literature, the appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) in the present study was estimated using a validated formula previously reported in the Chinese population, which has shown good consistency with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in various studies [18,19]. Specifically, the formula for ASM calculation was as follows: ASM = 0.193 × weight (kg) + 0.107 × height (cm) − 4.157 × sex − 0.037 × age (years) − 2.631 [18]. The body weight and height were measured utilizing the OmronTM HN-286 scale and SecaTM213 stadiometer, respectively. The male was encoded as 1 and female as 2. The skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) was computed by dividing ASM by the square of height (ASM/height2). Based on previous studies, the criterion of low muscle mass was set as the sex-specific lowest 20% of SMI in the study population, which corresponded to a value of <6.99 kg/m2 in male and <5.27 kg/m2 in female [19,20]. Physical performance was assessed by gait speed and 5-time chair stand test and low physical performance was defined as the gait speed <1.0 m/s or the 5-time chair stand test ≥12 s [17].

2.3. Uric Acid

All participants were asked to fast overnight and the blood samples of participants were collected by medically-trained staff from Chinese center for disease control and prevention (Chinese CDC), based on a standard protocol. Venous blood was separated into plasma and buffy coat and stored in cryovials. These cryovials were promptly frozen at −20 °C and transported to the Chinese CDC in Beijing within two weeks. Upon arrival, the samples were transferred to a deep freezer and stored at −80 °C until they were assayed at the laboratory of Capital Medical University. UA levels (mg/dL) were quantified using the UA Plus method [16].

2.4. Covariates

The following baseline variables were selected as covariates in this study, including demographic, health behaviors, chronic diseases, and biochemical parameters. The baseline demographic variables included age, sex, residence (rural and urban), highest educational level (primary school or below, middle school and high school or above), and marital status (married and living with spouse and others). Health behaviors included drinking status (yes and no), smoking status (yes and no) and self-reported nighttime sleep duration. Diabetes mellitus (DM) was diagnosed when participants self-reported having DM diagnosed by a physician or the fasting glucose levels ≥7 mmol/L or the random glucose levels ≥11.1 mmol/L or the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥6.5%. Hypertension was defined as self-reported having hypertension diagnosed by a physician or the systolic blood pressure (BP) ≥140 mmHg or the diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg. Depression was assessed by the 10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), and participants with scores ≥12 were considered to have depression. Dyslipidemia was defined as the ratio of cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) of ≥5.0 or self-reported having dyslipidemia diagnosed by a physician. Other chronic diseases such as pulmonary disease, kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, and arthritis were assessed by the physician-diagnosed history. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using creatinine values, age and sex [21].

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The sex differences in UA are well reported in several studies [22,23]. Therefore, all analyses were performed separately for males and females. The association between UA and sarcopenia was analyzed by categorizing UA levels into sex-specific quartiles or by using UA as a continuous variable (per 1 mg/dL). The first quartile of UA level (Q1) was set as the reference group (Male: Q1: ≤4.06 mg/dL, Q2: 4.06–4.80 mg/dL, Q3: 4.80–5.67 mg/dL, Q4: ≥5.67 mg/dL; Female: Q1: ≤3.30 mg/dL, Q2: 3.30–3.88 mg/dL, Q3: 3.88–4.58 mg/dL, Q4: ≥4.58 mg/dL).
The baseline characteristics of including participants were described and compared according to the sex-specific quartiles of UA. Continuous variables and categorical variables were presented as means with standard deviations (SDs) and numbers with percentages, respectively. The characteristic differences between quartiles groups were compared using one-way analysis of variance for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables. To assess the association between UA and sarcopenia in this four-year follow-up study, we employed Cox proportional hazards models to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The proportional hazard assumption in the Cox proportional hazards models was verified using Schoenfeld residuals [24]. The fully multivariable model adjusted for age, residence, educational level, marital status, drinking status, smoking status, nighttime sleep duration, DM, hypertension, depression, dyslipidemia, pulmonary disease, kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, arthritis, eGFR, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP), HDL-c and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c). Subgroup analyses stratified by age (median age), residence, smoking, drinking, hypertension, DM, dyslipidemia, and depression were performed.
Several sensitivity analyses were conducted to exam the robustness of the findings. First, we compared the baseline characteristics of included and excluded participants to explore the potential selection bias. Second, participants with hyperuricemia were excluded. Hyperuricemia was defined as baseline plasma UA > 7.0 mg/dL in males and >6.0 mg/dL in females [25]. Third, participants with eGFR ≤ 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 were excluded.
All statistical analyses in this study were conducted by STATA/MP, version 17.0. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 (two-sided).

3. Results

3.1. Baseline Characteristics Based on the UA Quartiles

A total of 5086 participants were included in this study. Of these, 2359 (46.38%) participants were males and 2727 (53.62%) participants were females. The baseline characteristics of the total sample based on the sex were shown in Table 1. UA levels were significantly higher in males (4.93 ± 1.23) than females (4.00 ± 1.05) at baseline (Table 1). Table 2 showed the baseline characteristics of males according to the quartiles of UA. Compared to males with lower UA levels, males with higher UA were more likely living in urban, to be non-smokers, and more likely having hypertension, depression, dyslipidemia, as well as having higher creatinine, LDL-c, CRP and lower eGFR and HDL-c (Table 2). Males with higher UA levels had higher SMI and better 5-time chair stand test performance. The incidence of sarcopenia increased across UA quartiles in males (Table 2). The baseline characteristics of females based on the quartiles of UA were shown in Table 3. Females with higher UA levels were older, and more likely living in urban, having DM, hypertension, dyslipidemia, arthritis, and higher creatinine, LDL-c, CRP, and lower eGFR and HDL-c. In female participants, those with elevated levels of UA exhibited higher SMI and no statistically significant difference in the incidence of sarcopenia was observed across the quartiles of UA levels.

3.2. Association between UA and Incident Sarcopenia

During the 4 years follow-up, a total of 552 (10.85%) cases with incident sarcopenia were identified, of which 370 cases were males and 182 cases were females. Among males, the incidence rate of sarcopenia was 60.13 per 1000 person-years in Q1 UA group, 44.24 per 1000 person-years in Q2 UA group, 38.18 per 1000 person-years in Q3 UA group and 28.27 per 1000 person-years in Q4 UA group. Table 4 presented the HRs and 95% CIs for incident sarcopenia based on the sex-specific quartiles of UA and continuous variable UA (per 1 mg/dL). In males, model 1, which adjusted for age, residence, educational level and marital status demonstrated that the HRs and 95% CI for incident of sarcopenia in the Q2, Q3 and Q4 groups of UA compared to the Q1 group were 0.73 (0.56–0.95), 0.62 (0.47–0.82), 0.44 (0.32–0.60), respectively. The association did not significantly change after further adjusting for smoking, drinking, and nighttime sleep duration (model 2). Additionally, after further adjusting for DM, hypertension, depression, dyslipidemia, pulmonary disease, kidney disease, cardiovascular disease and arthritis (model 3) and further adjusting for eGFR, CRP, HDL-c and LDL-c based on the model 3 (model 4), males with Q3 and Q4 groups of UA were significantly associated with decreased risk of incident sarcopenia [model 3, Q3: 0.73 (0.55–0.97), Q4: 0.56 (0.41–0.76); model 4, Q3: 0.72 (0.54–0.97), Q4: 0.57 (0.41–0.80)]. When the UA was as a continuous variable (per 1 mg/dL), UA levels was negatively associated with the risk of incident sarcopenia in males. The HR and 95% CI in model 4 was 0.87 (0.79–0.97) (Figure 2A) (Table 4).
In females, the incidence rate of sarcopenia in Q1–Q4 groups were 17.26, 18.46, 16.48 and 16.21 per 1000 person-years, respectively. There was no significant longitudinal association between UA and incident sarcopenia in females according to the quartiles of UA or as a continuous variable (per 1 mg/dL) (Figure 2B) (Table 4). Subgroup analyses stratified by median age, residence, smoking, drinking, hypertension, DM, dyslipidemia, and depression were conducted based on separate analyses of sex (Table 5). The association between UA as a continuous variable and incident sarcopenia was assessed in the subgroup analyses.
According to the subgroup analyses, males who were younger (≤58 years old), living in rural, smokers, non-drinkers, and without hypertension, DM, dyslipidemia, as well as with depression were more responsive to the protective effects of UA against the incident of sarcopenia (Table 5). In females, there was no significant effect modification observed in subgroups analyses.

3.3. Sensitivity Analysis

We compared the baseline characteristic between included and excluded participants and the difference was not significant (Table S1). After excluding participants with hyperuricemia and eGFR ≤60 mL/min per 1.73 m2, we reanalyzed the data and found that the association between UA and sarcopenia did not change significantly (Tables S2 and S3).

4. Discussion

We conducted a longitudinal study using nationally representative data to assess the association between UA and incident sarcopenia, diagnosed using AWGS 2019 algorithm, in middle-aged and older Chinese population. When the UA was analyzed by sex-specific quartiles, the Q3 and Q4 groups in males were significantly associated with decreased risk of incident sarcopenia. This negative association remained significant when considering UA as a continuous variable in males. In our analysis of females, we did not find a significant association between UA and sarcopenia.
Our findings indicated a significant negative association between UA and incident sarcopenia in males but not in females. The potential protective effect of UA against sarcopenia are in line with previous studies. A cross-sectional study demonstrated that UA levels were positively associated with muscle mass and muscle strength in kidney transplant patients [8]. Another population-based study revealed that UA was positively associated with peak muscle strength [12]. In addition, a prospective study with 3-year follow-up reported that higher UA levels were associated with higher follow-up muscle strength after adjusting for potential confounders [26]. However, the sex difference of our findings showed inconsistences with previous studies. UA was found to be positively associated with muscle strength in older men and women in a cross-sectional study [12]. Another cross-sectional study conducted in West China reported that evaluated UA levels were negatively associated with sarcopenia in both males and females [15]. The results disparity may be attributed that participants in the study were all from four provinces in China (Yunnan, Guizhou, Sichuan, and Xinjiang), and that most of them were middle-aged ranging from 50 to 60 years old [15]. Nevertheless, there was also a retrospective cohort study supporting our findings [27]. This study revealed that the UA was positively associated with relative ASM in patients with peritoneal dialysis and this association only existed in males [27]. However, the study population was limited to peritoneal dialysis patients, and further studies involving the general population are needed. Compared with previous cross-sectional studies, our findings provided new evidence regarding the casual effects of UA on incident sarcopenia.
The negative association between UA and incident sarcopenia may be related with the excellent antioxidant capacity of UA. It has been well established that oxidative stress was an essential pathogenetic process in age-related sarcopenia, which was accompanied by the overproduction of reactive oxygen species [1,28]. UA may protect the muscle health through scavenging reactive oxygen species and reducing oxidative damage [29]. Moreover, UA is mainly derived from the metabolism of purine-rich foods, such as meats and seafood, which are rich in protein. Higher UA levels may reflect better nutritional status, which may partially explain the association between UA and sarcopenia [30]. The exact mechanisms of the effects of UA on sarcopenia were still unclear, and further studies are needed to explore its underlying mechanisms.
For the sex difference of the association between UA and incident sarcopenia in our study, it may be related with the hormonal influence. Most females included in this study were menopausal, which resulted in a decrease of estrogen. Estrogen has been reported to promote the excretion of UA, which may result in elevated UA levels in menopausal females [31]. In addition, the decrease of estrogen could increase pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor alpha or interleukine-6, which contributes to muscle catabolism [32,33]. Alterations in estrogen levels before and after menopause may partially attenuate the significant association between UA and incident sarcopenia in females. Moreover, the decrease of age-related muscle mass was more apparent in males, which may contribute to a more discernible protective effect of UA in males [34].
The strength of this study was based on a large and nationally representative sample, which allows for the extension of the findings to the middle-aged and older population in China. To our knowledge, this is the first study to explore the longitudinal association between UA and incident sarcopenia, assessed using the AWGS 2019 algorithm. However, there are also several limitations should be noted. First, although the formula has been previously validated in Chinese population and showed good consistency with DXA in various studies, the muscle mass was estimated by a formula, not by DXA or bioelectrical impedance analysis [18]. Second, in this study, UA was measured only once time. Although the assays were all preformed at Capital Medical University laboratory which had the same quality control, the impact of dynamic changes in UA levels on sarcopenia was unknown [16]. Third, we have adjusted multiple confounders, but other unmeasured confounders were not included, such as nutritional status and dietary intake. Finally, participants in this study were all from China and therefore the generalizability of our findings to other population groups may be limited.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our findings indicated that UA was negatively associated with incident sarcopenia in males but not in females in middle-aged and older Chinese. The findings supported the association between UA and sarcopenia, and suggested the gender difference existed in the effects of UA on sarcopenia.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu15143097/s1, Table S1. Baseline characteristics of included and excluded participants in this study; Table S2. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for incident sarcopenia according to the sex-specific quartiles of uric acid and uric acid as a continuous variable after excluding participants with hyperuricemia. Table S3. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for incident sarcopenia according to the sex-specific quartiles of uric acid and uric acid as a continuous variable after excluding participants with eGFR ≤60 mL/min per 1.73 m2.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.S.; Data curation, L.W.; Formal analysis, S.Z. and H.S.; Funding acquisition, B.S.; Methodology, S.Z., L.W. and H.S.; Supervision, H.S.; Writing—original draft, S.Z.; Writing—review & editing, B.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Program No.82272561 and No. 81974347), the Foundation of the Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province (Program No.2022YFS0050).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical approval for the CHARLS was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Peking University (approval number: IRB00001052–11,015).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets of our study are from the CHARLS website: http://charls.pku.edu.cn/en (accessed on 8 June 2023).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cruz-Jentoft, A.J.; Sayer, A.A. Sarcopenia. Lancet 2019, 393, 2636–2646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yuan, S.; Larsson, S.C. Epidemiology of sarcopenia: Prevalence, risk factors, and consequences. Metab. Clin. Exp. 2023, 144, 155533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sayer, A.A.; Cruz-Jentoft, A. Sarcopenia definition, diagnosis and treatment: Consensus is growing. Age Ageing 2022, 51, afac220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Petermann-Rocha, F.; Balntzi, V.; Gray, S.R.; Lara, J.; Ho, F.K.; Pell, J.P.; Celis-Morales, C. Global prevalence of sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Cachex-Sarcopenia Muscle 2021, 13, 86–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Crawley, W.T.; Jungels, C.G.; Stenmark, K.R.; Fini, M.A. U-shaped association of uric acid to overall-cause mortality and its impact on clinical management of hyperuricemia. Redox Biol. 2022, 51, 102271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Borghi, C.; Agnoletti, D.; Cicero, A.F.G.; Lurbe, E.; Virdis, A. Uric Acid and Hypertension: A Review of Evidence and Future Perspectives for the Management of Cardiovascular Risk. Hypertension 2022, 79, 1927–1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ramos, G.K.; Goldfarb, D.S. Update on Uric Acid and the Kidney. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 2022, 24, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Floriano, J.P.; Nahas, P.C.; de Branco, F.M.S.; dos Reis, A.S.; Rossato, L.T.; Santos, H.O.; Limirio, L.S.; Ferreira-Filho, S.R.; de Oliveira, E.P. Serum Uric Acid Is Positively Associated with Muscle Mass and Strength, but Not with Functional Capacity, in Kidney Transplant Patients. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xu, Z.-R.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, L.-F.; Xu, K.-Y.; Xia, J.-Y.; Li, S.-M.; Yang, Y.-M. Characteristics of hyperuricemia in older adults in China and possible associations with sarcopenia. Aging Med. 2018, 1, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kawamoto, R.; Ninomiya, D.; Kasai, Y.; Kusunoki, T.; Ohtsuka, N.; Kumagi, T.; Abe, M. Serum Uric Acid Is Positively Associated with Handgrip Strength among Japanese Community-Dwelling Elderly Women. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0151044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Molino-Lova, R.; Sofi, F.; Pasquini, G.; Vannetti, F.; Del Ry, S.; Vassalle, C.; Clerici, M.; Sorbi, S.; Macchi, C. Higher uric acid serum levels are associated with better muscle function in the oldest old: Results from the Mugello Study. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2017, 41, 39–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nahas, P.C.; Rossato, L.T.; de Branco, F.M.; Azeredo, C.M.; Rinaldi, A.E.M.; de Oliveira, E.P. Serum uric acid is positively associated with muscle strength in older men and women: Findings from NHANES 1999–2002. Clin. Nutr. 2021, 40, 4386–4393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Beavers, K.M.; Beavers, D.P.; Serra, M.C.; Bowden, R.G.; Wilson, R.L. Low relative skeletal muscle mass indicative of sarcopenia is associated with elevations in serum uric acid levels: Findings from NHANES III. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2009, 13, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Huang, C.; Niu, K.; Kobayashi, Y.; Guan, L.; Momma, H.; Cui, Y.; Chujo, M.; Otomo, A.; Guo, H.; Tadaura, H.; et al. An inverted J-shaped association of serum uric acid with muscle strength among Japanese adult men: A cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2013, 14, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Liu, X.; Chen, X.; Hu, F.; Xia, X.; Hou, L.; Zhang, G.; Peng, X.; Sun, X.; Luo, S.; Yue, J.; et al. Higher uric acid serum levels are associated with sarcopenia in west China: A cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr. 2022, 22, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhao, Y.; Hu, Y.; Smith, J.P.; Strauss, J.; Yang, G. Cohort Profile: The China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). Int. J. Epidemiol. 2014, 43, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Chen, L.-K.; Woo, J.; Assantachai, P.; Auyeung, T.-W.; Chou, M.-Y.; Iijima, K.; Jang, H.C.; Kang, L.; Kim, M.; Kim, S.; et al. Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 Consensus Update on Sarcopenia Diagnosis and Treatment. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2020, 21, 300–307.e302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wen, X.; Wang, M.; Jiang, C.-M.; Zhang, Y.-M. Anthropometric equation for estimation of appendicular skeletal muscle mass in Chinese adults. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 20, 551–556. [Google Scholar]
  19. Yang, M.; Hu, X.; Wang, H.; Zhang, L.; Hao, Q.; Dong, B. Sarcopenia predicts readmission and mortality in elderly patients in acute care wards: A prospective study. J. Cachex-Sarcopenia Muscle 2016, 8, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Newman, A.B.; Kupelian, V.; Visser, M.; Simonsick, E.; Goodpaster, B.; Nevitt, M.; Kritchevsky, S.B.; Tylavsky, F.A.; Rubin, S.M.; Harris, T.B.; et al. Sarcopenia: Alternative Definitions and Associations with Lower Extremity Function. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2003, 51, 1602–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Zhang, L.; Wang, F.; Wang, L.; Wang, W.; Liu, B.; Liu, J.; Chen, M.; He, Q.; Liao, Y.; Yu, X.; et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in China: A cross-sectional survey. Lancet 2012, 379, 815–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chen, J.-H.; Yeh, W.-T.; Chuang, S.-Y.; Wu, Y.-Y.; Pan, W.-H. Gender-specific risk factors for incident gout: A prospective cohort study. Clin. Rheumatol. 2011, 31, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Cho, S.K.; Chang, Y.; Kim, I.; Ryu, S. U-Shaped Association Between Serum Uric Acid Level and Risk of Mortality: A Cohort Study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018, 70, 1122–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Schoenfeld, D. Partial residuals for the proportional hazards regression model. Biometrika 1982, 69, 239–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, W.; Doherty, M.; Bardin, T.; Pascual, E.; Barskova, V.; Conaghan, P.; Gerster, J.; Jacobs, J.; Leeb, B.; Lioté, F.; et al. EULAR evidence based recommendations for gout. Part II: Management. Report of a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee For International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2006, 65, 1312–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Macchi, C.; Molino-Lova, R.; Polcaro, P.; Guarducci, L.; Lauretani, F.; Cecchi, F.; Bandinelli, S.; Guralnik, J.M.; Ferrucci, L. Higher circulating levels of uric acid are prospectively associated with better muscle function in older persons. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2008, 129, 522–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xiao, X.; Yi, C.; Peng, Y.; Ye, H.; Wu, H.; Wu, M.; Huang, X.; Yu, X.; Yang, X. The Association between Serum Uric Acid and Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass and the Effect of Their Interaction on Mortality in Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis. Kidney Blood Press. Res. 2020, 45, 969–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Meng, S.-J.; Yu, L.-J. Oxidative Stress, Molecular Inflammation and Sarcopenia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010, 11, 1509–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Ahn, S.H.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, B.J.; Lim, K.H.; Bae, S.J.; Kim, E.H.; Kim, H.K.; Choe, J.W.; Koh, J.M.; Kim, G.S. Higher serum uric acid is associated with higher bone mass, lower bone turnover, and lower prevalence of vertebral fracture in healthy postmenopausal women. Osteoporos. Int. J. Establ. Result Coop. Between Eur. Found. Osteoporos. Natl. Osteoporos. Found. USA 2013, 24, 2961–2970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Park, C.; Obi, Y.; Streja, E.; Rhee, C.M.; Catabay, C.J.; Vaziri, N.D.; Kovesdy, C.P.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K. Serum uric acid, protein intake and mortality in hemodialysis patients. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. Off. Publ. Eur. Dial. Transpl. Assoc.-Eur. Ren. Assoc. 2017, 32, 1750–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Płaczkowska, S.; Pawlik-Sobecka, L.; Kokot, I.; Piwowar, A. The association between serum uric acid and features of metabolic disturbances in young adults. Arch. Med. Sci. 2021, 17, 1277–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, S.; Ma, L.; Huang, H.M.; Lou, Z.M.; Qi, T.; Huang, Y.; Zou, Y.; Zhou, J. Loss of muscle mass in women with premature ovarian insufficiency as compared with healthy controls. Menopause 2022, 30, 122–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Messier, V.; Rabasa-Lhoret, R.; Barbat-Artigas, S.; Elisha, B.; Karelis, A.D.; Aubertin-Leheudre, M. Menopause and sarcopenia: A potential role for sex hormones. Maturitas 2011, 68, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Oh, S.-L.; Yoon, S.H.; Lim, J.-Y. Age- and sex-related differences in myosin heavy chain isoforms and muscle strength, function, and quality: A cross sectional study. J. Exerc. Nutr. Biochem. 2018, 22, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flowchart of study participants selection.
Figure 1. Flowchart of study participants selection.
Nutrients 15 03097 g001
Figure 2. (A) HRs and 95% CIs for incident sarcopenia according to the sex-specific quartiles of uric acid and uric acid as a continuous variable in males. (B) HRs and 95% CIs for incident sarcopenia according to the sex-specific quartiles of uric acid and uric acid as a continuous variable in females. In males: Q1: ≤4.06 mg/dL; Q2: 4.06–4.80 mg/dL; Q3: 4.81–5.67 mg/dL; Q4: ≥5.67 mg/dL. In females: Q1: ≤3.30 mg/dL; Q2: 3.30–3.88 mg/dL; Q3: 3.88–4.58 mg/dL; Q4: ≥4.58 mg/dL. Adjusted for age, residence, educational level, marital status, drinking status, smoking status, nighttime sleep duration, DM, hypertension, depression, dyslipidemia, pulmonary disease, kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, arthritis, eGFR, CRP, HDL-c and LDL-c. Abbreviations: HRs, hazards ratios; CIs, confidence intervals; UA, uric acid; DM, diabetes mellitus; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL-c, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; CRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein.
Figure 2. (A) HRs and 95% CIs for incident sarcopenia according to the sex-specific quartiles of uric acid and uric acid as a continuous variable in males. (B) HRs and 95% CIs for incident sarcopenia according to the sex-specific quartiles of uric acid and uric acid as a continuous variable in females. In males: Q1: ≤4.06 mg/dL; Q2: 4.06–4.80 mg/dL; Q3: 4.81–5.67 mg/dL; Q4: ≥5.67 mg/dL. In females: Q1: ≤3.30 mg/dL; Q2: 3.30–3.88 mg/dL; Q3: 3.88–4.58 mg/dL; Q4: ≥4.58 mg/dL. Adjusted for age, residence, educational level, marital status, drinking status, smoking status, nighttime sleep duration, DM, hypertension, depression, dyslipidemia, pulmonary disease, kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, arthritis, eGFR, CRP, HDL-c and LDL-c. Abbreviations: HRs, hazards ratios; CIs, confidence intervals; UA, uric acid; DM, diabetes mellitus; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL-c, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; CRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein.
Nutrients 15 03097 g002
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of participants in this study according to sex.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of participants in this study according to sex.
TotalMaleFemalep-Value
n508623592727
Uric acid, mg/dL4.43 ± 1.234.93 ± 1.234.00 ± 1.05<0.001
Demographic
Age, years58.36 ± 8.3459.53 ± 8.3757.34 ± 8.19<0.001
Residence 0.12
Urban842 (16.61)370 (15.74)472 (17.37)
Rural4227 (83.39)1981 (84.26)2246 (82.63)
Education level <0.001
Primary school or below3534 (69.48)1395 (59.14)2139 (78.44)
Middle school1059 (20.82)640 (27.13)419 (15.36)
High school or above493 (9.69)324 (13.73)169 (6.20)
Marital status <0.001
Married and living with spouse4407 (86.65)2117 (89.74)2290 (83.98)
Others679 (13.35)242 (10.26)437 (16.02)
Health behavior
Drinking <0.001
Yes1663 (32.74)1333 (56.58)330 (12.11)
No3417 (67.26)1023 (43.42)2394 (87.89)
Smoking <0.001
Yes1516 (29.88)1366 (58.08)150 (5.51)
No3557 (70.12)986 (41.92)2571 (94.49)
Sleep duration, h6.37 ± 1.826.44 ± 1.756.31 ± 1.870.011
Chronic diseases
Diabetes Mellitus750 (14.75)320 (13.57)430 (15.77)0.027
Hypertension2049 (40.29)920 (39.00)1129 (41.40)0.082
Depression1623 (31.91)605 (25.65)1018 (37.33)<0.001
Dyslipidemia1406 (27.64)620 (26.28)786 (28.82)0.043
Pulmonary disease493 (9.74)278 (11.86)215 (7.91)<0.001
Kidney disease349 (6.91)188 (8.04)161 (5.94)0.003
Cardiovascular disease586 (11.59)241 (10.28)345 (12.73)0.007
Arthritis1788 (35.24)731 (31.08)1057 (38.83)<0.001
Biochemical parameters
Creatinine, mg/dL0.77 ± 0.180.87 ± 0.180.69 ± 0.13<0.001
eGFR, mL/(min × 1.73 m2)108.37 ± 28.73104.98 ± 26.70111.30 ± 30.07<0.001
HDL-c, mg/dL50.64 ± 15.0750.24 ± 16.0951.00 ± 14.120.073
LDL-c, mg/dL117.19 ± 34.80112.61 ± 33.68121.16 ± 35.26<0.001
CRP, mg/L2.43 ± 6.602.64 ± 7.472.25 ± 5.740.033
Sarcopenia
Handgrip strength, kg33.53 ± 10.1540.07 ± 8.6127.88 ± 7.69<0.001
SMI, kg/m26.86 ± 1.147.69 ± 0.926.14 ± 0.78<0.001
Gait speed, m/s1.50 ± 4.511.56 ± 4.391.43 ± 4.630.509
5-time chair stand test, s10.43 ± 3.839.92 ± 3.68710.88 ± 3.90<0.001
Sarcopenia552 (10.85)370 (15.68)182 (6.67)<0.001
Continuous variables are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, and categorical variables are expressed as numbers (percentages). Abbreviations: eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL-c, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; CRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein; SMI, skeletal muscle mass index.
Table 2. Baseline characteristics of males in this study according to quartiles of uric acid.
Table 2. Baseline characteristics of males in this study according to quartiles of uric acid.
TotalQ1
(≤4.06 mg/dL)
Q2
(4.06–4.80 mg/dL)
Q3
(4.81–5.67 mg/dL)
Q4
(≥5.67 mg/dL)
p-Value
n2359587589592591
Uric acid, mg/dL4.93 ± 1.233.51 ± 0.454.44 ± 0.22 *5.21 ± 0.25 * #6.58 ± 0.81 * # &<0.001
Demographic
Age, years59.53 ± 8.3759.17 ± 7.9159.27 ± 8.2959.59 ± 8.5660.08 ± 8.700.236
Residence <0.001
Urban370 (15.74)68 (11.62)75 (12.78)105 (17.77) * #122 (20.75) * #
Rural1981 (84.26)517 (88.38)512 (87.22)486 (82.23)466 (79.25)
Education level 0.898
Primary school or below1395 (59.14)345 (59.25)349 (59.25)346 (58.45)355 (59.14)
Middle school640 (27.13)163 (27.77)166 (28.18)161 (27.20)150 (25.38)
High school or above324 (13.73)79 (13.46)74 (12.56)85 (14.36)86 (14.55)
Marital status 0.175
Married and living with spouse2117 (89.74)519 (88.42)524 (89.96)530 (89.53)544 (92.05)
Others242 (10.26)68 (11.58)65 (11.04)62 (10.47)47(7.95)
BMI, kg/m223.56 ± 10.3322.58 ± 3.6623.15 ± 3.2124.41 ± 19.66 *24.09 ± 3.690.008
Health behavior
Drinking 0.149
Yes1333 (56.58)318 (54.27)322 (54.67)338 (57.19)355 (60.17)
No1023 (43.42)268 (45.73)267 (45.33)253 (42.81)235 (39.83)
Smoking 0.017
Yes1366 (58.08)359 (61.37)361 (61.29)323 (54.84) * #323 (54.84) * #
No986 (41.92)226 (38.63)228 (38.71)266 (45.16)266 (45.16)
Sleep duration, h6.44 ± 1.756.48 ± 1.696.42 ± 1.706.38 ± 1.806.48 ± 1.810.686
Chronic diseases
Diabetes Mellitus320 (13.57)85 (14.48)73 (12.39)72 (12.16)90 (15.23)0.321
Hypertension920 (39.00)174 (29.64)207 (35.14) *247 (41.72) * #292 (49.41) * # &<0.001
Depression605 (25.65)193 (32.88)151 (25.64) *143 (24.16) *118 (19.97) * # &<0.001
Dyslipidemia620 (26.28)106(18.06)143(24.28) *162(27.36) *209(35.36) * # &<0.001
Pulmonary disease278 (11.86)77 (13.18)63 (10.71)70 (11.63)68 (11.60)0.624
Kidney disease188 (8.04)48 (8.26)42 (7.18)52 (8.86)46 (7.85)0.756
Cardiovascular disease241 (10.28)51 (8.75)64 (10.88)69 (11.75)57 (9.73)0.348
Arthritis731 (31.08)188 (30.27)178 (30.27)187 (31.69)178 (30.27)0.864
Biochemical parameters
Creatinine, mg/dL0.87 ± 0.180.78 ± 0.140.84 ± 0.15 *0.89 ± 0.16 * #0.97 ± 0.19 * # &<0.001
eGFR, mL/(min × 1.73 m2)104.9 ± 26.70119.06 ± 27.67108.69 ± 24.52100.91 ± 22.93 * #91.31 ± 23.39 * # &<0.001
HDL-c, mg/dL50.24 ± 16.0951.02 ± 14.3951.42 ± 16.8950.58 ± 16.98 *47.93 ± 15.98 * # &<0.001
LDL-c, mg/dL112.61 ± 33.68108.19 ± 29.99113.25 ± 32.19114.11 ± 32.89 *114.87 ± 38.71 *0.002
CRP, mg/L2.64 ± 7.472.68 ± 6.412.50 ± 8.652.31 ± 5.003.09 ± 9.080.313
Sarcopenia
Handgrip strength, kg40.07 ± 8.6139.27 ± 8.7640.04 ± 8.8540.61 ± 8.6640.33 ± 8.120.047
SMI, kg/m27.69 ± 0.927.53 ± 0.727.64 ± 0.647.77 ± 1.36 *7.81 ± 0.74 * #<0.001
Gait speed, m/s1.56 ± 4.391.42 ± 0.431.65 ± 4.621.35 ± 0.451.80 ± 7.270.602
5-time chair stand test, s9.92 ± 3.6810.18 ± 3.489.92 ± 3.739.99 ± 4.039.57 ± 3.42 *0.039
Sarcopenia370 (15.68)127 (21.64)96 (16.30) *84 (14.19) *63 (10.66) * #<0.001
Continuous variables are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, and categorical variables are expressed as numbers (percentages). Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL-c, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; CRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein; SMI, skeletal muscle mass index. Significant at * p < 0.05 compared to Q1 group, # p < 0.05 compared to Q2 group, & p < 0.05 compared to Q3 group.
Table 3. Baseline characteristics of females in this study according to quartiles of uric acid.
Table 3. Baseline characteristics of females in this study according to quartiles of uric acid.
TotalQ1
(≤3.30 mg/dL)
Q2
(3.30–3.88 mg/dL)
Q3
(3.88–4.58 mg/dL)
Q4
(≥4.58 mg/dL)
p-Value
n2727681682682682
Uric acid, mg/dL4.00 ± 1.052.81 ± 0.363.59 ± 0.16 *4.20 ± 0.19 * #5.41 ± 0.79 * # &<0.001
Demographic
Age, years57.34 ± 8.1955.68 ± 7.4957.01 ± 8.02 *57.33 ± 8.10 *59.36 ± 8.68 * # &<0.001
Residence <0.001
Urban472 (17.37)83 (12.21)97 (14.26)134 (19.71) * #158 (23.30) * #
Rural2246 (82.63)597 (87.79)583 (85.74)546 (80.29)520(76.70)
Education level 0.5
Primary school or below2139 (78.44)529 (77.68)535 (78.45)539 (79.03)536 (78.59)
Middle school419 (15.36)115 (16.89)95(13.93)105 (15.40)104 (15.25)
High school or above169 (6.20)37 (5.43)52 (7.62)38 (5.57)42 (6.16)
Marital status 0.098
Married and living with spouse2290 (86.20)587 (86.20)578 (84.75)570 (83.58)555 (81.38)
Others437 (16.02)94 (13.80)104 (15.25)112 (16.42)127 (18.62)
BMI, kg/m224.75 ± 9.524.59 ± 17.7424.28 ± 3.8924.63 ± 3.7625.49 ± 4.070.104
Health behavior
Drinking 0.294
Yes330 (12.11)72 (10.57)81 (11.88)82 (12.06)95 (13.95)
No2394 (87.89)609 (89.43)601 (88.12)598 (87.94)586 (86.05)
Smoking 0.505
Yes150 (5.51)33 (4.85)41 (6.01)33 (4.86)43 (6.33)
No2571 (94.49)648 (95.15)641 (93.99)646 (95.14)636 (93.67)
Sleep duration, h6.31 ± 1.876.34 ± 1.906.29 ± 1.916.30 ± 1.836.31 ± 1.850.966
Chronic diseases
Diabetes Mellitus430 (15.77)105 (15.42)94 (13.78)95 (13.93)136 (19.94) * # &0.005
Hypertension1129 (41.40)226 (33.19)269 (39.44) *276 (40.47) *358 (52.49) * # &<0.001
Depression1018 (37.33)263 (38.62)256 (37.54)251 (36.80)248 (36.36)0.838
Dyslipidemia786 (28.82)141 (20.70)162 (23.75) *207 (30.35) * #276 (40.47) * # &<0.001
Pulmonary disease215 (7.91)49 (7.23)49 (7.18)58 (8.55)59 (8.69)0.598
Kidney disease161 (5.94)41 (6.07)42 (6.17)37 (5.47)41 (6.06)0.946
Cardiovascular disease345 (12.73)77 (11.36)103 (15.17)78 (11.50)87 (12.87)0.126
Arthritis1057 (38.83)233 (34.21)260 (38.24)268 (39.41) *296 (43.47) *0.006
Biochemical parameters
Creatinine, mg/dL0.69 ± 0.130.62 ± 0.100.67 ± 0.11 *0.70 ± 0.11 * #0.77 ± 0.15 * # &<0.001
eGFR, mL/(min × 1.73 m2)111.30 ± 30.07125.99 ± 31.45114.37 ± 26.04 *108.55 ± 28.32 * #96.29 ± 26.31 * # &<0.001
HDL-c, mg/dL51.00 ± 14.1252.74 ± 14.1352.44 ± 14.3450.37 ± 13.65 * #48.43 ± 13.96 * # &<0.001
LDL-c, mg/dL121.16 ± 35.26117.02 ± 33.09118.66 ± 32.22122.98 ± 35.82 * #126.01 ± 38.92 * #<0.001
CRP, mg/L2.25 ± 5.741.83 ± 5.522.18 ± 6.70 *2.11 ± 4.39 * #2.88 ± 6.04 * # &0.006
Sarcopenia
Handgrip strength, kg27.88 ± 7.6927.94 ± 7.0827.91 ± 8.4427.71 ± 8.1627.97 ± 7.690.922
SMI, kg/m26.14 ± 0.786.07 ± 0.816.07 ± 0.726.15 ± 0.746.28 ± 0.82 * #<0.001
Gait speed, m/s1.43 ± 4.631.34 ± 0.671.32 ± 0.381.26 ± 0.401.71 ± 8.370.644
5-time chair stand test, s10.87 ± 3.9010.75 ± 3.3410.80 ± 3.5810.94 ± 3.9711.00 ± 4.600.624
Sarcopenia182 (6.67)46 (6.75)49 (7.18)44 (6.45)43 (6.30)0.92
Continuous variables are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, and categorical variables are expressed as numbers (percentages). Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL-c, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; CRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein; SMI, skeletal muscle mass index. Significant at * p < 0.05 compared to Q1 group, # p < 0.05 compared to Q2 group, & p < 0.05 compared to Q3 group.
Table 4. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for incident sarcopenia according to the sex-specific quartiles of uric acid and uric acid as a continuous variable.
Table 4. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for incident sarcopenia according to the sex-specific quartiles of uric acid and uric acid as a continuous variable.
OutcomeCasesIncidence Rate,
per 1000 Person-Years
Model 1p-ValueModel 2p-ValueModel 3p-ValueModel 4 p-Value
Males
Continuous variable
(UA per 1 mg/dL)
37042.470.81 (0.74–0.88)<0.0010.81 (0.74–0.89)<0.0010.86 (0.79–0.95)0.0020.87 (0.79–0.97)0.011
UA quartiles
Q1 (≤4.06 mg/dL)12760.131 1 1 1
Q2 (4.06–4.80 mg/dL)9644.240.73 (0.56–0.95)0.0230.71 (0.55–0.93)0.0150.81 (0.62–1.06)0.1270.80 (0.61–1.06)0.124
Q3 (4.81–5.67 mg/dL)8438.180.62 (0.47–0.82)0.0010.64 (0.48–0.84)0.0020.73 (0.55–0.97)0.0290.72 (0.54–0.97)0.036
Q4 (≥5.67 mg/dL)6328.270.44 (0.32–0.60)<0.0010.45 (0.33–0.61)<0.0010.56 (0.41–0.76)<0.0010.57 (0.41–0.80)0.001
Females
Continuous variable
(UA per 1 mg/dL)
18217.110.88 (0.76–1.01)0.0910.88 (0.75–1.02)0.0890.92 (0.79–1.07)0.3081.02 (0.87–1.21)0.74
UA quartiles 1 1
Q1 (≤3.30 mg/dL)4617.261 1
Q2 (3.30–3.88 mg/dL)4918.460.96 (0.64–1.43)0.8510.90 (0.60–1.36)0.6410.91 (0.60–1.38)0.6761.02 (0.67–1.56)0.911
Q3 (3.88–4.58 mg/dL)4416.480.84 (0.55–1.27)0.4230.81 (0.53–1.24)0.340.82 (0.53–1.26)0.3690.99 (0.63–1.55)0.983
Q4 (≥4.58 mg/dL)4316.210.72 (0.47–1.10)0.130.72 (0.47–1.11)0.1390.81 (0.52–1.26)0.3551.06 (0.66–1.71)0.796
Data are presented as HRs (95%CIs). Model 1: adjusted age, residence, educational level, marital status. Model 2: further adjusted drinking status, smoking status, nighttime sleep duration based on model 1. Model 3: further adjusted DM, hypertension, depression, dyslipidemia, pulmonary disease, kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, arthritis based on model 2. Model 4: further adjusted eGFR, CRP, HDL-c and LDL-c based on model 3. Abbreviations: HRs, hazards ratios; CIs, confidence intervals; UA, uric acid; DM, diabetes mellitus; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; CRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein.
Table 5. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for incident sarcopenia in subgroup analyses.
Table 5. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for incident sarcopenia in subgroup analyses.
HRs (95%CIs) a
MalesFemales
Age
≤58 years old0.73 (0.58–0.92)1.14 (0.82–1.59)
>580.92 (0.82–1.03)1.05 (0.87–1.26)
Residence
Urban1.03 (0.73–1.47)1.54 (0.93–2.55)
Rural0.86 (0.77–0.95)1.00 (0.84–1.20)
Smoking
Yes0.88 (0.77–0.99)1.10 (0.70–1.73)
No0.88 (0.73–1.06)1.00 (0.84–1.20)
Drinking
Yes0.90 (0.77–1.05)0.88 (0.55–1.41)
No0.85 (0.74–0.98)1.03 (0.86–1.23)
Hypertension
Yes0.93 (0.77–1.12)1.05 (0.82–1.34)
No0.80 (0.76–0.97)1.02 (0.81–1.28)
Diabetes Mellitus
Yes1.36 (0.92–2.01)1.08 (0.68–1.71)
No0.85 (0.76–0.94)1.03 (0.87–1.23)
Dyslipidemia
Yes0.96 (0.68–1.36)0.72 (0.49–1.05)
No0.87 (0.79–0.97)1.16 (0.97–1.39)
Depression
Yes0.78 (0.64–0.94)1.08 (0.85–1.36)
No0.91 (0.80–1.03)0.98 (0.77–1.24)
Data are presented as HRs (95%CIs). a Adjusted for age, residence, educational level, marital status, drinking status, smoking status, nighttime sleep duration, DM, hypertension, depression, dyslipidemia, pulmonary disease, kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, arthritis, eGFR, CRP, HDL-c and LDL-c. Abbreviations: HRs, hazards ratios; CIs, confidence intervals; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL-c, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; CRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhou, S.; Wu, L.; Si, H.; Shen, B. Longitudinal Association between Uric Acid and Incident Sarcopenia. Nutrients 2023, 15, 3097. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15143097

AMA Style

Zhou S, Wu L, Si H, Shen B. Longitudinal Association between Uric Acid and Incident Sarcopenia. Nutrients. 2023; 15(14):3097. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15143097

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhou, Shengliang, Limin Wu, Haibo Si, and Bin Shen. 2023. "Longitudinal Association between Uric Acid and Incident Sarcopenia" Nutrients 15, no. 14: 3097. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15143097

APA Style

Zhou, S., Wu, L., Si, H., & Shen, B. (2023). Longitudinal Association between Uric Acid and Incident Sarcopenia. Nutrients, 15(14), 3097. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15143097

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop