Next Article in Journal
Precision Nutrition Opportunities to Help Mitigate Nutrition and Health Challenges in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: An Expert Opinion Survey
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Continuous Carbohydrate Intake with Gummies during the Golf Round on Interstitial Glucose, Golf Performance, and Cognitive Performance of Competitive Golfers: A Randomized Repeated-Measures Crossover Design
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High Prevalence of Energy and Nutrients Inadequacy among Brazilian Older Adults

by
Natalia Vieira Magalhães
1,
Dan Linetzky Waitzberg
1,
Natalia Correia Lopes
1,
Ana Carolina Costa Vicedomini
1,
Ana Paula Aguiar Prudêncio
1,
Wilson Jacob-Filho
2,
Alexandre Leopold Busse
2,
Douglas Ferdinando
2,
Tatiana Pereira Alves
2,
Rosa Maria Rodrigues Pereira
3,
Raquel Susana Torrinhas
1 and
Giliane Belarmino
1,*
1
Laboratory of Nutrition and Metabolic Surgery of the Digestive System, LIM 35, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-903, SP, Brazil
2
Laboratório de Investigação Médica em Envelhecimento (LIM-66), Serviço de Geriatria, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo 01246-903, SP, Brazil
3
Research Laboratory in Rheumatology, LIM-17, Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-903, SP, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2023, 15(14), 3246; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15143246
Submission received: 4 June 2023 / Revised: 19 July 2023 / Accepted: 20 July 2023 / Published: 21 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Geriatric Nutrition)

Abstract

:
Poor nutrition increases the risk of diseases and adverse health outcomes in older adults. We evaluated the potential inadequacy of nutrient intake among older adults in Brazil and its association with body anthropometry and composition outcomes. Dietary intake was obtained from 295 community-living older adults (>60 years old), of both genders, using a seven-day food record. Nutrient inadequacy was further identified based on the Dietary Reference Intakes and European Guidelines. Skeletal muscle mass (SM), strength and performance, and the diagnosis of sarcopenia were assessed using reference methods. Nutritional inadequacy was high, with energy, dietary fiber, and six micronutrients exhibiting the greatest inadequacy levels (>80%). Energy intake was correlated with SM strength (p = 0.000) and performance (p = 0.001). Inadequate energy, fiber, and protein intakes influenced BMI, while inadequate intake of vitamin B6 directly affected the diagnosis of sarcopenia (p ≤ 0.005). Further research is required to investigate whether these inadequacies can be associated with other clinical health outcomes.

1. Introduction

The older adult population is increasing worldwide, reaching 1 billion people in 2019 [1]. The World Health Organization (WHO) projects that this number will increase to 1.4 billion by 2030 and 2.1 billion by 2050 [1]. Unlike developed countries, low- and middle-income countries, such as Brazil, are experiencing demographic transition under unfavorable social, economic, and health conditions [2]. In 2020, 69% of older adults in Brazil lived with low income, defined as earning up to two minimum wages. This represents a serious challenge to the public health system, as the costs associated with health issues and specialized care tend to increase with age [3,4].
In this scenario, exacerbated vulnerabilities in social, physical, and mental health can occur, contributing to a loss of autonomy and increased dependency [5]. In turn, the loss of autonomy and independence amplifies functional, psychological, social, and structural alterations expected with the aging process, such as comorbidities [6], alterations in body composition [7,8], cognition [9], and food intake [10]. These changes heighten the risk of morbidity and mortality and contribute to a decline in the quality of life (QoL) of older adults [7].
Many studies have revealed poor diet quality [10,11,12] and inadequate energy and nutrient intake among older adults [13,14,15]. In Brazil, two National Dietary Surveys, conducted in 2008–2009 [16] and 2017–2018 [17], evaluated energy and nutrient intake across the population. Both surveys identified a high prevalence of inadequacy (>50%) in the intake of pyridoxine, thiamine, vitamin A, and magnesium among older adults. In the 2017–2018 survey, riboflavin inadequacy was also observed among men and older adults. The highest inadequacies (>85%) in both surveys were observed for calcium, vitamin D, and vitamin E [18].
The quality of food intake and nutrient adequacy are essential components of older adults’ QoL, as poor nutrition increases the risk of diseases and adverse health outcomes, such as sarcopenia, frailty syndrome, and disability [19]. Therefore, health professionals involved in geriatric care must be cognizant of nutritional inadequacy among older adults in their country and/or region. In this context, studies revealing nutritional inadequacies of older adults should be encouraged to support public policies and protect their health.
This study aimed to evaluate nutrient intake, its prevalence of inadequacy among older adults in Brazil, and its association with anthropometric and muscle mass variables. Our study also makes a valuable contribution to the existing national surveys by utilizing a 7-day food record (7dFR) tailored to the specific characteristics and needs of older adults [20]. The 2008–2009 survey used two 7dFR of non-consecutive days (97% response rate for the second record), while the 2017–2018 survey used 24 h recalls (24 hR) on two non-consecutive days (84% response rate for the second recall). Additionally, we conducted association analysis with muscle-related outcomes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Subjects

This was a cross-sectional study carried out in the Laboratory of Nutrition and Metabolic Surgery of the Digestive System (LIM 35), Gastroenterology Department of the Hospital das Clínicas of the University of São Paulo, School of Medicine. Data collection was carried out by the Group from the Center for the Study of Energy Expenditure and Body Composition (CEGECC) in partnership with the Laboratory of Rheumatology (LIM 17) and the Laboratory of Medical Investigation into Aging (LIM 66) of the same institution.
This study was part of a trial for the Diagnostic Evaluation of Sarcopenia in older adults. Patients registered with www.ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04451005; 30 June 2020) and the study was approved by the local ethics committee (CaPPesq 1.905.072). All participants provided informed written consent at the beginning of the study and all protocol assessments were performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki guidelines.
Participants were recruited from the Geriatric Outpatient Clinic of the Hospital das Clínicas of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Sao Paulo between May 2016 and December 2019. We included non-institutionalized men and women aged over 60 years who were able to answer questions asked in the anamnesis, complete screening questionnaires, and fill out the seven-day food record. We excluded elderly individuals with an amputated limb and using a prosthesis, and those with the presence of concomitant acute or chronic diseases that might interfere with the results, such as HIV, cancer, kidney, heart or lung failure, or decompensated diabetes.

2.2. Dietary Assessment

The dietary assessment was performed using a seven-day food record (7dFR). This is a prospective method that measures the usual intake and does not rely on memory, as foods are recorded at the time of consumption. The 7dFR data were provided by the participant or a family member. Detailed guidance was provided in order to reduce errors in reporting food and culinary preparations (Figure 1) [21,22]. To better estimate portion sizes, a manual with illustrations of different portion sizes and food models was provided [22]. Traditional kitchen utensils used to describe cooking units were also illustrated on the first page of the form provided for the 7dFR. Therefore, participants were instructed to register all beverages, food items, and culinary preparations consumed in cooking units, as described below:
  • Culinary preparations, such as pies, cakes, and soups, were recorded in detail, with an indication of the ingredient used and the method of preparation.
  • Processed and ultra-processed foods [23] were recorded, including the name and brand of the product.
  • Information regarding the addition of salt, sugar, oil, and sauces was recorded, as well as information on the consumption of whole or peeled fruits and vegetables; and diet and/or light food or beverage products.
  • Participants were asked to specify the type of juice (natural or bottled), type of milk (whole, reduced fat, low fat), type of bread and cereals (whole grain or refined grain), and type of meat (ex: chicken breast, beef chuck, pork rib).
  • Participants received phone calls on alternating days to remind them of the 7dFR and to clarify any doubts.

Nutrients Intake and Prevalence of Inadequacy

The amount of energy and nutrients intake was estimated from the 7dFR using the software Virtual Nutri Plus® v2.0. This software includes the Brazilian Table of Food Composition (TACO) [24] and Table of Food Composition: Support to Nutritional Decision [25]. The input was standardized, and preparations not included in the software database were added as a new recipe or item. In cases in which recipe information was lacking, we standardized the ingredients and yield from national publications [17,26], Brazilian culinary books, and websites. For processed foods, we consulted the information available on the manufacturer’s website. After standardizing recipes, we converted the cooking units to grams or milliliters [26].
The estimated nutrients were exported from the software Virtual Nutri Plus® to the researchers’ database. Total energy values were expressed in kilocalories (kcal) per day, while macro and micronutrients were expressed in grams (g), milligrams (mg), or micrograms (mcg) per day. For this study, we selected the nutrients considered important to older adults [27]: carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, dietary fiber, vitamins A, B1, B2, B6, 12, D, E, niacin, and the minerals calcium, copper, iron, phosphorus, magnesium, potassium, selenium, and zinc.
The prevalence of micronutrient inadequacy was evaluated according to the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) values proposed by the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs), considering the gender and age of the individuals, as shown in Table 1 [28].
For potassium intake, due to the lack of an established EAR value, we considered the Adequate Intake (AI) value [28]. Energy intake inadequacy was determined when values were lower than 30 kcal/kg for eutrophic and overweight and less than 35 kcal/kg for underweight individuals [29]. Protein inadequacy was considered when values were lower than 1 g/kg for eutrophic and overweight and less than 1.2 g/kg for underweight individuals [29]. Fiber inadequacy was considered when values were lower than 25 g/day [29].

2.3. Anthropometric Measurements

Anthropometric data included height and weight, measured while participants were barefoot and dressed in light clothing, using a scale accurate to the nearest 0.1 cm and 0.1 kg, respectively. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. All measurements were performed in duplicate, and mean values were calculated for analysis. The BMI was used to classify Nutritional Status according to Lipschitz’s (1994) [30] classification.

2.4. Diagnosis of Sarcopenia

The diagnosis of sarcopenia was established based on the methodology proposed by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older Persons (EWGSOP2) [31]. This approach defines sarcopenia as the loss of lean mass, accompanied by diminished strength and function.

Muscle Mass, Strength, and Performance

The appendicular skeletal mass index (ASMI) was calculated as an indicator of skeletal muscle (SM) mass, as described elsewhere [32]. Briefly, this was determined by summing the lean mass of the four limbs, as obtained by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and applying the following equation: ASMI = appendicular skeletal mass/height2 (kg/m2) [33]. SM strength was determined based on hand grip strength (HGS), which was assessed using an analog dynamometer (JAMAR®). During the measurement, subjects were seated in a height-adjustable chair, with their legs upright and their feet flat on the floor, to obtain a right angle in the hip, knee, and ankle joints. The test arm was kept close to the body, with the elbow flexed at a 90° angle, the palm facing the body, and the thumb pointing upwards. The arm that was not being tested remained supported and relaxed on the thigh [33,34]. SM performance was assessed by walking speed by measuring the time taken to cover a distance of 4 or 6 m [33]. Participants were instructed to fast for 4 h prior to these assessments and to abstain from physical activity (excluding light walking), diuretic use, and alcohol consumption for 24 h before these assessments.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables were expressed in summary measures (mean, median, standard deviation, and quartiles), while categorical variables were expressed in absolute and relative frequencies. The normality of continuous variables was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Correlations between energy and nutrients intake with muscle mass, strength, and performance were determined based on the Spearman coefficient. Fisher’s Exact Test was performed to assess associations between sarcopenia, nutritional classification, and polypharmacy (≥4 medications) [35,36] with energy and nutrients inadequacies. Age and gender-adjusted multivariable analyses were conducted to examine the relationship between nutrient intake and anthropometric and body composition indices, as well as sarcopenia. Multiple linear or logistic regression models were applied for continuous and binary outcomes, respectively. These models included variables that showed significant influence (p ≤ 0.05) on each outcome in a previous univariate analysis, also adjusted for age and gender. The stepwise forward method was used for variable selection, starting with variables with the lowest p-values. Each newly included variable in the multiple models had to maintain its significance without removing the significance of the variables included in the previous step. Residual analysis was conducted using the Shapiro–Wilk test, and multicollinearity was assessed using the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF). Variables with a VIF > 5 were excluded from the multiple regression model. Data were analyzed using R software (version 4.2). A significance level of 95% (p < 0.05) was adopted for all tests, and two-tailed hypotheses were considered.

3. Results

3.1. Participants’ Descriptive Data

The study included 295 older adults, with a mean age of 70.41 ± 7.48 years and a higher proportion of women (81.69%) compared to men (18.31%). The prevalence of overweight condition was notable within the group, while sarcopenia was present in 22.03% of the participants. Regular use of four or more medications was reported among many participants and 95% of the sample presented with at least one comorbidity (Table 1). None of the participants reported regular use of nutritional supplements.

3.2. Nutrients Intake and Prevalence of Inadequacy

The summary measures of nutrient intake and prevalence of inadequacy are shown in Table 2. The average daily energy intake was 1401.31 ± 452.01 kcal, representing 96.94% of inadequacy. Both protein and dietary fiber exhibited high levels of inadequacy, at 69.15% and 97.33%, respectively. Micronutrient intakes also displayed significant inadequacies. More than 50% of the participants had insufficient intake of vitamin B6, vitamin B12, phosphorus, and selenium. The greatest inadequacies among the micronutrients were observed in the consumption of Vitamin D, vitamin E, copper, magnesium, potassium, and calcium, with each showing more than 80% inadequacy among older adult participants.
When analyzing the associations between inadequacies of energy and nutrients intake according to nutritional classification, we found differences among groups (Table 3). Energy inadequacy was higher in normal and overweight participants (p = 0.001), while normal weight had lower inadequacies of protein intake (p = 0.000). Additionally, fiber inadequacy was higher among the overweight individuals (p = 0.005) and eutrophic participants had higher inadequacy for vitamin D (p = 0.028). We did not find differences in nutrients intakes inadequacies between the participants with or without sarcopenia (p > 0.05) (Supplementary Table S1).
A correlation between energy intake and SM strength (Rho 0.205; p = 0.000) and SM performance (Rho 0.189; p = 0.001) was observed. Likewise, fiber (Rho 0.133; p = 0.023) and iron (Rho 0.152; p = 0.009) intakes correlated with SM strength. Iron intake also correlated with SM performance (Rho 0.128; p = 0.028). Lastly, zinc intake correlated with ASMI (Rho 0.115; p = 0.048). Furthermore, Table 4 shows the multiple linear regression models adjusted by age and gender, revealing significant associations between vitamin B12, selenium with quantitative measures of skeletal muscle, specifically appendicular muscle mass, and appendicular muscle mass index (p < 0.01). Similarly, iron was identified as significant factor influencing handgrip strength and walking speed (p < 0.01), when adjusted by age and gender. Additionally, inadequate intakes of energy, total fiber, and protein, as well as inadequate intake of vitamin B6, were found to be significant factors related to BMI and the diagnosis of sarcopenia, respectively. The multiple logistic regression models confirmed the join significance of these variables for each of the respective anthropometric outcomes (Table 5). Finally, the use of polypharmacy was associated with insufficient consumption of vitamin A (p = 0.047) and dietary fiber (p = 0.016).

4. Discussion

Our study revealed a high inadequacy in the intake of energy, protein, fiber, and 63% of the evaluated micronutrients among older adults. These findings are noteworthy, as some of these macro- and micronutrients also exhibited correlations with relevant anthropometric and body composition outcomes. Furthermore, these inadequacies were found to significantly influence BMI and even sarcopenia, which had a prevalence of 22% within the expected range of 15.4% to 25.6% [37,38,39,40]. Overall, the participants were overweight, reported regular usage of four or more medications, and 95% had at least one comorbidity.
The nutritional inadequacies observed in this study are based on specific recommendations and guidelines tailored to older adults [28,29,41], which propose ideal values to maintain nutrients homeostasis in healthy individuals. It is important to clarify, however, that these inadequacies do not automatically equate to the manifestation of clinical health outcomes. Such outcomes are influenced by many factors, such as nutritional bioavailability and individual requirements, genetic factors, and overall nutritional status throughout life [42]. Nonetheless, considering that our participants exhibited anthropometric, health, and sociodemographic characteristics that are recognized risk factors for negative clinical outcomes [43], it is notable that nutritional inadequacies need to be considered as a contributor to these outcomes.
In this context, energy and protein inadequacies have been linked to the pathogenesis of sarcopenia and cachexia [44], and low protein intake alone with frailty status in older adults [45]. These conditions pave the way for outcomes that significantly impact the health of older adults [44]. On the other hand, our findings did not show differences in energy and protein intake inadequacies between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic older adults. We believe that some factors contributed to these results. First, the prevalence of inadequacies was high in both groups, which did not enable us to identify differences. Second, according to EWGSOP2 sarcopenia is recognized as a muscle disease and nutritional intake is one of the wide range of factors that contribute to sarcopenia development [31].
Nevertheless, we found correlations between inadequate vitamin B6 intake and sarcopenia. Experimental evidence has shown that vitamin B6 possesses ergogenic properties, and its adequate intake positively regulates the gene expression of various factors that promote skeletal muscle growth and repair [46]. In humans, vitamin B6 intake has been inversely associated with the risk of impaired mobility [47] and directly correlated with physical performance scores and chair-rise performance [48]. Furthermore, sarcopenic older adults have been found to have lower vitamin B6 intake and higher levels of homocysteine compared to non-sarcopenic older adults [49].
Moreover, we also found correlations between energy and some nutrients with muscle mass, strength, and performance. Indeed, other studies have reported a positive correlation between energy intake and skeletal muscle mass strength [50,51,52] and its performance in older adults [51]. It has been suggested that adequate calorie intake is critical to the maintenance of muscle quality and physical independence, since insufficient calorie intake may lead to muscle catabolism [52,53]. Iron intake inadequacy was low in our study and its intake also correlated with skeletal muscle mass strength and performance. It is known that iron is essential to skeletal muscle function since it is an essential component of myoglobin and hemoglobin [54]. This indicates that aerobic and muscle oxidative capacities are greatly dependent on iron [54]. Zinc intake inadequacy was also low in our study and its intake correlated with ASMI. Other studies also found an association between zinc intake and muscle parameters [55]. Zinc is an antioxidant nutrient with the potential to prevent or delay oxidative impairment of aged muscle decline [55].
In our study, energy intake inadequacy was higher in normal and overweight participants. Although we found differences in energy intake according to nutritional classification, the prevalence of inadequacy was very high among groups. Also, energy intake does not impact body weight alone; other factors must be considered, such as gender, physical activity, presence of diseases, and metabolism [56]. Accordingly, our multivariate analyses demonstrated that inadequate energy, protein, and fiber intakes had an influence on BMI. Notably, normal weight was associated with better adequacy of protein intake. This result alerts us to greater inadequacies of protein intake in both underweight and overweight older adults.
A high prevalence of dietary fiber inadequacy was observed among our older adults. It is well documented that dietary fiber plays pivotal roles—both directly and indirectly—in various organs and systems within the human body [57]. Consequently, the physiological benefits of adequate fiber intake include lowered glycemia, blood pressure, and cholesterol levels, along with modulation of gut microbiota and intestinal transit time [58]. Thus, a pronounced inadequacy of dietary fiber could contribute to the onset of metabolic diseases and constipation [58].
In our study, we found a positive correlation between fiber intake and SM strength, while its inadequacy was associated with higher BMI and was more prevalent among overweight individuals. Accordingly, being overweight and obese has been associated with low diet quality, including low food sources of dietary fiber. Similar to our findings, a recent study showed an association between fiber intake and BMI (β: −0.08 kg/m2; 95% CI, −0.10 to −0.05 kg/m2), relative total lean mass (β: 0.69 g/kg BM; 95% CI, 0.48–0.89 g/kg BM; p < 0.001), and relative appendicular lean mass (β: 0.34 g/kg BM; 95% CI, 0.23–0.45 g/kg BM; p < 0.001) [59]. The mechanisms related to the effect of dietary fiber on SM mass have been poorly explored [59].
Another interesting finding of our investigation was a noteworthy association between polypharmacy and insufficiencies in vitamin A and fiber consumption. These findings align with a study conducted in older adults residing within a community, which also observed a link between polypharmacy and a decreased intake of fat-soluble vitamins and dietary fiber [60]. It is important to acknowledge that polypharmacy (use of multiple medications, typically ranging from two or more to 11 or more) is a widely recognized condition that can significantly affect the health of older adults [61].
Moreover, numerous studies have reported a high prevalence of vitamin and mineral inadequacies among older adults [62]. In our study, the vitamins with the highest levels of inadequacy were vitamin D and vitamin E, followed by vitamin B6 and vitamin B12. The consequences of vitamin inadequacies can be significant. For instance, vitamin D deficiency in older adults can lead to alterations in the musculoskeletal system, heightening the risks of adverse outcomes. These include increased rates of hospitalization and institutionalization, as well as a higher likelihood of falls and loss of independence [63]. However, a low intake of vitamin D does not necessarily result in a low level of this vitamin in the body, as it can also be synthesized through sun exposure [64]. This is evidenced by a health survey conducted in São Paulo city (Brazil) which revealed that nearly 100% of the population had an inadequate intake of vitamin D, even though approximately half of the individuals did not exhibit a deficiency of this vitamin [43]. In our study, vitamin D intake inadequacy was higher among the eutrophic participants. This finding is different from that found in the United States [65]. However, the prevalence of inadequacy of vitamin D was very high among all groups, limiting our interpretation of this issue.
Vitamin E deficiency, though rare, can lead to sensory neuropathy and increased erythrocyte fragility. However, there is evidence suggesting that vitamin E intake exceeding the daily recommended intake (DRI) may benefit older adults by enhancing immune function, mitigating inflammatory processes, and increasing resistance to infection [66]. Furthermore, a study conducted in China linked a low dietary intake of vitamin E with a heightened risk of incident dementia among older adults [67]. In addition, La Fata, Weber, and Mohajeri [68] concluded that vitamin E could promote healthy brain aging and potentially delay the functional decline associated with Alzheimer’s Disease. These findings underscore the potential consequences of vitamin E inadequacy and highlight the importance of adequate intake, especially among older adults.
Among the B-complex vitamins, we observed a high prevalence of inadequacy for both vitamin B6 and vitamin B12. Vitamin B6 deficiency appears to be frequent among older adults, particularly those residing in nursing homes [69]. A Norwegian study revealed that even when intake was only marginally below the recommendations, B6 deficiency still occurred [69]. The authors emphasized that decreased absorption, increased catabolism, and impaired phosphorylation of older adults enhance the requirements for this population. More recently, the NU-AGE (Elderly Population for Healthy Aging in Europe) trial demonstrated a positive correlation between Vitamin B6 intake and improved physical performance in European older adults [70].
Vitamin B12 deficiency is also frequent among older adults [71], with contributing factors that can be attributed to malabsorption, nutritional habits, and drug interference (metformin, proton pump inhibitors, drug-affected purine, and pyrimidine synthesis) [72]. A deficiency in this vitamin is predominantly a risk factor mostly for megaloblastic anemia and various neuropsychiatric symptoms. It is therefore recommended that older adults incorporate food sources rich in vitamin B12 into their regular diet to promote overall health [72].
Inadequacies in calcium and phosphorus intake were also observed among the participants. It is well recognized that older adult populations are often at high risk of calcium deficiency due to decreased dietary calcium intake and absorption, medication interactions, and changes in bone formation and strength [73]. Adequate calcium intake can reduce the risk of fractures, osteoporosis, and diabetes in certain populations [73]. It is important to note that calcium metabolism is dependent on phosphorus, vitamin D, and protein [74] all of which also showed inadequate intake among the participants in our study.
Deficiencies in selenium and copper have been associated with age-related diseases due to an imbalance between antioxidative defense and reactive oxygen species (ROS) [75,76]. Indeed, one study showed that older adult individuals with Alzheimer’s disease exhibit lower selenium erythrocyte concentrations compared to their healthy controls [77]. Consequently, an adequate intake of selenium may be beneficial for preventing age-related diseases [75]. Also, dietary copper intake has been associated with longer telomere length, an important factor in cellular aging [78].
In our study, nearly 100% of the participants demonstrated inadequate intake of both magnesium and potassium. Magnesium insufficiency is common in aging populations, even though serum levels remain constant [79]. This insufficiency primarily arises from low dietary intake, compromised intestinal absorption, and increased urinary excretion [79]. Many human diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases, Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and other dementia syndromes, as well as muscular diseases like muscle pain, chronic fatigue, and fibromyalgia, have been linked to magnesium deficits. Thus, sufficient dietary intake of magnesium is recommended to maintain a balanced nutrient profile [79]. Similarly, low potassium intake has been associated with conditions like hypertension, cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney stone formation, and low bone-mineral density [80]. Moreover, potassium is a nutrient abundant in fruits and vegetables and has been considered a marker of a healthy diet [81]. Therefore, maintaining an adequate intake of potassium is essential, particularly for the older adult population.
Our findings reveal even greater nutrient inadequacy among older adults compared to the data from the Brazilian National Dietary Surveys conducted in the years 2008–2009 [16] and 2017–2018 [17]. This discrepancy might be attributable to the different methodologies used to assess dietary habits. Additionally, a Brazilian study reported a low daily protein intake of 65.12 g/day among 47 women [82] and the Health Survey of the City of Campinas (ISACAMP) highlighted a high prevalence of inadequate dietary fiber intake (86.6%) [83].
The 2015 Health Survey of São Paulo, Brazil (ISA-Capital) [84] demonstrated that the quality of diets among adults and older adults was associated with the presence of one or more diseases such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cancer, or hypercholesterolemia (β = 0.636, p < 0.001). In this context, it is noteworthy that most of our study participants regularly used four or more medications and 95% had at least one comorbidity.
Other countries also reported a similarly high prevalence of nutrient inadequacies in older adult populations. For instance, the National Health and Nutrition Survey (Ensanut) from 2006 and 2012 indicated that Mexicans older adults exhibited dietary deficiencies in vitamins (A, B-12, C, D, and folate) and minerals (calcium, iron, and zinc) [85]. In Europe, the prevalence of inadequacies in vitamin D, folic acid, calcium, selenium, and iodine was reported to be higher than 20% among older adults [86]. In the United States, older adults with obesity showed higher micronutrient inadequacies for magnesium (both sexes), calcium, vitamin B6, and vitamin D (women only) when compared to those of normal weight [65]. However, eutrophic individuals also showed a high prevalence of inadequacies for calcium (women only) and vitamin D and E [65].
Our study does have limitations. Firstly, the relatively small sample size and the predominance of females may limit the generalizability of our findings. Secondly, it should be noted that certain comorbidities and medications can significantly influence nutrient requirements and metabolism, factors that are not considered in the available references for determining nutrient inadequacies. Lastly, we did not measure nutrients biomarkers, which means we cannot imply that nutrient intake inadequacies were associated with clinical health outcomes. Given the prevalent nutrient inadequacies found among older adults in our study, the use of specially designed oral nutritional supplements could be considered. These supplements could help counteract deficiencies and enhance overall nutritional status, potentially improving health outcomes. However, their use should be determined in consultation with a healthcare professional, considering each individual’s specific needs. Further research is necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions in the older adult population.

5. Conclusions

We found a high prevalence of inadequate energy, macronutrients, and micronutrients intake among older adults. Although we did not find differences in energy and nutrient intake inadequacies according to sarcopenia, the intake of energy and some nutrients was correlated to muscle mass variables. Furthermore, inadequacy of the ergogenic vitamin B6 intake was shown to influence the syndrome. Also, we found associations between inadequacies of energy and nutrients intake according to nutritional classification and polypharmacy. Further research is required to investigate whether these inadequacies can be associated with biomarkers of nutrients deficiencies and other health clinical outcomes.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu15143246/s1, Table S1: Prevalence of nutrients intake inadequacies among older adults according to sarcopenia diagnosis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.V.M., A.C.C.V., N.C.L. and G.B.; methodology, N.V.M., D.L.W., A.C.C.V., N.C.L. and G.B.; validation, N.V.M., D.L.W., A.C.C.V., N.C.L., W.J.-F., A.L.B. and G.B.; formal analysis, N.V.M.; investigation, N.V.M., A.C.C.V., N.C.L., D.F. and T.P.A.; resources, W.J.-F., A.L.B. and R.M.R.P.; data curation, N.V.M., A.C.C.V. and N.C.L.; writing—original draft preparation, N.V.M. and A.P.A.P.; writing—review and editing, D.L.W. and R.S.T.; visualization, N.V.M., A.C.C.V., N.C.L. and G.B.; supervision, D.L.W. and G.B.; project administration, D.L.W. and G.B.; funding acquisition, D.L.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This publication was funded by “Nestlé Brasil Ltd.” who did not influence the conduct or reporting of this study, grant number 0001.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of CAPPesq (1.905.072; February 2017).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the participants of the research; the firefighters and the FMUSP concierge for the necessary support with moving the participants when necessary; and the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brazil (CAPES).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization (WHO). Ageing. Available online: https://www.who.int/health-topics/ageing (accessed on 29 May 2023).
  2. Saraiva, M.D.; Rangel, L.F.; Cunha, J.L.L.; Rotta, T.C.A.; Douradinho, C.; Khazaal, E.J.B.; Aliberti, M.J.R.; Avelino-Silva, T.J.; Apolinario, D.; Suemoto, C.K.; et al. Prospective GERiatric Observational (ProGERO) Study: Cohort Design and Preliminary Results. BMC Geriatr. 2020, 20, 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Síntese de Indicadores Sociais. Uma Análise das Condições de Vida da População Brasileira. 2020. Available online: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv101760.pdf (accessed on 27 June 2023).
  4. Ciosak, S.I.; Braz, E.; Costa, M.F.B.N.A.; Nakano, N.G.R.; Rodrigues, J.; Alencar, R.A.; Rocha, A.C.A.L. da Senescência e senilidade: Novo paradigma na atenção básica de saúde. Rev. Esc. Enferm. USP 2011, 45, 1763–1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Ceccon, R.F.; Vieira, L.J.E.D.S.; Brasil, C.C.P.; Soares, K.G.; Portes, V.D.M.; Garcia Júnior, C.A.S.; Schneider, I.J.C.; Carioca, A.A.F. Envelhecimento e dependência no Brasil: Características sociodemográficas e assistenciais de idosos e cuidadores. Ciência Saúde Coletiva 2021, 26, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Furman, D.; Campisi, J.; Verdin, E.; Carrera-Bastos, P.; Targ, S.; Franceschi, C.; Ferrucci, L.; Gilroy, D.W.; Fasano, A.; Miller, G.W.; et al. Chronic Inflammation in the Etiology of Disease across the Life Span. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 1822–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Trombetti, A.; Reid, K.F.; Hars, M.; Herrmann, F.R.; Pasha, E.; Phillips, E.M.; Fielding, R.A. Age-Associated Declines in Muscle Mass, Strength, Power, and Physical Performance: Impact on Fear of Falling and Quality of Life. Osteoporos. Int. 2016, 27, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Ponti, F.; Santoro, A.; Mercatelli, D.; Gasperini, C.; Conte, M.; Martucci, M.; Sangiorgi, L.; Franceschi, C.; Bazzocchi, A. Aging and Imaging Assessment of Body Composition: From Fat to Facts. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 10, 861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Abbatecola, A.M.; Russo, M.; Barbieri, M. Dietary Patterns and Cognition in Older Persons. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2018, 21, 10–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pinto de Souza Fernandes, D.; Duarte, M.S.L.; Pessoa, M.C.; Franceschini, S.d.C.C.; Ribeiro, A.Q. Evaluation of Diet Quality of the Elderly and Associated Factors. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2017, 72, 174–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Jyväkorpi, S.K.; Pitkälä, K.H.; Puranen, T.M.; Björkman, M.P.; Kautiainen, H.; Strandberg, T.E.; Soini, H.H.; Suominen, M.H. High Proportions of Older People with Normal Nutritional Status Have Poor Protein Intake and Low Diet Quality. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2016, 67, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Keller, H.H.; Carrier, N.; Slaughter, S.E.; Lengyel, C.; Steele, C.M.; Duizer, L.; Morrison, J.; Brown, K.S.; Chaudhury, H.; Yoon, M.N.; et al. Prevalence and Determinants of Poor Food Intake of Residents Living in Long-Term Care. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2017, 18, 941–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Koponen, S.; Nykänen, I.; Savela, R.-M.; Välimäki, T.; Suominen, A.L.; Schwab, U. Inadequate Intake of Energy and Nutrients Is Common in Older Family Caregivers. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. O’Connell, M.L.; Coppinger, T.; Lacey, S.; Arsenic, T.; McCarthy, A.L. The Nutritional Status and Dietary Intake of Free-Living Seniors: A Cross-Sectional Study. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 2021, 43, 478–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, Z.; Zhao, L.; Man, Q.; Wang, J.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, J. Dietary Micronutrients Intake Status among Chinese Elderly People Living at Home: Data from CNNHS 2010–2012. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística; Diretoria de Pesquisas. Coordenação de Trabalho e Rendimento Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares 2008–2009: Análise Do Consumo Alimentar Pessoal No Brasil. Available online: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/index.php/biblioteca-catalogo?view=detalhes&id=250063 (accessed on 29 May 2023).
  17. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística; Diretoria de Pesquisas. Coordenação de Trabalho e Rendimento Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares: 2017–2018: Análise Do Consumo Alimentar Pessoal No Brasil/IBGE, Coordenação de Trabalho e Rendimento. Available online: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/index.php/biblioteca-catalogo?view=detalhes&id=2101742 (accessed on 29 May 2023).
  18. Verly Junior, E.; Marchioni, D.M.; Araujo, M.C.; Carli, E.D.; Oliveira, D.C.R.S.D.; Yokoo, E.M.; Sichieri, R.; Pereira, R.A. Evolution of Energy and Nutrient Intake in Brazil between 2008–2009 and 2017–2018. Rev. Saude Publica 2021, 55, 5s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Guligowska, A.; Pigłowska, M.; Fife, E.; Kostka, J.; Sołtysik, B.K.; Kroc, Ł.; Kostka, T. Inappropriate Nutrients Intake Is Associated with Lower Functional Status and Inferior Quality of Life in Older Adults with Depression. Clin. Interv. Aging 2016, 11, 1505–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Volkert, D.; Schrader, E. Dietary assessment methods for older persons: What is the best approach? Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2013, 16, 534–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fisberg, R.M.; Marchioni, D.M.L.; Colucci, A.C.A. Avaliação do consumo alimentar e da ingestão de nutrientes na prática clínica. Arq. Bras. Endocrinol. Metabol. 2009, 53, 617–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Monteiro, J.P.; Chiarello, P. Consumo Alimentar: Visualizando Porções; Guanabara Koogan: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  23. Monteiro, C.A.; Cannon, G.; Levy, R.B.; Moubarac, J.-C.; Louzada, M.L.; Rauber, F.; Khandpur, N.; Cediel, G.; Neri, D.; Martinez-Steele, E.; et al. Ultra-Processed Foods: What They Are and How to Identify Them. Public Health Nutr. 2019, 22, 936–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. TACO. Tabela Brasileira de Composição de Alimentos, 4th ed.; NEPA UNICAMP: Campinas, Brazil, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  25. Philippi, S.T. Table of Food Composition: Nutritional Support for Decision, 2nd ed.; Coronário: São Paulo, Brazil, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  26. Pinheiro, A.B. Tabela Para Avaliação de Consumo Alimentar Em Medidas Caseiras, 5th ed.; Atheneu: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  27. Institute of Medicine (U.S.); Food Forum. Nutrition Concerns for Aging Populations. In Providing Healthy and Safe Foods as We Age: Workshop Summary; National Academies Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  28. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes: The Essential Guide to Nutrient Requirements; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  29. Volkert, D.; Beck, A.M.; Cederholm, T.; Cruz-Jentoft, A.; Goisser, S.; Hooper, L.; Kiesswetter, E.; Maggio, M.; Raynaud-Simon, A.; Sieber, C.C.; et al. ESPEN Guideline on Clinical Nutrition and Hydration in Geriatrics. Clin. Nutr. 2019, 38, 10–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Lipschitz, D.A. Screening for nutritional status in the elderly. Prim. Care 1994, 21, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cruz-Jentoft, A.J.; Bahat, G.; Bauer, J.; Boirie, Y.; Bruyère, O.; Cederholm, T.; Cooper, C.; Landi, F.; Rolland, Y.; Sayer, A.A.; et al. Writing Group for the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2), and the Extended Group for EWGSOP2. Sarcopenia: Revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing 2019, 48, 16–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Chang, K.V.; Hsu, T.H.; Wu, W.T.; Huang, K.C.; Han, D.S. Is sarcopenia associated with depression? A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Age Ageing 2017, 46, 738–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Yeung, S.S.Y.; Reijnierse, E.M.; Pham, V.K.; Trappenburg, M.C.; Lim, W.K.; Meskers, C.G.M.; Maier, A.B. Sarcopenia and its association with falls and fractures in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2019, 10, 485–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Beaudart, C.; Zaaria, M.; Pasleau, F.; Reginster, J.Y.; Bruyère, O. Health Outcomes of Sarcopenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0169548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Wongpakaran, N.; Wongpakaran, T.; Sirirak, T.; Jenraumjit, R.; Jiraniramai, S.; Lerttrakarnnon, P. Predictors of polypharmacy among elderly Thais with depressive and anxiety disorders: Findings from the DAS study. BMC Geriatr. 2018, 18, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Tefera, Y.G.; Alemayehu, M.; Mekonnen, G.B. Prevalence and determinants of polypharmacy in cardiovascular patients attending outpatient clinic in Ethiopia University Hospital. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0234000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Beaudart, C.; Locquet, M.; Touvier, M.; Reginster, J.-Y.; Bruyère, O. Association between dietary nutrient intake and sarcopenia in the SarcoPhAge study. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2019, 31, 815–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Karlsson, M.; Becker, W.; Michaëlsson, K.; Cederholm, T.; Sjögren, P. Associations between dietary patterns at age 71 and the prevalence of sarcopenia 16 years later. Clin. Nutr. 2019, 39, 1077–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Isanejad, M.; Mursu, J.; Sirola, J.; Kröger, H.; Rikkonen, T.; Tuppurainen, M.; Erkkilä, A.T. Dietary protein intake is associated with better physical function and muscle strength among elderly women. Br. J. Nutr. 2016, 115, 1281–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Alexandre, T.S.; Duarte, Y.A.; Santos, J.L.; Wong, R.; Lebrão, M.L. Prevalence and associated factors of sarcopenia among elderly in Brazil: Findings from the SABE Study. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2014, 18, 284–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gonçalves, T.J.M.; Horie, L.M.; Bailer, M.C.; Barbosa-Silva, T.G.; Barrére, A.P.N.; Barreto, P.A.; Campos, L.F.; de Campos, G.C.; Castro, M.G.; Celano, R.M.G.; et al. Diretriz Braspen De Terapia Nutricional No Envelhecimento. Braspen J. 2019, 34 (Suppl. S3), 2–58. [Google Scholar]
  42. Stover, P.J.; Garza, C.; Durga, J.; Field, M.S. Emerging Concepts in Nutrient Needs. J. Nutr. 2020, 150, 2593S–2601S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Martini, L.A.; Verly, E.; Marchioni, D.M.L.; Fisberg, R.M. Prevalence and Correlates of Calcium and Vitamin D Status Adequacy in Adolescents, Adults, and Elderly from the Health Survey-São Paulo. Nutrition 2013, 29, 845–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Agarwal, E.; Miller, M.; Yaxley, A.; Isenring, E. Malnutrition in the Elderly: A Narrative Review. Maturitas 2013, 76, 296–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Coelho-Júnior, H.J.; Rodrigues, B.; Uchida, M.; Marzetti, E. Low Protein Intake Is Associated with Frailty in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Suidasari, S.; Uragami, S.; Yanaka, N.; Kato, N. Dietary vitamin B6 modulates the gene expression of myokines, Nrf2-related factors, myogenin and HSP60 in the skeletal muscle of rats. Exp. Ther. Med. 2017, 14, 3239–3246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Struijk, E.A.; Lana, A.; Guallar-Castillón, P.; Rodríguez-Artalejo, F.; Lopez-Garcia, E. Intake of B vitamins and impairment in physical function in older adults. Clin. Nutr. 2018, 37, 1271–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Behrouzi, P.; Grootswagers, P.; Keizer, P.L.; Smeets, E.T.; Feskens, E.J.; de Groot, L.C.; Van Eeuwijk, F.A. Dietary Intakes of Vegetable Protein, Folate, and Vitamins B-6 and B-12 Are Partially Correlated with Physical Functioning of Dutch Older Adults Using Copula Graphical Models. J. Nutr. 2020, 150, 634–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Ter Borg, S.; de Groot, L.C.; Mijnarends, D.M.; de Vries, J.H.; Verlaan, S.; Meijboom, S.; Luiking, Y.C.; Schols, J.M. Differences in Nutrient Intake and Biochemical Nutrient Status Between Sarcopenic and Nonsarcopenic Older Adults-Results from the Maastricht Sarcopenia Study. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2016, 17, 393–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Lengelé, L.; Moehlinger, P.; Bruyère, O.; Locquet, M.; Reginster, J.Y.; Beaudart, C. Association between Changes in Nutrient Intake and Changes in Muscle Strength and Physical Performance in the SarcoPhAge Cohort. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rathnayake, N.; Alwis, G.; Lenora, J.; Lekamwasam, S. Factors associated with measures of sarcopenia in pre and postmenopausal women. BMC Womens Health 2021, 21, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Alhussain, M.H.; Alkahtani, S.; Aljuhani, O.; Habib, S.S. Effects of Nutrient Intake on Diagnostic Measures of Sarcopenia among Arab Men: A Cross-Sectional Study. Nutrients 2020, 13, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bhattacharya, S.; Bhadra, R.; Schols, A.M.W.J.; van Helvoort, A.; Sambashivaiah, S. Nutrition in the prevention and management of sarcopenia—A special focus on Asian Indians. Osteoporos. Sarcopenia 2022, 8, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Shoemaker, M.E.; Salmon, O.F.; Smith, C.M.; Duarte-Gardea, M.O.; Cramer, J.T. Influences of Vitamin D and Iron Status on Skeletal Muscle Health: A Narrative Review. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. van Dronkelaar, C.; van Velzen, A.; Abdelrazek, M.; van der Steen, A.; Weijs, P.J.M.; Tieland, M. Minerals and Sarcopenia; The Role of Calcium, Iron, Magnesium, Phosphorus, Potassium, Selenium, Sodium, and Zinc on Muscle Mass, Muscle Strength, and Physical Performance in Older Adults: A Systematic Review. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2018, 19, 6–11.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Hall, K.D.; Guo, J. Obesity Energetics: Body Weight Regulation and the Effects of Diet Composition. Gastroenterology 2017, 152, 1718–1727.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Venter, C.; Meyer, R.W.; Greenhawt, M.; Pali-Schöll, I.; Nwaru, B.; Roduit, C.; Untersmayr, E.; Adel-Patient, K.; Agache, I.; Agostoni, C.; et al. Role of Dietary Fiber in Promoting Immune Health—An EAACI Position Paper. Allergy 2022, 77, 3185–3198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. McKeown, N.M.; Fahey, G.C.; Slavin, J.; van der Kamp, J.-W. Fibre Intake for Optimal Health: How Can Healthcare Professionals Support People to Reach Dietary Recommendations? BMJ 2022, 378, e054370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Frampton, J.; Murphy, K.G.; Frost, G.; Chambers, E.S. Higher dietary fibre intake is associated with increased skeletal muscle mass and strength in adults aged 40 years and older. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2021, 12, 2134–2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Heuberger, R.A.; Caudell, K. Polypharmacy and nutritional status in older adults: A cross-sectional study. Drugs Aging 2011, 28, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Masnoon, N.; Shakib, S.; Kalisch-Ellett, L.; Caughey, G.E. What is polypharmacy? A systematic review of definitions. BMC Geriatr. 2017, 17, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Gana, W.; De Luca, A.; Debacq, C.; Poitau, F.; Poupin, P.; Aidoud, A.; Fougère, B. Analysis of the Impact of Selected Vitamins Deficiencies on the Risk of Disability in Older People. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kupisz-Urbańska, M.; Płudowski, P.; Marcinowska-Suchowierska, E. Vitamin D Deficiency in Older Patients—Problems of Sarcopenia, Drug Interactions, Management in Deficiency. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Dominguez, L.J.; Farruggia, M.; Veronese, N.; Barbagallo, M. Vitamin D Sources, Metabolism, and Deficiency: Available Compounds and Guidelines for Its Treatment. Metabolites 2021, 11, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Jun, S.; Cowan, A.E.; Bhadra, A.; Dodd, K.W.; Dwyer, J.T.; Eicher-Miller, H.A.; Gahche, J.J.; Guenther, P.M.; Potischman, N.; Tooze, J.A.; et al. Older Adults with Obesity Have Higher Risks of Some Micronutrient Inadequacies and Lower Overall Dietary Quality Compared to Peers with a Healthy Weight, National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES), 2011–2014. Public Health Nutr. 2020, 23, 2268–2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Meydani, S.N.; Lewis, E.D.; Wu, D. Perspective: Should Vitamin E Recommendations for Older Adults Be Increased? Adv. Nutr. 2018, 9, 533–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Liu, S.; Luo, J.; Xiao, Z.; Wu, W.; Liang, X.; Ding, S.; Zhao, Q.; Zhao, X.; Wang, Y.; Ding, D. Low Dietary Vitamin E Intake Is Associated with High Risk of Incident Dementia among Older Adults: The Shanghai Aging Study. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 1036795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. La Fata, G.; Weber, P.; Mohajeri, M.H. Effects of Vitamin E on Cognitive Performance during Ageing and in Alzheimer’s Disease. Nutrients 2014, 6, 5453–5472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Kjeldby, I.K.; Fosnes, G.S.; Ligaarden, S.C.; Farup, P.G. Vitamin B6 Deficiency and Diseases in Elderly People—A Study in Nursing Homes. BMC Geriatr. 2013, 13, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Grootswagers, P.; Mensink, M.; Berendsen, A.A.M.; Deen, C.P.J.; Kema, I.P.; Bakker, S.J.L.; Santoro, A.; Franceschi, C.; Meunier, N.; Malpuech-Brugère, C.; et al. Vitamin B-6 Intake Is Related to Physical Performance in European Older Adults: Results of the New Dietary Strategies Addressing the Specific Needs of the Elderly Population for Healthy Aging in Europe (NU-AGE) Study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2021, 113, 781–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Nalder, L.; Zheng, B.; Chiandet, G.; Middleton, L.T.; de Jager, C.A. Vitamin B12 and Folate Status in Cognitively Healthy Older Adults and Associations with Cognitive Performance. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2021, 25, 287–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Azzini, E.; Raguzzini, A.; Polito, A. A Brief Review on Vitamin B12 Deficiency Looking at Some Case Study Reports in Adults. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Beto, J.A. The Role of Calcium in Human Aging. Clin. Nutr. Res. 2015, 4, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Veldurthy, V.; Wei, R.; Oz, L.; Dhawan, P.; Jeon, Y.H.; Christakos, S. Vitamin D, Calcium Homeostasis and Aging. Bone Res. 2016, 4, 16041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Alehagen, U.; Opstad, T.B.; Alexander, J.; Larsson, A.; Aaseth, J. Impact of Selenium on Biomarkers and Clinical Aspects Related to Ageing. A Review. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Arredondo, M.; González, M.; Latorre, M. Copper. In Trace Elements and Minerals in Health and Longevity; Malavolta, M., Mocchegiani, E., Eds.; Healthy Ageing and Longevity; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 35–62. ISBN 978-3-030-03742-0. [Google Scholar]
  77. Nascimento, C.Q.d.; Barros-Neto, J.A.; Vieira, N.F.L.; Menezes-Filho, J.A.; Neves, S.J.F.; Lima, S.O. Selenium Concentrations in Elderly People with Alzheimer’s Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study with Control Group. Rev. Bras. Enferm. 2021, 74, e20200984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Lin, Z.; Gao, H.; Wang, B.; Wang, Y. Dietary Copper Intake and Its Association with Telomere Length: A Population Based Study. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Barbagallo, M.; Veronese, N.; Dominguez, L.J. Magnesium in Aging, Health and Diseases. Nutrients 2021, 13, 463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Bahmanpour, S. Guideline: Potassium Intake for Adults and Children; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  81. Rodríguez-Rodríguez, E.; Ortega, R.M.; Andrés Carvajales, P.; González-Rodríguez, L.G. Relationship between 24 h Urinary Potassium and Diet Quality in the Adult Spanish Population. Public Health Nutr. 2015, 18, 850–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Souza, L.B.de.; Martins, K.A.; Bomfim, R.A. Inadequate distribution of dietary protein and muscle mass in older adults. Geriatr. Gerontol. Aging 2022, 16, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Silva, G.M.d.; Assumpção, D.d.; Barros, M.B.d.A.; Barros Filho, A.d.A.; Corona, L.P. Low intake of dietary fibers among the elderly: 2014/2015 ISACAMP population-based study. Cien. Saude Colet. 2021, 26, 3865–3874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Mello, A.V.d.; Pereira, J.L.; Leme, A.C.B.; Goldbaum, M.; Cesar, C.L.G.; Fisberg, R.M. Social Determinants, Lifestyle and Diet Quality: A Population-Based Study from the 2015 Health Survey of São Paulo, Brazil. Public Health Nutr. 2020, 23, 1766–1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Cruz-Góngora, V.D.l.; Martínez-Tapia, B.; Cuevas-Nasu, L.; Flores-Aldana, M.; Shamah-Levy, T. Dietary Intake and Adequacy of Energy and Nutrients in Mexican Older Adults: Results from Two National Health and Nutrition Surveys. Salud Pública México 2017, 59, 285–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Roman Viñas, B.; Ribas Barba, L.; Ngo, J.; Gurinovic, M.; Novakovic, R.; Cavelaars, A.; de Groot, L.C.P.G.M.; van’t Veer, P.; Matthys, C.; Serra Majem, L. Projected Prevalence of Inadequate Nutrient Intakes in Europe. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2011, 59, 84–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Detailed guidance to fill the seven-day food record (7dFR).
Figure 1. Detailed guidance to fill the seven-day food record (7dFR).
Nutrients 15 03246 g001
Table 1. Sociodemographic and anthropometric characteristics of older adults.
Table 1. Sociodemographic and anthropometric characteristics of older adults.
VariablesTotal (n = 295)
Age, years70.41 ± 7.48
Gender, n (%)
Female241 (81.69)
Male54 (18.31)
Nutritional classification 1 n (%)
Underweight31 (10.51%)
Eutrophic123 (41.69%)
Overweight141 (47.80%)
Muscle outcomes 2
SMM, kg 316.43 ± 4.58
ASMI, kg/m2 46.59 ± 1.60
HGS, kgf 516.90 ± 7.00
Walking speed, m/s1.16 ± 0.35
EWGSOP2 6, n (%)
Sarcopenic65 (22.03)
Non-sarcopenic230 (77.97)
Comorbidities, n (%)
No comorbidities16 (5.42%)
1 comorbidity50 (16.95%)
2 comorbidities72 (24.41%)
3 comorbidities56 (18.98%)
4 comorbidities47 (15.93%)
≥5 comorbidities54 (18.31%)
Medications 7, n (%)
no medications29 (9.83%)
1 medication45 (15.25%)
2 medications38 (12.88%)
3 medications30 (10.17%)
≥4 medications153 (51.86%)
1 Body Mass Index according to Lipschitz (1994) classification. 2 Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation. 3 SMM = skeletal muscle mass. 4 ASMI = appendicular skeletal mass index. 5 HGS = hand grip strength. 6 EWGSOP2 = European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older Persons. 7 Regular use of medications.
Table 2. Nutrient intake and prevalence of inadequacy among older adults.
Table 2. Nutrient intake and prevalence of inadequacy among older adults.
NutrientsMean ± SD 1Median (Q25–Q75) 2Prevalence of Inadequacy (%)
Energy (kcal)1401.31 ± 452.011359.15 (1089.07–1634.00)96.94
Carbohydrates (g)181.30 ± 30.73181.57 (162.09–199.21)
Carbohydrates (%)56.71 ± 18.8054.47 (43.15–67.37)
Protein (g/kg)58.02 ± 12.6058.81 (51.31–66.13)69.15
Protein (%)18.40 ± 7.1917.46 (13.45–22.47)
Fat (g)41.32 ± 9.5741.97 (36.07–46.97)
Fat (%)29.37 ± 11.3328.66 (21.85–35.61)
Dietary fiber (g)12.54 ± 4.3011.98 (9.59–14.78)97.33
Vitamin A (ug)766.35 ± 862.76535.28 (328.4–908.94)48.52
Vitamin B1 (mg)1.12 ± 0.630.97 (0.81–1.22)11.53
Vitamin B2 (mg)0.86 ± 0.390.80 (0.60–1.05)34.91
Vitamin B3 (mg)13.53 ± 4.4812.83 (10.67–16.35)34.31
Vitamin B6 (mg)0.97 ± 0.380.90 (0.70–1.21)77.81
Vitamin B12 (ug)3.00 ± 7.051.28 (0.69–2.34)70.41
Vitamin D (ug)1.71 ± 7.130.45 (0.28–0.78)95.26
Vitamin E (mg)8.22 ± 3.397.66 (6.02–9.89)83.43
Copper (ug)4.63 ± 34.760.67 (0.56–0.82)100.00
Phosphorus (mg)560.71 ± 149.45542.93 (468.42–655.03)56.50
Magnesium (mg)134.43 ± 35.44133.66 (110.21–156.35)99.11
Potassium (g)1466.10 ± 406.431432.96 (1182.75–1725.03)98.22
Selenium (ug)46.68 ± 34.0940.81 (30.37–51.96)58.28
Zinc (mg)6.56 ± 3.745.97 (4.34–7.70)30.47
Calcium (mg)460.18 ± 180.04433.02 (317.30–567.37)98.81
Iron (mg)11.36 ± 14.869.01 (7.57–10.76)23.07
1 SD = Standard Deviation. 2 Q25 = quartile 25; Q75 = quartile 75.
Table 3. Prevalence of nutrients intake inadequacies among older adults according to Body Mass Index (BMI) classification.
Table 3. Prevalence of nutrients intake inadequacies among older adults according to Body Mass Index (BMI) classification.
NutrientsCategoryUnderweightEutrophicOverweightp-Value 1
Energy (kcal)Inadequacy27 (87.1%)122 (99.2%)141 (100.0%)0.000
Adequacy4 (12.9%)2 (0.8%)0 (0.0%)
Protein (g/kg)Inadequacy25 (80.6%)66 (53.7%)117 (83.0%)0.000
Adequacy6 (19.4%)57 (46.3%)24 (17.0%)
Dietary fiber (g)Inadequacy27 (87.1%)119 (96.7%)140 (99.3%)0.005
Adequacy4 (12.9%)4 (3.3%)1 (0.7%)
Vitamin A (ug)Inadequacy11 (35.5%)57 (46.3%)71 (50.4%)0.318
Adequacy20 (64.5%)66 (53.7%)70 (49.6%)
Vitamin B1 (mg)Inadequacy4 (12.9%)18 (14.6%)16 (11.3%)0.720
Adequacy27 (87.1%)105 (85.4%)125 (88.7%)
Vitamin B2 (mg)Inadequacy9 (29.0%)40 (32.5%)49 (34.8%)0.833
Adequacy22 (71.0%)83 (67.5%)92 (65.2%)
Vitamin B3 (mg)Inadequacy9 (29.0%)37 (30.1%)51 (36.2%)0.547
Adequacy22 (71.0%)86 (69.9%)90 (63.8%)
Vitamin B6 (mg)Inadequacy21 (67.7%)89 (72.4%)115 (81.6%)0.091
Adequacy10 (32.3%)34 (27.6%)26 (18.4%)
Vitamin B12 (ug)Inadequacy23 (74.2%)85 (69.1%)101 (71.6%)0.837
Adequacy8 (25.8%)38 (30.9%)40 (28.4%)
Vitamin D (ug)Inadequacy29 (93.5%)122 (99.2%)132 (93.6%)0.028
Adequacy2 (6.5%)1 (0.8%)9 (6.4%)
Vitamin E (mg)Inadequacy26 (83.9%)99 (80.5%)118 (83.7%)0.776
Adequacy5 (16.1%)24 (19.5%)23 (16.3%)
Copper (ug)Inadequacy31 (100.0%)123 (100.0%)141 (100.0%)NA 2
Adequacy0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
Phosphorus (mg)Inadequacy17 (54.8%)65 (52.8%)81 (57.4%)0.754
Adequacy14 (45.2%)58 (47.2%)60 (42.6%)
Magnesium (mg)Inadequacy30 (96.8%)121 (98.4%)141 (100.0%)0.085
Adequacy1 (3.2%)2 (1.6%)0 (0.0%)
Potassium (g)Inadequacy31 (100.0%)121 (98.4%)137 (97.2%)0.841
Adequacy0 (0.0%)2 (1.6%)4 (2.8%)
Selenium (ug)Inadequacy20 (64.5%)61 (49.6%)88 (62.4%)0.078
Adequacy11 (35.5%)62 (50.4%)53 (37.6%)
Zinc (mg)Inadequacy8 (25.8%)32 (26.0%)50 (35.5%)0.221
Adequacy23 (74.2%)91 (74.0%)91 (64.5%)
Calcium (mg)Inadequacy31 (100.0%)121 (98.4%)139 (98.6%)1.000
Adequacy0 (0.0%)2 (1.6%)2 (1.4%)
Iron (mg)Inadequacy9 (29.0%)31 (25.2%)30 (21.3%)0.542
Adequacy22 (71.0%)92 (74.8%)111 (78.7%)
1 Fisher exact test. 2 NA = Not applicable.
Table 4. Multiple linear regression models for nutrients intake (independent variables) associated with muscle mass, strength, and performance (outcomes), adjusted by age and gender.
Table 4. Multiple linear regression models for nutrients intake (independent variables) associated with muscle mass, strength, and performance (outcomes), adjusted by age and gender.
NutrientsSMM 1ASMI 2HGS 3Walking Speed
β [95% CI]β [95% CI]β [95% CI]β [95% CI]
R2 (0.25)R2 (0.11)R2 (0.24)R2 (0.10)
Vitamin B12−0.10 [−0.16; −0.03] **−0.03 [−0.06; −0.01] *------
Selenium−0.02 [−0.03; −0.01] **−0.01 [−0.01; −0.00] ***------
Iron------0.07 [0.02; 0.12] **0.003 [0.001; 0.006] **
* p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01. *** p < 0.001. 1 SMM = skeletal muscle mass. 2 ASMI = appendicular skeletal mass index. 3 HGS = hand grip strength.
Table 5. Multiple logistic regression models for nutrients inadequacies (independent variables) associated with body composition indices (outcomes), adjusted by age and gender.
Table 5. Multiple logistic regression models for nutrients inadequacies (independent variables) associated with body composition indices (outcomes), adjusted by age and gender.
VariableSarcopeniaBMI
OR [95% CI]OR [95% CI]
Vitamin B6 Inadequacy2.18 [1.03–4.64] *---
Energy inadequacy---14.38 [1.44–143.43] *
Fiber inadequacy---4.97 [1.01–24.35] *
Protein inadequacy---4.88 [2.06–11.58] **
* p < 0.05. ** p < 0.001.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Magalhães, N.V.; Waitzberg, D.L.; Lopes, N.C.; Vicedomini, A.C.C.; Prudêncio, A.P.A.; Jacob-Filho, W.; Busse, A.L.; Ferdinando, D.; Alves, T.P.; Pereira, R.M.R.; et al. High Prevalence of Energy and Nutrients Inadequacy among Brazilian Older Adults. Nutrients 2023, 15, 3246. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15143246

AMA Style

Magalhães NV, Waitzberg DL, Lopes NC, Vicedomini ACC, Prudêncio APA, Jacob-Filho W, Busse AL, Ferdinando D, Alves TP, Pereira RMR, et al. High Prevalence of Energy and Nutrients Inadequacy among Brazilian Older Adults. Nutrients. 2023; 15(14):3246. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15143246

Chicago/Turabian Style

Magalhães, Natalia Vieira, Dan Linetzky Waitzberg, Natalia Correia Lopes, Ana Carolina Costa Vicedomini, Ana Paula Aguiar Prudêncio, Wilson Jacob-Filho, Alexandre Leopold Busse, Douglas Ferdinando, Tatiana Pereira Alves, Rosa Maria Rodrigues Pereira, and et al. 2023. "High Prevalence of Energy and Nutrients Inadequacy among Brazilian Older Adults" Nutrients 15, no. 14: 3246. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15143246

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop