Next Article in Journal
Clinical Significance of Nutritional Status, Inflammation, and Body Composition in Elderly Hemodialysis Patients—A Case–Control Study
Previous Article in Journal
Cholesterol Exacerbates the Pathophysiology of Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis by Upregulating Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1 and Modulating Microcirculatory Dysfunction
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact on Fecal Microbiota and Health-Related Markers of an Intervention Focused on Improving Eating Behavior in People at Risk of Food Insecurity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

New Paradigms in the Diet and Microbiome Relationship

Department of Functional Biology, University of Oviedo, 33006 Oviedo, Spain
Nutrients 2023, 15(24), 5035; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15245035
Submission received: 5 October 2023 / Accepted: 10 November 2023 / Published: 8 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Paradigms in the Diet and Microbiome Relationship)
Decades of extensive scientific research have led to a consensus on the modulatory effect of diet in shaping the composition and activity of the gut microbiota. The gut (and in particular, the colon) represents the part of the human body most densely populated with micro-organisms (about 95% of the total number living in the human body), comprising bacteria, archaea, viruses and some unicellular eukaryotes that have co-evolved with humans in a commensal manner. This microbiota plays a crucial role in the preservation of the normal physiology of the host [1].
This Special Issue of Nutrients collected review and research articles with a common feature, the assessment of the impact of several types of diets and functional foods on the makeup of microbiota structure and activity, and consequently on health status. Research conducted on diets ranging from the Mediterranean to the ketogenic diet, as well as on the creation of vegetable beverages with lactic ferments, illustrates the complexities of this field of study, which is increasing.
Within the conditions closely linked to the composition of the intestinal microbiome are neurological diseases such as epilepsy, Alzheimer’s disease and autism [2,3]. Lim et al., in a comprehensive review, proposed the necessity to further investigate the role of the microbiota as a connector in the protective effects of this kind of diet on health [4]. For this purpose, several recent studies have been compiled in which this restrictive diet was associated with changes in some bacteria of the Proteobacteria phylum (Pseudomonadota), which are mainly involved in pro-inflammatory responses [5,6]. Even though these data open the way for new research in the field of the gut–brain axis, the authors highlighted the current limitations as well as limitations in reaching future scientific goals, and the possible detrimental health effects of this dietary pattern [7,8,9]. These authors also raised the controversial issue of the use of this ketogenic diet in extreme obese subjects, in whom other pathologies such as diabetes or hypercholesterolemia are usually present, to contribute to weight loss by means of microbiota modulation. Similarly to the above-mentioned studies on neurological disorders, they also focused on a reduction in some bacterial groups such as Proteobacteria against the increase in the phylum Firmicutes, proposing these changes as being useful tools for the management of obesity [10].
Food science has to evolve as society is changing, and in this regard it becomes relevant the review in which Mojikon D et al. argue for the need for a shift in the production of probiotic beverages in line with current lifestyle and consumer preferences [11,12]. In recent years, dairy beverages have been the predominant drinks in the probiotic market [13]. However, the presence of soy-based drinks, lactose intolerance and the rise of veganism have led companies to shift towards the use of plant-based drinks for probiotic purposes [14]. The review provides some reasons why the use of plant-based alternatives may be healthier. It compares the differential aspects between drinks of cereal or fruit and vegetable origin and discusses how these may influence the selection of a particular probiotic. In addition, the mechanisms through which carbohydrates in plant-based beverages can be metabolised by bacteria into metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids with a recognised impact on health are explained in detail. Finally, total soluble solids and sugar consumption are proposed as quality indicators of the fermented product, together with the amount of acid, the pH and the stability at a low temperature.
This Special Issue closes with a research paper by Zapico et al. [15], which shows the impact of implementing an educational program combined with an economic aid in order to promote a healthy Mediterranean-type diet in a group of people at risk of vulnerability. The results presented in this article illustrate the dietary targets in this sample group and how improvements in some dietetic variables, such as the consumption of fruits, vegetables and fish, have an impact on the composition and activity of the gut microbiota and on the presence of depressive symptoms [16].
The determination of potentially carcinogenic compounds derived from food processing and polyphenols with a high level of detail in association with the microbiota is possibly the most innovative aspect of this work [17]. Authors’ reported a decrease in the intake of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and nitrosamines after the intervention.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gentile, C.L.; Weir, T.L. The Gut Microbiota at the Intersection of Diet and Human Health. Science 2018, 362, 776–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lee, L.H.; Ser, H.L.; Khan, T.M.; Long, M.; Chan, K.G.; Goh, B.H.; Mutalib, N.S.A. Dissecting the Gut and Brain: Potential Links between Gut Microbiota in Development of Alzheimer’s Disease? Gut 2018, 67, A1–A118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pilla, R. Clinical Applications of Ketogenic Diet-Induced Ketosis in Neurodegenerative and Metabolism-Related Pathologies. Proceedings 2020, 61, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lim, J.M.; Letchumanan, V.; Tan, L.T.H.; Hong, K.W.; Wong, S.H.; Ab Mutalib, N.S.; Lee, L.H.; Law, J.W.F. Ketogenic Diet: A Dietary Intervention via Gut Microbiome Modulation for the Treatment of Neurological and Nutritional Disorders (a Narrative Review). Nutrients 2022, 14, 3566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. He, Z.; Gharaibeh, R.Z.; Newsome, R.C.; Pope, J.L.; Dougherty, M.W.; Tomkovich, S.; Pons, B.; Mirey, G.; Vignard, J.; Hendrixson, D.R.; et al. Campylobacter Jejuni Promotes Colorectal Tumorigenesis through the Action of Cytolethal Distending Toxin. Gut 2019, 68, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Brussaferro, A.; Cavalli, E.; Farinelli, E.; Cozzali, R.; Principi, N.; Esposito, S. Gut Dysbiosis and Paediatric Crohn’s Disease. J. Infect. 2019, 78, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. McDonald, T.J.W.; Cervenka, M.C. Ketogenic Diets for Adult Neurological Disorders. Neurotherapeutics 2018, 15, 1018–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Xu, Y.; Zheng, F.; Zhong, Q.; Zhu, Y. Ketogenic Diet as a Promising Non-Drug Intervention for Alzheimer’s Disease: Mechanisms and Clinical Implications. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2023, 92, 1173–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Tagliabue, A.; Ferraris, C.; Uggeri, F.; Trentani, C.; Bertoli, S.; de Giorgis, V.; Veggiotti, P.; Elli, M. Short-Term Impact of a Classical Ketogenic Diet on Gut Microbiota in GLUT1 Deficiency Syndrome: A 3-Month Prospective Observational Study. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 2017, 17, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Gutiérrez-Repiso, C.; Hernández-García, C.; García-Almeida, J.M.; Bellido, D.; Martín-Núñez, G.M.; Sánchez-Alcoholado, L.; Alcaide-Torres, J.; Sajoux, I.; Tinahones, F.J.; Moreno-Indias, I. Effect of Synbiotic Supplementation in a Very-Low-Calorie Ketogenic Diet on Weight Loss Achievement and Gut Microbiota: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2019, 63, e1900167–e1900177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Market Analysis. Probiotic Drink Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report by Product (Dairy-Based, Plant-Based), by Distribution Channel (Offline, Online), by Region, and Segment Forecasts, 2020–2027. Available online: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/probiotic-drink-market (accessed on 24 June 2020).
  12. Mojikon, F.D.; Kasimin, M.E.; Molujin, A.M.; Gansau, J.A.; Jawan, R. Probiotication of Nutritious Fruit and Vegetable Juices: An Alternative to Dairy-Based Probiotic Functional Products. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Global Dairy Alternatives Market Research Report. Available online: https://www.marketstudyreport.com/reports/ (accessed on 24 June 2020).
  14. Vasudha, S.; Mishra, H.N. Non Dairy Probiotic Beverages. Int. Food Res. J. 2013, 20, 7–15. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zapico, A.; Arboleya, S.; Salazar, N.; Perillán, C.; Ruiz-Saavedra, S.; de Los Reyes-Gavilán, C.G.; Gueimonde, M.; González, S. Impact on Fecal Microbiota and Health-Related Markers of an Intervention Focused on Improving Eating Behavior in People at Risk of Food Insecurity. Nutrients 2023, 15, 3537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Peters, B.A.; Xing, J.; Chen, G.C.; Usyk, M.; Wang, Z.; McClain, A.C.; Thyagarajan, B.; Daviglus, M.L.; Sotres-Alvarez, D.; Hu, F.B.; et al. Healthy Dietary Patterns are Associated with the Gut Microbiome in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2023, 117, 540–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mirmohammadali, S.N.; Rosenkranz, S.K. Dietary Phytochemicals, Gut Microbiota Composition, and Health Outcomes in Human and Animal Models. Biosci. Microbiota Food Health 2023, 42, 152–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

González, S. New Paradigms in the Diet and Microbiome Relationship. Nutrients 2023, 15, 5035. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15245035

AMA Style

González S. New Paradigms in the Diet and Microbiome Relationship. Nutrients. 2023; 15(24):5035. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15245035

Chicago/Turabian Style

González, Sonia. 2023. "New Paradigms in the Diet and Microbiome Relationship" Nutrients 15, no. 24: 5035. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15245035

APA Style

González, S. (2023). New Paradigms in the Diet and Microbiome Relationship. Nutrients, 15(24), 5035. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15245035

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop