Next Article in Journal
What Differentiates Rural and Urban Patients with Type 1 Diabetes—A Pilot Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Insights into Gut Microbiome Composition in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Comprehensive Examination of Dietary Habits and Environmental Influences
Previous Article in Journal
Ketogenic Diet High in Saturated Fat Promotes Colonic Claudin Expression without Changes in Intestinal Permeability to Iohexol in Healthy Mice
Previous Article in Special Issue
Modulation of Dietary Fatty Acids in an Open-Label Study Improves Psoriasis and Dampens the Inflammatory Activation Status
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nurturing Infants to Prevent Atopic Dermatitis and Food Allergies: A Longitudinal Study

by
Emilia Vassilopoulou
1,*,
Dimitrios Rallis
2,
Gregorio Paolo Milani
1,3,
Carlo Agostoni
1,3,
Gavriela Feketea
4,5,
Maria Lithoxopoulou
6,
Evangelia Stefanaki
7,
Fani Ladomenou
8,
Nikolaos Douladiris
9,
Caoimhe Cronin
10,
Codruta Alina Popescu
11,
Raluca Maria Pop
4,
Ioana Corina Bocsan
4 and
Sophia Tsabouri
2
1
Pediatric Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
2
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ioannina, 45500 Ioannina, Greece
3
Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy
4
Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400337 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
5
Pediatric Allergy Outpatient Clinic, Department of Pediatrics, “Karamandaneio” Children’s Hospital of Patra, 26331 Patras, Greece
6
2nd Department of Neonatology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, “Papageorgiou” General Hospital of Thessaloniki, 56403 Thessaloniki, Greece
7
Pediatric Allergy Outpatient Clinic, Department of Pediatrics, Venizeleion General Hospital of Heraklion, 71409 Heraklion, Greece
8
Pediatric Infectious Unit, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital of Ioannina, 45500 Ioannina, Greece
9
Allergy Unit, 2nd Pediatric Clinic, University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
10
Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University College Cork, T12 K8AF Cork, Ireland
11
Department of Abilities Human Sciences, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 40012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2024, 16(1), 21; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16010021
Submission received: 18 November 2023 / Revised: 14 December 2023 / Accepted: 16 December 2023 / Published: 20 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Relationships between Dietary Factors and Inflammatory Skin Diseases)

Abstract

:
Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) at a young age often precedes the development of food allergies. Although AD affects millions of infants worldwide, prenatal and postnatal risk factors, and their association with the development of food allergies later on, are not fully elucidated. This study seeks to investigate AD epidemiology in infancy and its risk factors, examining early-life factors (both prenatal and postnatal) that could contribute to the later development of food allergies. Methods: Between January 2019 and December 2019, 501 infants were included in this prospective cohort study. Longitudinal data collection was performed through maternal interviews, the first one conducted within three days after the delivery and the second within 24 to 36 months after the delivery, encompassing variables such as demographics, family history of atopy, maternal smoking, antibiotic use during pregnancy, the mode of delivery, breastfeeding history, food practices, and greenness exposure within 3 days from delivery, while they were still in the hospital. Results: Maternal smoking during pregnancy (p = 0.001) and an older sibling atopy history (p = 0.03) was significantly linked to AD incidence. Cesarean section delivery (p = 0.04) was associated with a higher risk of food allergies in infants with AD. Having a garden at home correlated with a higher likelihood of AD (p = 0.01), and food elimination without medical guidance (p = 0.02) due to AD correlated with an elevated risk of food allergies. Conclusions: Encouraging timely allergenic food introduction while promoting dietary diversity, rich in plant-based foods, maternal smoking cessation, and professional dietary guidance may help minimize AD and food allergy risk. Future studies should address the role of greenness in the development of AD and food allergies.

1. Introduction

Atopic dermatitis (AD), commonly known as eczema, is a chronic or chronically relapsing inflammatory skin condition primarily manifesting in childhood, with some severe cases persisting into adulthood [1]. It ranks among the most prevalent noncommunicable skin diseases globally, affecting up to 20% of children and 2–8% of adults [1]. In Greece, AD holds the top position among diagnosed skin conditions in children, accounting for 20.7% of pediatric dermatology referrals, highlighting its high prevalence in the region [2].
The pathophysiology of AD is intricate and multifaceted, arising from the interplay of environmental factors, compromised skin barriers, variations in the skin microbiome, and immune dysregulation among individuals genetically predisposed to AD [3]. Among modifiable risk factors, passive smoking stands out as a significant contributor to AD development [4].
Early-life dietary practices have been recognized as crucial for AD prevention for decades. Recommendations dating back to the 1930s endorsed exclusive breastfeeding for at least three months as a protective measure against AD [5]. However, this advice was debated in the early 2000s, with studies, including a Cochrane review, finding no added benefit of exclusive breastfeeding for six months compared to exclusive breastfeeding for three to four months followed by mixed breastfeeding (introduction of complementary liquid or solid foods while continuing breastfeeding) until six months in preventing AD [6]. More recently, a large-case control study in 2016 suggested that early weaning, defined as introducing solid foods at 4 or 5 months of age, reduces the risk of AD. Children weaned at 4 months showed a lower risk of AD compared to those exclusively breastfed, with the introduction of a variety of solid foods further diminishing the risk of AD [5]. This highlights the potential protective effect of introducing a diversified diet from four months of age while gradually incorporating solid foods alongside breastfeeding [5].
AD serves as the initial manifestation in the natural progression of allergic diseases, a phenomenon commonly referred to as the atopic or allergic march [7]. Frequently, dry skin observed at birth advances to AD within the first 2–3 months of life, acting as a precursor to subsequent atopic conditions, including food allergies, allergic rhino-conjunctivitis, and asthma [8]. In fact, food allergies to common items like hen’s eggs and cow’s milk can exacerbate AD in 30% of affected children [1]. Dietary elimination of these allergens is often recommended to alleviate AD symptoms. However, it is worth noting that elimination diets can negatively impact quality of life and increase the risk of future anaphylactic reactions [1].
Current discussions are focused on identifying primary prevention methods for AD and mitigating the development of additional atopic conditions, particularly food allergies in individuals with AD [9,10]. Furthermore, there is a growing need to adopt a multifaceted approach in identifying prenatal and dietary risk factors for AD, as well as factors influencing the development of other atopic conditions in individuals with AD [11]. Consequently, this study aims to explore prenatal and postnatal risk factors for AD development and identify individuals at heightened risk of developing other atopic conditions, specifically food allergy, through a prospective cohort study.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Population

The study recruited pairs of mothers and infants born in the Thessaloniki and Crete regions between January 2019 and December 2019. Mothers with a diagnosis of a chronic disease that used medication for its treatment, such as diabetes, autoimmune disease, cardiovascular disease, gestational diabetes, and/or infants born with a birth defect (congenital anomaly), were excluded from the study.
Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Venizeleio hospital Ethical Committee (ref. no. 08/130618_50(2)), and written informed consent was obtained from each participating mother, in accordance with the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

2.2. Study Design and Data Collection

After enrolment, mothers were invited to answer structured questionnaires through interviews. The initial round of interviews with women took place within 3 days from delivery, while they were still in the hospital. These interviews were performed in person by a trained researcher with an expertise in allergy (pediatric allergist or dietitian with an allergy specialty). A subsequent telephone interview was conducted within 24 to 36 months after the delivery.
During the first interview, the following data points about the newborn were collected: demographic data, including sex, place of birth, nationality, and parental education levels, parental history of atopy and any atopic history in older siblings, neonatal gestational age, birth weight, mode of delivery, parental smoking during pregnancy, and antibiotic use during pregnancy.
During the second interview, the following information about the infant was gathered: the current age of the infant, any doctor-diagnosed food allergy, history of asthma/viral-induced wheeze, and food anaphylaxis. Information regarding the breastfeeding (including history and duration of exclusive breastfeeding), parental smoking during the breastfeeding period, and antibiotic use after birth, the presence of younger siblings and any atopy history in them, the presence of a garden at home, and ownership of pets were also noted. Moreover, information regarding the complementary feeding practices were explored, including the time of initiation, the timing of the introduction of each food category (fruits, vegetables, meat, dairy, starchy products, fats, and lipids), and the first five foods introduced from each food category were recorded. Foods not introduced until the first year, and the reasons for the non- or late introduction, were noted. Data on the presence of emergency kits for the management of food allergic reactions, in the case of food allergy diagnosis and physician-recommended food elimination, and food-elimination practices without the physician’s guidance, were gathered, together with the reasons behind these eliminations and the specific types of foods that were removed from the study population’s diet. Finally, participant stratification was determined by the confirmed medical diagnosis of AD conducted by a pediatric allergist, with a notation of the age at which the first diagnosis occurred.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range), whereas the categorical variables were expressed as n (percentage %). The normality of the distributions of the continuous variables was assessed by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov. Comparisons between continuous variables were performed with the Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney test, whereas comparisons between the categorical variables utilized the chi-square test or the Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate.
Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine variables associated with AD (dependent variable), including those independent variables with a significant effect on the univariate analysis; namely, the place of living, the mode of delivery, living in a house with a garden, maternal smoking in pregnancy, paternal atopy history, and atopy history of older siblings. In addition, multivariate logistic regression was used to determine variables associated with food allergy in children with atopic dermatitis AD (dependent variable), including independent variables with a significant effect on the univariate analysis; namely, unsupervised food elimination before the onset of food allergy and the mode of delivery. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. All performed tests were two-sided and a p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant (alpha 0.05). Missing data were managed with standard listwise deletion. The data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results

Among the 519 pairs of mothers and infants initially recruited, 501 completed the follow-up study, comprising 87 infants with an AD diagnosis and 414 without AD. The sex distribution was similar between the AD and non-AD groups (56% vs. 53%, p = 0.64).
The majority (92%) held Greek nationality, with no significant variation between AD and non-AD groups (93% vs. 94%, p = 0.80).
The age at AD diagnosis ranged from 2 to 7 months (median: 5.5 months). Food allergies exhibited a significant disparity between AD and non-AD groups (p = 0.008).
Physician-recommended food elimination by doctors aiming to reduce AD exacerbations was recorded in 10% of AD infants. Additionally, unsupervised food elimination showed a significant difference between the two groups (37.9% AD vs. 2.9% non-AD, p = 0.004), with the main reasons for food elimination being the high-allergenic potential of the food as considered by the mother and the child’s refusal to try new foods (Table 1).

3.1. Familial Factors

Maternal and paternal education levels demonstrated no significant discrepancies between AD and non-AD groups. However, the maternal and paternal atopy histories exhibited significant associations with AD (24.13% AD vs. 4.98% non-AD, p = 0.049 and 27% AD vs. 21.98% non-AD, p = 0.02, respectively).
Maternal and paternal smoking during pregnancy and breastfeeding featured significant associations with AD incidence, with a higher prevalence in the AD group (Table 2). Maternal antibiotic use during pregnancy did not differ significantly between the two groups. The presence of older siblings significantly differed between the AD and non-AD groups (66.66% AD vs. 82.12% non-AD, p = 0.02). Moreover, older sibling atopy history also displayed a significant difference, with a higher prevalence in the non-AD group (22.41% AD vs. 7% non-AD, p = 0.005).

3.2. Perinatal and Early-Life Characteristics

The mean gestational age hovered at 34.4 weeks, with no significant difference between AD and non-AD groups. Similarly, birth weight showed no significant difference. The mode of delivery exhibited a notable difference between AD and non-AD groups, with cesarean section being more frequent among non-AD infants (p = 0.006).
The duration of breastfeeding and exclusive breastfeeding displayed no significant variations between AD and non-AD groups. A notable difference on food elimination was observed in breastfeeding, when mothers of AD infants more often eliminated milk, tree-nuts, peanuts, and pulses (including lentils, chickpeas, and beans) (p < 0.001).
A larger percentage of AD infants resided in houses with gardens (51% vs. 35%, p = 0.005). Approximately 32% of infants had pets, predominantly dogs (81%) (Table 3).

3.3. Complementary Feeding and Early Life Environmental Factors

No significant disparities were observed in the initiation of formula feeding or complementary feeding between AD and non-AD infants. AD infants experienced delays in introducing specific vegetables (mushrooms, green beans, okra, carrot, broccoli, sweet potato, onion, squash, celery, cabbage, peas, and cucumber) (p = 0.002) and fruits (strawberry, melon, watermelon, cherries, orange, lemon, pomegranate, and kiwi) (p = 0.02), but nuts were introduced earlier (p = 0.016) compared to non-AD infants. The type of fish introduced did not diverge significantly between AD and non-AD infants. Antibiotic use during infancy also did not exhibit a significant difference (Table 4).

3.4. Risk of AD

In Table 5, the univariate analysis shows that several factors are associated with an increased risk of AD in infants, including living in Crete, vaginal delivery (VD), having a house with a garden, maternal smoking during pregnancy, and paternal and older sibling atopy history. In the multivariate analysis, factors such as vaginal delivery (OR 3.11, 95%CI 1.27–7.61, p = 0.006), having a house with a garden (OR 3.84, 95%CI 1.50–9.80, p = 0.01), maternal smoking during pregnancy (OR 7.18, 95%CI 2.27–22.64, p = 0.001), and older sibling atopy history (OR 7.87, 95%CI 1.25–50.00, p = 0.03) remain significantly associated with a higher risk of AD.

3.5. Risk of Food Allergy in Infants with AD

Table 6 is dedicated to infants with AD and their susceptibility to food allergies. In both the univariate and multivariate analyses, factors such as unsupervised food elimination before the onset of food allergy (OR 6.63, 95%CI 1.31–33.46, p = 0.02) and cesarean section delivery (OR 3.58, 95%CI 1.05–12.19, p = 0.04) continue to show a significant association with an increased risk of food allergies.

4. Discussion

This prospective cohort study aimed to explore a multitude of factors associated with the incidence of AD in infants, shedding light on the complex interplay of heredity, demographics, environmental factors, and medical interventions during early life and the factors that might increase the risk of food allergy in this population. Our study supports that unsupervised food elimination in infants with AD reduces diet diversity and raises the food allergy risk.
Many caregivers unreasonably eliminated a wide range of foods, including major allergens, such as peanut, sesame, egg, milk, and shellfish, but also various fruits and pulses, without physicians’ guidance. It is noteworthy, however, that only in approximately 15% of the cases was elimination attributed to infants with AD refusing to eat the food, potentially indicating mild symptoms before a food allergy diagnosis. The remaining 28% who pursued an elimination diet without physicians’ guidance did so for other reasons. These included maternal fear, perceptions regarding allergenic or healthy foods, or concerns about exacerbating the AD. Past recommendations supported the delayed introduction of potentially allergenic foods in high-risk allergy infants, i.e., infants with AD or familial allergy history [12,13,14]. However, results from trials on high-risk allergy infants recommend introducing these foods between four to six months of age [15], and maintaining regular exposure to them to promote tolerance [16,17]. Previous research indicates that the late introduction or removal of such foods increases the risk of losing immune tolerance and experiencing food allergic reactions, and potentially hindering proper growth [18,19,20,21]. These findings stress the importance of the early introduction and consistent exposure to food allergens for preventing allergies in high-risk infants, which differs from our observations.
Furthermore, our study population exhibited the delayed introduction of foods, particularly fruits and pulses. This delay contributed to a decrease in dietary diversity. Fruits and pulses are known for their high dietary fiber and antioxidant content, which can have a notable anti-inflammatory impact, promoting immune tolerance [22]. These foods enhance the diversity and maturation of gut microbiota by acting as prebiotics and providing nourishment to tolerogenic microbes [23]. Hence, it is crucial to thoughtfully plan dietary strategies for AD management to prevent an elevated risk of other allergic conditions, particularly food allergies [24].
We additionally observed a noteworthy connection between the presence of AD in infants and an older sibling with a history of atopy. This emphasizes the hereditary aspect of this condition and highlights the significance of factoring in genetic predisposition when assessing an infant’s likelihood of developing AD [25].
Moreover, maternal smoking during pregnancy as a possible factor was linked to the occurrence of AD. This discovery is consistent with prior studies [26] that underscore the importance of both prenatal and postnatal smoking cessation [27,28]. Smoking has previously been recognized as a contributing factor to DNA methylation when offspring are exposed to it before birth [29,30,31]. As a result, a hypothesis suggests in-utero programming in early-life allergy development, which has been recently supported by a meta-analysis [32], which suggests smoking cessation for pregnant women and emphasizes the importance of avoiding secondhand smoke to prevent the development of AD [3].
Mode of delivery, stood out as a significant factor, with infants delivered vaginally showing a higher odds ratio for AD. Previous research supports that uncomplicated vaginal delivery is protective against allergic diseases, but research is limited for AD [33,34,35]. In their study, Mubanga et al., in 1,399,406 children, reported a higher risk of AD when children are delivered by instrumental vaginal delivery, emergency cesarean section, or elective cesarean section [33]. We assume that the result in our study is pertinent, especially given the notably high rate of cesarean sections within the specific population. Conversely, cesarean section was found to be associated with an increased risk of food allergies in infants with AD, in line with previous studies that have reported how cesarean section can disrupt gut bacterial colonization and lead to a reduction in specific beneficial bacteria [36].The presence of a home garden emerged as a significant factor associated with a higher likelihood of atopic dermatitis (AD) in our study. This finding contrasts with previous research suggesting that a greener environment is typically protective against allergies, particularly allergic asthma and allergic rhinitis [37]. This intriguing finding prompts us to consider the role of environmental factors in AD development [38]. Previous studies have proposed that the presence of a garden may introduce infants to a wider range of allergens which could influence their immune system’s response and increase the AD risk [39,40]. Additionally, the use of chemicals in the garden, such as insecticides and pesticides, as suggested by Buralli et al. in their review [41], could contribute to this phenomenon. Moreover, residing in a house with a garden may be associated with heightened hygiene measures, such as frequent hand-washing and longer bathing, which can contribute to skin dryness and trigger eczema flare-ups [42,43]. Nevertheless, further research is imperative to establish clear and definitive conclusions regarding the intricate relationship between home gardens, environmental factors, and AD development.
The study is subject to certain limitations, such as potential recall bias in parental reporting. Furthermore, information about the infant’s birth and upbringing environment was restricted to the presence of a garden. We did not explore whether gardens were maintained with possible irritants and proinflammatory elements (e.g., pesticides or herbicides), or consider factors like air pollution and the overall greenness in the environment.

5. Conclusions

The study emphasizes the complexity of AD and food allergies in infants with AD. Mothers of infants with atopy should refrain from smoking during future pregnancies, strive for vaginal delivery, and encourage a diverse diet upon introducing complementary foods. This diet should be rich in plant-based foods while avoiding the late introduction of common food allergens without a valid reason. Future studies should investigate the impact of green environments and related environmental factors on the development of AD and food allergies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.V. and S.T.; Methodology, E.V.; Formal Analysis, D.R.; Investigation, E.V., G.P.M., C.A., G.F., M.L., E.S., F.L., N.D., C.C., C.A.P., R.M.P. and I.C.B.; Data Curation, D.R.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, E.V.; Writing—Review and Editing, E.V., G.P.M., C.A., G.F., M.L., E.S., F.L., N.D., C.C., C.A.P., R.M.P., I.C.B. and S.T.; Supervision, S.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethical Committee of Venizeleio hospital, Heraklion, Crete, Greece protocol code 8/130618_50(2), approved at 13 June 2018.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wollenberg, A.; Barbarot, S.; Bieber, T.; Christen-Zaech, S.; Deleuran, M.; Fink-Wagner, A.; Gieler, U.; Girolomoni, G.; Lau, S.; Muraro, A.; et al. Consensus-based european guidelines for treatment of atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis) in adults and children: Part I. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2018, 32, 657–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Katsarou, A.; Armenaka, M.; Kosmadaki, M.; Lagogianni, E.; Vosynioti, V.; Tagka, A.; Stefanaki, C.; Katsambas, A. Skin diseases in greek and immigrant children in athens. Int. J. Dermatol. 2012, 51, 173–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Eichenfield, L.F.; Stripling, S.; Fung, S.; Cha, A.; O’Brien, A.; Schachner, L.A. Recent developments and advances in atopic dermatitis: A focus on epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment in the pediatric setting. Paediatr. Drugs 2022, 24, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cui, H.; Mu, Z. Prenatal maternal risk factors contributing to atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Ann. Dermatol. 2023, 35, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Turati, F.; Bertuccio, P.; Galeone, C.; Pelucchi, C.; Naldi, L.; Bach, J.F.; La Vecchia, C.; Chatenoud, L. Early weaning is beneficial to prevent atopic dermatitis occurrence in young children. Allergy 2016, 71, 878–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kramer, M.S.; Kakuma, R. Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012, 2012, Cd003517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yang, L.; Fu, J.; Zhou, Y. Research progress in atopic march. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Han, H.; Roan, F.; Ziegler, S.F. The atopic march: Current insights into skin barrier dysfunction and epithelial cell-derived cytokines. Immunol. Rev. 2017, 278, 116–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Du Toit, G.; Roberts, G.; Sayre, P.H.; Bahnson, H.T.; Radulovic, S.; Santos, A.F.; Brough, H.A.; Phippard, D.; Basting, M.; Feeney, M.; et al. Randomized trial of peanut consumption in infants at risk for peanut allergy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 372, 803–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Skjerven, H.O.; Rehbinder, E.M.; Vettukattil, R.; LeBlanc, M.; Granum, B.; Haugen, G.; Hedlin, G.; Landrø, L.; Marsland, B.J.; Rudi, K.; et al. Skin emollient and early complementary feeding to prevent infant atopic dermatitis (preventadall): A factorial, multicentre, cluster-randomised trial. Lancet 2020, 395, 951–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Venter, C.; Smith, P.K.; Fleischer, D.M. Food allergy prevention: Where are we in 2023? Asia Pac Allergy 2023, 13, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kakieu Djossi, S.; Khedr, A.; Neupane, B.; Proskuriakova, E.; Jada, K.; Mostafa, J.A. Food allergy prevention: Early versus late introduction of food allergens in children. Cureus 2022, 14, e21046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Alder, E.M.; Williams, F.L.; Anderson, A.S.; Forsyth, S.; Florey Cdu, V.; van der Velde, P. What influences the timing of the introduction of solid food to infants? Br. J. Nutr. 2004, 92, 527–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zutavern, A.; Brockow, I.; Schaaf, B.; Bolte, G.; von Berg, A.; Diez, U.; Borte, M.; Herbarth, O.; Wichmann, H.E.; Heinrich, J. Timing of solid food introduction in relation to atopic dermatitis and atopic sensitization: Results from a prospective birth cohort study. Pediatrics 2006, 117, 401–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Trogen, B.; Jacobs, S.; Nowak-Wegrzyn, A. Early introduction of allergenic foods and the prevention of food allergy. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Abrams, E.M.; Becker, A.B. Food introduction and allergy prevention in infants. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2015, 187, 1297–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Abrams, E.M.; Watson, W.; Vander Leek, T.K.; Atkinson, A.; Primeau, M.N.; Francoeur, M.J.; McHenry, M.; Lavine, E.; Orkin, J.; Cummings, C.; et al. Dietary exposures and allergy prevention in high-risk infants. Allergy Asthma Clin. Immunol. 2022, 18, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. David, T.J. Anaphylactic shock during elimination diets for severe atopic eczema. Arch. Dis. Child. 1984, 59, 983–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Flinterman, A.E.; Knulst, A.C.; Meijer, Y.; Bruijnzeel-Koomen, C.A.; Pasmans, S.G. Acute allergic reactions in children with aeds after prolonged cow’s milk elimination diets. Allergy 2006, 61, 370–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nachshon, L.; Goldberg, M.R.; Elizur, A.; Appel, M.Y.; Levy, M.B.; Katz, Y. Food allergy to previously tolerated foods: Course and patient characteristics. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. Off. Publ. Am. Coll. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018, 121, 77–81.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hobbs, C.B.; Skinner, A.C.; Burks, A.W.; Vickery, B.P. Food allergies affect growth in children. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2015, 3, 133–134.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Spolidoro, G.C.I.; Azzolino, D.; Cesari, M.; Agostoni, C. Diet diversity through the life-course as an opportunity toward food allergy prevention. Front. Allergy 2021, 2, 711945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Venter, C. Immunonutrition: Diet diversity, gut microbiome and prevention of allergic diseases. Allergy Asthma Immunol. Res. 2023, 15, 545–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chang, A.; Robison, R.; Cai, M.; Singh, A.M. Natural history of food-triggered atopic dermatitis and development of immediate reactions in children. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pr. 2016, 4, 229–236.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. O’Connor, C.; Livingstone, V.; Hourihane, J.O.B.; Irvine, A.D.; Boylan, G.; Murray, D. Parental atopy and risk of atopic dermatitis in the first two years of life in the baseline birth cohort study. Pediatr. Dermatol. 2022, 39, 896–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Saulyte, J.; Regueira, C.; Montes-Martínez, A.; Khudyakov, P.; Takkouche, B. Active or passive exposure to tobacco smoking and allergic rhinitis, allergic dermatitis, and food allergy in adults and children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2014, 11, e1001611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Schäfer, T.; Dirschedl, P.; Kunz, B.; Ring, J.; Uberla, K. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and lactation increases the risk for atopic eczema in the offspring. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1997, 36, 550–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tanaka, K.; Miyake, Y.; Furukawa, S.; Arakawa, M. Pre- and postnatal smoking exposure and risk of atopic eczema in young japanese children: A prospective prebirth cohort study. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2017, 19, 804–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, I.J.; Chen, S.L.; Lu, T.P.; Chuang, E.Y.; Chen, P.C. Prenatal smoke exposure, DNA methylation, and childhood atopic dermatitis. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2013, 43, 535–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sikdar, S.; Joehanes, R.; Joubert, B.R.; Xu, C.J.; Vives-Usano, M.; Rezwan, F.I.; Felix, J.F.; Ward, J.M.; Guan, W.; Richmond, R.C.; et al. Comparison of smoking-related DNA methylation between newborns from prenatal exposure and adults from personal smoking. Epigenomics 2019, 11, 1487–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Schmidt, A.D.; de Guzman Strong, C. Current understanding of epigenetics in atopic dermatitis. Exp. Dermatol. 2021, 30, 1150–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lau, H.X.; Lee, J.W.; Yap, Q.V.; Chan, Y.H.; Samuel, M.; Loo, E.X.L. Smoke exposure and childhood atopic eczema and food allergy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2023, 34, e14010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mubanga, M.; Lundholm, C.; Rohlin, E.S.; Rejnö, G.; Brew, B.K.; Almqvist, C. Mode of delivery and offspring atopic dermatitis in a swedish nationwide study. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2023, 34, e13904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kolokotroni, O.; Middleton, N.; Gavatha, M.; Lamnisos, D.; Priftis, K.N.; Yiallouros, P.K. Asthma and atopy in children born by caesarean section: Effect modification by family history of allergies–A population based cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatr. 2012, 12, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hoel, S.T.; Wiik, J.; Carlsen, K.C.L.; Endre, K.M.A.; Gudmundsdóttir, H.K.; Haugen, G.; Hoyer, A.; Jonassen, C.M.; LeBlanc, M.; Nordlund, B.; et al. Birth mode is associated with development of atopic dermatitis in infancy and early childhood. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Glob. 2023, 2, 100104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yang, X.; Zhou, C.; Guo, C.; Wang, J.; Chen, I.; Wen, S.W.; Krewski, D.; Yue, L.; Xie, R.H. The prevalence of food allergy in cesarean-born children aged 0–3 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Front. Pediatr. 2022, 10, 1044954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, X.; Zhou, N.; Zhi, Y. Association between exposure to greenness and atopic march in children and adults-A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 1097486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gilles, S.; Akdis, C.; Lauener, R.; Schmid-Grendelmeier, P.; Bieber, T.; Schäppi, G.; Traidl-Hoffmann, C. The role of environmental factors in allergy: A critical reappraisal. Exp. Dermatol. 2018, 27, 1193–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, Y.; Sun, S.; Zhang, D.; Li, W.; Duan, Z.; Lu, S. Effects of residential environment and lifestyle on atopic eczema among preschool children in Shenzhen, China. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 844832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Grafanaki, K.; Bania, A.; Kaliatsi, E.G.; Vryzaki, E.; Vasilopoulos, Y.; Georgiou, S. The imprint of exposome on the development of atopic dermatitis across the lifespan: A narrative review. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 2180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Buralli, R.J.; Dultra, A.F.; Ribeiro, H. Respiratory and allergic effects in children exposed to pesticides–A systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Koutroulis, I.; Pyle, T.; Kopylov, D.; Little, A.; Gaughan, J.; Kratimenos, P. The association between bathing habits and severity of atopic dermatitis in children. Clin. Pediatr. 2016, 55, 176–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Pecoraro, L.; Chiaffoni, G.; Piacentini, G.; Pietrobelli, A. The need of an updated culture of “occupational” atopic hand dermatitis in children at the time of COVID-19. Acta Biomed. 2022, 93, e2022324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Demographic characteristics and personal atopy history of the study participants.
Table 1. Demographic characteristics and personal atopy history of the study participants.
Total Cohort (n = 501)AD
(n = 87)
Non-AD (n = 414)p-Value
Age, years2 (2–3)2 (2–3)2 (2–3)0.50
Sex, male268 (54%)49 (56%)219 (53%)0.64
Place of birth 0.04
Thessaloniki165 (60%)15 (43%)150 (62%)
Crete112 (40%)20 (57%)92 (38%)
Nationality, Greek474 (92%)81 (93%)390 (94%)0.80
Age at diagnosis (months) 5.5 (2–7)n/an/a
Weight at diagnosis (kg) 12.3 (6.8–13.4)n/an/a
Height at diagnosis (cm) 69 (68–70) n/a
Food elimination by doctor (because of AD) 9 (10%)
(1 egg, 4 milk, 2 nuts, 2 other)
Food elimination without doctors’ guidance45 (9%)33 (37.9%)12 (2.9%)0.004
Reason for elimination
Child refuses to try13 (2.59%)13 (14.9%)4 (0.97%)
Mom considers it as highly allergenic15 (2.99%)11 (12.64%)4 (0.97%
Mom does not consider it as healthy choice9 (1.8%)9 (10.34%)4 (0.97%)
Mom afraid of AD exacerbation8 (1.6%)8 (9.2%)0
Main Foods eliminated
Milk5 (1%)5 (5.75%)0
Egg2 (0.4%)2 (2.30%)0
Peanut2 (0.4%)1 (2.3%)2 (0.48%)
Sesame1 (0.2%)0 (0%)2 (0.48%)
Lentils1 (0.2%)1 (1.15%)0
Pulses (beans, chickpeas)1 (0.2%)1 (1.15%)0
Shellfish2 (0.4%)2 (9.2%)0
Strawberry4 (0.2%)4 (1.15%)0
Fig3 (0.6%)3 (3.45%)0
Orange2 (0.4%)2 (9.2%)0
Peach3 (0.6%)3 (3.45%)0
Apple2 (0.4%)2 (9.2%)0
Kiwi1 (0.2%)1 (1.15%)0
Beef3 (0.6%)3 (3.45%)0
Spicy foods1 (0.2%)1 (1.15%)0
Sugar4 (0.8%)4 (4.60%)0
Food Allergy 0.008
No431 (86%)64 (74%)367 (88%)
Milk40 (8%)12 (14%)28 (7%)
Egg6 (1%)3 (3%)3 (1%)
Nuts4 (1%)1 (1%)3 (1%)
Other21 (4%)7 (8%)14 (3%)
Anaphylaxis6 (1%)3 (3%)3 (1%)0.07
Food that caused anaphylaxis 1.00
Milk 4 (31%)2 (40%)2 (25%)
Egg8 (61%)3 (60%)5 (63%)
Sesame/Tahini1 (8%)01 (12%)
Emergency Kit6 (1%)5 (8%)1 (0.2%)0.001
AD: atopic dermatitis; kg: kilograms; cm: centimeters; n/a (not applicable). Values are presented as mean (±SD), median (IQR), or sum (percentage). Statistically significant differences were considered p-values ≤ 0.05.
Table 2. Familial characteristics and atopic history.
Table 2. Familial characteristics and atopic history.
Total Cohort (n = 501)AD (n = 87)Non-AD (n = 414)p-Value
Maternal Education 1.00
Elementary2 (0.5%)02 (0.5%)
High School167 (34%)29 (34%)138 (34%)
Technical School79 (16%)14 (17%)65 (16%)
University241 (49.5%)41 (49%)200 (49.5%)
Paternal Education 0.10
Elementary9 (2%)4 (5%)5 (1%)
High School200 (42%)38 (46%)162 (42%)
Technical School73 (16%)13 (16%)60 (16%)
University188 (40%)27 (33%)161 (42%)
Maternal atopy history 0.05
No383 (79%)62 (75%)320 (79%)
Food allergy39 (8%)4 (5%)35 (9%)
Asthma16 (3%)6 (7%)10 (3%)
Eczema9 (2%)4 (5%)5 (1%)
AD6 (1%)2 (2%)4 (1%)
Rhinitis30 (6%)5 (6%)25 (6%)
Drugs4 (1%)04 (1%)
Paternal Atopy history 0.02
No376 (77%)62 (72%)314 (78%)
Food allergy45 (9%)4 (5%)41 (10%)
Asthma21 (4%)4 (5%)17 (4.2%)
Eczema9 (2%)2 (2%)7 (2%)
AD2 (0.4%)1 (1%)1 (0.2%)
Rhinitis26 (5%)11 (13%)15 (4%)
Drugs12 (2%)2 (2%)10 (3%)
Maternal smoking in pregnancy63 (13%)20 (23%)43 (10%)0.002
Maternal smoking in breastfeeding48 (10%)15 (17%)33 (9%)0.02
Maternal smoking during the first 3 years of life122 (25%)25 (30%)97 (24%)0.27
Paternal smoking during the first 3 years of life265 (53%)46 (53%)219 (53%)1.00
Number of siblings1 (0–1)1 (0–1)1 (0–1)0.54
Number of older siblings0 (0–1)1 (0–1)0 (0–1)0.04
Older Sibling atopic history 0.005
No361 (91%)45 (78%)316 (93%)
Food allergy12 (3%)5 (9%)7 (2%)
Asthma7 (2%)2 (3%)5 (2%)
Eczema4 (1%)2 (3%)2 (1%)
AD4 (1%)1 (2%)3 (1%)
Rhinitis9 (2%)3 (5%)6 (2%)
Drugs1 (0.3%)01 (0.3%)
AD: atopic dermatitis. Values are presented as sum (percentage). Statistically significant differences were considered p-values ≤ 0.05.
Table 3. Perinatal factors of the studied population.
Table 3. Perinatal factors of the studied population.
Total Cohort (n = 501)AD (n = 87)Non-AD (n = 414)p-Value
Gestational age, weeks34.4 ± 2.834.6 ± 3.434.3 ± 2.80.73
Birth weight, gr3073 ± 6293079 ± 6573071 ± 6260.92
Mode of Delivery 0.006
Vaginal166 (33%)40 (47%)126 (31%)
Cesarean section333(67%)46 (53%)287 (69%)
Duration of breastfeeding, months4 (0.3–12)3 (1.1–14.5)4 (0–12)0.07
Duration of exclusive breastfeeding, months3 (0–6)2 (0–5)3 (0–6)0.10
Food elimination during pregnancy99 (22%)17 (22%)82 (23%)1.00
Milk 4 (7%)04 (10%)0.65
Beef9 (175)3 (25%)6 (14%)
Fish 9 (17%)3 (35%)6 (14%)
Bread4 (7%)1 (8%)3 (7%)
Spicy food beans 5 (9%)05 (12%)
Other 23 (43%)5 (42%)18 (43%)
Reason for elimination in pregnancy 0.40
Never had it in her diet12 (15%)3 (20%)9 (14%)
Does not consider it a healthy choice22 (27%)4 (27%)18 (28%)
GI symptoms when consumed26 (33%)2 (13%)24 (36%)
Fear of increasing the infant’s allergy risk13 (16%)4 (27%)9 (14%)
Other7 (9%)2 (13%)5 (8%)
Food elimination during breastfeeding 0.001
Milk20 (4%)4 (5%)16 (4%)
Nuts14 (3%)5 (6%)9 (2%)
Pulses9 (2%)3 (4%)6 (2%)
Other 35 (7%)14 (17%)21 (5%)
Reason for elimination in breastfeeding <0.001
Never had it in her diet9 (3%)2 (4%)7 (3%)
Does not consider it a healthy choice13 (4%)2 (4%)11 (4%)
GI symptoms when consumed16 (5%)7 (15%)9 (4%)
Fear of inducing the infant’s AD exacerbation20 (7%)6 (13%)14 (6%)
Observed symptoms in the infant15 (5%)7 (15%)8 (3%)
Antibiotics during pregnancy78 (16%)12 (14%)66 (16%)0.63
Area of living 0.88
Urban397 (80%)69 (80%)328 (79%)
Rural103 (20%)17 (20%)86 (21%)
House with a garden187 (38%)44 (51%)143 (35%)0.005
Pets158 (32%)25 (29%)133 (33%)0.53
Type of pet 1.00
Dog107 (82%)19 (90%)88 (81%)
Cat10 (7%)1 (5%)9 (8%)
Horse1 (1%)01 (1%)
Chicken2 (2%)02 (2%)
Canary2 (2%)02 (2%)
Fish/Turtle2 (2%)02 (2%)
Other5 (4%)1 (5%)4 (4%)
Age that a pet was introduced in the household (months)1 (0.1–4)1 (1–7)1 (0–4)0.54
AD: atopic dermatitis; GI: gastrointestinal. Values are presented as mean (±SD), median (IQR), or sum (percentage). Statistically significant differences were considered p-values ≤ 0.05.
Table 4. Complementary feeding and early life environmental factors.
Table 4. Complementary feeding and early life environmental factors.
Total Cohort (n = 501)AD (n = 87)Non-AD (n = 414)p-Value
Formula feeding, months3 (1–6)3 (1–6)3 (1–6)0.87
Formula type 0.66
Normal249 (73%)38 (83%)211 (72%)
Partial hydrolyzed58 (17%)6 (13%)52 (18%)
Fully hydrolyzed9 (3%)09 (3%)
Elemental15 (4%)1 (2%)14 (5%)
Other7 (3%)1 (2%)6 (2%)
Complementary feeding, months6 (5–6)6 (5–6)6 (5–6)0.76
Foods in pieces, months9 (7–11)8 (6–11)9 (7–11)0.19
Vegetables, months6 (5.5–6)6 (5.2–6)6 (5.5–6)0.47
Vegetables delayed after 12 months10 (0–14)4 (0–10)10 (3–14)0.002
Fruits, months6 (5–6)6 (5–6)6 (5–6)0.36
Fruits delayed after 12 months10 (5–10.4)10 (3–10)10 (5–10.4)0.02
Starch–gluten, months8 (6–11)8 (7–10)8 (6–12)0.41
Trahanas, months10 (7–12)9.5 (7–11)10 (7–12)0.33
Oat, months8 (7–12)8 (7–10)9 (7–12)0.21
Fish, months11 (8–12)10 (8–12)11 (8–12)0.52
Hard-boiled egg, months10 (8–12)9 (8–12)10 (8–12)0.66
Runny egg, months10 (8–12)10 (8–12)10 (8–12)0.97
Raw egg, months1 (1–1)1 (1–1)1 (1–1)0.30
Nuts, months13 (12–18)12 (11–14)14 (12–20)0.02
Nut butter, months12 (11–20)12 (10–17)13 (11–20)0.33
Peanut, months15 (12–24)13 (12–24)16 (12–24)0.77
Peanut butter, months13 (12–24)12 (12–18)13 (12–24)0.93
Sesame, months12 (10–12)12 (10–12.5)12 (10–12)0.48
Tahini, months12 (11–16)12 (12–14)12 (11–16)0.54
Vegetables first included 0.19
Not yet started42 (94%)2 (67%)40 (96%)
Carrot1 (2%)01 (2%)
Sweet potato1 (2%)1 (33%)0
Tomato1 (2%)01 (2%)
Type of fish 0.56
Cod138 (54%)34 (62%)104 (52%)
Redfish38 (15%)8 (15%)30 (15%)
Bream 37 (15%)5 (9%)32 (16%)
Perch4 (2%)1 (2%)3 (2%)
Sole13 (5%)2 (4%)11 (6%)
Pike1 (0.4%)01 (1%)
Bass3 (1%)03 (2%)
Salmon1 (0.4%)01 (2%)
Fish1 (0.4%)1 (2%)0
Scorpion4 (2%)2 (4%)2 (1%)
Swordfish1 (0.4%)1 (2%)0
Pagasius1 (0.4%)01 (1%)
Combination13 (5%)1 (2%)12 (8%)
Antibiotics times0 (0–1)0 (0–1)0 (0–1)0.12
Antibiotics first use, months4 (1–12)8 (5–12)6 (2–12)0.54
Antibiotics during the first 3 years of age204 (41%)32 (37%)172 (42%)0.47
AD: atopic dermatitis. Values are presented as mean (±SD), median (IQR), or sum (percentage). Statistically significant differences were considered p-values ≤ 0.05.
Table 5. Logistic regression analysis in infants and the risk of AD.
Table 5. Logistic regression analysis in infants and the risk of AD.
OR95% CIp-Value
AD (Univariate analysis)
Crete2.171.06–4.540.03
Mode of delivery, vaginal delivery1.191.23–3.170.005
House with garden1.971.23–3.160.004
Maternal smoking in pregnancy2.561.42–4.630.002
Paternal atopy history1.181.03–1.350.01
Older sibling atopy history1.331.07–1.660.01
AD (Multivariate analysis)
Mode of delivery, vaginal delivery3.111.27–7.610.006
House with garden3.841.50–9.800.01
Maternal smoking in pregnancy7.182.27–22.640.001
Older sibling atopy history7.871.25–50.000.03
AD: atopic dermatitis; OR: odds ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval. Statistically significant differences were considered p-values ≤ 0.05.
Table 6. Risk factor of food allergy in infants with AD.
Table 6. Risk factor of food allergy in infants with AD.
OR95% CIp-Value
Food allergy (Univariate analysis)
Unsupervised food elimination before the onset of food allergy, yes6.111.30–28.530.02
Mode of delivery, cesarean section3.441.10–10.750.03
Food allergy (Multivariate analysis)
Unsupervised food elimination before the onset of food allergy, yes6.631.31–33.460.02
Mode of delivery, cesarean section3.581.05–12.190.04
AD: atopic dermatitis; OR: odds ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval. Statistically significant differences were considered p-values ≤ 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vassilopoulou, E.; Rallis, D.; Milani, G.P.; Agostoni, C.; Feketea, G.; Lithoxopoulou, M.; Stefanaki, E.; Ladomenou, F.; Douladiris, N.; Cronin, C.; et al. Nurturing Infants to Prevent Atopic Dermatitis and Food Allergies: A Longitudinal Study. Nutrients 2024, 16, 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16010021

AMA Style

Vassilopoulou E, Rallis D, Milani GP, Agostoni C, Feketea G, Lithoxopoulou M, Stefanaki E, Ladomenou F, Douladiris N, Cronin C, et al. Nurturing Infants to Prevent Atopic Dermatitis and Food Allergies: A Longitudinal Study. Nutrients. 2024; 16(1):21. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16010021

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vassilopoulou, Emilia, Dimitrios Rallis, Gregorio Paolo Milani, Carlo Agostoni, Gavriela Feketea, Maria Lithoxopoulou, Evangelia Stefanaki, Fani Ladomenou, Nikolaos Douladiris, Caoimhe Cronin, and et al. 2024. "Nurturing Infants to Prevent Atopic Dermatitis and Food Allergies: A Longitudinal Study" Nutrients 16, no. 1: 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16010021

APA Style

Vassilopoulou, E., Rallis, D., Milani, G. P., Agostoni, C., Feketea, G., Lithoxopoulou, M., Stefanaki, E., Ladomenou, F., Douladiris, N., Cronin, C., Popescu, C. A., Pop, R. M., Bocsan, I. C., & Tsabouri, S. (2024). Nurturing Infants to Prevent Atopic Dermatitis and Food Allergies: A Longitudinal Study. Nutrients, 16(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16010021

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop