Next Article in Journal
Association between Dietary Patterns and All-Cause Mortality in the Chinese Old: Analysis of the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey Cohort
Next Article in Special Issue
Assessing the Hypertension Risk: A Deep Dive into Cereal Consumption and Cooking Methods—Insights from China
Previous Article in Journal
The Improvement and Related Mechanism of Microecologics on the Sports Performance and Post-Exercise Recovery of Athletes: A Narrative Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Beta-Glucan as a Soluble Dietary Fiber Source: Origins, Biosynthesis, Extraction, Purification, Structural Characteristics, Bioavailability, Biofunctional Attributes, Industrial Utilization, and Global Trade
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Consumer Perception of Innovative Fruit and Cereal Bars—Current and Future Perspectives

by
Małgorzata Kosicka-Gębska
*,
Marta Sajdakowska
,
Marzena Jeżewska-Zychowicz
,
Jerzy Gębski
and
Krystyna Gutkowska
Institute of Human Nutrition Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW-WULS), Nowoursynowska 159 C, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2024, 16(11), 1606; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16111606
Submission received: 18 April 2024 / Revised: 19 May 2024 / Accepted: 22 May 2024 / Published: 24 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cereal Grain Nutrition in Human Health)

Abstract

:
The aim of the study was to ascertain consumers’ interest in innovative fruit and cereal bars and their expectations of changes that could be applied by manufacturers to improve their health-promoting properties. An additional aim was to assess how these interests and expectations, as well as the information provided on the product label, determine the willingness to purchase a fruit and cereal bar with health-promoting properties. Data were collected through a quantitative CAWI survey conducted in 2020. It involved 1034 respondents. A logistic regression model was developed in which the dependent variable was the respondents’ interest in an innovative fruit and cereal bar on whose packaging the manufacturer declared its health-promoting properties. It was found that producers’ efforts to change the packaging to an organic one (OR = 1.24) along with enriching the product with chia seeds/flaxseed (OR = 1.22), vitamins and minerals (OR = 1.19), as well as fruit (OR = 1.14) and protein (OR = 1.12), or removing ingredients that cause allergies, would significantly increase the chance of respondents purchasing such a bar. A celebrity image and a claim that the product “helps maintain a healthy body weight” on the label would also encourage purchases. On the other hand, reducing the sugar content or enriching a fruit and cereal bar with powdered insects would significantly reduce the propensity to buy it.

1. Introduction

Fruit and cereal bars, like cereal bars, are products whose consumption has increased worldwide in recent years [1,2,3]. They are consumed by people on a diet, those involved in sports, people with health problems, or consumers looking to satisfy hunger and provide energy quickly [4,5]. The interest in such products is linked to changing lifestyles of consumers, who are increasingly interested in choosing foods that are convenient and yet functional. (Research shows that, in recent years, consumers have recognised the need to replace conventional snacks (e.g., chocolates, biscuits, and crisps) with fruit, dairy products, and various types of bars rich in health-beneficial ingredients [6].
Such bars may be a healthier and lower-calorie alternative to chocolate bars [7,8]. The enrichment of bars with nuts, fruits, and cereals promotes their acceptance due to their bioactive content [9,10,11]. Studies indicate that their consumption is also determined by respondents’ awareness of the fact that they provide more fibre [12,13]. Like sweets, these products improve mood. Therefore, consumers value them for their sweet taste, associated with safety and childhood [14].
Despite the above-mentioned positive characteristics, cereal and fruit and cereal bars, due to the fact that they belong to the category of sweets, cannot be considered products with unequivocally positive health effects [15]. Previous research confirms that excessive consumption of sweets contributes to a number of diseases, including emotional problems [16,17]. Research suggests that commercially available cereal bars are characterised by varying nutritional value [18,19]; among other things, they may be high in sugar and saturated fat [20]. From this perspective, these products are perceived as highly processed, with high amounts of additives, and thus as unnatural products [21]. And yet, consumers are increasingly concerned about their health, expecting the food they consume to be natural, health-promoting, and sustainable [22]. Such expectations are also held for fruit and cereal bars, prompting manufacturers to improve them [23]. Research is therefore needed to determine what innovations in cereal bars consumers may expect [7].
To date, research primarily related to cereal bars has focused on their production technology, with a particular focus on innovative additives [4,24]. There is little work investigating consumer acceptance of innovative fruit and cereal bars, or the changes expected by consumers that manufacturers could apply to such bars to improve their health-promoting properties. In response to these questions, a study was carried out to investigate (1) consumers’ interest in innovative fruit and cereal bars and (2) their expectations of changes that could be applied by manufacturers of fruit and cereal bars to improve their health-promoting properties, and then to evaluate how these interests and expectations, as well as the information provided on the product label, determine interest in purchasing an innovative fruit and cereal bar with health-promoting properties.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Approval

The Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Human Nutrition and Consumer Science, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW), appointed based on Regulation No. 27 of the SGGW Rector of 5 May 2016, approved the protocol of analysis of the behaviour of Polish consumers in the sweets market and of the determinants of consumer acceptance of innovative changes aimed at counteracting obesity, 25 June 2018, Resolution No. 30/2018, as consistent with the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was provided by participants.

2.2. Data Collection Process

A quantitative study of Polish consumers’ behaviour towards fruit and cereal bars was carried out in 2020 by a professional research agency, ARC Rynek i Opinia from Poland. Respondents were recruited from an online panel (ePanel) of 65,000 people. Due to the lack of national statistical data providing information on the level of consumption of cereal bars or fruit and cereal bars by Poles, respondents for the study were selected based on a purposive sampling method. No quotas were imposed on individual demographic variables (gender, age, education, place of residence). The study also collected basic demographic data on those who did not consume fruit and cereal bars. These subjects were excluded from the sample in the next research stage. Analysis of the data, including those consumers of this product category, did not reveal any significant deviations from the population profile of the Polish population in the selected demographic sets. After the survey questionnaire was developed by the authors of the article and a pilot study was conducted (35 completed questionnaires), the proper survey was carried out. Ultimately, 1034 adult respondents who consumed fruit and cereal bars and were 18 years of age or older participated in the study. A CAWI (computer-assisted web interview) method was used to collect data.

2.3. Questionnaire

The questionnaire used in the study covered issues relating to consumer behaviour towards fruit and cereal bars.
To assess the interest in purchasing an innovative fruit and cereal bar, respondents were asked to select one of the following statements: 1/I want to try it out and, if possible, I buy it immediately without thinking about it; 2/it arouses my interest, I think about whether I will buy it, gather information, compare it with others and finally buy it; 3/I accept every novelty with distrust, I think about it for a long time and I only buy it when my friends have done so and are satisfied with the purchase; 4/new/innovative products generally do not interest me, I do not buy untested things.
Additionally, the respondents’ interest in purchasing an innovative fruit and cereal bar, on the packaging of which the manufacturer declared its health-promoting properties, was assessed. Respondents expressed their interest in such a product by choosing one of two answers: yes—I am interested in buying or no—I am not interested in buying.
The knowledge of innovations in fruit and cereal bars was assessed in relation to the following actions: 1/change in product weight, 2/change in packaging appearance, 3/change in packaging size, 4/change in packaging to organic, 5/enrichment of the product with new ingredients, 6/reduction in the level of ingredients unfavourable to health, 7/improvement of packaging to improve the shelf life of the product, 8/introduction of a product with a new flavour, 9/change in product composition, 10/introduction of new ways of food preservation, 11/introduction of changes contributing to environmental protection, 12/the manufacturer proposing new uses for the product. Opinions concerning each measure were presented on a 5-point scale, with a score of 1 indicating “totally disagree”; 2, “disagree”; 3, “neither agree nor disagree”; 4, “agree”; and a score of 5 indicating “totally agree”.
Respondents’ expectations of changes that could be applied by manufacturers of fruit and cereal bars to improve their health-promoting properties included: 1/enrichment with essential fatty acids; 2/enrichment with vitamins and minerals; 3/reduction in fat content; 4/reduction in sugar content; 5/reduction in salt content; 6/reduction in cholesterol content; 7/enrichment with protein; 8/removal of allergy-inducing ingredients; 9/enrichment with fibre; 10/addition of insect powder; 11/addition of fruit; 12/addition of vegetables; 13/addition of chia seeds/flaxseed, insects; 14/addition of nuts. Respondents provided their opinions towards each expected modification on a 5-point scale: 1—“the modification matters very little to me” and 5—“the modification matters very much to me”. There was no neutral point on this scale. A 5-point ordinal scale was used, in which only the two extreme poles are described.
To determine respondents’ opinions on what information on the packaging/label of an innovative fruit and cereal bar with health-promoting properties could encourage consumers to buy it, the following information was taken into account: 1/contains no sugar, 2/contains only natural sugars derived from fruit, 3/increased fibre content, 4/helps maintain healthy body weight, 5/fibre helps digestion, 6/natural source of fibre, 7/a celebrity image on the packaging, 8/costs less, 9/more product for the same price. Respondents were given the opportunity to choose the following answers: yes, no, I have no opinion.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

As a preliminary analysis of the results obtained, a characterization of the variables was performed. Descriptive statistics were used for the quantitative variables and frequency analysis for the qualitative variables. Based on this, it was decided to create a logistic regression model, in which the dependent variable was the respondents’ interest in an innovative fruit and cereal bar on the packaging of which the manufacturer declared its health-promoting properties. Due to the qualitative nature of this characteristic, a logistic regression model with a dichotomous (binary) dependent variable was used. The terms: interest in purchasing an innovative fruit and cereal bar, familiarity with innovative fruit and cereal bars, expectations of changes that could be applied by fruit and cereal bar manufacturers to improve their health-promoting properties, and expectations of information provided on the packaging of an innovative fruit and cereal bar about health-promoting properties were used as independent (explanatory) variables. Only statistically significant explanatory variables were used in the model created.
The C-statistic value and the Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test were used to assess the quality of the resulting model. All analyses were performed using the SAS 9.4 statistical package (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) at a significance level of α = 0.05 [25,26].

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of the Survey Sample

The socio-demographic characteristics, including gender, age, place of residence, level of education, and subjective evaluation of financial situation, are presented in Table 1.
Approximately 70% of the respondents were women. More than half of the respondents were aged 25–39 years. The smallest number of respondents were over 55 years of age. Most of the respondents lived in a city. More than 50% of the respondents had a university education, and about 40% had a secondary education. More than half of the respondents could afford some, but not all, expenses. For about 15%, income was insufficient and allowed them to meet only basic needs.

3.2. Interest in Purchasing and Information on an Innovative Fruit and Cereal Bar with Health-Promoting Properties

More than half of the respondents (53.6%) declared that the innovative fruit and cereal bar arouses their interest, but that making a purchase decision requires thinking about it, gathering information, and comparing it with other products in the category.
Almost one in three respondents (35.4%) want to try it out and, if possible, buy without consideration. Only 7.0% of respondents embrace any novelty, including a fruit and cereal bar, with distrust, and, if they do make a purchase, it is only after their acquaintances have purchased the product and are satisfied with it. Around 4% of respondents declared that innovative products generally do not interest them and they do not buy untested products.
Among the changes made by producers to fruit and cereal bars, respondents perceived mainly changes to organic packaging, the use of new preservation methods, the enrichment of products with new ingredients, and the reduction in the level of ingredients unfavourable to health. In contrast, the least frequently perceived changes were changes to the product weight, packaging appearance, and size (Table 2).
Among the expected innovations in health-promoting fruit and cereal bars, the reduction in sugar content and the addition of fruit were indicated, in addition to the addition of vitamins and minerals, insect powder, and chia seeds/flaxseed. The least expected was the addition of nuts.
For more than four-fifths of the respondents, the image of a celebrity on the packaging/label of a fruit and cereal bar with health-promoting properties was an incentive to buy it. In addition, respondents indicated information such as “helps maintain healthy body weight”, “natural source of fibre”, and “more product for the same price”. By far the fewest people (23.1%) perceived the information “contains only natural sugars derived from fruit” as encouraging the purchase of the product (Table 3).

3.3. Determinants of Purchasing an Innovative Fruit and Cereal Bar with Health-Promoting Properties

Respondents declaring their willingness to try an innovative fruit and cereal bar and buying it without thinking about it were up to 25 times more likely to be interested in buying a fruit and cereal bar with health-promoting properties compared with the reference level, i.e., people who generally do not buy new, untested products (OR: 25.2, 95% CI: 8.82–71.9). In contrast, for those in whom an innovative bar arouses interest, but they consider whether to buy it, gather information, compare it with others, and only then buy it, the chance was more than 17 times higher relative to the reference level (OR: 17.4, 95% CI: 6.37–47.9). Those declaring that they accept any novelty with distrust, take longer to think about buying it, and only buy a product when their friends have already done so, showed an over 3.5 times greater chance of being interested in purchasing a fruit and cereal bar with health-promoting properties relative to the reference level (OR: 3.66, 95% CI: 1.21–11.0) (Table 4).
The more the respondents were convinced that the innovative actions of fruit and cereal bar manufacturers consisted of changing their packaging to eco-friendly and enriching the product with new ingredients, the more likely they were to purchase an innovative bar with health-promoting properties, increasing by 23% (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.03–1.48) and 34% (OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.06–1.69), respectively. In contrast, perceptions of changes as involving the introduction of new ways of preserving food (no preservatives, no colourings) decreased the chance of purchasing such a product by 26% for every one-point increase in this opinion (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.59–0.94); see Table 4.
Among the changes expected by respondents that increased the chances of purchasing a fruit and cereal bar with health-promoting properties were: 1/addition of flaxseed or chia seeds—an increase of 22% (OR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.10–1.42); 2/enrichment of the bar with vitamins and minerals—an increase of 19% (OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.10–1.42); 3/removal of allergy-inducing ingredients—an increase of 19% (OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.07–1.36); 4/addition of vegetables—an increase of 13% (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.09–1.24); 5/protein enrichment—an increase of 11% (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.04–1.31); see Table 4.
The expected changes in fruit and cereal bars that reduced the chances of purchasing such a health-promoting product were: 1/reduction in sugar content—6% decrease (OR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.79–0.98); 2/reduction in cholesterol content—11% decrease (OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.74–0.96); and 3/enrichment with insect powder—27% decrease (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.61–0.89); see Table 4.
The presence of a claim on the packaging/label of a health-promoting fruit and cereal bar indicating that the product “Helps maintain a healthy body weight” increased the chance of purchasing this product by 51% (OR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.06–2.45) compared with those who did not agree with this opinion. When an image of a celebrity was placed on the product packaging, the chance of purchasing an innovative fruit and cereal bar with health-promoting properties increased almost twofold in the group of people accepting it (OR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.02–3.40). Those who perceived the information “Natural source of fibre” on the packaging/label of the innovative bar as encouraging the purchase of the bar were 37% less likely to purchase a fruit and cereal bar with health-promoting properties compared with those opposed to this opinion (OR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.36–0.97) (Table 4). All assessed odds ratios (ORs) refer to when the other variables in the model remain constant.

4. Discussion

The study aimed to ascertain consumers’ interest in innovative fruit and cereal bars and their expectations of changes that could be applied by manufacturers to improve their health-promoting properties. In addition, the aim was to determine how these interests and expectations, as well as the information provided on the product label, determine the willingness to purchase a fruit and cereal bar with health-promoting properties.
Research suggests that commercially available cereal bars are characterised by varying nutritional value [12]; among other things, they may contain high levels of sugar and saturated fat [27]. The presence of such products on the market may cause them to be perceived as ultra-processed foods, with high amounts of additives, and thus as unnatural products [21]. A study of the German snack bar market found that although consumers categorised this product as highly processed, of 812 snack bars (protein, cereal, fruit, and nuts), 734 were bars that were not nutritionally poor and unnatural [28]. It is noted that their consumption is increasing worldwide [2,3]. As consumers become more health-conscious, cereal bars have gradually gone from a “standard” product to a “custom-made” product by integrating different functional ingredients [15,29]. The snack industry keeps investing to find more healthy innovative alternatives or substitutes to design bars [30].
The results of our survey confirmed that the willingness to purchase a fruit and cereal bar with health-promoting properties was mainly declared by those who showed general interest in fruit and cereal bars but were also characterised by innovation towards this type of product. Nevertheless, opinions regarding current and expected changes to these products and the nature of the information on their labels also determined the likelihood of interest in purchasing such bars. Opinions indicating the need for the addition of flaxseed or chia seeds, vitamins, minerals, and protein, and the removal of allergy-inducing ingredients, increased interest in purchasing fruit and cereal bars with health-promoting properties. In contrast, expectations of lowering the sugar and cholesterol content of these products, as well as the addition of powdered insects, were linked to a lower interest in purchasing such products.
The survey found that respondents expected future changes to fruit and cereal bars that would increase their health-promoting properties, including a reduction in sugar and added fruit, vitamins, and minerals, but also insect powder and chia seeds/flaxseed. The expectation of consumers to improve the health properties of fruit and cereal bars by reformulating the fruit and cereal bars already available on the market is confirmed by the actions of their manufacturers. They enrich of these products with whole grains; nuts [31]; seeds—flaxseed, quinoa, amaranth, chia [32]; vegetables—Welsh onion [33]; fruits—strawberry, raspberry, cranberry, jackfruit, dates, apple, banana peel [31,34]; legumes—lentil, beans, soybeans, Bambara groundnut [35]. Healthy ingredients rich in vitamins, minerals, amino acids, omega-3, and bioactive compounds are used to improve the nutritional value of the products and positively impact health [36,37]. As noted by [38], bioactive compounds of plant origin (polyphenols, antioxidants, bioactive peptides, and probiotics) are gaining consumer acceptance and may be health-promoting ingredients in cereal bars in the future.
A study by [39] confirmed that high levels of consumer acceptance could be gained for bars produced with the addition of flaxseed and quinoa, brown rice, nuts, and honey. The addition of vegetables and legumes as sources of fibre, minerals, antioxidants, and proteins rich in essential amino acids is also accepted [30]. Positive attitudes towards various additives that increase the nutritional value of a fruit and cereal bar were also declared by the respondents in our study, as they were positive about changes involving the addition of flaxseed and chia seeds, vitamins and minerals, but also about the addition of vegetables to fruit and cereal bars with health-promoting properties. Such changes, respondents declared, also prompted them to purchase innovative bars with health-promoting properties.
Our study showed that the consumers were interested in the addition of protein to the fruit and cereal bar, which also increased the chance of purchasing it. This result confirms one of the emerging market trends associated with cereal bars, which is protein fortification [30]. The increased interest in physical activity, including both endurance and strength sports, requires an increase in protein intake [33]. For this reason, protein cereal bars are gaining popularity, but also because of the importance of protein in weight and appetite control, satiety, and reducing daily food intake, especially among conscious consumers [40]. Currently, proteins from peas, lentils, lupins, algae [41], and insects [42,43,44] are used in the production of cereal bars in addition to traditional protein sources from soy or dairy products. The latter was also indicated by respondents as an expected change to the fruit and cereal bars, although the logistic regression shows that this type of innovation decreases the chance of purchasing such a product. Thus, it can be presumed that there is an acceptance of adding powdered insects to bars, but at the same time, consumers are quite sceptical about this type of action. Research confirms that the rejection of edible insects is due to the social and cultural norms that characterise different areas of the world [42]. In Poland, as in other European countries, cultural conditions may cause consumer aversion to this new food category [45,46,47]. In some regions of the world, which include primarily Latin America, Asia, and Africa, the consumption of edible insects is a common practice. This is related to the habit of consuming them, the tradition of consumption in the region, easy access, or low price [48]. On the one hand, edible insects are characterised by their favourable chemical composition and high nutritional value [49,50], but on the other hand, the susceptibility of fat extracted, for example, from the mealworm to rapid oxidation, may favour the formation of compounds with unpleasant taste and smell and thus reduce the acceptability of the products [51].
Less interest in purchasing a fruit and cereal bar with health-promoting properties was found when the sugar content of the product was reduced, even though such a modification was one of the most expected by respondents. These results indicate that although respondents declared that they expected such changes, they were not ready to purchase such products, perhaps because they still associate bars with a “sweet snack” and, as indicated by [52], this may be due to consumers being used to the sweet taste and not being willing to change their habits. It is noted that the snack industry, meeting the expectations of consumers as well as doctors and nutritionists, is looking for innovative alternatives to the sugar-reduced cereal bar. In addition, manufacturers are also aiming to reduce fat and sodium in these products [38] as well as gluten [12,39].
In contrast, according to respondents, the chance of purchasing an innovative fruit and cereal bar with health-promoting properties would be higher if reformulations were to reduce the content of unfavourable allergy-inducing ingredients. The use of gluten-free flour may be important due to the increasing number of patients with celiac disease [53]. Hence, the use of pseudo-cereals, e.g., grain amaranth, quinoa, buckwheat, chenopods, and chia seeds, is becoming more common [54].
The results of the study allow us to conclude that respondents show a high level of interest in innovative fruit and cereal bars, which may be related to the relatively high demand for functional foods among consumers [55].
Respondents who perceive that the bars are enriched with new ingredients are more likely to purchase an innovative bar with health-promoting properties. To create an innovative fruit and cereal bar, manufacturers are enriching them with new functional ingredients or lowering the level of ingredients that are unfavourable for health, which is confirmed by many studies [15,30]. The outcome of these efforts is the availability of many types of bars on the market. These include standard or fortified (e.g., fruits, pseudo-cereals, pulses, and insects); reduced in fat or sugar; gluten-containing or gluten-free; laminated or extruded; and single, multilayer, or sandwich format [56].
Furthermore, many studies confirm consumer interest in bars with cereals as the main ingredient [29,30]. They are consumed on the go, as meal replacements, and during exercise as products that are increasingly in consumers’ minds as positively influencing health and associated with natural foods [15,57]. The positive impact of consumed cereal bars on consumer health can be evidenced by the results of a study confirming that the addition of fibre-rich quinoa resulted in a reduction in total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides in young people eating cereal bars [37]. In addition, research shows that eating a cereal bar before noon instead of other snacks (e.g., crisps, sweets, biscuits, and cakes) can improve mental well-being, good mood, and memory (mental health) [58].
Respondents indicated that, currently, manufacturers of fruit and cereal bars increasing their innovativeness primarily focus on changing their packaging to eco-friendly. Further efforts by manufacturers in this area would be an important predictor in the decision to purchase an innovative fruit and cereal bar with health-promoting properties. Many cereal bar manufacturers are adopting plastic-free packaging and using renewable plant-based materials [30,59].
The results of our survey confirmed that consumers declare that they use the information provided on the packaging when deciding to purchase an innovative fruit and cereal bar. One of the functions of product packaging is to highlight those characteristics of the goods that are most desirable to the consumer. Hence, various forms of information about the product’s unique characteristics are used, e.g., nutrition and health claims and graphic symbols to accentuate product features that may be important to the purchaser [8,60]. Our study found that the willingness to purchase an innovative fruit and cereal bar with health-promoting properties would be higher if its packaging stated that it “helps to maintain a healthy body weight”. Normal body weight contributes to maintaining good health and feelings of being satisfied with life [61]. It is most often obtained through physical activity and proper nutrition [62]. It is noted that any action taken that promotes a healthy lifestyle, also related to the choice of health-promoting products, can reduce the risk of overweight and obesity and the development of related chronic diseases, such as diabetes [63].
According to the respondents, the chance of purchasing the product category under study would also be higher if an image of a celebrity was placed on the packaging. The commercial potential of the image of popular figures from the world of show business, politics, and sport has also been recognised by other researchers [64]. The sympathy and respect enjoyed by well-known and talented individuals cause consumers to attribute those characteristics to products associated with their idols. According to research, in recent years, food influencers, through social media, have proven to be very effective in endorsing health-promoting foods [65]. Information from them is perceived as more trustworthy and more reliable compared with other sources of information [66]. In addition, because of their relationship with their followers, these individuals can influence consumers’ opinions and purchase intentions [67].
As in the case of other food products [68,69], an incentive for consumers of fruit and cereal bars to purchase them can also be provided by information about their naturalness [70] and increased fibre content [36]. The results of our study, on the other hand, show that if manufacturers included information on the packaging of an innovative health-promoting fruit and cereal bar that it is a “natural source of fibre”, the chance of purchasing it would be 37% lower. Consideration could be given to including a statement on the packaging of health-promoting fruit and cereal bars that they are made from natural ingredients, that they are organic, or that they are free from ingredients that are not beneficial to health. This suggestion is based, among other things, on the results of a survey of US consumers, half of whom bought cereal bars on the packaging of which the following information was included: “made with natural ingredients”, “organic”, “free-from” [71].

5. Strength and Limitations

A strength of the study was a large group of people who declared that they consume fruit and cereal bars. Such a group allowed us to determine the current and projected preferences for an innovative fruit and cereal bar with health-promoting properties. This information can be used by manufacturers to prepare the bar in line with consumer expectations, which may result in a higher level of acceptance of this product when it appears on the market as well as fostering a more pro-healthy diet for different categories of consumers for whom snacking between meals is popular; it is better to use snacks with health-promoting qualities rather than salty or sugary ones.
Due to the lack of national statistics on the consumption of fruit and cereal bars, a limitation of the study was the non-random sampling. As a result of such selection, the group was dominated by women. In addition, a limitation of the study was that it was conducted only among Polish residents, although many of the results obtained are also confirmed by worldwide reports. There is a need to undertake further research detailing consumer preferences for a fruit and cereal bar with health-promoting properties in other countries.

6. Conclusions

In the context of the presented results of the quantitative survey on a nationwide research sample, it can be concluded that consumers are relatively innovative and interested in a snack in the form of a fruit and cereal bar with health-promoting properties. Nevertheless, it is important for manufacturers to introduce an addition to their composition or to reduce the content of certain ingredients that are unfavourable for health reasons, e.g., sugar.
It was found that manufacturers’ actions to enrich fruit and cereal bars with chia seeds or flaxseed, vitamins and minerals, as well as vegetables and protein, and to remove ingredients that cause allergies, would statistically significantly increase the chance of purchasing such bars. A celebrity image and a claim that the product “helps to maintain a healthy body weight” on the label would also increase the willingness to purchase it. On the other hand, reducing the sugar content or enriching a fruit and cereal bar with powdered insects would significantly reduce the propensity to buy it. It was also found that changing the packaging to biodegradable and therefore an environmentally friendly one would also increase interest in purchasing this type of product.
In addition to its cognitive value, the collected empirical material also has an important application aspect, indicating to producers the directions for reformulation of fruit and cereal bars and ways of communicating their health-promoting qualities.

Author Contributions

All authors made substantial contributions to the design of the study. M.K.-G., M.S., M.J.-Z. and K.G. were involved in the data acquisition and wrote the manuscript; J.G. analysed and contributed to the interpretation of the data. All authors were involved in critically revising the manuscript, and have given their approval to the manuscript submitted. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The publication was (co)financed by the science development fund of the Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Human Nutrition and Consumer Science, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW), appointed based on Regulation No. 27 of the SGGW Rector of 5 May 2016, approved the protocol of analysis of the behaviour of Polish consumers in the sweets market and of the determinants of consumer acceptance of innovative changes aimed at counteracting obesity, 25 June 2018, Resolution No. 30/2018, as consistent with the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was provided by participants.

Informed Consent Statement

The research agency conducting the quantitative survey received approval from consumers.

Data Availability Statement

The data is property of the Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders played no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. de Saint Pol, T.; Hébel, P. Practices and Representations of Snacking in a Highly Standardized Food Culture: The Scenario in France. Food Qual. Prefer. 2021, 93, 104245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Djupegot, I.L.; Hansen, S.; Lähteenmäki, L. What You Say and What You Do: Exploring the Link between Consumers’ Perception of Portion Size Norms and Reported Behaviour for Consumption of Sweets and Crisps. Food Qual. Prefer. 2021, 92, 104216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nordman, M.; Matthiessen, J.; Biltoft-Jensen, A.; Ritz, C.; Hjorth, M.F. Weekly Variation in Diet and Physical Activity among 4–75-Year-Old Danes. Public Health Nutr. 2020, 23, 1350–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zaveri, S.; Drummond, S. The Effect of Including a Conventional Snack (Cereal Bar) and a Nonconventional Snack (Almonds) on Hunger, Eating Frequency, Dietary Intake and Body Weight. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2009, 22, 461–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Singh, A.; Kumari, A.; Chauhan, A.K. Formulation and Evaluation of Novel Functional Snack Bar with Amaranth, Rolled Oat, and Unripened Banana Peel Powder. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 59, 3511–3521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. de Sousa, M.F.; Guimarães, R.M.; de Oliveira Araújo, M.; Barcelos, K.R.; Carneiro, N.S.; Lima, D.S.; Dos Santos, D.C.; de Aleluia Batista, K.; Fernandes, K.F.; Lima, M.C.P.M. Characterization of Corn (Zea mays L.) Bran as a New Food Ingredient for Snack Bars. LWT 2019, 101, 812–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Klerks, M.; Román, S.; Verkerk, R.; Sanchez-Siles, L. Are Cereal Bars Significantly Healthier and More Natural than Chocolate Bars? A Preliminary Assessment in the German Market. J. Funct. Foods 2022, 89, 104940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Brito, A.L.B.; Brito, L.R.; Honorato, F.A.; Pontes, M.J.C.; Pontes, L.F.B.L. Classification of Cereal Bars Using near Infrared Spectroscopy and Linear Discriminant Analysis. Food Res. Int. 2013, 51, 924–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bucher, T.; Collins, C.; Rollo, M.E.; McCaffrey, T.A.; De Vlieger, N.; Van der Bend, D.; Truby, H.; Perez-Cueto, F.J.A. Nudging Consumers towards Healthier Choices: A Systematic Review of Positional Influences on Food Choice. Br. J. Nutr. 2016, 115, 2252–2263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Huitink, M.; Poelman, M.P.; Seidell, J.C.; Pleus, M.; Hofkamp, T.; Kuin, C.; Dijkstra, S.C. Can Unhealthy Food Purchases at Checkout Counters Be Discouraged by Introducing Healthier Snacks? A Real-Life Experiment in Supermarkets in Deprived Urban Areas in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health 2020, 20, 542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Poquet, D.; Ginon, E.; Sénécal, C.; Chabanet, C.; Marette, S.; Issanchou, S.; Monnery-Patris, S. Effect of a Pleasure-Oriented Intervention on the Nutritional Quality of Midafternoon Snacks and on the Relationship between Food Liking and Perceived Healthiness within Mother-Child Dyads. Food Qual. Prefer. 2020, 84, 103947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Aleksejeva, S.; Siksna, I.; Rinkule, S. Composition of Cereal Bars. J. Health Sci. 2017, 5, 139–145. [Google Scholar]
  13. Curtain, F.; Grafenauer, S. Comprehensive Nutrition Review of Grain-Based Muesli Bars in Australia: An Audit of Supermarket Products. Foods 2019, 8, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Drewnowski, A.; Mennella, J.A.; Johnson, S.L.; Bellisle, F. Sweetness and Food Preference. J. Nutr. 2012, 142, 1142S–1148S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Pallavi, B.V.; Chetana, R.; Ravi, R.; Reddy, S.Y. Moisture Sorption Curves of Fruit and Nut Cereal Bar Prepared with Sugar and Sugar Substitutes. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 1663–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Koenders, P.G.; van Strien, T. Emotional Eating, Rather than Lifestyle Behavior, Drives Weight Gain in a Prospective Study in 1562 Employees. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2011, 53, 1287–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Elfhag, K.; Tholin, S.; Rasmussen, F. Consumption of Fruit, Vegetables, Sweets and Soft Drinks Are Associated with Psychological Dimensions of Eating Behaviour in Parents and Their 12-Year-Old Children. Public Health Nutr. 2008, 11, 914–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hawkes, C.; Jewell, J.; Allen, K. A Food Policy Package for Healthy Diets and the Prevention of Obesity and Diet-related Non-communicable Diseases: The NOURISHING Framework. Obes. Rev. 2013, 14, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Herforth, A.; Arimond, M.; Álvarez-Sánchez, C.; Coates, J.; Christianson, K.; Muehlhoff, E. A Global Review of Food-Based Dietary Guidelines. Adv. Nutr. 2019, 10, 590–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Deliza, R.; Lima, M.F.; Ares, G. Rethinking Sugar Reduction in Processed Foods. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2021, 40, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Perkovic, S.; Otterbring, T.; Schärli, C.; Pachur, T. The Perception of Food Products in Adolescents, Lay Adults, and Experts: A Psychometric Approach. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 2022, 28, 555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Stapleton, P.B.; Stewart, M. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Modalities of Group Delivery of Emotional Freedom Technique (EFT) Intervention for Food Cravings: Online versus in-Person. Open J. Soc. Sci. 2020, 8, 158–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kosicka-Gębska, M.; Jeżewska-Zychowicz, M.; Gębski, J.; Sajdakowska, M.; Niewiadomska, K.; Nicewicz, R. Consumer Motives for Choosing Fruit and Cereal Bars—Differences Due to Consumer Lifestyles, Attitudes toward the Product, and Expectations. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Dutcosky, S.D.; Grossmann, M.V.E.; Silva, R.S.S.F.; Welsch, A.K. Combined Sensory Optimization of a Prebiotic Cereal Product Using Multicomponent Mixture Experiments. Food Chem. 2006, 98, 630–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Field, A. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics; SAGE Publications Limited: New York, NY, USA, 2024; ISBN 1529668700. [Google Scholar]
  26. Marasinghe, M.G.; Koehler, K.J. Statistical Data Analysis Using SAS; Sage Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  27. Eating and Activity Guidelines. Available online: https://www.tewhatuora.govt.nz/health-services-and-programmes/nutrition/eating-and-activity-guidelines/ (accessed on 19 May 2024).
  28. Sanchez-Siles, L.; Roman, S.; Fogliano, V.; Siegrist, M. Naturalness and Healthiness in “Ultra-Processed Foods”: A Multidisciplinary Perspective and Case Study. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 129, 667–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pérez-Rodríguez, M.; Hidalgo, M.J.; Mendoza, A.; González, L.T.; Rodríguez, F.L.; Goicoechea, H.C.; Pellerano, R.G. Measuring Trace Element Fingerprinting for Cereal Bar Authentication Based on Type and Principal Ingredient. Food Chem. X 2023, 18, 100744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Boukid, F.; Klerks, M.; Pellegrini, N.; Fogliano, V.; Sanchez-Siles, L.; Roman, S.; Vittadini, E. Current and Emerging Trends in Cereal Snack Bars: Implications for New Product Development. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 73, 610–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Potter, R.; Stojceska, V.; Plunkett, A. The Use of Fruit Powders in Extruded Snacks Suitable for Children’s Diets. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 51, 537–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Khouryieh, H.; Aramouni, F. Effect of Flaxseed Flour Incorporation on the Physical Properties and Consumer Acceptability of Cereal Bars. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2013, 19, 549–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sung, Y.-Y.; Kim, S.-H.; Kim, D.-S.; Park, S.H.; Yoo, B.W.; Kim, H.K. Nutritional Composition and Anti-Obesity Effects of Cereal Bar Containing Allium Fistulosum (Welsh Onion) Extract. J. Funct. Foods 2014, 6, 428–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Carvalho, V.S.; Conti-Silva, A.C. Cereal Bars Produced with Banana Peel Flour: Evaluation of Acceptability and Sensory Profile. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 134–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ramírez-Jiménez, A.K.; Gaytán-Martínez, M.; Morales-Sánchez, E.; Loarca-Piña, G. Functional Properties and Sensory Value of Snack Bars Added with Common Bean Flour as a Source of Bioactive Compounds. LWT 2018, 89, 674–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fardet, A. New Hypotheses for the Health-Protective Mechanisms of Whole-Grain Cereals: What Is beyond Fibre? Nutr. Res. Rev. 2010, 23, 65–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Farinazzi-Machado, F.M.V.; Barbalho, S.M.; Oshiiwa, M.; Goulart, R.; Pessan Junior, O. Use of Cereal Bars with Quinoa (Chenopodium Quinoa W.) to Reduce Risk Factors Related to Cardiovascular Diseases. Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 32, 239–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Haș, I.M.; Vodnar, D.-C.; Bungau, A.F.; Tarce, A.G.; Tit, D.M.; Teleky, B.-E. Enhanced Elderberry Snack Bars: A Sensory, Nutritional, and Rheological Evaluation. Foods 2023, 12, 3544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kaur, R.; Ahluwalia, P.; Sachdev, P.A.; Kaur, A. Development of Gluten-Free Cereal Bar for Gluten Intolerant Population by Using Quinoa as Major Ingredient. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 3584–3591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shang, N.; Chaplot, S.; Wu, J. Food Proteins for Health and Nutrition. In Proteins in Food Processing; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 301–336. [Google Scholar]
  41. Souiy, Z.; Zakhama, N.; Cheraief, I.; Hammami, M. Nutritional, Physical, Microbial, and Sensory Characteristics of Gluten-and Sugar-Free Cereal Bar Enriched with Spirulina and Flavored with Neroli Essential Oil. LWT 2022, 169, 113955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ribeiro, J.C.; Santos, C.; Lima, R.C.; Pintado, M.E.; Cunha, L.M. Impact of Defatting and Drying Methods on the Overall Liking and Sensory Profile of a Cereal Bar Incorporating Edible Insect Species. Future Foods 2022, 6, 100190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Valesi, R.; Andreini, D.; Pedeliento, G. Insect-Based Food Consumption: Hedonic or Utilitarian Motives? Moderation and Segmentation Analyses. Food Qual. Prefer. 2024, 118, 105193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lange, K.W.; Nakamura, Y. Edible Insects as Future Food: Chances and Challenges. J. Future Foods 2021, 1, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bogusz, R.; Polak, R.; Nowacka, M. Consumer Attitudes to Food Products Made from Edible Insects. Zesz. Probl. Postępów Nauk Rol. 2020, 603, 17–27. [Google Scholar]
  46. Modlinska, K.; Adamczyk, D.; Maison, D.; Goncikowska, K.; Pisula, W. Relationship between Acceptance of Insects as an Alternative to Meat and Willingness to Consume Insect-Based Food—A Study on a Representative Sample of the Polish Population. Foods 2021, 10, 2420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Mancini, S.; Mattioli, S.; Paolucci, S.; Fratini, F.; Dal Bosco, A.; Tuccinardi, T.; Paci, G. Effect of Cooking Techniques on the in Vitro Protein Digestibility, Fatty Acid Profile, and Oxidative Status of Mealworms (Tenebrio molitor). Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 675572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Raheem, D.; Carrascosa, C.; Oluwole, O.B.; Nieuwland, M.; Saraiva, A.; Millán, R.; Raposo, A. Traditional Consumption of and Rearing Edible Insects in Africa, Asia and Europe. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 2169–2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kurek, M.A.; Onopiuk, A.; Pogorzelska-Nowicka, E.; Szpicer, A.; Zalewska, M.; Półtorak, A. Novel Protein Sources for Applications in Meat-Alternative Products—Insight and Challenges. Foods 2022, 11, 957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Ardoin, R.; Prinyawiwatkul, W. Product Appropriateness, Willingness to Try and Perceived Risks of Foods Containing Insect Protein Powder: A Survey of US Consumers. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 55, 3215–3226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Velasco, J.; Dobarganes, C.; Márquez-Ruiz, G. Variables Affecting Lipid Oxidation in Dried Microencapsulated Oils. Grasas Aceites 2003, 54, 304–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tang, C.S.; Mars, M.; James, J.; De Graaf, K.; Appleton, K.M. Sweet Talk: A Qualitative Study Exploring Attitudes towards Sugar, Sweeteners and Sweet-Tasting Foods in the United Kingdom. Foods 2021, 10, 1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Stantiall, S.E.; Serventi, L. Nutritional and Sensory Challenges of Gluten-Free Bakery Products: A Review. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 69, 427–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kaur, H.; Shams, R.; Dash, K.K.; Dar, A.H. A Comprehensive Review of Pseudo-Cereals: Nutritional Profile, Phytochemicals Constituents and Potential Health Promoting Benefits. Appl. Food Res. 2023, 3, 100351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Din, S.R.U.; Saeed, S.; Khan, S.U.; Kiani, F.A.; Alsuhaibani, A.M.; Zhong, M. Bioactive Compounds (BACs): A Novel Approach to Treat and Prevent Cardiovascular Diseases. Curr. Probl. Cardiol. 2023, 48, 101664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Padmashree, A.; Sharma, G.K.; Srihari, K.A.; Bawa, A.S. Development of Shelf Stable Protein Rich Composite Cereal Bar. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 49, 335–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Vasiljevic, M.; Pechey, R.; Marteau, T.M. Making Food Labels Social: The Impact of Colour of Nutritional Labels and Injunctive Norms on Perceptions and Choice of Snack Foods. Appetite 2015, 91, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Smith, A.P.; Wilds, A. Effects of Cereal Bars for Breakfast and Mid-Morning Snacks on Mood and Memory. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2009, 60, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kaźmierczak, M. Innowacyjne Opakowania Jako Inteligentne Rozwiązania Na Przykładzie Branży Spożywczej. Zesz. Nauk. Akad. Szt. Wojennej 2017, 2, 78–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Caso, G.; Blasi, E.; Cembalo, L.; Vecchio, R. This Cookie Will Save the Planet! The Effect of a Private Sustainability Claim on Consumers’ Expectations. Heliyon 2023, 9, e14206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Jensen, S.B.K.; Blond, M.B.; Sandsdal, R.M.; Olsen, L.M.; Juhl, C.R.; Lundgren, J.R.; Janus, C.; Stallknecht, B.M.; Holst, J.J.; Madsbad, S. Healthy Weight Loss Maintenance with Exercise, GLP-1 Receptor Agonist, or Both Combined Followed by One Year without Treatment: A Post-Treatment Analysis of a Randomised Placebo-Controlled Trial. eClinicalMedicine 2024, 69, 102475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Porca, C.; Rodriguez-Carnero, G.; Tejera, C.; Andujar, P.; Casanueva, F.F.; Crujeiras, A.B.; Bellido, D. Effectiveness to Promote Weight Loss Maintenance and Healthy Lifestyle Habits of a Group Educational Intervention Program in Adults with Obesity: IGOBE Program. Obes. Res. Clin. Pract. 2021, 15, 570–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Mulderij, L.S.; Hernández, J.I.; Mouter, N.; Verkooijen, K.T.; Wagemakers, A. Citizen Preferences Regarding the Public Funding of Projects Promoting a Healthy Body Weight among People with a Low Income. Soc. Sci. Med. 2021, 280, 114015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sicilia, M.; López, M.; Palazón, M. The Combined Effect of Front-of-Package Labels and Influencer Recommendations on Food Choice Decisions. Appetite 2023, 191, 107074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Folkvord, F.; de Bruijne, M. The Effect of the Promotion of Vegetables by a Social Influencer on Adolescents’ Subsequent Vegetable Intake: A Pilot Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Beuckels, E.; De Jans, S. ‘My Mom Got Influenced by Yours’: The Persuasiveness of Mom Influencers in Relation to Mothers’ Food Assessments and Decisions. Appetite 2022, 178, 106269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. De Jans, S.; Spielvogel, I.; Naderer, B.; Hudders, L. Digital Food Marketing to Children: How an Influencer’s Lifestyle Can Stimulate Healthy Food Choices among Children. Appetite 2021, 162, 105182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Battacchi, D.; Verkerk, R.; Pellegrini, N.; Fogliano, V.; Steenbekkers, B. The State of the Art of Food Ingredients’ Naturalness Evaluation: A Review of Proposed Approaches and Their Relation with Consumer Trends. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 106, 434–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Rozin, P.; Fischler, C.; Shields-Argelès, C. European and American Perspectives on the Meaning of Natural. Appetite 2012, 59, 448–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Roman, S.; Sánchez-Siles, L.M.; Siegrist, M. The Importance of Food Naturalness for Consumers: Results of a Systematic Review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 67, 44–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Grace Garwood IRI: Global Snacking Trends to Watch. Available online: https://foodinstitute.com/focus/iri-global-snacking-trends-to-watch/ (accessed on 6 April 2024).
Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of the study sample.
Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of the study sample.
Variables Total Sample
N%
Total Sample 1034100.0
GenderWoman71669.3
Man31830.7
Age18–24 years14514.0
25–39 years55653.8
40–54 years28327.4
55–65 years504.8
Place of residenceRural18517.9
City up to 100,000 inhabitants37736.5
City with more than 100,000 inhabitants47245.6
EducationPrimary education161.6
Basic vocational767.4
Secondary41139.7
Higher53151.3
Opinion on incomeIs not sufficient at all262.5
Allows us to meet only basic needs12712.3
We can afford some, but not all, expenses57255.3
We can afford everything22722.0
We can afford everything, plus we can save827.9
Table 2. Respondents’ opinions on changes made and expected changes to fruit and cereal bars.
Table 2. Respondents’ opinions on changes made and expected changes to fruit and cereal bars.
StatementsMean ValueStandard DeviationModal Value
Current innovative efforts undertaken by fruit and cereal bar manufacturers *
Changing to organic packaging3.921.154
Introducing new ways of preserving food3.861.104
Enriching the product with new ingredients3.801.054
Reducing levels of components that are detrimental to health3.781.094
Changing the product composition3.691.054
Implementing changes to protect the environment3.641.123
Introducing a product with a new flavour3.361.173
Improving packaging to improve product shelf life3.321.133
Suggesting new uses for the product3.241.173
Changing the appearance of the packaging2.941.193
Changing the size of the packaging2.911.193
Changing the product weight2.781.213
Innovative changes expected by consumers in a health-promoting fruit and cereal bar **
Reduction in sugar content4.071.085
Addition of fruit4.050.965
Enrichment with vitamins and minerals3.961.015
Addition of powdered insect powder3.961.045
Addition of chia seeds/flaxseed3.921.055
Reduction in cholesterol3.901.105
Enrichment with protein3.891.105
Removal of ingredients causing allergies3.881.095
Enrichment with fibre3.721.093
Reduction in salt content3.711.114
Reduction in fat content3.631.243
Addition of vegetables3.621.163
Enrichment with essential fatty acids3.521.113
Addition of nuts3.181.163
* Scale: 1 indicating “totally disagree”, 3 indicating “neutral”, and a score of 5 indicating “totally agree”. ** Scale: 1, “the modification matters very little to me” and 5, “the modification matters very much to me”.
Table 3. Information on the packaging of a fruit and cereal bar encouraging purchase as perceived by respondents (%).
Table 3. Information on the packaging of a fruit and cereal bar encouraging purchase as perceived by respondents (%).
Information on the PackagingInformation as an Incentive to Purchase
YesNoI Have No Opinion
It does not contain sugar62.120.917.0
It contains only natural sugars derived from fruit23.158.018.9
Increased fibre content67.916.016.1
It helps maintain a healthy body weight75.412.312.3
Fibre helps digestion65.918.215.9
Natural source of fibre71.714.813.5
Showing an image of a celebrity on the packaging80.78.510.8
Costs less63.020.616.4
More product for the same price70.216.313.5
Table 4. Statistically significant variables and their estimation properties used to build the logistic regression model.
Table 4. Statistically significant variables and their estimation properties used to build the logistic regression model.
Variable EstimatePoint EstimatePr > ChiSq
Consumer interest in an innovative fruit and cereal bar appearing in shops −3.089 (−2.478) 0.0003 (0.0286)
I want to try it out and if it’s possible, I buy it right away without a second thought3.227 (3.166)25.201 (23.716)<0.0001 (<0.0001)
It arouses my interest, I wonder if I will buy it, I collect information, I compare it with others and finally, I buy it.2.861 (2.803)17.478 (16.489)<0.0001 (<0.0001)
I accept any novelty with distrust, think long and only buy when my friends have already done so and are happy with their purchase1.298 (1.248)3.660 (3.485)0.0214 (0.0282)
New products generally do not interest me, I do not buy untested things01
Current innovative efforts undertaken by producers of a fruit and cereal bar with health-promoting propertiesChanging the packaging to eco-friendly0.214 (0.208)1.238 (1.231)0.0207 (0.0266)
Enriching the product with new ingredients0.294 (0.304)1.341 (1.355)0.0145 (0.0126)
Implementing new ways of preserving food−0.291 (−0.296)0.747 (0.744)0.0127 (0.0125)
Innovative changes expected by consumers in a health-promoting fruit and cereal barEnriching the product with vitamins and minerals0.176 (0.153)1.192 (1.165)0.0398 (0.0412)
Reducing sugar content−0.061 (−0.038)0.941 (0.963)0.0493 (0.0573)
Reducing cholesterol−0.116 (−0.121)0.891 (0.886)0.0319 (0.4179)
Enriching the product with protein0.112 (0.104)1.119 (1.110)0.0173 (0.0221)
Removing allergy-inducing ingredients0.175 (0.167)1.191 (1.182)0.0125 (0.0188)
Addition of powdered insects−0.304 (−0.320)0.738 (0.726)0.0020 (0.0014)
Addition of fruit0.130 (0.076)1.138 (1.079)0.0255 (0.0429)
Addition of chia seeds/flaxseed0.202 (0.228)1.224 (1.256)0.0152 (0.0076)
Information on the packaging/label “Helps maintain a healthy body weight”I have no opinion0.091 (0.067)1.095 (1.069)0.7789 (0.8394)
Yes0.415 (0.395)1.515 (1.485)0.0399 (0.0311)
No01
Information on packaging/label “Natural source of fibre”I have no opinion−0.112 (−0.068)0.894 (0.935)0.7740 (0.8640)
Yes−0.450 (−0.417)0.637 (0.659)0.0446 (0.0462)
No01
Showing an image of a celebrity on the packaging/labelI have no opinion0.007 (0.004)1.007 (1.004)0.9805 (0.9887)
Yes0.624 (0.641)1.866 (1.899)0.0418 (0.0386)
No01
The correctness of the prediction of the model created was confirmed by the statistics C = 0.838 and Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test (p = 0.8474) for model crude (unadjusted) and C = 0.840 and Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test (p = 0.3706) for model adjusted used to assess it.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kosicka-Gębska, M.; Sajdakowska, M.; Jeżewska-Zychowicz, M.; Gębski, J.; Gutkowska, K. Consumer Perception of Innovative Fruit and Cereal Bars—Current and Future Perspectives. Nutrients 2024, 16, 1606. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16111606

AMA Style

Kosicka-Gębska M, Sajdakowska M, Jeżewska-Zychowicz M, Gębski J, Gutkowska K. Consumer Perception of Innovative Fruit and Cereal Bars—Current and Future Perspectives. Nutrients. 2024; 16(11):1606. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16111606

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kosicka-Gębska, Małgorzata, Marta Sajdakowska, Marzena Jeżewska-Zychowicz, Jerzy Gębski, and Krystyna Gutkowska. 2024. "Consumer Perception of Innovative Fruit and Cereal Bars—Current and Future Perspectives" Nutrients 16, no. 11: 1606. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16111606

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop