Next Article in Journal
Post Natal Microbial and Metabolite Transmission: The Path from Mother to Infant
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring the Influence of Acid-Base Status on Athletic Performance during Simulated Three-Day 400 m Race
Previous Article in Special Issue
Acute and Repeated Ashwagandha Supplementation Improves Markers of Cognitive Function and Mood
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 16
Issue 13
10.3390/nu16131988
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Modulation of Gut Microbiome and Autism Symptoms of ASD Children Supplemented with Biological Response Modifier: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study

by
Jela Hrnciarova
1,2,
Klara Kubelkova
3,*,
Vanda Bostik
3,
Ivan Rychlik
4,
Daniela Karasova
4,
Vladimir Babak
4,
Magdalena Datkova
1,2,
Katerina Simackova
1,2 and
Ales Macela
3
1
Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 500 03 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
2
Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital in Hradec Kralove, 500 03 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
3
Military Faculty of Medicine, University of Defence, 500 03 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
4
Veterinary Research Institute, 621 00 Brno, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2024, 16(13), 1988; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16131988
Submission received: 12 May 2024 / Revised: 18 June 2024 / Accepted: 19 June 2024 / Published: 21 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Effect of Nutrients on Neurological Disorders)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The etiology and mechanisms of autism and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are not yet fully understood. There is currently no treatment for ASD for providing significant improvement in core symptoms. Recent studies suggest, however, that ASD is associated with gut dysbiosis, indicating that modulation of gut microbiota in children with ASD may thus reduce the manifestation of ASD symptoms. The aim of this pilot study (prospective randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled) was to evaluate efficacy of the biological response modifier Juvenil in modulating the microbiome of children with ASD and, in particular, whether Juvenil is able to alleviate the symptoms of ASD. In total, 20 children with ASD and 12 neurotypical children were included in our study. Supplementation of ASD children lasted for three months. To confirm Juvenil’s impact on the gut microbiome, stool samples were collected from all children and the microbiome’s composition was analyzed. This pilot study demonstrated that the gut microbiome of ASD children differed significantly from that of healthy controls and was converted by Juvenil supplementation toward a more neurotypical microbiome that positively modulated children’s autism symptoms.

1. Introduction

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a behaviorally defined neurodevelopmental disorder. ASD lacks specific clinical biomarkers and has seen an evolving conceptualization through the decades since it was first described. Over the past four decades, there has been dramatic increase in the number of individuals diagnosed with ASD [1]. In general, ASD is diagnosed by 3 years of age in most of those children experiencing it, although roughly 40% of such children are not first evaluated until 4 years of age [2]. A psychiatric diagnosis of ASD, which has behavior as its basis of definition, relies heavily upon precise observation and clinical expertise because the condition lacks standardized biomarkers [3].
ASD is one of the most common and challenging neurodevelopmental disorders in children. Its prevalence rate worldwide now exceeds 1%. A small number of these children appear to develop normally in their first year and then go through a period of regression between 18 and 24 months of age. ASD is characterized by deficits in communication and social interaction, as well as a presence of repetitive and restrictive behaviors. Moreover, ASD often manifests with a wide range of comorbidities that include morphological, physiological, and psychiatric conditions. ASD’s most commonly proposed causes are physiological and metabolic disorders involving immunity, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction [4]. Co-occurrence of two or more disorders in the same individual has been observed, with comorbidities including anxiety, depression, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD), epilepsy, gastrointestinal symptoms/problems, sleep disorders, learning disabilities, obsessive–compulsive disorder, intellectual disability, sensory problems, and immune disorders. The most prevalent comorbidity, at roughly 50%, is intellectual disability [5]. At least one comorbidity exists in about 70% of children with ASD, while 41% have two or more [6]. An estimated 20% of individuals diagnosed with ASD also have epilepsy [7].
Although ASD’s etiology remains largely unexplained, a recent finding identifies specific gut microbiota composition in ASD patients. Post-mortem examination of ASD subjects’ brain tissue and small intestines has revealed that the blood–brain barrier and gut barrier were disrupted, with significant neuroinflammation evidenced by increased expression of genes and markers associated with brain inflammation. It has further been inferred that the gut–brain axis disruption may be associated with non-self antigens that trigger a neuroinflammatory reaction by crossing the damaged gut barriers, thus leading to ASD in genetically susceptible subjects [8]. In a study involving 192 twins, however, genetic factors accounted for only 38% of ASD risk, whereas the remaining 68% was attributed to environmental factors [9]. A significant role was ascribed to the gut microbiota [10]. Microbiota is shaped by diet, lifestyle, and microbial exposure in the early developmental phase and infection, as well as by genetic makeup, metabolites, and immunological and hormonal aspects [11].
Analysis of gut microbiota is currently a growing area of research linked to neuropsychological disorders, including depression [12], metabolic disorders such as obesity [13], and gastrointestinal disorders, including inflammatory bowel disease or irritable bowel syndrome [14,15]. Many studies have identified that microbiota composition in ASD patients differs significantly from that in healthy controls [16,17,18,19]. Nutritional intervention, prebiotics, probiotics, and symbiotics, including fecal microbiota transplantation as a remedy to modulate the species composition of the intestinal microbiota of patients with ASD, already have been tested [20,21,22,23,24]. These studies generally have concluded, however, that their findings should be taken with caution because there still exist only limited data from studies examining different regimens of different remedy applications and there have not yet been double-blind studies demonstrating clinical significance of the effects of those remedies used. Here, therefore, we present the results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled study utilizing the biological response modifier Juvenil for influencing the gut microbiota of children suffering from ASD and for modulating their ASD symptoms.

2. Study Design, Materials, and Methods

2.1. Study Design

The pilot prospective double-blind randomized feasibility study enrolled 28 children (9 girls and 19 boys) of Czech nationality aged 3 to 7 years. Of these, 16 children under care of the Psychiatric Clinic of the Hradec Kralove University Hospital, Czech Republic met the criteria for a diagnosis of ASD and the remaining 12 children (control group) were neurotypical (NT), i.e., without any signs of ASD (Table 1). The ASD children were randomly selected for the study by their attending psychiatrists. The children forming the control (neurotypical) group were randomly included in the study on the basis of an agreement with parents living in the geographical area of this study. These children were never under the care of a psychiatrist.
The group of autistic children was randomly divided into two groups of 8 children each. The first group was administered Juvenil, while the second group of 8 autistic children was given a placebo throughout the study. Juvenil or placebo capsules were administered orally to the children by their parents at home once a day for 3 months. The inclusion of children with autism into the study did not affect their existing treatments, education, or rehabilitation. To evaluate the effect of Juvenil on the gut microbiome, stool samples were collected once from healthy children and from autistic children before and after providing Juvenil or placebo. Autistic children were evaluated using the Childhood Autism Rating Scale in its standard version (CARS2-ST) by a clinical psychiatrist and subjective information based on observations of the children’s behavior was obtained by conducting interviews with the children’s parents. The study was approved by the hospital’s ethics committee and informed consent was signed by the parents of all study participants (see Figure 1).

2.2. Juvenil and Placebo

The Juvenil and placebo capsules were prepared by Uniregen, Ltd., Nachod, Czech Republic. Capsules of Juvenil contained 1.0 mg of Juvenil crude substance while placebo capsules contained redistilled water. Both capsule types looked identical and were stored at room temperature until use.
Juvenil is a nontoxic alcohol–ether extract of bovine tissue registered as a dietary supplement with modulatory activity on the immunity, dominantly on cells of the innate immune system, and on the organism’s regeneration [25,26]. Juvenil is a complex mixture of peptides, nucleotides, free amino acids, and some other components of animal origin [27].

2.3. Stool Samples Procedure

The following recommendations were given to parents concerning fecal sample collection: (1) sample a stool from a clean container (e.g., potty) or from a piece of stool on toilet paper; (2) the stool must not be diluted with water or urine; (3) collect the stool sample using the scoop placed in the lid of the collection container; (4) a small amount of stool is sufficient for the examination (i.e., not larger than the size of a hazelnut or 1–2 mL in the case of a liquid stool sample); (5) return the sampling scoop to the container and screw on the cap; (6) place the collection container in a plastic bag, close the bag, and label it with the child’s name and surname, not marking the sample container in any other way; (7) place the container with the stool sample in a closed plastic bag and keep it at 4 °C (in the refrigerator); (8) personally deliver the collection container with the sample to the doctor no later than 24 h after taking the sample (preferably the same day, but no later than the following day); and (9) stool samples should be collected one day before the start of supplementation and on the last day of supplementation (i.e., after 12 weeks from the start of supplementation).
The collection container and its contents were labeled by the attending physician and the samples were stored at −20 °C until subsequent examination.

2.4. Microbiota Analysis

Microbiota composition was determined as described previously [28]. The samples were homogenized in a MagNALyzer (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Following homogenization, the DNA was extracted using a QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and the DNA concentration was determined spectrophotometrically. DNA samples were diluted to 5 ng/mL and were used as template in polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with forward primer 5′-TCGTCGGCAGCGTCAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAG-MID-GTCCTACGGGNGGC WGCAG-3′ and reverse primer 5′-GTCTCGTGGGCTCGGAGATGTGTATAAGAGACA G-MIDGTGACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′. MIDs shown above represent different sequences 5, 6, 7, or 9 base pairs in length that were used to identify individual samples within the sequencing groups. PCR amplification was performed using a HotStarTaq Plus Master Mix kit (Qiagen) and the resulting PCR products were purified using AMPure beads (Beckman Coulter, Prague, Czech Republic). In the next steps, the concentration of PCR products was determined spectrophotometrically, the DNA was diluted to 100 ng/µL, and groups of 14 PCR products with different MID sequences were indexed with the same indices using a Nextera XT Index Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Prior to sequencing, the concentrations of differently indexed samples were determined using a KAPA Library Quantification Complete kit (Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, MA, USA), all indexed samples were diluted to 4 ng/µL, and 20 pM phiX DNA was added to final concentration of 5% (v/v). Sequencing was performed using a MiSeq Reagent Kit v3 and MiSeq apparatus (Illumina).
Sequencing data were analyzed using QIIME 2 [29]. Raw sequence data were demultiplexed and quality filtered; sequencing primers were then clipped using Je [30] and Fastp [31]. The resulting sequences were denoised with DADA2 [32]. Taxonomy was assigned to ASVs using the q2-feature-classifier [33] classify-sklearn naïve Bayes taxonomy classifier against the Silva 138 [34]. All the software tools were used with default settings.

2.5. Statistical Methods

Microbiota composition in different groups of patients was compared using permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA, R project, package vegan, function adonis2; Bray–Curtis dissimilarity, 9999 permutations). If PERMANOVA rejected the null hypothesis, then pairwise comparisons were made of all groups. Statistical significance was established at p < 0.05. LEfSe (linear discriminant analysis effect size) was used to determine taxa which most likely explained the differences between the compared groups [35]. To correlate the individual categories of ASD patient symptoms with bacterial taxa that may characterize the gut dysbiosis of children with ASD, the Covariance S tool in Microsoft Excel 2021 (v16.0) was used.

3. Results

3.1. Gut Microbiota Composition in Autistic and Neurotypical Children

Comparison of beta diversity using principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) confirmed differences in the clustering of samples from control and ASD children (Figure 2). All groups of ASD patients (NT, ASD Placebo, and ASD before and after Juvenil treatment) harbored microbiota different from those of the NT group (p = 0.001). At the bacterial phylum level, there were significant differences in the abundance of Actinobacteriota, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria. While Actinobacteriota and Proteobacteria dominated in autistic children, Firmicutes were more abundant in neurotypical controls (Table 2 and Table S1).
LEfSe analysis (linear discriminant analysis effect size) identified bacterial taxa discriminating the ASD groups prior to supplementation from the NT group (Figure 3). Bifidobacterium longum, Ruminococcus torque, Faecalibacterium, Flavonifractor, Pseudomonadas, and Clostridia vadinBB60 were characteristic for the gut microbiota of autistic children while Streptococcus parasanguinis, Monoglobus, Terrisporobacter, or Bacteroides cellulosilyticus were more abundant in the microbiota of healthy controls.

3.2. Gut Microbiome Modulation by Juvenil

Pairwise comparison of NT, ASD patients before treatment, and ASD patients after Juvenil supplementation demonstrated there to be a significant difference in the microbiota composition between the NT and ASD patients before supplementation, but there was no significant difference in microbiota composition in a comparison of ASD patients after Juvenil either with NT healthy controls or with ASD patients before treatment. Juvenil administration thus shifted the profile of the gut microbiota composition of autistic children toward that of the neurotypical children, although it did not result in the restoration of a completely healthy type of microbiota. In addition, there were no significant differences in microbiota composition at the phylum level when comparing ASD patients either before and after placebo treatment or before and after Juvenil administration (Table 3).
A moderate effect of Juvenil administration in comparison to placebo can be seen also from the comparison of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) completely lost or newly acquired during treatment (Table S2). The greatest losses or acquisition were recorded in OTUs belonging to families Lachnospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae, Oscilospiraceae, and Christenellaceae, all comprising spore-forming bacterial species. While children after placebo treatment lost 305 OTUs and newly acquired 132 OTUs, microbiota in Juvenil-treated ASD patients were more stable as there were only 200 OTUs lost and 152 newly appearing (Table S2).

3.3. Behavioral Status of Autistic Children and Juvenil

The behavioral status of autistic children of both groups was assessed using CARS2-ST at the time of entry into the study and after completion of supplementation. A comparison of the group supplemented with Juvenil and the group supplemented with placebo showed a positive shift in the values of the rating scale parameters during 3-month supplementation with Juvenil (Table 4 and Table S3). Nevertheless, the changes associated with Juvenil as well as placebo supplementation did not reach statistical significance (ASD placebo group p = 0.62, ASD Juvenil group p = 0.19). There were also no significant differences in the effect of supplementation in children with mild symptoms of ASD and severe symptoms of ASD in either group (Juvenil group p = 0.95, placebo group p = 0.82). Numerically, however, using the percentile parameter, there was a 12.4% reduction in autism symptoms associated with Juvenil supplementation, which was approximately double that associated with the placebo (6.6% reduction). In comparing the difference between Juvenil supplementation versus placebo using the T-score parameter, we can observe shifts of two or more points in favor of Juvenil for categories 4 (motor manifestations), 7 (visual reactions), 10 (fear and nervousness), 12 (nonverbal communication), and 13 (activity level). In addition, Juvenil showed a significant positive effect (p = 0.009) when comparing the index of individual CARS-2 ST categories modulation by Juvenil and placebo, respectively (Table 4).

3.4. Correlation between Abundance of Key Bacterial Genera and ASD Symptoms

To further explore whether specific microbiota composition can be associated with ASD symptoms, the abundance of 22 genera reported by other authors as associated with ASD symptoms were compared with results from CARS2-ST testing using a covariance S test (Figure 4). Prevotella, Escherichia/Shigella, Veillonella, Streptococcus, Alistipes, and Bifidobacterium had the highest positive correlation coefficients in relation to the total CARS2-ST score (i.e., the greater the abundance of these genera, the more severe were the autism symptoms). On the other hand, a negative correlation was observed for Bacteroides, Faecalibacterium, Barnesiella, and Blautia (Figure 4A), indicating that an increase in the abundance of these genera was associated with relief in autistic symptoms. Of the five tested CARS2-ST categories, the nonverbal communication category was characterized by a positive correlation with Blautia (Figure 4E). For all categories tested, including the total score, Veillonella, Streptococcus, and Clostridium repeatedly exhibited a positive correlation.

4. Discussion

The gut microbiota is a complex ecosystem that, through its metabolites or enteroendocrine cell products induced by those metabolites, affects the microbiota–gut–brain axis and thus homeostasis of the entire organism. Consistent with previously published studies [36,37,38,39,40,41], a different composition of gut microbiota was recorded for children with ASD compared to unrelated neurotypical controls. The significant changes in representation were demonstrated in the phyla Actinobacteriota, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria. LEfSe analysis revealed an increased abundance of Bifidobacterium longum, Ruminococcus torques group, Faecalibacterium, Flavonifractor, and several taxa of Clostiridiae and Pseudomonodaceae as characteristic for the gut microbiota of autistic children. On the other hand, autistic children were characterized also by lower abundance of taxa from the Prevotellaceae, Peptostreptococcaceae, and Monoglobaceae families. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (F. prausnitzii) is one of the main producers of butyrate in the intestine and, because butyrate is an inhibitor of NF-κB and IFN-γ [42], F. prausnitzii may interfere with the body’s inflammatory responses. Moreover, F. prausnitzii is an of IL-10 inducer and may, therefore, be referred to as an anti-inflammatory gut bacterium [43]. Aside from Faecalibacterium, the remaining positively scored bacterial taxa (e.g., Ruminococcus, Flavonifractor, and Bifidobacterium species have been suggested as predictors of more adverse post-traumatic neuropsychiatric sequelae outcomes [44]. Flavonifractor prevalence has also been associated with another psychiatric diagnosis of affective disorder [45]. On the other hand, the bacterial taxa with decreased abundance in the gut microbiota of autistic children (e.g., Prevotella) have high genetic diversity and, therefore, it is difficult to predict their functional relationships to autism [46,47]. Whether Prevotella is or is not beneficial to health depends on many factors [48], so it cannot be used unambiguously as a predictive factor of gut dysbiosis in autism [49]. A lower abundance of the families Monoglobaceae and Peptostreptococcaceae in the gut microbiome has been associated with maternal prenatal stress or anxiety symptoms [50,51].
In this pilot study, the genuses Bacteroides and Prevotella were found to have the highest negative and positive correlation coefficients, respectively, in relation to total CAR2-ST score. Bacteroides and Prevotella, two quite closely related genera, were frequently associated with extreme opposite autism symptoms (Figure 4). Interestingly, Prevotella is usually enriched in African ethnics with a high proportion of plants in their food (enterotype 2) while Bacteroides enrichment is associated with a Western diet (enterotype 1) [52,53]. Another interesting observation for Prevotella and Bacteroides is that Bacteroides dominates the gut microbiota of piglets or humans under lactation and is replaced within a short time after weaning by the related Prevotella [54,55,56]. This may point to the importance of weaning, diet, and associated changes in the gut microbiota for the development of autism in children. In this respect, moreover, the mother’s diet during pregnancy and lactation, especially from the viewpoint of consuming a Western diet with an unbalanced ratio of polyunsaturated fatty acids, may adversely affect brain development [57,58].
Microbiota transfer therapy or probiotic supplementation of ASD individuals has been tested as means to alleviate ASD symptoms by modulation of gut microbiota [59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66]. Microbiota transfer therapy treatment protocol, consisting of the application of vancomycin, the laxative MoviPrep, SHGM (Standardized Human Gut Microbiota), and Prilosec (Omeprazole), reduced the rates of core ASD symptoms [5,64]. The administration of probiotics, either alone or in combination with other biologically active substances such as colostrum or oxytocin, led to minor reductions in autism symptoms but without reaching statistical significance [62,63,67]. Only a study that was based on the application of four probiotic bacteria in combination with fructooligosaccharides provided a significant reduction in the severity of autism and gastrointestinal symptoms [65]. Although our results are in agreement with these studies, in that a biologically active substance may alleviate ASD symptoms, whether this is a direct immunostimulating effect or rather is caused by modification of the gut microbiota composition, remains uncertain.
Data from this pilot study presented here demonstrate significant changes in the microbiome, and in parallel, the effects on some categories of CARS2-ST. However, these results must be approached with caution, as children in home care were included in this study, and confounding variables such as diet in the family, passive smoking, the influence of complementary medicines used by children, or the physical and psychological family environment could have impacted microbiota profiles.

5. Conclusions

This pilot study confirms, albeit in a small number of children, that children with ASD have altered composition of the gut microbiota. A high abundance of Bacteroides was associated with weaker ASD symptoms while Prevotella, Escherichia/Shigella, Veillonella, Streptococcus, Alistipes, and Bifidobacterium were enriched in the gut microbiota of autistic children with strongest symptoms. An altered composition of ASD children’s gut microbiota was shifted toward a neurotypical profile by Juvenil supplementation. Juvenil also positively modulated children’s autism symptoms, namely in the categories of motor manifestations, visual reactions, fear and nervousness, nonverbal communication, and activity level. Juvenil supplementation of ASD children was safe, well-tolerated, and had no side effects.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu16131988/s1, Table S1: All basic data on the composition of gut microbiota of children with ASD and neurotypical children expressed in percentages; Table S2: Number of lost or acquired OTUs within individual bacterial families before and after supplementation of ASD children; Table S3: The results of behavioral status of autistic children of both groups assessed by the CARS2-ST at the time of entry into the study and after completion of supplementation. For the purposes of this study, Juvenil was designated as the moon and placebo as the sun..

Author Contributions

J.H.; participated in conceptualization, decisions on methodology, and writing of the original draft, K.K.; participated in conceptualization, decisions on methodology, investigation, and writing of the original draft, V.B. (Vanda Bostik); writing—review and editing, I.R.; participated in decisions on methodology, formal analysis, validation, and writing of the original draft, D.K.; participated in microbiome analysis, V.B. (Vladimir Babak); participated in microbiome analysis, M.D.; Methodology, Validation, K.S.; Methodology, Validation, A.M.; participated in conceptualization, decisions on methodology, investigation, data curation, supervision, and writing of the original draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Ministry of Defence of the Czech Republic—long-term organization development plan Medical Aspects of Weapons of Mass Destruction of the Faculty of Military Health Sciences, University of Defence (DZRO-FVZ-ZHN-II).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board and Ethics Commission of the University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic, No.: 202005 S09P, on 12 May 2020.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

All data are available within the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Juvenil Products, a.s. Prezletice, Czech Republic for providing extract from bovine tissue for our experiments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. There are, therefore, no financial or material benefits for author/co-authors. The purchase of extract were conducted by the standard way.

Abbreviations

ASD autism spectrum disorder
ADHD attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder
CARS2-ST Childhood Autism Rating Scale in its standard version
DNA deoxyribonucleic acid
F. prausnitziiFaecalibacterium prausnitzii
IFN-γtype II interferon
LEfSelinear discriminant analysis effect size
NF-κBnuclear factor Kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B-cells
NT neurotypical
OTU operational taxonomic units
PCoA principal component analysis
IL-10 interleukin 10

References

  1. Elsabbagh, M.; Divan, G.; Koh, Y.J.; Kim, Y.S.; Kauchali, S.; Marcin, C.; Montiel-Nava, C.; Patel, V.; Paula, C.S.; Wang, C.; et al. Global prevalence of autism and other pervasive developmental disorders. Autism Res. 2012, 5, 160–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Baio, J.; Wiggins, L.; Christensen, D.L.; Maenner, M.J.; Daniels, J.; Warren, Z.; Kurzius-Spencer, M.; Zahorodny, W.; Rosenberg, C.R.; White, T. Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years-Autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2014. MMWR Surveill. Summ. 2018, 67, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Venigalla, H.; Mekala, H.M.; Hassan, M.; Ahmed, R.; Zain, H.; Dar, S.; Veliz, S. An update on biomarkers in psychiatric disorders–are we aware use in our clinical practice. Ment. Health Fam. Med. 2017, 13, 471–479. [Google Scholar]
  4. Styles, M.; Alsharshani, D.; Samara, M.; Alsharshani, M.; Khattab, A.; Walid, M.; Al-Dewik, N.I. Risk factors, diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of autism. Front. Biosci. 2020, 25, 1682–1717. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kang, D.W.; Adams, J.B.; Gregory, A.C.; Borody, T.; Chittick, L.; Fasano, A.; Khoruts, A.; Geis, E.; Maldonado, J.; McDonough-Means, S. Microbiota Transfer Therapy alters gut ecosystem and improves gastrointestinal and autism symptoms: An open-label study. Microbiome 2017, 5, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mannion, A.; Leader, G. Comorbidity in autism spectrum disorder: A literature review. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 2013, 7, 1595–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Doshi-Velez, F.; Ge, Y.; Kohane, I. Comorbidity clusters in autism spectrum disorders: An electronic health record time-series analysis. Pediatrics 2014, 133, e54–e63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fiorentino, M.; Sapone, A.; Senger, S.; Camhi, S.S.; Kadzielski, S.M.; Buie, T.M.; Kelly, D.L.; Cascella, N.; Fasano, A. Blood–brain barrier and intestinal epithelial barrier alterations in autism spectrum disorders. Mol. Autism. 2016, 7, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Hallmayer, J.; Cleveland, S.; Torres, A.; Phillips, J.; Cohen, B.; Torigoe, T.; Miller, J.; Fedele, A.; Collins, J.; Smith, K. Genetic heritability and shared environmental factors among twin pairs with autism. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2011, 68, 1095–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ogunrinola, G.A.; Oyewale, J.O.; Oshamika, O.O.; Olasehinde, G.I. The Human Microbiome and Its Impacts on Health. Int. J. Microbiol. 2020, 2020, 8045646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhu, S.; Jiang, Y.; Xu, K.; Cui, M.; Ye, W.; Zhao, G.; Jin, L.; Chen, X. The progress of gut microbiome research related to brain disorders. J. Neuroinflamm. 2020, 17, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, L.; Wang, H.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Xie, P. Gut microbiota and its metabolites in depression: From pathogenesis to treatment. EBioMedicine 2023, 90, 104527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Asadi, A.; Shadab, M.N.; Mohamadi, M.H.; Shokri, F.; Heidary, M.; Sadeghifard, N.; Khoshnood, S. Obesity and gut-microbiota-brain axis: A narrative review. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2022, 36, e24420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Quaglio, A.E.V.; Grillo, T.G.; De Oliveira, E.C.S.; Di Stasi, L.C.; Sassaki, L.Y. Gut microbiota, inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer. World J. Gastroenterol. 2022, 28, 4053–4060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Canakis, A.; Haroon, M.; Weber, H.C. Irritable bowel syndrome and gut microbiota. Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Obes. 2020, 27, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Louis, P. Does the human gut microbiota contribute to the etiology of autism spectrum disorders? Dig. Dis. Sci. 2012, 57, 1987–1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sivamaruthi, B.S.; Suganthy, N.; Kesika, P.; Chaiyasut, C. The Role of Microbiome, Dietary Supplements, and Probiotics in Autism Spectrum Disorder. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Saurman, V.; Margolis, K.G.; Luna, R.A. Autism Spectrum Disorder as a Brain-Gut-Microbiome Axis Disorder. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2020, 65, 818–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Alamoudi, M.U.; Hosie, S.; Shindler, A.E.; Wood, J.L.; Franks, A.E.; Hill-Yardin, E.L. Comparing the Gut Microbiome in Autism and Preclinical Models: A Systematic Review. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 905841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ristori, M.V.; Quagliariello, A.; Reddel, S.; Ianiro, G.; Vicari, S.; Gasbarrini, A.; Putignani, L. Autism, Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Modulation of Gut Microbiota by Nutritional Interventions. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Martínez-González, A.E.; Andreo-Martínez, P. Prebiotics, probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation in autism: A systematic review. Rev. Psiquiatr. Salud Ment. 2020, 13, 150–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ansari, F.; Pourjafar, H.; Tabrizi, A.; Homayouni, A. The Effects of Probiotics and Prebiotics on Mental Disorders: A Review on Depression, Anxiety, Alzheimer, and Autism Spectrum Disorders. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2020, 21, 555–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Tan, Q.; Orsso, C.E.; Deehan, E.C.; Kung, J.Y.; Tun, H.M.; Wine, E.; Madsen, K.L.; Zwaigenbaum, L.; Haqq, A.M. Probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of behavioral symptoms of autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review. Autism Res. 2021, 14, 1820–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Taniya, M.A.; Chung, H.J.; Al Mamun, A.; Alam, S.; Aziz, M.A.; Emon, N.U.; Islam, M.M.; Hong, S.S.; Podder, B.R. Role of Gut Microbiome in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Its Therapeutic Regulation. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 915701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kubelkova, K.; Macela, A. A short history of Imuregne—An original tissue extract. MMSL 2019, 88, 115–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bostik, V.; Kubelková, K.; Macela, A. Juvenil, a natural immune booster affecting biological responses through modulation of gut microbiota composition. MMSL, 2023; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kubelkova, K.; Hubalek, M.; Rehulka, P.; Rehulkova, H.; Friedecky, D.; Zakova, J.; Macela, A. Molecular characterization of alcohol/ether extract from bovine tissue. MMSL 2021, 90, 120–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kubelkova, K.; Rychlik, I.; Crhanova, M.; Karasova, D.; Slizova, D.; Zakova, J.; Luksikova, L.; Macela, A. Gut microbiota alterations by nutritional supplement Imuregen. MMSL 2020, 89, 114–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bolyen, E.; Rideout, J.R.; Dillon, M.R.; Bokulich, N.A.; Abnet, C.C.; Al-Ghalith, G.A.; Alexander, H.; Alm, E.J.; Arumugam, M.; Asnicar, F.; et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 852–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Girardot, C.; Scholtalbers, J.; Sauer, S.; Su, S.Y.; Furlong, E.E. Je, a versatile suite to handle multiplexed NGS libraries with unique molecular identifiers. BMC Bioinform. 2016, 17, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, S.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, Y.; Gu, J. An ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, i884–i890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Callahan, B.J.; McMurdie, P.J.; Rosen, M.J.; Han, A.W.; Johnson, A.J.; Holmes, S.P. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 581–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bokulich, N.A.; Kaehler, B.D.; Rideout, J.R.; Dillon, M.; Bolyen, E.; Knight, R.; Huttley, G.A.; Gregory Caporaso, J. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome 2018, 6, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Quast, C.; Pruesse, E.; Yilmaz, P.; Gerken, J.; Schweer, T.; Yarza, P.; Peplies, J.; Glockner, F.O. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, D590–D596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Segata, N.; Izard, J.; Waldron, L.; Gevers, D.; Miropolsky, L.; Garrett, W.S.; Huttenhower, C. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 2011, 12, R60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Williams, B.L.; Hornig, M.; Parekh, T.; Lipkin, W.I. Application of novel PCR-based methods for detection, quantification, and phylogenetic characterization of Sutterella species in intestinal biopsy samples from children with autism and gastrointestinal disturbances. MBio 2012, 3, e00261-11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Song, Y.L.; Liu, C.X.; Finegold, S.A. Real-time PCR quantitation of Clostridia in feces of autistic children. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 6459–6465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. De Angelis, M.; Piccolo, M.; Vannini, L.; Siragusa, S.; De Giacomo, A.; Serrazzanetti, D.I.; Cristofori, F.; Guerzoni, M.E.; Gobbetti, M.; Francavilla, R. Fecal microbiota and metabolome of children with autism and pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Wang, L.; Christophersen, C.T.; Sorich, M.J.; Gerber, J.P.; Angley, M.T.; Conlon, M.A. Increased abundance of Sutterella spp. and Ruminococcus torques in feces of children with autism spectrum disorder. Mol. Autism. 2013, 4, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tomova, A.; Husarova, V.; Lakatosova, S.; Bakos, J.; Vlkova, B.; Babinska, K.; Ostatnikova, D. Gastrointestinal microbiota in children with autism in Slovakia. Physiol. Behav. 2015, 138, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yuan, J.; Zhu, L.; Liu, X.; Li, T.; Zhang, Y.; Ying, T.; Wang, B.; Wang, J.; Dong, H.; Feng, E. A Proteome Reference Map and Proteomic Analysis of Bifidobacterium longum NCC2705. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2006, 5, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sokol, H.; Pigneur, B.; Watterlot, L.; Lakhdari, O.; Bermúdez-Humarán, L.G.; Gratadoux, J.J.; Blugeon, S.; Bridonneau, C.; Furet, J.P.; Corthier, G. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is an anti-inflammatory commensal bacterium identified by gut microbiota analysis of Cron disease patients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 16731–16736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Rossi, O.; van Berkel, L.A.; Chain, F.; Tanweer Khan, M.; Taverne, N.; Sokol, H.; Duncan, S.H.; Flint, H.J.; Harmsen, H.J.; Langella, P. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii A2-165 has a high capacity to induce IL-10 in human and murine dendritic cells and modulates T cell responses. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 18507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zeamer, A.L.; Salive, M.C.; An, X.; Beaudoin, F.L.; House, S.L.; Stevens, J.S.; Zeng, D.; Neylan, T.C.; Clifford, G.D.; Linnstaedt, S.D. Association between microbiome and the development of adverse posttraumatic neuropsychiatric sequelae after traumatic stress exposure. Transl. Psychiatry 2023, 13, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Coello, K.; Hansen, T.H.; Sørensen, N.; Ottesen, N.M.; Miskowiak, K.W.; Pedersen, O.; Kessing, L.V.; Vinberg, M. Affective disorders impact prevalence of Flavonifractor and abundance of Christensenellaceae in gut microbiota. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2021, 110, 110300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Vinod, K.; Narendrakumar, M.; Suchismitha, I.; Chitra, D. Divergences in gene repertoire among the reference Prevotella genomes derived from distinct human body sites. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 153. [Google Scholar]
  47. Ley, R.E. Gut microbiota in 2015: Prevotella in the gut: Choose carefully. Nature Reviews. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016, 13, 69–70. [Google Scholar]
  48. Tett, A.; Pasolli, E.; Masetti, G.; Ercolini, D.; Segata, N. Prevotella diversity, niches and interactions with the human host. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 19, 585–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Agarwala, S.; Naik, B.; Ramachandra, N.B. Mucosa-associated specific bacterial species disrupt the intestinal epithelial barrier in the autism phenome. Brain Behav. Immun. Health 2021, 15, 100269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Abdelsalam, N.A.; Hegazy, S.M.; Aziz, R.K. The curious case of Prevotella copri. Gut Microbes 2023, 15, 2249152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chang, C.J.; Lin, T.L.; Tsai, Y.L.; Wu, T.R.; Lai, W.F.; Lu, C.C.; Lai, H.C. Next generation probiotics in disease amelioration. J. Food Drug Anal. 2019, 27, 615–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tremaroli, V.; Bäckhed, F. Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism. Nature 2012, 489, 242–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. García-Montero, C.; Fraile-Martínez, O.; Gómez-Lahoz, A.M.; Pekarek, L.; Castellanos, A.J.; Noguerales-Fraguas, F.; Coca, S.; Guijarro, L.G.; García-Honduvilla, N.; Asúnsolo, A. Nutritional Components in Western Diet Versus Mediterranean Diet at the Gut Microbiota-Immune System Interplay. Implications for Health and Disease. Nutrients 2021, 13, 699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Khine, W.W.T.; Rahayu, E.S.; See, T.Y.; Kuah, S.; Salminen, S.; Nakayama, J.; Lee, Y.K. Indonesian children fecal microbiome from birth until weaning was different from microbiomes of their mothers. Gut Microbes 2020, 12, 1761240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kubasova, T.; Davidova-Gerzova, L.; Babak, V.; Cejkova, D.; Montagne, L.; Le-Floc’h, N.; Rychlik, I. Effects of host genetics and environmental conditions on fecal microbiota composition of pigs. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0201901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Karasova, D.; Crhanova, M.; Babak, V.; Jerabek, M.; Brzobohaty, L.; Matesova, Z.; Rychlik, I. Development of piglet gut microbiota at the time of weaning influences development of postweaning diarrhea—A field study. Res. Vet. Sci. 2021, 135, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Simopoulos, A.P. Importance of the Omega-6/Omega-3 Balance in Health and Disease: Evolutionary Aspects of Diet, Healthy Agriculture, Healthy Nutrition, Healthy People; Karger Publishers: Basel, Switzerland, 2011; pp. 10–21. [Google Scholar]
  58. Yau, S.Y.; Yip, Y.S.L.; Formolo, D.A.; He, S.; Lee, T.H.Y.; Wen, C.; Hryciw, D.H. Chronic consumption of a high linoleic acid diet during pregnancy, lactation and post-weaning period increases depression-like behavior in male, but not female offspring. Behav. Brain Res. 2022, 416, 113538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Liu, Y.W.; Liong, M.T.; Chung, Y.E.; Huang, H.Y.; Peng, W.S.; Cheng, Y.F.; Lin, Y.S.; Wu, Y.Y.; Tsai, Y.C. Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum PS128 on Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder in Taiwan: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Nutrients 2019, 11, 820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Critchfield, J.W.; van Hemert, S.; Ash, M.; Mulder, L.; Ashwood, P. The potential role of probiotics in the management of childhood autism spectrum disorders. Gastroenterol. Res. Pract. 2011, 2011, 161358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Santocchi, E.; Guiducci, L.; Fulceri, F.; Billeci, L.; Buzzigoli, E.; Apicella, F.; Calderoni, S.; Grossi, E.; Morales, M.A.; Muratori, F. Gut to brain interaction in Autism Spectrum Disorders: A randomized controlled trial on the role of probiotics on clinical, biochemical and neurophysiological parameters. BMC Psychiatry 2016, 16, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Arnold, L.E.; Luna, R.A.; Williams, K.; Chan, J.; Parker, R.A.; Wu, Q.; Hollway, J.A.; Jeffs, A.; Lu, F.; Coury, D.L.; et al. Probiotics for Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Quality of Life in Autism: A Placebo-Controlled Pilot Trial. J. Child Adolesc. Psychopharmacol. 2019, 29, 659–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sanctuary, M.R.; Kain, J.N.; Chen, S.Y.; Kalanetra, K.; Lemay, D.G.; Rose, D.R.; Yang, H.T.; Tancredi, D.J.; German, J.B.; Slupsky, C.M. Pilot study of probiotic/colostrum supplementation on gut function in children with autism and gastrointestinal symptoms. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0210064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kang, D.W.; Adams, J.B.; Coleman, D.M.; Pollard, E.L.; Maldonado, J.; McDonough-Means, S.; Caporaso, J.G.; Krajmalnik-Brown, R. Long-term benefit of Microbiota Transfer Therapy on autism symptoms and gut microbiota. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Wang, Y.; Li, N.; Yang, J.J.; Zhao, D.M.; Chen, B.; Zhang, G.Q.; Chen, S.; Cao, R.F.; Yu, H.; Zhao, C.Y.; et al. Probiotics and fructo-oligosaccharide intervention modulate the microbiota-gut brain axis to improve autism spectrum reducing also the hyper-serotonergic state and the dopamine metabolism disorder. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 157, 104784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Sarkar, A.; Lehto, S.M.; Harty, S.; Dinan, T.G.; Cryan, J.F.; Burnet, P.W.J. Psychobiotics and the Manipulation of Bacteria-Gut-Brain Signals. Trends Neurosci. 2016, 39, 763–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kong, X.J.; Liu, J.; Liu, K.; Koh, M.; Sherman, H.; Liu, S.; Tian, R.; Sukijthamapan, P.; Wang, J.; Fong, M. Probiotic and Oxytocin Combination Therapy in Patients with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Trial. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nutrients 16 01988 g001
Figure 1. Flow diagram of the participant progress from recruitment to the end of the experiment. Include exclusions/dropouts.
Figure 1. Flow diagram of the participant progress from recruitment to the end of the experiment. Include exclusions/dropouts.
Nutrients 16 01988 g001
Nutrients 16 01988 g002
Figure 2. Fecal microbiota analysis of ASD and control children. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) using Bray–Curtis distance matrix separated samples of control and ASD children. Blue dots indicate samples from neurotypical control children; yellow dots indicate samples from ASD children.
Figure 2. Fecal microbiota analysis of ASD and control children. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) using Bray–Curtis distance matrix separated samples of control and ASD children. Blue dots indicate samples from neurotypical control children; yellow dots indicate samples from ASD children.
Nutrients 16 01988 g002
Nutrients 16 01988 g003
Figure 3. Taxa characteristic for ASD and control children. LEfSe analysis identified bacterial taxa in stool samples typical for ASD (green) and neurotypical control children (red).
Figure 3. Taxa characteristic for ASD and control children. LEfSe analysis identified bacterial taxa in stool samples typical for ASD (green) and neurotypical control children (red).
Nutrients 16 01988 g003
Nutrients 16 01988 g004
Figure 4. Comparison of microbiome data with total scores of CARS2-ST and its individual categories in which the total score shifted by at least two points after Juvenil supplementation. (A)—total score, (B)—body, (C)—visual response, (D)—fear and nervousness, (E)—nonverbal communication, (F)—activity level. ** only Ruminococcus torques group and/or Ruminococcus gauvreauii_group.
Figure 4. Comparison of microbiome data with total scores of CARS2-ST and its individual categories in which the total score shifted by at least two points after Juvenil supplementation. (A)—total score, (B)—body, (C)—visual response, (D)—fear and nervousness, (E)—nonverbal communication, (F)—activity level. ** only Ruminococcus torques group and/or Ruminococcus gauvreauii_group.
Nutrients 16 01988 g004
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the subjects involved in this study.
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the subjects involved in this study.
CharacteristicValue
ASD GroupNeurotypical Group
Average age at enrollment (years)6 ± 3 *5 ± 2 *
Age range (years)3–93–9
Male/Female, (number)13/38/4
Ethnicity/LocationWhite/East Bohemia, CZEWhite/East Bohemia, CZE
Note: * mean ± SD.
Table 2. Relative abundance of gut microbiota between ASD group (without any treatment) and neurotypical control group (NT) at phylum levels.
Table 2. Relative abundance of gut microbiota between ASD group (without any treatment) and neurotypical control group (NT) at phylum levels.
PhylumASDNTp-Value
Actinobacteriota3.041.180.03
Bacteroidota49.0249.480.60
Campylobacterota0.0300.35
Cyanobacteria0.090.120.92
Desulfobacterota0.290.170.39
Euryarchaeota0.0060.210.03
Firmicutes41460.004
Fusobacteriota0.0010.0030.17
Patescibacteria0.020.0020.08
Proteobacteria620.01
Synergistota0.00500.28
Verrucomicrobiota0.840.690.80
Table 3. Comparison of microbiota composition (%) at the phylum level before and after Juvenil or placebo treatment.
Table 3. Comparison of microbiota composition (%) at the phylum level before and after Juvenil or placebo treatment.
PhylumJuvenilPlacebo
BeforeAfterp-ValueBeforeAfterp-Value
Actinobacteriota3.782.250.262.782.540.84
Bacteroidota51.0558.620.5750.8357.220.53
Campylobacterota0.070.060.910.000600.32
Cyanobacteria0.070.060.830.050.110.36
Desulfobacterota0.290.130.480.330.360.79
Euryarcheota0.0050.020.370.010.020.54
Firmicutes36.3734.050.6041.8334.290.12
Fusobacteriota0.000800.320.000900.32
Patescibacteria0.0060.0060.950.020.010.44
Proteobacteria6.974.110.223.484.380.59
Synergistota0.0050.0020.560.00700.32
Verrucomicrobiota1.280.610.480.661.070.51
Table 4. Comparison of individual CARS2-ST * categories in Juvenil- and placebo-supplemented groups. Data were collected before and after 3-months supplementation. Before and after numbers are sums of the CARS2-ST category values from all members of the given group (Juvenil, placebo).
Table 4. Comparison of individual CARS2-ST * categories in Juvenil- and placebo-supplemented groups. Data were collected before and after 3-months supplementation. Before and after numbers are sums of the CARS2-ST category values from all members of the given group (Juvenil, placebo).
Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS2-ST)Σ JuvenilΣ PlaceboShiftIndexIndex
CategoryBeforeAfterBeforeAfterJuvenil/PlaceboJuvenilPlacebo
1Relationship to people26.524.521.519.52/20.9160.921
2Imitation23.021.517.516.01.5/1.50.9280.933
3Emotional response21.519.522.522.02/0.50.9021
4Body21.019.020.020.02/00.9001
5Object use20.519.015.515.01/0.50.9211
6Adaptation to change19.518.521.519.51/20.9440.916
7Visual response19.517.518.518.52/00.8921
8Listening response22.021.017.517.51/011
9Taste–smell–touch response and use18.018.018.017.00/111
10Fear and nervousness20.017.020.019.53/0.50.8230.972
11Verbal communication26.526.524.523.00/1.510.952
12Nonverbal communication24.022.516.518.01.5/−1.50.9301
13Activity level24.022.021.521.52/00.9041
14Level and consistency of intellectual response21.521.524.524.50/011
15General impressions25.024.524.024.00.5/00.9781
t-test p = 0.0095
Note: * Eric Schopler, Mary E. Van Bourgondien, Glenna Janette Wellman, Steven R. Love. (CARS™2) Childhood Autism Rating Scale™, Second Edition (https://www.wpspublish.com/cars-2-childhood-autism-rating-scale-second-edition.html, accessed on 12 May 2020).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hrnciarova, J.; Kubelkova, K.; Bostik, V.; Rychlik, I.; Karasova, D.; Babak, V.; Datkova, M.; Simackova, K.; Macela, A. Modulation of Gut Microbiome and Autism Symptoms of ASD Children Supplemented with Biological Response Modifier: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study. Nutrients 2024, 16, 1988. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16131988

AMA Style

Hrnciarova J, Kubelkova K, Bostik V, Rychlik I, Karasova D, Babak V, Datkova M, Simackova K, Macela A. Modulation of Gut Microbiome and Autism Symptoms of ASD Children Supplemented with Biological Response Modifier: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study. Nutrients. 2024; 16(13):1988. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16131988

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hrnciarova, Jela, Klara Kubelkova, Vanda Bostik, Ivan Rychlik, Daniela Karasova, Vladimir Babak, Magdalena Datkova, Katerina Simackova, and Ales Macela. 2024. "Modulation of Gut Microbiome and Autism Symptoms of ASD Children Supplemented with Biological Response Modifier: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study" Nutrients 16, no. 13: 1988. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16131988

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop