Next Article in Journal
The Efficacy of Probiotics, Prebiotics, Synbiotics, and Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Content Validity of the Saudi Sign Language Version of the General Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire
Previous Article in Journal
Supplementation with Highly Standardized Cranberry Extract Phytosome Achieved the Modulation of Urinary Tract Infection Episodes in Diabetic Postmenopausal Women Taking SGLT-2 Inhibitors: A RCT Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 16
Issue 13
10.3390/nu16132112
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Typical Guidelines for Well-Balanced Diet and Science Communication in Japan and Worldwide

by
Naohisa Shobako
1,*,
Hiroshi Itoh
2 and
Keiko Honda
3
1
Division of Food Science and Biotechnology, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Uji 611-0011, Kyoto, Japan
2
The Center for Preventive Medicine, Keio University, Minato-ku, Tokyo 106-0041, Japan
3
Laboratory of Medicine Nutrition, Kagawa Nutrition University, Sakado-City 350-0214, Saitama, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2024, 16(13), 2112; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16132112
Submission received: 3 June 2024 / Revised: 27 June 2024 / Accepted: 30 June 2024 / Published: 2 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Impact of Nutritional Education and Food Policy on Consumers)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Numerous studies have investigated healthy diets and nutrients. Governments and scientists have communicated their findings to the public in an easy-to-understand manner, which has played a critical role in achieving citizens’ well-being. Some countries have published dietary reference intakes (DRIs), whereas some academic organizations have provided scientific evidence on dietary methods, such as traditional diets. Recently, more user-friendly methods have been introduced; the Health Star Rating system and Optimized Nutri-Dense Meals are examples from Australia and Japan, respectively. Both organizations adopt a novel approach that incorporates nudges. This review summarizes the science communication regarding food policies, guidelines, and novel methods in Japan and other countries. In the food policies section, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the DRIs and food-based guidelines published by the government. Dietary methods widely known, such as The Mediterranean diet, Nordic diet, Japanese traditional diet, and the EAT-Lancet guidelines, were also reviewed. Finally, we discussed future methods of science communications, such as nudge.

1. Introduction

The remarkable progress of nutrition science has contributed to the considerable information on diets and ingredients that contribute to improved health. For more than 1000 years, since Hippocrates said, “Let food be thy medicine and medicine be thy food,” vitamins and other nutrients have been identified. Over the next 100 years, continued discoveries across a wide range of nutritional sciences, including molecular nutrition and epidemiology, led to the development of functional foods that might prevent several diseases. To transfer these findings, food policy and science communication play a critical role. Both the government and some academic societies have taken the initiative. For example, in Japan, the government has published two sets of dietary guidelines [1,2], and the Japan Atherosclerosis Society has also published The Japan Diet guidelines [3]. Science communication through guidelines is also active in developed countries, such as the U.S. and those in Europe. However, the high prevalence of lifestyle-related diseases remains a significant issue in these countries [4], including Japan [5,6]. Malnutrition is also becoming a major concern in Japan. Iizuka reported an excessive desire to be thin, to achieve a so-called “Cinderella weight” in Japan [7]. The infodemic is exacerbating this issue; social media influencers have been shown to significantly impact eating behavior and body image [8]. The Health and Nutrition Survey results reflect this phenomenon [9], introducing some shocking findings. Although many adults consume more than 8 g of salt daily, the most common response was, “I will not change my eating habits while having an interest.” The survey also highlights the lack of reduction in the prevalence of obesity and diabetes.
The purpose of this study was to review science communication to date, including guidelines, and to discuss what is needed to improve science communication.

2. Methods

We collected the dietary reference intakes (DRIs) and food-based guidelines from public agency websites. First, we reviewed guidelines from Japan, which represents the Asia region and has the longest life expectancy [10]. We also selected guidelines from countries we determined to be distinctive in North America, the Middle East, Europe, and Oceania. Additionally, we also searched for food-based guidelines whose effects were determined by human clinical trials. Finally, we reviewed two examples with novel approaches to science communication from recent articles.

3. Dietary Reference Intake

3.1. Overview

The government publishes a DRI for its citizens, which specifies the recommended daily amounts of nutrient consumption determined using several specialized indicators. The estimated average requirement (EAR) is the daily requirement that is estimated to be met by 50% of people in each segment. The recommended dietary allowance (RDA) is the amount of intake estimated to meet the daily needs of most individuals in each segment. For example, most of the RDAs were calculated using EAR + 2 standard deviations in the Japanese DRI [1]. Adequate intake (AI) is the quantity sufficient to maintain a good nutritional status for people in each segment when adequate scientific evidence is unavailable to calculate the EAR or RDA. The upper limit (UL) is the maximum amount of nutrient intake that would not induce overconsumption-associated health problems for most of the individuals in each segment. Some countries adopt estimated energy requirements (EERs) [11] or average requirements (Ars) in the energy section [12]. The indicators for which nutrients are recommended in the DRI vary country-wise. However, the spirit of evidence-based policy making (EBPM) can be seen in most countries’ DRIs. These guidelines are designed to cover a wide range of targets, with thresholds set for each sex and age group. Their common aim is to maintain the nation’s health and prevent lifestyle-related diseases, as described in the Japanese guideline [1].
Their values were designed through experts’ critical reviews. In the U.S., it has been reported that experts discussed the future possibility of incorporating systematic reviews and meta-analyses [13]. This process might contribute to creating more scientific and objective guidelines.
In this section, we first introduce a unique aspect of the Japanese DRI [1]. Next, we discuss DRIs from representative countries, such as the US (jointly with Canada) [14], the EU (EFSA DRI) [12], France [15], and Australia (jointly with New Zealand) [16]. The specific values for all nutrients are not listed because this was not the purpose of the present study.

3.2. DRIs from Japan and Other Countries

The Japanese DRI provides guidelines for recommended nutrient intake ranges for each age group [1] and is regularly updated by the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare (MHLW) based on new studies. The Japanese DRI recommends the nutrient quantities required for diverse targets, including healthy people, and for preventing lifestyle-related diseases and frailty. The nutrients covered in the DRI include energy, protein, lipids (total fats, saturated fatty acids, n-6/n-3 lipids, etc.), carbohydrates, fiber, vitamins (A, D, E, K, B1, B2, niacin, B6, B12, folic acid, pantothenic acid, biotin, and C), and minerals (sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, iron, zinc, copper, manganese, iodine, selenium, chromium, and molybdenum). The notable points for each item are described below.
Sex-stratified estimated EERs have been established for three physical activity levels. Both excessive energy intake and energy scarcity are major health concerns in Japan. Cinderella weight has been described earlier, and the Japanese DRI mentioned the wide prevalence of underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2), especially among young women.
Regarding fat intake, the Japanese DRI did not mention the recommended amounts of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) or eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), unlike other countries’ DRIs (Figure 1). Although the Japanese DRI references a representative meta-analysis of DHA and EPA, it was concluded that specifying a clear value was difficult, and the situation is similar for trans-fats (Figure 1). The Japanese DRI did not offer a recommendation regarding the LDL/HDL ratio, despite citing a well-known journal article about this topic [17].
In the lipid-soluble vitamin section, no standard has been established for choline in the Japanese DRI, in contrast to other countries. Although studies on the importance of choline have been published in Japan, they have not attracted much attention [18]. Efforts to avoid excessive vitamin D intake through establishing an AI that considers the vitamin D production in the skin by sunlight have been undertaken. The AI and UL were set for vitamin E, and the deficiency limits were not discussed, as a deficiency in this vitamin is not a major problem in Japan. Regarding vitamin K, the AI was the only specification. For water-soluble vitamins, the UL is not listed, although some studies on overdose have been published [19,20].
The salt intake range was typical in the micronutrient section. The latest version (2020 version) of the Japanese DRI sets a <7.5 and <6.5 g/day limit for adult men and women, respectively. The amount seems to be higher than other guidelines; however, separately strict ranges are provided for CKD and hypertension prevention.
For potassium, the Japanese DRI introduced the importance of consuming 3510 mg (90 mmol) per day based on the WHO guidelines [21] and a meta-analysis [22]. However, unique amounts, 2500 and 2000 mg AI for adult men and women, respectively, were listed because of the large discrepancy regarding the average intake of the Japanese people. For calcium, the EAR and RDA were calculated using a different method compared to that in the U.S., as the balance test is not conducted on Japanese people.
The Japanese DRIs had no large difference in trace metals, except for iodine, compared to those in other countries. A higher UL than that in the U.S. has been set because the Japanese consume more iodine from dietary sources, such as seaweed. Furthermore, this does not apply if people consume dietary items that are particularly high in iodine, such as kelp.
Although water is mentioned frequently in the DRI of each country, in Japan it is only introduced as a reference, and no specific target amount has been set. This is because, in Western countries, approximately 20–30% of water intake comes from food, whereas in Japan the ratio is approximately 50% of that intake [23], reflecting the unique Japanese culture. Another reason might be easy access to safe drinking water and the fact that the Japanese people drink a lot of tap water [24].
Next, we discuss DRIs outside of Japan. Differences between guidelines are probably most noticeable for lipids. In the U.S., standards are defined not only for n-3 and n-6 fatty acids but also for linoleic acid and α-linolenic acid [25]. The levels of cholesterol and trans fats have also been reported to be as low as possible. In Australia and New Zealand, AI of total fat, n-6 unsaturated fatty acids, and n-3 unsaturated fatty acids is set for infants (0–1 years). AI for other sections is specified for linoleic acid, α-linolenic acid, and total n-3 (DHA + EPA + docosapentaenoic acid [DPA]) [16]. In the protein section, recommendations for essential amino acids are also described in the U.S. [25] and France [26]. Regarding sugar, some DRIs outside of Japan discuss the amount: the U.S. [27], UK [28], and France [26]. However, some differences exist, such as limiting the definition to added sugars (the U.S.) and expanding it to free sugars (the UK).

3.3. Brief Summary

In this section, we discuss the major DRIs. Despite slight differences in the nutrients mentioned in each country’s DRI, all DRIs had one common characteristic: they all present clear values from previous research on the required dietary nutrient quantity for citizens. This clarity is advantageous for the DRIs in each country, albeit with the disadvantage of being difficult to utilize in real life. People must calculate the nutrient content of ingredients every time before cooking. Furthermore, not all nutrient content is listed on commercially available foods. Therefore, it is unrealistic to determine all the nutrient proportions that are consumed daily. This may be a reason for the discrepancy between ideal and actual nutrition intake. Table 1 summarizes each country’s DRI, as previously reviewed by Kishida [29].

4. Food-Based Guidelines

4.1. Overview

The standards defined for nutrient quantities are scientifically clear but difficult to incorporate into real-life applications. Therefore, food balance guides that recommend food ingredients have been adopted in many countries. In addition, various diets have been reported, and their guidelines were published.

4.2. Food Balance Guides from Japan and Other Countries

The Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries (MAFF) of Japan designed a food balance guide [2]. Through easy-to-understand visual diagrams (Figure 2a), the guide recommends the daily consumption of vegetables, meat, fish, dairy products, and fruits. Unlike the DRI, this provides the advantage of visual representation to ascertain whether the meals are well balanced, although a disadvantage is that it is difficult to calculate how many servings of each menu item are used. Although some examples are provided at the end of the balance guide, the variation is too small to be considered in daily life.
Another unique point is that water and snacks are not mentioned, which should be considered separately in this balance guide. Therefore, it is difficult for untrained individuals to use a balance guide correctly.
Guidelines defined by foods rather than nutrients are utilized not only in Japan but also in many other countries.
In the U.S., the My Plate Plan has been proposed by the FDA and USDA [30]. The concept of visualizing the grains, vegetables, proteins, fruits, and dairy products that should be consumed along with the calories that are to be consumed is the same as that used in The Spinning Top in Japan (Figure 2b). However, the recommended doses vary slightly (Table 2). Additionally, the contents of added sugar, saturated fat, and sodium are included in the guidelines. Furthermore, the FDA and the USDA dietary guidelines for Americans [27] have features that are not found in Japanese guidelines, such as setting recommended amounts of vegetables by color and mentioning whole grains. The upper limit of sodium intake is 2300 mg (equivalent to 5.8 g of salt), which is lower than that in the Japanese DRI.
In the UK, the NHS proposed the Eat Well Guide (Figure 2c) [32], which comprises five sections: “Fruit and vegetables”, “Beans, pulses, fish, egg, meat, and other proteins”, “Potatoes, bread, rice, pasta, and other starchy carbohydrates”, “Dairy and alternatives”, and “Oil and spreads”. In particular, the fruit and vegetable section, which recommends five portions per day, is well-as the “5 a day guideline”. The principle underlying the UK’s guideline can be described as not requiring to be achieved during every meal. Achieving a good balance within a day or week is important. Therefore, the daily standard values are not stringently defined, except in the “Fruit and vegetable” section. In the protein section, two portions of fish, one of which is oily fish, per week, and consuming as little red meat as possible are recommended. In the carbohydrate section, the benefits of whole grains are explained. Moreover, the guideline clarifies that carbohydrates have fewer calories than fats and includes a consideration of excessive concerns about weight gain. Independent of the five main sections, the guideline recommends drinking plenty of fluids (6 to 8 cups) daily. This unique point differs from the Japanese and U.S. guidelines mentioned above. Additionally, fruit juice is recommended not to exceed 150 mL/day.
Similar food base guides have been issued in Middle Eastern countries. However, perhaps because of their unique food culture, their contents are characteristic. In Saudi Arabia, the Healthy Food Palm was issued by the SFDA (Figure 2d) [33]. As shown in Table 2, the upper limit of some foods, such as fruits and grains, was slightly higher than that of others. This may reflect the unique Arabian food culture, consuming diverse grains in one meal and with a preference for dates. It should also be noted that the level of academic reference is also, with many academic papers cited and clearly stated in the guidelines. However, Halawani reported that adherence to the guidelines was extremely low (26%) and should be improved [34].
In Australia, the NHMRC established the Australian Guide for Healthy Eating (Figure 2e) [35]. This was similar to that of the Japanese Food Guide Spinning Top, but the recommended amount differed slightly (Table 2). One of the unique features of this guideline is the recommendation of one or two meat-free meals per week.
As described above, worldwide, countries issue food-based guidelines. Only a few studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of this type of guideline. McCarthy reported that the U.S. My Plate guideline could ensure satiety for continuity, compared with calorie count [36]. Although significant changes in waist circumference were shown in some subgroups, continuous improvement in blood pressure was not observed. Fuller demonstrated that education based on the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating for 6 weeks successfully reduced body weight (2 kg) [37]. However, few research results are available to the best of our knowledge, and this might be one of the weak points of food-based guidelines.
Unlike the DRI, the advantage of this type of guideline is that it is easy to calculate from when cooking independently. On the other hand, however, the need to manage all cooking processes is a weak point of this guideline. It is unrealistic to live without any processed food or eating out; therefore, more realistic methods are required.

4.3. DASH Diet

The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), a part of the NIH, suggests that the Dietary Approach to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet contributes to the prevention and treatment of hypertension. As the name suggests, this diet is designed to manage blood pressure at appropriate levels. Similar to the food-based guidelines for each country presented in the previous section, the DASH diet recommends the amount of food that should be consumed in a day (or, in some cases, a week). However, numerous studies have evaluated the effectiveness of the DASH diet, which is supported by strong evidence. In 2020, Filippou reviewed 30 RCTs that evaluated the effect of the DASH diet on blood pressure, and their meta-analysis showed a significantly positive effect [38]. If limited to hypertensive persons, the significance remains unchanged. Based on a meta-analysis of cohort studies, Theodoridis reported that adherence to the DASH diet was associated with a reduction in blood pressure [39]. A large, long-term (median duration: 22 years) cohort study showed that adherence to the DASH diet reduced the risk of heart failure (HF) [40].
As shown in Table 2, the DASH diet has good nutritional balance, which may improve lipid metabolism, obesity, and blood pressure. Numerous reports of the various benefits of the DASH diet have been published. In 2021, Lari reviewed 54 clinical trials and concluded that the effects of the DASH diet included a reduction in body weight, BMI, waist circumference (WC), and total/LDL cholesterol [41]. Furthermore, Soltani’s meta-analysis supported the robust effects of BMI and WC [42]. A large-scale cohort study showed that adherence to the DASH diet was associated with a reduced risk of frailty in women [43]. Surprisingly, positive effects for neuro-psychological functions, such as sleep initiation, were reported by young women [44].
As shown in this section, the DASH diet has good potential not only for blood pressure management but also for regulating various other factors. Maintaining a high level of compliance is important to maximize these benefits. Kwan concluded that effective approaches beyond counseling alone should be investigated [45]. For example, Japanese medical researchers and a food company modified the limitations to customize the DASH diet for the Japanese culture (e.g., dietary salt was permitted for 8 g/day), and they succeeded in maintaining high compliance (88.5%) for 2 months [46]. Thus, the effects of the modified DASH diet were assessed in a single-arm study; however, more detailed studies are required, as well as activities to increase public awareness.

4.4. The Mediterranean Diet

The Mediterranean diet (MD) is a traditional meal consumed in Mediterranean countries, such as France, Italy, and Greece. Although the details vary slightly depending on the article and organization, the basic concept of the Mediterranean Pyramid comprises a detailed balance of food ingredients (Table 2). Although the high consumption of olive oil is well known, other characteristics include high fruit intake and a strict intake of red and processed meats (Figure 2f).
The MD is a traditional dietary pattern that has been evaluated for its health benefits. The historical origin of the research for this diet extends to The Seven Countries Study in the 1950s, which reported a remarkably low prevalence of coronary heart disease (CHD) [47]. Showing a robust weight-loss effect with a 2-year intervention, the comparison of low-fat and low-carbohydrate diets was an epoch-making discovery [48]. Despite a tendency to focus attention only on the anti-obesity effect in this study, it should not be overlooked that the MD showed the most favorable results in the sub-analysis of the diabetic group. Furthermore, another RCT showed the effect of diet on blood pressure and glucose metabolism compared with a low-fat diet [49]. The Nu-Age trial, a large-scale intervention study for evaluating the effects of frailty, is also well-known [50]. However, this clarified that a high compliance rate was also important.
Its potential is also well-studied compared with other diet theories. Lista indicated a cardiovascular disease prevention effect compared with the low-fat diet [51]. The PREDIMED trial, another comparison with a low-fat diet, reported multiple benefits of the MD, such as on cognitive function [52] and diabetes prevention [53].
Several organizations have focused on activities to promote the MD. The American Heart Association recommends the MD and provides some recipes on its homepage. The International Foundation of the Mediterranean Diet has focused on a more active awareness campaign and on publishing some academic papers [54,55].

4.5. Nordic Diet

In addition to the MD, Nordic diet (ND) has recently attracted considerable attention. It shares the same basic philosophy of consuming less processed red meat and more plant-based foods [56]. The most notable differences from the MD are: (1) the active use of canola oil instead of olive oil, (2) the intake of berries, and (3) the active intake of fatty fish, such as salmon.
The beneficial effects of ND have also been well documented. Kanerva et al. showed that high adherence to the ND was associated with weight change in a large-scale study in Finland [57]. In an RCT, gene expression associated with inflammation, such as LILRB2 and IL32, was found to be downregulated by the ND [58]. Another RCT showed significant weight and blood pressure reduction in obese participants compared with the average Danish diet [59]. The health benefits of ND are not limited to those related to obesity. The effects on frailty, particularly on muscle strength, have also been observed in older women [60]. Moreover, its effect on children has been well studied. Sørensen reported that 3 months of consumption of the ND improved school performance for children in a crossover interventional study [61]. Sabet reported improvement in depressive symptoms with an 8-day intervention for ND in an RCT [62].
Although ND has been reported to have various advantages, they are relatively new, as shown by the paucity of literature. Compared with the MD, there are issues regarding their recognition by the public. The Nordic Council of Ministers published the Nordic Nutrition Recommendations and renewed them in 2023 [63,64]. The basic principles of ND are introduced in this guideline. The issue is how far it will spread outside Nordic countries in the future.

4.6. Japanese Traditional Diet (Washoku)

The Seven Countries Study showed a low prevalence of CHD in Japan [47], and the traditional Japanese diet (washoku) has received attention worldwide. Unlike the MD and ND, there is no strict definition of washoku; however, there is a basic form that has reached a certain degree of consensus: one miso-based soup and three dishes with rice as the staple food [65]. It should be noted that dishes that are popular and special overseas, such as sushi, tempura, and donburi, are not included in washoku here. It is well known that Japanese dishes tend to contain a high salt content, which is thought to be one reason for the high prevalence of hypertension [66]. To solve this problem, several methods have been developed to retain the advantages of washoku, while incorporating improvements.
A well-known RCT of washoku was reported by Maruyama; serum total/LDL cholesterol and triglycerides were significantly reduced for 6 months compared to the partial intervention group, due to nutritional education about their washoku-based meals, named the Japan diet [3]. Moreover, Sakane reported beneficial effects for serum cholesterol and triglyceride metabolism of Smart washoku, their newly modified washoku, based on a crossover interventional study [67]. Animal studies conducted to clarify the mechanisms and changes in the expression of genes related to lipid metabolism, such as Ucp2, Fabp4, and Fabp5, were considered for association [68]. As shown in the papers cited in this chapter, there are few intervention studies on washoku, whereas several cohort studies other than the Seven countries study have been reported. For example, the Kashiwa study revealed a relationship between washoku and sarcopenia [69]. The JPHC study showed that washoku, containing a wide variety of ingredients, was associated with total mortality [70].
MAFF also promotes washoku; however, its main objective is to promote food culture rather than nutrition education. The Japan Atherosclerosis Society is promoting the Japan diet for humans with high LDL cholesterol or triglycerides; the balance for high LDL cholesterol is shown in Table 2. Other local Japanese governments and food companies are working to promote washoku, but the reality is that the Westernization of food has moved away from the traditional style of the 1970s, which was considered as having the best balance [71].

4.7. The EAT-Lancet Guideline

The EAT-Lancet guidelines (ELG) focus on health and sustainability [72]. Recently, prospective cohort studies evaluating health outcomes have been conducted. Langmann et al. reported that guideline adherence was associated with the prevalence of type 2 diabetes in the Danish population [73]. Zhang et al. reported similar results in a cohort study conducted in Sweden [74]. Tonstad et al. reported that, the higher the rate of plant-based protein sources, the lower the incidence of diabetes in a cohort study [75]. As shown in Table 2, this guideline recommends more plant-based and less animal meat as a protein source. Thus, a diet based on ELG might have a positive impact on diabetes, and the results of Langmann and Zhang are reasonable. Another cohort study indicated that meals based on ELG were not associated with cardiovascular disease, but reduced cancer risks in the female or low-alcohol consumption subgroups [76]. On the other hand, concerns remain that extreme restrictions on meat consumption may cause emotional stress [77].
Since this guideline focuses not only on wellness but also on sustainability, in just a few years it has attracted the interest of researchers in many fields, including sociologists and environmentalists, and its positive effects in their research area have been discussed [78]. However, some researchers have noted that citizens face challenges in incorporating these guidelines into their real lives. Adherence to this guideline is difficult for economically poor populations [79]. A solution to this issue is needed in the future.

4.8. Brief Summary

In this section, we discuss food-based guidelines. The advantages of these guidelines are that they are easy to reproduce because they are free from nutritional calculation. However, cultural differences and distances might pose challenges when obtaining foods described in these guidelines. For example, Tayyem compared the diet of Jordanian pregnant women with that recommended in the American MyPlate plan [80]. The majority of participants consumed more fruits and grains than the guideline recommendation. Notably, in the Saudi Arabia section, this divergence is understandable given the Middle Eastern culture, where dates and various staple foods are common. Another example is that in Japan, only 0.04% of total olive oil consumption is produced domestically [81]. To make matters worse, the price is increasing exponentially [82]. Therefore, it is economically difficult to consume olive oil in Japan, as recommended by the MD guidelines.
Thus, recommending food-based guidelines without considering foreign cultures and challenges is undesirable. A different approach with significantly improved science communication might be needed.

5. Recent Notable Consumer Communications

Although several systems have been reviewed, it is difficult to determine whether they provide sufficient information to consumers in real life. All of the methods described above require customer effort, such as calculating multiple factors. Efforts have been made to provide consumers with easy-to-understand visual information. Here, we introduce two typical examples of science communication.
The first is the Health Star Rating System (HSR) in Australia and New Zealand. This system reviews nutritional quality from a 0.5-point star (worst) to a 10-point star (best) [83]. In addition to the star points, the five columns indicate the energy, saturated fat, sugar, salt, and fiber contents. If each product meets certain criteria, it can be labeled “high” or “low”, making it easy for consumers to select “healthy products.” Jones reviewed government reports and journal articles and concluded that awareness was increasing, but campaign reach remained low, and the impact on consumer purchasing was unknown [84]. However, a large-scale cohort study showed that dietary patterns of primary foods with high HSR were associated with weight loss [85]. Pan et al. also demonstrated its positive effect on mortality in Australia [86]. The government led this system, and food companies voluntarily labeled the star points; however, Maganja revealed that only 14.3% of the products in online stores used by most of the public were labeled with the HSR [87]. He also pointed out that products with a higher HSR tend to display more star points and may be regarded by food companies as marketing tools. It is important to understand how governments can cooperate with food companies in the future.
The second is the Japan Optimized Nutri-Dense Meals Association (H. Itoh is the president). The association’s mission is to promote Optimized Nutri-Dense Meals and offer multiple choices of nutritionally well-balanced meals with good flavor, which are available at any time of the day. An Optimized Nutri-Dense Meal is defined as one in which major nutrients are balanced and appropriately adjusted for each target group of individuals, as specified by age, sex, lifestyle, and other criteria. For example, for obese people, meals with moderate or relatively low energy content, but adjusted to include sufficient nutrients with an appropriate balance of proteins, fats, and carbohydrates, should be served. For older people, a small meal, which could be consumed without difficulty, with an appropriate quantity of nutrients, such as proteins and calcium, and with sufficient energy content, should be provided. The association’s review is not limited to processed foods, but also applies to meal kits and menus served in restaurants.
More precisely, Optimized Nutri-Dense Meals should be designed such that, if one consumes only Optimized Nutri-Dense Meals all day and takes the energy required per day only from these meals, one can take adequate, for example, neither too much nor too little, amounts of the major nutrients required a day. Hence, one can take the proportional amount of the major nutrients according to the energy consumed from Optimized Nutri-Dense Meals, compared to the total daily energy required.
Thirty-three nutrients are required for approval (Table 3). The upper and lower limits of each nutrient were determined by sex, age, and characteristics of the target population. Each limit should be determined based on scientific evidence, such as research papers and DRIs for the Japanese population. Nutrients not listed in Table 3 are also permitted to be standardized. As of April 2024, two standards have been certified: one for age 18–64 and another for seniors. RCT design trials showed positive effects on hypertension, diabetes, and frailty prevention [88,89]. Multiple single-arm studies also demonstrated potential benefits, not only in physical parameters but also in work productivity [90].
Providers must ensure that, if the daily calorie requirement is to be obtained entirely from their meals, the amount of each nutrient should not exceed the upper and lower limits. Providers will also be required to verify the effects of their meals on health in human clinical trials, such as the study by Shobako et al. [88,89].
The certification committee performs meal certification audits to investigate whether the submitted meals satisfy registered nutritional standards. They allow approved meals to be labeled with an association-approval mark that customers can easily recognize (Figure 3). As this system has just been implemented, it is important to determine how far it can modulate people’s lives.

6. Conclusions and Further Perspective

Many countries have set DRIs for national health improvement. Such countries have also published a parallel set of food-based guidelines to make it easier for individuals to reproduce them when cooking. This was accompanied by visually clear reference diagrams of spins, palm trees, and circles. Unique dietary patterns, such as the MD, DASH diet, and washoku (Japanese diet), are also being devised by academic societies and associations for communication with consumers. Furthermore, simple systems such as HSR and approval marks for Optimized Nutri-Dense Meals are now available. We hope this initiative will spread worldwide soon. However, efforts to raise awareness of these factors are needed.
Therefore, governments and food companies need to communicate more closely with consumers. Science communication can be considered in multiple ways. Maruyama classified the methods of science communication into four types: information, financial, regulatory, and nudge [91]. The information approach is a classical style of providing information to the public. The DRIs and guidelines discussed in this review provide typical examples. Financial approaches have a long history in nutritional science communication; the soda tax is an epochal example. Several studies show that soda taxes effectively reduce sweet beverage consumption [92,93], but the opposite result has also been reported [94]. Wright reviewed that a tax burden of more than 20% is critical for the financial approach to be effective [95]. Momin pointed out that the balance between effectiveness and ethical aspects must be carefully judged, and there are hurdles to its implementation [96]. Furthermore, difficulties in maintaining support have been studied, depending on the timing of exposure of the oppositional message from industry [97]. A regulatory approach imposes strong public restrictions. The legal prohibition of trans fats in the U.S. exemplifies this. Partially hydrogenated oils, a major source of trans fats, are also prohibited in Thailand. Chavasit reported a significant reduction in trans fats in distributed bakery products [98]. However, it is impractical to apply this method to individual dietary patterns. In recent years, nudges have received considerable attention in the field of public health. Detailed experimentation is described in Maruyama’s article; simply, this is a “gentle poke” aimed at an individual or group’s decision-making, without coercion. The introduction of simple symbols is a well-known example of nudge. This visual effect is more effective in motivating people rather than authoritative commands; a social examination of social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic era demonstrated this [99]. Ellis reported that Het Vinkje contributed to consumer’s choice [100]. Het Vinkje is a mark approved for foods recognized in the Netherlands as having a low number of unhealthy components, such as saturated fatty acids [101]. Of course, examples of nudges are not limited to this. A nudge can also provide information that reminds people of their “ownership”. This approach has been noted for promoting COVID-19 vaccination [102] wherein information emphasizing that “the vaccine was prepared for you” stimulated ownership and accelerated COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Considering these examples, HSR and Optimized Nutri-Dense Meals, and labeling with eye-catching symbols, might be a noteworthy example of nudge in nutritional science. Since the target was subdivided to easily realize the idea “this product is for me”, Optimized Nutri-Dense Meals might be a more in-depth nudge example. We hope that science communication in dietary methods will develop beyond a mere “information approach” in the future. For further study, we aim to investigate its contribution to behavioral changes and health status.

7. Limitation

Our review had two limitations. First, it was not a systematic review. Countries and guidelines were selected based on the author’s interest. For example, we did not discuss guidelines in African countries, as recently reviewed by Anuson-Quampah [103]. In particular, traditional diets in Nigeria were reviewed in depth [104]. However, major guidelines are included in this article. Second, we focused on DRIs only for healthy young to middle-aged people. For instance, the Japanese DRI has established detailed classification and standard values for people over 50 years. While these details are important, our focus was on comparing various communications, such as guidelines. We hope that our review will contribute to the development of science communication.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.S.; Methodology, N.S.; writing—original draft preparation, N.S.; writing—review and editing, K.H. and H.I.; visualization, N.S.; supervision, H.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare Dietary Reference Intakes for Japanese (2020). Available online: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/001151422.pdf (accessed on 20 June 2024).
  2. The Ministry of Agriculture Forestry and Fishers. The Ministry of Health Labor and Welfare Japanese Food Guide Spinning Top. Available online: https://www.maff.go.jp/j/balance_guide/b_use/pdf/eng_reiari.pdf (accessed on 29 March 2024).
  3. Maruyama, C.; Shijo, Y.; Kameyama, N.; Umezawa, A.; Sato, A.; Nishitani, A.; Ayaori, M.; Ikewaki, K.; Waki, M.; Teramoto, T. Effects of Nutrition Education Program for the Japan Diet on Serum Ldl-Cholesterol Concentration in Patients with Dyslipidemia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2021, 28, 1035–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Abarca-Gómez, L.; Abdeen, Z.A.; Hamid, Z.A.; Abu-Rmeileh, N.M.; Acosta-Cazares, B.; Acuin, C.; Adams, R.J.; Aekplakorn, W.; Afsana, K.; Aguilar-Salinas, C.A.; et al. Worldwide Trends in Body-Mass Index, Underweight, Overweight, and Obesity from 1975 to 2016: A Pooled Analysis of 2416 Population-Based Measurement Studies in 128·9 Million Children, Adolescents, and Adults. Lancet 2017, 390, 2627–2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ikeda, N.; Nishi, N.; Noda, H.; Noda, M. Trends in Prevalence and Management of Diabetes and Related Vascular Risks in Japanese Adults: Japan National Health and Nutrition Surveys 2003–2012. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2017, 127, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ogawa, W.; Gupta, P. The Humanistic and Societal Impact of Obesity in Japan: A Targeted Literature Review. Endocr. J. 2024, 71, 273–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Iizuka, K.; Sato, H.; Kobae, K.; Yanagi, K.; Yamada, Y.; Ushiroda, C.; Hirano, K.; Ichimaru, S.; Seino, Y.; Ito, A.; et al. Young Japanese Underweight Women with “Cinderella Weight” Are Prone to Malnutrition, Including Vitamin Deficiencies. Nutrients 2023, 15, 2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Powell, J.; Pring, T. The Impact of Social Media Influencers on Health Outcomes: Systematic Review. Soc. Sci. Med. 2024, 340, 116472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. The National Nutrition Survey, Japan: NNS-J. Available online: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/000711006.pdf (accessed on 18 June 2024).
  10. World Health Statistics 2022: Monitoring Health for the SDGs, Sustainable Development Goals; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022.
  11. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2023; ISBN 9780309697231.
  12. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). Dietary Reference Values for Nutrients Summary Report. EFSA Support. Publ. 2017, 14, e15121E. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Maitin-Shepard, M.; Flaxman, M. Use of Meta-Analyses in Nutrition Research and Policy: Best Practices of Conducting Meta-Analysis: Proceedings of a Workshop in Brief; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2024; ISBN 9780309715393. [Google Scholar]
  14. US Department of Health and Human Services Dietary Reference Intake. Available online: https://nap.nationalacademies.org/topic/380/food-and-nutrition/nutrition-dietary-reference-intakes (accessed on 29 March 2024).
  15. The French Food Safety Agency Références Nutritionnelles. Available online: https://www.anses.fr/fr/content/avis-du-ces-nutrition-humaine (accessed on 29 March 2024).
  16. National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia); New Zealand Ministry of Health. Nutrient Reference Values. Available online: https://www.eatforhealth.gov.au/nutrient-reference-values (accessed on 29 March 2024).
  17. Ascherio, A.; Katan, M.B.; Zock, P.L.; Stampfer, M.J.; Willett, W.C. Trans Fatty Acids and Coronary Heart Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 1999, 340, 1994–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ohkubo, T. The Importance of Dietary Choline Intake. Vitamins 2020, 94, 539–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mills, C.A. Thiamine Overdosage and Toxicity. JAMA J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1941, 116, 2101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. McKenney, J.M. A Comparison of the Efficacy and Toxic Effects of Sustained- vs Immediate-Release Niacin in Hypercholesterolemic Patients. JAMA J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1994, 271, 672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. WHO. Guideline: Potassium Intake for Adults and Children. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241504829 (accessed on 22 January 2024).
  22. Vinceti, M.; Filippini, T.; Crippa, A.; de Sesmaisons, A.; Wise, L.A.; Orsini, N. Meta-Analysis of Potassium Intake and the Risk of Stroke. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2016, 5, e004210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Jéquier, E.; Constant, F. Water as an Essential Nutrient: The Physiological Basis of Hydration. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 64, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ohno, K.; Ohno, K.; Asami, M.; Matsui, Y. Is the Default of 2 Liters for Daily Per-Capita Water Consumption Appropriate? A Nationwide Survey Reveals Water Intake in Japan. J. Water Health 2018, 16, 562–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids (Macronutrients); National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2005; ISBN 030908525X.
  26. French Agency for Food Safety. Apport en Protéines: Consommation, Qualité, Besoins et Recommandations. Available online: https://www.anses.fr/fr/system/files/NUT-Sy-Proteines.pdf (accessed on 20 June 2024).
  27. U.S. Department of Agriculture; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2020–2025 (9th Edition). 2020. Available online: https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov/sites/default/files/2020-12/Dietary_Guidelines_for_Americans_2020-2025.pdf (accessed on 29 March 2024).
  28. Public Health England. Government Dietary Recommendations: Government Recommendations for Energy and Nutrients for Males and Females Aged 1–18 Years and 19+ Years. 2016. Available online: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a749fece5274a44083b82d8/government_dietary_recommendations.pdf (accessed on 26 June 2024).
  29. Koshida, E.; Okada, C.; Okada, E.; Matsumoto, M.; Takimoto, H. Comparison of Dietary Reference Intakes and Their Applications between Japan and Other Countries. Jpn. J. Nutr. Diet. 2021, 79, 14–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. US Department of Agriculture. Food and Drug Administration My Plate. Available online: https://www.myplate.gov/ (accessed on 29 March 2024).
  31. D’Alessandro, A.; Lampignano, L.; De Pergola, G. Mediterranean Diet Pyramid: A Proposal for Italian People. A Systematic Review of Prospective Studies to Derive Serving Sizes. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. National Health Services. The Eatwell Guide. Available online: https://www.nhs.uk/live-well/eat-well/food-guidelines-and-food-labels/the-eatwell-guide/#:~:text=Aim%20to%20eat%20at%20least,of%20vitamins%2C%20minerals%20and%20fibre (accessed on 29 March 2024).
  33. Hamad Al-Dkheel, M. Dietary Guidelines for Saudis: The Healthy Food Palm; Saudi Ministry of Health, General Directorate of Nutrition: Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  34. Halawani, R.; Jaceldo-Siegl, K.; Bahjri, K.; Heskey, C. Saudi Population’s Adherence to the Healthy Food Palm: A Cross-Sectional Study (P16-066-19). Curr. Dev. Nutr. 2019, 3, 3131618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. National Health and Medical Council. Australian Guide to Healthy Eating. Available online: https://www.eatforhealth.gov.au/guidelines/australian-guide-healthy-eating (accessed on 29 March 2024).
  36. McCarthy, W.J.; Rico, M.; Chandler, M.; Herman, D.R.; Chang, C.; Belin, T.R.; Love, S.; Ramirez, E.; Gelberg, L. Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial of 2 Federally Recommended Strategies to Reduce Excess Body Fat in Overweight, Low-Income Patients: Myplate.Gov vs Calorie Counting. Ann. Fam. Med. 2023, 21, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fuller, N.R.; Fong, M.; Gerofi, J.; Leung, L.; Leung, C.; Denyer, G.; Caterson, I.D. A Randomized Controlled Trial to Determine the Efficacy of a High Carbohydrate and High Protein Ready-to-Eat Food Product for Weight Loss. Clin. Obes. 2016, 6, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Filippou, C.D.; Tsioufis, C.P.; Thomopoulos, C.G.; Mihas, C.C.; Dimitriadis, K.S.; Sotiropoulou, L.I.; Chrysochoou, C.A.; Nihoyannopoulos, P.I.; Tousoulis, D.M. Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Diet and Blood Pressure Reduction in Adults with and without Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Adv. Nutr. 2020, 11, 1150–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Theodoridis, X.; Chourdakis, M.; Chrysoula, L.; Chroni, V.; Tirodimos, I.; Dipla, K.; Gkaliagkousi, E.; Triantafyllou, A. Adherence to the DASH Diet and Risk of Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients 2023, 15, 3261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Ibsen, D.B.; Levitan, E.B.; Åkesson, A.; Gigante, B.; Wolk, A. The DASH Diet Is Associated with a Lower Risk of Heart Failure: A Cohort Study. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2022, 29, 1114–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lari, A.; Sohouli, M.H.; Fatahi, S.; Cerqueira, H.S.; Santos, H.O.; Pourrajab, B.; Rezaei, M.; Saneie, S.; Rahideh, S.T. The Effects of the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Diet on Metabolic Risk Factors in Patients with Chronic Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2021, 31, 2766–2778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Soltani, S.; Shirani, F.; Chitsazi, M.J.; Salehi-Abargouei, A. The Effect of Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Diet on Weight and Body Composition in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials. Obes. Rev. 2016, 17, 442–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Struijk, E.A.; Hagan, K.A.; Fung, T.T.; Hu, F.B.; Rodríguez-Artalejo, F.; Lopez-Garcia, E. Diet Quality and Risk of Frailty among Older Women in the Nurses’ Health Study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2020, 111, 877–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Saharkhiz, M.; Khorasanchi, Z.; Karbasi, S.; Jafari-Nozad, A.M.; Naseri, M.; Mohammadifard, M.; Siami Ali Abad, M.; Ayadilord, M.; Ferns, G.A.; Bahrami, A. The Association between Adherence to a Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Diet and Neuro-Psychological Function in Young Women. BMC Nutr. 2021, 7, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kwan, M.W.M.; Wong, M.C.S.; Wang, H.H.X.; Liu, K.Q.L.; Lee, C.L.S.; Yan, B.P.Y.; Yu, C.M.; Griffiths, S.M. Compliance with the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Diet: A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e78412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kawamura, A.; Kajiya, K.; Kishi, H.; Inagaki, J.; Mitarai, M.; Oda, H.; Umemoto, S.; Kobayashi, S. Effects of the DASH-JUMP Dietary Intervention in Japanese Participants with High-Normal Blood Pressure and Stage 1 Hypertension: An Open-Label Single-Arm Trial. Hypertens. Res. 2016, 39, 777–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Menotti, A.; Puddu, P.E. How the Seven Countries Study Contributed to the Definition and Development of the Mediterranean Diet Concept: A 50-Year Journey. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2015, 25, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Shai, I.; Schwarzfuchs, D.; Henkin, Y.; Shahar, D.R.; Witkow, S.; Greenberg, I.; Golan, R.; Fraser, D.; Bolotin, A.; Vardi, H.; et al. Weight Loss with a Low-Carbohydrate, Mediterranean, or Low-Fat Diet. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 359, 229–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Estruch, R.; Ngel Martínez-Gonzá Lez, M.A.; Corella, D.; Salas-Salvadó, J.; Ruiz-Gutié Rrez, V.; Covas, M.I.; Covas, I.; Fiol, M.; Gó Mez-Gracia, E.; López-Sabater, M.C.; et al. Effects of a Mediterranean-Style Diet on Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Randomized Trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 2006, 145, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Marseglia, A.; Xu, W.; Fratiglioni, L.; Fabbri, C.; Berendsen, A.A.M.; Bialecka-Debek, A.; Jennings, A.; Gillings, R.; Meunier, N.; Caumon, E.; et al. Effect of the NU-AGE Diet on Cognitive Functioning in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Delgado-Lista, J.; Alcala-Diaz, J.F.; Torres-Peña, J.D.; Quintana-Navarro, G.M.; Fuentes, F.; Garcia-Rios, A.; Ortiz-Morales, A.M.; Gonzalez-Requero, A.I.; Perez-Caballero, A.I.; Yubero-Serrano, E.M.; et al. Long-Term Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease with a Mediterranean Diet and a Low-Fat Diet (CORDIOPREV): A Randomised Controlled Trial. Lancet 2022, 399, 1876–1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Martínez-Lapiscina, E.H.; Clavero, P.; Toledo, E.; Estruch, R.; Salas-Salvadó, J.; San Julián, B.; Sanchez-Tainta, A.; Ros, E.; Valls-Pedret, C.; Martinez-Gonzalez, M.Á. Mediterranean Diet Improves Cognition: The PREDIMED-NAVARRA Randomised Trial. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2013, 84, 1318–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Salas-Salvadó, J.; Bulló, M.; Babio, N.; Martínez-González, M.Á.; Ibarrola-Jurado, N.; Basora, J.; Estruch, R.; Covas, M.I.; Corella, D.; Arós, F.; et al. Reduction in the Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes with the Mediterranean Diet: Results of the PREDIMED-Reus Nutrition Intervention Randomized Trial. Diabetes Care 2011, 34, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Dernini, S.; Berry, E.M.; Serra-Majem, L.; La Vecchia, C.; Capone, R.; Medina, F.X.; Aranceta-Bartrina, J.; Belahsen, R.; Burlingame, B.; Calabrese, G.; et al. Med Diet 4.0: The Mediterranean Diet with Four Sustainable Benefits. Public Health Nutr. 2017, 20, 1322–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Serra-Majem, L.; Tomaino, L.; Dernini, S.; Berry, E.M.; Lairon, D.; de la Cruz, J.N.; Bach-Faig, A.; Donini, L.M.; Medina, F.X.; Belahsen, R.; et al. Updating the Mediterranean Diet Pyramid towards Sustainability: Focus on Environmental Concerns. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Krznarić, Ž.; Karas, I.; Ljubas Kelečić, D.; Vranešić Bender, D. The Mediterranean and Nordic Diet: A Review of Differences and Similarities of Two Sustainable, Health-Promoting Dietary Patterns. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 683678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Kanerva, N.; Harald, K.; Männistö, S.; Kaartinen, N.E.; Maukonen, M.; Haukkala, A.; Jousilahti, P. Adherence to the Healthy Nordic Diet Is Associated with Weight Change during 7 Years of Follow-Up. Br. J. Nutr. 2018, 120, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kolehmainen, M.; Ulven, S.M.; Paananen, J.; De Mello, V.; Schwab, U.; Carlberg, C.; Myhrstad, M.; Pihlajamäki, J.; Dungner, E.; Sjöolin, E.; et al. Healthy Nordic Diet Downregulates the Expression of Genes Involved in Inflammation in Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue in Individuals with Features of the Metabolic Syndrome. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2015, 101, 228–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Poulsen, S.K.; Due, A.; Jordy, A.B.; Kiens, B.; Stark, K.D.; Stender, S.; Holst, C.; Astrup, A.; Larsen, T.M. Health Effect of the New Nordic Diet in Adults with Increased Waist Circumference: A 6-Mo Randomized Controlled Trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 99, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hanbali, S.; Avgerinou, C. Association between Adherence to the Nordic Diet and Frailty in Older Adults: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies. Maturitas 2024, 182, 107923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Sorensen, L.B.; Damsgaard, C.T.; Dalskov, S.M.; Petersen, R.A.; Egelund, N.; Dyssegaard, C.B.; Stark, K.D.; Andersen, R.; Tetens, I.; Astrup, A.; et al. Diet-Induced Changes in Iron and n-3 Fatty Acid Status and Associations with Cognitive Performance in 8–11-Year-Old Danish Children: Secondary Analyses of the Optimal Well-Being, Development and Health for Danish Children through a Healthy New Nordic Diet School Meal Study. Br. J. Nutr. 2015, 114, 1623–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Sabet, J.A.; Ekman, M.S.; Sofia Lundvall, A.; Risérus, U.; Johansson, U.; Öström, Å.; Adamsson, V.; Cao, Y.; Msghina, M.; Brummer, R.J. Feasibility and Acceptability of a Healthy Nordic Diet Intervention for the Treatment of Depression: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial. Nutrients 2021, 13, 902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Mithril, C.; Dragsted, L.O.; Meyer, C.; Blauert, E.; Holt, M.K.; Astrup, A. Guidelines for the New Nordic Diet. Public Health Nutr. 2012, 15, 1941–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Nordic Council of Ministers Nordic Nutrition Recommendations. 2023. Available online: https://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1769986&dswid=8186 (accessed on 26 June 2024).
  65. Imai, T.; Miyamoto, K.; Sezaki, A.; Kawase, F.; Shirai, Y.; Abe, C.; Fukaya, A.; Kato, T.; Sanada, M.; Shimokata, H. Traditional Japanese Diet Score—Association with Obesity, Incidence of Ischemic Heart Disease, and Healthy Life Expectancy in a Global Comparative Study. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2019, 23, 717–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Imamoto, M.; Takada, T.; Sasaki, S.; Kato, K.; Onishi, Y. Salt Intake per Dish in the Japanese Diet: A Clue to Help Establish Dietary Goals at Home. J. Nutr. Sci. 2021, 10, e107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sakane, N.; Osaki, N.; Takase, H.; Suzuki, J.; Suzukamo, C.; Nirengi, S.; Suganuma, A.; Shimotoyodome, A. The Study of Metabolic Improvement by Nutritional Intervention Controlling Endogenous GIP (Mini Egg Study): A Randomized, Cross-over Study. Nutr. J. 2019, 18, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Honma, T.; Kitano, Y.; Kijima, R.; Jibu, Y.; Kawakami, Y.; Tsuduki, T.; Nakagawa, K.; Miyazawa, T. Comparison of the Health Benefits of Different Eras of Japanese Foods: Lipid and Carbohydrate Metabolism Focused Research. Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi 2013, 60, 541–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Suthutvoravut, U.; Takahashi, K.; Murayama, H.; Tanaka, T.; Akishita, M.; Iijima, K. Association Between Traditional Japanese Diet Washoku and Sarcopenia in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Findings from the Kashiwa Study. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2020, 24, 282–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kobayashi, M.; Sasazuki, S.; Shimazu, T.; Sawada, N.; Yamaji, T.; Iwasaki, M.; Mizoue, T.; Tsugane, S. Association of Dietary Diversity with Total Mortality and Major Causes of Mortality in the Japanese Population: JPHC Study. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2020, 74, 54–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Sugawara, S.; Kushida, M.; Iwagaki, Y.; Asano, M.; Yamamoto, K.; Tomata, Y.; Tsuji, I.; Tsuduki, T. The 1975 Type Japanese Diet Improves Lipid Metabolic Parameters in Younger Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Oleo Sci. 2018, 67, 599–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Willett, W.; Rockström, J.; Loken, B.; Springmann, M.; Lang, T.; Vermeulen, S.; Garnett, T.; Tilman, D.; DeClerck, F.; Wood, A.; et al. Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT–Lancet Commission on Healthy Diets from Sustainable Food Systems. Lancet 2019, 393, 447–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Langmann, F.; Ibsen, D.B.; Tjønneland, A.; Olsen, A.; Overvad, K.; Dahm, C.C. Adherence to the EAT-Lancet Diet Is Associated with a Lower Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: The Danish Diet, Cancer and Health Cohort. Eur. J. Nutr. 2023, 62, 1493–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Zhang, S.; Stubbendorff, A.; Olsson, K.; Ericson, U.; Niu, K.; Qi, L.; Borné, Y.; Sonestedt, E. Adherence to the EAT-Lancet Diet, Genetic Susceptibility, and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Swedish Adults. Metabolism 2023, 141, 155401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Tonstad, S.; Butler, T.; Yan, R.; Fraser, G.E. Type of Vegetarian Diet, Body Weight, and Prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009, 32, 791–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Berthy, F.; Brunin, J.; Allès, B.; Fezeu, L.K.; Touvier, M.; Hercberg, S.; Galan, P.; Pointereau, P.; Lairon, D.; Baudry, J.; et al. Association between Adherence to the EAT-Lancet Diet and Risk of Cancer and Cardiovascular Outcomes in the Prospective NutriNet-Sante Cohort. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2022, 116, 980–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Young, H.A. Adherence to the EAT–Lancet Diet: Unintended Consequences for the Brain? Nutrients 2022, 14, 4254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Borthwick, F.; Edgar, D.; Eltholth, M.; McNeill, G.; Tulloch, A.I.T.; Grech, A.; Boylan, S.; Perkins Centre, C.; Tulloch, A.I.T.; Borthwick, F.; et al. How the EAT-Lancet Commission on Food in the Anthropocene Influenced Discourse and Research on Food Systems: A Systematic Review Covering the First 2 Years Post-Publication. Lancet Glob. Health 2023, 11, e1125–e1136. [Google Scholar]
  79. Hirvonen, K.; Bai, Y.; Headey, D.; Masters, W.A. Affordability of the EAT–Lancet Reference Diet: A Global Analysis. Lancet Glob. Health 2020, 8, e59–e66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Tayyem, R.; Allehdan, S.S.; Al-Awwad, N.j.; Alatrash, R.M.; Mahfouz, I.A. Food Group Intake of Pregnant Jordanian Women Based on the Three Pregnancy Trimesters. Prev. Nutr. Food Sci. 2020, 25, 346–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Yukie, M.; Akira, K.; Hironori, Y. Study on Management Strategy of Olive Production and Business in Jappan. Jpn. J. Farm Manag. 2021, 58, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. High Price of Olive Oil Due to Poor Raw Material Crop; Spotlight for Blended Oils. The Nikkei Newspaper, 2 April 2024.
  83. Shahid, M.; Neal, B.; Jones, A. Uptake of Australia’s Health Star Rating System 2014–2019. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Jones, A.; Thow, A.M.; Ni Mhurchu, C.; Sacks, G.; Neal, B. The Performance and Potential of the Australasian Health Star Rating System: A Four-Year Review Using the RE-AIM Framework. Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health 2019, 43, 355–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Egnell, M.; Seconda, L.; Neal, B.; Mhurchu, C.N.; Rayner, M.; Jones, A.; Touvier, M.; Kesse-Guyot, E.; Hercberg, S.; Julia, C. Prospective Associations of the Original Food Standards Agency Nutrient Profiling System and Three Variants with Weight Gain, Overweight and Obesity Risk: Results from the French NutriNet-Santé Cohort. Br. J. Nutr. 2021, 125, 902–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Pan, X.-F.; Magliano, D.J.; Zheng, M.; Shahid, M.; Taylor, F.; Julia, C.; Ni Mhurchu, C.; Pan, A.; Shaw, J.E.; Neal, B.; et al. Seventeen-Year Associations between Diet Quality Defined by the Health Star Rating and Mortality in Australians: The Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab). Curr. Dev. Nutr. 2020, 4, nzaa157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Maganja, D.; Davies, T.; Sanavio, L.; Louie, J.C.Y.; Huffman, M.D.; Trieu, K.; Wu, J.H.Y. Current Food Labelling Practices in Online Supermarkets in Australia. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2023, 20, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Shobako, N.; Goto, C.; Nakagawa, T.; Yamato, T.; Kondo, S.; Nakamura, F.; Nakazeko, T.; Hirano, Y.; Honda, K. Hypotensive and HbA1c Reducing Effect of Novel Dietary Intervention Program “COMB Meal Program”: Two Randomized Clinical Trials. J. Funct Foods 2022, 98, 105279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Nakazeko, T.; Shobako, N.; Shioya, N.; Iwama, Y.; Hirano, Y.; Fujii, S.; Nakamura, F.; Honda, K. Frailty-Preventing Effect of an Intervention Program Using a Novel Complete Nutritional “COMB-FP Meal”: A Pilot Randomized Control Trial. Nutrients 2023, 15, 4317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Nakazeko, T.; Shobako, N.; Hirano, Y.; Nakamura, F.; Honda, K. Novel Dietary Intervention Program “COMB Meal Program” Approaching Health and Presenteeism: Two Pilot Studies. J. Funct. Foods 2022, 92, 105050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Murayama, H.; Takagi, Y.; Tsuda, H.; Kato, Y. Applying Nudge to Public Health Policy: Practical Examples and Tips for Designing Nudge Interventions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 3962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Edmondson, E.K.; Roberto, C.A.; Gregory, E.F.; Mitra, N.; Virudachalam, S. Association of a Sweetened Beverage Tax With Soda Consumption in High School Students. JAMA Pediatr. 2021, 175, 1261–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Teng, A.M.; Jones, A.C.; Mizdrak, A.; Signal, L.; Genç, M.; Wilson, N. Impact of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes on Purchases and Dietary Intake: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Obes. Rev. 2019, 20, 1187–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Chatelan, A.; Rouche, M.; Dzielska, A.; Fismen, A.S.; Kelly, C.; Pedroni, C.; Desbouys, L.; Castetbon, K. Sixteen-Year Trends in Adolescent Consumption of Sugar-Sweetened Soda in Six European Countries with a Soda Tax and Comparison Countries: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Survey Analysis. Public Health Nutr. 2023, 26, 519–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Wright, A.; Smith, K.E.; Hellowell, M. Policy Lessons from Health Taxes: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies. BMC Public Health 2017, 17, 583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Momin, S.R.; Wood, A.C. Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Child Health: Implications for Policy. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 2018, 7, 286–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Niederdeppe, J.; Heley, K.; Barry, C.L. Inoculation and Narrative Strategies in Competitive Framing of Three Health Policy Issues. J. Commun. 2015, 65, 838–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Chavasit, V.; Photi, J.; Dunkum, P.; Krassanairawiwong, T.; Ditmetharoj, M.; Preecha, S.; Martinez, F. Evolution of Trans-Fatty Acid Consumption in Thailand and Strategies for Its Reduction. J. Clin. Hypertens. 2020, 22, 1347–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Banker, M.; Miller, M.; Voichek, G.; Goor, D.; Makov, T. Prosocial Nudges and Visual Indicators Increase Social Distancing, but Authoritative Nudges Do Not. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2116156119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Vyth, E.L.; Steenhuis, I.H.M.; Vlot, J.A.; Wulp, A.; Hogenes, M.G.; Looije, D.H.; Brug, J.; Seidell, J.C. Actual Use of a Front-of-Pack Nutrition Logo in the Supermarket: Consumers Motives in Food Choice. Public Health Nutr. 2010, 13, 1882–1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Vyth, E.L.; Steenhuis, I.H.M.; Mallant, S.F.; Mol, Z.L.; Brug, J.; Temminghoff, M.; Feunekes, G.I.; Jansen, L.; Verhagen, H.; Seidell, J.C. A Front-of-Pack Nutrition Logo: A Quantitative and Qualitative Process Evaluation in the Netherlands. J. Health Commun. 2009, 14, 631–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Dai, H.; Saccardo, S.; Han, M.A.; Roh, L.; Raja, N.; Vangala, S.; Modi, H.; Pandya, S.; Sloyan, M.; Croymans, D.M. Behavioural Nudges Increase COVID-19 Vaccinations. Nature 2021, 597, 404–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Ainuson-Quampah, J.; Amuna, N.; Holdsworth, M.; Aryeetey, R. A Review of Food-Based Dietary Guidelines in Africa: Opportunities to Enhance the Healthiness and Environmental Sustainability of Population Diets. Agric. Nutr. Dev. 2022, 22, 19471–19495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Petrikova, I.; Bhattacharjee, R.; Fraser, P.D. The ‘Nigerian Diet’ and Its Evolution: Review of the Existing Literature and Household Survey Data. Foods 2023, 12, 443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nutrients 16 02112 g001
Figure 1. Fats (recommended amount) described in Japanese DRI. The fats enclosed by the dotted rectangle are regulated in the Japanese DRI.
Figure 1. Fats (recommended amount) described in Japanese DRI. The fats enclosed by the dotted rectangle are regulated in the Japanese DRI.
Nutrients 16 02112 g001
Nutrients 16 02112 g002aNutrients 16 02112 g002b
Figure 2. Food balance guides from various countries and traditional diets. (a) Japanese Food Guide Spinning Top. (b) My plate plan in the USA. (c) The Eat well guide in the UK. (d) The healthy food palm in Saudi Arabia. (e) The Australian guide to healthy eating. (f) The Mediterranean diet.
Figure 2. Food balance guides from various countries and traditional diets. (a) Japanese Food Guide Spinning Top. (b) My plate plan in the USA. (c) The Eat well guide in the UK. (d) The healthy food palm in Saudi Arabia. (e) The Australian guide to healthy eating. (f) The Mediterranean diet.
Nutrients 16 02112 g002aNutrients 16 02112 g002b
Nutrients 16 02112 g003
Figure 3. Approval symbol for Optimized Nutri-Dense Meals. Its definition is discussed in Section 5.
Figure 3. Approval symbol for Optimized Nutri-Dense Meals. Its definition is discussed in Section 5.
Nutrients 16 02112 g003
Table 1. Differences in nutrients specified in major DRIs. The energy column shows the indicators considered for reference values. Other columns indicate whether the values were defined or not.
Table 1. Differences in nutrients specified in major DRIs. The energy column shows the indicators considered for reference values. Other columns indicate whether the values were defined or not.
NutrientsJapanU.S.EUUKFrance *Australia/New Zealand
Energy BMIEERAREAREEREER
Protein 〇〇 (+Amino Acids)〇〇〇 (+Amino Acids)〇
FatsTotal fats〇〇〇〇〇〇 (Infants only)
SFA〇〇〇 ****〇〇× **
Mono unsaturated fatty acids×××〇××
Poly unsaturated fatty acids×××〇××
n6〇〇×××〇 (0–12 month)
n3〇〇×××〇 (0–12 month)
Linoleic acid×〇〇〇〇〇 (age 1 or more)
α-linolenic acid×〇〇〇〇〇 (age 1 or more)
DHA, EPA××〇×〇〇 †
Cholesterol〇 ***〇 ****××××
Trans×〇 ****〇 ****〇〇× **
CarbohydrateCarbohydrate〇〇〇〇〇〇 (Infants only)
Fiber〇〇〇〇〇〇
Sugars×〇 (Added sugars)×〇 (Free sugars)〇 (Total sugars)×
VitaminA〇〇〇〇〇〇
D〇〇〇〇〇〇
E〇〇〇〇〇〇
K〇〇〇〇〇〇
B1〇〇〇〇〇〇
B2〇〇〇〇〇〇
Nia〇〇〇〇〇〇
B6〇〇〇〇〇〇
B12〇〇〇〇〇〇
FA〇〇〇〇〇〇
PA〇〇〇〇〇〇
Biotin〇〇〇〇〇〇
Choline×〇〇×〇〇
C〇〇〇〇〇〇
MineralsNa〇〇〇〇〇〇
K〇〇〇〇〇〇
Ca〇〇〇〇〇〇
Mg〇〇〇〇〇〇
P〇〇〇〇〇〇
Fe〇〇〇〇〇〇
Zn〇〇〇〇〇〇
Cu〇〇〇〇〇〇
Mn〇〇〇〇〇〇
I〇〇〇〇〇〇
Se〇〇〇〇〇〇
Cr〇〇×〇〇〇
Mo〇〇〇〇〇〇
F×〇〇〇〇〇
B×〇×〇××
Ni×〇××〇×
V×〇××××
Cl×〇〇〇〇×
As××××〇×
Water ×〇〇×〇〇
〇: Value was defined. ×: Value was not defined. * Some standards of nutrients were available on the ANSES homepage, but they were not English-translated guidelines (https://www.anses.fr/en/content/dietary-reference-values-vitamins-and-minerals, accessed on 26 June 2024). ** In the main text, a combined limit of 8–10% of energy from saturated and trans fats together is recommended. *** In the abstract, the specific standards were not set. However, the recommendation of less than 200 mg/day was described in the main text. **** As low as possible. † DHA + EPA + DPA. SFA, saturated fats; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; DPA, docosapentaenoic acid; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; Nia, niacin; Na, sodium; K, potassium; Ca, calcium; Mg, magnesium; P, phosphorus; Fe, iron; Zn, zinc; Cu, copper; Mn, manganese; I, iodine; Se, selenium; Cr, chromium; Mo, molybdenum; F, fluorine; B, boron; Ni, nickel; V, vanadium; Cl, chlorine; As, arsenic.
Table 2. Comparison of food-based guidelines. Recommended daily amount unless otherwise stated.
Table 2. Comparison of food-based guidelines. Recommended daily amount unless otherwise stated.
Food Guidelines JapanU.S.UKSaudi ArabiaAustraliaDASHThe Mediterranean Diet **The Japan Diet ***The EAT-LANCET
Kcal 22002200 22002500
Units servecupsportionserveserveserveservegramsgrams
Grains 5–77
(ounce)		 6–1166–8
Whole grain 3.5 (ounce) 1–2/meal 232
Refined grain 3.5
(ounce)		 ≤3/week440 (mixed with rolled oats)
250 (if “soba” choosed)
Vegetable 5–6353–5 5–64–52-/meal170 (green and yellow)
230 (others)		300 (200-600)
Dark-green 2/week
Red and orange 6/week
Beans 2/week
Starchy 6/week 11050 (0–100)
Other 5/week 60 (seaweed and mushroom)
Protein 3–56
(ounce)		 2–32.5–36 or less
Meats, poultry, eggs 28 (ounce) /week eggs: 2–4/week
poultry: 1–2/week
red meat: ≤2/week
processed meat: ≤1/week		eggs: 10
meats (without chicken skin and fat): 80		meat: 43 (0–86)
eggs: 13 (0–25)
Seafood 9 (ounce) /week2/week * 2-/week10028 (0–100)
Nuts, seeds, soyproducts 5 (ounce) /week 4–5/weeklegumes: 2-/week
olive, nuts, seeds: 1–2		soy: 100nuts: 125 (0–175)
Dairy products 23 2–42.52–3
(low fat)		2–3/meal
(low fat preferably)		210250 (0–500)
Fruits 22 2–424–51–2/meal275200 (100–300)
Oils 29 (grams) the least amount 27Unsaturated: 40 (20–80)
Saturated: 11.8 (0–11.8)
Extra virgin olive oil 3–4
Fluids 6–86 (cups)
Sodium (mg) 2300 2300
/1500		 22 (salt + miso + soysauce)
Sweets sugar: the least amount 5 or less/week≤2/week sugar:12Sugar: 31 (0–31)
* One of which is oily. ** Varies slightly in the literature; however, we refer to the article by Alessandro et al. (2019) [31]. *** We refer to the “for high LDL-cholesterol” version, whereas the “for high triglyceride” version differs slightly.
Table 3. Nutrients that need to be standardized for Optimized Nutri-Dense Meals.
Table 3. Nutrients that need to be standardized for Optimized Nutri-Dense Meals.
NutrientsLower LimitUpper LimitNutrientsLower LimitUpper Limit
Protein Niacin
Fats Vitamin B6
n-3 fatty acid Vitamin B12
Carbohydrate Folic acid
Sodium Pantothenic acid
Potassium Biotin
Calcium Vitamin C
Magnesium Isoleucine
Iron Leucine
Zinc Lysine
Copper Sulfur-containing amino acid
Vitamin A Aromatic amino acid
Vitamin D Threonine
Vitamin E Tryptophan
Vitamin K Valine
Vitamin B1 Histidine
Vitamin B2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shobako, N.; Itoh, H.; Honda, K. Typical Guidelines for Well-Balanced Diet and Science Communication in Japan and Worldwide. Nutrients 2024, 16, 2112. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16132112

AMA Style

Shobako N, Itoh H, Honda K. Typical Guidelines for Well-Balanced Diet and Science Communication in Japan and Worldwide. Nutrients. 2024; 16(13):2112. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16132112

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shobako, Naohisa, Hiroshi Itoh, and Keiko Honda. 2024. "Typical Guidelines for Well-Balanced Diet and Science Communication in Japan and Worldwide" Nutrients 16, no. 13: 2112. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16132112

APA Style

Shobako, N., Itoh, H., & Honda, K. (2024). Typical Guidelines for Well-Balanced Diet and Science Communication in Japan and Worldwide. Nutrients, 16(13), 2112. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16132112

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop