Next Article in Journal
How Immunonutritional Markers Are Associated with Age, Sex, Body Mass Index and the Most Common Chronic Diseases in the Hospitalized Geriatric Population—A Cross Sectional Study
Previous Article in Journal
Correction: Tayebati et al. Choline and Choline alphoscerate Do Not Modulate Inflammatory Processes in the Rat Brain. Nutrients 2017, 9, 1084
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 16
Issue 15
10.3390/nu16152463
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Role of Environmental and Nutritional Factors in the Development of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Case–Control Study

by
Victor Serrano-Fernandez
1,2,
Jose Alberto Laredo-Aguilera
1,2,*,
Carlos Navarrete-Tejero
1,
Brigida Molina-Gallego
1,
Angel Lopez-Fernandez-Roldan
1 and
Juan Manuel Carmona-Torres
1,2
1
Facultad de Fisioterapia y Enfermeria, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Avda. Carlos III s/n, 45071 Toledo, Spain
2
Grupo de Investigación Multidisciplinar en Cuidados (IMCU), Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Avda. Carlos III s/n, 45071 Toledo, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2024, 16(15), 2463; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16152463 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 5 July 2024 / Revised: 20 July 2024 / Accepted: 25 July 2024 / Published: 29 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Nutritional Immunology)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: The incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are increasing around the world, especially in Western countries. The objective of this study was to evaluate the health habits of healthy controls and individuals with IBDs to identify possible risk factors for IBD development. Methods: A case-control study was conducted among Spanish participants over 18 years of age. A self-administered questionnaire was completed by subjects to collect information on several sociodemographic variables and habits, such as the consumption of tobacco, alcohol, antibiotics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents and macronutrients; anxiety and depression; and quality of life. Results: The main risk factors identified were age; living in an urban environment; anxiety; and excessive consumption of proteins, carbohydrates and fats. In addition, the consumption of fibre had a preventive effect against IBD development. Conclusions: Age, anxiety and living in urban areas pose a risk of suffering from IBD, as does the excessive consumption of certain macronutrients. However, the consumption of fibre has a protective effect on the development of some IBD types.

1. Introduction

IBDs are a group of gastrointestinal diseases, including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) [1,2]. IBDs are pathologies involving alternating episodes of clinical activity and phases of inactivity or clinical remission [1,3]. The symptoms of IBDs include fever, diarrhoea, abdominal pain and rectal bleeding, among others [3]. Although the clinical manifestations of CD and UC are similar, there are differences in the distribution of intestinal inflammation between CD and UC [3]. For example, in CD, inflamed intestinal areas are discontinuous, and these areas of inflammation may occur in any part of the digestive tract. In contrast, in UC, the inflammation tends to be continuous and is limited to the colon [3].
IBDs tend to occur in young people, with 25% of patients being diagnosed before 18 years of age [4]. In addition, it is estimated that in areas such as North America and Europe, more than 1.5 and 2 million people, respectively, suffer from IBDs [5]. The total incidence and prevalence of IBDs in Europe is 725 and 28.6 cases per 100,000 inhabitants, respectively [6]. The incidence and prevalence of CD are 20.2 and 322 cases per 100,000 people, respectively, whereas the incidence and prevalence of UC are 24.3 and 505 cases per 100,000 inhabitants, respectively [5].
CD and UC are idiopathic pathologies for which the aetiology is unknown [7]. However, genetic, immunological and environmental factors play fundamental roles in the development of IBDs [7,8]. Among the genetic factors, mutations in 215 genes have been found to increase the risk of developing IBDs [9]. Some loci, such as IL23R, JAK2 or STAT3, are common for both diseases, whereas others are specific to CD (NOD2 and ATG16L1) and UC (IL10, IL22 or IFN-γ) [10,11]. Immunological factors associated with IBDs include alterations in the function of regulatory T cells and pathways involving molecules such as IL-1β or IL-17 [12,13]. With respect to environmental risk factors, the most recent literature emphasises that nutritional habits, exposure to common drugs such as tobacco or alcohol, the use of antibiotics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and emotional factors such as anxiety or depression are associated with IBD development [14,15,16,17,18].
The gut microbiome plays a crucial role in the pathophysiology of IBDs [19]. Compared with healthy individuals, IBD patients have a lower diversity of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Eubacterium rectale and a lower concentration of metabolites, such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), among others, but a greater diversity of species such as Escherichia coli, Actinomyces, and Ruminococcus, among others [19,20,21].
In terms of environmental factors, it should be noted that the consumption of fibre in the diet has a preventive effect on the development of IBDs in healthy subjects [14]. Additionally, the consumption of fibre in subjects with CD without intestinal stenosis is effective in conjunction with biological therapies at the time of pathological remission [22]. With digestive diseases such as IBD, nutrition should be a fundamental pillar of their prevention and management [14,17,22,23]. The influence of diet could be due to the ability of the diet to modulate the intestinal microbiome, preventing or promoting imbalances between microbial species [24,25].
In contrast, tobacco use influences the risk of developing IBDs [26]. The underlying mechanism by which this phenomenon occurs is unknown; however, the ability of tobacco to alter the microbiome could be directly related to this phenomenon [27]. Interestingly, it should be noted that tobacco use acts as a protective factor against flare-ups in patients with UC [26,28]. Individuals who consume alcohol have been found to have an intestinal microbiome similar to that of IBD patients; therefore, alcohol consumption could be a risk factor for the development of IBDs [29].
Antibiotic use has been associated with IBD development [16,17]. As with the previously described examples, this phenomenon could be due to the alteration of the intestinal microbiome of healthy subjects [21]; this effect is dependent on the antibiotic and the dose consumed by the subjects [17]. In addition, in the case of NSAIDs, alterations in microbial diversity at the intestinal level are known [30]. Notably, because the mechanism of action of NSAIDs involves the inhibition of the enzyme cyclooxygenase 1 (COX-1), NSAID consumption promotes digestive ulcers and has been associated with IBD flare-ups [18].
Among emotional factors, both depression and anxiety are psychiatric disorders associated with IBD development in predisposed populations [31]. This association could be related to the gut–brain–microbiota axis, known as the bidirectional connection of the gut with the central nervous system, thus linking factors such as anxiety and depression to intestinal inflammation [32,33]. The presence of these psychiatric disorders is related to the production of substances such as IL-6, among other inflammatory mediators [34,35,36]. In addition, anxiety can trigger the activation of type 17 T helper (Th17) cells [34].
Regarding the prevention of IBDs, environmental factors have special relevance since they are modifiable through good health habits [14]. As mentioned above, adequate fibre consumption has a protective effect against IBD development. In addition, all the environmental factors described above are connected in that they can all produce imbalances in intestinal microbiota diversity [19,20,21,27,30,32,37]. However, for some habits, such as alcohol consumption, doubts about its possible role in the risk of IBD development persist [38], whereas NSAID use is associated with the occurrence of relapses. Nevertheless, the role of NSAID use in CD and UC development is still uncertain [18]. Psychiatric factors are more common in patients with IBDs, but the role of these factors in the development of these pathologies is not clear [39,40]. Notably, IBDs pose a significant burden on public health in European countries [41,42]. This burden is due to increased cases throughout Europe, especially in countries with greater industrialization [41,43].
Therefore, the objective of this study was to analyse health habits and environmental factor exposures among a group of individuals with IBDs (before diagnosis) and healthy controls to identify possible risk factors for IBD development.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

A cross-sectional case–control study was carried out according to Strengthening the Reporting of Observation studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist guidelines [44].

2.2. Participants and Sample Size

The study sample included Spanish individuals who were older than 18 years, including those with IBDs and healthy controls. The data were collected between June 2023 and January 2024.
Patients with IBDs were included in the case group. Criteria for inclusion in the case group were as follows: (1) a diagnosis of an IBD, (2) disease in clinical remission and (3) age over 18 years. The case group exclusion criterion was the inability to communicate through information and communication technologies (ICTs).
Criteria for inclusion in the control group were (1) healthy status, (2) access to ICTs (3) and age over 18 years. The control group exclusion criterion was a diagnosis of a gastrointestinal pathology other than IBDs.
The GRANMO program (Version 7.12 April 2012) was used to calculate the sample size. In a case-control study carried out in Japan by Sakamoto N et al. in 2005 [45], including 108 patients with UC, 126 patients with CD and 211 controls, a greater risk of UC was associated with carbohydrate and sweetener consumption (odds ratio (OR) = 2.12; 95% CI: 1.08 to 4.17). Therefore, with an accepted alpha value of 0.05 and a beta value of 0.2 for a bilateral research design, for this study, 143 cases and 143 controls were required to detect a minimum OR of 2.12. The rate of exposure in the control group was assumed to be 0.5. In addition, a loss to follow-up rate of 10% was estimated, and the POISSON approach was used.

2.3. Variables

Sociodemographic variables: These variables included age, sex, marital status, educational level, profession, social class and place of residence.
Condition of interest: All the subjects who completed the form were asked to indicate whether they had suffered from an IBD. In this way, each participant was categorised as a case or a control depending on whether they suffered from an IBD.
Descriptive variables for cases of IBD: For the group of cases only, information on the type of IBD, need, medication for the disease, and adherence to pharmacological treatment were collected.
Variables related to health habits and nutrient consumption: Data on health habits, the need for medication and emotional disorders were collected 12 months before the diagnosis of IBD in the case group and 12 months before the survey was completed in the control group. Information was collected regarding the daily consumption of calories, carbohydrates, fats, proteins and fibre. In addition, information on alcohol and tobacco consumption (with smoking status based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria) [46], antibiotic and NSAID use, alcohol dependence, number of cigarettes smoked daily and types of antibiotics and NSAIDs consumed were collected. Self-perceived anxiety and depression were also analysed.
Variables related to quality of life: Data concerning subject-perceived quality of life were collected.

2.4. Instruments

The following tools were used for the collection and expression of data for the different study variables.
  • Alcohol consumption
The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) was used to evaluate alcohol consumption [47]. This questionnaire consists of 10 multiple-choice items. The subjects were classified according to their risk of alcohol addiction based on their AUDIT score. Low, medium, high and probable addiction risk was assigned to subjects with scores of 0–7, 8–15, 16–19 and 20–40, respectively.
  • Anxiety and depression
The Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Scale was used to evaluate anxiety and depression [48]. This scale is composed of a subscale for anxiety and another for depression. The cut-off scores were four affirmative responses for the anxiety subscale and two for the depression subscale, with higher scores indicating a greater risk of anxiety and depression, respectively.
  • Macronutrient intake
A Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) was used to calculate differences in the consumption of macronutrients. The values of macronutrients consumed daily were calculated based on participant responses in a manner similar to previous studies [49,50].
  • Quality of life
The WHO Quality of Life Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire, which is a simplified version of the 26-item WHOQOL-100 questionnaire, was used to assess the quality of life [51]. This questionnaire does not have cut-off points; higher scores indicate higher subject quality of life. The WHOQOL-BREF is composed of 4 domains (physical, psychological, social and environmental) that are evaluated separately, with a score obtained for each domain and a total score comprising the sum of scores for the 26 items. Items 3, 4 and 26 are reverse-scored.
  • Adherence to pharmacological treatment
The Morisky–Green questionnaire was used to analyse pharmacological treatment adherence among subjects with IBD [52]. This questionnaire consists of four items. Patient treatment adherence is considered when the responses to the four items are No, Yes, No and No.

2.5. Data Collection

A questionnaire was disseminated online. This survey was designed via the Microsoft Forms tool and was accompanied by an information sheet and an informed consent form. Once the online informed consent form was read and signed, the subjects were allowed to continue and complete the survey.
To recruit subjects for the case group, the questionnaire was disseminated throughout the Spanish territory through patient associations such as the Association of Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis Patients (ACCU) and its different sections in autonomous communities and provinces, the Asociación Cordobesa de Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal (ACEII) and the Asociación Socio Sanitaria de Enfermedades Inflamatorias Intestinales (ASSEII).
On the other hand, to recruit subjects for the control group, the questionnaire was disseminated via IMCU’s social media across the entire country. Thus, individuals interested in participating could do so by responding to the questions.

2.6. Ethical Considerations

The study was approved by the Social Research Ethics Committee (SREC) of the University of Castilla-La Mancha with protocol code CEIS-694878-S2S2, approval date 11 April 2023. All the participants read the information sheet and provided their consent to participate in the study by completing the disseminated survey.

2.7. Data Analysis

For the analysis of the data, SPSS version 29, obtained through a UCLM licence, was used. Qualitative variables are presented as counts (n) and percentages (%). Quantitative variables are presented as arithmetic means (m) and standard deviations (SD).
The categorical variables were compared via the chi-square test and are presented in contingency tables. In addition, a Pearson correlation analysis of the scores of the different tools administered in the survey and the nutritional values was performed. Logistic regression analysis was subsequently carried out to identify the possible factors associated with IBD development.
Participants were classified as cases or controls based on whether they suffered from an IBD.
All tests were two-tailed, and results within a 95% confidence interval, assuming an alpha error of p < 0.05, were considered significant.

3. Results

Initially, 371 subjects responded to the survey; however, 59 cases were excluded because of errors in completing the questionnaire. Therefore, the final sample included 312 subjects: 167 subjects in the case group of individuals suffering from IBDs (95 with CD and 72 with UC) and 145 subjects in the control group. Figure 1 shows the participant selection process. Most respondents were women (66 vs. 34%), and the mean age of the participants was 41.11 years (SD ± 14.02). Among the total sample, most of the subjects were married (47.8%), had completed university studies (37.8%) and lived in an urban environment (55.1%). Table 1 shows the sociodemographic characteristics of both groups. Furthermore, Table 2 presents the differences in lifestyle among participants.
Among the participants, 53.5% had some type of IBD, whereas 46.5% were healthy controls. Among the subjects with IBDs, 56.9% had CD, and 43.1% had UC. Most of the subjects with IBDs required medication at the time of the study (88%), the most common being biological therapies (53.9%). The descriptive characteristics of the patients with IBDs are presented in Table 3.

3.1. Risk Factors for IBD

Regarding risk factors (Table 2), significant between-group differences (p < 0.001) were found in terms of tobacco consumption, with 21.6% and 17.2% of cases and controls reporting that they smoked, respectively. In addition, 29.3% of cases were former smokers, whereas 11.8% of controls were former smokers. The mean WHOQOL-BREF score prior to diagnosis was lower in the case group than the control group, with scores of 85.64 (±17.52 SD) and 90.84 (±14.51 SD), respectively (p = 0.004).
Significant between-group differences were found for self-perceived anxiety and depression, with 110 subjects with IBD with self-perceived anxiety vs. 58 without self-perceived anxiety (p < 0.001) and 110 subjects with IBD with self-perceived depression vs. 73 without self-perceived depression (p = 0.005). The mean scores for both subscales were significantly different, with mean values of 4.8 ± 2.99 vs. 3.04 ± 2.76 for the anxiety subscale and 3.61 ± 2.84 vs. 2.16 ± 2.28 for the depression subscale for the case vs. control groups.
In addition, significant differences were also found in terms of the consumption of macronutrients, including calories, carbohydrates and total fats, between the IBD group and healthy subjects (Table 4). Additionally, subjects with IBD consumed lower amounts of fibre prior to diagnosis.
No statistically significant differences between groups were found regarding the use of antibiotics, NSAIDs, alcohol or tobacco. Additionally, no differences were found between subgroups when the different risk factors were analysed. These factors were common for CD and UC patients in the present study.

3.2. Descriptive Differences between Subgroups

When each IBD type was analysed separately, several statistically significant differences were found. Among these differences, patients who did not need medication were more likely to have CD than UC (18.9 vs. 2.8%). In addition, the need for aminosalicylates was greater in patients with UC, whereas the use of biological therapies was more common in the subgroup of patients with CD.
On the other hand, adherence to treatment did not significantly differ between subgroups, with 66.3% and 62.5% of patients with CD and patients with UC adhering to treatment, respectively, and 33.7% and 37.5% of patients with CD and patients with UC not adhering to treatment, respectively.

3.3. Bivariate Correlations between Risk Factors

Table 5 shows the correlations between the different risk factors for the present study, expressed as the means ± SDs. Positive and significant correlations were found between the anxiety and depression subscale scores and between total calorie consumption and the consumption of various macronutrients.
On the other hand, negative and significant correlations were found between Goldman’s anxiety and depression subscale scores and WHOQOL-BREF scores and the consumption of fibre in the diet, as well as the amount of carbohydrates and fibre consumed in the diet.

3.4. Logistic Regression

Table 6 shows the ORs of the factors associated with the development of IBDs. According to the multiple logistic regression model, the statistically significant variables related to IBD development were living in an urban environment (OR = 3.877) and self-perceived anxiety (OR = 3.039).
Similarly, people who were diagnosed with an IBD had greater daily carbohydrate consumption (OR = 1.039, p = 0.047) and lower total daily fibre consumption (OR = 0.921, p = 0.002).

4. Discussion

The results of this research revealed that certain habits (e.g., smoking) and mental disorders (e.g., anxiety and depression) were more common in patients with IBDs prior to their diagnosis than in healthy controls. At the nutritional level, the case group consumed more calories, lipids, carbohydrates, and less fibre than the control group. In addition, living in a rural environment seems to have a preventive role in the development of these pathologies.
A previous study revealed that rural housing was a protective factor against IBDs [53]. Specifically, a case-control study carried out in a paediatric Asian sample [53] found that living in a rural environment was a protective factor against IBDs, whereas, in the present study, an OR of developing an IBD of 3.877 was obtained for living in an urban area. Additionally, differences in the quality of the diet and the cost of food have been reported between urban and rural areas, with the consumption of processed foods, sugar and saturated fats being greater in urban areas and the consumption of wholegrain products and legumes being greater in rural areas [54]. Moreover, a study demonstrated that the consumption of ultra-processed food and oxidative stress were higher in patients with IBD, with a positive and statistically significant correlation between these variables [55]. Another study [56], in contrast to the present study, did not find differences between the quality of the diet in individuals living in the two different environments; however, the study did find differences in nutritional habits due to other factors, such as age, the presence of chronic diseases or living alone. In addition, several studies have shown that fibre consumption is a protective factor against IBDs [45,57]. Specifically, a case-control study [57] found that fibre consumption was a more significant protective factor than the present study. However, another multicentre case-control study [45] revealed that the daily consumption of foods rich in fibre had a protective effect, similar to the results of the present work. The protective effect of fibre against IBD may be due to its role as a substrate for the microbiota, which synthesizes SCFAs that have anti-inflammatory effects and regulate mucosal immunity [19]. Additionally, SCFA levels are lower in individuals with IBD compared to healthy populations [58]. According to the results of the present study and those of another study, the excessive consumption of fats constitutes a risk factor for suffering from IBDs [57]. Protein consumption was found to be a protective factor for IBD development, with an OR of 0.866 [57]. However, the results from the multicentre study mentioned above [45], in accordance with the results of the present study, revealed that consuming foods rich in protein was a risk factor for IBD development. The excessive consumption of carbohydrates was found to be a risk factor for suffering from CD and UC [59], which is consistent with the results of the present study.
Disorders such as anxiety or depression are common in patients with IBDs before their diagnosis [60,61,62]. When comparing the results of the present study with those of other studies [60,62], anxiety was found to be an important risk factor. Depression was not found to be a risk factor in the logistic regression; however, depression was more common in the case group than in the control group in the present study. This finding is in accordance with the results of other investigations [60,61,62,63] in which the presence of depression was also common among subjects with IBDs. Notably, both anxiety and depression may be present before IBD diagnosis and may persist years later [60]. The relationship between these disorders before and after IBD diagnosis could be because both depression and anxiety are related to the production of inflammatory mediators [34,35,36], which are also associated with a sedentary lifestyle and an increased incidence of IBDs [64]. Both anxiety and depression are inversely correlated with physical activity [65,66], which indicates that those individuals with less physical activity have a greater risk of suffering from IBDs, anxiety and depression [64,65,66]. Additionally, a case–control study demonstrated that individuals who engaged in daily physical activity had a lower risk of developing IBD, with an OR of 0.58, which was statistically significant. This finding indicates that physical activity acts as a protective factor against these conditions [67].
The results of the present study revealed that both anxiety and depression were significantly inversely correlated with quality of life, which was also reported in another study [68]. This study additionally found correlations between IBD symptoms and anxiety, depression and quality of life [68]. In the present study, subjects in the case group perceived a lower quality of life than subjects in the control group. Quality of life is often compromised in people already diagnosed with some type of IBD [68,69,70]. However, to our knowledge, no studies have analysed quality of life prior to IBD diagnosis. From the perspective of the present study sample, although the case group comprised patients not yet diagnosed with an IBD, these individuals already presented symptoms of their disease, which may have decreased their quality of life.
The present study also revealed that the rate of antibiotic use in the case group was slightly greater than that in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant. This result is similar to the results of a previous study [53] in which the number of IBD patients who consumed antibiotics was greater than the number of healthy controls who used antibiotics. Interestingly, the need for antibiotics is increased in other situations, such as gastrointestinal infections, which are also associated with an increased IBD risk [71]. The rate of NSAID use in the present study was lower in the case group; by contrast, a cohort study [72] revealed that those people who consumed NSAIDs more than 15 days a month had an age-adjusted OR of 1.60 for CD and 1.95 for UC. However, the methodology and patient recruitment used in the present study were different from those used in this study, in which a sample of exclusively female nurses was evaluated. In addition, this difference can also be explained by the fact that the consumption of NSAIDs is very widespread among the general population and is more common among women [73].
When comparing data on tobacco use, some observational studies obtained results similar to those of the present study, with tobacco use being a risk factor for IBD development [74,75,76]. In addition, the risk of UC was found to be higher in former smokers [76]. This finding indicates that tobacco use influences the risk of UC development in a healthy population [74,75,76]; however, tobacco use has been found to prevent flare-ups in patients who have already been diagnosed with an IBD [76].
With respect to alcohol consumption, the present study did not find significant differences in alcohol consumption between the case and control groups. This finding coincides with that of a prospective investigation that did not find a relationship between alcohol consumption and the risk of suffering from IBDs [77]. However, another study reported an OR of IBD development of 1.545 for subjects who consumed alcohol [78]. Although alcohol is harmful to the digestive tract [37], in other cases, in the context of suffering from an IBD [29], it is difficult to find associations between alcohol consumption in a healthy population and the risk of developing CD or UC. This lack of an association could be because, like other factors, such as taking NSAIDs, alcohol consumption is a widespread practice in developed countries [79], which makes it difficult to find differences between groups and makes it necessary to recruit a greater number of subjects. Notably, the study that found differences recruited a sample of 458,109 subjects [78], whereas the study that found no differences included 121,701 participants [77].
In addition to the symptoms associated with the presence of IBD and its consequences for the quality of life of the subjects [3,69], the increase in cases of IBDs in industrialised areas is becoming a public health concern in Western countries [41,42,43]. This concern is related to the high demand for pharmacological treatments and health care in Western patients [41,80]. In this context, the prevention of new IBD cases becomes a necessity. Healthcare personnel play a fundamental role in the care and prevention of IBDs; therefore, it is important for these personnel to know the risk factors associated with the development of these pathologies.

Limitations and Strengths

Among the limitations of the present study was that the questionnaire used for data collection was self-administered. The subject-reported consumption of calories and macronutrients might not reflect their real consumption. Because the main objective of the study was to observe the differences between case and control groups, the complete FFQ was not used. We found that fibre consumption is a preventive factor for IBD; however, this study did not analyse the differences between various types of fibre (fermentable vs. non-fermentable), so it would be interesting to investigate this in future studies. Additionally, since the questionnaire was administered through patient associations, it was not possible to match cases with controls. Since cases described their habits before diagnosis, recall difficulties may introduce bias. The habits of the cases may have changed with the onset of symptoms before diagnosis. To mitigate this confounding factor, we asked cases about their habits from one year prior to diagnosis and employed a standardized questionnaire consistent with practices in previous articles [81,82]. Furthermore, owing to the cross-sectional case–control design of the present investigation, it is not possible to determine the direction of the associations obtained between the different variables.
As strengths, it should be noted that a sufficient sample size was recruited to ensure the validity and reliability of the results, and the questionnaire was completed by individuals throughout the national territory. Another strength of this study is the use of a standardized questionnaire that incorporated validated tools. Furthermore, because subjects with IBDs had to answer the questionnaire from their own perspective before being diagnosed with an IBD, the risk factors studied and reflected in this study were not modified by the presence of these pathologies.

5. Conclusions

Among the factors studied, age, anxiety and living in an urban environment pose a risk of suffering from IBDs, as does the excessive consumption of certain macronutrients (fats, proteins and carbohydrates), whereas the consumption of fibre seems to have a protective effect on the development of CD or UC. Additionally, although no significant differences were found, a greater proportion of people with IBDs were smokers and more subjects with IBDs used antibiotics.
Given that IBDs begin in the digestive system, proper nutrition should be one of the fundamental pillars of both prevention and care in managing these diseases. In addition, it is important to pay attention to mental health since anxiety was found to be a risk factor for IBD development and to be correlated with depression, considering that the presence of anxiety can lead to depression and vice versa. In addition, both anxiety and depression were correlated with a lower quality of life, with this quality of life being lower in patients with IBDs than in healthy subjects. Therefore, in addition to focusing on nutritional factors when preventing IBDs in a healthy population, other factors, such as psychiatric factors and the environment in which the individual lives, must be considered. Knowing these high-risk factors for IBDs is essential for health policy-makers so that they can take these factors into consideration when developing prevention and awareness campaigns.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.S.-F., J.A.L.-A. and J.M.C.-T.; methodology, V.S.-F., J.A.L.-A., J.M.C.-T. and A.L.-F.-R.; software, J.A.L.-A. and J.M.C.-T.; validation, V.S.-F., J.A.L.-A., C.N.-T., A.L.-F.-R., B.M.-G. and J.M.C.-T.; formal analysis, V.S.-F., J.A.L.-A., J.M.C.-T. and C.N.-T.; investigation, V.S.-F., J.A.L.-A., A.L.-F.-R. and B.M.-G.; resources, J.M.C.-T.; data curation, V.S.-F. and A.L.-F.-R.; writing—original draft preparation, V.S.-F., A.L.-F.-R. and B.M.-G.; writing—review and editing, V.S.-F., J.A.L.-A., J.M.C.-T. and C.N.-T.; visualization, J.A.L.-A.; supervision, J.A.L.-A. and J.M.C.-T.; project administration, V.S.-F., J.A.L.-A. and J.M.C.-T.; funding acquisition, J.M.C.-T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by FEDER-UCLM, grant number UCLM 2022. The APC was funded by FEDER UCLM.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Social Research Ethics Committee (SREC) of the University of Castilla-La Mancha (protocol code CEIS-694878-S2S2, 11 April 2023).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Written informed consent has been obtained from the patients to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

All datasets employed and/or analysed in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We express our gratitude to ACCU España and its regional divisions, as well as to ACEII and ASSEII, for their support in promoting the study. We also thank all the individuals who participated in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Nasr, S.; Dahmani, W.; Jaziri, H.; Hammami, A.; Slama, A.B.; Ameur, W.B.; Elleuch, N.; Mahdi, K.; Ali, J. Exploring work productivity loss in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Future Sci. OA 2023, 9, FSO872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Figueroa, C. Epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease. Rev. Medica Clin. Las. Condes 2019, 30, 257–261. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gompertz, M.; Sedano, R. Clinical and endoscopic manifestations in inflammatory bowel disease. Rev. Medica Clin. Las. Condes 2019, 30, 273–282. [Google Scholar]
  4. Östensson, M.; Björkqvist, O.; Guo, A.; Størdal, K.; Halfvarson, J.; Mårild, K.; Ludvigsson, J. Epidemiology, validation, and clinical characteristics of inflammatory bowel disease: The ABIS birth cohort study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2023, 23, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ng, S.C.; Shi, H.Y.; Hamidi, N.; Underwood, F.E.; Tang, W.; Benchimol, E.I.; Panaccione, R.; Ghosh, S.; Justin Wu, C.Y.; Francis Chan, K.L.; et al. Worldwide incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease in the 21st century: A systematic review of population-based studies. Lancet 2017, 390, 2769–2778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Pasvol, T.J.; Horsfall, L.; Bloom, S.; Segal, A.W.; Sabin, C.; Field, N.; Rait, G. Incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease in UK primary care: A population-based cohort study. BMJ Open 2020, 10, e036584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mukherjee, T.; Kumar, N.; Chawla, M.; Philpott, D.J.; Basak, S. The NF-κB signaling system in the immunopathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Sci. Signal 2024, 17, eadh1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tian, Q.B.; Chen, S.J.; Xiao, L.J.; Xie, J.Q.; Zhao, H.B.; Zhang, X. Potential effects of nutrition-induced alteration of gut microbiota on inflammatory bowel disease: A review. J. Dig. Dis. 2024, 25, 78–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. De Lange, K.M.; Moutsianas, L.; Lee, J.C.; Lamb, C.A.; Luo, Y.; Kennedy, N.A.; Jostins, L.; Rice, L.D.; Gutierrez-Achury, J.; Sun-Gou, J.; et al. Genome-wide association study implicates immune activation of multiple integrin genes in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat. Genet. 2017, 49, 256–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Iborra, M.; Beltrán, B.; Nos, P. Nuevos conocimientos en genética y enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal. ¿alguna utilidad práctica? Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2011, 34, 591–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Guan, Q. A Comprehensive Review and Update on the Pathogenesis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J. Immunol. Res. 2019, 2019, 7247238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Chen, K.; Gu, X.; Yang, S.; Tao, R.; Fan, M.; Bao, W.; Wang, X. Research progress on intestinal tissue-resident memory T cells in inflammatory bowel disease. Scand. J. Immunol. 2023, 98, e13332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sekiya, T.; Hidano, S.; Takaki, S. Tonic TCR and IL-1β signaling mediate phenotypic alterations of naive CD4+ T cells. Cell Rep. 2024, 43, 113954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Singh, N.; Bernstein, C.N. Environmental risk factors for inflammatory bowel disease. United Eur. Gastroenterol. J. 2022, 10, 1047–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Piovani, D.; Danese, S.; Peyrin-Biroulet, L.; Nikolopoulos, G.K.; Lytras, T.; Bonovas, S. Environmental Risk Factors for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: An Umbrella Review of Meta-analyses. Gastroenterology 2019, 157, 647–659.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Fenneman, A.C.; Weidner, M.; Chen, L.A.; Nieuwdorp, M.; Blaser, M.J. Antibiotics in the pathogenesis of diabetes and inflammatory diseases of the gastrointestinal tract. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2023, 20, 81–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Faye, A.S.; Allin, K.H.; Iversen, A.T.; Agrawal, M.; Faith, J.; Colombel, J.F.; Jess, T. Antibiotic use as a risk factor for inflammatory bowel disease across the ages: A population-based cohort study. Gut 2023, 72, 663–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hijos-Mallada, G.; Sostres, C.; Gomollón, F. NSAIDs, gastrointestinal toxicity and inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022, 45, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Qiu, P.; Ishimoto, T.; Fu, L.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, Y. The Gut Microbiota in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hu, Y.; Chen, Z.; Xu, C.; Kan, S.; Chen, D. Disturbances of the Gut Microbiota and Microbiota-Derived Metabolites in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Nutrients 2022, 14, 5140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Karakan, T.; Ozkul, C.; Akkol, E.K.; Bilici, S.; Sobarzo-Sánchez, E.; Capasso, R. Gut-brain-microbiota axis: Antibiotics and functional gastrointestinal disorders. Nutrients 2021, 13, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Serrano Fernandez, V.; Seldas Palomino, M.; Laredo-Aguilera, J.A.; Pozuelo-Carrascosa, D.P.; Carmona-Torres, J.M. High-Fiber Diet and Crohn’s Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients 2023, 15, 3114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Adolph, T.E.; Meyer, M.; Schwärzler, J.; Mayr, L.; Grabherr, F.; Tilg, H. The metabolic nature of inflammatory bowel diseases. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022, 19, 753–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Malesza, I.J.; Malesza, M.; Walkowiak, J.; Mussin, N.; Walkowiak, D.; Aringazina, R.; Bartkowiak-Wieczorek, J.; Mądry, E. High-fat, western-style diet, systemic inflammation, and gut microbiota: A narrative review. Cells 2021, 10, 3164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Beam, A.; Clinger, E.; Hao, L. Effect of diet and dietary components on the composition of the gut microbiota. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Glassner, K.L.; Abraham, B.P.; Quigley, E.M.M. The microbiome and inflammatory bowel disease. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020, 145, 16–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Fan, J.; Zhou, Y.; Meng, R.; Tang, J.; Zhu, J.; Aldrich, M.C.; Cox, N.J.; Zhu, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhou, D. Cross-talks between gut microbiota and tobacco smoking: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study. BMC Med. 2023, 21, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Blackwell, J.; Saxena, S.; Alexakis, C.; Bottle, A.; Cecil, E.; Majeed, A.; Pollok, R.C. The impact of smoking and smoking cessation on disease outcomes in ulcerative colitis: A nationwide population-based study. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2019, 50, 556–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ramos, G.P.; Kane, S. Alcohol Use in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 17, 211. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zádori, Z.S.; Király, K.; Al-Khrasani, M.; Gyires, K. Interactions between NSAIDs, opioids and the gut microbiota—Future perspectives in the management of inflammation and pain. Pharmacol. Ther. 2023, 241, 108327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bisgaard, T.H.; Allin, K.H.; Elmahdi, R.; Jess, T. The bidirectional risk of inflammatory bowel disease and anxiety or depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry 2023, 83, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Simpson, C.A.; Diaz-Arteche, C.; Eliby, D.; Schwartz, O.S.; Simmons, J.G.; Cowan, C.S.M. The gut microbiota in anxiety and depression—A systematic review. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2021, 83, 101943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Banfi, D.; Moro, E.; Bosi, A.; Bistoletti, M.; Cerantola, S.; Crema, F.; Maggi, F.; Giron, M.C.; Giaroni, C.; Baj, A. Impact of microbial metabolites on microbiota–gut–brain axis in inflammatory bowel disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Beurel, E.; Toups, M.; Nemeroff, C.B. The Bidirectional Relationship of Depression and Inflammation: Double Trouble. Neuron 2020, 107, 234–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Osimo, E.F.; Pillinger, T.; Rodriguez, I.M.; Khandaker, G.M.; Pariante, C.M.; Howes, O.D. Inflammatory markers in depression: A meta-analysis of mean differences and variability in 5166 patients and 5083 controls. Brain Behav. Immun. 2020, 87, 901–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Renna, M.E.; O’Toole, M.S.; Spaeth, P.E.; Lekander, M.; Mennin, D.S. The association between anxiety, traumatic stress, and obsessive–compulsive disorders and chronic inflammation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Depress. Anxiety 2018, 35, 1081–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Gupta, H.; Suk, K.T.; Kim, D.J. Gut microbiota at the intersection of alcohol, brain, and the liver. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Sun, Y.; Yuan, S.; Chen, X.; Sun, J.; Kalla, R.; Yu, L.; Wang, L.; Zhou, X.; Kong, X.; Hesketh, T.; et al. The Contribution of Genetic Risk and Lifestyle Factors in the Development of Adult-Onset Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2023, 118, 511–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ge, L.; Liu, S.; Li, S.; Yang, J.; Hu, G.; Xu, C.; Song, W. Psychological stress in inflammatory bowel disease: Psychoneuroimmunological insights into bidirectional gut–brain communications. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 1016578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rozich, J.J.; Holmer, A.; Singh, S. Effect of Lifestyle Factors on Outcomes in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2020, 115, 832–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Burisch, J.; Zhao, M.; Odes, S.; De Cruz, P.; Vermeire, S.; Bernstein, C.N.; Kaplan, G.G.; Duricova, D.; Greenberg, D.; Melberg, H.O.; et al. The cost of inflammatory bowel disease in high-income settings: A Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology Commission. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2023, 8, 458–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dovizio, M.; Hartz, S.; Buzzoni, C.; Redondo, I.; Nedeljkovic Protic, M.; Birra, D.; Perrone, V.; Veronesi, C.; Esposti, L.D.; Armuzzi, A. Real-World Treatment Patterns and Healthcare Resource Use for Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn’s Disease in Italy. Adv. Ther. 2024, 41, 2282–2298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kumar, A.; Yassin, N.; Marley, A.; Bellato, V.; Foppa, C.; Pellino, G.; Myrelid, P.; Millan, M.; Gros, B.; Avellaneda, N.; et al. Crossing barriers: The burden of inflammatory bowel disease across Western Europe. Ther. Adv. Gastroenterol. 2023, 16, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Von Elm, E.; Altman, D.G.; Egger, M.; Pocock, S.J.; Peter, G.C.; Vandenbroucke, J.P. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology [STROBE] Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies [Internet]. Epidemiology 2008, 18, 800–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sakamoto, N.; Kono, S.; Wakai, K.; Fukuda, Y.; Satomi, M.; Shimoyama, T.; Inaba, Y.; Miyake, Y.; Sasaki, S.; Okamoto, K.; et al. Dietary Risk Factors for Inflammatory Bowel Disease A Multicenter Case-Control Study in Japan [Internet]. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2005, 11, 154–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Londoño Pérez, C.; Rodríguez Rodríguez, I.; Andrés, C.; Díaz, G. Questionnaire to Classify the Level of Tobacco Consumption in Young People. Divers. Perspect. Psicol. 2011, 7, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Williams, N. The audit questionnaire. Occup. Med. 2014, 64, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Montón, C.; Pérez Echeverría, M.J.; Campos, R.; García Campayo, J.; Lobo, A. Anxiety scales and Goldberg’s depression: An efficient interview guide for the detection of psychologic distress. Aten. Primaria 1993, 12, 345–349. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  49. Goni Mateos, L.; Aray Miranda, M.; Martínez, A.H.; Cuervo Zapatel, M. Validation of a food groups frequency questionnaire based in an exchange system. Nutr. Hosp. 2016, 33, 1391–1399. [Google Scholar]
  50. Terán, Y.A.M.; Manzano, A.S.; Ortiz, S.B.; Ulloa, V.A.; Sandoval, V.; Fajardo, A.C.E.; Carpio-Arias, T.V. Development of Food Frequency Questionnaire for Ecuadorian Adults, cross-sectional study. Rev. Esp. Nutr. Humana Diet. 2021, 25, 394–402. [Google Scholar]
  51. Whoqol Group, T. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment. Psychol. Med. 1998, 28, 551–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ben, A.J.; Rolim, C.; Sotero, N.; Mengue, S.; Neumann, C.R. The Brief Medication Questionnaire and Morisky-Green Test to Evaluate Medication Adherence [Internet]. Rev. Saude Publ. 2012, 46, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lee, W.S.; Song, Z.L.; Wong, S.Y.; Gan, C.W.; Koay, Z.L.; Em, J.M.; Chong, S.Y.; Lim, C.B.; Wong, S.Y.; Chew, K.S.; et al. Environmental risk factors for inflammatory bowel disease: A case control study in Southeast Asian children. J. Paediatr. Child. Health 2021, 58, 782–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Curi-Quinto, K.; Unar-Munguía, M.; Rodríguez-Ramírez, S.; Röös, E.; Willett, W.C.; Rivera, J.A. Diet cost and quality using the Healthy Eating Index-2015 in adults from urban and rural areas of Mexico. Public Health Nutr. 2022, 25, 2554–2565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Severo, J.S.; da Silva Barros, V.J.; Moraes Mendes, P.H.; dos Santos, B.L.B.; da Silva, A.C.A.; de Oliveira, K.B.V.; Bezerra de Moura, M.S.; de Almeida Fonseca Viola, P.C.; do Nascimiento Nogeira, N.; Luz Parente, J.M.; et al. Phase angle values and ultra-processed food consumption are associated with changes in oxidative stress in inflammatory bowel disease patients. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 2023, 57, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Pullen, R.; Kent, K.; Sharman, M.J.; Schumacher, T.L.; Brown, L.J. A comparison of diet quality in a sample of rural and urban australian adults. Nutrients 2021, 13, 4130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Riahi, R.; Abdi, S.; Ashtari, S.; Malekpour, H. Evaluating the influence of environmental risk factors on inflammatory bowel diseases: A case-control study. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Bed Bench 2023, 16, 307–318. [Google Scholar]
  58. Zhuang, X.; Li, T.; Li, M.; Huang, S.; Qiu, Y.; Feng, R.; Zhang, S.; Chen, M.; Xiong, L.; Zeng, Z. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Short-Chain Fatty Acid Characterization in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2019, 25, 1751–1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chan, S.S.M.; Luben, R.; Van Schaik, F.; Oldenburg, B.; Bueno-De-Mesquita, H.B.; Hallmans, G.; Karling, P.; Lindgren, S.; Grip, O.; Key, T.; et al. Carbohydrate intake in the etiology of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2014, 20, 2013–2021. [Google Scholar]
  60. Bisgaard, T.H.; Poulsen, G.; Allin, K.H.; Keefer, L.; Ananthakrishnan, A.N.; Jess, T. Longitudinal Trajectories of Anxiety, Depression, and Bipolar Disorder in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Population-Based Cohort Study [Internet]. EClinicalMedicine 2023, 59, 101986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Blackwell, J.; Saxena, S.; Petersen, I.; Hotopf, M.; Creese, H.; Bottle, A.; Alexakis, C.; Pollok, R.C. Depression in individuals who subsequently develop inflammatory bowel disease: A population-based nested case-control study. Gut 2021, 70, 1642–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Umar, N.; King, D.; Chandan, J.S.; Bhala, N.; Nirantharakumar, K.; Adderley, N.; Zemedikun, D.T.; Harvey, P.; Trudgill, N. The association between inflammatory bowel disease and mental ill health: A retrospective cohort study using data from UK primary care. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2022, 56, 814–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Schoultz, M.; Beattie, M.; Gorely, T.; Leung, J. Assessment of causal link between psychological factors and symptom exacerbation in inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review utilising Bradford Hill criteria and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Syst. Rev. 2020, 9, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wang, Q.; Xu, K.Q.; Qin, X.R.; Wen-Lu Yan-Liu Wang, X.Y. Association between physical activity and inflammatory bowel disease risk: A meta-analysis. Dig. Liver Dis. 2016, 48, 1425–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Philippot, A.; Dubois, V.; Lambrechts, K.; Grogna, D.; Robert, A.; Jonckheer, U.; Chakib, W.; Beine, A.; Bleyenheuft, Y.; De Volder, A.G. Impact of physical exercise on depression and anxiety in adolescent inpatients: A randomized controlled trial. J. Affect. Disord. 2022, 301, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Raman, M.; Rajagopalan, V.; Kaur, S.; Reimer, R.A.; Ma, C.; Ghosh, S. Vallance J. Physical Activity in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Narrative Review. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2022, 28, 1100–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Ng, S.C.; Tang, W.; Leong, R.W.; Chen, M.; Ko, Y.; Studd, C.; Niewiadomski, O.; Bell, S.; Kamm, M.A.; de Silva, H.J.; et al. Environmental risk factors in inflammatory bowel disease: A population-based case-control study in Asia-Pacific. Gut 2015, 64, 1063–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Yu, R.; Liu, C.; Zhang, J.; Li, J.; Tian, S.; Ding, F.; Liu, Z.; Wang, T.; Liu, Z.; Jiang, C.; et al. Correlation Analysis between Disease Activity and Anxiety, Depression, Sleep Disturbance, and Quality of Life in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Nat. Sci. Sleep 2023, 15, 407–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Habibi, F.; Habibi, M.E.; Gharavinia, A.; Mahdavi, S.B.; Akbarpour, M.J.; Baghaei, A.; Emami, M.H. Quality of life in inflammatory bowel disease patients: A cross-sectional study. J. Res. Med. Sci. 2017, 22, 104. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  70. López Cortés, R.; Marín Fernández, B.; Hueso Montoro, C.; Escalada Hernández, P.; Sanz Aznarez, A.C.; Rodríguez Gutiérrez, C. Calidad de vida relacionada con la salud en pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal. Sist. Sanit. Navar. 2016, 39, 123–131. [Google Scholar]
  71. Axelrad, J.E.; Olén, O.; Askling, J.; Lebwohl, B.; Khalili, H.; Sachs, M.C.; Ludvigsson, J.F. Gastrointestinal Infection Increases Odds of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in a Nationwide Case–Control Study. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 17, 1311–1322.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Ananthakrishnan, A.N.; Higuchi, L.M.; Huang, E.S.; Khalili, H.; Richter, J.M.; Fuchs, C.S.; Chan, A.T. Aspirin, Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug Use, and Risk for Crohn Disease and Ulcerative Colitis A Cohort Study [Internet]. Ann. Intern. Med. 2012, 156, 350–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Gómez-Acebo, I.; Dierssen-Sotos, T.; De Pedro, M.; Pérez-Gómez, B.; Castaño-Vinyals, G.; Fernández-Villa, T.; Palazuelos-Calderon, C.; Amiano, P.; Etxeberria, J.; Benavente, Y.; et al. Epidemiology of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs consumption in Spain. The MCC-Spain study. BMC Public Health 2018, 18, 1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Ananthakrishnan, A.N.; Nguyen, D.D.; Sauk, J.; Yajnik, V.; Xavier, R.J. Genetic polymorphisms in metabolizing enzymes modifying the association between smoking and inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2014, 20, 783–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zhang, H.; Kalla, R.; Chen, J.; Zhao, J.; Zhou, X.; Adams, A.; Noble, A.; Ventham, N.T.; Wellens, j.; Ho, G.T.; et al. Altered DNA methylation within DNMT3A, AHRR, LTA/TNF loci mediates the effect of smoking on inflammatory bowel disease. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Higuchi, L.M.; Khalili, H.; Chan, A.T.; Richter, J.M.; Bousvaros, A.; Fuchs, C.S. A prospective study of cigarette smoking and the risk of inflammatory bowel disease in women. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2012, 107, 1399–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Casey, K.; Lopes, E.W.; Niccum, B.; Burke, K.; Ananthakrishnan, A.N.; Lochhead, P.; Richter, J.M.; Chan, A.T.; Khalili, H. Alcohol consumption and risk of inflammatory bowel disease among three prospective US cohorts. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2022, 55, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Saadh, M.J.; Pal, R.S.; Arias-Gonzáles, J.L.; Orosco Gavilán, J.C.; Jc, D.; Mohany, M.; Al-Rejaie, S.S.; Bahrami, A.; Kadham, M.J.; Amin, A.H.; et al. A Mendelian Randomization Analysis Investigates Causal Associations between Inflammatory Bowel Diseases and Variable Risk Factors. Nutrients 2023, 15, 1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. İlhan, M.N.; Yapar, D. Alcohol consumption and alcohol policy. Turk. J. Med. Sci. 2020, 50, 1197–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Brunet-Mas, E.; Garcia-Sagué, B.; Vela, E.; Melcarne, L.; Llovet, L.P.; Pontes, C.; Garcia-Iglesias, P.; Puy, A.; Lario, S.; Ramirez-Lazaro, M.J.; et al. Economic impact of inflammatory bowel disease in Catalonia: A population-based analysis. Therap. Adv. Gastroenterol. 2024, 17, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Coughlin, S.S. Recall bias in epidemiologic studies. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1990, 43, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ortega, R.M.; Perez-Rodrigo, C.; Lopez-Sobaler, A.M. Métodos de evaluación de la ingesta actual: Registro o diario dietético. Nutr. Hosp. 2015, 31, 38–45. [Google Scholar]
Nutrients 16 02463 g001
Figure 1. Participant selection flow chart.
Figure 1. Participant selection flow chart.
Nutrients 16 02463 g001
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics.
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics.
VariableIBDp Value
Yes
n (%)		No
n (%)
Age (mean years ± SD)45.07 ± 13.1336.54 ± 13.66<0.001
Sex 0.512
Male54 (32.3)52 (35.9)
Female113 (67.7)93 (64.1)
Marital status 0.022
Single63 (37.7)80 (55.2)
Married92 (55.1)57 (39.3)
Divorced10 (6)7 (4.8)
Widower2 (1.2)1 (0.7)
Education level 0.267
None1 (0.7)1 (0.7)
Basic studies9 (5.4)14 (9.7)
Secondary studies68 (40.7)46 (31.7)
University studies89 (53.2)84 (57.9)
Profession <0.001
Health personnel42 (25.1)57 (39.3)
Administration63 (37.7)34 (23.4)
General services34 (20.4)25 (17.2)
Pensioner18 (10.8)4 (2.8)
Student7 (4.2)21 (14.5)
Unemployed3 (1.8)4 (2.8)
Social class 0.018
Class 117 (10.2)14 (9.7)
Class 221 (12.6)15 (10.3)
Class 327 (16.2)35 (24.1)
Class 454 (32.3)26 (17.9)
Class 536 (21.6)48 (33.1)
Class 612 (7.1)7 (4.9)
IBD—inflammatory bowel disease.
Table 2. Differences in Lifestyle.
Table 2. Differences in Lifestyle.
Variable IBDp Value
Yes
n (%)		No
n (%)
Living environment <0.001
Urban environment113 (67.7)59 (40.7)
Rural environment54 (32.3)86 (59.3)
Smoker <0.001
Yes36 (21.6)25 (17.2)
No82 (49.1)103 (71)
Former smoker49 (29.3)17 (11.8)
Number of cigarettes smoked daily 0.778
Less than 520 (23.5)8 (19)
Between 6 and 1541 (48.2)20 (47.6)
More than 1624 (28.3)14 (33.4)
Alcohol consumption 0.463
Yes22 (13.2)26 (17.9)
No140 (83.8)116 (80)
Former drinker5 (3)3 (2.1)
AUDIT score (mean ± SD)2.75 ± 3.413.55 ± 4.190.063
Risk of alcohol addiction 0.423
Low risk151 (90.4)127 (87.6)
Medium or high risk16 (9.6)18 (12.4)
WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire score (mean ± SD)85.64 ± 17.5290.84 ± 14.510.004
Use of antibiotics 0.072
Yes52 (31.1)32 (22.1)
No115 (68.9)113 (77.9)
Type of antibiotic 0.129
Penicillins13 (25)13 (40.6)
Cephalosporins0 (0)1 (3.1)
Macrolides0 (0)3 (9.4)
Quinolones4 (7.7)1 (3.1)
Sulfonamides1 (1.9)0 (0)
Glycopeptides0 (0)1 (3.1)
Rifamycins1 (1.9)1 (3.1)
Nitroimidazoles3 (5.8)1 (3.1)
Phosphomycins6 (11.5)3 (9.4)
Not specified24 (46.2)8 (25.1)
Use of NSAIDs 0.098
Yes54 (32.3)60 (41.4)
No113 (67.7)85 (58.6)
Type of NSAIDs 0.022
Enantyum5 (9.1)16 (27.1)
Ibuprofen17 (30.9)22 (37.3)
Diclofenac1 (1.8)0 (0)
Naproxen10 (18.2)7 (11.9)
COXIBs5 (9.1)0 (0)
Not specified17 (30.9)14 (23.7)
Goldberg anxiety subscale score (mean ± SD)4.8 ± 2.993.04 ± 2.76<0.001
Anxiety <0.001
Yes110 (65.9)58 (40)
No57 (34.1)87 (60)
Goldberg depression subscale score (mean ± SD)3.61 ± 2.842.16 ± 2.28<0.001
Depression 0.005
Yes110 (65.9)73 (50.3)
No57 (34.1)72 (49.7)
IBD—inflammatory bowel disease; AUDIT—Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test; SD—standard deviation; WHOQOL-BREF—World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version; NSAIDs—nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; COXIBs—cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors.
Table 3. Characteristics of the IBD patients according to IBD type.
Table 3. Characteristics of the IBD patients according to IBD type.
VariableType of IBDp Value
Crohn‘s Disease
n (%)		Ulcerative Colitis
n (%)
Age (mean years ± SD)43.98 ± 13.4746.51 ± 12.630.218
Sex 0.566
Man29 (30.5)25 (34.7)
Female66 (69.5)47 (65.3)
IBD medication 0.001
Yes77 (81.1)70 (97.2)
No18 (18.9)2 (2.8)
Type of IBD medication <0.001
Aminosalicylates5 (5.3)34 (47.2)
Immunosuppressants11 (11.6)7 (9.7)
Biological therapies61 (64.2)29 (40.3)
Without medication18 (18.9)2 (2.8)
Adherence to treatment 0.609
Yes63 (66.3)45 (62.5)
No32 (33.7)27 (37.5)
IBD—inflammatory bowel disease.
Table 4. Macronutrient consumption comparison according to the presence of IBDs.
Table 4. Macronutrient consumption comparison according to the presence of IBDs.
VariablePresence of IBDsp Value
Yes
m (±SD)		No
m (±SD)
Total calories912.75 (±420.06)770.51 (±348.33)<0.001
Total proteins30.28 (±13.39)26.04 (±12.87)0.005
Total lipids21.75 (±19.1)14.1 (±14.39)<0.001
Total carbohydrates158.16 (±67.94)142.26 (±62.66)0.033
Fibre16.6 (±11.95)19.05 (±11.54)0.068
IBD—inflammatory bowel disease.
Table 5. Bivariate correlations.
Table 5. Bivariate correlations.
Simple Correlation
AgeAUDIT ScoreGoldberg Anxiety ScoreGoldberg Depression ScoreWHOQOL-BREF Total Quality of Life ScoreDaily KcalDaily ProteinDaily FatsDaily
Carbohydrates		Daily Fibre
Age-−0.0870.0600.043−0.160 **0.1070.0060.0750.0960.011
AUDIT score -0.0930.0940.0510.0070.0890.154 **−0.036−0.096
Goldberg anxiety score -0.755 **−0.435 **−0.0170.0340.062−0.048−0.124 *
Goldberg depression score -−0.501 **−0.0180.0030.050−0.031−0.113 *
WHOQOL-BREF total quality of life score -−0.050−0.030−0.068−0.0360.062
Daily kcal -0.819 **0.582 **0.917 **0.445 **
Daily protein -0.608 **0.697 **0.312 **
Daily fats -0.292 **−0.196 **
Daily carbohydrates -0.679 **
Daily fibre -
Data are presented as Pearson’s correlation coefficients. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.001. AUDIT—Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test; WHOQOL-BREF—World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version.
Table 6. Logistic regression model for the associations between inflammatory bowel diseases and the sociodemographic and health characteristics of the Spanish sample.
Table 6. Logistic regression model for the associations between inflammatory bowel diseases and the sociodemographic and health characteristics of the Spanish sample.
VariableSimple Logistic RegressionMultiple Logistic Regression *
Crude OR (95% CI)p ValueAdjusted OR (95% CI)p Value
Age1.047 (1.029–1.066)<0.0011.048 (1.027–1.070)<0.001
Living environment
Urban environment3.050 (1.919–4.849)<0.0013.877 (2.223–6.732)<0.001
Rural environmentReference Reference
Anxiety
Yes2.895 (1.825–4.591)<0.0013.039 (1.772–5.211)<0.001
NoReference Reference
Total daily calories1.001 (1–1.002)0.0020.993 (0.985–1.001)0.085
Total daily protein1.027 (1.008–1.046)0.0061.048 (1.000–1.097)0.050
Total daily lipids1.034 (1.015–1.053)<0.0011.059 (0.998–1.123)0.057
Total daily carbohydrates1.004 (1–1.007)0.0351.039 (1.000–1.078)0.047
Total daily fibre0.982 (0.964–1.001)0.0690.922 (0.875–0.971)0.002
CI—confidence interval; OR—odds ratio; * R2 Nagelkerke value for multiple logistic regression = 0.361.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Serrano-Fernandez, V.; Laredo-Aguilera, J.A.; Navarrete-Tejero, C.; Molina-Gallego, B.; Lopez-Fernandez-Roldan, A.; Carmona-Torres, J.M. The Role of Environmental and Nutritional Factors in the Development of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Case–Control Study. Nutrients 2024, 16, 2463. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16152463

AMA Style

Serrano-Fernandez V, Laredo-Aguilera JA, Navarrete-Tejero C, Molina-Gallego B, Lopez-Fernandez-Roldan A, Carmona-Torres JM. The Role of Environmental and Nutritional Factors in the Development of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Case–Control Study. Nutrients. 2024; 16(15):2463. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16152463

Chicago/Turabian Style

Serrano-Fernandez, Victor, Jose Alberto Laredo-Aguilera, Carlos Navarrete-Tejero, Brigida Molina-Gallego, Angel Lopez-Fernandez-Roldan, and Juan Manuel Carmona-Torres. 2024. "The Role of Environmental and Nutritional Factors in the Development of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Case–Control Study" Nutrients 16, no. 15: 2463. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16152463

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop