Next Article in Journal
From Struggle to Strength: A Multicentric Study on How Public Policies for Celiac Disease Transform Lives
Previous Article in Journal
Nutritional Assessment in Outpatients with Heart Failure
Previous Article in Special Issue
Association of Eicosapentaenoic and Docosahexaenoic Acid Intake with Low Birth Weight in the Second Trimester: The Japan Pregnancy Eating and Activity Cohort Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 16
Issue 17
10.3390/nu16172854
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Maternal Breast Growth and Body Mass Index Are Associated with Low Milk Production in Women

by
Xuehua Jin
1,2,3,
Ching Tat Lai
1,2,3,
Sharon L. Perrella
1,2,3,
Jacki L. McEachran
1,2,3,
Zoya Gridneva
1,2,3,* and
Donna T. Geddes
1,2,3
1
School of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
2
UWA Centre for Human Lactation Research and Translation, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
3
ABREAST Network, Perth, WA 6000, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2024, 16(17), 2854; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16172854
Submission received: 6 August 2024 / Revised: 20 August 2024 / Accepted: 23 August 2024 / Published: 26 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Healthy Eating, Physical Activity and Weight Changes among Pregnant and Postpartum Women—Second Edition)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Maternal breast volume is determined by the quantity of glandular and adipose tissue, and it undergoes significant changes during pregnancy. These changes are intricately linked to the development of glandular tissue, which most likely reflects lactation capacity. Evidence indicates that women with overweight or obesity exhibit larger breast volume compared to those with a normal body mass index (BMI), emphasizing the close relationship between breast volume and maternal adiposity. Hence, we aim to investigate breast volume growth and maternal BMI as potential risk factors for low milk production. Methods: Lactating women (n = 609) from the Perth metropolitan area in Western Australia between 2011 and 2023 were included in the analysis. Twenty-four-hour milk production measurements were conducted using the test weighing method, and milk removal frequencies were recorded. Mothers completed questionnaires regarding demographic, obstetric and infant details. Linear and logistic regression models were used to determine maternal and infant factors associated with milk production. Results: Here we show that increasing maternal age and BMI are associated with low milk production. Moreover, larger pre-pregnancy breast volume and breast growth are associated with both higher BMI and milk production. Conclusions: Women who are older, have an obese BMI and who have minimal pre-pregnancy breast volume and breast growth should be provided with antenatal screening and breastfeeding support as they are more likely to experience low milk production.

1. Introduction

Low milk production (LMP) poses a significant barrier to exclusive and continued breastfeeding [1]. From anatomical and physiological perspectives, sufficient breast development constitutes a fundamental prerequisite for optimal milk production (MP) capacity, while adequate and frequent milk removal is critical to full MP postpartum [2,3]. Under the influence of hormones, the main changes occurring in the mammary gland are initiated at puberty, including the formation of terminal end buds, ductal elongation and side branching. During pregnancy, changes in the breast, marked by rapid expansion of the ductular–lobular–alveolar system, lead to an increase in breast volume (BV) [4]. However, women with breast hypoplasia may exhibit impairment or absence of this developmental progress, leading to inadequate glandular tissue and, therefore, MP to meet their infants’ nutritional requirements [5].
The BV changes during pregnancy are related to glandular tissue development [6], which is a major determinant of lactation capacity. Several studies have shown that minimal BV growth (ΔBV) during pregnancy was associated with insufficient milk supply and a shorter duration of both exclusive and any breastfeeding [7,8]. Conversely, results from another study indicated that ΔBV during pregnancy was not related to the probability of establishing successful lactation [9]. Additionally, a study examining BV throughout lactation and comparing it to pre-pregnancy levels found no associations between increased BV with MP at any stage of lactation [10]. Up to now, there is no consensus in this regard, and more research needs to be carried out.
Adipose tissue contributes to BV, comprising up to 56% [11]. BV is affected by maternal adiposity, with evidence that women with overweight and obesity have 2–3 times greater BV than women with a normal body mass index (BMI) [12]. Interestingly, women with obesity are more likely to report limited breast growth during pregnancy [7]. This suggests the possibility of limited breast development, with reduced ductal branching and impaired alveolar development evident in rodent models [13], which show reduced lactation capacity in obese dams [14]. In women, obesity itself is widely recognized as a risk factor for suboptimal breastfeeding outcomes. Compared to women with a normal BMI, women within an overweight or obese BMI range are less likely to initiate, exclusively breastfeed or continue breastfeeding [15,16]. Furthermore, emerging evidence suggests that greater volumes of mammary adipose tissue in women with obesity may produce or store higher levels of metabolically active endogenous steroid hormones and environmental lipophilic chemicals, exerting an adverse impact on MP [17].
Considered together, BV and maternal adiposity are closely linked traits, with their interaction potentially impacting MP. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationships between MP, ΔBV from pre-pregnancy to postpartum and maternal postpartum BMI, potentially providing antenatally identifiable risk factors for LMP.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

This is a retrospective cohort study involving lactating women whose 24 h MP and bra size data were collected between 2011 and 2023 in the Perth metropolitan area, Western Australia. Data were retrieved from studies that included women with no milk supply concerns as well as women with potential LMP. Exclusion criteria included preterm birth (birth gestation < 37 weeks), low infant birth weight (<2500 g), multiple births, smoking, history of nipple piercings and breast surgery. The final cohort included 609 participants. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee at The University of Western Australia (2019/RA/4/20/6134). Informed written consent was obtained from all participants.

2.2. Data Collection

Given the stability in daily infant intake of human milk between 1–6 months postpartum [18], 24 h MP measurements were conducted within this temporal range using the test weighing method [19]. Briefly, pre- and post-feed weights of infants were recorded using electronic scales (±2.0 g; Electronic Baby Weigh Scale, Medela Inc., McHenry, IL, USA) for all feeds in one 24 ± 4 h period. Additionally, weights of milk collection bottles before and after any manual or pump breast expressions were also included in the assessment of MP. All removed milk weights were recorded in grams and expressed in milliliters based on a milk density of 1.03 g/mL [20]. The 24 h MP was calculated with the formula below, where vi is the volume of each feed/expression, N is the total number of feeds and expressions and T is the elapsed time from the end of the first feed until the end of the last feed.
M P = ∑ i = 2 N v i 24 T
The cohort was classified into two groups: low milk production (LMP, <600 mL/24 h) and normal milk production (NMP, ≥600 mL/24 h). Milk removal frequency, including breastfeeding frequency and milk expression frequency, was recorded during the MP measurement process. Mothers completed questionnaires regarding demographic, obstetric and infant details, including maternal age, height, current weight, pre-pregnancy and postpartum bra size, parity, birth gestation, birth mode, infant birth weight and sex. Maternal BMI was calculated as kg/m2, and BV (cm3) of one breast was calculated based on both bra cup size and band size referring to the online chart (Table 1) [21]. ΔBV was calculated as postpartum BV minus pre-pregnancy BV.

2.3. Statistical Analyses

Descriptive statistics are presented as mean and standard deviation for continuous variables and frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. Correlation analysis was used to examine the interrelations among variables (Supplementary Material Figure S1). Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were used to assess the associations of maternal and infant characteristics with MP on both continuous (linear regression) and categorical (logistic regression) outcomes. All relevant covariates were initially included in the multivariable regression models. We used the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) as a tool for the final model selection, opting for the model with the lowest AIC score [22]. Since AIC is sensitive to sample variability, to increase reliability, we repeated the selection procedure across 500 bootstrap resampling technique [23]. To be included in the final models, a covariate had to be selected by more than 50% of the bootstrapped models. The covariates selected from the bootstrapped models were the same as those identified by the lowest AIC. The Mann–Whitney U-test and post-hoc Bonferroni test were applied to elucidate differences between maternal BV and BMI groups. The significance level was set at p < 0.05, and all analyses were carried out in R Statistical Software 4.2.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

3. Results

3.1. Descriptive Statistics

Characteristics of the mothers and infants are presented in Table 2 (n = 609). One hundred and seventy women (27.9%) were identified to have LMP and 439 women (72.1%) had NMP. Milk expression was recorded by 263 mothers (43.2%), including 24 (3.9%) who exclusively expressed. Of those with recorded BMI data, 205 women (42.1%) had a normal BMI (<25 kg/m2), while 282 (57.9%) were overweight or obese (≥25 kg/m2).

3.2. Maternal and Infant Factors Associated with Milk Production

Univariable linear regression analysis revealed significant negative associations of maternal age and BMI with MP (Table 3). Milk expression frequency was significantly positively associated with MP, with an average 5.5 mL/24 h produced with each additional expression frequency. Mothers of male infants had a significantly higher MP (50.5 mL/24 h on average) compared to mothers of female infants. After adjusting for potential confounders, the negative associations of maternal age and BMI with MP persisted. With every one-year increase in maternal age, there was an average 7.8 mL/24 h decrease in MP, while each one-unit increase in maternal BMI was associated with an 8.4 mL/24 h decrease in MP. Infant sex exhibited no significant association in the multivariable analysis. ΔBV showed small but significant positive associations with MP. Moreover, birth mode was significantly associated with MP, with MP after vaginal birth on average 45.1 mL/24 h lower than after C-section birth.

3.3. Maternal and Infant Factors Associated with the Likelihood of Low Milk Production

Table 4 presents the results of logistic regression analysis. In the univariable analysis, maternal age and BMI showed significant associations with LMP. Each one-year increase in age was associated with a 5.4% higher likelihood, and every 1 unit increase in BMI was associated with 7.3% higher likelihood of LMP. These associations remained significant after adjusting for potential confounders. However, breastfeeding frequency and parity, which exhibited significant associations with LMP in the univariable analysis, were not significant when other confounders were considered. Additionally, in the multivariable analysis, a 100 cm3 larger pre-pregnancy BV was associated with a 10% decrease in the odds of LMP, while a 100 cm3 larger ΔBV was associated with a 20% decrease in the likelihood of LMP.

3.4. Maternal Breast Volume Growth and Body Mass Index

Women with an overweight or obese BMI had significantly higher BV at both pre-pregnancy and postpartum (p < 0.001), as well as higher ΔBV (p = 0.028). Although maternal BV typically increased from pre-pregnancy to postpartum, a small proportion of women (n = 83, 13.6%) reported no noticeable breast growth, while 47 women (7.7%) had ΔBV > 400 cm3. Interestingly, women who did not observe any breast growth exhibited the highest percentage of LMP (39.8%), and those with ΔBV > 400 cm3 had the highest percentage of NMP (80.9%). For women with ΔBV > 200 cm3 (Figure 1A), those with normal BMI had significantly higher MP than women with overweight or obese BMI (mean difference: 93.8 mL/24 h, p = 0.042). Both normal BMI and ΔBV > 200 cm3 had significantly higher MP compared to women with overweight or obese BMI and ΔBV ≤ 200 cm3 (mean difference: 108.1 mL/24 h, p = 0.006). Moreover, when compared with the group of normal BMI and ΔBV > 200 cm3, overweight or obese BMI groups were more than twice as likely to have LMP, even with adequate breast growth from pre-pregnancy to postpartum (Figure 1B).

4. Discussion

The findings of this study suggest that increased maternal age and BMI are associated with LMP. Furthermore, larger maternal pre-pregnancy BV and breast growth are associated with both higher BMI and MP. Overall, the study contributes valuable insights into the intricate relationships between maternal characteristics, reproductive BV dynamics and MP outcomes.
In our cohort, each one-year increase in maternal age is associated with a 5.4% higher likelihood of LMP. This aligns with the decline in MP observed with age in dairy cows [24]. Studies in women also suggest that increasing maternal age poses a risk for non-exclusive breastfeeding and shorter breastfeeding duration [25,26,27]. However, two small-scale studies measuring 24 h MP in women found no significant age-related associations [28,29]. Aging is accompanied by changes in body composition and a decline in basal metabolic rate [30], which might affect the overall energy balance available for lactation. Additionally, aging is associated with decreases in both insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity [31]. Lower insulin sensitivity may be linked to impaired secretory differentiation, with subsequent delayed secretory activation and reduced MP [32]. Furthermore, increasing maternal age is associated with significantly elevated risks for metabolic disorders and pregnancy complications, such as chronic/gestational hypertension, diabetes and excessive labor bleeding [33], all of which have been linked to impaired lactation [34]. It is important to note that whilst the association between maternal age and MP was statistically significant, the decrease in MP with each additional year of maternal age was only 7.8 mL/24 h. This represents 1.3% of 600 mL, which is not a substantial amount to worry about for women with NMP.
Our analysis revealed an unexpected finding that vaginal birth was associated with lower MP. Notably, no associations were found between vaginal birth and the likelihood of LMP in the logistic regression model. This suggests that birth mode is not a significant risk factor for LMP. Previous research has highlighted C-section as a potential variable hindering the onset of lactation [35,36]. Moreover, recent studies show that C-section is associated with lower rates of exclusive and any breastfeeding, as well as earlier cessation [36,37]. Our observation may be influenced by the possibility that women participating in our study were committed to breastfeeding, as indicated by their longer intended breastfeeding duration, with 73.8% planning to breastfeed for more than 12 months [38]. Additionally, 50.4% of women in our cohort had obtained a diploma, bachelor’s degree or higher education, likely increasing their awareness of the importance of frequent milk removal in the immediate postpartum period [39]. This underscores the need to intensively study breastfeeding behaviors in the first 2 weeks postpartum, which is critical to not only the initiation of lactation but the level of MP attained [40].
In agreement with previous reports [29,41], high BMI is an important risk factor for LMP. Insights from animal models reveal that obesity-induced lactogenesis impairment may result from altered mammary gland structure, such as fewer and smaller alveoli, larger adipose deposits and reduced ductal branching frequency [13,42]. Obesity is associated with diverse endocrine dysregulations. Elevated BMI is a recognized precursor to metabolic disorders, including gestational diabetes mellitus, type 2 diabetes mellitus and polycystic ovary syndrome, potentially driven by insulin deficiency or resistance [43,44]. Insulin metabolism plays a pivotal role in milk secretion, regulating genes involved in mammary epithelial cell proliferation and stimulating milk protein and lipid biosynthesis [45,46,47]. Moreover, reduced prolactin activity has been observed in lactating obese rodents and in women with obesity, which may be responsible for reduced lactogenesis and synthesis of milk components, as well as increased lipogenesis and lipid stored in adipocytes [48,49]. Recent evidence indicates that mammary adipose tissue in women with obesity may produce or store higher levels of estrogens, progesterone and external lipophilic chemicals, exerting an adverse impact on MP [17]. Additionally, women with overweight or obese BMI more frequently report postpartum body confidence issues and body image concerns [50,51], which are associated with both intended and actual shorter breastfeeding duration [52]. As presented in our study, women with higher BMI generally have larger breasts, and may find it more difficult to position their infants for breastfeeding [53,54]. Health care providers have noted that women with both obesity and large breasts face greater challenges in initiating breastfeeding compared to their counterparts with either obesity or large breasts alone [55]. This can be attributed to the combined effects of disrupted endocrine regulation induced by obesity and the psychological and practical challenges influencing autocrine control of milk synthesis.
While the significant changes in mammary gland development and breast size are initiated at puberty, during pregnancy, the breast attains its maximum development in response to hormonal stimulation [56]. Placental-derived estrogens and progesterone play a crucial role in stimulating extensive ductal growth, branching and lobuloalveolar development [57,58,59,60]. Recent evidence suggests that the pathways leading to either LMP or NMP start as early as puberty. It was reported that later menarche correlated with the absence of breast growth during both puberty and pregnancy, which further correlated with lower numbers of ducts with smaller diameters and, consecutively, with lower MP [61]. This partly explains our finding that lower pre-pregnancy BV was associated with LMP. Associations between breast growth during pregnancy and breastfeeding outcomes remain under debate. Some studies suggest no association between breast growth during pregnancy and 24 h MP or the probability of establishing successful lactation [9,62], while others propose that women with higher ΔBV may have a higher likelihood of successfully initiating and sustaining breastfeeding [7,8]. So far, limited studies have explored postpartum BV changes or engorgement in relation to lactation outcomes, including secretory activation and breastfeeding frequency. In our study, lower pre-pregnancy BV and ΔBV emerged as risk factors for LMP, albeit less significantly than the impact of high BMI. Given the strong relationship between BV, ΔBV and maternal BMI, the potential positive influence of higher BV or ΔBV on MP may be offset by the substantial adverse effects of obesity. Nevertheless, confirming normal breast glandular development during pregnancy is essential, as reflected in a higher incidence of LMP among women with no ΔBV. Furthermore, since more than 60% of women lacking breast growth successfully achieved NMP, it’s important to note that the absence of ΔBV doesn’t necessarily indicate underdeveloped mammary glands. Some women with no ΔBV during pregnancy may still notice breast changes such as increased density and heaviness. These changes signify the development of glandular tissue and the potential for NMP. However, mammary hypoplasia, an uncommon condition with an uncertain etiology, can impede breast growth during pregnancy and result in insufficient glandular tissue for NMP [63,64]. Features of breast hypoplasia may include a wide intermammary space, breast asymmetry and a tubular shape of the breasts [5]. Clinically, the development of breast glandular tissue can be assessed through inspection, palpation and various imaging techniques [65,66]. Women who lack breast growth during pregnancy and suspect breast hypoplasia should seek evaluation of their glandular development and guidance from maternity care providers.
A notable strength of our study is the substantial sample size, which enhances the validity and precision of our study results, contributing to a more thorough understanding of the relationships between BV and MP. Another strength lies in our approach to measuring actual 24 h MP using a validated reference method [67]. Due to the practical difficulties of 24 h MP measurements, such as high cost and participant compliance, the reported outcomes of lactation-related studies are usually limited to durations of exclusive or any breastfeeding. To our knowledge, only one study prior to ours has measured 24 h MP during established lactation and explored its relationship with ΔBV during pregnancy [62]. However, this study was limited by a small sample size of only 8 participants, thereby constraining the statistical power of their findings.
We acknowledge a limitation in the reliance on self-reported bra size, height and weight, which may introduce potential biases [68]. Factors such as wearing the wrong-sized bra [69] or an old bra with a loose band could contribute to inaccuracies in the recorded data. Additionally, collecting pre-pregnancy bra size data postpartum may have led to recall bias. Moreover, BV was a crude calculation, and there are likely some design differences between bra manufacturers. However, we believe that this approach allows women to estimate BV without any technical assistance, and an accurate measurement of breast volume is difficult to achieve [10]. Future studies might consider implementing more standardized measurement procedures such as three-dimensional scanning or computerized measurement to mitigate this limitation. Furthermore, investigating changes in breast density and heaviness as well as BV could provide valuable insights that assist in distinguishing between cases of no actual breast growth but perceived glandular development and cases where neither growth nor development have occurred in pregnancy. Lastly, the 600 mL threshold used to define LMP and NMP might not capture all individual variations, as 600 mL may be insufficient for optimal growth in some infants. Including infant growth data in future research could further refine the differentiation between LMP and NMP.

5. Conclusions

Women who are older, have an obese BMI and who have minimal pre-pregnancy BV and breast growth have a higher risk of LMP, and so antenatal screening may assist in timely detection and interventions to ensure the mutual health benefits of mothers and infants.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu16172854/s1, Figure S1: Correlation analysis of milk production and maternal and infant characteristics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.J., Z.G. and D.T.G.; methodology, C.T.L. and Z.G.; software, C.T.L.; validation, Z.G.; formal analysis, X.J.; investigation, X.J.; resources, J.L.M. and S.L.P.; data curation, J.L.M. and Z.G.; writing—original draft preparation, X.J.; writing—review and editing, C.T.L., S.L.P., Z.G. and D.T.G.; visualization, X.J.; supervision, C.T.L., S.L.P. and D.T.G.; project administration, J.L.M.; funding acquisition, D.T.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

C.T.L., S.L.P., J.L.M., Z.G. and D.T.G. receive salaries from an unrestricted research grant paid by Medela AG (Switzerland) and administered by the University of Western Australia (UWA). XJ is supported by UWA–China Scholarship Council (CSC) Joint PhD Scholarship and UWA–CSC Higher Degree by Research Top-Up Scholarship.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the UWA Human Research Ethics Committee (2019/RA/4/20/6134, date 21 May 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all participants involved in this study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the families who participated in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

D.T.G. declares past participation in the Scientific Advisory Board of Medela AG. C.T.L., S.L.P., J.L.M., Z.G. and D.T.G. are/were supported by an unrestricted research grant from Medela AG, administered by UWA. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Breastfeeding Recommendations. Available online: https://www.who.int/health-topics/breastfeeding#tab=tab_2 (accessed on 2 March 2023).
  2. Weaver, S.R.; Hernandez, L.L. Autocrine-paracrine regulation of the mammary gland. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 842–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kent, J.C.; Prime, D.K.; Garbin, C.P. Principles for maintaining or increasing breast milk production. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal. Nurs. 2012, 41, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Sriraman, N.K. The Nuts and Bolts of Breastfeeding: Anatomy and Physiology of Lactation. Curr. Probl. Pediatr. Adolesc. Health Care 2017, 47, 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kam, R.L.; Amir, L.H.; Cullinane, M. Is there an association between breast hypoplasia and breastfeeding outcomes? A systematic review. Breastfeed. Med. 2021, 16, 594–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pawłowski, B.; Żelaźniewicz, A. The evolution of perennially enlarged breasts in women: A critical review and a novel hypothesis. Biol. Rev. 2021, 96, 2794–2809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vanky, E.; Nordskar, J.; Leithe, H.; Hjorth-Hansen, A.; Martinussen, M.; Carlsen, S. Breast size increment during pregnancy and breastfeeding in mothers with polycystic ovary syndrome: A follow-up study of a randomised controlled trial on metformin versus placebo. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2012, 119, 1403–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Neifert, M.; DeMarzo, S.; Seacat, J.; Young, D.; Leff, M.; Orleans, M. The influence of breast surgery, breast appearance, and pregnancy-induced breast changes on lactation sufficiency as measured by infant weight gain. Birth 1990, 17, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Żelaźniewicz, A.; Pawłowski, B. Maternal breast volume in pregnancy and lactation capacity. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2019, 168, 180–189. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kent, J.C.; Mitoulas, L.; Cox, D.B.; Owens, R.A.; Hartmann, P.E. Breast volume and milk production during extended lactation in women. Exp. Physiol. 1999, 84, 435–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Vandeweyer, E.; Hertens, D. Quantification of glands and fat in breast tissue: An experimental determination. Ann. Anat.-Anat. Anz. 2002, 184, 181–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Coltman, C.E.; Steele, J.R.; McGhee, D.E. Breast volume is affected by body mass index but not age. Ergonomics 2017, 60, 1576–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Flint, D.J.; Travers, M.T.; Barber, M.C.; Binart, N.; Kelly, P.A. Diet-induced obesity impairs mammary development and lactogenesis in murine mammary gland. Am. J. Physiol.-Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 288, E1179–E1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hernandez, L.L.; Grayson, B.E.; Yadav, E.; Seeley, R.J.; Horseman, N.D. High fat diet alters lactation outcomes: Possible involvement of inflammatory and serotonergic pathways. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e32598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chang, Y.S.; Glaria, A.A.; Davie, P.; Beake, S.; Bick, D. Breastfeeding experiences and support for women who are overweight or obese: A mixed-methods systematic review. Matern. Child Nutr. 2020, 16, e12865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Turcksin, R.; Bel, S.; Galjaard, S.; Devlieger, R. Maternal obesity and breastfeeding intention, initiation, intensity and duration: A systematic review. Matern. Child Nutr. 2014, 10, 166–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jin, X.; Perrella, S.L.; Lai, C.T.; Taylor, N.L.; Geddes, D.T. Causes of Low Milk Supply: The Roles of Estrogens, Progesterone, and Related External Factors. Adv. Nutr. 2023, 15, 100129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kent, J.C.; Hepworth, A.R.; Sherriff, J.L.; Cox, D.B.; Mitoulas, L.R.; Hartmann, P.E. Longitudinal Changes in Breastfeeding Patterns from 1 to 6 Months of Lactation. Breastfeed. Med. 2013, 8, 401–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kent, J.C.; Hepworth, A.R.; Langton, D.B.; Hartmann, P.E. Impact of measuring milk production by test weighing on breastfeeding confidence in mothers of term infants. Breastfeed. Med. 2015, 10, 318–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Neville, M.C.; Keller, R.; Seacat, J.; Lutes, V.; Neifert, M.; Casey, C.; Allen, J.; Archer, P. Studies in human lactation: Milk volumes in lactating women during the onset of lactation and full lactation. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1988, 48, 1375–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Calculating Cup Volume and Breast Weight. Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bra_size#cite_note-Plussize_Chart-103 (accessed on 30 November 2023).
  22. Akaike, H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1974, 19, 716–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lubke, G.H.; Campbell, I.; McArtor, D.; Miller, P.; Luningham, J.; van den Berg, S.M. Assessing Model Selection Uncertainty Using a Bootstrap Approach: An update. Struct. Equ. Model. A Multidiscip. J. 2017, 24, 230–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lush, J.L.; Shrode, R.R. Changes in Milk Production with Age and Milking Frequency. J. Dairy Sci. 1950, 33, 338–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kitano, N.; Nomura, K.; Kido, M.; Murakami, K.; Ohkubo, T.; Ueno, M.; Sugimoto, M. Combined effects of maternal age and parity on successful initiation of exclusive breastfeeding. Prev. Med. Rep. 2016, 3, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Colombo, L.; Crippa, B.L.; Consonni, D.; Bettinelli, M.E.; Agosti, V.; Mangino, G.; Bezze, E.N.; Mauri, P.A.; Zanotta, L.; Roggero, P.; et al. Breastfeeding Determinants in Healthy Term Newborns. Nutrients 2018, 10, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, W.; Wang, F.; Jiang, H.; Wang, L. Factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding during postpartum in Lanzhou city, China: A cross-sectional study. Front. Public Health 2023, 11, 1089764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kent, J.C.; Mitoulas, L.R.; Cregan, M.D.; Ramsay, D.T.; Doherty, D.A.; Hartmann, P.E. Volume and frequency of breastfeedings and fat content of breast milk throughout the day. Pediatrics 2006, 117, e387–e395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nommsen-Rivers, L.A.; Wagner, E.A.; Roznowski, D.M.; Riddle, S.W.; Ward, L.P.; Thompson, A. Measures of maternal metabolic health as predictors of severely low milk production. Breastfeed. Med. 2022, 17, 566–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. St-Onge, M.-P.; Gallagher, D. Body composition changes with aging: The cause or the result of alterations in metabolic rate and macronutrient oxidation? Nutrition 2010, 26, 152–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Basu, R.; Breda, E.; Oberg, A.L.; Powell, C.C.; Dalla Man, C.; Basu, A.; Vittone, J.L.; Klee, G.G.; Arora, P.; Jensen, M.D. Mechanisms of the age-associated deterioration in glucose tolerance: Contribution of alterations in insulin secretion, action, and clearance. Diabetes 2003, 52, 1738–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nommsen-Rivers, L.A. Does insulin explain the relation between maternal obesity and poor lactation outcomes? An overview of the literature. Adv. Nutr. 2016, 7, 407–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Luke, B.; Brown, M.B. Elevated risks of pregnancy complications and adverse outcomes with increasing maternal age. Hum. Reprod. 2007, 22, 1264–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Farah, E.; Barger, M.K.; Klima, C.; Rossman, B.; Hershberger, P. Impaired lactation: Review of delayed lactogenesis and insufficient lactation. J. Midwifery Women’s Health 2021, 66, 631–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Perrella, S.L.; Abelha, S.G.; Vlaskovsky, P.; McEachran, J.L.; Prosser, S.A.; Geddes, D.T. Australian Women’s Experiences of Establishing Breastfeeding after Caesarean Birth. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, L.; Wan, W.; Zhu, C. Breastfeeding after a cesarean section: A literature review. Midwifery 2021, 103, 103117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mallick, L.M.; Shenassa, E.D. Variation in Breastfeeding Initiation and Duration by Mode of Childbirth: A Prospective, Population-Based Study. Breastfeed. Med. 2024, 19, 262–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wen, J.; Yu, G.; Kong, Y.; Wei, H.; Zhao, S.; Liu, F. Effects of a theory of planned behavior-based intervention on breastfeeding behaviors after cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Nurs. Sci. 2021, 8, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sarki, M.; Parlesak, A.; Robertson, A. Comparison of national cross-sectional breast-feeding surveys by maternal education in Europe (2006–2016). Public Health Nutr. 2019, 22, 848–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Medina-Poeliniz, C.; Hoban, R.; Signorile, M.; Janes, J.; Fan, S.; Meier, P.P. Early Pumping Behaviors Predict Pumped Milk Volume, Achievement of Secretory Activation and Coming to Volume in Breast Pump-Dependent Mothers of Preterm Infants. Preprint 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Walker, R.E.; Harvatine, K.J.; Ross, A.C.; Wagner, E.A.; Riddle, S.W.; Gernand, A.D.; Nommsen-Rivers, L.A. Fatty Acid Transfer from Blood to Milk Is Disrupted in Mothers with Low Milk Production, Obesity, and Inflammation. J. Nutr. 2022, 152, 2716–2726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kamikawa, A.; Ichii, O.; Yamaji, D.; Imao, T.; Suzuki, C.; Okamatsu-Ogura, Y.; Terao, A.; Kon, Y.; Kimura, K. Diet-induced obesity disrupts ductal development in the mammary glands of nonpregnant mice. Dev. Dyn. 2009, 238, 1092–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rassie, K.; Mousa, A.; Joham, A.; Teede, H.J. Metabolic conditions including obesity, diabetes, and polycystic ovary syndrome: Implications for breastfeeding and breastmilk composition. In Seminars in Reproductive Medicine; Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  44. Suwaydi, M.A.; Wlodek, M.E.; Lai, C.T.; Prosser, S.A.; Geddes, D.T.; Perrella, S.L. Delayed secretory activation and low milk production in women with gestational diabetes: A case series. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022, 22, 350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lemay, D.G.; Ballard, O.A.; Hughes, M.A.; Morrow, A.L.; Horseman, N.D.; Nommsen-Rivers, L.A. RNA sequencing of the human milk fat layer transcriptome reveals distinct gene expression profiles at three stages of lactation. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e67531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Watt, A.P.; Lefevre, C.; Wong, C.S.; Nicholas, K.R.; Sharp, J.A. Insulin regulates human mammosphere development and function. Cell Tissue Res. 2021, 384, 333–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Neville, M.C.; Webb, P.; Ramanathan, P.; Mannino, M.P.; Pecorini, C.; Monks, J.; Anderson, S.M.; MacLean, P. The insulin receptor plays an important role in secretory differentiation in the mammary gland. Am. J. Physiol.-Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 305, E1103–E1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Luzardo-Ocampo, I.; Dena-Beltrán, J.L.; Ruiz-Herrera, X.; Ocampo-Ruiz, A.L.; Martínez de la Escalera, G.; Clapp, C.; Macotela, Y. Obesity-derived alterations in the lactating mammary gland: Focus on prolactin. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2023, 559, 111810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rasmussen, K.M.; Kjolhede, C.L. Prepregnant overweight and obesity diminish the prolactin response to suckling in the first week postpartum. Pediatrics 2004, 113, e465–e471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hauff, L.E.; Demerath, E.W. Body image concerns and reduced breastfeeding duration in primiparous overweight and obese women. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 2012, 24, 339–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Swanson, V.; Keely, A.; Denison, F.C. Does body image influence the relationship between body weight and breastfeeding maintenance in new mothers? Br. J. Health Psychol. 2017, 22, 557–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Brown, A.; Rance, J.; Warren, L. Body image concerns during pregnancy are associated with a shorter breast feeding duration. Midwifery 2015, 31, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Jarlenski, M.; McManus, J.; Diener-West, M.; Schwarz, E.B.; Yeung, E.; Bennett, W.L. Association between support from a health professional and breastfeeding knowledge and practices among obese women: Evidence from the Infant Practices Study II. Women’s Health Issues 2014, 24, 641–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Massov, L. Clinically overweight and obese mothers and low rates of breastfeeding: Exploring women’s perspectives. New Zealand Coll. Midwives J. 2015, 51, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Katz, K.A.; Nilsson, I.; Rasmussen, K.M. Danish health care providers’ perception of breastfeeding difficulty experienced by women who are obese, have large breasts, or both. J. Hum. Lact. 2010, 26, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Russo, J.; Russo, I.H. Development of the human breast. Maturitas 2004, 49, 2–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Feng, Y.; Manka, D.; Wagner, K.-U.; Khan, S.A. Estrogen receptor-α expression in the mammary epithelium is required for ductal and alveolar morphogenesis in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 14718–14723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Beleut, M.; Rajaram, R.D.; Caikovski, M.; Ayyanan, A.; Germano, D.; Choi, Y.; Schneider, P.; Brisken, C. Two distinct mechanisms underlie progesterone-induced proliferation in the mammary gland. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 2989–2994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lain, A.R.; Creighton, C.J.; Conneely, O.M. Research resource: Progesterone receptor targetome underlying mammary gland branching morphogenesis. Mol. Endocrinol. 2013, 27, 1743–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tong, J.; Zhang, H.; Wu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, Q.; Liu, Y. Oestrogens and prolactin regulate mammary gland epithelial cell growth by modulation of the Wnt signal pathway. Slov. Vet. Res. 2016, 53, 141. [Google Scholar]
  61. Gridneva, Z.; Rea, A.; Weight, D.; McEachran, J.L.; Lai, C.T.; Perrella, S.L.; Geddes, D.T. Maternal Factors and Breast Anatomy and Milk Production during Established Lactation. Proceedings 2023, 93, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Cox, D.B.; Kent, J.C.; Casey, T.M.; Owens, R.A.; Hartmann, P.E. Breast growth and the urinary excretion of lactose during human pregnancy and early lactation: Endocrine relationships. Exp. Physiol. 1999, 84, 421–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Thorley, V. Breast hypoplasia and breastfeeding: A case history. Breastfeed. Rev. 2005, 13, 13–16. [Google Scholar]
  64. Arbour, M.W.; Kessler, J.L. Mammary hypoplasia: Not every breast can produce sufficient milk. J. Midwifery Women’s Health 2013, 58, 457–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Alipour, S. Physical Breast Examination in Pregnancy and Lactation. In Diseases of the Breast during Pregnancy and Lactation; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 9–16. [Google Scholar]
  66. Abramson, L.; Massaro, L.; Alberty-Oller, J.J.; Melsaether, A. Breast Imaging During Pregnancy and Lactation. J. Breast Imaging 2019, 1, 342–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Scanlon, K.S.; Alexander, M.P.; Serdula, M.K.; Davis, M.K.; Bowman, B.A. Assessment of infant feeding: The validity of measuring milk intake. Nutr. Rev. 2002, 60, 235–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ng, C.D. Biases in self-reported height and weight measurements and their effects on modeling health outcomes. SSM Popul. Health 2019, 7, 100405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Greenbaum, A.R.; Heslop, T.; Morris, J.; Dunn, K.W. An investigation of the suitability of bra fit in women referred for reduction mammaplasty. Br. J. Plast. Surg. 2003, 56, 230–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nutrients 16 02854 g001
Figure 1. Maternal BMI and ΔBV in relation to milk production. (A) Interactive association of maternal BMI and ΔBV with MP. The box represents the interquartile range (IQR), with the line inside the box indicating the median. The whiskers extend to the lowest and highest data points within 1.5 times the IQR from the lower and upper quartiles, respectively. Data points beyond the whiskers are considered outliers. The red dashed line indicates 600 mL/24 h, which is the dividing line between low milk production and normal milk production. (B) Odds ratio of low milk production in different maternal BMI and ΔBV groups. BMI: body mass index; OR: odds ratio; ΔBV: breast volume growth; *: p < 0.05; **: p <0.01.
Figure 1. Maternal BMI and ΔBV in relation to milk production. (A) Interactive association of maternal BMI and ΔBV with MP. The box represents the interquartile range (IQR), with the line inside the box indicating the median. The whiskers extend to the lowest and highest data points within 1.5 times the IQR from the lower and upper quartiles, respectively. Data points beyond the whiskers are considered outliers. The red dashed line indicates 600 mL/24 h, which is the dividing line between low milk production and normal milk production. (B) Odds ratio of low milk production in different maternal BMI and ΔBV groups. BMI: body mass index; OR: odds ratio; ΔBV: breast volume growth; *: p < 0.05; **: p <0.01.
Nutrients 16 02854 g001
Table 1. Breast volume corresponding to bra size.
Table 1. Breast volume corresponding to bra size.
Breast Volume of One Breast (cm3)Australian Bra SizeUS Bra Size
1808A, 10AA30A, 32AA
2408B, 10A, 12AA30B, 32A, 34AA
3108C, 10B, 12A30C, 32B, 34A
3908D, 10C, 12B, 14A30D, 32C, 34B, 36A
4808DD/E, 10D, 12C, 14B, 16A30E, 32D, 34C, 36B, 38A
5908F, 10DD/E, 12D, 14C, 16B, 18A30F, 32E, 34D, 36C, 38B, 40A
71010F, 12DD/E, 14D, 16C, 18B32F, 34E, 36D, 38C, 40B
85010G, 12F, 14DD/E, 16D, 18C, 20B32G, 34F, 36E, 38D, 40C, 42B
100010H, 12G, 14F, 16DD/E, 18D, 20C32H, 34G, 36F, 38E, 40D, 42C
118012H, 14G, 16F, 18DD/E, 20D34H, 36G, 38F, 40E, 42D
137012I, 14H, 16G, 18F, 20DD/E34I, 36H, 38G, 40F, 42E
158014I, 16H, 18G, 20F, 22DD/E36I, 38H, 40G, 42F, 44E
181014J, 16I, 18H, 20G, 22F36J, 38I, 40H, 42G, 44F
206016J, 18I, 20H, 22G38J, 40I, 42H, 44G
Table 2. Maternal and infant characteristics.
Table 2. Maternal and infant characteristics.
CharacteristicsMean ± SD (Range, n) or Number (%)
Birth gestation (weeks)39.0 ± 1.1 (37–43, 609)
Infant age at MP measurement (months)2.9 ± 1.2 (1–6, 609)
MP (mL/24 h)718 ± 237 (48–1682, 609)
Milk removal frequency (times/24 h)13.4 ± 4.9 (2–40, 609)
Breastfeeding frequency (times/24 h)11.1 ± 4.6 (0–32, 609)
Milk expression frequency (times/24 h)2.3 ± 3.8 (0–20, 609)
Maternal age (years)33.3 ± 4.4 (20.6–48.2, 605)
Maternal BMI (kg/m2)27.1 ± 5.6 (16.9–64.5, 487)
Pre-pregnancy BV (cm3)554 ± 244 (180–2060, 609)
Postpartum BV (cm3)745 ± 274 (240–2060, 609)
ΔBV (cm3)192 ± 136 (−230–730, 609)
Parity: primiparous373 (61.3%)
Birth mode: vaginal380 (63.8%)
Infant sex: male312 (51.4%)
Infant birth weight (g)3443 ± 449 (2510–5045, 598)
BMI: body mass index; BV: breast volume; MP: milk production.
Table 3. Associations between maternal and infant characteristics and milk production.
Table 3. Associations between maternal and infant characteristics and milk production.
CharacteristicsUnivariable AnalysisMultivariable Analysis
Coefficient95% CIp-Value †Coefficient95% CIp-Value †
Maternal age (years)−6.977−11.221, −2.7340.001−7.770−12.519, −3.0200.001
Maternal BMI (kg/m2)−5.321−9.042, −1.6010.005−8.416−13.613, −3.2180.002
Pre-pregnancy BV (cm3)−0.064−0.141, 0.0140.1070.100−0.015, 0.2160.088
Postpartum BV (cm3)−0.022−0.091, 0.0470.531---
ΔBV (cm3)0.115−0.023, 0.2530.104 0.1680.019, 0.3160.027
Breastfeeding frequency (times/24 h)−1.702−5.827, 2.4230.418---
Milk expression frequency (times/24 h)5.5080.525, 10.4900.030---
Milk removal frequency (times/24 h)1.803−2.067, 5.6730.361---
Infant birth weight (g)0.014−0.027, 0.0560.497---
Infant sex (Female vs. Male)−50.490−88.066, −12.9180.009−35.067−76.048, 5.9140.093
Birth mode (Vaginal vs. C-section)−22.420−61.645, 16.8010.262−45.108−88.499, −1.7170.042
Parity (Primiparous vs. Multiparous)19.960−18.788, 58.7030.312---
-: not included in the multivariable model; †: bold font indicates statistically significant difference; BMI: body mass index; BV: breast volume; CI: confidence interval.
Table 4. Association between maternal and infant characteristics and the likelihood of low milk production.
Table 4. Association between maternal and infant characteristics and the likelihood of low milk production.
CharacteristicsUnivariable AnalysisMultivariable Analysis
OR95% CIp-Value †OR95% CIp-Value †
Maternal age (years)1.0541.013, 1.0970.0101.0561.007, 1.1070.024
Maternal BMI (kg/m2)1.0731.035, 1.111<0.0011.1171.060, 1.177<0.001
Pre-pregnancy BV (cm3)1.0011.000, 1.0010.1450.9990.997, 1.0000.014
Postpartum BV (cm3)1.0001.000, 1.0010.733---
ΔBV (cm3)0.9990.997, 1.0000.0540.9980.997, 1.0000.036
Breastfeeding frequency (times/24 h)0.9550.918, 0.9940.0230.9580.917, 1.0010.058
Milk expression frequency (times/24 h)1.0420.995, 1.0880.081---
Milk removal frequency (times/24 h)0.9850.949, 1.0230.435---
Infant birth weight (g)1.0001.000, 1.0000.975---
Infant sex (Female vs. male)1.0630.745, 1.5160.735---
Birth mode (Vaginal vs. C-section)0.8950.619, 1.2940.555---
Parity (Primiparous vs. Multiparous)0.6820.476, 0.9760.0370.7310.479, 1.1170.147
-: not included in the multivariable model; †: bold font indicates statistically significant difference; BMI: body mass index; BV: breast volume; CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jin, X.; Lai, C.T.; Perrella, S.L.; McEachran, J.L.; Gridneva, Z.; Geddes, D.T. Maternal Breast Growth and Body Mass Index Are Associated with Low Milk Production in Women. Nutrients 2024, 16, 2854. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16172854

AMA Style

Jin X, Lai CT, Perrella SL, McEachran JL, Gridneva Z, Geddes DT. Maternal Breast Growth and Body Mass Index Are Associated with Low Milk Production in Women. Nutrients. 2024; 16(17):2854. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16172854

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jin, Xuehua, Ching Tat Lai, Sharon L. Perrella, Jacki L. McEachran, Zoya Gridneva, and Donna T. Geddes. 2024. "Maternal Breast Growth and Body Mass Index Are Associated with Low Milk Production in Women" Nutrients 16, no. 17: 2854. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16172854

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop