Next Article in Journal
Comparing the Effectiveness of Different Dietary Educational Approaches for Carbohydrate Counting on Glycemic Control in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: Findings from the DIET-CARB Study, a Randomized Controlled Trial
Previous Article in Journal
No Effects of Omega-3 Supplementation on Kynurenine Pathway, Inflammation, Depressive Symptoms, and Stress Response in Males: A Placebo-Controlled Trial
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Parental Feeding Practices, Weight Perception, and Children’s Appetitive Traits Are Associated with Weight Trajectories in Preschoolers: A Longitudinal Study in China

1
School of Nursing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200025, China
2
Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King’s College London, London SE1 8WA, UK
3
Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, 70182 Örebro, Sweden
4
Department of Children’s Disease Prevention, Jinyang Community Health Service Center, Shanghai 200136, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Nutrients 2024, 16(21), 3746; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16213746
Submission received: 29 September 2024 / Revised: 21 October 2024 / Accepted: 30 October 2024 / Published: 31 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Nutrition)

Abstract

:
Objective: This study aimed to examine the trajectories of body mass index-for-age z-score (BAZ) in preschoolers and its association with parental feeding practices, weight perception, and children’s appetitive traits. Methods: A total of 433 preschoolers and their parents from eight public kindergartens in Shanghai were assessed annually over two years. A group-based trajectory model was employed to identify distinct BAZ patterns. Logistic regression was utilized to investigate the baseline factors associated with the BAZ trajectories. Results: Three distinct BAZ trajectories were identified among the preschoolers: “low-stable group” (n = 154, 37.3%), “moderate-stable group” (n = 214, 47.3%), and “progressive overweight and obesity group” (n = 65, 15.4%). The children perceived as overweight and obese by parents (OR = 10.57, 95% CI: 4.89–22.86), and those with lower satiety responsiveness at baseline (OR = 0.86, 95%CI: 0.76–0.97) were more likely to fall into the progressive overweight and obesity group as opposed to the moderate-stable group. Conversely, the children perceived as underweight by parents (OR = 457, 95%CI: 2.71–7.70) had a higher likelihood of being in the low-stable group rather than the moderate-stable group. Conclusions: This study unveiled three unique body weight trajectories among preschool children. Parental perception of children’s weight and lower satiety responsiveness were associated with preschoolers’ subsequent weight change, while parental feeding practices were not associated.

1. Introduction

Early childhood overweight and obesity (OWOB) has been a growing public health concern in many countries. According to WHO (2023) [1], the global prevalence of childhood obesity has significantly increased and become an epidemic since 2000, with an estimated 5.6% (about 37 million) of children under 5 years old being overweight or obese. Nearly half of these children reside in Asia. In China, the prevalence of OWOB among children under the age of 6 reached 10.4% in 2019 [2]. Children with OWOB are at higher risk of metabolic disorders, cardiovascular abnormalities, and other psychological problems compared to children with a healthy weight [3,4,5]. Therefore, it is critical to identify the risk factors to prevent OWOB among preschool children.
It is widely recognized that children’s body weight is affected by both genetic and environmental factors. As an essential part of the family’s dietary environment, parental feeding practices have been proven to be closely related to children’s weight [6,7,8,9,10]. Parental feeding practices are defined as intentional strategies employed by parents to directly shape their children’s eating behaviors, such as restrictive feeding, pressure to eat, and monitoring [11,12]. A systematic review of 31 studies [8] showed that parental restrictive feeding and pressure to eat were associated with children’s unhealthy weight, and this association was mostly examined in cross-sectional studies (n = 23). However, cross-sectional studies cannot provide causal inferences between variables. Longitudinal studies on parental feeding practices and child weight were limited and reported mixed findings. Two longitudinal studies conducted in Spain and Taiwan [7,9] indicated that mothers who monitored their children’s diet reduced the risk of subsequent overweight in school-age children. On the contrary, other studies [13,14] reported no association between parental feeding practices and child weight. These inconsistent results across studies might be due to the difference in the factors included in the model and the heterogeneity of the study sample [11,14].
According to the behavioral susceptibility theory [15,16] and Russell’s biopsychosocial model of the development of eating behavior and weight in childhood [17], we hypothesized that appetitive traits could mediate the pathways between genetics, environment, and weight gain. Food responsiveness (FR, the primary driver of eating onset) and satiety responsiveness (SR, the primary driver of eating offset) are the behavioral manifestations of children’s appetitive traits [18]. Several cross-sectional and longitudinal studies have indicated a positive correlation between FR and children’s weight and a negative correlation between SR and children’s weight [10,18,19]. As a result, it is important to consider children’s appetitive traits when investigating the association between parental feeding practices and OWOB.
The existing studies on parental feeding practices, children’s appetitive traits, and children’s weight were almost always conducted in Western countries [6,20], though parenting beliefs and feeding styles are embedded in and influenced by cultural norms. Caregivers’ feeding practices may differ across different countries and cultural contexts. In China, parents often neglect childhood OWOB [21,22], probably due to the traditional notion that increased food intake fosters greater growth. This attitude can result in feeding practices such as overfeeding that might interfere with children’s innate responses to hunger and fullness and affect their weight and overall health.
Consequently, it is necessary to examine how parental feeding behaviors and children’s appetite characteristics influence weight fluctuations in children in the Chinese cultural context.
Our previous cross-sectional study on preschoolers’ mothers [23] indicated that the maternal perception of children’s weight influenced maternal feeding practices. That is, mothers who perceived their children as overweight or obese tended to restrict their children’s diets and were less inclined to pressure them to eat. The current study was built on our previous work to investigate the role of the parental perception of children’s weight on weight changes in a cohort of preschoolers.
Considering the heterogeneity of body weight change across individuals, this study used group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) to analyze the distinct trajectories of preschoolers. GBTM differs from the traditional variable-centered analysis, focusing on individual weight changes over the entire period.
Overall, this study aimed to identify the weight trajectory of preschool children and analyze its correlates, particularly the role of parental feeding practices, the parental perception of children’s weight, and the children’s appetitive traits on childhood weight changes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Participants

This longitudinal study tracked weight changes among Chinese preschool children utilizing a convenience sample from eight public kindergartens in Pudong District, Shanghai. All the children from the junior class and their parents were invited to take part at baseline in October 2020 with annual follow-up until kindergarten graduation (junior class T0, middle class T1, and senior class T2). The sample size was determined by the G*Power software version 3.1. setting an α (two-tail) at 0.05 and a power at 0.95. Consequently, the necessary minimum sample size was 224 based on a similar study [24] of school-aged children which examined the association between the maternal perception of children’s weight and children’s weight change, identifying an effect size of 1.76 (95% confidence interval (CI):0.72,1.19).
A total of 644 preschool children and their caregivers were initially recruited. In this study, the parent–child relationship specifically referred to parents living with their children for a long time, and parents are the main ones responsible for the children’s diet. The exclusion criteria were as follows: parents who were not the primary caregivers, children with nutrition-related diseases (e.g., fever and diarrhea), and unqualified questionnaires. Overall, 433 (70.64%) preschool children completed the collection of objective data for height and weight at three time points. There were 180 children lost to follow-up (29.36%) due to the following reasons: absence, changing schools, and declining to participate in the follow-up investigation (Figure 1). Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (registration number: SJUPN-201908).

2.2. Procedures

The investigation team consisted of researchers, community pediatricians, nurses, and kindergarten teachers. The height and weight of the children were measured by trained community pediatricians visiting the kindergartens. All the paper questionnaires were distributed and collected in class by trained kindergarten teachers. All the parents provided written informed consent at each assessment point.

2.3. Measurements

2.3.1. Children’s Actual Weight

The children’s weight (in kilograms) and height (in centimeters) were measured and collected by trained doctors and nurses in the child health unit of the community hospital. According to the WHO guidelines [25], the children’s BAZ was calculated using the software WHO Anthro (for 2- to 5-year-old children) and Young Growth Curve (for 5- to 6-year-old children). BAZ was categorized into three groups: underweight (z-score < –2), normal weight (–2 ≤ z-score ≤ 1), and overweight or obese (z-score > 1). The BAZ trajectory reflects the potential dynamic changes in weight during children’s growth and development.

2.3.2. Parental Perception of Children’s Weight Status

Parental weight perception was assessed with the question, “How would you describe your child’s weight?” [26]. The parents responded on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (very underweight) to 5 (very overweight). The score was re-categorized into the following groups: underweight (≤2), normal weight (=3), and overweight or obese (≥4).

2.3.3. Parental Feeding Practices

Parental feeding practices over the past month were assessed using the Chinese Preschooler’s Caregivers’ Feeding Behavior Scale (CPCFBS) [27] and the Chinese version of the Child Feeding Questionnaire (C-CFQ) [28]. These two scales were used to assess six types of feeding practices: four items of content-restricted feeding (strict limitations on the children’s access to foods or opportunities to consume unhealthy foods), six items of encouraging healthy eating (the extent to create various ways for children to try fresh or healthy foods from meal preparation to the dining process), seven items of behavior-restricted feeding (the impact of parents’ demonstrations on children’s eating content, attitudes, and behaviors), two items of using food as a reward (the use of desired foods as a way to regulate the children’s eating or behaviors), three items of pressure to eat (insists, demands, or physical struggles with children to get the child to eat more food), and four items of monitoring (the degree of supervision over their children’s eating). Each item was worded in terms of the frequency of practice, and response options ranged from 1 (never) to 5 (always). Each subscale score was determined by calculating the average of all the items within that subscale. In this study, Cronbach’s alpha was 0.617–0.872.

2.3.4. Children’s Appetitive Traits

Children’s appetitive traits over the past month were measured using the Chinese Preschoolers’ Eating Behavior Questionnaire (CPEBQ) [29]. CPEBQ assesses two types of appetitive traits: five items of satiety responsiveness (children with small appetites get full quickly) and six items of food responsiveness (children’s tendency to seek food when they see or smell it). Each item was worded in terms of the frequency of practice, and response options ranged from 1 (never) to 5 (always). The score for each subscale was calculated as the mean of all the items included in that subscale. In the current study, Cronbach’s alpha of SR and FR was 0.680 and 0.734, respectively.

2.3.5. Demographic and Family-Related Variables

Demographic and family-related variables were collected using a self-reported questionnaire, including the children’s birth date, sex and parental age, weight, height, education level, family type, number of children, and annual household income. Parental BMI was calculated as weight (in kilograms) divided by the square of height (in meters).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The expectation–maximization algorithm (EM) was used for missing value imputation [30]. All the continuous variables followed a normal distribution. Mean and standard deviation (SD) and count and percentage were used to describe the continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) was used to identify potential subgroups within a population exhibiting distinct trajectories or change patterns [31]. The best-fit trajectory model was determined according to the following indices: (i) the Bayesian information criteria (BIC) (a smaller absolute value of BIC indicating a better model fit); (ii) fit statistics (the p-values of model parameters and the confidence intervals of trajectory estimates); (iii) the average posterior probability (AvePP; above 0.7 indicated optimal fit); (iv) the simplicity of the trajectories (a minimum sample size of at least 5% of each subgroup); (v) the interpretability of the trajectories. After determining the GBTM groups, a one-way analysis of variance or chi-square test was used for group comparisons. A multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to explore the factors associated with the different weight trajectories of preschool children. The associations were quantified using an odds ratio (OR) with a corresponding 95% CI. Data coding, cleaning, and statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 26.0 and Traj command [32] in Stata Statistics version 17.0. A two-tailed p < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Participants Characteristics

A total of 433 children were included in the study, with 232 males (53.6%) and 201 females (46.4%). At baseline, the mean age was 3.70 years (SD = 0.29), and the mean BMI score was 0.13 (SD = 0.88). The majority of the participants were mothers (n = 330, 76.2%). Most family types were stem families (living with grandparents, n = 356, 82.22%), and over half reported an annual income of more than RMB 300,000 (about USD 41,700) (n = 250, 57.73%) (Table 1).

3.2. Weight Trajectories of Preschool Children

The prevalence of underweight and overweight (including obesity) at T0 was 0.7% (n = 3) and 13.2% (n = 57), respectively. The rate of OWOB in the preschool children showed an upward trend in two annual follow-up visits (Figure 2). The model fitting indices indicated three BAZ trajectories among the 433 preschool children (Figure 3). (i) Group 1 (“low-stable”, n = 154, 37.3%) showed a stable and lower BAZ within the normal range. This group consistently maintained a BAZ ranging from −0.8 to −0.3 over two years, indicating that their weight remained consistently lower and stable. (ii) Group 2 (“moderate-stable”, n = 214, 47.3%) showed a stable and moderate BAZ. This group exhibited a consistent BAZ ranging from 0.2 to 0.5 over two years, indicating a stable weight within the normal range. (iii) Group 3 demonstrated a higher BAZ at baseline and maintained an upward trend over two years (“progressive overweight and obesity”, n = 65, 15.4%). This group was characterized by an increase in the BAZ from 1.3 at baseline, indicating that the weight was already overweight and continued to increase. In addition, the AvePP of these three trajectories were 0.92, 0.88, and 0.93, respectively. Details of the model fitting are shown in Table S1.

3.3. Univariate Analysis of Factors Influencing Weight Trajectories in Preschool Children

The three groups differed in demographic characteristics, parental feeding practices, and children’s appetitive traits. More children were perceived as underweight by their parents in the low-stable group than in the other two groups, and more children were perceived as overweight or obese by their parents in the progressive OWOB group (χ2 = 170.69, p < 0.01). The score of parental pressure to eat in the progressive OWOB group was lower than in the other two groups (F = 3.52, p = 0.03). The score of children’s food responsiveness in the progressive OWOB group was higher than in the other two groups (F = 10.85, p < 0.01), and the score of children’s satiety responsiveness was lower (F = 10.85, p < 0.01) (Table 2).

3.4. Multinomial Logistic Regression Analysis of Factors Influencing the Weight Trajectory of Preschool Children

Compared to girls, boys were more likely to be in the progressive OWOB group than in the moderate-stable group (OR = 3.01, 95%CI: 1.44–6.25), while the likelihood of being in the low-stable group was lower (OR = 0.54, 95%CI: 0.34–0.88). High maternal BMI was associated with lower odds of being in the low-stable group than in the moderate-stable group (OR = 0.87, 95%CI: 0.80–0.96). Compared to the children perceived as normal weight by their parents, the children perceived as underweight were more likely to fall in the low-stable trajectory than in the moderate-stable group (OR = 4.57, 95%CI: 2.71–7.70). The children perceived as overweight or obese by parents were more likely to be in the progressive OWOB group rather than the moderate stable group (OR = 10.57, 95%CI: 4.89–22.86). The preschool children with a lower satiety responsiveness score at baseline were more likely to be in the progressive OWOB group than in the moderate stable group (OR = 0.86, 95%CI: 0.76–0.97) (see Table 3). In contrast to the univariate analysis, parental pressure to eat was not linked to the children’s weight trajectories according to the multinomial logistic regression analysis (p = 0.26).

4. Discussion

This two-year longitudinal study identified three distinct BAZ trajectories among the preschool children. Nearly half of the preschool children were in the moderate-stable group. Approximately one-third of the children consistently exhibited low weight and were classified as the low-stable group. The remaining children with an upward trajectory of their weight were in the progressive OWOB group. The number of trajectories reported in the previous studies of BMI trajectories in childhood ranged from three to seven, with three or four being the most common in the literature [33,34]. Several factors contribute to the smaller number of trajectories identified in this study compared to previous research. First, we focused on the weight changes in the preschoolers over two years, which is relatively shorter than other studies. Second, our follow-up interval was one year, different from the other studies. Third, amid rapid economic growth in China, there has been a steady decrease in child malnutrition, paralleled by an increasing prevalence of OWOB. This study was conducted in urban areas with a developed economy, making it challenging to capture the weight change trajectory among underweight children.
This study showed that the child’s sex, maternal BMI, parental perception of children’s weight, and child’s satiety responsiveness at baseline were associated with the weight trajectory of the preschool children across two years. Specifically, compared with the moderate-stable group, boys were more likely than girls to be in the progressive OWOB group and less likely to be in the low-stable group. A large longitudinal survey (n = 16,060) in China [35] also indicated that boys were more likely to have unhealthy weight trajectories, including the trajectories of “persistent obesity” and “healthy weight to overweight and obesity”. The ideal body shape differs between boys and girls in mainstream Chinese society. In China, boys with a bigger body build are often perceived as strong and healthy, while girls are commonly expected to have a thinner and slender body shape [36,37]. Therefore, caregivers usually encourage boys to consume more food and restrict food intake for girls [38]. Parents might struggle to perceive accurately or may be unconcerned about their sons’ overweight status, leading them to maintain usual feeding practices that favor a muscular physique for boys [39].
In line with previous studies, our studies demonstrated a significant association between parental weight and their children’s weight [40,41]. In addition, previous research [42,43] has shown that mothers have a stronger influence on children’s BMI than fathers, which may be due to factors such as pregnancy experiences and the maternal role as the primary caregiver for children.
The parental perception of their children in OWOB was a risk factor for progressive OWOB in the preschool children. The children perceived as overweight or obese by their parents at baseline did not effectively control their weight during follow-up but instead showed an upward trend. It was similar to two longitudinal studies in the Netherlands and Australia [44,45], which found that the parental perception of children in OWOB was associated with more weight gain in children during later follow-ups.
There are several explanations for this finding. First, within the Chinese cultural context, being overweight or obese in early childhood is often viewed as a symbol of good health. Many parents believe that weight issues in children will resolve naturally with age. Under the influence of this deeply ingrained belief, even if parents perceive that their children are overweight or obese during preschool years, they may not worry about it and maintain their original parenting practices [46,47], which may ultimately lead to a continued increase in their children’s weight. Secondly, due to weight stigma, the parents of children with OWOB may experience feeding-related stress, including concerns about their children’s health and social evaluation [48,49].
However, this concern rarely translates into healthier and more reasonable feeding practices or dietary structures within the family; instead, parents tend to adopt nonresponsive parenting—such as restricting high-calorie foods and urging children to exercise [50,51]—this type of parenting damages children’s ability to self-regulate their energy intake and expenditure. For example, children tend to consume more restricted foods or disrupt their satiety signals [52,53].
The appetitive traits directly impacted weight trajectories, where lower SR in the preschool children was associated with a progressive weight trajectory of OWOB. Overall, this study aligned with the findings of Demir and Lin [54,55], who identified FR and SR as influencing factors in childhood obesity among 1201 school-aged children. Consequently, this mechanism may increase the likelihood of unhealthy weight outcomes in children. However, this study showed that FR was not associated with the children’s weight trajectories. Indeed, parents usually determine the type and amount of food their children intake, so children’s food responsiveness is relatively limited.
Parental pressure to eat (one of the feeding practices) was found to show statistical differences among the three BAZ trajectories by the univariate analyses, but such differences were no longer significant when accounting for other variables (e.g., parental weight perception and children’s appetitive traits). We speculated that newly introduced variables (parental weight perception and children’s appetitive traits) could have a direct or strong connection to children’s weight [19,20], which interfered with the relationship between parental pressure to eat and children’s weight change. To some extent, our findings may elucidate the reason for the inconsistent results in previous research regarding the relationships between feeding practices and children’s weight—child and parental factors related to child weight were considered differently. Future studies are informed to comprehensively examine children’s and parents’ characteristics for elucidating the role of parental feeding practices in children’s weight development.
This study has several limitations. First, this study focused on weight changes in preschool children over two years, which did not cover the entire preschool period. We may be restricted to revealing the complete trajectories of weight change across the preschool years. Second, children’s weight was also influenced by physical activity, sleep, and sedentary behaviors [12], which was not examined as this was beyond the objectives of this study. Third, this study used self-reported data from the caregivers of preschool children to measure feeding practice and child appetitive traits, which may introduce reporter bias. Finally, we used convenience sampling to survey preschool children and their parents from the same urban area. Among this study population, more than half of the households belong to single-child families, where grandparents actively participate in child-rearing, and their feeding practice may also impact childhood weight changes. Additionally, the majority of the families included in this study were highly educated and earned a high annual income, which may influence the generalizability of this study.

5. Conclusions

Preschool children are in a critical stage of growth and development, with individual variations in weight trajectory. This study identified three distinct weight trajectories: “low-stable group”, “moderate-stable group”, and “progressive overweight and obesity group”. Parental characteristics (self-reported BMI and parental perception of children’s weight) and children’s characteristics (sex and appetitive traits) were related to the weight trajectories. Male children, those perceived as OWOB by parents, and those with low satiety responsiveness were at greater risk of following a progressive OWOB trajectory. However, this study did not find an association between feeding practices and weight trajectories in children. By identifying the intrinsic and extrinsic factors associated with weight gain in children, personalized precision health management programs can be developed and tested for the high-risk population of children in OWOB.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu16213746/s1. Table S1: Fit indices in group-based trajectory model (GBTM).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Y.C. (Yujia Chen), F.Q. and D.Z.; data curation: Y.C. (Yujia Chen), F.Q. and D.Z.; formal analysis: Y.C. (Yujia Chen), F.Q., X.S., D.Z. and Y.C. (Yang Cao); investigation: Y.C. (Yujia Chen), F.Q., X.W., X.S., R.W., J.W., X.T. and D.Z.; methodology: D.Z., Y.C. (Yujia Chen) and F.Q.; project administration: D.Z. and X.T.; resources: D.Z. and X.T.; software: Y.C. (Yujia Chen); supervision: D.Z., Y.C. (Yang Cao), N.G., and W.H.; visualization: Y.C. (Yujia Chen) and F.Q.; writing—original draft: Y.C. (Yujia Chen) and F.Q.; writing—review and editing: Y.C. (Yujia Chen), F.Q., D.Z., N.G., W.H. and Y.C. (Yang Cao). Y.C. (Yujia Chen) and F.Q. contributed equally to this manuscript and should be considered co-first authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

It was supported by a grant from the National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 19BSH070).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (registration number: SJUPN-201908, Approval Date: 3 Dec 2019). No identifying participant information was collected for the purpose of this study, and informed consent was obtained from all the participants before study participation.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available upon request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge all the participants for their participation and cooperation during data collection. In addition, we would like to express our gratitude to all the child healthcare professionals at Jinyang Community Health Service Center in the study area for their contributions to data collection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

BAZ: body mass index-for-age z-score; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; BMI: body mass index; OWOB: overweight and obesity; FR: food responsiveness; SR: satiety responsiveness; GBTM: group-based trajectory modeling; CPCFBS: Chinese Preschooler’s Caregivers’ Feeding Behavior Scale; C-CFQ: Chinese version of the Child Feeding Questionnaire; CPEBQ: Chinese Preschoolers’ Eating Behavior Questionnaire; EM: expectation–maximization algorithm; SD: standard deviation; BIC: Bayesian information criteria; AvePP: average posterior probability.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Levels and Trends in Child Malnutrition: UNICEF/WHO/The World Bank Group Joint Child Malnutrition Estimates: Key Findings of the 2023 Edition. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240073791 (accessed on 30 December 2023).
  2. The State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China. Press Briefing for the Report on Chinese Residents’ Chronic Diseases and Nutrition 2020. Available online: http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2020-12/24/content_5572983.htm (accessed on 30 December 2023).
  3. Kumar, S.; Kelly, A.S. Review of Childhood Obesity: From Epidemiology, Etiology, and Comorbidities to Clinical Assessment and Treatment. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2017, 92, 251–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Weihrauch-Blüher, S.; Schwarz, P.; Klusmann, J.H. Childhood obesity: Increased risk for cardiometabolic disease and cancer in adulthood. Metab. Clin. Exp. 2019, 92, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Smith, J.D.; Fu, E.; Kobayashi, M.A. Prevention and Management of Childhood Obesity and Its Psychological and Health Comorbidities. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 2020, 16, 351–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shi, C.; Li, N.; Dong, J.; Wang, L.; Li, X.; Ji, C.; Wang, X.; Chi, X.; Guo, X.; Tong, M.; et al. Association between maternal nonresponsive feeding practice and child’s eating behavior and weight status: Children aged 1 to 6 years. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2017, 176, 1603–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tung, H.J.; Yeh, M.C. Parenting style and child-feeding behaviour in predicting children’s weight status change in Taiwan. Public Health Nutr. 2014, 17, 970–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Shloim, N.; Edelson, L.R.; Martin, N.; Hetherington, M.M. Parenting Styles, Feeding Styles, Feeding Practices, and Weight Status in 4–12 Year-Old Children: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Front. Psychol. 2015, 6, 1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hughes, S.O.; Power, T.G.; O’Connor, T.M.; Orlet Fisher, J.; Chen, T.A. Maternal Feeding Styles and Food Parenting Practices as Predictors of Longitudinal Changes in Weight Status in Hispanic Preschoolers from Low-Income Families. J. Obes. 2016, 2016, 7201082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Yuan, J.; Jiang, X.; Zhu, T.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yang, X.; Shang, L. Caregivers’ feeding behaviour, children’s eating behaviour and weight status among children of preschool age in China. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. Off. J. Br. Diet. Assoc. 2021, 34, 807–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Lee, E.Y.; Yoon, K.H. Epidemic obesity in children and adolescents: Risk factors and prevention. Front. Med. 2018, 12, 658–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jebeile, H.; Kelly, A.S.; O’Malley, G.; Baur, L.A. Obesity in children and adolescents: Epidemiology, causes, assessment, and management. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022, 10, 351–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Brown, C.L.; Ip, E.H.; Skelton, J.; Lucas, C.; Vitolins, M.Z. Parental concerns about picky eating and undereating, feeding practices, and child’s weight. Obes. Res. Clin. Pract. 2022, 16, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Beckers, D.; Karssen, L.T.; Vink, J.M.; Burk, W.J.; Larsen, J.K. Food parenting practices and children’s weight outcomes: A systematic review of prospective studies. Appetite 2021, 158, 105010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Llewellyn, C.H.; Fildes, A. Behavioural Susceptibility Theory: Professor Jane Wardle and the Role of Appetite in Genetic Risk of Obesity. Curr. Obes. Rep. 2017, 6, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Llewellyn, C.H.; Kininmonth, A.R.; Herle, M.; Nas, Z.; Smith, A.D.; Carnell, S.; Fildes, A. Behavioural susceptibility theory: The role of appetite in genetic susceptibility to obesity in early life. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 2023, 378, 20220223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Russell, C.G.; Russell, A. A biopsychosocial approach to processes and pathways in the development of overweight and obesity in childhood: Insights from developmental theory and research. Obes. Rev. Off. J. Int. Assoc. Study Obes. 2019, 20, 725–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Papaioannou, M.A.; Micheli, N.; Power, T.G.; Fisher, J.O.; Hughes, S.O. Associations Between Independent Assessments of Child Appetite Self-Regulation: A Narrative Review. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 810912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Costa, A.; Severo, M.; Vilela, S.; Fildes, A.; Oliveira, A. Bidirectional relationships between appetitive behaviours and body mass index in childhood: A cross-lagged analysis in the Generation XXI birth cohort. Eur. J. Nutr. 2021, 60, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Francis, L.A.; Rollins, B.Y.; Keller, K.L.; Nix, R.L.; Savage, J.S. Profiles of Behavioral Self-Regulation and Appetitive Traits in Preschool Children: Associations with BMI and Food Parenting Practices. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 796580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhou, N.; Cheah, C.S.; Van Hook, J.; Thompson, D.A.; Jones, S.S. A cultural understanding of Chinese immigrant mothers’ feeding practices. A qualitative study. Appetite 2015, 87, 160–167. [Google Scholar]
  22. Wang, G.H.; Tan, T.X.; Cheah, C.S. Preschool-Age Chinese Children’s Weight Status: WHO Classification, Parent Ratings, Child/Family Characteristics. J. Pediatr. Nurs. 2017, 33, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, J.; Zhu, D.; Cheng, X.; Liuzhou, Y.; Zhu, B.; Montgomery, S.; Cao, Y. Maternal perception of child weight and concern about child overweight mediates the relationship between child weight and feeding practices. Public Health Nutr. 2022, 25, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Min, J.; Wang, V.H.; Xue, H.; Mi, J.; Wang, Y. Maternal perception of child overweight status and its association with weight-related parenting practices, their children’s health behaviours and weight change in China. Public Health Nutr. 2017, 20, 2096–2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO Child Growth Standards based on length/height, weight and age. Acta Paediatr. Suppl. 2006, 450, 76–85. [Google Scholar]
  26. Birch, L.L.; Fisher, J.O.; Grimm-Thomas, K.; Markey, C.N.; Sawyer, R.; Johnson, S.L. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Child Feeding Questionnaire: A measure of parental attitudes, beliefs and practices about child feeding and obesity proneness. Appetite 2001, 36, 201–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yuan, J.; Zhang, H.; Xu, T.; Yang, X.; Yu, L.; Jiang, X.; Shang, L. Development and evaluation of Preschooler ′ s Parents Feeding Behavior Scale. Chin. J. Child Health Care 2018, 26, 483–487. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lixia, Z.; Daoping, S.; Chulin, C.; Fangfang, L.; Daquai, Z. Reliability and validity of a Chinese version of Child Feeding Questionnaire among parents of preschoolers. Chin. J. Child Health Care 2016, 24, 1019–1023. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hao, Z.; Xianjun, Y.; Xun, J.; Jing, Y.; Tong, X.; Lei, S. Reevaluation of the Preschool Children Eating Behavior Questionnaire based on multidimensional item response theory. Chin. J. Child Health Care 2019, 27, 236–240. [Google Scholar]
  30. Musil, C.M.; Warner, C.B.; Yobas, P.K.; Jones, S.L. A comparison of imputation techniques for handling missing data. West. J. Nurs. Res. 2002, 24, 815–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nagin, D. Group-Based Modeling of Development; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  32. Nagin, D.S.; Jones, B.L.; Passos, V.L.; Tremblay, R.E. Group-based multi-trajectory modeling. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 2018, 27, 2015–2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mattsson, M.; Maher, G.M.; Boland, F.; Fitzgerald, A.P.; Murray, D.M.; Biesma, R. Group-based trajectory modelling for BMI trajectories in childhood: A systematic review. Obes. Rev. Off. J. Int. Assoc. Study Obes. 2019, 20, 998–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chang, C.L.; Ali, G.B.; Pham, J.; Dharmage, S.C.; Lodge, C.J.; Tang, M.L.K.; Lowe, A.J. Childhood body mass index trajectories and asthma and allergies: A systematic review. Clin. Exp. Allergy J. Br. Soc. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2023, 53, 911–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhou, Y.; Yu, P.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, T.; Wang, A. Distinct Patterns of Urban-Rural and Sex Disparities in Children’s BMI Trajectories From 2013 to 2018. Front. Public Health 2021, 9, 689021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Gao, L.; Ma, L.; Xue, H.; Min, J.; Wang, H.; Wang, Y. A 3-year longitudinal study of effects of parental perception of children’s ideal body image on child weight change: The Childhood Obesity Study in China mega-cities. Prev. Med. 2020, 132, 105971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Jiang, J.; Rosenqvist, U.; Wang, H.; Greiner, T.; Lian, G.; Sarkadi, A. Influence of grandparents on eating behaviors of young children in Chinese three-generation families. Appetite 2007, 48, 377–383. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Qiu, C.; Hatton, R.; Li, Q.; Xv, J.; Li, J.; Tian, J.; Yuan, S.; Hou, M. Associations of parental feeding practices with children’s eating behaviors and food preferences: A Chinese cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatr. 2023, 23, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Warkentin, S.; Mais, L.A.; Latorre, M.; Carnell, S.; Taddei, J. Factors associated with parental underestimation of child’s weight status. J. Pediatr. 2018, 94, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Heslehurst, N.; Vieira, R.; Akhter, Z.; Bailey, H.; Slack, E.; Ngongalah, L.; Pemu, A.; Rankin, J. The association between maternal body mass index and child obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2019, 16, e1002817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mannino, A.; Sarapis, K.; Moschonis, G. The Effect of Maternal Overweight and Obesity Pre- Pregnancy and During Childhood in the Development of Obesity in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Literature Review. Nutrients 2022, 14, 5125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Xu, R.Y.; Zhou, Y.Q.; Zhang, X.M.; Wan, Y.P.; Gao, X. A two-year study of parental obesity status and childhood obesity in China. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2019, 29, 260–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Linabery, A.M.; Nahhas, R.W.; Johnson, W.; Choh, A.C.; Towne, B.; Odegaard, A.O.; Czerwinski, S.A.; Demerath, E.W. Stronger influence of maternal than paternal obesity on infant and early childhood body mass index: The Fels Longitudinal Study. Pediatr. Obes. 2013, 8, 159–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Robinson, E.; Sutin, A.R. Parental Perception of Weight Status and Weight Gain Across Childhood. Pediatrics 2016, 137, e20153957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Carrillo-Larco, R.M.; Bernabe-Ortiz, A.; Miranda, J.J.; Xue, H.; Wang, Y. Children’s weight changes according to maternal perception of the child’s weight and health: A prospective cohort of Peruvian children. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0175685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yisahak, S.F.; Khalsa, A.S.; Keim, S.A. Caregiver Concern About Child Overweight/Obesity in Grandparent Versus Parent-Headed Households in the United States. Acad. Pediatr. 2023, 23, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kenney, M.K.; Lebrun-Harris, L.A.; Vladutiu, C.J.; Kogan, M.D. Parental Concerns About Child Weight Among 10-17-Year Olds With Overweight/Obesity: A Family Ecological Model. Acad. Pediatr. 2021, 21, 1055–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Eli, K.; Neovius, C.; Nordin, K.; Brissman, M.; Ek, A. Parents’ experiences following conversations about their young child’s weight in the primary health care setting: A study within the STOP project. BMC Public Health 2022, 22, 1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gorlick, J.C.; Gorman, C.V.; Weeks, H.M.; Pearlman, A.T.; Schvey, N.A.; Bauer, K.W. “I Feel Like Less of a Mom”: Experiences of Weight Stigma by Association among Mothers of Children with Overweight and Obesity. Child. Obes. 2021, 17, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Haines, J.; Downing, K.L.; Tang, L.; Campbell, K.J.; Hesketh, K.D. Associations between maternal concern about child’s weight and related behaviours and maternal weight-related parenting practices: A cross-sectional study. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2018, 15, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Gold, J.M.; Vander Weg, M.W. Investigating the relationship between parental weight stigma and feeding practices. Appetite 2020, 149, 104635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rollins, B.Y.; Loken, E.; Savage, J.S.; Birch, L.L. Effects of restriction on children’s intake differ by child temperament, food reinforcement, and parent’s chronic use of restriction. Appetite 2014, 73, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Vollmer, R.L.; Baietto, J. Practices and preferences: Exploring the relationships between food- related parenting practices and child food preferences for high fat and/or sugar foods, fruits, and vegetables. Appetite 2017, 113, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Demir, D.; Bektas, M. The effect of childrens’ eating behaviors and parental feeding style on childhood obesity. Eat. Behav. 2017, 26, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Lin, Q.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, G.; Sun, W.; Dong, S.; Deng, Y.; Meng, M.; Zhu, Q.; Mei, H.; Zhou, Y.; et al. Combined effects of weight change trajectories and eating behaviors on childhood adiposity status: A birth cohort study. Appetite 2021, 162, 105174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Flow chart of the study participants.
Figure 1. Flow chart of the study participants.
Nutrients 16 03746 g001
Figure 2. The distribution of the actual body weight classifications among the preschool children at each follow-up time point.
Figure 2. The distribution of the actual body weight classifications among the preschool children at each follow-up time point.
Nutrients 16 03746 g002
Figure 3. BAZ trajectories of the preschool children. Footnote: BAZ: body mass index-for-age z-score. The solid lines (blue: low-stable group; green: moderate-stable group; red: progressive overweight and obesity group) mean estimated values, and the dotted lines display the 95% CIs. The yellow zone indicates the range of the normal weight of the children (−2 ≤ BAZ ≤ 1).
Figure 3. BAZ trajectories of the preschool children. Footnote: BAZ: body mass index-for-age z-score. The solid lines (blue: low-stable group; green: moderate-stable group; red: progressive overweight and obesity group) mean estimated values, and the dotted lines display the 95% CIs. The yellow zone indicates the range of the normal weight of the children (−2 ≤ BAZ ≤ 1).
Nutrients 16 03746 g003
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the participants.
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the participants.
VariablesCategoriesIncluded (n = 433)Excluded (n = 180)t or χ2 p-Value
Child characteristic
Age (years), M (SD) 3.70 (0.29)3.71 (0.45)−0.31 a0.76
Sex, N (%)Male Female232 (53.58) 201 (46.42)84 (46.67) 96 (53.33)2.430.12
BAZ, M (SD) 0.13 (0.88)0.17 (1.00)−0.470.64
Yes166 (38.34)72 (40.00)
Presence of siblings, N (%)No267 (61.66)108 (60.00)0.150.70
<6107 (29.40)53 (29.44)
Breastfeeding time (months), N (%)6~12211 (47.78)80 (44.44)1.590.45
>12115 (22.82)47 (26.11)
Parental perception of childPerceived underweight119 (27.48)50 (27.78)
weight, NPerceived normal weight257 (59.35)105 (58.33)0.080.96
(%)Perceived OWOB57 (13.16)25 (13.89)
Child MSatiety responsiveness2.71 (0.64)2.72 (0.62)−0.23 a0.82
appetitive traits, (SD)Food responsiveness2.48 (0.56)2.50 (0.57)−0.37 a0.71
Family characteristic
NMother330 (76.21)140 (77.78)
Primary caregiver, (%)Father103 (23.79)40 (22.22)0.170.68
Stem family356 (82.22)139 (77.22)
Family type, N (%)Nuclear family68 (15.70)40 (22.22)5.270.07
Other types9 (2.08)1 (0.56)
Father’s age, M (SD) 36.54 (4.65)36.45 (4.73)0.20 a0.84
Mother’s age, M (SD) 34.55 (3.88)34.51 (3.76)0.12 a0.90
Father’s BMI, M (SD) 24.30 (3.00)24.54 (3.06)−0.88 a0.38
Mother’s BMI, M (SD) 21.43 (2.79)21.38 (2.65)0.19 a0.85
Content-restricted feeding3.52 (0.76)3.43 (0.79)1.35 a0.18
Encouraging healthy eating4.10 (0.65)4.06 (0.48)0.75 a0.45
Parental feeding practices, MBehavior-restricted feeding4.10 (0.59)4.05 (0.60)0.84 a0.40
(SD)Food as a reward3.33 (0.79)3.35 (0.79)−0.36 a0.72
Pressure to eat3.28 (0.78)3.19 (0.81)1.37 a0.17
Monitoring4.15 (0.75)4.03 (0.84)1.71 a0.09
Senior high school or below40 (9.24)14 (7.78)
Father’s education level, N (%)College or above393 (90.76)157 (86.22)0.170.68
Mother’s education level, N (%)Senior high school or below college or above41 (2.90) 391 (90.52)15 (8.33) 157 (86.22)0.080.77
Annual household income, N (%)< RMB 300,000 > RMB 300,000 183 (42.26) 250 (57.73)66 (36.67) 100 (55.56)0.210.58
Footnote: M—mean; SD—standard deviation; N—number of cases; χ2—chi-square test; t—t-test; a—t value.
Table 2. Univariate analysis of the trajectory of weight in the preschool children.
Table 2. Univariate analysis of the trajectory of weight in the preschool children.
Low-Stable Group (n = 154)Moderate-Stable Group (n = 214)Progressive OWOB Group (n = 65)F or χ2 p-Value
Child characteristic
Male73 (47.40)118 (55.14)41 (63.08)4.930.09
Sex, N (%)Female81 (52.60)96 (44.86)24 (36.92)
Age (years),M (SD)3.72 (0.28)3.68 (0.30)3.72 (0.29)1.11 b0.33
BAZ,M (SD)−0.66 (0.47)0.32 (0.56)1.38 (0.64)350.72 b<0.01
Underweight3 (1.95)00166.24<0.01
Actual weight level, N (%)Normal weight151 (98.05)197 (92.06)25 (38.46)
OWOB017 (7.94)40 (61.54)
Presence of siblings, N (%)Yes60 (38.96)77 (35.98)29 (44.62)1.610.44
No94 (61.04)137 (64.02)36 (55.38)
Breastfeeding time (months), N (%)<636 (23.38)62 (28.97)9 (13.85)7.500.11
6~1277 (50.00)101 (47.20)33 (50.77)
>1241 (26.62)51 (23.83)23 (35.38)
Parental perception of child weight, N (%)Perceived underweight82 (53.25)37 (17.29)0170.69<0.01
Perceived normal weight71 (46.10)155 (72.43)31 (47.69)
Perceived OWOB1 (0.65)22 (10.28)34 (52.31)
Child appetitive traits, M (SD)Satiety responsiveness2.85 (0.66)2.71 (0.61)2.43 (0.59)10.40<0.01
Food responsiveness2.33 (0.58)2.53 (0.55)2.69 (0.49)10.85 b<0.01
Family characteristic
Primary caregiver, N (%)Mother116 (75.33)161 (75.23)53 (81.54)1.200.55
Father38 (24.67)53 (24.77)12 (18.46)
Family type, N (%)Stem family126 (81.82)181 (84.58)49 (75.38)3.740.44
Nuclear family24 (15.58)29 (13.55)15 (23.08)
Other types4 (2.60)4 (1.87)1 (1.54)
Father’s age, M (SD) 36.47 (4.63)36.37 (4.74)37.42 (4.36)1.37ᵇ0.25
Mother’s age, M (SD) 34.63 (4.04)34.31 (3.87)35.17 (3.53)1.28 b0.28
Father’s BMI, M (SD) 23.73 (2.86)24.54 (3.08)24.89 (2.92)4.73 b<0.01
Mother’s BMI, M (SD) 20.80 (2.79)21.72 (2.75)21.96 (2.69)6.46b<0.01
Content-restricted feeding3.43 (0.74)3.58 (0.77)3.57 (0.78)1.83 b0.16
Parental feeding practices, M (SD)Encouraging healthy eating4.11 (0.48)4.08 (0.48)4.14 (0.56)0.48 b0.62
Behavior- restricted feeding4.14 (0.58)4.07 (0.59)4.07 (0.59)0.68 b0.51
Food as a reward3.31 (0.75)3.37 (0.81)3.26 (0.82)0.58 b0.56
Pressure to eat3.40 (0.76)3.25 (0.78)3.12 (0.75)3.52b0.03
Monitoring4.14 (0.67)4.17 (0.81)4.11 (0.74)0.21 b0.81
Father’s education level, N (%)Senior high school or below16 (10.39)19 (8.88)5 (7.69)0.460.79
College or above138 (89.61)195 (91.12)60 (92.31)
Mother’s education level, N (%)Senior high school or below14 (9.09)21 (9.86)6 (9.23)0.070.97
College or above140 (90.91)192 (90.14)59 (90.73)
Annual household income, N (%)< RMB 300,000 60 (38.96)93 (43.46)30 (46.15)1.220.54
> RMB 300,000 94 (61.04)121 (56.54)35 (53.85)
Footnote: M—mean; SD—standard deviation; N—number of cases; χ2—chi-square test, F—one-way ANOVA; b—F value. Estimates significant at p < 0.05 are in bold.
Table 3. Multinomial logistic analysis of the factors influencing the BAZ trajectory of the preschool children.
Table 3. Multinomial logistic analysis of the factors influencing the BAZ trajectory of the preschool children.
VariablesBSEWald χ2p-ValueOR (95% CI)
Low-stable group
GenderGirlsRef.
Boys−0.610.246.220.010.54 (0.34, 0.88)
Father’s BMI−0.050.041.210.270.96 (0.88, 1.04)
Mother’s BMI−0.140.058.44<0.010.87 (0.80,0.96)
Parental perception of child weight Perceived normal weight Ref.
Perceived underweight1.520.2632.35<0.014.57 (2.71, 7.70)
Perceived OWOB−2.441.045.490.020.09 (0.01, 0.67)
Pressure to eat−0.020.040.120.730.99 (0.91, 1.07)
Satiety responsiveness0.010.040.050.821.01 (0.93, 1.10)
Food responsiveness−0.070.043.040.080.94 (0.87, 1.01)
Progressive OWOB group
GenderGirls Ref.
Boys1.100.378.67<0.013.01 (1.44, 6.25)
Father’s BMI0.010.060.020.891.01 (0.90, 1.12)
Mother’s BMI0.060.061.070.301.06 (0.95, 1.19)
Parental perception of child weight Perceived normal weight Ref.
Perceived underweight−14.310.3048.77<0.010.02 (−14.89, −13.73)
Perceived OWOB2.360.3935.91<0.0110.57 (4.89, 22.86)
Pressure to eat0.060.061.280.261.07 (0.96, 1.19)
Satiety responsiveness−0.160.066.440.010.86 (0.76, 0.97)
Food responsiveness0.060.051.300.251.06 (0.96, 1.18)
Footnote: B—coefficient; SE—standard error; Wald χ2—Wald chi-square test; OR—odds ratio; CI—confidence interval; BMI—body mass index; OWOB—overweight and obesity. Girls and Perceived normal weight were used as the reference category. All multinomial logistic regression models used the Moderate-stable group as the reference group. Estimates significant at p < 0.05 are in bold.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, Y.; Qu, F.; Wei, X.; Song, X.; Wu, R.; Wang, J.; Cao, Y.; Guo, N.; Hua, W.; Tang, X.; et al. Parental Feeding Practices, Weight Perception, and Children’s Appetitive Traits Are Associated with Weight Trajectories in Preschoolers: A Longitudinal Study in China. Nutrients 2024, 16, 3746. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16213746

AMA Style

Chen Y, Qu F, Wei X, Song X, Wu R, Wang J, Cao Y, Guo N, Hua W, Tang X, et al. Parental Feeding Practices, Weight Perception, and Children’s Appetitive Traits Are Associated with Weight Trajectories in Preschoolers: A Longitudinal Study in China. Nutrients. 2024; 16(21):3746. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16213746

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Yujia, Fangge Qu, Xiaoxue Wei, Xinyi Song, Ruxing Wu, Jian Wang, Yang Cao, Ningyuan Guo, Wenzhe Hua, Xianqing Tang, and et al. 2024. "Parental Feeding Practices, Weight Perception, and Children’s Appetitive Traits Are Associated with Weight Trajectories in Preschoolers: A Longitudinal Study in China" Nutrients 16, no. 21: 3746. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16213746

APA Style

Chen, Y., Qu, F., Wei, X., Song, X., Wu, R., Wang, J., Cao, Y., Guo, N., Hua, W., Tang, X., & Zhu, D. (2024). Parental Feeding Practices, Weight Perception, and Children’s Appetitive Traits Are Associated with Weight Trajectories in Preschoolers: A Longitudinal Study in China. Nutrients, 16(21), 3746. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16213746

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop