Next Article in Journal
Novel Biomarkers of Bone Metabolism
Previous Article in Journal
Vitamin D Status and Reference Intervals Measured by Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry for the Early Adulthood to Geriatric Ages in a South Korean Population during 2017–2022
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Clustered Cardiometabolic Risk and the “Fat but Fit Paradox” in Adolescents: Cross-Sectional Study

by
Noelia González-Gálvez
,
Ana Belén López-Martínez
* and
Abraham López-Vivancos
Facultad del Deporte, UCAM Universidad Católica de Murcia, 30107 Murcia, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2024, 16(5), 606; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16050606
Submission received: 16 January 2024 / Revised: 6 February 2024 / Accepted: 13 February 2024 / Published: 22 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Sports Nutrition)

Abstract

The “fat but fit paradox” states that people who are fit have a lower cluster cardiometabolic risk (CCMR), even if they are overweight or obese. Therefore, the objective was to investigate the CCMR between four categories based on the “fat but fit paradox” variable, in different fitness categories—cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular fitness, and physical fitness—in adolescents. Body composition, cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle fitness, blood samples, and blood pressure were assessed in 230 adolescents, and cardiometabolic risk and three different “fat but fit paradox” variables were calculated. Participants with a higher CRF exhibited a lower CCMR within their body mass index (BMI) category (p < 0.05). Participants with a high BMI and high muscular fitness showed a lower CCMR than participants with a low muscular fitness and a similar BMI, or low BMI and low muscular fitness (p < 0.05). When both variables, CRF and muscular fitness, were combined, their effectabove CCMR increased (p < 0.05). Across all fitness categories, the fat and unfit group, whether considered individually or combined, exhibited the highest risk of CCMR (p < 0.05). This study confirms the “fat but fit paradox” in different physical fitness categories, showing the importance of both CRF and muscular fitness as predictors of CCMR, with the combination of both variables showing a greater agreement.
Keywords: overweight; obesity; fitness; cardiorespiratory; children; school; blood pressure; diabetes; cholesterol overweight; obesity; fitness; cardiorespiratory; children; school; blood pressure; diabetes; cholesterol

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

González-Gálvez, N.; López-Martínez, A.B.; López-Vivancos, A. Clustered Cardiometabolic Risk and the “Fat but Fit Paradox” in Adolescents: Cross-Sectional Study. Nutrients 2024, 16, 606. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16050606

AMA Style

González-Gálvez N, López-Martínez AB, López-Vivancos A. Clustered Cardiometabolic Risk and the “Fat but Fit Paradox” in Adolescents: Cross-Sectional Study. Nutrients. 2024; 16(5):606. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16050606

Chicago/Turabian Style

González-Gálvez, Noelia, Ana Belén López-Martínez, and Abraham López-Vivancos. 2024. "Clustered Cardiometabolic Risk and the “Fat but Fit Paradox” in Adolescents: Cross-Sectional Study" Nutrients 16, no. 5: 606. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16050606

APA Style

González-Gálvez, N., López-Martínez, A. B., & López-Vivancos, A. (2024). Clustered Cardiometabolic Risk and the “Fat but Fit Paradox” in Adolescents: Cross-Sectional Study. Nutrients, 16(5), 606. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16050606

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop