Next Article in Journal
Lipophilic Micronutrients and Adipose Tissue Biology
Next Article in Special Issue
Vitamin D — Effects on Skeletal and Extraskeletal Health and the Need for Supplementation
Previous Article in Journal
How Feasible Is Baby-Led Weaning as an Approach to Infant Feeding? A Review of the Evidence
Previous Article in Special Issue
Plant Calcium Content: Ready to Remodel
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 4
Issue 11
10.3390/nu4111610
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Vitamin D Interactions with Soy Isoflavones on Bone after Menopause: A Review

by
Clara Y. Park
and
Connie M. Weaver
*
Department of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, 700 W State St, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2012, 4(11), 1610-1621; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu4111610
Submission received: 17 August 2012 / Revised: 26 October 2012 / Accepted: 30 October 2012 / Published: 6 November 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dietary Minerals)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Vitamin D is known to increase Ca absorption in adults. However, the threshold vitamin D status to benefit Ca absorption is lower than the target vitamin D status for higher bone mineral density and lower fracture risk, pointing to another pathway for vitamin D to benefit bone. One possibility is by affecting osteoblast and osteoclasts directly. Vitamin D-related bone metabolism may also be affected by soy isoflavones, which selectively bind to the estrogen receptor β and may reduce bone loss in postmenopausal women. We discuss a possible synergistic effect of soy isoflavones and vitamin D on bone by affecting osteoblast and osteoclast formation and activity in postmenopausal women.

1. Introduction

Osteoporosis, “the thinning of the bone tissue and loss of bone density over time” [1], is a major cause of fractures that accompany morbidity and complications that lead to death, especially in older people. Twenty-four percent of women over 50 years who experience hip fractures die within one year [2]. Even for those who survive, quality of life drastically decreases as most become home-bound or require support for daily activities. In the United States, approximately 10 million people were affected by osteoporosis in 2006, and the rate of hospitalization involving injury likely due to osteoporosis increased 55% in 2006 since 1995 [3]. Osteoporosis-related fracture costs in 2005 were estimated at $19 billion and this figure is estimated to increase to $25.3 billion by 2025 [2].
Older adults, especially postmenopausal women, are more susceptible to osteoporosis due to estrogen deficiency which promotes bone resorption and inadequate intake of calcium (Ca) and vitamin D, two important nutrients to protect bone health [4]. The traditionally known mechanism for vitamin D to benefit Ca metabolism is through increasing Ca absorption. However, recent data and meta-analyses reveal that the vitamin D level that benefits Ca absorption is inconsistent with the level that optimizes bone mineral density (BMD), which is directly correlated to osteoporosis and hip fracture risk [5]. Similar to Ca and vitamin D, other nutrients may also have an interactive effect on bone health, especially during estrogen deficiency. One proposed mechanism of vitamin D benefiting BMD may be through a synergistic effect with phytoestrogens. In this review, we will briefly discuss the knowledge gaps and possible mechanisms of vitamin D and phytoestrogens on bone health. Among the wide variety of phytoestrogens, we will focus on soy isoflavones genistein and daidzein, as relatively more research has been reported on these compounds.

2. Vitamin D and Ca Absorption

The effect of vitamin D on Ca absorption has been well understood and thought to be the major pathway to affect bone health. Vitamin D can be obtained through oral intake or cutaneous synthesis when UV reacts with 7-dehydrocholesterol. Vitamin D is converted to 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) in the liver. 25(OH)D is known to be the status marker of vitamin D, due to its longer (3–4 weeks) half-life. Parathyroid hormone (PTH) and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D), the active form of vitamin D, signal the regulation of Ca homeostasis. Ca metabolism is traditionally known to be regulated mainly through absorption, reabsorption, and resorption in the intestine, kidney, and bone, respectively, primarily to control serum Ca concentration. When Ca intake is low, the drop in serum Ca concentration is detected by the calcium sensing receptors on the parathyroid gland. This triggers parathyroid hormone secretion, which induces hydroxylation of 25(OH)D to 1,25(OH)2D, bone resorption, and renal reabsorption of Ca. Elevated serum 1,25(OH)2D levels stimulate the transcription of genes regulating Ca absorption in the intestine, such as TRPV6, calbindinD9k, and PMCA1b [6], and reabsorption in the kidney, i.e., TRPV5 and TRPV6, calbindinD28k and PMCA. The effect of 1,25(OH)2D on intestinal gene transcription is more effective than renal gene transcription, and consequently Ca absorption is more affected by circulating 1,25(OH)2D than reabsorption. As vitamin D and 25(OH)D are precursors of 1,25(OH)2D, it is thought that higher vitamin D intake and higher serum 25(OH)D status, indicating adequate substrate for 1,25(OH)2D production, will lead to increased Ca absorption. As a result, when dosed orally or subcutaneously with 1,25(OH)2D, Ca absorption increased in rats and humans [7,8]. Increased 1,25(OH)2D and serum Ca concentration provide a negative feedback on PTH release so that serum Ca concentration is maintained within a tight window. Once serum Ca is maintained, excess Ca from absorption is deposited in the bones or excreted through urine as PTH is suppressed. Through this process, vitamin D can stimulate Ca absorption, the primary step to increase BMD.
Clinical trials have pointed to a threshold 25(OH)D level of ~20 nmol/L to maximize vitamin D-mediated Ca absorption in adults. Previous research using crude methods resulted in a relatively large increase (65% higher than baseline) in fractional Ca absorption with increased vitamin D status (36.5 nmol/L increase) [9]. However, cross-sectional data using the double isotope gold-standard method resulted in Ca absorption to be significantly low only when 25(OH)D was below 20 nmol/L in adults [10,11,12]. Intervention trials also using the double isotope method found no difference in Ca absorption with vitamin D supplementation [13] or a minimal (absolute 3%) increase despite the 200% increase in 25(OH)D [12] in women with mean baseline vitamin D status over 50 nmol/L. In addition, serum concentration of the active vitamin D metabolite, 1,25(OH)2D, is positively correlated with Ca absorption [14,15], but in many cases vitamin D supplementation does not increase circulating 1,25(OH)2D concentration [7]. Though vitamin D is essential for Ca absorption at levels below 20 nmol/L, it is possible that vitamin D can benefit bone at higher levels through other mechanisms.

3. Vitamin D and BMD

Despite the 20 nmol/L threshold for maximal vitamin D-activated Ca absorption, much data has been presented that higher vitamin D status is required to maximize BMD in adults. Vitamin D status and BMD were positively correlated in monkeys that received oophorectomy [16] and postmenopausal women. Bischoff-Ferrari and colleagues [17] report that serum 25(OH)D status was positively related to BMD. The recent Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDA) for vitamin D for those over 50 years (51–70 years: 600 IU/day, 71 years and older: 800 IU/day) were established based on vitamin D supplementation doses that decreased fracture risk [18]. The target serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) level was 50 nmol/L to meet 97.5% of the populations needs. When supplemented with Ca and vitamin D, but not Ca only, BMD was protected in adults with lower (<68 nmol/L) baseline 25(OH)D levels compared to placebo [13]. Even Finish adolescent girls with low baseline vitamin D status had a larger increase in femoral BMC with vitamin D supplementation [19], despite the negative relationship of vitamin D status and Ca absorption in adolescents reported by others [20,21,22]. Therefore, vitamin D may benefit bone independent of Ca absorption.
Increasing evidence has emerged on the local action of vitamin D. The VDR and 1α-hydroxylase (1αOHase) activity has been discovered in bone cells [23]. It has been known that 1,25(OH)2D bound to the VDR induces osteoblast, the bone-forming cell, function by activating collagen type 1α, osteocalcin and alkaline phosphatase gene transcription [24]. 1,25(OH)2D also inhibits Runx, which stimulates differentiation of mesenchymal progenitor cells to pre-osteoblasts, and pre-osteoblasts to osteoblasts. However, mature osteoblasts are activated by 1,25(OH)2D, and the receptor for activation of NFkB ligand (RANKL) binds to RANK on pre-osteoclasts. As a result, osteoclastogenesis occurs and bone resorption is increased. In mice, overexpression of VDR in mature osteoblasts increased bone formation and decreased bone resorption in tibial cortical bone and vertebral trabecular bone, respectively [25]. Also, a decrease in osteoclast and osteoid surface and width, mineralizing surface, and increase in formation period was observed as serum 25(OH)D concentration increased, regardless of circulating 1,25(OH)2D levels [26]. Much research is still needed to understand the direct effects of vitamin D on bone metabolism.
The effect of vitamin D on BMD also has a threshold and the effect may vary with Ca intake. At serum 25(OH)D levels beyond 104 nmol/L, Fleet et al. [27] reported no effect of vitamin D on BMD in young rats regardless of Ca intake (0.25% or 0.5%). At moderate intakes of Ca (0.5%) and realistic doses of vitamin D (range 25 to 1000 IU/kg diet), vitamin D increased trabecular BMD, BMC, and bone volume, but not femur BMD in growing male rats [28]. In young female rats with low Ca intakes (0.1%), vitamin D intake reduced trabecular number, thickness, and percent cancellous bone [29]. However, rats fed a normal (0.5%) Ca diet were not affected by vitamin D on any of these parameters. In older men and women, only those with Ca intakes lower than the median (716 mg/day) had a relationship between serum 25(OH)D and hip BMD, serum Ca, and serum PTH at 6 and 12 months [30]. Some studies show an increase of BMD and decreased fracture risk when supplemented with both Ca and vitamin D compared to placebo [13,31,32] but this combined treatment was not significantly different from the effect of a single nutrient effect [13,33]. Though the individual benefits of Ca and vitamin D are not always conclusive, the benefit of the combination of Ca and vitamin D supplementation on bone is evident [34].

4. Soy Isoflavones and Bone

Some plant-derived compounds that have structural similarity to estrogen, phytoestrogens, are able to bind to the estrogen receptor (ER). The results of phytoestrogen interventions on bone health outcomes vary due to the type of phytoestrogen. Therefore, in this paper we will focus on soy-derived isoflavones genistein and daidzein. The decrease of estrogen [35,36,37] or the impaired responsiveness of bone to low sex steroid concentrations [38] during aging, and especially menopause, negatively affects bone health. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) prevents bone loss and increases bone mass in postmenopausal women [39], but with additional side effects such as invasive breast cancer [40]. This peaked interest on the effectiveness of phytoestrogens on bone health promotion. Phytoestrogens bind to both α- and β-form ER but preferentially bind to the β-form ER (ERβ). The ERβ is thought to have anti-proliferative effects, thus being a possible target pathway to prevent reproductive cancer while enhancing bone health in post-menopausal women. Most genistein treatment effects disappeared from rat mandibular condyle osteoblasts when ERβ was silenced [41]. Thus, phytoestrogens may protect bone by binding to the ER, especially in estrogen-deficient post-menopausal women.
The effects of isoflavones on bone are thought to be through affecting the bone cells directly, rather than affecting Ca absorption. This is based, in part, on the lack of dose responsive effect of dietary genistein or daidzein in trans-epithelial transport of Ca in ERβ-expressing Caco-2 cell cultures [42]. Caco-2 cells responded to genistein and daidzein similarly to 17β-estrogen with no effect on calbindinD9k, an intestinal Ca transport protein [43]. Furthermore, increasing levels of soy isoflavones had no effect on Ca absorption in postmenopausal women [44,45]. On the other hand, it has been shown that isoflavones reach the bone tissue [46]. Low-dose daidzein induced nucleus ERβ, while 17β-estrogen increased ERα in young piglet bone cells [47]. Genistein also increased ERβ expression in rat mandibular subchondrial bone [41]. By binding to ERβ in osteoblastic cells in vitro, phytoestrogens induce production of osteoprotegerin (OPG). OPG competes with RANKL and prevents maturation of pre-osteoclasts and thus, resorption [48]. In piglets, daidzein increased osteoblast differentiation, secretion of OPG and RANKL, and bone mineralization more potently than the same dose of 17β-estrogen [47]. In porcine bone marrow, daidzein suppressed 1,25(OH)2D-induced TRAP-positive multi-nucleated cell formation, decreased resorption activity, and increased ER expression and apoptosis through caspase-8 and caspase-3 fragmentation in mono-nucleated cells [49]. In humans, genistein supplementation for 1 and 2 years in osteopenic post-menopausal women resulted in a greater decrease in soluble RANKL/OPG by increasing OPG and decreasing soluble RANKL [50]. These evidences imply that genistein and daidzein induce ERβ transcription and binding and reduce mature osteoclastogenesis, and hence bone resorption.
The effect of soy isoflavones on bone in rodent and human trials has mixed results. Genistein positively affected rat mandibular subchondral bone BMD, bone volume, and trabecular bone in a dose-dependent manner [41]. In OVX rodents, genistein supplementation improved femoral total and trabecular BMD [51]. Mathey et al. [52] report the benefits of genistein, daidzein, and equol, the metabolite of daidzein, on total and metaphyseal femoral BMD are similar in OVX rats. The effect of genistein and daidzein on bone has also been reported to be similar by others, but an uterotrophic effect of equol has additionally been observed [53]. Others report equol supplementation improved femur calcium, but trabecular structure was diminished and uterotropic effects were also seen at higher doses [54]. In humans, osteopenic postmenopausal women receiving 54 mg of genistein/day for 24 months were protected from bone loss at the lumbar spine and femoral neck [55]. In a shorter 6 month study, 90 mg/day of soy isoflavones protected postmenopausal women against lumbar spine bone loss [56]. Commercial soy isoflavone supplement intake (150–220 mg/day, containing daidzin, glycitin, genistin compounds) for 50 days suppressed bone resorption [43] while up to 135 mg/day of soy isoflavones (daidzin, glycitin, genistin compounds and puerarin, formononectin, or biochanin A) did not show any benefit on bone turnover assessed by urinary excretion of 41Ca from pre-labeled bone in a similar population [42]. Others report 2 years of 120 mg/day soy isoflavone supplementation in healthy postmenopausal women protected against whole body bone loss, but not specific sites, such as lumbar spine, femoral neck, or total hip [57]. Neither Taiwanese post-menopausal women [58], nor US women within 1–5 years of menopause [59] benefitted from 2 years of soy isoflavone supplementation. The inconsistent results in human studies compared to rodent research may partially be to due the diverse genetic and environmental factors that contribute to the individual capacity of producing equol from daidzein [60]. Though all rats are equol producers, not all humans produce equol and equol producing capacity may change within an individual over time, possibly 2.5 years. [61]. Thus, race, menopausal stage, equol production, dose of soy isoflavone, and bone site may be factors to consider when assessing the effect of soy phytoestrogens in humans.

5. Soy Isoflavones, Vitamin D and Bone

The possibility of soy isoflavones and vitamin D impacting Ca and bone metabolism has been investigated through cell cultures and animal models. In intestinal cancer cells, genistein up-regulates VDR transcription and VDR expression possibly through the ER and MAPK signaling pathway [62] but no reported increase in Ca absorption [43]. One proposed mechanism is that phytoestrogens increase VDR and vitamin D metabolites in bone cells. It has been reported that estrogen upregulates VDR in osteoblast-like cells [63,64]. Also, genistein and daidzein increased the expression of CYP27B1 mRNA and suppressed CYP24 mRNA expression, the enzymes that activate and deactivate 1,25(OH)2D, respectively, in colon cancer cells [65]. Intake of cowpea isoflavones and 17β-estradiol independently affected vitamin D status, BMD and BMC in osteoporotic rats fed a low Ca low vitamin D diet (0.15% Ca and 0.1 IU vitamin D/day) [66]. In early postmenopausal women, 2-year soy isoflavone supplementation reduced the loss of spinal BMD only in those with 25(OH)D below 50 nmol/L [59]. The soy isoflavones may have stimulated 1,25(OH)2D production under conditions of the low levels of substrate 25(OH)D. Though in vitro, rodent, and clinical studies suggest a relationship, more evidence must be provided to test this hypothesis and elucidate the mechanism. Another proposed mechanism is that vitamin D analogs induce ER transcription. This has been reported in the JK 1624F2-2 (JFK) analog in pre- and post-menopausal women’s bone cells [65]. The synergistic effect of 1,25(OH)2D and 17β-estradiol increased osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cell proliferation and viability [67]. Post-menopausal women receiving HRT and low amounts of vitamin D + Ca supplements (300 IU vitamin D + 93 mg Ca/day), but not those receiving HRT only, for 4 years had higher BMD compared to controls that did not receive HRT, vitamin D, nor Ca [68]. A similar effect by vitamin D and phytoestrogens may be possible, but no randomized controlled trial to investigate the synergistic effect of phytoestrogens and vitamin D has yet been reported. There may also be a threshold of the synergistic benefit of phytoestrogens and vitamin D as seen in OVX rats where genistein aglycones up to 54 mg/day human equivalent daily doses benefitted bone at standard Ca and vitamin D intakes, but not with higher Ca and vitamin D intakes [69]. Vitamin D and phytoestrogens may have a synergistic effect on bone (Figure 1) but the mechanism is still unclear and whether animal experiments can be translated into clinical effects has not been studied.
Nutrients 04 01610 g001 1024
Figure 1. Possible mechanisms of the effect of soy isoflavones and vitamin D on bone metabolism. Soy isoflavones and vitamin D (VD) can synergistically stimulate bone formation through inducing 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D synthesis and vitamin D receptor (VDR) expression. 1,25(OH)2D bound to VDR can induce osteoblast activity and bone formation. Also, bone resorption may be reduced through inducing estrogen receptor (ER) expression, which is affected by VD and soy isoflavones. An increase in ER can lead to an increase in OPG formation and thus prevents osteoclast (OC) maturation, resulting in less bone resorption.
Figure 1. Possible mechanisms of the effect of soy isoflavones and vitamin D on bone metabolism. Soy isoflavones and vitamin D (VD) can synergistically stimulate bone formation through inducing 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D synthesis and vitamin D receptor (VDR) expression. 1,25(OH)2D bound to VDR can induce osteoblast activity and bone formation. Also, bone resorption may be reduced through inducing estrogen receptor (ER) expression, which is affected by VD and soy isoflavones. An increase in ER can lead to an increase in OPG formation and thus prevents osteoclast (OC) maturation, resulting in less bone resorption.
Nutrients 04 01610 g001

6. Conclusions

This review summarizes the evidence to support the possible benefit of the combination of vitamin D and soy phytoestrogens on post-menopausal bone loss. Clinical evidence for maximal vitamin D-mediated Ca absorption does not completely explain the optimal vitamin D status for maximal BMD or BMC and lacks correlation of vitamin D-related Ca absorption and BMD or BMC in post-menopausal women. The benefit of vitamin D on bone seems to be stronger through the direct effect on osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Soy phytoestrogens in combination with vitamin D may synergistically induce osteoblast activation and prevent pre-osteoclast and osteoclast differentiation, through the increase of vitamin D metabolites, VDR, and ER actions. More research is required to identify the causal factors and the mechanism of the benefits of vitamin D and phytoestrogens on bone in post-menopausal women.

Conflict of Interest

Clara Y. Park declares no conflict of interest. Connie M. Weaver is on the following editorial boards: Osteoporosis International, Current Translational Geriatric & Experimental Gerontology, Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, Nutritiongate.com Board, Nutrition Research Reviews, Academic Press, Food Science & Technology Book Series and Advances in Food & Nutrition Research. She is also on the advisory board for the following: GEN YOUth Foundation, International Life Science Institute, Pharmavite.

References

  1. Pubmed Health: Osteoporosis—Overview. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0001400/ (accessed on 22 March 2012).
  2. What Is Osteoporosis? Available online: http://www.nof.org/articles/7 (accessed on 15 November 2012).
  3. Russo, A.; Holmquist, L.; Elixhauser, A. U.S. Hospitalizations Involving Osteoporosis and Injury, 2006; Statistical Brief #76; Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (US): Rockville, MD, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  4. Heaney, R.P.; Weaver, C.M. Calcium and vitamin D. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am. 2003, 32, 181–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Schuit, S.C.; van der Klift, M.; Weel, A.E.; de Laet, C.E.; Burger, H.; Seeman, E.; Hofman, A.; Uitterlinden, A.G.; van Leeuwen, J.P.; Pols, H.A. Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: The Rotterdam Study. Bone 2004, 34, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lips, P. Vitamin D physiology. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2006, 92, 4–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Heaney, R.P.; Barger-Lux, M.J.; Dowell, M.S.; Chen, T.C.; Holick, M.F. Calcium absorptive effects of vitamin D and its major metabolites. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1997, 2, 4111–4116. [Google Scholar]
  8. Francis, R.M.; Peacock, M. Local action of oral 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol on calcium absorption in osteoporosis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1987, 46, 315–318. [Google Scholar]
  9. Heaney, R.P.; Dowell, M.S.; Hale, C.A.; Bendich, A. Calcium absorption varies within the reference range for serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2003, 22, 142–146. [Google Scholar]
  10. Need, A.G.; Nordin, B.E. Misconceptions—vitamin D insufficiency causes malabsorption of calcium. Bone 2008, 42, 1021–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Need, A.G.; O’Loughlin, P.D.; Morris, H.A.; Coates, P.S.; Horowitz, M.; Nordin, B.E. Vitamin D metabolites and calcium absorption in severe vitamin D deficiency. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2008, 23, 1859–1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hansen, K.E.; Jones, A.N.; Lindstrom, M.J.; Davis, L.A.; Engelke, J.A.; Shafer, M.M. Vitamin D insufficiency: Disease or no disease? J. Bone Miner. Res. 2008, 23, 1052–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhu, K.; Devine, A.; Dick, I.M.; Wilson, S.G.; Prince, R.L. Effects of calcium and vitamin D supplementation on hip bone mineral density and calcium-related analytes in elderly ambulatory Australian women: A five-year randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008, 93, 743–749. [Google Scholar]
  14. Aloia, J.F.; Chen, D.G.; Yeh, J.K.; Chen, H. Serum vitamin D metabolites and intestinal calcium absorption efficiency in women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 92, 835–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Need, A.G.; Kemp, A.; Giles, N.; Morris, H.A.; Horowitz, M.; Nordin, B.E. Relationships between intestinal calcium absorption, serum vitamin D metabolites and smoking in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos. Int. 2002, 13, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Schnatz, P.F.; Marakovits, K.A.; O’Sullivan, D.M.; Ethun, K.; Clarkson, T.B.; Appt, S.E. Response to an adequate dietary intake of vitamin D3 modulates the effect of estrogen therapy on bone density. J. Womens Health (Larchmt.) 2012, 21, 858–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bischoff-Ferrari, H.A.; Kiel, D.P.; Dawson-Hughes, B.; Orav, J.E.; Li, R.; Spiegelman, D.; Dietrich, T.; Willett, W.C. Dietary calcium and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status in relation to BMD among U.S. adults. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2009, 24, 935–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2011.
  19. Viljakainen, H.T.; Natri, A.M.; Kärkkäinen, M.; Huttunen, M.M.; Palssa, A.; Jakobsen, J.; Cashman, K.D.; Mølgaard, C.; Lamberg-Allardt, C. A positive dose-response effect of vitamin D supplementation on site-specific bone mineral augmentation in adolescent girls: A double-blinded randomized placebo-controlled 1-year intervention. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2006, 21, 836–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Abrams, S.A.; Hicks, P.D.; Hawthorne, K.M. Higher serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in school-age children are inconsistently associated with increased calcium absorption. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009, 94, 2421–2427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lee, W.T.; Cheng, J.C.; Jiang, J.; Hu, P.; Hu, X.; Roberts, D.C. Calcium absorption measured by stable calcium isotopes (42Ca & 44Ca) among Northern Chinese adolescents with low vitamin D status. J. Orthop. Surg. (Hong Kong) 2002, 10, 61–66. [Google Scholar]
  22. Park, C.Y.; Hill, K.M.; Elble, A.E.; Martin, B.R.; DiMeglio, L.A.; Peacock, M.; McCabe, G.P.; Weaver, C.M. Daily supplementation with 25 μg cholecalciferol does not increase calcium absorption or skeletal retention in adolescent girls with low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D. J. Nutr. 2010, 140, 2139–2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Howard, G.A.; Turner, R.T.; Sherrard, D.J.; Baylink, D.J. Human bone cells in culture metabolize 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. J. Biol. Chem. 1981, 256, 7738–7740. [Google Scholar]
  24. Van Leeuwen, J.P.; van Driel, M.; van den Bemd, G.J.; Pols, H.A. Vitamin D control of osteoblast function and bone extracellular matrix mineralization. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 2001, 11, 199–226. [Google Scholar]
  25. Gardiner, E.M.; Baldock, P.A.; Thomas, G.P.; Sims, N.A.; Henderson, N.K.; Hollis, B.; White, C.P.; Sunn, K.L.; Morrison, N.A.; Walsh, W.R.; Eisman, J.A. Increased formation and decreased resorption of bone in mice with elevated vitamin D receptor in mature cells of the osteoblastic lineage. FASEB J. 2000, 14, 1908–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Anderson, P.H.; Sawyer, R.K.; Moore, A.J.; May, B.K.; O’Loughlin, P.D.; Morris, H.A. Vitamin D depletion induces RANKL-mediated osteoclastogenesis and bone loss in a rodent model. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2008, 23, 1789–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fleet, J.C.; Gliniak, C.; Zhang, Z.; Xue, Y.; Smith, K.B.; McCreedy, R.; Adedokun, S.A. Serum metabolite profiles and target tissue gene expression define the effect of cholecalciferol intake on calcium metabolism in rats and mice. J. Nutr. 2008, 138, 1114–1120. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hohman, E.E.; Martin, B.R.; Lachcik, P.J.; Gordon, D.T.; Fleet, J.C.; Weaver, C.M. Bioavailability and efficacy of vitamin D2 from UV-irradiated yeast in growing, vitamin D-deficient rats. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 2341–2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Iwamoto, J.; Takeda, T.; Ichimura, S.; Sato, Y.; Yeh, J.K. Differential effect of vitamin K and vitamin D supplementation on bone mass in young rats fed normal or low calcium diet. Yonsei Med. J. 2004, 45, 314–324. [Google Scholar]
  30. Peacock, M.; Liu, G.; Carey, M.; McClintock, R.; Ambrosius, W.; Hui, S.; Johnston, C.C. Effect of calcium or 25OH vitamin D3 dietary supplementation on bone loss at the hip in men and women over the age of 60. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2000, 85, 3011–3019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chapuy, M.C.; Arlot, M.E.; Duboeuf, F.; Brun, J.; Crouzet, B.; Arnaud, S.; Delmas, P.D.; Meunier, P.J. Vitamin D3 and calcium to prevent hip fractures in the elderly women. N. Engl. J. Med. 1992, 327, 1637–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dawson-Hughes, B.; Harris, S.S.; Dallal, G.E.; Krall, E.A.; Dallal, G.E. Effect of calcium and vitamin D supplementation on bone density in men and women 65 years of age or older. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997, 337, 670–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Grant, A.M.; Avenell, A.; Campbell, M.K.; McDonald, A.M.; MacLennan, G.S.; McPherson, G.C.; Anderson, F.H.; Cooper, C.; Francis, R.M.; Donaldson, C.; et al. Oral vitamin D3 and calcium for secondary prevention of low-trauma fractures in elderly people (Randomised Evaluation of Calcium Or vitamin D, RECORD): A randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2005, 365, 1621–1628. [Google Scholar]
  34. Chung, M.; Balk, E.M.; Brendel, M.; Ip, S.; Lau, J.; Lee, J.; Lichtenstein, A.; Patel, K.; Raman, G.; Tatsioni, A.; et al. Vitamin D and Calcium: A Systematic Review of Health Outcomes; Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No. 183, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Rockville, MD, USA, August 2009.
  35. Venken, K.; Callewaert, F.; Boonen, S.; Vanderschueren, D. Sex hormones, their receptors and bone health. Osteoporos. Int. 2008, 19, 1517–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Riggs, B.L.; Khosla, S.; Melton, L.J. A unitary model for involutional osteoporosis: Estrogen deficiency causes both type I and type II osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and contributes to bone loss in aging men. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1998, 13, 763–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bone Health and Osteoporosis: A Report of the Surgeon General; Office of the Surgeon General (US): Rockville, MD, USA, 2004.
  38. Riggs, B.L.; Khosla, S.; Atkinson, E.J.; Dunstan, C.R.; Melton, L.J. Evidence that type I osteoporosis results from enhanced responsiveness of bone to estrogen deficiency. Osteoporos. Int. 2003, 14, 728–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wimalawansa, S.J. A four-year randomized controlled trial of hormone replacement and bisphosphonate, alone or in combination, in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Am. J. Med. 1998, 104, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rossouw, J.E.; Anderson, G.L.; Prentice, R.L.; LaCroix, A.Z.; Kooperberg, C.; Stefanick, M.L.; Jackson, R.D.; Beresford, S.A.; Howard, B.V.; Johnson, K.C.; et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002, 288, 321–333. [Google Scholar]
  41. Li, Y.Q.; Xing, X.H.; Wang, H.; Weng, X.L.; Yu, S.B.; Dong, G.Y. Dose-dependent effects of genistein on bone homeostasis in rats’ mandibular subchondral bone. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2012, 33, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cotter, A.A.; Cashman, K.D. Lack of dose-responsive effect of dietary phyto-oestrogens on transepithelial calcium transport in human intestinal-like Caco-2 cells. Br. J. Nutr. 2004, 91, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cotter, A.A.; Jewell, C.; Cashman, K.D. The effect of oestrogen and dietary phyto-oestrogens on transepithelial calcium transport in human intestinal-like Caco-2 cells. Br. J. Nutr. 2003, 89, 755–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cheong, J.M.; Martin, B.R.; Jackson, G.S.; Elmore, D.; McCabe, G.P.; Nolan, J.R.; Barnes, S.; Peacock, M.; Weaver, C.M. Soy isoflavones do not affect bone resorption in postmenopausal women: A dose-response study using a novel approach with 41Ca. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007, 92, 577–582. [Google Scholar]
  45. Weaver, C.M.; Martin, B.R.; Jackson, G.S.; McCabe, G.P.; Nolan, J.R.; McCabe, L.D.; Barnes, S.; Reinwald, S.; Boris, M.E.; Peacock, M. Antiresorptive effects of phytoestrogen supplements compared with estradiol or risedronate in postmenopausal women using 41Ca methodology. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009, 94, 3798–3805. [Google Scholar]
  46. Mun, J.G.; Grannan, M.D.; Lachcik, P.J.; Rogers, R.B.; Yousef, G.G.; Grace, M.H.; Janle, E.M.; Wu, Q.L.; Simon, J.E.; Weaver, C.M.; Lila, M.A. Tracking deposition of a 14C-radiolabeled kudzu hairy root-derived isoflavone-rich fraction into bone. Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood) 2010, 235, 1224–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. De Wilde, A.; Lieberherr, M.; Colin, C.; Pointillart, A. A low dose of daidzein acts as an ERbeta-selective agonist in trabecular osteoblasts of young female piglets. J. Cell. Physiol. 2004, 200, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Simonet, W.S.; Lacey, D.L.; Dunstan, C.R.; Kelley, M.; Chang, M.-S.; Lothy, R.; Nguyen, H.Q.; Wooden, S.; Bennett, L.; Boone, T.; et al. Osteoprotegerin: A novel secreted protein involved in the regulation of bone density. Cell 1997, 89, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rassi, C.M.; Lieberherr, M.; Chaumaz, G.; Pointillart, A.; Cournot, G. Down-regulation of osteoclast differentiation by daidzein via caspase 3. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2002, 17, 630–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Marini, H.; Minutoli, L.; Polito, F.; Bitto, A.; Altavilla, D.; Atteritano, M.; Gaudio, A.; Mazzaferro, S.; Frisina, A.; Frisina, N.; et al. OPG and sRANKL serum concentrations in osteopenic, postmenopausal women after 2-year genistein administration. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2008, 23, 715–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Legette, L.L.; Lee, W.H.; Martin, B.R.; Story, J.A.; Arabshahi, A.; Barnes, S.; Weaver, C.M. Genistein, a phytoestrogen, improves total cholesterol, and Synergy, a prebiotic, improves calcium utilization, but there were no synergistic effects. Menopause 2011, 18, 923–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mathey, J.; Mardon, J.; Fokialakis, N.; Puel, C.; Kati-Coulibaly, S.; Mitakou, S.; Bennetau-Pelissero, C.; Lamothe, V.; Davicco, M.J.; Lebecque, P.; et al. Modulation of soy isoflavones bioavailability and subsequent effects on bone health in ovariectomized rats: The case for equol. Osteoporos. Int. 2007, 18, 671–679. [Google Scholar]
  53. Phrakonkham, P.; Chevalier, J.; Desmetz, C.; Pinnert, M.F.; Bergès, R.; Jover, E.; Davicco, M.J.; Bennetau-Pelissero, C.; Coxam, V.; Artur, Y.; Canivenc-Lavier, M.C. Isoflavonoid-based bone-sparing treatments exert a low activity on reproductive organs and on hepatic metabolism of estradiol in ovariectomized rats. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2007, 224, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Legette, L.L.; Martin, B.R.; Shahnazari, M.; Lee, W.H.; Helferich, W.G.; Qian, J.; Waters, D.J.; Arabshahi, A.; Barnes, S.; Welch, J.; et al. Supplemental dietary racemic equol has modest benefits to bone but has mild uterotropic activity in ovariectomized rats. J. Nutr. 2009, 139, 1908–1913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Marini, H.; Minutoli, L.; Polito, F.; Bitto, A.; Altavilla, D.; Atteritano, M.; Gaudio, A.; Mazzaferro, S.; Frisina, A.; Frisina, N.; et al. Effects of the phytoestrogen genistein on bone metabolism in osteopenic postmenopausal women: A randomized trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 2007, 146, 839–847. [Google Scholar]
  56. Potter, S.M.; Baum, J.A.; Teng, H.; Stillman, R.J.; Shay, N.F.; Erdman, J.W. Soy protein and isoflavones: Their effects on blood lipids and bone density in postmenopausal women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998, 68, 1375–1379. [Google Scholar]
  57. Wong, W.W.; Lewis, R.D.; Steinberg, F.M.; Murray, M.J.; Cramer, M.A.; Amato, P.; Young, R.L.; Barnes, S.; Ellis, K.J.; Shypailo, R.J.; et al. Soy isoflavone supplementation and bone mineral density in menopausal women: a 2-y multicenter clinical trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 90, 1433–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tai, T.Y.; Tsai, K.S.; Tu, S.T.; Wu, J.S.; Chang, C.I.; Chen, C.L.; Shaw, N.S.; Peng, H.Y.; Wang, S.Y.; Wu, C.H. The effect of soy isoflavone on bone mineral density in postmenopausal Taiwanese women with bone loss: A 2-year randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Osteoporos. Int. 2012, 23, 1571–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Levis, S.; Strickman-Stein, N.; Ganjei-Azar, P.; Xu, P.; Doerge, D.R.; Krischer, J. Soy isoflavones in the prevention of menopausal bone loss and menopausal symptoms: A randomized, double-blind trial. Arch. Intern. Med. 2011, 171, 1363–1369. [Google Scholar]
  60. Setchell, K.D.; Brown, N.M.; Lydeking-Olsen, E. The clinical importance of the metabolite equol-a clue to the effectiveness of soy and its isoflavones. J. Nutr. 2002, 132, 3577–3584. [Google Scholar]
  61. Franke, A.A.; Lai, J.F.; Halm, B.M.; Pagano, I.; Kono, N.; Mack, W.J.; Hodis, H.N. Equol production changes over time in postmenopausal women. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2012, 23, 573–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gilad, L.A.; Tirosh, O.; Schwartz, B. Phytoestrogens regulate transcription and translation of vitamin D receptor in colon cancer cells. J. Endocrinol. 2006, 191, 387–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Liel, Y.; Kraus, S.; Levy, J.; Shany, S. Evidence that estrogens modulate activity and increase the number of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D receptors in osteoblast-like cells (ROS 17/2.8). Endocrinology 1992, 130, 2597–2601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ishibe, M.; Nojima, T.; Ishibashi, T.; Koda, T.; Kaneda, K.; Rosier, R.N.; Puzas, J.E. 17 beta-estradiol increases the receptor number and modulates the action of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in human osteosarcoma-derived osteoblast-like cells. Calcif. Tissue Int. 1995, 57, 430–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Somjen, D.; Katzburg, S.; Kohen, F.; Gayer, B.; Sharon, O.; Hendel, D.; Posner, G.H.; Kaye, A.M. Responsiveness to phytoestrogens in primary human osteoblasts is modulated differentially by a “less-calcemic” analog of 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D3: JK 1624F2-2 (JKF). J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2006, 98, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chennaiah, S.; Vijayalakshmi, V.; Suresh, C. Effect of the supplementation of dietary rich phytoestrogens in altering the vitamin D levels in diet induced osteoporotic rat model. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2010, 121, 268–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Song, L.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, Y. A synergetic role of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in 17β-estradial induced-proliferation and differentiation of osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2011, 659, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Tuppurainen, M.T.; Komulainen, M.; Kröger, H.; Honkanen, R.; Jurvelin, J.; Puntila, E.; Heikkinen, A.M.; Alhava, E.; Saarikoski, S. Does vitamin D strengthen the increase in femoral neck BMD in osteoporotic women treated with estrogen? Osteoporos. Int. 1998, 8, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bitto, A.; Marini, H.; Burnett, B.P.; Polito, F.; Levy, R.M.; Irrera, N.; Minutoli, L.; Adamo, E.B.; Squadrito, F.; Altavilla, D. Genistein aglycone effect on bone loss is not enhanced by supplemental calcium and vitamin D3: A dose ranging experimental study. Phytomedicine 2011, 18, 879–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Park, C.Y.; Weaver, C.M. Vitamin D Interactions with Soy Isoflavones on Bone after Menopause: A Review. Nutrients 2012, 4, 1610-1621. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu4111610

AMA Style

Park CY, Weaver CM. Vitamin D Interactions with Soy Isoflavones on Bone after Menopause: A Review. Nutrients. 2012; 4(11):1610-1621. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu4111610

Chicago/Turabian Style

Park, Clara Y., and Connie M. Weaver. 2012. "Vitamin D Interactions with Soy Isoflavones on Bone after Menopause: A Review" Nutrients 4, no. 11: 1610-1621. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu4111610

APA Style

Park, C. Y., & Weaver, C. M. (2012). Vitamin D Interactions with Soy Isoflavones on Bone after Menopause: A Review. Nutrients, 4(11), 1610-1621. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu4111610

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop