Next Article in Journal
Biomarker Evaluation and Toxic Effects of an Acute Oral and Systemic Fumonisin Exposure of Pigs with a Special Focus on Dietary Fumonisin Esterase Supplementation
Next Article in Special Issue
Botulinum Toxin for the Treatment of Hand Tremor
Previous Article in Journal
Multi-Mycotoxin Occurrence in Dairy Cattle Feeds from the Gauteng Province of South Africa: A Pilot Study Using UHPLC-QTOF-MS/MS
Previous Article in Special Issue
Novel Applications of OnabotulinumtoxinA in Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 10
Issue 7
10.3390/toxins10070295
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Unilateral Botulinum Neurotoxin-A Injection into the Striatum of C57BL/6 Mice Leads to a Different Motor Behavior Compared with Rats

by
Veronica Antipova
1,2,
Andreas Wree
1,*,
Carsten Holzmann
3,
Teresa Mann
1,
Nicola Palomero-Gallagher
4,5,
Karl Zilles
4,5,6,
Oliver Schmitt
1 and
Alexander Hawlitschka
1
1
Institute of Anatomy, Rostock University Medical Center, Gertrudenstrasse 9, D-18057 Rostock, Germany
2
Gottfried Schatz Research Center for Cell Signaling, Metabolism and Aging, Macroscopic and Clinical Anatomy, Medical University of Graz, Harrachgasse 21/1, A-8010 Graz, Austria
3
Institute of Medical Genetics, Rostock University Medical Center, Ernst-Heydemann-Strasse 8, D-18057 Rostock, Germany
4
Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine INM-1, Research Center Jülich, D-52425 Jülich, Germany
5
Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen, D-52062 Aachen, Germany
6
JARA—Translational Brain Medicine, D-52062 Aachen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2018, 10(7), 295; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10070295
Submission received: 5 July 2018 / Revised: 13 July 2018 / Accepted: 15 July 2018 / Published: 17 July 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Botulinum Neurotoxins and Nervous System: Future Challenges for Novel Indications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Different morphological changes in the caudate-putamen (CPu) of naïve rats and mice were observed after intrastriatal botulinum neurotoxin-A (BoNT-A) injection. For this purpose we here studied various motor behaviors in mice (n = 46) longitudinally up to 9 months after intrastriatal BoNT-A administration as previously reported for rats, and compared both outcomes. Apomorphine- and amphetamine-induced rotational behavior, spontaneous motor behavior, as well as lateralized neglect were studied in mice after the injection of single doses of BoNT-A into the right CPu, comparing them with sham-injected animals. Unilateral intrastriatal injection of BoNT-A in mice induced significantly increased contralateral apomorphine-induced rotations for 1 to 3 months, as well as significantly increased contralateral amphetamine-induced rotations 1 to 9 months after injection. In rats (n = 28), unilateral BoNT-A injection also induced significantly increased contralateral apomorphine-induced rotations 3 months after injection, but did not provoke amphetamine-induced rotations at all. Lateralized sensorimotor integration, forelimb preference, and forelimb stepping were significantly impaired on the left side. The differences in motor behaviors between rats and mice may be caused by different BoNT-A effects on cholinergic and catecholaminergic fibers in rat and mouse striata, interspecies differences in striatal receptor densities, and different connectomes of the basal ganglia.
Keywords:
botulinum neurotoxin-A; basal ganglia; interspecies differences in motor behavior; mouse; rat; interneurons
Key Contribution: We investigated the effect of intrastriatal BoNT-A application on motor behavior in naïve mice for the first time. To interpret the differences of the BoNT-A effect in mice and rats, multi-receptor fingerprints of Wistar rats and C57Bl/6 mice as well as their basal ganglia connectomes were compared.

1. Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a common chronic progressive age-related neurodegenerative movement disorder characterized by the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta and, subsequently, of dopamine in the caudate-putamen (CPu) [1,2,3]. Dopamine deficit causes a profound impairment of neuronal circuits in the basal ganglia [4,5,6,7], and particularly an increased release of acetylcholine by tonically active striatal interneurons [8,9,10,11,12]. Anticholinergic drugs are used to antagonize striatal hypercholinism in PD, but this treatment often elicits adverse side effects [13,14,15]. In order to circumvent general anticholinergic drug effects, we tested a local intrastriatal injection of botulinum neurotoxin-A (BoNT-A) [16,17,18,19,20].
Indeed, in the experimental 6-OHDA-induced hemiparkinsonian (hemi-PD) rat model, intrastriatal application of BoNT-A abolished apomorphine-induced rotational behavior—most probably by blocking acetylcholine, the release of cholinergic terminals, and/or inducing changes in receptor densities [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Moreover, the unilateral intrastriatal BoNT-A injection induced rotational behavior in naïve rats without 6-OHDA-induced hemi-PD. Following the injection of 1 ng BoNT-A into the right CPu, rats showed 2–4 apomorphine-induced rotations per min in the direction of the injection site for two months, and rotated tentatively to the contralateral side thereafter [19].
To date, behavioral effects of intrastriatal BoNT-A injections were studied in rats, but not in mice. This would be interesting, as comparative morphological studies of the striata of BoNT-A-injected rats and mice striata showed obvious differences in the structural changes of choline acetyltransferase-immunoreactive (ChAT-ir) and tyrosine hydroxylase-immunoreactive (TH-ir) fibers [19,20,24], in addition to similarities concerning unchanged CPu volume and the number of cholinergic interneurons. Rats and mice differed in the induction of BoNT-A-induced varicosities: both kinds of these varicosities were found in rats [16,17,19,20,21], whereas only ChAT-ir BoNT-A-induced varicosities were observed in mice [24].
As naïve mice and rats reacted morphologically in a different manner following intrastriatal BoNT-A injection, we sought to determine whether these species differences would also hold true for motor behavior. Thus, mouse motor behavior was scored after unilateral BoNT-A injection into the right CPu using apomorphine- and amphetamine-induced rotations. Spontaneous behavior was tested using the cylinder and stepping tests, lateralized sensorimotor activity by the corridor task, and cerebellar ataxia by hindlimb clasping. To evaluate temporally restricted effects, mice were tested up to 9 months after BoNT-A injection. A potential dose-dependency was evaluated by using dosages of 25 and 50 pg BoNT-A.
It is known that mice are very sensitive to botulinum toxins and also differ in many respects from rats [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. However, there are currently no studies evaluating the behavioral outcome of intrastriatally applied BoNT-A in naïve mice. Moreover, the effect of BoNT-A in naïve mice must be understood prior to evaluation of intrastriatal BoNT-A application in mice models of hemi-PD and genetic PD. The BoNT-A dosage used for intrastriatal injection for the treatment of experimental hemi-PD in rats was based on the LD50 and recent intracerebral BoNT-A injections [34,35,36,37,38]. In Wistar rats we found a well-tolerated and effective dosage at 1 ng BoNT-A per CPu, whereas 5 ng were mortal [19]. In the C57BL/6 mice, dosages of 25–50 pg BoNT-A per striatum were found to be appropriate [24].
Studying the behavioral effect of unilateral intrastriatal BoNT-A application in naïve mice also seemed to be important, since the effect of therapeutic BoNT-A applications is explored in increasingly studied genetic Parkinsonian mouse models [39,40,41,42,43,44,45].

2. Results

2.1. Body Weight

Changes in body weight were evaluated as an index of general adverse effects of BoNT-A application. The mice weighed 18–24 g at the time of BoNT-A or vehicle injection. Thereafter, body weight increased in all experimental groups (Figure 1). Increase in body weight over time was significantly (F2, 50 = 15.5999, p < 0.001) lower in mice injected with BoNT-A than in those receiving vehicle substance. However, 9 months after BoNT-A injection, the 25 pg BoNT-A mice weighed 31.85 ± 0.37 g (mean ± SEM), the 50 pg BoNT-A mice 33.72 ± 0.40 g, and thus did not differ from the sham group, which weighed 34.66 ± 0.35 g (Figure 1).

2.2. Apomorphine-Induced Rotations

2.2.1. Mice

In order to test the effect of a unilateral intrastriatal BoNT-A injection on drug-induced motor behavior we used apomorphine- and amphetamine-induced rotation tests. Half a month after injection of 25 or 50 pg BoNT-A or vehicle into the right CPu mice showed no apomorphine-induced rotation behavior (Figure 2A). Vehicle application did not induce rotational behavior in the subsequent 9 months. However, both applications of 25 and 50 pg BoNT-A resulted in significant (F2, 50 = 6.150, p = 0.004) anti-clockwise, i.e., contralateral, apomorphine-induced rotations with net rotations of about 2 per minute after a post-injection survival of 1 and 3 months (Figure 2A). Six and 9 months after BoNT-A, rotational behavior decreased to values similar to those observed in the vehicle-treated group.

2.2.2. Rats

Following apomorphine injection rats significantly rotated contralaterally to the intrastriatal BoNT-A application with rotations of approximately 1.5 to 2 per minute 3 months after 1 ng BoNT-A (Figure 3A).

2.3. Amphetamine-Induced Rotations

2.3.1. Mice

After intrastriatal injection of 25 or 50 pg BoNT-A, the mice showed significantly increased (F2, 48 = 15.360, p < 0.001) amphetamine-induced rotations compared to the vehicle group from 1 to 9 months post injection (Figure 2B). Whereas application of BoNT-A was associated with strong amphetamine-induced anti-clockwise net rotations of approximately 4–10 per min, vehicle injection resulted in clockwise rotations of approximately 3 per min (Figure 2B).

2.3.2. Rats

In rats, amphetamine application revealed no significant effect of unilateral intrastriatal BoNT-A as compared with vehicle injection (Figure 3B).

2.4. Cylinder Test

The cylinder test evaluates asymmetries in spontaneous forelimb use during exploratory activity in a novel environment. Sham injection did not induce any laterality of forepaw usage during the whole testing period up to 9 months; left and right forepaws were used equally often in the sham group (Figure 4A). In contrast, BoNT-A-injected mice, irrespective of the dosage and survival time, exhibited a significantly reduced (F2, 52 = 31.971, p < 0.001) use of the left forepaw of about 40% (Figure 4A).

2.5. Corridor Task

Lateralized sensorimotor integration was assessed using the corridor test, which depends on the rodent’s ability to retrieve food from either side of its body. Animals of the vehicle group made an equivalent number of retrievals (about 50% of total retrievals from both the left and right sides of the corridor) over the whole testing period (Figure 4B). However, mice of both BoNT-A groups showed a significant neglect (F2, 40 = 11.506, p < 0.001) of the corridor side contralateral to the BoNT-A injection side. These mice retrieved only about 35% of the sugar pellets from the left corridor side during the whole observation period (Figure 4B).

2.6. Stepping Test

The motor activity of the forelimbs was estimated using a mouse-friendly version of the stepping test. Adjusting forepaw steps were measured on the injected (right) and noninjected (left) sides. Mice of the sham group made approximately 10–11 steps with either forepaw during the whole testing time (Figure 4C,D). Mice of both BoNT-A groups exhibited significantly fewer adjusting steps (F2, 42 = 99.773, p < 0.001) with their left forepaws up to 9 months after BoNT-A (Figure 4C). A reduction in adjusting steps with the right forepaw was seen in BoNT-A-injected mice of both dosages 1 month after BoNT-A (Figure 4D).

2.7. Hindlimb Clasping

We evaluated neurological abnormalities using the hindlimb clasping test. Mice of the two BoNT-A groups and the sham group did not show any pathological hindlimb clasping during the whole testing period from 1 to 9 months; the hindlimbs of all mice were consistently splayed outward and away from the abdomen resulting in an assigned score of 0.

3. Discussion

Previous studies of unilateral injections of BoNT-A into the CPu of male C57BL/6 mice showed that the number of ChAT-ir interneurons was unaltered in the CPu, and ChAT-ir BoNT-A-induced varicosities were visible. Both results are comparable with findings in the rat [16,17,18,19,20]. However, in contrast to rats, there were no TH-ir BoNT-A-induced varicosities in BoNT-A-injected mouse. As BoNT-A application seemed to have a different influence on cholinergic and dopaminergic axons in the mouse striatum [24], the CPu-associated motor behavior was studied. Moreover, a possible temporally occurring BoNT-A effect as seen in previous studies in rats [16,17,18,19,20,21] was evaluated by testing mice up to 9 months after BoNT-A injection. Dose dependency was studied by using dosages of 25 and 50 pg BoNT-A. As a significant dose dependency within the evaluated parameters was not obvious, the results of mice receiving dosages of 25 and 50 pg BoNT-A will be discussed together.
We found that unilateral intrastriatal BoNT-A injection in naïve mice led to significant contralateral amphetamine- and apomorphine-induced rotations as well as to significant impairments of the left (i.e., contralateral) side with respect to lateralized sensorimotor integration, forelimb usage, and forelimb stepping.

3.1. Basal Ganglia Circuitry after BoNT-A Injection

Locally injected BoNT-A is thought to act in two main ways in the striatum, where it blocks the acetylcholine release of the tonically active cholinergic interneurons [46,47,48], counteracts the D2 receptor upregulation found in hemi-PD rats, and reduces D2 receptor concentrations in naïve rats [22,23]. The assumed BoNT-A-induced reduction of acetylcholine concentration in the injected CPu reduces the firing activity of medium spiny neurons projecting to (i) the external globus pallidus, i.e., those which are part of the indirect basal ganglia loop, and (ii) to the internal globus pallidus, i.e., those which are part of the direct basal ganglia loop [49,50,51,52,53].
The effects of BoNT-A on the reduction of cholinergic transmission and of D2 receptor concentrations seemingly underlie movement initiation deficits, akinesia and reduced spontaneous use of the contralateral forelimbs [54,55,56,57].

3.2. Body Weight

Body weight increased in all three experimental groups from two weeks up to 9 months after intrastriatal BoNT-A or vehicle injection. However, mice injected with either of the BoNT-A dosages weighed less compared to the sham group two weeks after injection onwards, although the differences diminished after 9 months. These differences might point at a mild temporal toxicity of BoNT-A after the stereotactic injection.

3.3. Spontaneous Motor Tests

3.3.1. Spontaneous Forelimb Use

The cylinder test evaluates locomotor asymmetry and forelimb use in rodent models of central nervous system disorders by assessing the innate drive to explore a novel environment by rearing and leaning their forepaw against the wall of the glass cylinder [58]. Unilaterally sham-injected mice used the left and right paws symmetrically, i.e., about 50% each. Right side intrastriatal application of BoNT-A significantly reduced the use of the left paw.
Seemingly, the impairment of motor initiation deficit for voluntary movements of the contralateral forelimb is a specific result of BoNT-A injection into the CPu since it decreases firing of GABAergic medium spiny neurons to the internal globus pallidus in the direct loop, and therefore inhibits the ventrolateral thalamic nucleus. On the other hand D2 receptor-bearing medium spiny neurons increase inhibition of the external globus pallidus in the indirect loop, and resulted in a more actively firing internal globus pallidus via reduced inhibition of the spontaneously active subthalamic nucleus. Therefore, the inhibited neurons of the ventrolateral thalamic nucleus are not able to sufficiently activate the premotor cortex via both loops.

3.3.2. Sensorimotor Integration

The corridor task, originally designed to study unilateral sensorimotor integration impairments in rats [59,60], was adapted for experiments in mice [61]. Mice injected with 25 or 50 pg BoNT-A into the right striatum retrieved pellets significantly less often from the left side during the testing period up to 9 months after BoNT-A, whereas sham-injected mice behaved symmetrically. As is the case for the forepaw preference studied in the cylinder test, the motor initiation deficit for voluntary movements of the contralateral forelimb is probably a specific result of the BoNT-A injection into the CPu. Both the reduction of striatal cholinergic transmission and the reduction of D2 receptor density causes changes in the basal ganglia circuitry resulting in a reduced initiation of movements of the contralateral body via crossed motor efferents [57,62,63].

3.3.3. Forelimb Adjusting Steps

In our study, we used the mouse-friendly version of the stepping test described by Blume et al. [64] and modified by Heuer et al. [65]. Right sided intrastriatal application of 25 and 50 pg BoNT-A clearly reduced the stepping frequency of the left forepaw up to 9 months after injection compared to sham group. A reduced initiation of movements of the paw contralateral to the BoNT-A application via crossed motor efferents is reasonable for the outcome of this behavioral test [66,67,68]. Interestingly, the intrastriatal BoNT-A injection into the right CPu also results in a short-term reduction of right paw adjusting steps. One month after vehicle injection mice made 10.8 ± 0.2 steps; at the same time the 25 pg BoNT-A group made 9.2 ± 0.2, and the 50 pg BoNT-A group 8.9 ± 0.2 steps. This phenomenon is not fully understood, as the right forepaw steps should be unaltered. The mouse-friendly design of the stepping test has also been applied in the mouse MTPT model [64] resulting in bilateral impairment, and also following different right side models of dopaminergic lesioning to induce unilateral parkinsonian-like symptoms [65,69,70]. Unilateral dopaminergic depletion, however, led to contradicting results in the same test. Heuer et al. [65] stated that the number of steps is reduced in both paws to about 80% compared to sham-injected mice irrespective of the experimental approach inducing unilateral or bilateral striatal dopamine reduction. In contrast, Glajch et al. [69] reported a ratio of contralateral-to-ipsilateral steps of about 0.2 after unilateral 6-OHDA lesion of the medial forebrain bundle. Boix et al. [70] reported a ratio of approximately 6 to 27%, depending on the 6-OHDA dosage used. Thus, both groups show a clear unilateral effect. However, neither Glajch et al. [69] nor Boix et al. [70] mention the absolute number of steps made by the ipsilateral paw, which would be important for comparison with our results.

3.3.4. Hindlimb Clasping

Hindlimb clasping has been shown to occur in various neurodegenerative mouse models [71,72] including PD models [73,74]. All our mice, irrespective of BoNT-A or vehicle injection, never showed pathological hindlimb clasping during the whole testing period from 1 to 9 months. We interpret the absence of this pathological behavior in our model as indirect evidence that the BoNT-A dosages used are not generally toxic in the striatum.

3.4. Drug-Induced Rotation Tests

3.4.1. Apomorphine-Induced Rotations

There is an apomorphine-induced rotational behavior of BoNT-A-treated mice and rats. Mice with 25 and 50 pg BoNT-A injected intrastriatally showed significant contralateral apomorphine-induced rotations after a survival of 1 and 3 months with rotations of about 2 per minute. Thereafter, rotational behavior decreased to values not significantly different from those of the vehicle group. These measurements corroborate data obtained in rats (Figure 3A), which also showed a significantly altered behavior with rotations of approximately 1.5 to 2 per minute 3 months after intrastriatal injection of 1 ng BoNT-A.
Apomorphine-induced rotations are mainly due to binding of the drug to D2 receptors that are distributed unequally in both striata. Following apomorphine application, hemi-PD rats and hemi-PD mice rotate to the body side contralateral to the dopamine-depleted hemisphere, which has a higher D2 receptor concentration than the contralateral one [65,70,75]. Acetylcholine is reduced in BoNT-A-injected striata, and thus, the activation of all medium spiny neurons is reduced. Moreover, striatal receptor concentration measurements investigated in BoNT-A-treated hemi-PD rats speak in favor of a BoNT-A-induced reduction of D2 receptors in the respective CPu [22,23].
Considering that the majority of striatal D2 receptors are located on the D2 receptor bearing medium spiny neuron, an unaltered dopamine concentration in the CPu would result in a movement deficit of the contralateral body side via the indirect basal ganglia loop in BoNT-A-treated striata. However, if the majority of striatal D2 receptors are located on the presynaptic terminals of the dopamine afferents from the substantia nigra pars compacta, then dopamine release should be increased due to reduced inhibition by D2 autoreceptors on dopamine terminals [76]. The hypothetically increased striatal dopamine concentration in the BoNT-A-injected CPu would result in an increased movement of the contralateral body side via the indirect basal ganglia loop as suggested by Da Cunha et al. [77]. As all tests for spontaneous motor behavior after striatal BoNT-A revealed an initiation deficit in the contralateral forelimb, the functional significance of D2 autoreceptors for these non-drug-induced behaviors seemed limited.
Since apomorphine is mainly a D2 receptor agonist, its application possibly reverses the alterations in basal ganglia circuitry induced by BoNT-A by shifting the dopamine-mediated functional significance from D2 receptor-bearing medium spiny neuron to D2 autoreceptor-bearing dopamine terminals, thus resulting in a stronger movement initiation in the contralateral body musculature. If dopamine release by the disinhibited dopamine terminals exceeds the apomorphine-induced disinhibition of the D2 receptor-bearing medium spiny neuron, then we can assume the occurrence of a mildly increased contralateral forelimb activity via deactivation of the medium spiny neuron of the indirect basal ganglia loop, which would result in the contralateral rotation behavior [66,67].

3.4.2. Amphetamine-Induced Rotations

Mice with intrastriatal injection of 25 or 50 pg BoNT-A show clear anti-clockwise rotations of about 4–10 per min following the application of amphetamine (Figure 2B). In contrast, comparable experiments in rats revealed no significant effect of BoNT-A injections as compared with vehicle injection (Figure 3B). The obvious difference in BoNT-A-inducible amphetamine rotations between mice and rats is not fully understood.
Amphetamine mainly increases the extracellular dopamine concentration by different mechanisms: it competitively inhibits dopamine uptake via dopamine transporter, facilitates the movement of dopamine from the vesicle into the cytoplasm, and promotes DAT-mediated reverse transport of dopamine into the synaptic cleft independent of action potential-induced vesicular release [78]. Additionally, microdialysis studies in rats revealed amphetamine-induced increased extracellular concentrations of glutamate, aspartate, GABA, taurine, glycine, serotonin, acetylcholine, and of different peptides [79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86].
There is a notable species difference regarding amphetamine-induced contralateral rotation behavior in unilaterally BoNT-A-injected animals, since it is present in mice, but not in rats. Three aspects will be discussed: (1) different effects on axon terminals after intrastriatal BoNT-A injections in mice and rats, (2) the concentrations of the most frequent transmitter receptors in the CPu of naïve mice and rats, and (3) the connectome of the basal ganglia of mice and rats.
Hawlitschka et al. [24] showed that striata from mice and rats react differently after BoNT-A injection with respect to the appearance of TH-ir BoNT-A -induced varicosities [24], since they are consistently found in rats, but were never seen in mice [19,24]. BoNT-A-induced varicosities can be interpreted as a sign of structural alterations induced by BoNT-A. The difference in the occurrence of BoNT-A-induced varicosities between mice and rats might be based on the synaptic vesicle glycoprotein C (SV2C) receptor responsible for the internalization of BoNT-A into the neuron [87,88]. Unfortunately, no data exist concerning differences of SV2C affinity or susceptibility between the CPu of rats and mice [87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95]. It cannot be ruled out that the dopaminergic fibers are differently influenced by BoNT-A and thus the balance or interaction of various transmitter systems on the functional outcome underlying the amphetamine-induced rotation behavior of intrastriatally applied BoNT-A may differ [79,96,97,98,99,100,101]. In contrast to the interspecies differences in BoNT-A-induced varicosities, ChAT-ir BoNT-A-induced varicosities were consistently found in CPu of both rats and mice following intrastriatal BoNT-A.

3.4.3. Receptors and Connectomics of the CPu

To analyze possible interspecies differences of transmitter systems in the CPu of control rats and mice, we compared the multireceptor fingerprints (Figure S1) of Wistar rats (n = 6, data from [23,102,103]) and of C57Bl/6 mice (n = 6; data from [40]). Additionally, the connectome of the mouse basal ganglia generated in a high throughput tract tracing study published as Alan Atlas connectome [104] is compared with rat data (Figure S2). Details to multireceptor fingerprints and connectomes are provided in the Supplement.

4. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

BoNT-A unilaterally injected into the CPu in naïve mice differentially affected various motor behaviors. Lateralized sensorimotor integration, forelimb preference, and forelimb stepping were significantly impaired contralateral to the injected side. Unilateral intrastriatal BoNT-A induced significant contralateral amphetamine-induced rotations from 1 to 9 months post injection, which is completely opposite to the reaction found in rats. The differences in motor behavior induced by unilateral intrastriatal BoNT-A injections between rats and mice is possibly caused by different effects of BoNT-A on TH-ir fibers in rat and mouse striata, interspecies differences in striatal receptor densities, and different connectomes of the basal ganglia between mice and rats.
Local injection of BoNT-A into the striatum of hemi-PD rats is thought to decrease the local release of acetylcholine therein. Hypercholinism of the striatum caused by acetylcholine released from disinhibited tonically active cholinergic interneurons is held responsible for a disturbed basal ganglia circuitry and, consequently, for motor and behavioral dysfunctions [9,46,48,105]. One possible approach to treat PD is the reduction of the hypercholinism using oral anticholinergic drugs [106,107]. Due to the systemic drug application, adverse side effects such as anticholinergic syndrome and dyskinesia are common [13,14,15,108]. In the experimental hemi-PD rats, BoNT-A injected locally into the CPu is beneficial for 3 to 6 months with respect to apomorphine-induced rotational behavior [16,17,18,19,20,21]. Future experiments will cover two topics: First, repeated intrastriatal BoNT-A injections in hemi-PD rats every 6 months should test whether motor behavior could be improved for a longer time period, which would be a prerequisite for the clinical application of BoNT-A [109,110,111,112]. Second, extending our studies of intrastriatal BoNT-A injections to naïve mice, BoNT-A will be injected into mice of various parkinsonian models including those with alterations of relevant PD-associated genes to obtain further insights into PD-related etiology [39,40,113,114,115].
In conclusion, locally applied BoNT-A, or other botulinum neurotoxins, could be useful in treating brain dysfunctions requiring a deactivation of local brain activity [116]. Advantageously, the effect of local BoNT-A is time-limited and reversible. It can be speculated that following prospective experiments in primates botulinum neurotoxins might be applied as an effective and individually-tailored “chemical neurosurgical approach” [116,117].

5. Materials and Methods

5.1. Animals

A total of 46 young adult male C57BL/6 mice (Charles River Wiga, Sulzfeld, Germany) weighing 18–24 g and 28 Wistar rats (strain Crl: WI BR, Charles River Wiga, Sulzfeld, Germany) with a body weight of 280–320 g were used in this study. Animals were housed in standard cages in a temperature-controlled room (22 ± 2 °C) under 12 h light/12 h dark conditions with free access to food and water. All procedures were approved by the State Animal Research Committee of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania (LALLF M-V/TSD/7221.3-1.1-053/08, LALLF M-V/TSD/7221.3-1.1-003/13 from 26 April 2013 and 13 April 2016).

5.2. BoNT-A application

In the mice, surgery was conducted under aseptic conditions and animals were deeply anesthetized with ketamine (75 mg/kg, bela-pharm Vechta, Germany)/xylazine (5.8 mg/kg, Rompun®, Bayer, Germany), mounted in a mouse adapter (Stoelting, Wood Dale, IL, USA), and fixed in a rat stereotactic apparatus (Kopf, Tujunga, CA, USA). The skull was opened with a dental drill and the mice received an injection of 1 µL BoNT-A solution (Lot No. 13028A1A; List, Campbell, CA, USA, purchased via Quadratech Diagnostics, Surrey, UK) containing a total of 25 pg or 50 pg BoNT-A dissolved in PBS + 0.1% BSA into the right CPu delivered over 4 min using a 26-gauge 5 µL Hamilton syringe, at a rate of 0.25 µL per minute (Figure 5). The sham group received 1 µL BoNT-A vehicle solution. The injection coordinates with reference to bregma were: anterior-posterior = +0.65 mm, lateral = −1.6 mm, and vertical = −3.0 mm from dura, respectively [118] (Figure 5).
Rats were injected either with 1 ng BoNT-A (n = 22) or the vehicle solution (sham, n = 6) into the right striatum under ketamine (50 mg/kg)/xylazine (4 mg/kg) anesthesia. The BoNT-A solution was injected at two sites, each injection consisting of 0.5 ng BoNT-A solved in 1 µL PBS + 0.1% BSA. Sham-injected rats received the vehicle solution. The coordinates according to bregma were: anterior-posterior = +1.3 mm/−0.4 mm, lateral = −2.6 mm/−3.6 mm and ventral = −5.5 mm/−5.5 mm, respectively [119].
We founded our experiments on the weight values of BoNT-A, i.e., 25 to 50 pg per mouse CPu and 1 ng per rat CPu. In mice the LD50 value after intraperitoneal injection is about 0.25–1.15 ng/kg BoNT-A [120]. Thus, in our experiments a dosage of 50 pg BoNT-A per mouse, injected intrastriatally, is below the classical LD50, and well tolerated. In clinical use the normal amount of BoNT-A (Xeomin, Dysport, Botox and others) is about 200 to 300 units at maximum per patient per session depending on the clinical symptoms and site of application. Remarkably, the clinical efficacy of a “unit” is reported differently by the various manufactures (Botox: 5 ng correspond to 100 units; Dysport: 4.35 ng correspond to 500 units; Xeomin: 0.6 ng correspond to 100 units) [121]. These uncertainties relay on the nonstandardized LD50 bioassays required to achieve the median lethal dose = LD50 (depending on mouse strain, sex, age, volume and route of injection) [122].

5.3. Body Weight

Body weights were measured before stereotactic surgery and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9 months after injection of BoNT-A or vehicle.

5.4. Behavioral Testing

Three experimental mouse groups were behaviorally tested: (1) animals receiving 25 pg BoNT-A (25 pg BoNT-A group, n = 15), (2) animals receiving 50 pg BoNT-A (50 pg BoNT-A group, n = 20), and (3) animals receiving vehicle (sham group, n = 11). During the experimental period 5 mice died. Smaller groups were evaluated for the stepping test and the corridor task (25 pg, n = 11; 50 pg, n = 12; sham, n = 10). All mice were adapted to the examination room for 1 h before testing. All tests were performed at 4 time points (1, 3, 6, and 9 months) after the injection of BoNT-A or vehicle, and drug-induced rotations were additionally scored 0.5 months after BoNT-A or vehicle, always according to an identical time schedule (Figure 6). In rats drug-induced rotation tests were carried out 1, 2, 3, and 9 months after BoNT (n = 22) or vehicle (n = 6) injection.

5.4.1. Drug-Induced Rotation Tests (Apomorphine, Amphetamine)

Mice rotations were assessed using an automated rotometer system (Rotometer UGO BASILE 43000; Ugo Basile Sri, Gemonio, Varese, Italy). Apomorphine was injected subcutaneously at a dosage of 0.5 mg/kg [123,124,125] (Teclapharm, Lüneburg, Germany) dissolved in 0.9% sterile saline. Three days later, D-amphetamine sulphate (Sigma Aldrich, München, Germany) was injected intraperitoneally at a dosage of 2.5 mg/kg [124,126,127] (Figure 6). Recording of apomorphine- and amphetamine-induced rotations began 5 min after drug injection and lasted 40 min. Rotations were defined as complete 360° turns and registered as net difference between the two directions per minute [128]. Anti-clockwise rotations were expressed by positive values, rotations in clockwise direction by negative values. Respective rotations in rats were induced by either 0.25 mg/kg apomorphine applied subcutaneously (Teclapharm, Germany) or 2.5 mg d-amphetamine sulfate (intraperitoneal; Sigma Aldrich, München, Germany), both solved in saline. Rotations were measured over 40 min after apomorphine and over 60 min after amphetamine in a self-constructed rotometer according to Ungerstedt and Arbuthnott [128].

5.4.2. Spontaneous Motor Tests

Mice were tested in the cylinder test, stepping test, hindlimb clasping, and corridor task at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months after injection of BoNT-A or vehicle following a constant time table (Figure 6).

Cylinder Test

Forelimb preference was evaluated with the cylinder test as previously described [58,129]. Mice were placed in a glass cylinder (diameter 19 cm, height 20 cm) with mirrors placed behind to allow for a 360° view of every contact with the side of the cylinder. Sessions were taped with a video camera system (JVC, GZ-MG255E, Yokohama, Japan), and scored later. For each animal thirty consecutive forepaw contacts with the glass cylinder were evaluated by counting the initial contacts of the right or left paw. Then the ratio of left and right forepaw use was calculated. Evaluation of the videotapes was performed by an observer blinded to the animals’ identities.

Corridor Task

Lateralized sensorimotor integration and neglect were examined using the corridor task [61]. For our study we used a custom-made 60 cm long, 4 cm wide, and 15 cm high alleyway equipped with 10 pairs of adjacent pots with a diameter of 1 cm, placed at 5 cm intervals and containing 5 sugar pellets (Ain-76A Rodent Tablet 20 mg TestDiet, Richmond, IN, USA). Prior to testing, the mice were food-restricted for three days and maintained at 90% of free-feeding bodyweight during habituation and testing [130]. Animals were adapted to the apparatus for 10 min each on two consecutive days with some scattered sugar pellets along the floor of the corridor and started from different ends of the corridor each day. On the test day, mice were at first positioned in an identical, but empty corridor for 5 min for adaptation and then placed at the end of the testing corridor with bowls containing the pellet. Animals were allowed to move freely along the apparatus for 5 min to retrieve pellets placed on either side of their body. The number of ipsilateral (right side) and contralateral (left side) retrievals made by each mouse was calculated and the data were expressed as a percentage of left and right retrievals of the total number of retrievals. A “retrieval” was defined as a nose poke into a bowl, whether or not pellets were taken, and a new retrieval was counted by investigating a new pot [59,61].

Stepping Test

Forelimb akinesia was assessed according to Blume et al. [64] and modified by Heuer et al. [65] using an open table (1.5 m in length). Mice were tested three times in one day during the day light cycle. Each trial was recorded on video. As a first step for habituation to the test, mice were allowed to settle at one end of the table for 1–2 s, with all limbs on the table. Secondly, the experimenter gently lifted up the hindlimbs by pulling up on the tail leaving only the forepaws touching the table surface. Then, at a steady pace of 1 m in 3–4 s the experimenter pulled the animal the total test distance of 1 m backwards by the tail. Finally, the numbers of adjusting steps made with the left and right forepaws were counted offline in the videos.

Hindlimb Clasping

Hindlimb clasping is a marker of disease progression in a number of mouse models of neurodegeneration, including certain cerebellar ataxias [131] and parkinsonian mouse models [73,74], and was performed as previously described [72,73]. Outside the cage, each mouse was slowly lifted by the tail for 10 s and then lowered back to the surface. The hindlimbs were observed and the position of the hindlimbs was scored for each trial [72]. A score of 0 indicated that the hindlimbs were consistently splayed outwards and away from the abdomen. A score of 1 indicated that one hindlimb was retracted inwards towards the abdomen more than 50% of the trial period, a score of 2 indicated that both hindlimbs were partially retracted inwards towards the abdomen for at least 50% of the observation period. Mice were tested three times on one day and each trial was recorded on video.

5.5. Receptor Autoradiography and Histology

The autoradiographic procedure was performed according to standard protocols already published [132,133,134,135,136]. Cryosections of the respective brains were stained with cresyl-violet acetate (SIGMA C1791-5G) to verify the injection sites.

5.6. Statistical Analysis

Data of all behavioral tests were subjected to two-way ANOVA with repeated measurements. The Holm–Sidak test was used for post-hoc comparisons. The level of significance was set at p ≤ 0.05 for all statistical analyses. All statistical tests were done using SigmaPlot 11 Software (Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, CA 95110, USA).

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6651/10/7/295/s1, Figure S1: Multi-receptor fingerprints of the caudate-putamen of mouse (blue) and rat (red), Figure S2: (A) Differential adjacency matrix of the rat and mouse basal ganglia. (B) Differential reciprocity matrix of rat and mouse basal ganglia.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and Supervision, V.A., A.H., O.S. and A.W.; Investigation, A.H., V.A. and A.W.; Visualization, C.H., O.S. and A.H.; Methodology, K.Z., N.P.-G. and T.M.; Writing-Original Draft Preparation , V.A., C.H., O.S., A.W., A.H., N.P.-G. and K.Z.; Writing-Review & Editing, V.A., C.H., A.W., N.P.-G. and K.Z.; Funding Acquisition, A.H., K.Z.

Funding

Rostock University Medical Center internal funding FORUN 889005 and 889014, European Union’s Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation under Grant Agreement No 720270 (Human Brain Project SGA1) (K.Z.), and Portfolio Theme “Supercomputing and Modeling for the Human Brain” of the Helmholtz Association.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge S. Lehmann, F. Winzer, M. Cremer, S. Wilms, S. Buller, J. Bausch, S. Krause and A. Börner for their excellent technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

6-OHDA6-hydroxydopamine
BoNT-Abotulinum neurotoxin-A
ChATcholine acetyltransferase
CPucaudate-putamen
D1dopamine D1 receptor
D2dopamine D2 receptor
GABAα-amino butyric acid
hemi-PDhemiparkinsonian
irimmunoreactive
nicacetylcholine nicotinic α4β2 receptor
PDParkinson’s disease
SV2Csynaptic vesicle glycoprotein C
THtyrosine hydroxylase

References

  1. Siderowf, A.; Stern, M. Update on Parkinson Disease. Ann. Intern. Med. 2003, 138, 651–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Moore, D.J.; West, A.B.; Dawson, V.L.; Dawson, T.M. Molecular Pathophysiology of Parkinson’s Disease. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2005, 28, 57–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Morin, N.; Jourdain, V.A.; Di Paolo, T. Modeling dyskinesia in animal models of Parkinson disease. Exp. Neurol. 2014, 256, 105–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Albin, R.L.; Young, A.B.; Penney, J.B. The functional anatomy of basal ganglia disorders. Trends Neurosci. 1989, 12, 366–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. DeLong, M.R.; Wichmann, T. Circuits and circuit disorders of the basal ganglia. Arch. Neurol. 2007, 64, 20–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Marsden, C.D. The mysterious motor function of the basal ganglia: The Robert Wartenberg Lecture. Neurology 1982, 32, 514–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Obeso, J.A.; Rodriguez-Oroz, M.C.; Rodriguez, M.; DeLong, M.R.; Olanow, C.W. Pathophysiology of levodopa-induced dyskinesias in Parkinson’s disease: Problems with the current model. Ann. Neurol. 2000, 47, S22–S32. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Coffield, J.A.; Yan, X. Neuritogenic actions of botulinum neurotoxin A on cultured motor neurons. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2009, 330, 352–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Pisani, A.; Bernardi, G.; Ding, J.; Surmeier, D.J. Re-emergence of striatal cholinergic interneurons in movement disorders. Trends Neurosci. 2007, 30, 545–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ding, J.; Guzman, J.N.; Tkatch, T.; Chen, S.; Goldberg, J.A.; Ebert, P.J.; Levitt, P.; Wilson, C.J.; Hamm, H.E.; Surmeier, D.J. RGS4-dependent attenuation of M4 autoreceptor function in striatal cholinergic interneurons following dopamine depletion. Nat. Neurosci. 2006, 9, 832–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Oldenburg, I.A.; Ding, J.B. Cholinergic modulation of synaptic integration and dendritic excitability in the striatum. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2011, 21, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Ztaou, S.; Maurice, N.; Camon, J.; Guiraudie-Capraz, G.; Kerkerian-Le Goff, L.; Beurrier, C.; Liberge, M.; Amalric, M. Involvement of Striatal Cholinergic Interneurons and M1 and M4 Muscarinic Receptors in Motor Symptoms of Parkinson’s Disease. J. Neurosci. 2016, 36, 9161–9172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Clarke, C.E. Medical Management of Parkinson’s Disease. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2002, 72, i22–i27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fernandez, H.H. Updates in the medical management of Parkinson disease. Clevel. Clin. J. Med. 2012, 79, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Connolly, B.S.; Lang, A.E. Pharmacological treatment of Parkinson disease: A review. JAMA 2014, 311, 1670–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Antipova, V.; Hawlitschka, A.; Mix, E.; Schmitt, O.; Dräger, D.; Benecke, R.; Wree, A. Behavioral and structural effects of unilateral intrastriatal injections of botulinum neurotoxin a in the rat model of Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurosci. Res. 2013, 91, 838–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hawlitschka, A.; Antipova, V.; Schmitt, O.; Witt, M.; Benecke, R.; Mix, E.; Wree, A. Intracerebrally applied botulinum neurotoxin in experimental neuroscience. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2013, 14, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Holzmann, C.; Dräger, D.; Mix, E.; Hawlitschka, A.; Antipova, V.; Benecke, R.; Wree, A. Effects of intrastriatal botulinum neurotoxin A on the behavior of Wistar rats. Behav. Brain Res. 2012, 234, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Wree, A.; Mix, E.; Hawlitschka, A.; Antipova, V.; Witt, M.; Schmitt, O.; Benecke, R. Intrastriatal botulinum toxin abolishes pathologic rotational behaviour and induces axonal varicosities in the 6-OHDA rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2011, 41, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Mehlan, J.; Brosig, H.; Schmitt, O.; Mix, E.; Wree, A.; Hawlitschka, A. Intrastriatal injection of botulinum neurotoxin-A is not cytotoxic in rat brain—A histological and stereological analysis. Brain Res. 2016, 1630, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Antipova, V.A.; Holzmann, C.; Schmitt, O.; Wree, A.; Hawlitschka, A. Botulinum Neurotoxin A Injected Ipsilaterally or Contralaterally into the Striatum in the Rat 6-OHDA Model of Unilateral Parkinson’s Disease Differently Affects Behavior. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2017, 11, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wedekind, F.; Oskamp, A.; Lang, M.; Hawlitschka, A.; Zilles, K.; Wree, A.; Bauer, A. Intrastriatal administration of botulinum neurotoxin A normalizes striatal D2R binding and reduces striatal D1R binding in male hemiparkinsonian rats. J. Neurosci. Res. 2018, 96, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mann, T.; Zilles, K.; Dikow, H.; Hellfritsch, A.; Cremer, M.; Piel, M.; Rösch, F.; Hawlitschka, A.; Schmitt, O.; Wree, A. Dopamine, Noradrenaline and Serotonin Receptor Densities in the Striatum of Hemiparkinsonian Rats following Botulinum Neurotoxin-A Injection. Neuroscience 2018, 374, 187–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hawlitschka, A.; Holzmann, C.; Witt, S.; Spiewok, J.; Neumann, A.M.; Schmitt, O.; Wree, A.; Antipova, V. Intrastriatally injected botulinum neurotoxin-A differently effects cholinergic and dopaminergic fibers in C57BL/6 mice. Brain Res. 2017, 1676, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Corchs, F.; Nutt, D.J.; Hince, D.A.; Davies, S.J.; Bernik, M.; Hood, S.D. Evidence for serotonin function as a neurochemical difference between fear and anxiety disorders in humans? J. Psychopharmacol. 2015, 29, 1061–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ellenbroek, B.; Youn, J. Rodent models in neuroscience research: Is it a rat race? Dis. Model. Mech. 2016, 9, 1079–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Jaramillo, S.; Zador, A.M. Mice and rats achieve similar levels of performance in an adaptive decision-making task. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2014, 8, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Klein, C.; Westenberger, A.; Hollingworth, P.; Harold, D.; Jones, L.; Owen, M.J.; Williams, J.; Marques, S.C.F.; Oliveira, C.R.; Pereira, C.M.F.; et al. Genetics of Parkinson’s Disease. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 2012, 26, a008888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Lazarov, O.; Hollands, C. Hippocampal neurogenesis: Learning to remember. Prog. Neurobiol. 2016, 138–140, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Lindström, M.; Korkeala, H. Laboratory diagnostics of botulism. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2006, 19, 298–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Overgaard, A.; Tena-Sempere, M.; Franceschini, I.; Desroziers, E.; Simonneaux, V.; Mikkelsen, J.D. Comparative analysis of kisspeptin-immunoreactivity reveals genuine differences in the hypothalamic Kiss1 systems between rats and mice. Peptides 2013, 45, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sesardic, D.; Das, R.G. Alternatives to the LD50 assay for botulinum toxin potency testing: Strategies and progress towards refinement, reduction and replacement. AATEX 2008, 14, 581–585. [Google Scholar]
  33. Wheeler, C.; Inami, G.; Mohle-Boetani, J.; Vugia, D. Sensitivity of mouse bioassay in clinical wound botulism. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009, 48, 1669–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Antonucci, F.; Rossi, C.; Gianfranceschi, L.; Rossetto, O.; Caleo, M. Long-distance retrograde effects of botulinum neurotoxin A. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28, 3689–3696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. De Leonibus, E.; Costantini, V.J.A.; Massaro, A.; Mandolesi, G.; Vanni, V.; Luvisetto, S.; Pavone, F.; Oliverio, A.; Mele, A. Cognitive and neural determinants of response strategy in the dual-solution plus-maze task. Learn. Mem. 2011, 18, 241–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Caleo, M.; Restani, L.; Gianfranceschi, L.; Costantin, L.; Rossi, C.; Rossetto, O.; Montecucco, C.; Maffei, L. Transient Synaptic Silencing of Developing Striate Cortex Has Persistent Effects on Visual Function and Plasticity. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27, 4530–4540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Schiavo, G.; Montecucco, C. Tetanus and Botulism Neurotoxins: Isolation and Assay. Methods Enzymol. 1995, 248, 643–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Montecucco, C.; Schiavo, G. Structure and Function of Tetanus and Botulinum Neurotoxins. Q. Rev. Biophys. 1995, 28, 423–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Cremer, J.N.N.; Amunts, K.; Schleicher, A.; Palomero-Gallagher, N.; Piel, M.; Rösch, F.; Zilles, K. Changes in the expression of neurotransmitter receptors in Parkin and DJ-1 knockout mice—A quantitative multireceptor study. Neuroscience 2015, 311, 539–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Cremer, J.N.; Amunts, K.; Graw, J.; Piel, M.; Rösch, F.; Zilles, K. Neurotransmitter receptor density changes in Pitx3ak mice—A model relevant to parkinson’s disease. Neuroscience 2015, 285, 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Orth, M.; Tabrizi, S.J. Models of Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 2003, 18, 729–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Le, W.; Jankovic, J. Animal models of Parkinson’s disease. Park. Dis. Diagn. Mot. Symptoms Non-Mot. Features 2013, 115, 115–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wong, P.C.; Cai, H.; Borchelt, D.R.; Price, D.L. Genetically engineered mouse models of neurodegenerative diseases. Nat. Neurosci. 2002, 5, 633–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Magen, I.; Chesselet, M.-F. Genetic mouse models of Parkinson’s disease. Recent Adv. Park. Dis. Clin. Res. 2010, 184, 53–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Blandini, F.; Armentero, M.-T. Animal models of Parkinson’s disease. FEBS J. 2012, 279, 1156–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Day, M.; Wang, Z.; Ding, J.; An, X.; Ingham, C.A.; Shering, A.F.; Wokosin, D.; Ilijic, E.; Sun, Z.; Sampson, A.R.; et al. Selective elimination of glutamatergic synapses on striatopallidal neurons in Parkinson disease models. Nat. Neurosci. 2006, 9, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Obeso, J.Á.; Marin, C.; Rodriguez-Oroz, C.; Blesa, J.; Benitez-Temiño, B.; Mena-Segovia, J.; Rodríguez, M.; Olanow, C.W. The basal ganglia in Parkinson’s disease: Current concepts and unexplained observations. Ann. Neurol. 2008, 64, S30–S46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Obeso, J.Á.; Rodríguez-Oroz, M.C.; Benitez-Temino, B.; Blesa, F.J.; Guridi, J.; Marin, C.; Rodriguez, M. Functional organization of the basal ganglia: Therapeutic implications for Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 2008, 23, S548–S559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Bordia, T.; Zhang, D.; Perez, X.A.; Quik, M. Striatal cholinergic interneurons and D2 receptor-expressing GABAergic medium spiny neurons regulate tardive dyskinesia. Exp. Neurol. 2016, 286, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Hurley, M.J.; Jenner, P. What has been learnt from study of dopamine receptors in Parkinson’s disease? Pharmacol. Ther. 2006, 111, 715–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Mamaligas, A.A.; Cai, Y.; Ford, C.P. Nicotinic and opioid receptor regulation of striatal dopamine D2-receptor mediated transmission. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 37834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Perreault, M.L.; Hasbi, A.; O’Dowd, B.F.; George, S.R. The dopamine D1–D2 receptor heteromer in striatal medium spiny neurons: Evidence for a third distinct neuronal pathway in basal ganglia. Front. Neuroanat. 2011, 5, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Rico, A.J.; Dopeso-Reyes, I.G.; Martínez-Pinilla, E.; Sucunza, D.; Pignataro, D.; Roda, E.; Marín-Ramos, D.; Labandeira-García, J.L.; George, S.R.; Franco, R.; et al. Neurochemical evidence supporting dopamine D1–D2 receptor heteromers in the striatum of the long-tailed macaque: Changes following dopaminergic manipulation. Brain Struct. Funct. 2017, 222, 1767–1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ariano, M.A.; Stromski, C.J.; Smyk-Randall, E.M.; Sibley, D.R. D2 dopamine receptor localization on striatonigral neurons. Neurosci. Lett. 1992, 144, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Brock, J.W.; Farooqui, S.; Ross, K.; Prasad, C. Localization of dopamine D2 receptor protein in rat brain using polyclonal antibody. Brain Res. 1992, 578, 244–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yung, K.K.L.; Bolam, J.P.; Smith, A.D.; Hersch, S.M.; Ciliax, B.J.; Levey, A.I. Immunocytochemical localization of D1 and D2 dopamine receptors in the basal ganglia of the rat: Light and electron microscopy. Neuroscience 1995, 65, 709–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Li, N.; Chen, T.-W.; Guo, Z.V.; Gerfen, C.R.; Svoboda, K. A motor cortex circuit for motor planning and movement. Nature 2015, 519, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Kirik, D.; Rosenblad, C.; Bjorklund, A. Preservation of a functional nigrostriatal dopamine pathway by GDNF in the intrastriatal 6-OHDA lesion model depends on the site of administration of the trophic factor. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2000, 12, 3871–3882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Dowd, E.; Monville, C.; Torres, E.M.; Dunnett, S.B. The Corridor Task: A simple test of lateralised response selection sensitive to unilateral dopamine deafferentation and graft-derived dopamine replacement in the striatum. Brain Res. Bull. 2005, 68, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Fitzsimmons, D.F.; Moloney, T.C.; Dowd, E. Further validation of the corridor task for assessing deficit and recovery in the hemi-Parkinsonian rat: Restoration of bilateral food retrieval by dopamine receptor agonism. Behav. Brain Res. 2006, 169, 352–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Grealish, S.; Mattsson, B.; Draxler, P.; Björklund, A. Characterisation of behavioural and neurodegenerative changes induced by intranigral 6-hydroxydopamine lesions in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2010, 31, 2266–2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Starkey, M.L.; Barritt, A.W.; Yip, P.K.; Davies, M.; Hamers, F.P.T.; McMahon, S.B.; Bradbury, E.J. Assessing behavioural function following a pyramidotomy lesion of the corticospinal tract in adult mice. Exp. Neurol. 2005, 195, 524–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Welniarz, Q.; Dusart, I.; Gallea, C.; Roze, E. One hand clapping: Lateralization of motor control. Front. Neuroanat. 2015, 9, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Blume, S.R.; Cass, D.K.; Tseng, K.Y. Stepping test in mice: A reliable approach in determining forelimb akinesia in MPTP-induced Parkinsonism. Exp. Neurol. 2009, 219, 208–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Heuer, A.; Smith, G.A.; Lelos, M.J.; Lane, E.L.; Dunnett, S.B. Unilateral nigrostriatal 6-hydroxydopamine lesions in mice I: Motor impairments identify extent of dopamine depletion at three different lesion sites. Behav. Brain Res. 2012, 228, 30–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Baskin, Y.K.; Dietrich, W.D.; Green, E.J. Two effective behavioral tasks for evaluating sensorimotor dysfunction following traumatic brain injury in mice. J. Neurosci. Methods 2003, 129, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Cohen, N.R.; Taylor, J.S.; Scott, L.B.; Guillery, R.W.; Soriano, P.; Furley, A.J. Errors in corticospinal axon guidance in mice lacking the neural cell adhesion molecule L1. Curr. Biol. 1998, 8, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Steward, O.; Zheng, B.; Ho, C.; Anderson, K.; Tessier-Lavigne, M. The Dorsolateral Corticospinal Tract in Mice: An Alternative Route for Corticospinal Input to Caudal Segments following Dorsal Column Lesions. J. Comp. Neurol. 2004, 472, 463–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Glajch, K.E.; Fleming, S.M.; Surmeier, D.J.; Osten, P. Sensorimotor assessment of the unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. Behav. Brain Res. 2012, 230, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Boix, J.; Padel, T.; Paul, G. A partial lesion model of Parkinson’s disease in mice—Characterization of a 6-OHDA-induced medial forebrain bundle lesion. Behav. Brain Res. 2015, 284, 196–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Fernagut, P.O.; Diguet, E.; Bioulac, B.; Tison, F. MPTP potentiates 3-nitropropionic acid-induced striatal damage in mice: Reference to striatonigral degeneration. Exp. Neurol. 2004, 185, 47–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Guyenet, S.J.; Furrer, S.A.; Damian, V.M.; Baughan, T.D.; La Spada, A.R.; Garden, G.A. A simple composite phenotype scoring system for evaluating mouse models of cerebellar ataxia. J. Vis. Exp. 2010, 2–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Morris, M.; Koyama, A.; Masliah, E.; Mucke, L. Tau reduction does not prevent motor deficits in two mouse models of Parkinson’s disease. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e29257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Lieu, C.A.; Chinta, S.J.; Rane, A.; Andersen, J.K. Age-Related Behavioral Phenotype of an Astrocytic Monoamine Oxidase-B Transgenic Mouse Model of Parkinson’s Disease. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e54200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Winkler, J.D.; Weiss, B. Reversal of supersensitive apomorphine-induced rotational behavior in mice by continuous exposure to apomorphine. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1986, 238, 242–247. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  76. Ford, C.P. The role of D2-autoreceptors in regulating dopamine neuron activity and transmission. Neuroscience 2014, 282, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Da Cunha, C.; Wietzikoski, E.C.; Ferro, M.M.; Martinez, G.R.; Vital, M.A.B.F.; Hipólide, D.; Tufik, S.; Canteras, N.S. Hemiparkinsonian rats rotate toward the side with the weaker dopaminergic neurotransmission. Behav. Brain Res. 2008, 189, 364–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Fleckenstein, A.E.; Volz, T.J.; Riddle, E.L.; Gibb, J.W.; Hanson, G.R. New insights into the mechanism of action of amphetamines. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2007, 47, 681–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Del Arco, A.; González-Mora, J.L.; Armas, V.R.; Mora, F. Amphetamine increases the extracellular concentration of glutamate in striatum of the awake rat: Involvement of high affinity transporter mechanisms. Neuropharmacology 1999, 38, 943–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Del Arco, A.; Castañeda, T.R.; Mora, F. Amphetamine releases GABA in striatum of the freely moving rat: Involvement of calcium and high affinity transporter mechanisms. Neuropharmacology 1998, 37, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hernandez, L.; Lee, F.; Hoebel, B.G. Simultaneous microdialysis and amphetamine infusion in the nucleus accumbens and striatum of freely moving rats: Increase in extracellular dopamine and serotonin. Brain Res. Bull. 1987, 19, 623–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Mandel, R.J.; Leanza, G.; Nilsson, O.G.; Rosengren, E. Amphetamine induces excess release of striatal acetylcholine in vivo that is independent of nigrostriatal dopamine. Brain Res. 1994, 653, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Mora, F.; Porras, A. Effects of amphetamine on the release of excitatory amino acid neurotransmitters in the basal ganglia of the conscious rat. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 1993, 71, 348–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Miele, M.; Mura, M.A.; Enrico, P.; Esposito, G.; Serra, P.A.; Migheli, R.; Zangani, D.; Miele, E.; Desole, M.S. On the mechanism of d-amphetamine-induced changes in glutamate, ascorbic acid and uric acid release in the striatum of freely moving rats. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2000, 129, 582–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Sulzer, D.; Sonders, M.S.; Poulsen, N.W.; Galli, A. Mechanisms of neurotransmitter release by amphetamines: A review. Prog. Neurobiol. 2005, 75, 406–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Butcher, S.P.; Fairbrother, I.S.; Kelly, J.S.; Arbuthnott, G.W. Amphetamine-Induced Dopamine Release in the Rat Striatum: An In Vivo Microdialysis Study. J. Neurochem. 1988, 50, 346–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Kroken, A.R.; Blum, F.C.; Zuverink, M.; Barbieri, J.T. Entry of Botulinum neurotoxin subtypes A1 and A2 into neurons. Infect. Immun. 2016, 85, IAI.00795-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Dong, M.; Yeh, F.; Tepp, W.H.; Dean, C.; Johnson, E.A.; Janz, R.; Chapman, E.R. SV2 Is the Protein Receptor for Botulinum Neurotoxin A. Science 2006, 312, 592–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Dardou, D.; Dassesse, D.; Cuvelier, L.; Deprez, T.; De Ryck, M.; Schiffmann, S.N. Distribution of SV2C mRNA and protein expression in the mouse brain with a particular emphasis on the basal ganglia system. Brain Res. 2011, 1367, 130–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Dardou, D.; Monlezun, S.; Foerch, P.; Courade, J.P.; Cuvelier, L.; De Ryck, M.; Schiffmann, S.N. A role for SV2C in basal ganglia functions. Brain Res. 2013, 1507, 61–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Janz, R.; Südhof, T.C. SV2C is a synaptic vesicle protein with an unusually restricted localization: Anatomy of a synaptic vesicle protein family. Neuroscience 1999, 94, 1279–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Bajjalieh, S.M.; Peterson, K.; Linial, M.; Scheller, R.H. Brain contains two forms of synaptic vesicle protein 2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 2150–2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Miyauchi, N.; Saito, A.; Karasawa, T.; Harita, Y.; Suzuki, K.; Koike, H.; Han, G.D.; Shimizu, F.; Kawachi, H. Synaptic vesicle protein 2B is expressed in podocyte, and its expression is altered in proteinuric glomeruli. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2006, 17, 2748–2759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Wang, M.M.; Janz, R.; Belizaire, R.; Frishman, L.J.; Sherry, D.M. Differential distribution and developmental expression of synaptic vesicle protein 2 isoforms in the mouse retina. J. Comp. Neurol. 2003, 460, 106–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Hayashi, M.; Yamamoto, A.; Yatsushiro, S.; Yamada, H.; Futai, M.; Yamaguchi, A.; Moriyama, Y. Synaptic vesicle protein SV2B, but not SV2A, is predominantly expressed and associated with microvesicles in rat pinealocytes. J. Neurochem. 1998, 71, 356–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Ashton, A.C.; Dolly, J.O. Characterization of the Inhibitory Action of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A on the Release of Several Transmitters from Rat Cerebrocortical Synaptosomes. J. Neurochem. 1988, 50, 1808–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Bigalke, H.; Heller, I.; Bizzini, B.; Habermann, E. Tetanus toxin and botulinum A toxin inhibit release and uptake of various transmitters, as studied with particulate preparations from rat brain and spinal cord. Naunyn. Schmiedebergs. Arch. Pharmacol. 1981, 316, 244–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Bozzi, Y.; Costantin, L.; Antonucci, F.; Caleo, M. Action of botulinum neurotoxins in the central nervous system: Antiepileptic effects. Neurotox. Res. 2006, 9, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Dunn, A.R.; Stout, K.A.; Ozawa, M.; Lohr, K.M.; Hoffman, C.A.; Bernstein, A.I.; Li, Y.; Wang, M.; Sgobio, C.; Sastry, N.; et al. Synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2C (SV2C) modulates dopamine release and is disrupted in Parkinson disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E2253–E2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Mahrhold, S.; Rummel, A.; Bigalke, H.; Davletov, B.; Binz, T. The synaptic vesicle protein 2C mediates the uptake of botulinum neurotoxin A into phrenic nerves. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580, 2011–2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  101. Pearce, L.B.; First, E.R.; MacCallum, R.D.; Gupta, A. Pharmacologic characterization of botulinum toxin for basic science and medicine. Toxicon 1997, 35, 1373–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Mann, T.; Zilles, K.; Klawitter, F.; Cremer, M.; Hawlitschka, A.; Palomero-Gallagher, N.; Schmitt, O.; Wree, A. Acetylcholine neurotransmitter receptor densities in the striatum of hemiparkinsonian rats following Botulinum neurotoxin-A injection. Front. Neuroanat. 2018, in press. [Google Scholar]
  103. Mann, T.; Zilles, K.; Frederike, V.; Höhmann, K.; Hellfritsch, A.; Van Bonn, S.; Cremer, M.; Schmitt, O.; Hawlitschka, A.; Wree, A. Glutamate, GABA and adenosine neurotransmitter receptor densities in the striatum of hemiparkinsonian rats following Botulinum neurotoxin-A injection. 2018; in press. [Google Scholar]
  104. Oh, S.W.; Harris, J.A.; Ng, L.; Winslow, B.; Cain, N.; Mihalas, S.; Wang, Q.; Lau, C.; Kuan, L.; Henry, A.M.; et al. A mesoscale connectome of the mouse brain. Nature 2014, 508, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Gerfen, C.R. Basal Ganglia. In The Rat Nervous System; Toga, A.W., Ed.; Elsevier Academic: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1994; pp. 217–227. ISBN 9780123970251. [Google Scholar]
  106. Klockgether, T. Medikamentöse behandlung der idiopathischen Parkinson-krankheit. Nervenarzt 2003, 74, S12–S21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Horstink, M.; Tolosa, E.; Bonuccelli, U.; Deuschl, G.; Friedman, A.; Kanovsky, P.; Larsen, J.P.; Lees, A.; Oertel, W.; Poewe, W.; et al. Review of the therapeutic management of Parkinson’s disease. Report of a joint task force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Movement Disorder Society-European Section. Part I: Early (uncomplicated) Parkinson’s disease. Eur. J. Neurol. 2006, 13, 1170–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Whitney, C.M. Medications for Parkinson’s disease. Neurologist 2007, 13, 387–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Orsini, M.; Leite, M.A.A.; Chung, T.M.; Bocca, W.; de Souza, J.A.; de Souza, O.G.; Moreira, R.P.; Bastos, V.H.; Teixeira, S.; Oliveira, A.B.; et al. Botulinum neurotoxin type A in neurology: Update. Neurol. Int. 2015, 7, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Chen, S. Clinical uses of botulinum neurotoxins: Current indications, limitations and future developments. Toxins 2012, 4, 913–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Jankovic, J. An update on new and unique uses of botulinum toxin in movement disorders. Toxicon 2017, 147, 84–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Jankovic, J. Botulinum toxin: State of the art. Mov. Disord. 2017, 32, 1131–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Bezard, E.; Yue, Z.; Kirik, D.; Spillantini, M.G. Animal models of Parkinson’s disease: Limits and relevance to neuroprotection studies. Mov. Disord. 2013, 28, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Deng, H.; Yuan, L. Genetic variants and animal models in SNCA and Parkinson disease. Ageing Res. Rev. 2014, 15, 161–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Pickrell, A.M.; Pinto, M.; Moraes, C.T. Mouse models of Parkinson’s disease associated with mitochondrial dysfunction. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2013, 55, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Gasior, M.; Tang, R.; Rogawski, M.A. Long-lasting attenuation of amygdala-kindled seizures after convection-enhanced delivery of botulinum neurotoxins a and B into the amygdala in rats. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2013, 346, 528–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Antonucci, F.; Bozzi, Y.; Caleo, M. Intrahippocampal infusion of botulinum neurotoxin E (BoNT/E) reduces spontaneous recurrent seizures in a mouse model of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 2009, 50, 963–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  118. Paxinos, G.; Franklin, K.B.J. The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates; Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2001; ISBN 0125476361. [Google Scholar]
  119. Paxinos, G.; Watson, C. The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates, 5th ed.; Elsevier Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; London, UK, 2005; ISBN 0120885727. [Google Scholar]
  120. Pirazzini, M.; Rossetto, O.; Eleopra, R.; Montecucco, C. Botulinum Neurotoxins: Biology, Pharmacology, and Toxicology. Pharmacol. Rev. 2017, 69, 200–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Frevert, J. Content of botulinum neurotoxin in botox®vistabel®, dysport®azzalure®, and xeomin®bocouture. Drugs R D 2010, 10, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Scaglione, F. Conversion ratio between botox®, dysport®, and xeomin® in clinical practice. Toxins 2016, 8, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Bensadoun, J.C.; Deglon, N.; Tseng, J.L.; Ridet, J.L.; Zurn, A.D.; Aebischer, P. Lentiviral vectors as a gene delivery system in the mouse midbrain: Cellular and behavioral improvements in a 6-OHDA model of Parkinson’s disease using GDNF. Exp. Neurol. 2000, 164, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Iancu, R.; Mohapel, P.; Brundin, P.; Paul, G. Behavioral characterization of a unilateral 6-OHDA-lesion model of Parkinson’s disease in mice. Behav. Brain Res. 2005, 162, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Da Conceição, F.S.L.; Ngo-Abdalla, S.; Houzel, J.-C.; Rehen, S.K. Murine model for Parkinson’s disease: From 6-OH dopamine lesion to behavioral test. J. Vis. Exp. 2010, 35, 9–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Brundin, P.; Isacson, O.; Gage, F.H.; Prochiantz, A.; Björklund, A. The rotating 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned mouse as a model for assessing functional effects of neuronal grafting. Brain Res. 1986, 366, 346–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Fu, A.; Zhou, Q.H.; Hui, E.K.W.; Lu, J.Z.; Boado, R.J.; Pardridge, W.M. Intravenous treatment of experimental Parkinson’s disease in the mouse with an IgG-GDNF fusion protein that penetrates the blood-brain barrier. Brain Res. 2010, 1352, 208–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Ungerstedt, U.; Arbuthnott, G.W. Quantitative recording of rotational behavior in rats after 6-hydroxy-dopamine lesions of the nigrostriatal dopamine system. Brain Res. 1970, 24, 485–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Schallert, T.; Tillerson, J.L. Intervention Strategies for Degeneration of Dopamine Neurons in Parkinsonism: Optimizing Behavioral Assessment of Outcome. In Central Nervous System Diseases; Emerich, D.F., Dean, R.L., Sanberg, P.R., Eds.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2000; pp. 131–151. ISBN 978-1-59259-691-1. [Google Scholar]
  130. Schackel, S.; Pauly, M.-C.; Piroth, T.; Nikkhah, G.; Döbrössy, M.D. Donor age dependent graft development and recovery in a rat model of Huntington’s disease: Histological and behavioral analysis. Behav. Brain Res. 2013, 256, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Chou, A.H.; Chen, C.Y.; Chen, S.Y.; Chen, W.J.; Chen, Y.L.; Weng, Y.S.; Wang, H.L. Polyglutamine-expanded ataxin-7 causes cerebellar dysfunction by inducing transcriptional dysregulation. Neurochem. Int. 2010, 56, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Zilles, K.; Qü, M.S.; Schröder, H.; Schleicher, A. Neurotransmitter receptors and cortical architecture. J. Hirnforsch. 1991, 32, 343–356. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  133. Zilles, K.; Werner, L.; Qü, M.; Schleicher, A.; Gross, G. Quantitative auto radiography of 11 different transmitter binding sites in the basal forebrain region of the rat-evidence of heterogeneity in distribution patterns. Neuroscience 1991, 42, 473–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Zilles, K.; Gross, G.; Schleicher, A.; Schildgen, S.; Bauer, A.; Bahro, M.; Schwendemann, G.; Zech, K.; Kolassa, N. Regional and laminar distributions of alpha 1-adrenoceptors and their subtypes in human and rat hippocampus. Neuroscience 1991, 40, 307–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Zilles, K.; Palomero-Gallagher, N.; Grefkes, C.; Scheperjans, F.; Boy, C.; Amunts, K.; Schleicher, A. Architectonics of the human cerebral cortex and transmitter receptor fingerprints: Reconciling functional neuroanatomy and neurochemistry. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2002, 12, 587–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Zilles, K.; Schleicher, A.; Palomero-Gallagher, N.; Amunts, K. Quantitative Analysis of Cyto- and Receptor Architecture of the Human Brain. In Brain Mapping: The Methods; Toga, A.W., Mazziotta, J.C., Eds.; Elsevier Academic Press: London, UK, 2002; Volume 58, pp. 573–602. ISBN 9780126930191. 0385-5600 (Print) 0385-5600 (Linking). [Google Scholar]
Toxins 10 00295 g001 550
Figure 1. Body weight over time. Asterisks indicate significant differences (25 pg, n = 15; 50 pg, n = 20) compared to the sham group (n = 11) (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). Data are means ± SEM.
Figure 1. Body weight over time. Asterisks indicate significant differences (25 pg, n = 15; 50 pg, n = 20) compared to the sham group (n = 11) (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). Data are means ± SEM.
Toxins 10 00295 g001
Toxins 10 00295 g002 550
Figure 2. (A) Apomorphine- and (B) amphetamine-induced rotations in mice treated with intrastriatal BoNT-A (25 pg, n = 15; 50 pg, n = 20) or vehicle (n = 11). (A) BoNT-A in either dosage caused a significant increase of the apomorphine-induced turning rate 1 and 3 months after injection. (B) BoNT-A in both dosages resulted in significantly increased amphetamine-induced rotations 1–9 months after injection, while sham injections did not change rotational behavior. Asterisks indicate significant differences compared with the sham group (** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). Data are means ± SEM.
Figure 2. (A) Apomorphine- and (B) amphetamine-induced rotations in mice treated with intrastriatal BoNT-A (25 pg, n = 15; 50 pg, n = 20) or vehicle (n = 11). (A) BoNT-A in either dosage caused a significant increase of the apomorphine-induced turning rate 1 and 3 months after injection. (B) BoNT-A in both dosages resulted in significantly increased amphetamine-induced rotations 1–9 months after injection, while sham injections did not change rotational behavior. Asterisks indicate significant differences compared with the sham group (** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). Data are means ± SEM.
Toxins 10 00295 g002
Toxins 10 00295 g003 550
Figure 3. (A) Apomorphine- and (B) amphetamine-induced rotations in rats intrastriatally injected with BoNT-A (n = 22) or vehicle (n = 6). (A) 1 ng BoNT-A caused a significant anti-clockwise apomorphine-induced turning 3 months after injection, (B) but did not influence amphetamine-induced rotation behavior significantly 1–9 months after BoNT-A as compared to the sham group. Asterisks indicate significant differences compared with the sham group (** p < 0.01). Data are means ± SEM.
Figure 3. (A) Apomorphine- and (B) amphetamine-induced rotations in rats intrastriatally injected with BoNT-A (n = 22) or vehicle (n = 6). (A) 1 ng BoNT-A caused a significant anti-clockwise apomorphine-induced turning 3 months after injection, (B) but did not influence amphetamine-induced rotation behavior significantly 1–9 months after BoNT-A as compared to the sham group. Asterisks indicate significant differences compared with the sham group (** p < 0.01). Data are means ± SEM.
Toxins 10 00295 g003
Toxins 10 00295 g004 550
Figure 4. (A) The cylinder test of BoNT-A-injected mice (25 pg, n = 15; 50 pg, n = 20) of both dosages revealed a significantly lower use of the left forepaw at all time points compared with sham-injected mice (n = 11). (B) In the corridor task, BoNT-A-injected mice of both dosages (25 pg, n = 11; 50 pg, n = 12) retrieved pellets significantly less often from the left side compared to the sham group (n = 10). (C,D) The stepping test revealed constant adjusting steps of sham-treated mice (n = 10). (C) Right side BoNT-A-injected mice of both dosages (25 pg, n = 11; 50 pg, n = 10) displayed significantly decreased left forepaw adjusting steps 1–9 months after surgery, whereas (D) the number of adjusting steps of the right forepaw only differed significantly from the sham group one month after BoNT-A injection. However, the 50 pg BoNT-A group also showed significantly fewer right forepaw adjusting steps 9 months after injection. Asterisks indicate significant differences compared with the sham group (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). Data are means ± SEM.
Figure 4. (A) The cylinder test of BoNT-A-injected mice (25 pg, n = 15; 50 pg, n = 20) of both dosages revealed a significantly lower use of the left forepaw at all time points compared with sham-injected mice (n = 11). (B) In the corridor task, BoNT-A-injected mice of both dosages (25 pg, n = 11; 50 pg, n = 12) retrieved pellets significantly less often from the left side compared to the sham group (n = 10). (C,D) The stepping test revealed constant adjusting steps of sham-treated mice (n = 10). (C) Right side BoNT-A-injected mice of both dosages (25 pg, n = 11; 50 pg, n = 10) displayed significantly decreased left forepaw adjusting steps 1–9 months after surgery, whereas (D) the number of adjusting steps of the right forepaw only differed significantly from the sham group one month after BoNT-A injection. However, the 50 pg BoNT-A group also showed significantly fewer right forepaw adjusting steps 9 months after injection. Asterisks indicate significant differences compared with the sham group (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). Data are means ± SEM.
Toxins 10 00295 g004
Toxins 10 00295 g005 550
Figure 5. (A) A coronal Nissl-stained brain section 30 µm thick of a mouse treated intrastriatally with 25 pg BoNT-A 6 months before sacrifice. (B,C) Higher magnifications of the boxes in (A). In (B) the needle tract through the cortex is marked by an arrow, in (C) the injection channel in the striatum is indicated by two arrows. Scale bar applies to (A): 1 mm.
Figure 5. (A) A coronal Nissl-stained brain section 30 µm thick of a mouse treated intrastriatally with 25 pg BoNT-A 6 months before sacrifice. (B,C) Higher magnifications of the boxes in (A). In (B) the needle tract through the cortex is marked by an arrow, in (C) the injection channel in the striatum is indicated by two arrows. Scale bar applies to (A): 1 mm.
Toxins 10 00295 g005
Toxins 10 00295 g006 550
Figure 6. (A) Time schedule of the stereotactic application of BoNT-A in mice and behavioral tests. Light grey rectangles symbolize batteries of non-drug-induced behavior tests, dark grey rectangles the subsequently performed apomorphine- and amphetamine-induced rotation tests. (B) Detailed visualization of single behavior test batteries. Non-drug-induced tests were performed on the days presented in the light grey part of the time line, drug-induced tests on the days of the dark grey part. The non-drug-induced tests were performed as follows: On the first day the mice underwent the cylinder test until 30 consecutive touches of the glass wall with the forepaws were done. On the second day the stepping test and on the third day the hindlimb clasping were carried out three times per mouse, respectively. On the following 3 days mice underwent food restriction and on the seventh day the corridor task was performed. Following recovery the drug-induced rotation tests were conducted.
Figure 6. (A) Time schedule of the stereotactic application of BoNT-A in mice and behavioral tests. Light grey rectangles symbolize batteries of non-drug-induced behavior tests, dark grey rectangles the subsequently performed apomorphine- and amphetamine-induced rotation tests. (B) Detailed visualization of single behavior test batteries. Non-drug-induced tests were performed on the days presented in the light grey part of the time line, drug-induced tests on the days of the dark grey part. The non-drug-induced tests were performed as follows: On the first day the mice underwent the cylinder test until 30 consecutive touches of the glass wall with the forepaws were done. On the second day the stepping test and on the third day the hindlimb clasping were carried out three times per mouse, respectively. On the following 3 days mice underwent food restriction and on the seventh day the corridor task was performed. Following recovery the drug-induced rotation tests were conducted.
Toxins 10 00295 g006

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Antipova, V.; Wree, A.; Holzmann, C.; Mann, T.; Palomero-Gallagher, N.; Zilles, K.; Schmitt, O.; Hawlitschka, A. Unilateral Botulinum Neurotoxin-A Injection into the Striatum of C57BL/6 Mice Leads to a Different Motor Behavior Compared with Rats. Toxins 2018, 10, 295. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10070295

AMA Style

Antipova V, Wree A, Holzmann C, Mann T, Palomero-Gallagher N, Zilles K, Schmitt O, Hawlitschka A. Unilateral Botulinum Neurotoxin-A Injection into the Striatum of C57BL/6 Mice Leads to a Different Motor Behavior Compared with Rats. Toxins. 2018; 10(7):295. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10070295

Chicago/Turabian Style

Antipova, Veronica, Andreas Wree, Carsten Holzmann, Teresa Mann, Nicola Palomero-Gallagher, Karl Zilles, Oliver Schmitt, and Alexander Hawlitschka. 2018. "Unilateral Botulinum Neurotoxin-A Injection into the Striatum of C57BL/6 Mice Leads to a Different Motor Behavior Compared with Rats" Toxins 10, no. 7: 295. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10070295

APA Style

Antipova, V., Wree, A., Holzmann, C., Mann, T., Palomero-Gallagher, N., Zilles, K., Schmitt, O., & Hawlitschka, A. (2018). Unilateral Botulinum Neurotoxin-A Injection into the Striatum of C57BL/6 Mice Leads to a Different Motor Behavior Compared with Rats. Toxins, 10(7), 295. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10070295

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop