Next Article in Journal
Scaffold-Free Bioprinter Utilizing Layer-By-Layer Printing of Cellular Spheroids
Next Article in Special Issue
Programmable SCOW Mesh Silicon Photonic Processor for Linear Unitary Operator
Previous Article in Journal
Using pH-Activable Carbon Nanoparticles as Cell Imaging Probes
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Review: Preparation, Performance, and Applications of Silicon Oxynitride Film
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Active On-Chip Dispersion Control Using a Tunable Silicon Bragg Grating

1
School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8LT, UK
2
Institute of Photonics, Department of Physics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1RD, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2019, 10(9), 569; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10090569
Submission received: 26 July 2019 / Revised: 23 August 2019 / Accepted: 24 August 2019 / Published: 28 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Silicon Photonics Bloom)

Abstract

:
Actively controllable dispersion in on-chip photonic devices is challenging to implement compared with free space optical components where mechanical degrees of freedom can be employed. Here, we present a method by which continuously tunable group delay control is achieved by modulating the refractive index profile of a silicon Bragg grating using thermo-optic effects. A simple thermal heater element is used to create tunable thermal gradients along the grating length, inducing chirped group delay profiles. Both effective blue and red chirp are realised using a single on-chip device over nanometre scale bandwidths. Group delay slopes are continuously tunable over a few ps/nm range from red to blue chirp, compatible with on-chip dispersion compensation for telecommunications picosecond pulse systems.

1. Introduction

Integrated Bragg grating filters are an established and widely used technology on the Silicon-on-Insultor (SOI) material platform. They are applied in a large variety of applications, including, optical filtering [1,2], sensing [3], laser cavity feedback [4] and all-optical signal processing [5,6]. A wide range of device geometries have been demonstrated in order to exercise control over the grating optical characteristics, namely the filter bandwidth [7], ripple [8], extinction and dispersion [2,9,10]. In turn, the optical characteristics of the grating can be designed through the coupling coefficient, κ , and the grating Bragg wavelength, λ B , as a function of the propagation length [10,11]. Active control of Bragg grating devices has also been demonstrated using multi-section p-n junction elements to create tunable notch features in the device stopband [12].
The control afforded by the Bragg grating device over the dispersion of a propagating signal is crucial in applications such as all-optical signal processing [5] and pulse shaping [13]. Commonly, the group delay profile of a device is varied through the local Bragg wavelength function. Therefore, by simply varying the grating period [14], or effective waveguide index, devices can be created with linear and higher order dispersion profiles [9] or even complex multi-band filter designs [15]. Filter ripple effects have been effectively minimised by suitably apodising the grating κ along its length [9,10,16]. The dispersion profile of a grating device is generally defined during the fabrication procedure as a modulation of the period [14] or effective index [17]. Some rigid tunability of the device spectrum has been demonstrated through global thermal [18] or electronic tuning [19]. Narrowband delay has also been demonstrated using multi-section gratings at the band-edge [20,21]. However, for future Photonic Integrated Circuits (PICs), true tunable dispersion on-chip will be a valuable component functionality. The principle of reconfigurable silicon photonic circuits has been well established in devices including ring resonators [22], Mach–Zehnder interferometers [23,24], and modulators [25], using both thermo-optic and carrier injection methods.
In this work, we present the design considerations for realising tunable dispersion gratings on the silicon photonics platform and present measured performance of fabricated devices. Control is demonstrated producing both red and blue chirp in a single device over bandwidths and group delay ranges compatible with picosecond pulse compensation schemes.

2. Results

2.1. Actively Tunable Bragg Grating Design

The Bragg grating device is implemented with a constant Bragg wavelength, λ B ( z ) , along its length. To create a chirp in the grating response, the Bragg wavelength function is controlled by creating a thermal gradient along the device length. A schematic of the device is shown in Figure 1.
It has been demonstrated by a number of groups that by placing a resistive element over a waveguide, the local index of refraction can be tuned through the thermo-optic effect [26,27,28]. Furthermore, due to the large mismatch in thermal conductivity of silicon and silica, the heat dissipation as a function of lateral displacement from the element allows differential heating of closely spaced structures, e.g., for tuning the coupling fraction of an evanescent field coupler [29]. Thus, by making the heater element displacement from the waveguide a function of the propagation length, local variations in refractive index, and hence Bragg wavelength, can be induced in the grating. Figure 2a shows a cross-sectional, thermal finite element model of the heater element above a silicon-on-insulator waveguide in the steady state. By varying the offset between the central axis of the heater element and the silicon waveguide, the temperature of the silicon guide can be controlled. In this example, the heater element is dissipating 11 mW of power. For power dissipation levels similar to the results presented here, the thermal control element has a temperature of tens of degrees above room temperature. The heater element then dominates the thermal state of the silicon waveguide with respect to environmental temperature variations. No active temperature stabilisation of the silicon substrate was used in this work. Figure 2b shows the relationship between the offset of the heater axis to the waveguide and the resultant waveguide temperature. The curve fits well to a quadratic function. There is a variation from the curve when the waveguide and heater are co-linear. This is due to the finite nature of the heater width, resulting in saturation of the temperature as a reducing function of offset. The thermal impedance of the silica layers also results in a high thermal gradient over micron scales, and therefore allows longitudinal chirping of the grating structure. Thus, given the quadratic relationship between offset and waveguide temperature, and the proportional relationship between temperature and material refractive index, a refractive index chirp function can be designed as a function of heater displacement from the waveguide axis.
In Figure 1, a signal injected from the left hand side of the device would see an increasing refractive index with propagation length through the grating, and therefore an effective red chirp. Alternatively, light coupled in from the right hand side of the device would see decreasing refractive index with propagation length and, therefore, effective blue chirp. The magnitude of the induced chirp is dependent on the grating length, coupling coefficient and thermal gradient. The difference in temperature and, therefore, refractive index, along the grating can be controlled electronically through the power dissipated in the heater.
To demonstrate the tunable dispersion concept, a grating response was chosen to cover bandwidths of ≈1 nm, and group delays in the picosecond range, corresponding to typical dispersion compensation requirements for picosecond telecommunications pulses. The gratings were designed on a silicon-on-insulator platform with a core layer thickness of 220 nm and a mean waveguide width of 500 nm. The grating period, Λ 0 , was set at 318 nm, to give a Bragg wavelength around 1550 nm. The grating was designed with a length of 250 μ m and a sinusoidally varying sidewall amplitude modulation, d, of 6 nm. The grating perturbation is realised as a sinusoidal variation around an average waveguide width, w. A schematic of the sidewall perturbation grating is shown in Figure 3 along with a SEM image of the fabricated device before deposition of the upper-cladding.
A Gaussian apodisation of the sidewall perturbation was applied to minimise ripples in the grating amplitude and group delay response. The grating response can simulated using a Transfer Matrix Method (TMM) model with λ B ( z ) as a parameter [30]. Since λ B ( z ) = 2 n eff ( z ) Λ 0 , where n eff ( z ) is the local modal refractive index and Λ 0 is the grating period, the grating chirp can be modelled using a variation in refractive index. The modal index is in turn dependent on the temperature at the waveguide generated by the local heater element. The heater element is fabricated using a 900 nm wide track of 50 nm thick NiCr. To create a linear chirp profile, the displacement, D ( z ) , between the centre lines of the waveguide and heater element, is varied using a z 0.5 relationship. It is worth noting that the waveguide dispersion of silicon nanowire waveguides is significant [31], and therefore must be taken into consideration when designing and modelling Bragg gratings in silicon.
Figure 4a shows a measured transmission spectrum of the fabricated device with no power dissipated on the heater, i.e., the device is unchirped. Measured device spectra can be fitted to the TMM model using a least squares curve fitting method. In this case, the form of the grating chirp is assumed, e.g., unchirped or linear blue-chirp. The coupling coefficient and the maximum and minimum effective index values at the grating ends are then left as free parameters to perform the fit. The extracted modal index from the fitting of the unchirped grating is 2.4386 and the coupling coefficient is 323 cm 1 . Furthermore, since an apodisation scheme based on variation of the grating sidewall amplitude was employed, residual ripples in the grating reflectivity and group delay spectra are still apparent. Grating coupling coefficient apodisation schemes that more effectively reduce the spectral ripple of the device, and can be fabricated within nanometric tolerances, have recently been demonstrated using phase based methods [10,16].
To assess the effects of the heater on the z-dependent modal index, the grating transmission spectrum was measured as a function of total electrical power dissipated on the heater element, P D . Figure 4b shows the measured transmission spectra, linearly varying P D up to 47.3 mW. The grating fitting was carried out in each case, assuming a linearly varying modal index as a function of the propagation length, with extreme modal index values as free parameters. The local shift of the Bragg grating along the device can be decomposed into two components: a baseline shift of the full device since the full length sees some minimum thermal increase, and a relative temperature change along the propagation direction due to the displacement of the heater section. This can be approximated as:
λ B ( z ) = 2 ( n eff , 0 + d n min + d n ( z ) ) Λ 0
where n eff , 0 is the effective modal index of the grating waveguide at room temperature, d n min is the increase in modal effective index at point of greatest displacement between the waveguide and the heater element, and d n ( z ) is the additional thermal increase along the grating length above d n min as the displacement of the heater and waveguide reduces. Figure 5 shows the extracted values of d n min and d n ( z ) max from the transmission spectra. As s expected, d n ( z ) max has a higher gradient as a function of P D than d n min , indicating the effective chirping of the grating response.

2.2. Group Delay Chirp Control

Figure 6 shows the calculated reflectivity spectra and group delay profiles for the grating, with the extracted values of d n min and d n ( z ) max as parameters. The group delay is only calculated for the portion of the reflectivity spectrum above 90 % of its maximum value.
The group delay profile of the grating response shows a sensitivity to the induced refractive index profile, with an increasing blue chirp developing across the central region of the grating reflectivity band. The wide stopband, due to the high grating coupling coefficient, means that, even for chirped gratings, there is a portion of the reflection band with flat group delay. As noted previously, 1 nm bandwidths are considered here, corresponding to typical telecommunications picosecond pulse sources. By selecting a particular central wavelength within the grating stopband, controllable chirp can be exhibited as a function of power dissipated on the heater. For example, sub-bands centred at 1551 nm and 1552.2 nm are shown in Figure 7a,b, respectively. In Figure 7a, increasing the dissipated power on the heater induces a variation in the blue chirped gradient of the group delay in the few ps/nm range. Alternatively, by selecting a central wavelength towards the red tuned side of the grating reflection spectrum, a range of chirp values spanning from blue to red chirp can be accessed, as shown in Figure 7b. As this change from blue to red chirp crosses a zero dispersion condition, the absolute chirp rate is less than the blue chirp rate achievable at similar power dissipation levels, at bands further detuned from this wavelength.
The group delay of the fabricated tunable grating was measured as detailed in Section 5. Figure 8 shows the measured group delay as a function of power dissipated on the heater.
As expected, there is a clear increase of the group delay in the centre of the band, indicating increasing blue chirp of the spectrum. Evidence of the residual ripple in the grating reflectivity is also apparent in the group delay kink developing for increasing dispersion. Figure 9a,b shows sub-bands of the grating response centred around 1551.7 and 1553 nm, respectively. As predicted, for the lower wavelength range, increasing the heater power creates an increasing group delay slope, with effective blue chirp. In the longer wavelength band, both blue and red chirp responses can be accessed, passing through a flat group delay characteristic.
Figure 10 presents the average group delay slope for both sub-bands in Figure 9. In both cases, quasi-continuous tuning of the group delay slope is demonstrated in the ps/nm range, with both blue and red chirp accessible from a single device and from a single injection direction.

3. Discussion

By integrating a thermal heater element with a varying displacement along the length of a uniform Bragg grating device, thermal gradients and therefore local modal refractive index profiles have been imposed onto the device. The strong grating coupling coefficient means that the full group delay profile is complex, with both blue and red chirp regions occurring over a bandwidth of a few nanometres. However, this can be used to sub-select regions of interest for dispersion control over nanometre scale bands, suitable for picosecond pulse systems. In this way, both blue and red chirp control have been demonstrated in a single device. The group delay slope is also related to the grating length, i.e., longer physical distances between grating sections tuned to different spectral components will induce larger group delay shifts between those spectral components [32]. Therefore, to tailor the accessible maximum group delay slope, the grating length can be defined as a design parameter. Figure 11 shows TMM simulated grating reflectivity and group delay spectra, dependent on the grating length. In these simulations, the thermal index gradient was assumed to be linear and corresponding to the measurement conditions for the maximum power dissipated on the thermal heater of 47.3 mW. The apodisation profile is Gaussian.
The group delay range across the spectrum is, as expected, dependent on the grating length. Therefore, devices can be designed based on the required application requirements.
In addition to the relative group delay dispersion induced across the device, the absolute spectral position of the grating response is dependent on two main factors. The first is related to fabrication tolerances in the manufacture of the device. Since the absolute Bragg wavelength of a fixed period grating is proportional to its effective modal index, any variation from the design geometry will lead to a shift in the resultant Bragg spectrum. However, in high resolution fabrication schemes such as optimised electron beam or deep ultraviolet (UV) lithography, such variations are global rather than local. That is, the average waveguide width may vary from run to run, or even between spatially separated devices, but is unlikely to see significant variation across a single device. Typical geometrical variations can be in the nanometre range, leading to effective index variations in the order of 10 3 10 2 [33]. The second factor affecting the absolute spectral position of the Bragg grating response is the global thermal shift experienced by the full grating when the heater is electrically driven. The thermal element induces both a global wavelength shift of the grating characteristic and a local gradient to induce the chirped profile, as detailed in Figure 5, The global, or minimum index, shift experienced by the full grating is in the order of 10 3 , comparable with any potential geometric effects. To implement control over both the group delay slope and central wavelength, a second heater element could be implemented parallel to the Bragg grating. This element would produce a rigid index shift of the full grating response, shifting the demonstrated group delay curves in wavelength. Therefore, using both heater controls, varying group delay slopes in both chirp directions could be accessed at a single central wavelength, as long as the un-heated grating central Bragg wavelength was designed to be at a shorter wavelength than the required application space.

4. Conclusions

Control over the group delay slope of an integrated silicon Bragg grating is achieved using a simple thermal tuning element. Spatial displacement of the heater along the propagation length of the grating produces a longitudinal variation in modal effective index, and, therefore, dispersion. Variation of the electrical power dissipated by the heater allows for control over the group delay slope, with fabricated devices covering the range of 0–3 ps/nm over nanometre range bandwidths. This range is ultimately limited by the grating length and can be designed for specific applications before fabrication. Finally, due to the strong coupling coefficient of the gratings presented in this work, both blue and red chirp have been demonstrated in a single device, with the possibility to tune across this full range for a particular central wavelength condition.

5. Materials and Methods

5.1. Device Fabrication

The devices were fabricated on a 220 nm thick silicon core on a buried oxide lower cladding layer of 2 μ m. The patterns were written using e-beam lithography into hydrogen silsesquioxane (HSQ) resist that was subsequently used as a hardmask for Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP)-Reactive Ion Etching (RIE) etching of the silicon. Polymer spot-size convertors [34] were fabricated to match the input lensed fibre mode to the waveguides. The final devices were coated with a 900 nm thick silica uppercladding before definition of the heater elements and electrical transmission lines. The heaters were fabricated as 900 nm wide strips of 50 nm thick NiCr. Multiple point contacts on the heater lines were defined to reduce the necessary voltage required to drive the device, as shown in the schematic of Figure 1. The heaters were divided into 50 μ m long sections, each with a resistance of ≈1.5 k Ω , and were driven in an alternating positive/ground, arrangement.

5.2. Transmission and Group Delay Measurements

The Bragg grating devices were probed using a tunable laser coupled through fibre polarisation optics and a lensed fibre tip to the chip, as shown in Figure 12.
The transmission spectra were measured by coupling the light from the output facet of the device bar to an objective lens and InGaAs photodiode. The reflected spectra were captured by coupling the back reflected light from the chip through a circulator to an InGaAs photodiode. Both photodiode signals were measured using an oscilloscope, triggered from the swept tunable laser source. The reflected spectra exhibit Fabry–Perot interference fringes created by the cavity formed between the reflective facet of the device bar and the Bragg grating, as shown in Figure 13. While the device bar facet is a broadband reflector with a spatially fixed position, the grating group delay profile creates a reflector with an effective spatial position that is wavelength dependent. Therefore, the effective Fabry–Perot cavity length is wavelength dependent and will create interference fringes that are directly related to the group delay response of the grating. This interference allows the direct extraction of the Fabry–Perot cavity phase, and hence group delay, introduced by the grating element as detailed in [35]. Figure 8 shows the measured group delay curves for the device measured using this Fabry–Perot technique.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, M.S. and M.J.S.; Funding acquisition, M.S. and M.J.S.; Methodology, C.K. and M.J.S.; Software, M.J.S.; Writing—original draft, C.K. and M.J.S.; and Writing—review and editing, C.K., M.S. and M.J.S.

Funding

This research was funded by EPSRC grant numbers EP/P013597/1, EP/P013570/1, and EP/L021129/1.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support of the James Watt Nanofabrication Centre staff.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Harris, N.C.; Grassani, D.; Simbula, A.; Pant, M.; Galli, M.; Baehr-jones, T.; Hochberg, M.; Englund, D.; Bajoni, D.; Galland, C. Integrated Source of Spectrally Filtered Correlated Photons for Large-Scale Quantum Photonic Systems. Phys. Rev. X 2014, 4, 041047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Oser, D.; Mazeas, F.; Le Roux, X.; Pérez-Galacho, D.; Alibart, O.; Tanzilli, S.; Labonté, L.; Marris-Morini, D.; Vivien, L.; Cassan, É.; et al. Coherency-Broken Bragg Filters: Overcoming On-Chip Rejection Limitations. Laser Photonics Rev. 2019, 13, 1800226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Prabhathan, P.; Murukeshan, V.M.; Jing, Z.; Ramana, P.V. Compact SOI nanowire refractive index sensor using phase shifted Bragg grating. Opt. Express 2009, 17, 15330–15341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhang, C.; Srinivasan, S.; Tang, Y.; Heck, M.J.R.; Davenport, M.L.; Bowers, J.E. Low threshold and high speed short cavity distributed feedback hybrid silicon lasers. Opt. Express 2014, 22, 10202–10209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Burla, M.; Cortés, L.R.; Li, M.; Wang, X.; Chrostowski, L.; Azaña, J. Integrated waveguide Bragg gratings for microwave photonics signal processing. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 25120–25147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Rutkowska, K.A.; Duchesne, D.; Strain, M.J.; Morandotti, R.; Sorel, M.; Azaña, J. Ultrafast all-optical temporal differentiators based on CMOS-compatible integrated-waveguide Bragg gratings. Opt. Express 2011, 19, 19514–19522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, X.; Shi, W.; Yun, H.; Grist, S.; Jaeger, N.A.; Chrostowski, L. Narrow-band waveguide Bragg gratings on SOI wafers with CMOS-compatible fabrication process. Opt. Express 2012, 20, 15547–15558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Veerasubramanian, V.; Beaudin, G.; Giguere, A.; Le Drogoff, B.; Aimez, V.; Kirk, A.G. Design and Demonstration of Apodized Comb Filters on SOI. IEEE Photonics J. 2012, 4, 1133–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, G.F.R.; Wang, T.; Donnelly, C.; Tan, D.T.H. Second and third order dispersion generation using nonlinearly chirped silicon waveguide gratings. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 29223–29230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cheng, R.; Han, Y.; Chrostowski, L. Characterization and compensation of apodization phase noise in silicon integrated Bragg gratings. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 9516–9535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Strain, M.J.; Sorel, M. Design and fabrication of integrated chirped Bragg gratings for on-chip dispersion control. Quantum Electron. IEEE J. 2010, 46, 774–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, W.; Yao, J. A fully reconfigurable waveguide Bragg grating for programmable photonic signal processing. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Rivas, L.M.; Strain, M.J.; Duchesne, D.; Carballar, A.; Sorel, M.; Morandotti, R.; Azaña, J. Picosecond linear optical pulse shapers based on integrated waveguide Bragg gratings. Opt. Lett. 2008, 33, 2425–2427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tan, D.T.H.; Ikeda, K.; Saperstein, R.E.; Slutsky, B.; Fainman, Y. Chip-scale dispersion engineering using chirped vertical gratings. Opt. Lett. 2008, 33, 3013–3015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Strain, M.J.; Thoms, S.; MacIntyre, D.S.; Sorel, M. Multi-wavelength filters in silicon using superposition sidewall Bragg grating devices. Opt. Lett. 2014, 39, 413–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Cheng, R.; Chrostowski, L. Apodization of Silicon Integrated Bragg Gratings through Periodic Phase Modulation. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2019, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kim, M.s.; Ju, J.J.; Park, S.K.; Lee, M.H.; Kim, S.H.; Lee, K.D. Tailoring Chirp Characteristics of Waveguide Bragg Gratings Using Tapered Core Profiles. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2006, 18, 2413–2415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Giuntoni, I.; Stolarek, D.; Kroushkov, D.I.; Bruns, J.; Zimmermann, L.; Tillack, B.; Petermann, K. Continuously tunable delay line based on SOI tapered Bragg gratings. Opt. Express 2012, 20, 11241–11246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Khan, S.; Baghban, M.A.; Fathpour, S. Electronically tunable silicon photonic delay lines. Opt. Express 2011, 19, 11780–11785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Jiang, L.; Huang, Z.R. Integrated Cascaded Bragg Gratings for On-Chip Optical Delay Lines. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2018, 30, 499–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chung, C.J.; Xu, X.; Wang, G.; Pan, Z.; Chen, R.T. On-chip optical true time delay lines featuring one-dimensional fishbone photonic crystal waveguide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2018, 112, 071104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zheng, X.; Patil, D.; Lexau, J.; Liu, F.; Li, G.; Thacker, H.; Luo, Y.; Shubin, I.; Li, J.; Yao, J.; et al. Ultra-efficient 10 Gb/s hybrid integrated silicon photonic transmitter and receiver. Opt. Express 2011, 19, 5172–5186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Orlandi, P.; Morichetti, F.; Strain, M.J.; Sorel, M.; Bassi, P.; Melloni, A. Photonic Integrated Filter with Widely Tunable Bandwidth. J. Light. Technol. 2014, 32, 897–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pérez, D.; Gasulla, I.; Crudgington, L.; Thomson, D.J.; Khokhar, A.Z.; Li, K.; Cao, W.; Mashanovich, G.Z.; Capmany, J. Multipurpose silicon photonics signal processor core. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Reed, G.T.; Mashanovich, G.; Gardes, F.Y.; Thomson, D.J. Silicon optical modulators. Nat. Photonics 2010, 4, 518–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Atabaki, A.H.; Eftekhar, A.A.; Yegnanarayanan, S.; Adibi, A. Sub-100-nanosecond thermal reconfiguration of silicon photonic devices. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 18312–18323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Densmore, A.; Janz, S.; Ma, R.; Schmid, J.H.; Xu, D.X.; Delâge, A.; Lapointe, J.; Vachon, M.; Cheben, P. Compact and low power thermo-optic switch using folded silicon waveguides. Opt. Express 2009, 17, 10457–10465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Dong, P.; Qian, W.; Liang, H.; Shafiiha, R.; Feng, D.; Li, G.; Cunningham, J.E.; Krishnamoorthy, A.V.; Asghari, M. Thermally tunable silicon racetrack resonators with ultralow tuning power. Opt. Express 2010, 18, 20298–20304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Orlandi, P.; Morichetti, F.; Strain, M.J.; Sorel, M.; Melloni, A.; Bassi, P. Tunable silicon photonics directional coupler driven by a transverse temperature gradient. Opt. Lett. 2013, 38, 863–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Yamada, M.; Sakuda, K. Analysis of almost-periodic distributed feedback slab waveguides via a fundamental matrix approach. Appl. Opt. 1987, 26, 3474–3478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Turner, A.C.; Manolatou, C.; Schmidt, B.S.; Lipson, M.; Foster, M.a.; Sharping, J.E.; Gaeta, A.L. Tailored anomalous group-velocity dispersion in silicon channel waveguides. Opt. Express 2006, 14, 4357–4362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Sahin, E.; Ooi, K.J.; Png, C.E.; Tan, D.T. Large, scalable dispersion engineering using cladding-modulated Bragg gratings on a silicon chip. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 110, 161113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Samarelli, A.; Macintyre, D.S.; Strain, M.J.; De La Rue, R.M.; Sorel, M.; Thoms, S. Optical characterization of a hydrogen silsesquioxane lithography process. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B Microelectron. Nanometer Struct. 2008, 26, 2290–2294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Roelkens, G.; Dumon, P.; Bogaerts, W.; Van Thourhout, D.; Baets, R. Efficient silicon-on-insulator fiber coupler fabricated using 248-nm-deep UV lithography. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2005, 17, 2613–2615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Skaar, J. Measuring the group delay of fiber Bragg gratings by use of end-reflection interference. Opt. Lett. 1999, 24, 1020–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic of a Bragg grating with an integrated heater element. The displacement between the waveguide axis and heater central position is a function of propagation length, with a maximum displacement D.
Figure 1. Schematic of a Bragg grating with an integrated heater element. The displacement between the waveguide axis and heater central position is a function of propagation length, with a maximum displacement D.
Micromachines 10 00569 g001
Figure 2. (a) FEM thermal model of a heater element co-axial with a silicon-on-insulator waveguide; and (b) calculated temperature of the silicon waveguide as a function of offset of the heater central axis from the central axis of the waveguide.
Figure 2. (a) FEM thermal model of a heater element co-axial with a silicon-on-insulator waveguide; and (b) calculated temperature of the silicon waveguide as a function of offset of the heater central axis from the central axis of the waveguide.
Micromachines 10 00569 g002
Figure 3. (a) Schematic of a sinusoidal sidewall perturbation Bragg grating, and (b) SEM image of a fabricated device.
Figure 3. (a) Schematic of a sinusoidal sidewall perturbation Bragg grating, and (b) SEM image of a fabricated device.
Micromachines 10 00569 g003
Figure 4. (a) Measured and fitted Bragg grating transmission spectra of the grating device in the unchirped state; and (b) measured grating spectra for increasing power dissipation, P D , on the thermal heating element.
Figure 4. (a) Measured and fitted Bragg grating transmission spectra of the grating device in the unchirped state; and (b) measured grating spectra for increasing power dissipation, P D , on the thermal heating element.
Micromachines 10 00569 g004
Figure 5. Variation in minimum and maximum thermally induced modal refractive index shifts of the device extracted from fitting of the transmission spectra.
Figure 5. Variation in minimum and maximum thermally induced modal refractive index shifts of the device extracted from fitting of the transmission spectra.
Micromachines 10 00569 g005
Figure 6. (a) Simulated reflectivity; and (b) group delay of a Bragg grating device with thermally induced refractive index differences as parameters.
Figure 6. (a) Simulated reflectivity; and (b) group delay of a Bragg grating device with thermally induced refractive index differences as parameters.
Micromachines 10 00569 g006
Figure 7. Simulated group delay bands as a function of dissipated power on the heater centred at: (a) 1551 nm; and (b) 1552.2 mn.
Figure 7. Simulated group delay bands as a function of dissipated power on the heater centred at: (a) 1551 nm; and (b) 1552.2 mn.
Micromachines 10 00569 g007
Figure 8. Measured group delay tuning as a function of dissipated power on the heater.
Figure 8. Measured group delay tuning as a function of dissipated power on the heater.
Micromachines 10 00569 g008
Figure 9. Measured group delay bands as a function of dissipated power on the heater centred at: (a) 1551.7 nm; and (b) 1553 mn.
Figure 9. Measured group delay bands as a function of dissipated power on the heater centred at: (a) 1551.7 nm; and (b) 1553 mn.
Micromachines 10 00569 g009
Figure 10. Measured group delay slope as a function of dissipated power on the heater corresponding to the dispersion bands centred at 1551.7 nm; and 1553 nm.
Figure 10. Measured group delay slope as a function of dissipated power on the heater corresponding to the dispersion bands centred at 1551.7 nm; and 1553 nm.
Micromachines 10 00569 g010
Figure 11. Simulated grating: (a) reflectivity; and (b) group delay spectra with grating length as a parameter.
Figure 11. Simulated grating: (a) reflectivity; and (b) group delay spectra with grating length as a parameter.
Micromachines 10 00569 g011
Figure 12. Transmission and group delay measurement setup. (Pol., polarisation; PD, photodiode).
Figure 12. Transmission and group delay measurement setup. (Pol., polarisation; PD, photodiode).
Micromachines 10 00569 g012
Figure 13. (a) Measured reflectivity spectrum of the grating with no induced chirp; and (b) detailed spectrum of the Fabry–Perot fringes created by the intereference between the device bar facet and grating reflector.
Figure 13. (a) Measured reflectivity spectrum of the grating with no induced chirp; and (b) detailed spectrum of the Fabry–Perot fringes created by the intereference between the device bar facet and grating reflector.
Micromachines 10 00569 g013

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Klitis, C.; Sorel, M.; Strain, M.J. Active On-Chip Dispersion Control Using a Tunable Silicon Bragg Grating. Micromachines 2019, 10, 569. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10090569

AMA Style

Klitis C, Sorel M, Strain MJ. Active On-Chip Dispersion Control Using a Tunable Silicon Bragg Grating. Micromachines. 2019; 10(9):569. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10090569

Chicago/Turabian Style

Klitis, Charalambos, Marc Sorel, and Michael J. Strain. 2019. "Active On-Chip Dispersion Control Using a Tunable Silicon Bragg Grating" Micromachines 10, no. 9: 569. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10090569

APA Style

Klitis, C., Sorel, M., & Strain, M. J. (2019). Active On-Chip Dispersion Control Using a Tunable Silicon Bragg Grating. Micromachines, 10(9), 569. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10090569

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop