Next Article in Journal
Step-Wise Deposition Process for Dielectrophoretic Formation of Conductive 50-Micron-Long Carbon Nanotube Bridges
Previous Article in Journal
Editorial for the Special Issue on Organs-on-Chips
Previous Article in Special Issue
Microfluidic Systems Applied in Solid-State Nanopore Sensors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Microfluidic Devices for Biomedical Applications: Biomedical Microfluidic Devices 2019

SMALL (Sensors and MicroActuators Learning Lab), Department of Electrical Engineering & Department of Biomedical Engineering, University at Buffalo, State University of New York (SUNY-Buffalo), Buffalo, NY 14260, USA
Micromachines 2020, 11(4), 370; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11040370
Submission received: 30 March 2020 / Accepted: 30 March 2020 / Published: 1 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomedical Microfluidic Devices 2019)
Microfluidic devices and systems are well-suited for the manipulation of biomolecules, cells, or particles. These microfluidic devices are capable of a variety of functions to replace routine biomedical analysis and diagnostics, highlighting a higher-level system integration with improved potential for automation, control, and high-throughput processing, while consuming a small volume of samples and reagents at shorter bioassay times and reduced cost [1]. This Special Issue of Micromachines, entitled Biomedical Microfluidic Devices 2019, provides a discussion of the technical challenges associated with developing microfluidic devices for biomedical applications. Addressing these challenges requires technological advances in many areas, including sensing [2,3,4]; cell manipulation [5,6]; cell, tissue, and organ culture platforms [7,8,9]; and micropumping technologies [10]. This Special Issue consists of nine high-quality papers, including one insightful review article [2].
Sensors: On-chip sensors integrated with microfluidic devices have great potential in lab-on-chip or stand-alone systems for various biological and biomedical applications. A review article by Fu et al. [2] summarizes the fundamental configuration of a device combining solid-state nanopores and microfluidic systems, detection improvement from a multichannel approach, multifunctional detection resulting from an optical–electrical detection method, high-level integration, and a prototype for commercialization. Using impedance spectroscopy, Karimi et al. [3] report the study of the impedance behavior of platelet-poor plasma (PPP) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in a microflow chamber with interchangeable biomimetic surfaces to evaluate global hemostasis. Lin et al. [4] study a simple microfluidic device using planar electrodes for the measurement of the imaginary part of the Clausius–Mossotti factor, Ki, for cells and particles involved in electrorotation (ER) and travelling wave dielectrophoresis (twDEP). The measurement of Ki would be beneficial for the study of the torque in ER, the force in twDEP, the dielectric properties of cells, or physical phenotyping of different cells.
Cell manipulation: The manipulation of individual cells of interest is critical to further studies of phenotypic heterogeneity occurring due to molecular and cellular stochastic processes, phases of cells, asymmetric partitioning during cell division, and inhomogeneous cellular environments. To overcome this challenge, Kumar et al. [5] present a digital microfluidic droplet device for single bacterium capture and selective retrieval from a population using optical tweezers. Among cell manipulation techniques, the use of inertial microfluidics using no external forces is of great interest, because microfluidic systems are simple and suitable for high-throughput cell sorting and analysis. Suwannaphan et al. [6] studied two inertial separation techniques using a spiral microchannel and a contraction–expansion array for the investigation of leukocyte viability and damage, along with the separation efficiency of the devices.
Cell, tissue, and organ culture platforms: Cultured cells in Petri dishes and tissue culture flasks (i.e., in vitro) experience completely different environmental cues compared to natural tissues within a complex three-dimensional extracellular matrix (i.e., in vivo), resulting in radical variations in cell morphology and function. Miniaturized culture systems (i.e., ex vivo) are capable of more advanced tissue functions as compared to any current in vivo studies. This allows for more accurate study of complex mechanisms underlying tissue growth, renewal, and disease than any current in vitro models, without the difficulties inherent to in vivo studies. Baydoun et al. [7] present ex vivo intestinal tissue culture models to cultivate full-thickness murine colon explants, which maintain the morphological structures of the tissues for up to eight days. Additionally, they studied numerical simulation of the transport of oxygen and glucose to improve the functionality of biomedical microfluidic devices. Luo et al. [8] designed an integrated microfluidic device for culture of individual coral polyps, featuring a uniform flow environment, rapid mass transfer, and precise temperature control. The microfluidic device provided a reliable analytical approach for model and mechanism investigations of coral bleaching and reef conservation. Williams et al. [9] tackled one of the troublesome issues in microfluidic cell culture platforms, whereby undesired trapping of air bubbles in the passage often causes cell damage or device delamination. To prevent air bubble entry into microfluidic channels, they demonstrated a debubbler module that can rapidly remove bubble volumes spanning three orders of magnitude from segmented flows, at flow rates compatible with those required for microfluidic shear stimulation studies.
Micropumping: One feature that is highly demanded in biomedical lab-on-chip or point-of-care devices is compact, robust, self-driven micropumping without any complex external systems. To overcome the challenges associated with this feature, a variety of pumping methods have been developed, such as finger-actuated pumping, capillary pumping, gravity-driven pumping, and pre-degassed pumping. Among these, a vacuum-assisted pumping method utilizing the gas permeability or solubility of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) is extremely suitable for many biomedical microfluidic systems due to its simple implementation. Wang et al. [10] introduced a compact, syringe-assisted, vacuum-driven micropumping module that can be easily attached to the outlet of any existing microfluidics device, providing greater flexibility in many biomedical applications.
I am sure that this Special Issue will be of high interest for many areas of research involved in the multidisciplinary field of biomedical microfluidic devices. I look forward to you sharing your stories of technical challenges and great solutions in the additional Special Issue of Micromachines: Biomedical Microfluidic Devices 2020.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Oh, K.W. Multidisciplinary Role of Microfluidics for Biomedical and Diagnostic Applications: Biomedical Microfluidic Devices. Micromachines 2017, 8, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Fu, J.; Wu, L.; Qiao, Y.; Tu, J.; Lu, Z. Microfluidic Systems Applied in Solid-State Nanopore Sensors. Micromachines 2020, 11, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Karimi, S.; Farré-Lladós, J.; Mir, E.; Escolar, G.; Casals-Terré, J. Hemostasis-On-a-Chip: Impedance Spectroscopy Meets Microfluidics for Hemostasis Evaluation. Micromachines 2019, 10, 534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Lin, Y.-Y.; Lo, Y.-J.; Lei, U. Measurement of the Imaginary Part of the Clausius-Mossotti Factor of Particle/Cell via Dual Frequency Electrorotation. Micromachines 2020, 11, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Tewari Kumar, P.; Decrop, D.; Safdar, S.; Passaris, I.; Kokalj, T.; Puers, R.; Aertsen, A.; Spasic, D.; Lammertyn, J. Digital Microfluidics for Single Bacteria Capture and Selective Retrieval Using Optical Tweezers. Micromachines 2020, 11, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Suwannaphan, T.; Srituravanich, W.; Sailasuta, A.; Piyaviriyakul, P.; Bhanpattanakul, S.; Jeamsaksiri, W.; Sripumkhai, W.; Pimpin, A. Investigation of Leukocyte Viability and Damage in Spiral Microchannel and Contraction-Expansion Array. Micromachines 2019, 10, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Baydoun, M.; Treizeibré, A.; Follet, J.; Vanneste, S.B.; Creusy, C.; Dercourt, L.; Delaire, B.; Mouray, A.; Viscogliosi, E.; Certad, G.; et al. An Interphase Microfluidic Culture System for the Study of Ex Vivo Intestinal Tissue. Micromachines 2020, 11, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Luo, Y.; Zhao, J.; He, C.; Lu, Z.; Lu, X. Miniaturized Platform for Individual Coral Polyps Culture and Monitoring. Micromachines 2020, 11, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Williams, M.J.; Lee, N.K.; Mylott, J.A.; Mazzola, N.; Ahmed, A.; Abhyankar, V.V. A Low-Cost, Rapidly Integrated Debubbler (RID) Module for Microfluidic Cell Culture Applications. Micromachines 2019, 10, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Wang, A.; Koh, D.; Schneider, P.; Breloff, E.; Oh, K.W. A Compact, Syringe-Assisted, Vacuum-Driven Micropumping Device. Micromachines 2019, 10, 543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oh, K.W. Microfluidic Devices for Biomedical Applications: Biomedical Microfluidic Devices 2019. Micromachines 2020, 11, 370. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11040370

AMA Style

Oh KW. Microfluidic Devices for Biomedical Applications: Biomedical Microfluidic Devices 2019. Micromachines. 2020; 11(4):370. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11040370

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oh, Kwang W. 2020. "Microfluidic Devices for Biomedical Applications: Biomedical Microfluidic Devices 2019" Micromachines 11, no. 4: 370. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11040370

APA Style

Oh, K. W. (2020). Microfluidic Devices for Biomedical Applications: Biomedical Microfluidic Devices 2019. Micromachines, 11(4), 370. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11040370

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop