Next Article in Journal
Non-Local Mean Denoising Algorithm Based on Fractional Compact Finite Difference Scheme Effectively Reduces Speckle Noise in Optical Coherence Tomography Images
Previous Article in Journal
Modeling and Design Optimization of a New Piezoelectric Inchworm Actuator with Screw Clamping Mechanisms
Previous Article in Special Issue
Microfluidic Synthesis, Doping Strategy, and Optoelectronic Applications of Nanostructured Halide Perovskite Materials
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Perovskite Random Lasers, Process and Prospects

School of Instrument Science and Opto-Electronics Engineering, Beijing Information Science and Technology University, Beijing 100192, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2022, 13(12), 2040; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13122040
Submission received: 25 October 2022 / Revised: 11 November 2022 / Accepted: 14 November 2022 / Published: 22 November 2022

Abstract

:
Random lasers (RLs) are a kind of coherent light source with optical feedback based on disorder-induced multiple scattering effects instead of a specific cavity. The unique feedback mechanism makes RLs different from conventional lasers. They have the advantages of small volume, flexible shape, omnidirectional emission, etc., and have broad application prospects in the fields of laser illumination, speckle-free imaging, display, and sensing. Colloidal metal-halide perovskite nanomaterials are a hot research field in light sources. They have been considered as desired gain media owing to their superior properties, such as high photoluminescence, tunable emission wavelengths, and easy fabrication processes. In this review, we summarize the research progress of RLs based on perovskite nanomaterials. We first present the evolution of the RLs based on the perovskite quantum dots (QDs) and perovskite films. The fabrication process of perovskite nano-/microstructures and lasers is discussed in detail. After that, the frontier applications of perovskite RLs are discussed. Finally, the challenges are discussed, and the prospects for further development are proposed.

1. Introduction

Random lasers (RLs), in which the optical feedback comes from the multiple scattering of the random media, have drawn much attention over the past decades [1,2,3,4,5]. In contrast to conventional lasers, RLs have many distinctive features, such as small volume, flexible shape, low fabrication cost, and omnidirectional emission. They show broad application prospects in the fields of high-brightness illumination, laser display, speckle-free imaging, and medical diagnostics [6,7,8,9,10,11]. The random lasing-like emission was first reported on from a solution containing rhodamine 640 and TiO2 particles by Lawandy in 1994 [12]. In 1999, the RL with extremely narrow peaks was observed from the ZnO powers by Cao et al. [13]. Since then, many light-emitting materials, such as organic fluorescent dye, oxide powders, semiconductor nanomaterials, and rare earth materials, have been used as the gain media of RLs [9,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25].
In the past few years, colloidal metal-halide perovskites have become a global research hot spot [26,27,28,29,30]. Perovskites have a general chemical formula of ABX3, A2BX5, A4BX6, and two-dimensional (2D) Ruddlesden–Popper of L2An−1BnX3n+1, where A is CH3NH3 (MA), Cs, NH2-CH = NH2 (FA), etc.; B is Pb, Sn, Ge, etc.; X is Cl, Br, and I; and L is long organic chains [29,31]. They have attracted extensive attention in the fields of solar cells, light-emitting diodes, displays, and photodetectors because of the advantages of high carrier mobility, long carrier lifetime, high luminescence quantum yield (QY), narrow band emission, and simple solution fabrication processes [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39].
The stability of halide perovskite materials is associated with the volatility of the A-site cation halides and the ligand anchoring groups. Typically, the thermal stability is in the order MAPbBr3 << FAPbX3 < CsPbBr3 [40]. Perovskite semiconductors, in the form of quantum dots (QDs), polycrystal thin films, and bulk single crystals, are also one kind of high-performance laser gain materials due to their high single/multiphoton absorption coefficient, low non-radiative recombination, high QY, and broad emission wavelength range [41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56]. In March 2014, Xing et al. first revealed that solution-processed perovskites were a new class of robust gain media with highly desirable characteristics [57]. They demonstrated the ultra-stable amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) from organic–inorganic halide perovskite MAPbI3 film with a low threshold of 12 µJ cm−2. The photostability of the MAPbI3 was assessed by monitoring the ASE intensity as a function of time under laser irradiation at room temperature. The ASE intensity was stable when the film was continuously irradiated for 26 hours. As a comparison, the typical ASE threshold of organic fluorescent dye-doped polymer films and CdSe/ZnCdS core/shell colloidal QD films were 30 µJ cm−2 and 90 µJ cm−2, respectively [14,58]. The low ASE threshold of MAPbI3 film was attributed to the low bulk defect density and slow Auger recombination of the film. Almost at the same time, the perovskite vertical-cavity lasing was achieved by embedding a layer of perovskite MAPbI3−xClx between a dielectric mirror and a gold mirror [59]. Seven months later, the perovskite RL in planar 2D MAPbBr3 thin film was reported on by Giebink’s group [60]. The laser feedback comes from the scattering within the MAPbBr3 perovskite microcrystal network. In 2015, random lasing in the monodisperse cesium lead halide perovskite CsPbX3 QDs was first observed [61]. Since then, perovskite RLs have been intensively studied and achieved in various nanostructures such as QDs, polycrystal thin films, and single crystals. The representative studies of RLs from halide perovskites are summarized in Table 1.
To date, the most studied perovskite RLs have been based on perovskite QDs and perovskite polycrystalline films. For perovskite QD RLs, multiple scattering media, such as nanoparticles, and wrinkled or nanoporous structures, are usually needed. The perovskite polycrystalline films can simultaneously serve as optical gain and multiple scattering media. The multiple scattering comes from the polycrystalline grain boundary and phase separation upon the phase transition.
In this review, we overview the recent developments and achievements of RLs based on perovskite nanomaterials. We first present the evolution of the perovskite QD and perovskite film RLs in detail and then discuss their frontier applications. Finally, the challenges of perovskite RLs for application are discussed, and the prospects for further development are proposed.

2. Perovskite QD RLs

In 2015, Kovalenko’s group reported on the ASE and lasing from the monodisperse all-inorganic perovskite CsPbX3 (X = Cl, Br, I) QDs for the first time [61]. The CsPbX3 QDs were synthesized by a one-step reaction between PbX2 and Cs-oleate in a nonpolar solvent. In this method, the PbX2 and ODE were first loaded into a flask and dried under a vacuum. Then the dried oleylamine and OA were injected under N2 protection. After the complete solubilization of PbX2 salt, the Cs-oleate solution was quickly injected. The reaction mixture was cooled 5 seconds later, obtaining the CsPbX3 QDs. Using these QDs as gain media, the authors observed the low-threshold ASE of 5–22 mJ/cm2 in the entire visible spectral range. The random lasing emission from CsPb(Br/Cl)3 QDs with narrow full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 0.14 nm was also obtained (Figure 1a–c). Later, Liu et al. studied the random lasing in self-assembled perovskite MAPbBr3 nanoparticles [62]. The MAPbBr3 QDs were synthesized by a one-step solution self-assembly method. Using a Ti:sapphire laser as a pump source, the single-photon and two-photon pumped RL with thresholds of 60 μJ/cm2, and 4.4 mJ/cm2 were realized. The near-field microscope image confirmed that the lasing actions come from the multiple scattering inside the perovskites. In 2016, Tang et al. prepared CsPbCl3, CsPbBr3, and CsPbI3 QDs with tunable emission from 400 to 700 nm and studied their lasing properties [94]. The authors believed that the light scattering was caused by the disorder arrangement of CsPbX3 QDs in the films.
The 2D materials with wrinkled structures have the advantages of stretchability and bendability. The wrinkled structure could trap the emitted light from the optical gain embedded in it. They are good scattering materials that can provide coherent optical feedback for the emitted light. In 2017, utilizing the reduced graphene oxide as wrinkled structures, Hu et al. designed a stretchable and wearable perovskite-based RL device [63]. In this device, the perovskite MAPbBr3 QDs, graphene film and polymer PDMS film were used as gain media, scatter and substrate, respectively. In the device fabrication process, a thin PDMS film was first stretched up to 100% of its original dimension. Next, the rGO films and MAPbBr3 QDs were spin-coated on the pre-strained PDMS substrate. Then the pre-strained PDMS was released to produce the wrinkled structure. Using a ps pulse laser as a pump source, the random lasing with threshold and FWHM of 10 µJ/cm2 and 0.4 nm were observed. This work provides a method to achieve flexible RL for wearable optoelectronic applications. Similarly, Roy et al. reported a perovskite RL by embedding MAPbBr3 QDs in the highly porous vertical-graphene nano-walls network [65]. The graphene networks could provide strong scattering and trap the photons effectively. The observed lasing showed an ultralow threshold of 10 nJ/cm2. Moreover, by coating Ag/SiO2 upon graphene networks, the threshold could be further lowered to 1 nJ/cm2. It is the lowest value reported so far. In 2019, Tang et al. distributed the CsPbBr3 QDs in solid honeycomb TiO2 nanotubes and successfully achieved room-temperature upconverted RL with a threshold of 9.54 mJ/cm2. The TiO2 nanotubes were used to enhance the optical multiple scattering effects [67].
In order to improve the stability of CsPbBr3 QDs, an accelerated transformation process from Cs4PbBr6 to defect-free CsPbBr3 QD was explored by Yang et al. [71]. In this work, the Cs4PbBr6 NCs were first synthesized by the hot injection method. Next, the deionized water was directly injected into a Cs4PbBr6 solution and irradiated under 365 nm light for 20 min. After being re-dispersed in toluene, the ultrahigh photo-and water-stable CsPbBr3 were obtained. It should be noted that the emission intensity could keep 92% after exposing them to 125 mL water for 45 days and could keep 93% when immersed in water and exposed to 365 nm illumination for 540 min. The observed lasing threshold was approximately 254 mJ/cm2, and the lasing could keep stable for more than 8.6 × 107 excitation cycles (Figure 1d–f).
The perovskite QDs possess high optical gain properties to produce room-temperature low-threshold lasers. However, they suffer from poor long-term stability due to their high sensitivity to UV irradiation, heat, water, and oxygen, which is a stumbling block to their practical applications [40]. The coating is regarded as an effective and facile way to solve this problem. In 2018, Yuan et al. developed an in situ nano-crystallization strategy to grow CsPbBr3 QDs directly into a more stabilized TeO2-based glass matrix for the first time [64]. In this method, the CsPbBr3 QDs@glass was designed with glass matrix compositions of TeO2-2Al2O3-14H3BO3-16ZnO-13Na2CO3 and perovskite components of Cs2CO3-PbBr2-KBr and CsBr-PbBr2. The precursor materials were first well mixed and ground into powders. After melting at 550–950 °C for 30 min and heating at 200–400 °C for 2–12 h, the QDs@glass was achieved. Those QDs showed superior photon, thermal, and water stabilities because of the effective protecting role of dense structural glass (Figure 2a–c). More importantly, those QDs distributed homogeneously inside the glass matrix, making them suitable to act as disorder gain media to realize RL. Under pumping by 800 nm fs laser, the RL emission with FWHM of 1nm and corresponding threshold of ∼200 μJ cm−2 was achieved at 77 K. This work presents a new route to fabricate perovskite QDs with excellent stability for lasing applications. Later, Liu et al. fabricated CsPbBr3 QDs embedded in microsized SiO2 (CsPbBr3-SiO2) spheres and realized a stable upconverted hybrid whispering-gallery-mode and random lasing in these spheres [66]. The RL threshold was approximately 65 μJ/cm2. The coherent feedback comes from the internal reflection between SiO2 and air. Li’s group proposed a Pb-S bonding approach to fabricate water-resistant CsPbBr3 QDs@silica nanodots [73]. These nanodots could keep emissions for six weeks when they were dispersed in water. Using these nanodots as gain media, the uncovering WG mode lasing and random lasing were also observed (Figure 2d–f). More importantly, the lasing emission could operate after the nanodots were dispersed in water for up to 15 days. In contrast to previous works, the RL showed great water stability. Jin et al. fabricated CsPbI3 QDs embedded into a glassy matrix through melt-quenching and glass crystallization methods [78]. The QD glass meets the requirements of oxygen, thermal, and water stability. After immersing the QD glass in water for one week, the PL intensity was maintained at 85%, and random lasing emission could still be achieved.
Wang et al. further synthesized a dual-phase mixed CsPbBr3 QDs@glass@styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene (SEBS) nanocomposite film [22]. To fabricate this film, the CsPbBr3 QDs@glass was first grounded entirely into micron-fine powders and mixed with the prepared SEBS-toluene solutions. After that, the mixed solution was tiled on a circular glass substrate, allowing the film to solidify. The nanocomposite film exhibited a high QY of ∼50%, outstanding UV/thermal/water resistance, and environmental friendliness. Upon pumping by an fs laser with a wavelength of 800 nm, the random upconverted laser was achieved. The RL from the surface ligand-modified CsPbBr3 QDs adhering on the surface of the micro SiO2 sphere was also reported [79].
Apart from the CsPbBr3 QDs, the FAPbBr3/SiO2 composites were also studied. In 2020, Yang et al. successfully synthesized the FAPbX3 QDs adhering to the surface of amino-mediated silica (A-SiO2) spheres using the ligand-assisted reprecipitation (LARP) method and studied the up-conversion random lasing [68]. The fabricated process is shown as follows. First, the FAX, PbBr2, A-SiO2 spheres, oleylamine, and oleic acid ligands were mixed in DMF, forming a precursor solution. Then, the precursor solution was injected into chloroform. Within seconds, bright green-emitting FAPbBr3/A-SiO2 composites were formed. The as-prepared FAPbBr3/A-SiO2 composites possess high photoluminescence with a QY of 80%. Using an 800nm fs laser as a pump source, the up-conversion RL with a low lasing threshold of 413.9 μJ/cm2 and high-quality factors of 1307 was achieved. Meng’s group developed a new approach to realize perovskite RLs by in situ precipitating perovskite QDs in metal−organic frameworks (MOFs) [75]. MOFs are a class of porous crystalline materials. The well-defined and interconnected nanoporous channels could effectively prevent the aggregation of gain media and serve as excellent scattering centers for RLs. In this work, Pb-MOFs, which acted as both the source of lead and the porous template, were utilized as a matrix. The high-density perovskite QDs were directly fabricated via the one-step process. The Pb2+ ions in Pb-MOFs provided sufficient binding sites, thus ensuring the generation of high-density gain in MOFs. Using this method, they fabricated MAPbBr3 QDs@Pb-MOFs, MAPbBrxCl3−x@Pb-MOFs, and MAPbBryI3−y@Pb-MOFs. The low-threshold multicolor RLs in the visible spectral range were achieved. Such RLs make full use of the merits of the MOFs of a high refractive index and a broad transmission window. Applying these RLs as an illumination source, speckle-free optical imaging was also demonstrated. Gao et al. proposed a flexible perovskite RL by depositing CsPbBr3 QDs onto Ni porous foam [77]. Ni porous foam has a 3D heat-conductive metallic structure of voids and provides strong light scattering between the voids. The laser emission could be tuned by controlling the surface morphologies of the Ni foam through deformation.
The most studied perovskites, such as CsPbBr3 and FAPbBr3, are composed of three-dimensional interconnected octahedral-structural units. For CsPbBr3 perovskites, the [PbBr6]4− octahedra units have three-dimensional interconnectivity, while Cs+ ions fill the voids between them. They typically suffer from severe PL quenching. In contrast to CsPbBr3, Cs4PbBr6 has the structure of the [PbBr6]4− octahedra being entirely separated, making the excitons strongly localized [95]. It gives rise to large exciton binding energy, which is beneficial to preventing the PL quenching in solid forms of Cs4PbBr6. In 2020, Liu et al. demonstrated the capability of perovskite Cs4PbBr6 monolith ceramics to trigger low-threshold single-/two-photon-pumped RL for the first time [70]. The perovskite Cs4PbBr6 monolith ceramics were fabricated by a high-temperature vapor-phase drop-casting approach. Briefly, the materials were first mixed and put into an alumina crucible. It was heated to 1200 °C for 20 min and then quickly drop cast and cooled. After that, the centimeter scales of Cs4PbBr6 monolith ceramics were obtained. The thresholds of single-photon-pumped and two-photon-pumped RL were ∼25.98 μJ/cm2 and ∼719 μJ/cm2, respectively. The lasing emission verified the green PL observed in the developed Cs4PbBr6 ceramics coming from intrinsic defects instead of CsPbBr3 contaminations. Plasmonic nanolasers provide an opportunity for expanding lasers in subwavelength applications. In 2021, Xing et al. reported a localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) supported CsPbBr3 QD random lasing from the Ag nanowire embedded CsPbBr3 QD films [76]. The observed lasing arises from the interactions between the QDs and Ag nanowires. When the pump light focused on a single Ag nanowire, the plasmonic-waveguide laser with a Q factor of 1300 was also observed.
Optical-pumping QD lasers are limited in practical application because of the high requirement for ultra-fast laser light sources. Electron beam (EB) pumping could partially solve this problem. Zhu et al. studied the CsPbBr3 RL using EB pumping [69]. In this work, the CsPbBr3 QD films were used as the gain media. The designed EB pumping laser device included an external trigger light source, Au cathode, microchannel plate, QD films, and TIO conductive glass. In this laser device, the initial photoelectrons from the Au photocathode were first triggered by a UV signal, and then the electron beam was amplified by a microchannel plate (MCP), obtaining the high-energy electron beam to pump the CsPbBr3 QD films. The voltage was applied to the microchannel plate and the ITO glass, forming an extra electric field (EF). When the voltage was strong enough, the low-energy particles could absorb sufficient energy to jump to high energy levels, resulting in massive photon emissions. At low voltage, the CsPbBr3 QD films showed spontaneous emission. When the external voltage exceeded 3 kV, a spike appeared in the emission spectrum. With further increased external voltage to 5 kV, sharp RL peaks appeared with an FWHM of 0.9 nm. The EB pumping method has the advantages of high efficiency and high stability. It provides a compact RL device for the integrated application.

3. Perovskite Film RLs

The random lasing from perovskite films was first reported by Dhanker in 2014 [60]. In this work, the planar 2D MAPbBr3 film was used as the gain medium. In the fabrication process, the precursor was first prepared by mixing MAI and PbI2 in a DMF solution. The solution was then spin-coated onto glass and annealed at 115 °C on a hot plate. After annealing, the MAPbBr3 film formed. The laser device was fabricated by encapsulating the film using a glass coverslip and an edge bead of ultraviolet-curable adhesive. Using an ns laser as a pump source, the authors observed bright RL spots with thresholds of 200 μJ/cm2. The linewidth of the laser peaks was less than 0.5 nm (Figure 3a–c). They proved that the RL originated from a combination of waveguiding and scattering within the perovskite microcrystal network. Soon after, Lu’s group studied the temperature-dependent lasing characteristic of solution-processed MAPbI3 films [96]. To fabricate this film, the authors first spin-coated the as-prepared PbI2 solution on a glass substrate and dried it at 70 °C for 15 min, obtaining yellow PbI2 film. Next, the PbI2 film was covered with an MAI solution and annealed at 100 °C for 2 h to form the dark-brown MAPbI3 perovskite layers of around 300 nm in thickness. The lasing emission from these films could sustain to a near room temperature at 260 K (Figure 3d–f). The multiple scattering comes from the polycrystalline grain boundary and/or phase separation upon the phase transition. Using a similar fabrication method, this group further demonstrated a controllable MAPbI3 perovskite RL with a low threshold [80]. In 2018, Safdar et al. fabricated uniform MAPbI3 films on glass by a simple solution deposition step and demonstrated a high-performance room-temperature RL [83]. The laser threshold was approximately 10 μJ/cm2.
The random lasing behavior of solution-processed perovskite films results from the random scattering in films. The substrate, morphology, and structural configuration of the films can affect their optical and especially the lasing performance. They can be controlled by manipulating the fabrication processing parameters, such as the ratios of pin-coating speed, engineered solvent mixtures, and substrate. Weng et al. compared the random lasing properties of MAPbBr3 perovskite films on different substrates [97]. The average thickness of the perovskite films was approximately 5 µm. The lasing threshold of the perovskite films on the patterned sapphire substrate was one order lower than on the fluorine-doped tin oxide substrate. The giant threshold reduction is attributed to the enhanced random scattering of light at the perovskite/sapphire interface. Hu et al. further prepared the MAPbBr3 multi-crystalline thin films on indium–tin oxide (ITO)-coated glass, fused silica (FS), and tricyclo decanedimethanol diacrylate (ADCP) substrates and studied the influence of substrates on the morphological and random lasing properties [93]. They found that the MAPbBr3 film on the FS substrate produced the thickest wrinkle-like stripes, whereas that on the ADCP substrate exhibited the thinnest modulation. The MAPbBr3 film on the ADCP substrate had larger crystal particles, implying stronger optical scattering. Hong et al. proposed an optimized anti-solvent dripping fabrication process. In this process, the GBL and DMSO were used as the solvent [88]. The thickness of the perovskite films was 100 nm. By tuning the volume ratios of solvent mixtures, the crystallization rate and structural morphology of grain boundaries could be controlled. Experiential results showed that the MAPbBr3 films exhibited the lowest lasing threshold and highest lasing intensity at the solvent volume ratio of 7:3 (Figure 4a–c). Moreover, the optimized lasing showed great long-time reliability with 12 × 105 pulses without any sealing package. Mallick et al. introduced a polystyrene passivation layer on MAPbBr3 perovskite films and studied the influence of polystyrene mixing concentrations on random lasing properties [89]. The passivation layer could improve the stability and reduce the non-radiative recombination of the MAPbBr3 film. The perovskite–polystyrene (30 wt.%) based RL showed the lowest lasing threshold and best contrast to noise ratio values in speckle-free imaging.
The multiphoton absorption process features merits of large penetration depth, little photodamage, and photobleaching. In 2018, Weng et al. synthesized a high-quality MAPbBr3 perovskite thin film through a one-step spin-coating method and demonstrated a three-photon (3P) pumped perovskite RL with fs laser pumping at 1300 nm [82]. The respective threshold was estimated to be 27 mJ/cm2. Despite the low conversion efficiency of the 3P absorption process, the 3P excitation was found to be effective in reducing the RL threshold. It was explained by the larger penetration depth and the more effective excitation of internal perovskite lattices for 3P absorption processes. Xu et al. studied the two-photon pumped random lasing from the FAPbX3 perovskite films [81]. In this work, FAPbBr3/polyethylene oxide (PEO) composited films with better moisture and temperature stability were fabricated by the solution processing method. The lasing threshold was approximately 1.1 mJ/cm2 when pumped by an ns pulse laser with an excitation wavelength of 1064 nm (Figure 4d–f). The lasing in the composite film was from the multiple scattering of light among the PEO bulks.
Compared with the hybrid organic–inorganic perovskites, the all-inorganic perovskites CsPbX3 have enhanced stability and outstanding electronic properties. However, the CsPbX3 perovskite films fabricated by the spin-coating method contain defects of pinholes and voids, which affects the lasing performance seriously. To solve this problem, Li et al. introduced ZnO nanoparticles into the CsPbBr3 films [98]. They first prepared a CsPbBr3:ZnO precursor solution containing CsBr, PbBr2, and ZnO nanoparticles in the N2 glovebox. They then spin-coated the precursor on the glass substrates by the one-step method. The chlorobenzene solvent was used as an anti-solvent to wash out the solvent DMSO to induce the perovskite fast crystallization. After annealing for 30 min, the CsPbBr3:ZnO films were fabricated. Using an fs laser system as the pumping source, the enhanced single-photon-pumped and two-photon-pumped ASE with thresholds of ~0.207 mJ/cm2 and ~0.569 mJ/cm2 were observed. The enhanced ASE came from the smaller crystal grains, the decoration of the ZnO, and a more compact surface. The perovskite films synthesized by the spin-coating method consisted of disordered nanoparticles and microparticles. Since no cavity boundaries were designed around these films, the laser emission was considered RL due to the disordered nature of the films. Duan et al. studied the miscellaneous lasing actions in MAPbBr3 perovskite films and proved that in addition to the random lasing, whispering-gallery-mode lasing could also generate in perovskite microparticles with their internal resonances instead of multiple scattering among them [99]. The miscellaneous lasing behaviors can help to understand the lasing actions in complex lead halide perovskite systems.
Consistent with the 2D perovskite materials are the inherent multiple quantum well (QW) structures. They have many advantages compared to 3D materials, such as quantum tunable optoelectronic properties and photo- and chemical stabilities. In 2020, Liang’s group fabricated a long-chain organic diammonium spacer-assisted 2D hybrid-perovskite FA-(N-MPDA)PbBr4 single-crystal microrods by the slow evaporation at constant temperature method [100]. The single-crystal microrods exhibited high crystallinity with a well-defined rod shape. Through pumping by a ps laser source, the high-quality RL with a threshold of 0.5 µJcm−2 and narrow lasing linewidth of 0.1 nm was observed. The Q factor reported here is 5350, which is the highest value in perovskite RLs. The low threshold and high Q factor are attributed to the long mean free path, strong quantum confinement, and the large exciton binding energy of 2D single-crystal perovskite microrods. The 3D MAPbBr3 single-crystal random lasing at a low temperature of 4K was also studied [101]. In the MAPbBr3 single-crystal, the random resonator is formed by the crystal cracks and inhomogeneities.
RLs do not rely on well-designed cavities and can be simply generated by the multiple scattering in the gain medium. The mode numbers, wavelengths, Q factors, and directionalities are random and hard to control, which hinders their practical applications. In 2019, Song’s group demonstrated a highly directional perovskite-based surface-emitting RL with lasing divergence angle <3–5° by combing the strong scattering perovskite film and planar microcavity [85]. In this work, the directionality of low-spatial-coherence RL was improved by DBR mirrors. The MAPbBr3 perovskite precursor solution was first spin-coated onto one of the mirrors. After annealing at a temperature of 80 °C for 10 min, the MAPbBr3 film was formed. Subsequently, another DBR mirror covered the perovskite film face to face, forming DBR−perovskite−DBR RL. The obtained surface-emitting RL thresholds and FWHM were approximately 25 μJ/cm2 and 1 nm, respectively. Using these directional RLs as light sources, the spectral-free imaging systems were shown. Bouteyre et al. designed an Ag/PMMA/MAPbBr3/Bragg mirror structure and realized a directional RL [90]. The thickness of the MAPbBr3 and PMMA films was 100 nm and 350 nm, respectively. The coupling of the lasing emission with the Bragg mirror guaranteed the tunable laser direction.
The toxicity of lead-based perovskites is a problem for their application. Some methods have been proposed to fabricate lead-free optoelectronic devices. In 2021, Wu et al. fabricated CsSnI3 films and demonstrated a CsSnI3 perovskite RL operated at room temperature in ambient air [91]. In this work, the CsSnI3 film was synthesized by the chemical vapor deposition method. The CsI and SnI2 powders were used as precursors. The laser threshold was approximately 18 mJ/cm2. The distinct cavity length at different detected directions was analyzed by employing the FFT method. Suárez et al. further fabricated high-quality FASnI3 lead-free perovskite thin films and demonstrated a low-threshold flexible RL [92]. The laser structure consists of a PMMA/FASnI3 bilayer structure deposited on a flexible PET substrate. The high quality of FASnI3 films and optimized design waveguide structure made the lasing threshold as low as 300 nJ/cm2.

4. Perovskite RL Applications

With outstanding performances, perovskite RLs have great potential in a wide range of applications, such as laser illumination, speckle-free imaging, display, and sensing. To date, some attempts have been conducted.
RLs are one class of innovative speckle-free intense light sources for advanced imaging apparatus because they combine the two advantages of high light output and low spatial coherence. In 2019, the perovskite RL for speckle-free imaging application was first reported by Wang et al. [84]. They fabricated a flexible perovskite RL by embedding curved MAPbBr3 perovskite thin film on the flexible polyimide substrate. They quantitatively analyzed the degree of spatial coherence and imaging capability of the MAPbBr3 perovskite RL. The results showed that the first-order spatial coherence of RL was less than 0.12, which was approximately one order lower than conventional Nd-YAG lasers. The image test further proved that perovskite RL was the ideal light source for high-quality speckle-free imaging (Figure 5a–c). Zhang et al. further demonstrated a miniaturized perovskite optical fiber RL for speckle-free imaging [86]. In this work, the MAPbBr3 perovskite films on the optical fiber’s end-face were first fabricated using the dip-coating method. The fabrication process included two steps. The optical fiber tip was first dipped into the PbBr2/DMF solution to obtain a layer of PbBr2 on the fiber facet. Afterward, the optical fiber tip was dipped into the MABr/isopropanol solution. After annealing at 70 °C for 20 min, the MAPbBr3 films on the optical fiber’s end-face were obtained. Using a 150-fs laser as a pump source, random lasing with a threshold of 32.3 μJ/cm2 was clearly observed. The divergence angle of the obtained laser beam was less than 60°. This directional RL is caused by the lower absorption in thinner films with small divergence angles and the refraction at the interface between the hemispherical perovskite film and air. The spatial coherence of the lasing was measured as γ = 0.6279, which was lower than that of traditional 532-nm continuous-wave (CW) lasers (γ = 0.9344). Moreover, the speckle contrast of RL was approximately 15 times lower than traditional lasers. In 2020, the perovskite RL was used for the holographic image projection by Mallick et al. [87]. They fabricated a perovskite–polystyrene 10 wt%-based RL using a solvent-engineered process. The polystyrene on perovskite films induced a low laser divergence angle of ≈100. Using this RL as a holographic image light source, the authors produced a significant speckle-free holographic image projection.
Perovskite materials are sensitive to environments such as water, oxygen, and temperature. Using these properties, Li et al. fabricated perovskite CsPbBr3 nanorods with an optical gain coefficient as high as 954 cm−1 and proposed a sensitive humidity sensing based on perovskite RL for the first time [72]. In contrast to LED and other incoherent luminescence, lasing is much more sensitive to the surrounding environmental conditions. The perovskite RL sensor could monitor the humidity from 30–72% RH. In 2021, Zhao’s group demonstrated full-color perovskite RL arrays for flexible laser display [74]. In this work, the CsPbX3 QD/SiO2 composites were used as gain media and multiple scattering structures to construct red, green, and blue-emissive micro RLs. The microlasers were precisely positioned into micro templates, forming RGB display pixels (Figure 5d–f). The flexibility and omnidirectional emission properties of RL enable the display device to maintain stable performance under deformation.
The perovskite RLs mentioned above are based on the optical-pumping source, which hinders their practical application. In most RL applications, electrical pumping is essential. Nevertheless, it has not been realized so far. The optical gain for perovskites requires the excitation of more than one. To achieve population inversion under electrical pumping, high electric current injection is needed. However, the high current will damage the laser device by Joule heating. Moreover, the multiple excitons undergo rapid non-radiative Auger recombination, prohibiting the sustained population inversion.

5. Conclusions and Outlook

In this work, we overview the recent developments of perovskite RLs. We start with the summary of the hybrid organic–inorganic perovskite QD and the all-inorganic perovskite QD-based RLs. We then discussed the perovskite film RLs. The perovskite nano-/microstructure fabrication process, the novel RL structure, and lasing properties are also discussed in detail. In the last part, we review the frontier applications of perovskite RLs in laser illumination, speckle-free imaging, laser display, and sensing.
Halide perovskite was proven to be in a class of high-performance gain materials due to its high performance in broadband absorption, single/multiphoton absorption coefficient, low non-radiative recombination, and tunable emission wavelength. In addition, High-quality perovskite QDs can be in situ fabricated in many matrixes, such as polymer film, glass, and MOFs. The perovskite films can also be fabricated by a simple one-step or two-step deposition process. The convenient solution-processability makes perovskite RL integrate on different substrates easily. Perovskite RLs have become a hot research field in the past few years. Significant advantages have been achieved. However, the solution-processed perovskite RLs are still in the initial stage toward practical applications. Some of the following challenges remain.
First, the biggest challenge for perovskite RL is the high threshold. The expensive fs lasers are used as pump sources in most previous works. To date, the CW laser pump or the electrically pumped perovskite RL has not been reported. Perovskites are potential gain media to achieve CW RL laser or electricity-driven RL. The perovskite Fabry–Pérot (FP) and distributed feedback (DFB) CW lasers using CsPbBr3 nanowires, MAPbI3 films, and MAPbX3/polymer composite films as gain media have been realized [48,49,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110]. With perovskite RLs, there are three factors influencing the CW laser threshold: the optical gain, the heat effect, and random cavity structure quality. The optical gain defines the ability of the gain media to achieve optical amplification. For solution process semiconductors, such as perovskites and II-VI QDs, the optical gain normally requires an average number of excitons greater than one. Perovskite materials show high gain absorption coefficients. The net gains of CsPbBr3 QDs and MAPbBr3 film were measured as 450 cm−1 and 3200 cm−1, respectively [111,112], which guaranteed the possibility of achieving CW RLs. It should be noted that the gain properties are dependent on the material temperature. High temperatures induce large non-radiative Auger recombination, which increases the lasing threshold. High-power laser injection, quantum defect, and non-radiative recombination generate substantial heat. Moreover, the strong multiple scattering in perovskite RLs produces more heat. The optical cavity quality is another important factor affecting the laser threshold. The optical feedback of RLs comes from the multiple scattering of the random media. However, the physical process in disordered systems is complex. To date, there has been a lack of specialized studies on the relationship between perovskite RL thresholds and cavity properties.
Second, the poor stability of perovskite RLs is another challenge. Perovskite materials are easy to degrade under conditions of irradiation, moisture, and oxygen. How to solve poor stability is a long-lived hot topic before their practical applications. One way is to develop new organic or inorganic ions for perovskites and control their morphology into low-dimensional structures. The coating is another effective way. Indeed, many matrixes, such as porous networks, TeO2/SiO2 glass, polymer films, and MOFs, have been pursued [22,64,66,67,68,75,79].
Third, the toxicity of Pb-based perovskites limits their real laser application. The solution is to develop Pb-free perovskites by substituting Pb with low-toxicity Sn, Ge, or other elements. The Pb-free CsSnI3, FASnI3 perovskite, and their RLs were reported. However, the optical property and stability of Sn/Ge-based perovskites are not as good as Pb-based perovskites. Much more work should be conducted to improve their performance.
Last, it remains a challenge to control the perovskite RL laser emission. Because of the lack of well-designed cavities, the lasing intensity, wavelength, mode number, and directionality are random and hard to control. It is harmful to their practical application, especially in the laser display field. Combing the scattering cavity with a conventional FP or DFB cavity is a solution. By taking advantage of the selection mode property of conventional cavities, it is possible to achieve high directional low spatial coherence RLs.

Author Contributions

L.W. and Y.L. collected the literature and prepared the figures and a draft. M.Y., S.Z. and C.N. assisted in editing and formatting the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The project was funded by the Qin Xin Talents Cultivation Program of Beijing Information Science and Technology University (QXTCP C202105) and Beijing Information Science and Technology University Funds (2021XJJ11, 2021XJJ09).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yu, S.F. Electrically Pumped Random Lasers. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2015, 48, 483001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wiersma, D.S. The Physics and Applications of Random Lasers. Nat. Phys. 2008, 4, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Luan, F.; Gu, B.; Gomes, A.S.L.; Yong, K.T.; Wen, S.; Prasad, P.N. Lasing in Nanocomposite Random Media. Nano Today 2015, 10, 168–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gomes, A.S.L.; Moura, A.L.; de Araújo, C.B.; Raposo, E.P. Recent Advances and Applications of Random Lasers and Random Fiber Lasers. Prog. Quant. Electron. 2021, 78, 100343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Azmi, A.N.; Wan Ismail, W.Z.; Abu Hassan, H.; Halim, M.M.; Zainal, N.; Muskens, O.L.; Wan Ahmad Kamil, W.M. Review of Open Cavity Random Lasers as Laser-Based Sensors. ACS Sens. 2022, 7, 914–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Song, Q.; Xu, Z.; Chio, S.H.; Sun, X.; Xiao, S.; Akkus, O.; Young, L.K. Detection of Nanoscale Structural Changes in Bone Using Random Lasers. Biomed. Opt. Express 2010, 1, 1401–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Liao, Y.M.; Liao, W.C.; Chang, S.W.; Hou, C.F.; Tai, C.T.; Su, C.Y.; Hsu, Y.T.; Wu, M.H.; Chou, R.J.; Lee, Y.H.; et al. Inkjet-Printed Random Lasers. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2018, 3, 1800214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pramanik, A.; Mondal, K.; Biswas, S.; Pal, S.K.; Ghosh, S.K.; Ganguly, T.; Kumbhakar, P. Sticky Note Paper-Based Plasmonic Random Laser for Artifact-Free Imaging. Appl. Phys. B 2022, 128, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ni, Y.; Wan, H.; Liang, W.; Zhang, S.; Xu, X.; Li, L.; Shao, Y.; Ruan, S.; Zhang, W. Random Lasing Carbon Dot Fibers for Multilevel Anti-Counterfeiting. Nanoscale 2021, 13, 16872–16878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lahoz, F.; Acebes, A.; González-Hernández, T.; de Armas-Rillo, S.; Soler-Carracedo, K.; Cuesto, G.; Mesa-Infante, V. Random Lasing in Brain Tissues. Org. Electron. 2019, 75, 105389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chang, S.W.; Liao, W.C.; Liao, Y.M.; Lin, H.I.; Lin, H.Y.; Lin, W.J.; Lin, S.Y.; Perumal, P.; Haider, G.; Tai, C.T.; et al. A White Random Laser. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 2720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Lawandy, N.M.; Balachandran, R.M.; Gomes, A.S.L.; Sauvaln, E. Laser Action in Strongly Scattering Media. Nature 1994, 368, 436–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cao, H.; Zhao, Y.G.; Ho, S.T.; Seelig, E.W.; Wang, Q.H.; Chang, R.P.H. Random Laser Action in Semiconductor Powder. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 82, 2278–2281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Ning, S.; Wu, Z.; Dong, H.; Ma, L.; Jiao, B.; Ding, L.; Ding, L.; Zhang, F. The Enhanced Random Lasing from Dye-Doped Polymer Films with Different-Sized Silver Nanoparticles. Org. Electron. 2016, 30, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ziegler, J.; Djiango, M.; Vidal, C.; Hrelescu, C.; Klar, T.A. Gold Nanostars for Random Lasing Enhancement. Opt. Express 2015, 23, 15152–15159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhu, J.L.; Li, W.H.; Sun, Y.; Lu, J.G.; Song, X.L.; Chen, C.Y.; Zhang, Z.; Su, Y. Random Laser Emission in A Sphere-Phase Liquid Crystal. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 191903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ismail, W.Z.W.; Vo, T.P.; Goldys, E.M.; Dawes, J.M. Plasmonic Enhancement of Rhodamine Dye Random Lasers. Laser Phys. 2015, 25, 085001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tolentino Dominguez, C.; Vieira, M.S.; Oliveira, R.M.; Ueda, M.; de Araújo, C.B.; Gomes, A.S.L. Three-Photon Excitation of An Upconversion Random Laser in ZnO-on-Si Nanostructured Films. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2014, 31, 1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fujiwara, H.; Niyuki, R.; Ishikawa, Y.; Koshizaki, N.; Tsuji, T.; Sasaki, K. Low-Threshold and Quasi-single-mode Random Laser within A Submicrometer-sized ZnO Spherical Particle Film. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 102, 061110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Wang, L.; Wang, M.; Yang, M.; Shi, L.J.; Deng, L.; Yang, H. Bichromatic Coherent Random Lasing from Dye-doped Polymer Stabilized Blue Phase Liquid Crystals Controlled by Pump Light Polarization. Chin. Phys. B 2016, 25, 094217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dai, G.; Wang, L.; Deng, L. Flexible Random Laser from Dye Doped Stretchable Polymer Film Containing Nematic Liquid Crystal. Opt. Mater. Express 2019, 10, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, Q.; Tong, Y.; Ye, H.; Liang, X.; Yang, K.; Xiang, W. Dual-Protective CsPbX3 Perovskite Nanocomposites with Improved Stability for Upconverted Lasing and Backlight Displays. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 11548–11555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hu, J.; Zhang, S.; Huang, S.; Zhang, J.; Lyu, M.; Lu, H.; Zhu, J. Ligand-Mediated CsPbBrxI3−x/SiO2 Quantum Dots for Red, Stable and Low-Threshold Amplify Spontaneous Emission. Nanotechnology 2022, 33, 285201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Dipold, J.; Magalhaes, E.S.; Bordon, C.D.S.; Kassab, L.R.P.; Wetter, N.U.; Digonnet, M.J.; Jiang, S. Emission Properties Study of a Nd3+-doped TZA Glass Random Laser. In Proceedings of the Optical Components and Materials XIX, San Francisco, CA, USA, 12 April 2022; p. 119970I. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wang, L.; Wan, Y.; Shi, L.; Zhong, H.; Deng, L. Electrically Controllable Plasmonic Enhanced Coherent Random Lasing from Dye-doped Nematic Liquid Crystals Containing Au Nanoparticles. Opt. Express 2016, 24, 17593–17602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhang, F.; Zhong, H.; Chen, C.; Wu, X.G.; Hu, X.; Huang, H.; Han, J.; Zou, B.; Dong, Y. Brightly Luminescent and Color-Tunable Colloidal CH3NH3PbX3 (X = Br, I, Cl) Quantum Dots: Potential Alternatives for Display Technology. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 4533–4542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zhao, X.; Liu, T.; Burlingame, Q.; Liu, T.; Holley, R.; Cheng, G.; Yao, N.; Gao, F.; Loo, Y. Accelerated Aging of All-Inorganic, Interface-Stabilized Perovskite Solar Cells. Science 2022, 377, 307–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Protesescu, L.; Yakunin, S.; Bodnarchuk, M.I.; Krieg, F.; Caputo, R.; Hendon, C.H.; Yang, R.X.; Walsh, A.; Kovalenko, M.V. Nanocrystals of Cesium Lead Halide Perovskites (X = Cl, Br, and I): Novel Optoelectronic Materials Showing Bright Emission with Wide Color Gamut. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 3692–3696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Dey, A.; Ye, J.; De, A.; Debroye, E.; Ha, S.K.; Bladt, E.; Kshirsagar, A.S.; Wang, Z.; Yin, J.; Wang, Y.; et al. State of the Art and Prospects for Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 10775–10981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Otero-Martinez, C.; Ye, J.; Sung, J.; Pastoriza-Santos, I.; Perez-Juste, J.; Xia, Z.; Rao, A.; Hoye, R.L.Z.; Polavarapu, L. Colloidal Metal-Halide Perovskite Nanoplatelets: Thickness-Controlled Synthesis, Properties, and Application in Light-Emitting Diodes. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2107105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Chang, S.; Bai, Z.; Zhong, H. In Situ Fabricated Perovskite Nanocrystals: A Revolution in Optical Materials. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2018, 6, 1800380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Veldhuis, S.A.; Boix, P.P.; Yantara, N.; Li, M.; Sum, T.C.; Mathews, N.; Mhaisalkar, S.G. Perovskite Materials for Light-Emitting Diodes and Lasers. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 6804–6834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wu, T.; Qin, Z.; Wang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Chen, W.; Zhang, S.; Cai, M.; Dai, S.; Zhang, J.; Liu, J.; et al. The Main Progress of Perovskite Solar Cells in 2020-2021. Nanomicro Lett. 2021, 13, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wu, X.; Ji, H.; Yan, X.; Zhong, H. Industry Outlook of Perovskite Quantum Dots for Display Applications. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2022, 17, 813–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. He, J.; Liu, Y.; Li, Z.; Ji, Z.; Yan, G.; Zhao, C.; Mai, W. Achieving Dual-Color Imaging by Dual-Band Perovskite Photodetectors Coupled with Algorithms. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 625, 297–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yang, G.; Fan, Q.; Chen, B.; Zhou, Q.; Zhong, H. Reprecipitation Synthesis of Luminescent CH3NH3PbBr3/NaNO3 Nanocomposites with Enhanced Stability. J. Mater. Chem. C 2016, 4, 11387–11391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yang, G.; Zhong, H. Organometal Halide Perovskite Quantum Dots: Synthesis, Optical properties, and Display applications. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2016, 27, 1124–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, X.; Li, J.; Zhang, P.; Lu, W.; Yang, G.; Zhong, H.; Zhao, Y. Perovskite Quantum Dot Microarrays: In Situ Fabrication via Direct Print Photopolymerization. Nano Res. 2022, 15, 7681–7687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, P.; Yang, G.; Li, F.; Shi, J.; Zhong, H. Direct in situ Photolithography of Perovskite Quantum Dots Based on Photocatalysis of Lead Bromide Complexes. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 6713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Wang, Y.; Zhao, H.; Piotrowski, M.; Han, X.; Ge, Z.; Dong, L.; Wang, C.; Pinisetty, S.K.; Balguri, P.K.; Bandela, A.K.; et al. Cesium Lead Iodide Perovskites: Optically Active Crystal Phase Stability to Surface Engineering. Micromachines 2022, 13, 1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Song, J.; Xiao, L.; Zeng, H.; Sun, H. All-Inorganic Colloidal Perovskite Quantum Dots: A New Class of Lasing Materials with Favorable Characteristics. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 7101–7108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, C.; Liu, Z.; Shang, Q.; Zhang, Q. Surface-Plasmon-Assisted Metal Halide Perovskite Small Lasers. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019, 7, 1900279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mi, Y.; Zhong, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, X. Continuous-Wave Pumped Perovskite Lasers. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019, 7, 1900544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, K.; Wang, S.; Xiao, S.; Song, Q. Recent Advances in Perovskite Micro- and Nanolasers. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2018, 6, 1800278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, Z.; Li, C.; Shang, Q.Y.; Zhao, L.Y.; Zhong, Y.G.; Gao, Y.; Du, W.N.; Mi, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhang, S.; et al. Research Progress of Low-Dimensional Metal Halide Perovskites for Lasing Applications. Chin. Phys. B 2018, 27, 114209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chen, J.; Du, W.; Shi, J.; Li, M.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, X. Perovskite Quantum Dot Lasers. InfoMat 2020, 2, 170–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Zhang, Q.; Su, R.; Du, W.; Liu, X.; Zhao, L.; Ha, S.T.; Xiong, Q. Advances in Small Perovskite-Based Lasers. Small Methods 2017, 1, 1700163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, L.; Meng, L.; Chen, L.; Huang, S.; Wu, X.; Dai, G.; Deng, L.; Han, J.; Zou, B.; Zhang, C.; et al. Ultralow-Threshold and Color-Tunable Continuous-Wave Lasing at Room-Temperature from In Situ Fabricated Perovskite Quantum Dots. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019, 10, 3248–3253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Wang, L.; Dai, G.; Deng, L.; Zhong, H. Progress in Semiconductor Quantum Dots-Based Continuous-Wave Laser. Sci. Chin. Mater. 2020, 63, 1382–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Huang, C.; Zhang, C.; Xiao, S.; Wang, Y.; Fan, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, N.; Qu, G.; Ji, H.; Han, J.; et al. Ultrafast Control of Vortex Microlasers. Science 2020, 367, 1018–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhao, W.; Qin, Z.; Zhang, C.; Wang, G.; Huang, X.; Li, B.; Dai, X.; Xiao, M. Optical Gain from Biexcitons in CsPbBr3 Nanocrystals Revealed by Two-dimensional Electronic Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019, 10, 1251–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Zhang, S.; Shang, Q.; Du, W.; Shi, J.; Wu, Z.; Mi, Y.; Chen, J.; Liu, F.; Li, Y.; Liu, M.; et al. Strong Exciton-Photon Coupling in Hybrid Inorganic-Organic Perovskite Micro/Nanowires. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2018, 6, 1701032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, Y.; Sun, H. Advances and Prospects of Lasers Developed from Colloidal Semiconductor Nanostructures. Prog. Quant. Electron. 2018, 60, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Pushkarev, A.; Korolev, V.; Markina, D.; Komissarenko, F.; Naujokaitis, A.; Drabavicius, A.; Pakstas, V.; Franckevicius, M.; Khubezhov, S.; Sannikov, D.; et al. A Few-Minute Synthesis of CsPbBr3 Nanolasers with a High Quality Factor by Spraying at Ambient Conditions. ACS Appl. Mater. Interface 2018, 11, 1040–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Nagamine, G.; Rocha, J.O.; Bonato, L.G.; Nogueira, A.F.; Zaharieva, Z.; Watt, A.A.R.; de Brito Cruz, C.H.; Padilha, L.A. Two-Photon Absorption and Two-Photon-Induced Gain in Perovskite Quantum Dots. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 3478–3484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mathies, F.; Brenner, P.; Hernandez-Sosa, G.; Howard, I.A.; Paetzold, U.W.; Lemmer, U. Inkjet-Printed Perovskite Distributed Feedback Lasers. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Xing, G.; Mathews, N.; Lim, S.S.; Yantara, N.; Liu, X.; Sabba, D.; Gratzel, M.; Mhaisalkar, S.; Sum, T.C. Low-Temperature Solution-Processed Wavelength-Tunable Perovskites for Lasing. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 476–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Dang, C.; Lee, J.; Breen, C.; Steckel, J.S.; Coe-Sullivan, S.; Nurmikko, A. Red, Green and Blue Lasing Enabled by Single-Exciton Gain in Colloidal Quantum Dot Films. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 7, 335–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Deschler, F.; Price, M.; Pathak, S.; Klintberg, L.E.; Jarausch, D.D.; Higler, R.; Huttner, S.; Leijtens, T.; Stranks, S.D.; Snaith, H.J.; et al. High Photoluminescence Efficiency and Optically Pumped Lasing in Solution-Processed Mixed Halide Perovskite Semiconductors. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 1421–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dhanker, R.; Brigeman, A.N.; Larsen, A.V.; Stewart, R.J.; Asbury, J.B.; Giebink, N.C. Random Lasing in Organo-Lead Halide Perovskite Microcrystal Networks. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105, 151112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yakunin, S.; Protesescu, L.; Krieg, F.; Bodnarchuk, M.I.; Nedelcu, G.; Humer, M.; De Luca, G.; Fiebig, M.; Heiss, W.; Kovalenko, M.V. Low-Threshold Amplified Spontaneous Emission and Lasing from Colloidal Nanocrystals of Caesium Lead Halide Perovskites. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Liu, S.; Sun, W.; Li, J.; Gu, Z.; Wang, K.; Xiao, S.; Song, Q. Random Lasing Actions in Self-Assembled Perovskite Nanoparticles. Opt. Eng. 2016, 55, 057102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Hu, H.W.; Haider, G.; Liao, Y.M.; Roy, P.K.; Ravindranath, R.; Chang, H.T.; Lu, C.H.; Tseng, C.Y.; Lin, T.Y.; Shih, W.H.; et al. Wrinkled 2D Materials: A Versatile Platform for Low-Threshold Stretchable Random Lasers. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1703549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Yuan, S.; Chen, D.; Li, X.; Zhong, J.; Xu, X. In Situ Crystallization Synthesis of CsPbBr3 Perovskite Quantum Dot-Embedded Glasses with Improved Stability for Solid-State Lighting and Random Upconverted Lasing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 18918–18926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Roy, P.K.; Haider, G.; Lin, H.I.; Liao, Y.M.; Lu, C.H.; Chen, K.H.; Chen, L.C.; Shih, W.H.; Liang, C.T.; Chen, Y.F. Multicolor Ultralow-Threshold Random Laser Assisted by Vertical-Graphene Network. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2018, 6, 1800382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Liu, Z.; Hu, Z.; Shi, T.; Du, J.; Yang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Tang, X.; Leng, Y. Stable and Enhanced Frequency Up-Converted Lasing from CsPbBr3 Quantum Dots Embedded in Silica Sphere. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 9459–9466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tang, X.; Bian, Y.; Liu, Z.; Du, J.; Li, M.; Hu, Z.; Yang, J.; Chen, W.; Sun, L. Room-Temperature Up-Conversion Random Lasing from CsPbBr3 Quantum Dots with TiO2 Nanotubes. Opt. Lett. 2019, 44, 4706–4709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yang, J.; Liu, Z.; Pi, M.; Lin, H.; Zeng, F.; Bian, Y.; Shi, T.; Du, J.; Leng, Y.; Tang, X. High Efficiency Up-Conversion Random Lasing from Formamidinium Lead Bromide/Amino-Mediated Silica Spheres Composites. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2020, 8, 2000290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhu, Y.; Mu, Y.; Tang, F.; Du, P.; Ren, H. A Corona Modulation Device Structure and Mechanism Based on Perovskite Quantum Dots Random Laser Pumped Using an Electron Beam. Front. Optoelectron. 2020, 13, 291–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Liu, Y.; Sun, X.; Gao, Z.; Hou, Y.; Wang, K.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Z.; Wang, X.; Xu, B.; Meng, X. Zero-Dimensional Perovskite Open Cavities for Low-Threshold Stimulated Emissions. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 25499–25508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yang, L.; Wang, T.; Min, Q.; Pi, C.; Li, F.; Yang, X.; Li, K.; Zhou, D.; Qiu, J.; Yu, X.; et al. Ultrahigh Photo-Stable All-Inorganic Perovskite Nanocrystals and Their Robust Random Lasing. Nanoscale Adv. 2020, 2, 888–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Li, R.; Yu, J.; Wang, S.; Shi, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wang, K.; Ni, Z.; Yang, X.; Wei, Z.; Chen, R. Surface Modification of All-Inorganic Halide Perovskite Nanorods by a Microscale Hydrophobic Zeolite for Stable and Sensitive Laser Humidity Sensing. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 13360–13367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Li, S.; Lei, D.; Ren, W.; Guo, X.; Wu, S.; Zhu, Y.; Rogach, A.L.; Chhowalla, M.; Jen, A.K. Water-Resistant Perovskite Nanodots Enable Robust Two-Photon Lasing in Aqueous Environment. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Hou, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Zhang, C.; Tang, J.; Fan, Y.; Xu, F.F.; Zhao, Y.S. Full-Color Flexible Laser Displays Based on Random Laser Arrays. Sci. Chin. Mater. 2021, 64, 2805–2812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Xu, B.; Gao, Z.; Yang, S.; Sun, H.; Song, L.; Li, Y.; Zhang, W.; Sun, X.; Wang, Z.; Wang, X.; et al. Multicolor Random Lasers Based on Perovskite Quantum Dots Embedded in Intrinsic Pb–MOFs. J. Phys. Chem. C 2021, 125, 25757–25764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Xing, D.; Lin, C.C.; Won, P.; Xiang, R.; Chen, T.P.; Kamal, A.S.A.; Lee, Y.C.; Ho, Y.L.; Maruyama, S.; Ko, S.H.; et al. Metallic Nanowire Coupled CsPbBr3 Quantum Dots Plasmonic Nanolaser. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2102375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gao, W.; Wang, T.; Xu, J.; Zeng, P.; Zhang, W.; Yao, Y.; Chen, C.; Li, M.; Yu, S.F. Robust and Flexible Random Lasers Using Perovskite Quantum Dots Coated Nickel Foam for Speckle-Free Laser Imaging. Small 2021, 17, 2103065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Jin, M.; Gao, W.; Liang, X.; Fang, Y.; Yu, S.; Wang, T.; Xiang, W. The Achievement of Red Upconversion Lasing for Highly Stable Perovskite Nanocrystal Glasses with The Assistance of Anion Modulation. Nano Res. 2021, 14, 2861–2866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Xiong, Q.; Huang, S.; Zhan, Z.; Du, J.; Tang, X.; Hu, Z.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, W.; Leng, Y. Surface Ligand Modified Cesium Lead Bromide/Silica Sphere Composites for Low-Threshold Upconversion Lasing. Photon. Res. 2022, 10, 628–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kao, T.S.; Chou, Y.H.; Hong, K.B.; Huang, J.F.; Chou, C.H.; Kuo, H.C.; Chen, F.C.; Lu, T.C. Controllable Lasing Performance in Solution-Processed Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Perovskites. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 18483–18488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Xu, L.; Meng, Y.; Xu, C.; Chen, P. Room Temperature Two-Photon-Pumped Random Lasers in FAPbBr3/Polyethylene Oxide (PEO) Composite Perovskite Thin Film. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 36910–36914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Weng, G.; Xue, J.; Tian, J.; Hu, X.; Bao, X.; Lin, H.; Chen, S.; Zhu, Z.; Chu, J. Picosecond Random Lasing Based on Three-Photon Absorption in Organometallic Halide CH3NH3PbBr3 Perovskite Thin Films. ACS Photon. 2018, 5, 2951–2959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Safdar, A.; Wang, Y.; Krauss, T.F. Random Lasing in Uniform Perovskite Thin Films. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Wang, Y.C.; Li, H.; Hong, Y.H.; Hong, K.B.; Chen, F.C.; Hsu, C.H.; Lee, R.K.; Conti, C.; Kao, T.S.; Lu, T.-C. Flexible Organometal–Halide Perovskite Lasers for Speckle Reduction in Imaging Projection. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 5421–5429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Liu, Y.; Yang, W.; Xiao, S.; Zhang, N.; Fan, Y.; Qu, G.; Song, Q. Surface-Emitting Perovskite Random Lasers for Speckle-Free Imaging. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 10653–10661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Zhang, X.; Yan, S.; Tong, J.; Shi, X.; Zhang, S.; Chen, C.; Xiao, Y.; Han, C.; Zhai, T. Perovskite Random Lasers on Fiber Facet. Nanophotonics 2020, 9, 935–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Mallick, S.P.; Sung, Z. Holographic Image Denoising using Random Laser Illumination. Ann. Phys. 2020, 532, 2000323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Hong, Y.H.; Kao, T.S. Room-Temperature Random Lasing of Metal-Halide Perovskites via Morphology-Controlled Synthesis. Nanoscale Adv. 2020, 2, 5833–5840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Mallick, S.P.; Hong, Y.H.; Chen, L.R.; Kao, T.S.; Lu, T.C. Effect of Passivation Layer on the Thin Film Perovskite Random Lasers. Materials 2020, 13, 2322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Bouteyre, P.; Son Nguyen, H.; Lauret, J.S.; Trippe-Allard, G.; Delport, G.; Ledee, F.; Diab, H.; Belarouci, A.; Seassal, C.; Garrot, D.; et al. Directing Random Lasing Emission using Cavity Exciton-Polaritons. Opt. Express 2020, 28, 39739–39749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Wu, Z.Y.; Chen, Y.Y.; Lin, L.J.; Hsu, H.C. Room-Temperature Near-Infrared Random Lasing with Tin-Based Perovskites Prepared by CVD Processing. J. Phys. Chem. C 2021, 125, 5180–5184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Suárez, I.; Chirvony, V.S.; Sánchez-Díaz, J.; Sánchez, R.S.; Mora-Seró, I.; Martínez-Pastor, J.P. Directional and Polarized Lasing Action on Pb-free FASnI3 Integrated in Flexible Optical Waveguides. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2022, 10, 2200458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Hu, J.; Zhang, X. Substrate Effects on the Random Lasing Performance of Solution-Processed Hybrid-Perovskite Multicrystal Film. Crystals 2022, 12, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Tang, X.; Hu, Z.; Chen, W.; Xing, X.; Zang, Z.; Hu, W.; Qiu, J.; Du, J.; Leng, Y.; Jiang, X.; et al. Room Temperature Single-Photon Emission and Lasing for All-Inorganic Colloidal Perovskite Quantum Dots. Nano Energy 2016, 28, 462–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Piotrowski, M.; Ge, Z.; Wang, Y.; Bandela, A.K.; Thumu, U. Programmable Precise Kinetic Control over Crystal Phase, Size, and Equilibrium in Spontaneous Metathesis Reaction for Cs-Pb-Br Nanostructure Patterns at Room Temperature. Nanoscale 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Kao, T.S.; Chou, Y.H.; Chou, C.H.; Chen, F.C.; Lu, T.C. Lasing Behaviors Upon Phase Transition in Solution-Processed Perovskite Thin Films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105, 231108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Weng, G.; Tian, J.; Chen, S.; Xue, J.; Yan, J.; Hu, X.; Chen, S.; Zhu, Z.; Chu, J. Giant Reduction of The Random Lasing Threshold in CH3NH3PbBr3 Perovskite Thin Films by Using a Patterned Sapphire Substrate. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 10636–10645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Li, C.; Zang, Z.; Han, C.; Hu, Z.; Tang, X.; Du, J.; Leng, Y.; Sun, K. Highly compact CsPbBr3 Perovskite Thin Films Decorated by ZnO Nanoparticles for Enhanced Random Lasing. Nano Energy 2017, 40, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Duan, Z.; Wang, S.; Yi, N.; Gu, Z.; Gao, Y.; Song, Q.; Xiao, S. Miscellaneous Lasing Actions in Organo-Lead Halide Perovskite Films. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 20711–20718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Roy, P.K.; Ulaganathan, R.K.; Raghavan, C.M.; Mhatre, S.M.; Lin, H.I.; Chen, W.L.; Chang, Y.M.; Rozhin, A.; Hsu, Y.T.; Chen, Y.F.; et al. Unprecedented Random Lasing in 2D Organolead Halide Single-Crystalline Perovskite Microrods. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 18269–18277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Murzin, A.O.; Stroganov, B.V.; Günnemann, C.; Hammouda, S.B.; Shurukhina, A.V.; Lozhkin, M.S.; Emeline, A.V.; Kapitonov, Y.V. Amplified Spontaneous Emission and Random Lasing in MAPbBr3 Halide Perovskite Single Crystals. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2020, 8, 2000690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Li, Z.; Moon, J.; Gharajeh, A.; Haroldson, R.; Hawkins, R.; Hu, W.; Zakhidov, A.A.; Gu, Q. Room-Temperature Continuous-Wave Operation of Organometal Halide Perovskite Lasers. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 10968–10976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Evans, T.J.S.; Schlaus, A.; Fu, Y.; Zhong, X.; Atallah, T.L.; Spencer, M.S.; Brus, L.E.; Jin, S.; Zhu, X.Y. Continuous-Wave Lasing in Cesium Lead Bromide Perovskite Nanowires. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2018, 6, 1700982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Jiang, L.; Liu, R.; Su, R.; Yu, Y.; Xu, H.; Wei, Y.; Zhou, Z.K.; Wang, X. Continuous Wave Pumped Single-Mode Nanolasers in Inorganic Perovskites with Robust Stability and High Quantum Yield. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 13565–13571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Brenner, P.; Bar-On, O.; Jakoby, M.; Allegro, I.; Richards, B.S.; Paetzold, U.W.; Howard, I.A.; Scheuer, J.; Lemmer, U. Continuous Wave Amplified Spontaneous Emission in Phase-Stable Lead Halide Perovskites. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Yang, Z.; Pelton, M.; Fedin, I.; Talapin, D.V.; Waks, E. A Room Temperature Continuous-Wave Nanolaser using Colloidal Quantum Wells. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Grim, J.Q.; Christodoulou, S.; Di Stasio, F.; Krahne, R.; Cingolani, R.; Manna, L.; Moreels, I. Continuous-Wave Biexciton Lasing at Room Temperature using Solution-Processed Quantum Wells. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 891–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Wu, K.; Park, Y.S.; Lim, J.; Klimov, V.I. Towards Zero-Threshold Optical Gain using Charged Semiconductor Quantum Dots. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2017, 12, 1140–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Fan, F.; Voznyy, O.; Sabatini, R.P.; Bicanic, K.T.; Adachi, M.M.; McBride, J.R.; Reid, K.R.; Park, Y.S.; Li, X.; Jain, A.; et al. Continuous-Wave Lasing in Colloidal Quantum Dot Solids Enabled by Facet-Selective Epitaxy. Nature 2017, 544, 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Jia, Y.; Kerner, R.A.; Grede, A.J.; Rand, B.P.; Giebink, N.C. Continuous-Wave Lasing in an Organic–Inorganic Lead Halide Perovskite Semiconductor. Nat. Photon. 2017, 11, 784–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Sutherland, B.R.; Hoogland, S.; Adachi, M.M.; Wong, C.T.; Sargent, E.H. Conformal organohalide perovskites enable lasing on spherical resonators. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 10947–10952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Sutherland, B.R.; Hoogland, S.; Adachi, M.M.; Kanjanaboos, P.; Wong, C.T.O.; McDowell, J.J.; Xu, J.; Voznyy, O.; Ning, Z.; Houtepen, A.J.; et al. Perovskite Thin Films via Atomic Layer Deposition. Adv. Mater 2015, 27, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) Colloidal CsPbX3 NCs. (b) Spectral tunability of ASE via compositional modulation. (c) Single pump laser shot mode structure of random lasing from CsPb(Br/Cl)3 QD film. The inset shows path–length distribution averaged over 256 pump laser shots. The images (ac) were adapted with permission from Ref. [61]. Copyright 2015 Springer Nature. (d) Schematic of CsPbBr3 NCs on a silicon substrate pumped via an 800 nm femtosecond laser. (e) Emission spectra of the CsPbBr3 NCs with different pump powers, showing the transition from spontaneous emission to lasing. (f) Integrated emission intensity as a function of pump density, showing the lasing threshold (254 mJ/cm2). Inset: Schematic diagram of the formation of a closed loop path for light through recurrent scattering in the samples. The images (df) were adapted with permission from Ref. [71]. Copyright 2020 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 1. (a) Colloidal CsPbX3 NCs. (b) Spectral tunability of ASE via compositional modulation. (c) Single pump laser shot mode structure of random lasing from CsPb(Br/Cl)3 QD film. The inset shows path–length distribution averaged over 256 pump laser shots. The images (ac) were adapted with permission from Ref. [61]. Copyright 2015 Springer Nature. (d) Schematic of CsPbBr3 NCs on a silicon substrate pumped via an 800 nm femtosecond laser. (e) Emission spectra of the CsPbBr3 NCs with different pump powers, showing the transition from spontaneous emission to lasing. (f) Integrated emission intensity as a function of pump density, showing the lasing threshold (254 mJ/cm2). Inset: Schematic diagram of the formation of a closed loop path for light through recurrent scattering in the samples. The images (df) were adapted with permission from Ref. [71]. Copyright 2020 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Micromachines 13 02040 g001
Figure 2. (a) Glass crystallization strategy to fabricate QD-embedded glass. (b) Photostability test of QDs@glass illuminated with 365 nm UV lamp: remnant PL intensity and the variation of FWHM as a function of the irradiation time. (c) Water resistance test by directly immersing QDs@glass in aqueous solution: remnant PL intensity vs. store time. The images (ac) were adapted with permission from Ref. [64]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society. (d) Schematics of the synthetic procedure for making water-resistant perovskite QDs@SiO2 nanodots. (e) Relative PLQYs of the laser devices were based on water-resistant perovskite QDs@SiO2 nanodots (red dots) and pristine QDs (black dots), which were immersed in water for different periods. The insets are photographs of the nanodot-based laser in water taken at different times under UV light illumination. (f) Emission spectra of the water-resistant perovskite QDs@SiO2 nanodot-based RL device stored in water for 15 days. The images (df) were adapted with permission from Ref. [73]. Copyright 2020 Springer Nature.
Figure 2. (a) Glass crystallization strategy to fabricate QD-embedded glass. (b) Photostability test of QDs@glass illuminated with 365 nm UV lamp: remnant PL intensity and the variation of FWHM as a function of the irradiation time. (c) Water resistance test by directly immersing QDs@glass in aqueous solution: remnant PL intensity vs. store time. The images (ac) were adapted with permission from Ref. [64]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society. (d) Schematics of the synthetic procedure for making water-resistant perovskite QDs@SiO2 nanodots. (e) Relative PLQYs of the laser devices were based on water-resistant perovskite QDs@SiO2 nanodots (red dots) and pristine QDs (black dots), which were immersed in water for different periods. The insets are photographs of the nanodot-based laser in water taken at different times under UV light illumination. (f) Emission spectra of the water-resistant perovskite QDs@SiO2 nanodot-based RL device stored in water for 15 days. The images (df) were adapted with permission from Ref. [73]. Copyright 2020 Springer Nature.
Micromachines 13 02040 g002
Figure 3. (a) Cross-sectional SEM image of the perovskite network. (b) Emission spectra are collected below, near, and above the lasing threshold. (c) Integrated emission intensity as a function of excitation pulse fluence. The lasing threshold is 195 ± 30 μJ/cm2/pulse. The images (ac) were adapted with permission from Ref. [60]. Copyright 2014 AIP Publishing LLC. (d) Schematic diagram of the perovskite MAPbI3 films prepared in solution processes. (e) PL emission spectra of the fabricated perovskite films, photo-excited at different optical-pumping powers. (f) L-L curve plotted on a log-linear scale and the corresponding linewidths as a function of pumping powers. The images (df) were adapted with permission from Ref. [96]. Copyright 2014 AIP Publishing LLC.
Figure 3. (a) Cross-sectional SEM image of the perovskite network. (b) Emission spectra are collected below, near, and above the lasing threshold. (c) Integrated emission intensity as a function of excitation pulse fluence. The lasing threshold is 195 ± 30 μJ/cm2/pulse. The images (ac) were adapted with permission from Ref. [60]. Copyright 2014 AIP Publishing LLC. (d) Schematic diagram of the perovskite MAPbI3 films prepared in solution processes. (e) PL emission spectra of the fabricated perovskite films, photo-excited at different optical-pumping powers. (f) L-L curve plotted on a log-linear scale and the corresponding linewidths as a function of pumping powers. The images (df) were adapted with permission from Ref. [96]. Copyright 2014 AIP Publishing LLC.
Micromachines 13 02040 g003
Figure 4. (a) Lasing characteristics of MAPbBr3 organic–inorganic metal-halide perovskites. (b) The light–light curves extracted from the films were synthesized at different volume ratios. (c) Lasing characteristics of solvent-engineered MAPbI3 perovskite thin films. The images (ac) were adapted with permission from Ref. [88]. Copyright 2020 The Royal Society of Chemistry. (d) The preparation of the PEDOT:PSS and the FAPbBr3/PEO layers. (e) Two-photon pumped random lasing spectra versus pumping intensity. (f) Two photon-pumped random lasing intensity and FWHM versus pumping intensity. The images (df) were adapted with permission from Ref. [81]. Copyright 2018 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 4. (a) Lasing characteristics of MAPbBr3 organic–inorganic metal-halide perovskites. (b) The light–light curves extracted from the films were synthesized at different volume ratios. (c) Lasing characteristics of solvent-engineered MAPbI3 perovskite thin films. The images (ac) were adapted with permission from Ref. [88]. Copyright 2020 The Royal Society of Chemistry. (d) The preparation of the PEDOT:PSS and the FAPbBr3/PEO layers. (e) Two-photon pumped random lasing spectra versus pumping intensity. (f) Two photon-pumped random lasing intensity and FWHM versus pumping intensity. The images (df) were adapted with permission from Ref. [81]. Copyright 2018 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Micromachines 13 02040 g004
Figure 5. (a) Schematic illustration of excitation and emission of a flexible perovskite film laser under bending conditions. Optical imaging of Air Force resolution test chart via (b) Nd:YAG laser and (c) perovskite RL from the flat substrate. The images (ac) adapted with permission from Ref. [84]; Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. (d) Design principle of the flexible laser display based on RLs. (e) Fluorescence microscopy images of the periodic RGB emissive arrays under UV light radiation. (f) Far-field photograph of the “ICCAS” patterns of pixel arrays comprising different microlasers. The images (de) were adapted with permission from Ref. [74]; Copyright 2021 Science China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Figure 5. (a) Schematic illustration of excitation and emission of a flexible perovskite film laser under bending conditions. Optical imaging of Air Force resolution test chart via (b) Nd:YAG laser and (c) perovskite RL from the flat substrate. The images (ac) adapted with permission from Ref. [84]; Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. (d) Design principle of the flexible laser display based on RLs. (e) Fluorescence microscopy images of the periodic RGB emissive arrays under UV light radiation. (f) Far-field photograph of the “ICCAS” patterns of pixel arrays comprising different microlasers. The images (de) were adapted with permission from Ref. [74]; Copyright 2021 Science China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Micromachines 13 02040 g005
Table 1. Selected representative results of RLs from halide perovskite gain media.
Table 1. Selected representative results of RLs from halide perovskite gain media.
AuthorsDescriptionPump Type Pump WavelengthEmission WavelengthThresholdsFWHMOperation ConditionPublication Date (Year)
Perovskite QD RLs
Yakunin et al. [61]CsPbBr3 QDsfs400 nm~483 nm~5 μJ/cm20.14 nmRT2015
Liu et al. [62]MAPbBr3 QDsfs400 nm/800 nm~548 nm60 μJ/cm2/4.4 mJ/cm21 nmRT2016
Hu et al. [63]MAPbBr3 QDsps374 nm540 nm~34.5 μJ/cm20.4 nmRT2017
Yuan et al. [64]CsPbBr3 QD-embedded glassfs800 nm530–540 nm200 μJ/cm2<1 nm77 K2018
Roy et al. [65]MAPbBr3 QDs/GNW compositeps374 nm530 nm1 nJ/cm20.4 nmRT2018
Liu et al. [66]CsPbBr3-SiO2 spherefs800 nm537 nm665 μJ/cm2<1 nmRT2019
Tang et al. [67]CsPbBr3 QDsfs800 nm540 nm9.54 mJ/cm20.49 nmRT2019
Yang et al. [68]FAPbBr3/A-SiO2 compositesfs800 nm~550 nm413.9 μJ/cm2~1307RT2020
Zhu et al. [69] CsPbBr3 QDselectron beam-~540 nm3kV0.9 nmRT2020
Liu et al. [70] Cs4PbBr6 monolith ceramicsfs400 nm/800 nm~541 nm25.98 μJ/cm2 719 μJ/cm2<1 nmRT2020
Yang et al. [71]CsPbBr3 QDsfs800 nm535 nm254 μJ/cm20.3 nm77 K2020
Li et al. [72]CsPbBr3 nanorodsfs355 nm532 nm18.8 μJ/cm20.2 nmRT2020
Li et al. [73]CsPbBr3 QD/SiO2 nanodotsfs800 nm533 nm0.91 mJ/cm20.3 nmRT2020
Hou et al. [74]CsPbX3 QD/SiO2 compositesfs400 nmRGB52.1–72.3 μJ/cm2-RT2021
Xu et al. [75]MAPbX3 QDs@Pb-MOFs ps490 nmMulticolar 520–780 nm0.38 mJ/cm21.2 nmRT2021
Wang et al. [22]CsPbX3@glass@ SEBSfs800 nm~523 nm0.16 mJ/cm2-RT2021
Xing et al. [76] Ag NW coupled CsPbBr3 QDs fs400 nm~520 nm~34.5 μJ/cm2~2.5 nmRT2021
Gao et al. [77]CsPbBr3 QDsfs800 nm537 nm190 μJ/cm21 nmRT2021
Jin et al. [78] CsPb(Br/I)3 QD glassesfs800 nm590 nm0.79 mJ/cm23 nm93 K2021
Xiong et al. [79]CsPbBr3 QD/SiO2 compositesfs800 nm527 nm79.81 μJ/cm20.4 nmRT2022
Perovskite film RLs
Dhanker et al. [60]MAPbI3 planar microcrystal networksns355 nm~785 nm200 μJ/cm2 <0.5 nmRT2014
Kao et al. [80]MAPbI3 filmns355 nm~745 nm~230 μJ/cm2-77 K2016
Xu et al. [81] FAPbBr3/PEOcomposite filmns1064 nm 538 nm1.1 mJ/cm20.4 nmRT2018
Weng et al. [82] MAPbBr3 filmfs1300 nm~547 nm27 mJ/cm25 nmRT2018
Safdar et al. [83]MAPbI3 filmsns532 nm780 nm10 μJ/cm25 nmRT2018
Wang et al. [84] MAPbBr3 filmns355 nm~546 nm2.5 mJ/cm21.8 nmRT2019
Liu et al. [85]MAPbBr3 filmps400 nm540–560 nm~25 μJ/cm2<1 nmRT2019
Zhang et al. [86] MAPbBr3 film on fiber facetfs400 nm552 nm32.3 μJ/cm24 nmRT2020
Mallick et al. [87] MAPbBr3 filmns355 nm~550 nm~6.6 mJ/cm2<1 nmRT2020
Hong et al. [88] MAPbBr3 filmsns355 nm~550 nm0.9 mJ cm2<1 nmRT2020
Mallick et al. [89] MAPbBr3 filmsns355 nm546 nm2.6 mJ/cm2~3 nmRT2020
Bouteyre et al. [90]MAPbBr3 filmfs405 nm545 nm104 μW0.7 nmRT2020
Wu et al. [91] γ-CsSnI3 filmsps355 nm950–960 nm18 mJ/cm20.3 nmRT2021
Suárez et al. [92]FASnI3 filmsns532 nm890 nm300 nJ/cm20.8 nmRT2022
Hu et al. [93]MAPbBr3 filmsfs400 nm~550 nm12.3 μJ/cm27.7 nmRT2022
Note. RT represents room temperature.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, L.; Yang, M.; Zhang, S.; Niu, C.; Lv, Y. Perovskite Random Lasers, Process and Prospects. Micromachines 2022, 13, 2040. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13122040

AMA Style

Wang L, Yang M, Zhang S, Niu C, Lv Y. Perovskite Random Lasers, Process and Prospects. Micromachines. 2022; 13(12):2040. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13122040

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Lei, Mingqing Yang, Shiyu Zhang, Chunhui Niu, and Yong Lv. 2022. "Perovskite Random Lasers, Process and Prospects" Micromachines 13, no. 12: 2040. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13122040

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop