Next Article in Journal
Design of a Four-Port Flexible UWB-MIMO Antenna with High Isolation for Wearable and IoT Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
GaN JBS Diode Device Performance Prediction Method Based on Neural Network
Previous Article in Journal
Broadband Circularly Polarized Conical Corrugated Horn Antenna Using a Dielectric Circular Polarizer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Buffer Traps Effect on GaN-on-Si High-Electron-Mobility Transistor at Different Substrate Voltages

1
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan
2
Institute of Lighting and Energy Photonics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan
3
Institute of Microengineering and Nanoelectronics, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
4
Semiconductor Research Center, Hon Hai Research Institute, Taipei 11492, Taiwan
5
International College of Semiconductor Technology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan
6
Institute of Electronics Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2022, 13(12), 2140; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13122140
Submission received: 20 October 2022 / Revised: 16 November 2022 / Accepted: 29 November 2022 / Published: 3 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue GaN-Based Semiconductor Devices, Volume II)

Abstract

:
Substrate voltage (VSUB) effects on GaN-on-Si high electron mobility transistors (HEMTs) power application performance with superlattice transition layer structure was investigated. The 2DEG conductivity and buffer stack charge redistribution can be affected by neutral/ionized donor and acceptor traps. As the donor/acceptor traps are excessively ionized or de-ionized by applying VSUB, the depletion region between the unintentionally doped (UID)/Carbon-doped (C-doped) GaN layer may exhibit a behavior similar to the p–n junction. An applied negative VSUB increases the concentration of both the ionized donor and acceptor traps, which increases the breakdown voltage (BV) by alleviating the non-uniform distribution of the vertical electric field. On the other hand, an applied positive VSUB causes the energy band bending flattener to refill the ionized traps and slightly improves the dynamic Ron degradation. Moreover, the amount of electrons injected into the buffer stack layer from the front side (2DEG channel/Ohmic contact) and the back side (AlN nucleation layer/superlattice transition layer) are asymmetric. Therefore, different VSUB can affect the conductivity of 2DEG through the field effect, buffer trapping effect, and charge redistribution, which can change the electrical performance of the device.

1. Introduction

In recent years, GaN-on-Si power HEMTs have gained tremendous interest due to their superior electrical characteristics, such as high breakdown voltage (BV), low on-resistance (Ron), and fast switching speed [1,2,3]. Compared to GaN-on-SiC and GaN-on-sapphire, GaN-on-Si is most suitable for commercialization owing to the low cost and the scalability to large wafer sizes [3]. The epitaxial structure of a lateral GaN-on-Si buffer stack from bottom to top is usually composed of an AlN nucleation layer, called a superlattice, or graded AlGaN transition layer, a carbon-doped (C-doped) GaN layer, and an unintentionally doped (UID) GaN channel layer [4]. However, GaN buffer stacks usually have plenty of dislocations, lattice defects, and bulk traps due to the lattice and thermal expansion coefficient mismatch between GaN and silicon [5]. The dynamic Ron of GaN-on-Si HEMT is related to the surface- and buffer-induced trapping. When the devices are switched from the off- to on-state, the hot electrons generated in the two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) channel are injected into the surface and buffer layers. When the surface and buffer traps cannot immediately release the trapping electrons, the 2DEG channel is partially depleted to increase the dynamic Ron [6].
The surface-induced trapping can be suppressed by the passivation and field plate. In contrast, the buffer-induced trapping caused by the compensated doping and crystalline defects is more challenging to address. During the epitaxial growth, the AlN nucleation layer is usually defective. It contains many donor-type impurities (e.g., Si, O), resulting in a lower effective energy barrier at the AlN/Si junction [7,8] for the enhanced charge injection to occur. Moreover, due to the energy barrier at the AlN–Si substrate interface, the electrons induced from the Si substrate may also be injected into the buffer with positive Vtop-to-sub (or negative VSUB) by trap-assisted tunneling, thermionic emission, and Poole–Frenkel emission [7,8,9].
For the GaN-on-Si HEMT, carbon doped (C-doped) is a common technique to reduce buffer conductivity, reduce current collapse, and increase BV during the epitaxial growth process [10]. The carbon atoms can substitute Ga or N sites, occupy interstitial positions in the nitride, and form chemical complexes with intrinsic defects [11,12,13]. A dominant deep-acceptor trap at EV +0.9 eV (generally considered to correspond to the CN state) and a shallow donor trap at EC −0.11 eV (more likely related to the CGa state) of the two main energy states are related to the carbon doping in the GaN buffer [10]. An appropriate ratio of acceptor trap and donor trap concentration may exist to achieve the optimum BV and buffer leakage current due to the vertical electric field modulation [14].
C-doped GaN layers could behave as p-type materials due to sufficient compensation doping and the Fermi level (EF) in the lower half of the bandgap [15]. UID GaN layers are observed to show light n-type conductivity owing to the existence of nitrogen vacancies [4]. The neutral, ionized donor, and acceptor traps can affect the 2DEG conductivity and buffer-stacks charge redistribution. The applied VSUB or VD at the UID/C-doped GaN interface may result in a behavior similar to the p–n junction [4]. The applied positive/negative VSUB causes different charging/discharging behaviors, which could be related to the non-uniform spatial distribution of dopant traps and the charge redistribution in the buffer stacks. The intrinsic trap time constants and the charge transport in the buffer stacks are both related to the response of donor/acceptor traps in the UID/C-doped GaN layers [15].
Recently, several studies discussed the impacts of VSUB on buffer-related performances, such as dynamic Ron [4,16] BV [17,18] vertical leakage current [19,20], gate charge change [21], and output capacitance [22]. However, most works were limited to the individual properties mentioned above. There are few reports [17,18] to investigate the overall device characteristics such as BV, on-state drain current, and dynamic Ron respective to VSUB for a GaN HEMT structure, thus, they are lacking unified models and discussions. Compared to these reports [17,18], which applied a VSUB of about ±60 V, we can apply a higher VSUB because the superlattice transition layer with a higher energy barrier can prevent electrons from injecting into the buffer stack layer at a high VSUB. In this study, we investigate the effects of a positive/negative VSUB on the above-mentioned device characteristics of the AlGaN/GaN HEMT having a superlattice transition layer. The impact of 2DEG conductivity and the charge trapping/de-trapping procedure are also investigated under the different VSUB and off-state VD.

2. Materials and Methods

The AlGaN/GaN heterostructures were grown on a 6-inch silicon substrate by metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD), as shown schematically in Figure 1. The AlGaN/GaN HEMT structure consists of an AlN nucleation layer, a superlattice transition layer, a C-doped GaN layer, a GaN channel layer, and 22 nm Al0.25Ga0.75N barrier layer. The mesa isolation was performed by BCl3 + Cl2 mixed gas plasma etching. To perform the Ohmic contact formation at source and drain, Ti/Al/Ni/Au was deposited by e-beam evaporation and was annealed by rapid temperature annealing (RTA) at 840 °C for 30 s in N2 ambient. The Ni/Au (50/300 nm) Schottky gate contact was deposited by the electron beam evaporation. Finally, 20 nm SiN was deposited as a passivation layer. The source-drain length, gate length, and gate width were maintained at 20, 3, and 25 μm, respectively. The buffer stacks can be considered insulated capacitors when the leakage current of each layer is smaller than the “displacement current”; i.e., IDISS = CTOTdVSUB/dt, CTOT is the series combination of the capacitances of UID GaN, C-doped GaN, and superlattice transition layer, respectively [15].

3. Results and Discussion

As shown in Figure 2, the buffer trap charging/discharging mechanism of HEMT devices with a superlattice transition layer is demonstrated schematically. The substrate of GaN-on-Si power HEMT can be used as an independent contact terminal for applying VSUB [23]. The VSUB can modulate the 2DEG concentration through the back-gate effect. Figure 2a shows that the buffer acceptor and donor traps are partly ionized and neutralized at the initial state. The un-ionized neutral donor/acceptor traps may exist in the UID/C-doped GaN layer. The opposite doping polarities may lead to the formation of the p–n junction at the UID/C-doped GaN interface [4,9,15].
Figure 2b shows that the electrons are injected from the Ohmic contact or 2DEG channel into the buffer layer when applying a positive VSUB [24,25]. The Ohmic contact provides the reservoir of free electrons that can be injected into the buffer layer when applying a positive VSUB. Without applying VSUB, the acceptor trap pulls down the EF in the buffer/transition layer so that the EF is below the acceptor trap level (ETA). Many acceptor traps are not ionized (charge-neutral) because the acceptor traps are deep. When the positive VSUB increases, the high vertical electric field induces electron trapping (ionization at the acceptor trap level) in the buffer layer of the acceptor trap [24,25]. Because a positive VSUB of 200 V is smaller than the traps-filled-limit voltage of donor traps (VTFL2), both with the positive VSUB and without the VSUB do not affect the concentration of the ionized donor trap.
Figure 2c shows that the concentration of both ionized acceptor and donor traps increases with the negative VSUB. In addition to the inherent barrier of the AlN/Si junction, the superlattice transition layer makes the electrons more difficult to be injected into the buffer layer in the off-state under the high VD. The top and bottom asymmetric vertical leakage and the fundamental difference between the carrier injection/transport mechanisms induced a different buffer layer trapping. The acceptor traps in the carbon-doped GaN are mostly ionized at a VSUB of −100 V, resulting in a net negative charge [4]. This net negative charge lifts the buffer energy band, increasing the energy barrier of the transition layer to a higher value, and injecting fewer electrons to the buffer layer [16]. The transition layer with a superlattice buffer structure can block the electron injections from the AlN/Si junction to the buffer layer. At off-state and high VD, the electrons from the Si substrate begin to overcome the energy barrier of the superlattice layer and inject into the buffer layer. When part of the buffer layer starts to conduct, the negative charge accumulates in the buffer layer, resulting in an increase in the buffer leakage current [15].
Figure 3 shows the energy band diagram when a different VSUB and low/high VD are applied. Figure 3a shows that without VSUB, the energy band has more bending as the VD increases. Figure 3b shows that at low VD, the applied positive VSUB causes the Si substrate to bend downward. The 2DEG channel tends to inject more electrons into the buffer stack, resulting in an entirely negative charge redistribution in the buffer layer and an increase in the concentration of the ionized acceptor trap. The positive VSUB can alleviate the energy band bending caused by applied high VD, and the electrons in the inversion layer formed at the Si substrate/AlN interface are less able to overcome the energy barrier of AlN and superlattice and inject into the buffer layer, avoiding the accumulation of negative charge in the buffer layer. Figure 3c shows that the negative VSUB can raise the energy band of the Si substrate even more and accumulate electrons in the inversion layer at the Si substrate/AlN interface at lower VD. After the electrons overcome the AlN energy barrier, the electrons are blocked by the superlattice layer and are not injected into the buffer layer. When the VD becomes larger, the bending of the energy band becomes more significant, which is equal to the applied drain voltage of |VD + VSUB| to the device. This causes the electrons accumulated in the Si substrate/AlN inversion layer to have higher energy to overcome the energy barrier of AlN and superlattice to inject into the buffer layer. This results in a significant amount of electrons injected into and accumulated in the C-doped GaN layer.
Table 1 and Figure 4 compare the overview of DC characteristics under the positive/negative VSUB. Applying the positive VSUB tends to induce more electrons in the 2DEG channel. However, the maximum drain current (ID) is almost constant because the ionized acceptor traps caused by injection electrons from the 2DEG channel or ohmic contact could clamp the increasing 2DEG concentration [4]. Under the positive VSUB, the DC characteristics are similar to the device without VSUB. A slightly reduced off-state ID is observed with a positive VSUB due to the leakage current flow from the drain to the buffer layer. Part of the electrons are also captured by the acceptor trap of the GaN carbon-doped layer, resulting in a slightly reduced total leakage current. Figure 2b shows that due to the applied positive VSUB, the electrons from the Ohmic contact at the interface of source and drain with GaN or 2DEG are injected into the buffer layer, where the acceptor trap of the GaN carbon-doped layer is ionized for the lower VD (12 V) case. An applied negative VSUB ideally reduces the maximum ID due to the simple electric field effect or capacitive coupling [15]. The ionization of acceptor traps in the buffer layers depletes the 2DEG channel; both can degrade the 2DEG conductivity. The Vth increases because the required gate voltage (VG) for turning on the depleted channel is increased. As Figure 2c shows, off-state applied negative VSUB causes the ionized donor trap concentration in the UID GaN layer to increase. An increase in ionized donor trap concentration indicates that positive charges have accumulated in the buffer layer. Hence, the positive charges neutralize part of the leakage current flowing into the buffer layer. Therefore, the total off-state ID decreases, and the on/off current ratio increases. The subthreshold swing (S.S) of this HEMT device is related to the ID magnitude when VG is smaller than the threshold voltage (Vth). As the off-state leakage current reduces due to the negative VSUB, a reduction in S.S is observed. The transconductance (gm) hike of this superlattice HEMT device with a negative VSUB applied is also observed. Firstly, the applied negative VSUB reduced the off current and increased the change in current per unit voltage, making the gm maximum larger. Secondly, when the negative VSUB is between −50 and −200 V, charge redistribution occurs in the GaN carbon doping layer. The higher maximum gm is related to the buffer stack charge redistribution due to the capacitance change of UID GaN, C-doped GaN, and superlattice transition layer [26].
Figure 5 shows the BV characteristics measured using off-state leakage current with the positive/negative VSUBFigure 5a,b show that the negative VSUB can increase the BV due to the increased ionized donor trap concentration. The BV was measured starting from VD = 0 V and gradually increased in voltage by 2 V/s. The electrons forming in the inversion layer between the Si substrate and AlN layer slowly accumulate energy to overcome the energy barriers to inject into the buffer stack. The electrons injected into the buffer layer have a sufficient reaction time to neutralize the ionized donor trap in the UID GaN with a positive charge. The ionized donor trap is more critical to BV than the ionized acceptor trap due to the alleviation of the non-uniform distribution of the high electric field caused by high VD [14]. Applying the negative VSUB (or positive Vtop-to-sub) causes the donor/acceptor traps to ionize at the UID/carbon-doped GaN interface [27]. An increase in ionized donor trap concentration with a moderate acceptor trap can increase the BV and reduces the off-state leakage current [14]. Therefore, the concentration of ionized donor trap and BV increase when a negative VSUB is applied. On the other hand, Figure 2a,b show that the electrons from the 2DEG channel or the Ohmic contact are primarily injected into the buffer layer to increase the ionized acceptor traps without decreasing the concentration of the ionized donor traps [15]. The BV at the applied positive VSUB and VSUB = 0 are very similar due to the same concentration of ionized donor traps.
The dynamic Ron characteristics for the HEMT devices with different Vsub were also measured. After each dynamic Ron measurement, the device’s initial state is fully recovered by shining microscopic light for 30 s, so that all trapped electrons were de-trapped [28]. Figure 6a shows that the device is switched to the on-state with a total switching time of 200 μs after 10 ms of high VD stress at off-state. As shown in Figure 6b, the positive VSUB slightly reduces the dynamic Ron, while the negative VSUB significantly increases the dynamic Ron. The dynamic Ron ratio for applying the positive VSUB is slightly lower than without VSUB (the off-state VD is from 100 to 300 V). As shown in Figure 3b, the positive VSUB can relax the energy band bending of the Si substrate/AlN junction caused by high VD, reducing the electrons that can overcome the energy barrier injected into the buffer layer.
Although an ionized acceptor trap in a C-doped layer may screen the electric field of a positive VSUB, applying a positive VSUB slightly increases the 2DEG conductivity by the field effect. Due to the electron injections into the buffer layer from the 2DEG channel and Ohmic contact, the ionization of the acceptor trap concentration in the C-doped GaN layer increases by applying a positive VSUB. The donor trap concentration is almost similar when applying a positive VSUB and without VSUB. The literature has reported that the ionization donor trap in UID GaN can alleviate the dynamic Ron degradation [9,14]. The ionization donor trap leads to a redistribution of the positive charge in the buffer stack. However, as shown in Figure 3c, the negative VSUB aggravates the Si substrate energy band bending, allowing the electrons to have higher energy to overcome the energy barriers between the AlN nucleation layer and superlattice transition layer injection into the buffer layer. The electrons injected into the buffer layer are not neutralized by the ionization donor trap (positive charge) in a short time. The 2DEG channel may be depleted, resulting in dynamic Ron degradation. Therefore, under the negative VSUB, the dynamic Ron degraded more seriously.

4. Conclusions

The effect of VSUB on the power application characteristics of GaN-on-Si high electron mobility transistors (HEMTs) with a superlattice transition layer, including breakdown voltage (BV) and dynamic on-resistance (Ron), was investigated. The negative VSUB increases the BV due to the increasing ionized donor-trap concentration. However, the positive VSUB and without VSUB do not affect the ionization donor-trap concentration, so both BVs are similar. The applied positive VSUB can relax the energy band bending of the Si substrate/AlN junction caused by the high vertical electric field. Therefore, the reducing electrons inject the buffer stack layer. The dynamic Ron ratio can be slightly reduced by applying a positive VSUB of 200 V at high off-state VD. Although the applied negative VSUB increases the ionized donor trap concentration, it also raises the Si substrate energy band. More electrons overcome the energy barrier and are injected into the buffer layer, causing the buffer trap to capture more electrons, and depleting the two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) channel, making the dynamic Ron degradation more serious. When applying the negative VSUB, S.S decreases, the on/off current ratio increases, and threshold voltage (Vth) shifts to positive due to the reduction in source-drain leakage current. When applying the positive VSUB, the DC performances of the devices, such as on/off current ratio, S.S, and Vth, remain almost the same as without an applied VSUB because both 2DEG conductivities remain nearly the same.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.L., M.-L.K. and C.-H.L.; Methodology, Y.L.; Validation, Y.L.; Formal analysis, Y.L.; Investigation, Y.L.; Resources, Y.-C.W. and E.-Y.C.; Data curation, Y.L.; Writing—original draft, Y.L.; Writing—review & editing, M.-L.K., C.-F.D., S.-C.C., H.-C.K., C.-H.L. and E.-Y.C.; Visualization, Y.L.; Supervision, E.-Y.C.; Project administration, Y.L.; Funding acquisition, E.-Y.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the “Center for the Semiconductor Technology Research” from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan. Also supported in part by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, under Grant No. NSTC-110-2622-8-A49-008-SB, NSTC-111-2622-8-A49-018-SB and NSTC-111-2634-F-A49-008 as well as National Chung-Shan Institute of Science and Technology NCSIST-404-V407(111).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Amano, H.; Baines, Y.; Beam, E.; Borga, M.; Bouchet, T.; Chalker, R.P.; Charles, M.; Chen, K.J.; Chowdhury, N.; Chu, R.; et al. The 2018 GaN power electronics roadmap. J. Phys. D 2018, 51, 163001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, J.K.; Häberlen, O.; Lidow, A.; Tsai, C.L.; Ueda, T.; Uemoto, Y.; Wu, Y. GaN-on-Si Power Technology: Devices and Applications. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2017, 64, 779–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhou, C.D.; Li, W.; Shen, J.; Chen, L.; Zhao, T.; Lin, K.; Zhang, M.; Chen, L.; Chiu, H.C.; Zhang, J.; et al. Reliability of 200 mm E-mode GaN-on-Si Power HEMTs. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS), Dallas, TX, USA, 28 April–30 May 2020. [Google Scholar]
  4. Yang, S.; Han, S.; Wei, J.; Sheng, K.; Chen, K.J. Impact of substrate bias polarity on buffer-related current collapse in AlGaN/GaN-on-Si power devices. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2017, 64, 5048–5056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Marchand, H.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, N.; Moran, B.; Coffie, R.; Mishra, U.K.; Speck, J.S.; DenBaars, S.P. Metal organic chemical vapor deposition of GaN on Si(111): Stress control and application to field-effect transistors. J. Appl. Phys. 2001, 89, 7846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yang, S.; Han, S.; Sheng, K.; Chen, K.J. Dynamic on-resistance in GaN power devices: Mechanisms, characterizations, and modeling. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron 2019, 7, 1425–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yang, S.; Jiang, Q.; Li, B.; Tang, Z.; Chen, K.J. GaN-to-Si vertical conduction mechanisms in AlGaN/GaN-on-Si lateral heterojunction FET structures. Phys. Status Solidi C 2014, 11, 949–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Moens, P.; Banerjee, A.; Uren, M.J.; Meneghini, M.; Karboyan, S.; Chatterjee, I.; Vanmeerbeek, P.; Cäsar, M.; Liu, C.; Salih, A.; et al. Impact of buffer leakage on intrinsic reliability of 650v AlGaN/GaN HEMTs. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), Washington, DC, USA, 7–9 December 2015. [Google Scholar]
  9. Miller, E.J.; Yu, E.T.; Waltereit, P.; Speck, J.S. Analysis of reverse-bias leakage current mechanisms in GaN grown by molecular beam epitaxy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 84, 535–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Zagni, N.; Chini, A.; Puglisi, F.M.; Pavan, P.; Verzellesi, G. On the modeling of the donor/acceptor compensation ratio in carbon-doped GaN to univocally reproduce breakdown voltage and current collapse in lateral GaN power HEMTs. Micromachines 2021, 12, 709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Matsubara, M.; Bellotti, E. A first-principles study of carbon-related energy levels in GaN. I. Complexes formed by substitutional interstitial carbons and gallium nitrogen vacancies. J. Appl. Phys. 2017, 121, 195701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Lyons, J.L.; Wickramaratne, D.; Walle, C.G.V.D. A first-principles understanding of point defects and impurities in GaN. J. Appl. Phys. 2021, 129, 111101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Remesh, N.; Mohan, N.; Raghavan, S.; Muralidharan, R.; Nath, D.N. Optimum carbon concentration in GaN-on-Silicon for breakdown enhancement in AlGaN/GaN HEMTs. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2020, 67, 2311–2317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Joshi, V.; Tiwari, S.P.; Shrivastava, M. Part I: Physical insight into carbon-doping-induced delayed avalanche action in GaN buffer in AlGaN/GaN HEMTs. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2019, 66, 561–569. [Google Scholar]
  15. Uren, J.M.; Karboyan, S.; Chatterjee, I.; Pooth, A.; Moens, P.; Banerjee, A.; Kuball, M. “Leaky Dielectric” Model for the Suppression of Dynamic RON in Carbon-Doped AlGaN/GaN HEMTs. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2017, 64, 2826–2834. [Google Scholar]
  16. Yang, W.; Yuan, J.S.; Krishnan, B.; Shea, P. Low-side GaN power device dynamic Ron characteristics under different substrate biases. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS), Monterey, CA, USA, 31 March–4 April 2021. [Google Scholar]
  17. Chiu, H.-C.; Peng, L.Y.; Yang, C.W.; Wang, H.C.; Hsin, Y.M.; Chyi, J.I. Analysis of the back-gate effect in normally off p-GaN gate high-electron mobility transistor. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2015, 62, 507–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mahaboob, I.; Yakimov, M.; Hogan, K.; Rocco, E.; Tozier, S.; Shahedipour-Sandvik, F. Dynamic control of AlGaN/GaN HEMT 18 characteristics by implementation of a p-GaN body-diode-based back-gate. IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. 2019, 7, 581–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Moench, S.; Müller, S.; Reiner, R.; Waltereit, P.; Czap, H.; Basler, M.; Hückelheim, J.; Kirste, L.; Kallfass, I.; Quay, R.; et al. Monolithic integrated AlGaN/GaN power converter topologies on high-voltage AlN/GaN superlattice buffer. Phys. Status Solidi 2020, 218, 2000404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. He, X.; Feng, Y.; Yang, X.; Wu, S.; Cai, Z.; Wei, J.; Shen, J.; Huang, H.; Liu, D.; Chen, Z.; et al. Step-graded AlGaN vs superlattice: Role of strain relief layer in dynamic on-resistance degradation. Appl. Phys. Express 2020, 15, 011001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, W.; Yuan, J.S. Experimental investigation of buffer traps physical mechanisms on the gate charge of GaN-on-Si devices under various substrate biases. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2020, 116, 083501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhuang, J.; Zulauf, G.; Rivas-Davila, J. Substrate bias effect on e-mode GaN-on-Si HEMT coss losses. In Proceedings of the IEEE 6th Workshop on Wide Bandgap Power Devices and Applications (WiPDA), Atlanta, GA, USA, 31 October–2 November 2018. [Google Scholar]
  23. Tang, G.; Wei, J.; Zhang, Z.; Tang, X.; Hua, M.; Wang, H.; Chen, K.J. Dynamic Ron of GaN-on-Si lateral power devices with a floating substrate termination. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2017, 38, 937–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhou, C.; Jiang, Q.; Huang, S.; Chen, J.K. Vertical Leakage/Breakdown Mechanisms in AlGaN/GaN-on-Si Devices. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2012, 33, 1132–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhou, C.; Jiang, Q.; Huang, S.; Chen, K.J. Vertical Leakage/Breakdown Mechanisms in AlGaN/GaN-on-Si Structures. In Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs (24th ISPSD), Bruges, Belgium, 3–7 June 2012. [Google Scholar]
  26. Chatterjee, I.; Uren, J.M.; Karboyan, S.; Pooth, A.; Moens, P.; Banerjee, A.; Kuball, M. Lateral charge transport in the carbon-doped buffer in AlGaN/GaN-on-Si HEMTs. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2017, 64, 977–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Zhang, H.; Kang, X.; Jin, Z.; Zheng, Y.; Wu, H.; Wei, K.; Liu, X.; Ye, T. Investigation on Dynamic Characteristics of AlGaN/GaN Lateral Schottky Barrier Diode. Micromachines 2021, 12, 1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Joh, J.; Alamo, J.A.D. A Current-Transient Methodology for Trap Analysis for GaN High Electron Mobility Transistors. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2011, 58, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic cross section of the GaN-on-Si device with superlattice buffer.
Figure 1. Schematic cross section of the GaN-on-Si device with superlattice buffer.
Micromachines 13 02140 g001
Figure 2. (a) Without VSUB: the traps charging/discharging in the buffer while applying the low or high drain voltage (VD). (b) With positive VSUB: the traps charging/discharging in the buffer while applying the low or high VD. (c) With negative VSUB: the traps charging/discharging in the buffer while applying the low or high VD.
Figure 2. (a) Without VSUB: the traps charging/discharging in the buffer while applying the low or high drain voltage (VD). (b) With positive VSUB: the traps charging/discharging in the buffer while applying the low or high VD. (c) With negative VSUB: the traps charging/discharging in the buffer while applying the low or high VD.
Micromachines 13 02140 g002
Figure 3. Band diagram with different VSUB and low/high VD condition. (a) Without VSUB, (b) with positive VSUB, (c) with negative VSUB.
Figure 3. Band diagram with different VSUB and low/high VD condition. (a) Without VSUB, (b) with positive VSUB, (c) with negative VSUB.
Micromachines 13 02140 g003
Figure 4. (a,b) ID-VG characteristics of the superlattice-based HEMT for different VSUB. (c) Comparisons of drain current (ID), on/off ratio, and subthreshold swing versus (S.S) different VSUB. (d) Comparison of Vth, Ron, and gm versus different VSUB.
Figure 4. (a,b) ID-VG characteristics of the superlattice-based HEMT for different VSUB. (c) Comparisons of drain current (ID), on/off ratio, and subthreshold swing versus (S.S) different VSUB. (d) Comparison of Vth, Ron, and gm versus different VSUB.
Micromachines 13 02140 g004
Figure 5. (a) Off-state drain leakage current of the GaN-on-Si HEMT as a function of substrate voltage in the log scale. (b) BV at different VD, off as a function of various VSUB.
Figure 5. (a) Off-state drain leakage current of the GaN-on-Si HEMT as a function of substrate voltage in the log scale. (b) BV at different VD, off as a function of various VSUB.
Micromachines 13 02140 g005
Figure 6. (a) Dynamic Ron transients of Drain/Gate voltage (VG) vs. time (μs) (b) Dynamic Ron/static Ron ratio at different off-state VD as a function of various VSUB.
Figure 6. (a) Dynamic Ron transients of Drain/Gate voltage (VG) vs. time (μs) (b) Dynamic Ron/static Ron ratio at different off-state VD as a function of various VSUB.
Micromachines 13 02140 g006
Table 1. DC characteristics of the GaN-on-Si HEMT with different substrate voltages.
Table 1. DC characteristics of the GaN-on-Si HEMT with different substrate voltages.
Substrate Voltage
(V)
On/Off ID RatioS.S
(mV/dec)
Vth
(V)
Ron
(Ω•mm)
gm
(mS/mm)
ID,max
(mA/mm)
Off-State ID
(mA/mm)
−2001.16 × 106155−9.599.4587.56085.24 × 10−4
−1004.79 × 105180−10.599.39826441.34 × 10−3
02.16 × 105202−11.769.2880.46963.22 × 10−3
1002.91 × 105203−11.89.2181.57022.41 × 10−3
2003.05 × 105201−11.789.1681.77012.3 × 10−3
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, Y.; Kao, M.-L.; Weng, Y.-C.; Dee, C.-F.; Chen, S.-C.; Kuo, H.-C.; Lin, C.-H.; Chang, E.-Y. Buffer Traps Effect on GaN-on-Si High-Electron-Mobility Transistor at Different Substrate Voltages. Micromachines 2022, 13, 2140. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13122140

AMA Style

Lin Y, Kao M-L, Weng Y-C, Dee C-F, Chen S-C, Kuo H-C, Lin C-H, Chang E-Y. Buffer Traps Effect on GaN-on-Si High-Electron-Mobility Transistor at Different Substrate Voltages. Micromachines. 2022; 13(12):2140. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13122140

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Yuan, Min-Lu Kao, You-Chen Weng, Chang-Fu Dee, Shih-Chen Chen, Hao-Chung Kuo, Chun-Hsiung Lin, and Edward-Yi Chang. 2022. "Buffer Traps Effect on GaN-on-Si High-Electron-Mobility Transistor at Different Substrate Voltages" Micromachines 13, no. 12: 2140. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13122140

APA Style

Lin, Y., Kao, M. -L., Weng, Y. -C., Dee, C. -F., Chen, S. -C., Kuo, H. -C., Lin, C. -H., & Chang, E. -Y. (2022). Buffer Traps Effect on GaN-on-Si High-Electron-Mobility Transistor at Different Substrate Voltages. Micromachines, 13(12), 2140. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13122140

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop