Next Article in Journal
Dynamic and Functional Alterations of Neuronal Networks In Vitro upon Physical Damage: A Proof of Concept
Next Article in Special Issue
Microfluidic Chip Fabrication of Fused Silica Using Microgrinding
Previous Article in Journal
Stainless Steel Foil-Based Label-Free Modular Thin-Film Electrochemical Detector for Solvent Identification
Previous Article in Special Issue
Rapid Customization and Manipulation Mechanism of Micro-Droplet Chip for 3D Cell Culture
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Terahertz Combined with Metamaterial Microfluidic Chip for Troponin Antigen Detection

Micromachines 2022, 13(12), 2257; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13122257
by Yen-Shuo Lin 1, Shih-Ting Huang 2, Shen-Fu Hsu 3, Kai-Yuan Tang 3, Ta-Jen Yen 4 and Da-Jeng Yao 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Micromachines 2022, 13(12), 2257; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13122257
Submission received: 11 November 2022 / Revised: 29 November 2022 / Accepted: 16 December 2022 / Published: 19 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nano- and Microfluidic Materials and Systems)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please find attached my comments

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

See attachment. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors demonstrate terahertz combined metamaterial technology for analytes identification at different concentrations. Overall, this work holds potential for molecule detection and bioanalysis. Some issues should be addressed before further consideration.

1.     Can the authors show the identification specificity?

2.     The authors use Ag-based substrate as the fluidic system, Ag substrate and many other metal noble substrates have already used for plasmonic-based molecular sensing and detection [Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 228 (2018), suggested to add], can the authors show the advantages of their work compared with plasmonic-based sensing and detection?

Author Response

See attachment. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have NOT responded to my previous comments adequately. And have NOT revised the manuscript according to the suggestion!

Back to TopTop