Next Article in Journal
Kinetic Walking Energy Harvester Design for a Wearable Bowden Cable-Actuated Exoskeleton Robot
Previous Article in Journal
A Thermal Actuated Bistable Structure for Generating On-Chip Shock Loads
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Editorial for the Topic on Microdevices for Biomedical Analysis

Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University 6-6-11, Aramaki-aza Aoba, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8579, Japan
Micromachines 2022, 13(4), 570; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13040570
Submission received: 30 March 2022 / Accepted: 1 April 2022 / Published: 3 April 2022
Recently, biomedical tools have been rapidly miniaturized due to the progress of micro-/nanofabrication technology based on bottom-up and top-down approaches. Due to miniaturization, the size and weight of biomedical tools has considerably decreased, leading to lower power consumption, higher portability, lower cost, higher precision, and quicker analysis. In addition to miniaturization, microdevices can exhibit special phenomena in micro-/nanospaces and/or micro-/nanostructures. For example, microfluidic devices can easily induce laminar flow, which is useful for biomedical applications, such as cell culture and bioanalysis. This editorial summarizes papers on microdevices for biomedical analysis published in 2020 in Micromachines.
Microdevices have been used for bioapplications of retinal tissues. Ha et al. [1] reported microelectrode array (MEA) devices for in vitro and ex vivo electrophysiological analyses using animal retinal tissues. In conventional devices, an MEA is prepared on a plane, leading to the deformation of hemispherical retinal tissues on the planar MEA. The deformation is unsuitable for these assays. In contrast, their devices consist of a hemispherical MEA, which allows retinal tissue to adhere closely to electrodes without tissue deformation. In this study, a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) layer with wavy Pt electrodes was stretched and placed on a hemispherical layer. The devices successfully recorded spontaneous neural activity from the retinas of mice without the deformation of the retina. The developed fabrication techniques will be applied to wearable sensors for health monitoring. Shire et al. [2] reported a high-density subretinal visual prosthesis, specifically, an implantable device consisting of a flexible electrode array and layer-by-layer fabrication schemes for multilayered electrode arrays.
Microdevices have been widely utilized in cell culture platforms for microphysiological systems, including organs on a chip. For example, skin models have been widely investigated because the physiological and immunological barriers of the skin prevent infection. Jahanshahi et al. [3] reported a skin model consisting of a multilayer epidermis on a hydrogel scaffold and a three-dimensional vascular-like network. To prepare for the vascular-like network, sacrificial Pluronic F127 inks were printed in a gelatin/transglutaminase solution. Compared with the monolayer of cells on gelatin, the electrical resistance of the cellular structure was dramatically enhanced. In addition, the model was used to investigate the inflammatory response of keratinocytes following an Escherichia coli infection. In this study, the expression levels of proinflammatory cytokines were measured. The authors reported that this model has great potential for drug testing.
Microdevices have also been used for the investigation of mechanical stimulation of cellular responses. Yadav et al. [4] reported the effects of mechanical stimulation on Rho protein markers (RhoA and Rac1) in liver cancer cells. The Rho family regulates intracellular actin dynamics. In this study, liver cancer cells were seeded onto a membrane that was placed and stretched using an electromagnetic actuation device. After stimulation, the cells were lysed, and the protein expression level was quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In this study, RhoA and Rac1 were overexpressed after stretching. The authors suggest that these markers can also be used as diagnostic biomarkers for liver cancer cells.
Cell-based biosensing has also been reported. Lee et al. [5] reported sensors for high-throughput assessment of bisphenol A (BPA) detoxification using micropillar/microwell chips. A droplet of alginate solution containing liver cells was placed on the micropillar of the chip. After alginate gelation, the micropillars were immersed in the microwell chip filled with culture medium containing analytes. The microdevice evaluated potential BPA detoxification using Korean pear extract. In this study, BPA toxicity was reduced by using Korean pear extract.
Luo et al. [6] developed an integrated microdevice for the continuous perfusion and temperature control in microenvironments for the culturing and monitoring of coral polyps. To mimic the marine ecological environment, a microwell-based microfluidic platform was fabricated and a low shear rate and high substance transfer were achieved. In this study, individual coral polyps were monitored during temperature changes. According to this study, coral polyps gradually lost their biological activity at high temperatures.
Microdevices have also been used for single-cell analyses. To prepare a platform for single-cell analysis, Yamahira et al. [7] reported a novel processing strategy for fabricating thin-bottomed round-well arrays with small dimensional errors. In this process, a mold of convex PDMS was pressed onto a polycarbonate sheet for deformation, resulting in a small dimensional error in the round-well arrays of the polycarbonate sheet over a large area without a precision mold. In this study, the platform was used for the polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) of single cells. The authors concluded that this is a promising strategy for facile, low-cost, and higher-precision microfabrication.
Microdevices are useful for point-of-care (PoC) devices, and they are utilized for the detection of chemical and biological analytes. Nguyen et al. [8] reported a summary of PoC devices for the rapid detection of coronavirus (COVID-19). This paper has been widely cited, over 260 times as of March 2022.
Finally, this editorial presents a bottom-up approach using DNAs for the fabrication of designed nanostructures. Liu et al. [9] reported a flexible DNA-ring motif with multiple joints. The shape of the DNA rings can be controlled by modulating the joints owing to the single-stranded nature of the DNAs. Additionally, the flexible DNA ring motifs can self-assemble into various structures. Although the novel motifs have not been applied to the fabrication of microdevices for biomedical analysis, they have great potential as biomedical tools based on bottom-up approaches.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ha, Y.; Yoo, H.-J.; Shin, S.; Jun, S.B. Hemispherical microelectrode array for ex vivo retinal neural recording. Micromachines 2020, 11, 538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Shire, D.B.; Gingerich, M.D.; Wong, P.I.; Skvarla, M.; Cogan, S.F.; Chen, J.; Wang, W.; Rizzo, J.F. Micro-fabrication of components for a high-density sub-retinal visual prosthesis. Micromachines 2020, 11, 944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jahanshahi, M.; Hamdi, D.; Godau, B.; Samiei, E.; Sanchez-Lafuente, C.L.; Neale, K.J.; Hadisi, Z.; Dabiri, S.M.H.; Pagan, E.; Christie, B.R.; et al. An engineered infected epidermis model for in vitro study of the skin’s pro-inflammatory response. Micromachines 2020, 11, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Yadav, S.; Kashaninejad, N.; Nguyen, N.-T. RhoA and Rac1 in liver cancer cells: Induction of overexpression using mechanical stimulation. Micromachines 2020, 11, 729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lee, D.W.; Lee, M.-Y.; Koh, S.; Yang, M. Micropillar/microwell chip assessment for detoxification of bisphenol A with Korean pear (pyrus pyrifolia). Micromachines 2020, 11, 922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Luo, Y.; Zhao, J.; He, C.; Lu, Z.; Lu, X. Miniaturized platform for individual coral polyps culture and monitoring. Micromachines 2020, 11, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Yamahira, S.; Heike, Y. Facile fabrication of thin-bottom round-well plates using the deformation of PDMS molds and their application for single-cell PCR. Micromachines 2020, 11, 748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Nguyen, T.; Duong Bang, D.; Wolff, A. 2019 Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): Paving the Road for Rapid Detection and Point-of-Care Diagnostics. Micromachines 2020, 11, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Liu, S.; Murata, S.; Kawamata, I. DNA ring motif with flexible joints. Micromachines 2020, 11, 987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ino, K. Editorial for the Topic on Microdevices for Biomedical Analysis. Micromachines 2022, 13, 570. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13040570

AMA Style

Ino K. Editorial for the Topic on Microdevices for Biomedical Analysis. Micromachines. 2022; 13(4):570. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13040570

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ino, Kosuke. 2022. "Editorial for the Topic on Microdevices for Biomedical Analysis" Micromachines 13, no. 4: 570. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13040570

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop