Next Article in Journal
Position Detection Method of Piezoelectric Driven Spherical Motor Based on Laser Detection
Next Article in Special Issue
High-Performance Flexible Piezoresistive Sensor Based on Ti3C2Tx MXene with a Honeycomb-like Structure for Human Activity Monitoring
Previous Article in Journal
A Review on Macroscopic and Microstructural Features of Metallic Coating Created by Pulsed Laser Material Deposition
Previous Article in Special Issue
Automatic Classification Framework of Tongue Feature Based on Convolutional Neural Networks
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Monolayer MoS2-Based Flexible and Highly Sensitive Pressure Sensor with Wide Sensing Range

1
School of Mechano-Electronic Engineering, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, China
2
CityU-Xidian Joint Laboratory of Micro/Nano-Manufacturing, Xi’an 710071, China
3
School of Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology, Xidian University, Xi’an 710171, China
4
School of Aerospace Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contribute equally to this work.
Micromachines 2022, 13(5), 660; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13050660
Submission received: 21 March 2022 / Revised: 17 April 2022 / Accepted: 20 April 2022 / Published: 22 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Flexible and Wearable Sensors)

Abstract

:
Flexible pressure sensors play an important role in flexible robotics, human-machine interaction (HMI), and human physiological information. However, most of the reported flexible pressure sensors suffer from a highly nonlinear response and a significant decrease in sensitivity at high pressures. Herein, we propose a flexible novel iontronic pressure sensor based on monolayer molybdenum disulfide (MoS2). Based on the unique structure and the excellent mechanical properties as well as the large intercalation capacitance of MoS2, the prepared sensor holds an ultra-high sensitivity (Smax = 89.75 kPa−1) and a wide sensing range (722.2 kPa). Further, the response time and relaxation time of the flexible sensor are only 3 ms, respectively, indicating that the device can respond to external pressure rapidly. In addition, it shows long-term cycling stability (over 5000 cycles with almost no degradation) at a high pressure of 138.9 kPa. Finally, it is demonstrated that the sensor can be used in physiological information monitoring and flexible robotics. It is anticipated that our prepared sensor provide a reliable approach to advance the theory and practicality of the flexible sensor electronics.

1. Introduction

Flexible pressure sensors are widely used in human-machine interaction (HMI) [1,2,3], electronic skin (E-Skin) [4,5,6], and human health monitoring [7,8,9,10,11]. In particular, capacitive pressure sensors have attracted a broad attention with their merits of low power, excellent stability and fast response time. But building flexible capacitive pressure sensors with high sensitivity and wide sensing range has been a challenge when considered the sensitivity of conventional capacitive pressure sensors is typically relatively low.
Iontronic pressure sensors have recently attracted a lot of attention [12,13,14,15,16,17]. This type of interfacial capacitive sensor based on electrical double layer (EDL) capacitance has the advantages of ultra-high capacitance (μF cm−2) and high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), which are not available with conventional flat plate capacitive sensor. The EDL performance depends on many items, among which the electrode materials play a most important role. Currently reported sensitive materials for preparing iontronic pressure sensor is categorized into metal-based electrode materials [18,19], carbon-based materials [7], metal oxide indium tin oxide (ITO) [20], and MXene [21]. Metal electrodes typically exhibit smaller specific surface area and reduced EDL capacitance. In the case of carbon materials, the electrodes are thicker, mechanically prone to fracture and have longer ion transport paths, while MXene faces problems such as oxidation. Therefore, the deep research on new materials for iontronic pressure sensor and the further study of their sensing mechanisms are important for the development of flexible iontronic sensors.
As a new two-dimensional material, molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) have attracted a lot of attention in recent years, and it has been widely used in supercapacitors, microelectronic devices, and batteries because of its rich elemental composition, wide band gap (1.29−1.90 eV), high electron mobility, excellent thermal properties and good mechanical properties [22,23,24]. Therefore the MoS2 has the potential to be used as an electrode material in iontronic pressure sensors. However, the study on the monolayer MoS2-based flexible iontronic pressure sensor are rarely reported.
Therefore, in order to solve the problem of sensitivity and sensing range balance of the flexible pressure sensor, we propose a novel iontronic pressure sensor based on MoS2 monolayer. The monolayer MoS2/gold composite electrode was obtained by wet transfer strategy. And the iontronic pressure sensor was assembled by the composite electrode and microstructural ionic film. Thanks to the excellent mechanical-electrical properties of MoS2 and unique layered structure, the prepared sensor shows an unprecedented ultra-high sensitivity (Smax = 89.75 kPa−1, Smin = 10.24 kPa−1) and a wide sensing range (722.2 kPa). The response time and relaxation time of the sensor sensor are both 3 ms, respectively. Moreover, the possible sensing mechanism of the sensor is proposed. Finally, the application of this novel iontronic pressure sensor is carefully demonstrated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of MoS2/Au Composite Electrode

The Au/PI (polyimide) was prepared by magnetron sputtering. A thin 100 nm gold layer was sputtered on the cleaned PI film. A monolayer MoS2 grew on the Si/SiO2 (Silion/Silicon dioxide) wafer (SiO2 layer thickness, 300 nm) by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method. A PMMA (polymethyl methacrylate) film was covered on the MoS2 layer as a supporting protective layer by spin-coating method (3000 r min−1, 10 s), and dried completely at 100 °C for 10 min. Then, the samples were placed in a KOH (potassium hydroxide) solution (1 mol L−1) with a heating temperature of 90 °C to etch the growth substrate to separate the PMMA/MoS2 from the Si/SiO2 substrate. After the sample was completely separated from the substrate, PMMA/MoS2 was transferred to deionized water and soaked several times to remove the residue KOH solution, and then PMMA/MoS2 was transferred to the Au/PI electrode. Finally, the PMMA film was removed using acetone, and the electrode was cleaned with isopropyl alcohol and deionized water several times to remove the residual acetone.

2.2. Preparation of PVA/H3PO4 Film with Pyramid Microstructure

1 g of Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA) was mixed with deionized water (10 mL) under serious stirring at 85 °C for one hour until completely dissolved to a transparent state. Then the 85% H3PO4 solution (2 mL) was added to the prepared PVA solution drop by drop, and then stirring continued for half an hour at 90 °C to make the uniform dispersion. Finally, the prepared gel electrolyte was evenly coated on the mask template with pyramidal microstructure and the thickness was controlled at 100 μm by spin coating. After the film was dried at 60 °C for one hour, the film can be peeled off from the substrate.

2.3. Fabrication of Flexible Pressure Sensor

The prepared gold electrode with a monolayer MoS2 on PI substrate, the poly (ethylene terephthalate) PET spacer layer, the PVA/H3PO4 ionic film with upside-down pyramid microstructure are stacked in a “sandwich” configuration PET with a thickness of about 100 μm was employed as the spacer, and finally 3M tape was used to ensure the fully integrated encapsulation of the device.

2.4. Material and Structural Characterization

Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, Quanta 450, 20 kV) were used to characterize the structure and morphology information. Raman spectroscopy were measured by a Renishaw inVia Raman spectrometer (Renishaw, Britain, UK). For each test on MoS2, three samples were prepared and five points on each sample were measured.

2.5. Electrical and Mechanical Characterization

For the electromechanical characterization, the variable capacitance can be recorded by LCR impedance analyzer (Tonghui, TH 2827A, Changzhou, China) and IM3536 LCR meter (HIOKI, Taiwan, China) linkage test. The CV curves also were shown on the electrochemical working station (CHI 760E, Chen Hua, Shanghai, China) under the applied pressure. For featuring cyclic stability, the device was tested on a mechanical testing machine (Zhi Qu, 990B, Dongguan, China) with the pulling speed of 5 mm min−1.

3. Results and Discussion

MoS2 possess excellent intercalating pseudocapacitive and EDL properties for charge storage. And it has been shown that MoS2 has faster electron transfer capability than oxide and higher theoretical specific capacitance than graphene when used as an electrode material. Therefore, in this study, a monolayer MoS2 is introduced as the electrode to improve the capacitance and further boost the sensitivity of the sensor. The monolayer MoS2 was transferred by wet transfer method (Figure 1) on an Au/PI film. The assembled device is shown in Figure 1b. The size of the prepared sensor is 1 × 1 cm2, which is small compared with a coin, demonstrating its portable and flexible feature. Noted that the microstructural ionic film was beneficial to further improve the sensitivity of the sensor, which has been demonstrated by previous reports [25].
The monolayer MoS2 was transferred onto the Au/PI electrode by wet transfer method [26], and the optical microscope of the electrode is shown in Figure 2a. From which it can be observed that the large and continuous monolayer MoS2 on the Au/PI film showed good integrity and only a very few cracks existed due to etching when the support layer was removed during the transfer process. The Raman results further certified the MoS2 property. The number of layers of the sample can be determined according to the wave number difference between E12g and A1g.from Raman spectra of monolayer MoS2. Wave number difference of bulk material is 26 cm−1, while the wave number difference between A1g and E12g in Figure 2b is 19 cm−1. Hence, the preparative sample of MoS2 can be regarded as monolayer with the thickness of 6.15 Å [27,28]. Further, SEM of the monolayer MoS2 before and after the transfer was performed in Figure 2c,d. It can be observed that the monolayer MoS2 on the Si/SiO2 substrate is large area continuous growth without clear defect. Also, as shown in Figure 2d, the monolayer MoS2 can still be observed as a continuous boundary which is similar to that before transfer to the target substrate by the wet transfer method. This further indicates that the monolayer MoS2 obtained by the wet transfer method has a high integrity with few significant cracks, which lays the foundation for the preparation of the sensor electrode. Finally, SEM of the monolayer MoS2 after 5000 cycle test was performed in Figure 2e,f.
The digital optical image of the ionic membrane is shown in Figure 3a, which exhibits excellent flexibility. The microstructure of the inverted pyramid is clearly visible (Figure 3b). The prepared PVA/H3PO4 ionic membrane was further characterized by SEM, as shown in Figure 3c. It can be clearly seen that the microstructure of the prepared ionic membrane is well established, exhibiting an inverted pyramidal structure with each size of about 100 μm. The cross-sectional structure of the ionic membrane is shown in Figure 3d, which shows that the membrane has a distinct pyramidal protrusion structure with a height of about 70 μm. The microstructure has been demonstrated to significantly improve the sensitivity of the flexible sensor. When the microstructure is compressed, due to the initial mechanically non-stationary state, it is easy to deform thus causing a rapid increase in the contact area between the electrode and the ionic membrane, thus increasing the capacitance and sensitivity of the sensor.
The performance of the sensor is investigated as shown in Figure 4. The maximum sensitivity (Smax) of the MoS2-based iontronic pressure sensor is 89.75 kPa−1 up to 55.6 kPa, and the minimum sensitivity(Smin) is 10.24 kPa−1 in the range of 55.6 kPa to 722.2 kPa, which is superior to our previous work and other works [29,30,31,32,33,34]. Also, an iontronic pressure sensor with the same structure but without the MoS2 layer was prepared as a control group. The results showed that its sensitivity was 0.031 kPa−1, which demonstrated the important role of the MoS2 layer. The increased capacitance is derived from the unique layer structure, huge specific surface area and pseudocapacitance characteristics.
The stability of the sensor subject to the same pressure is also one of the important factors. The sensor was tested under four different continuously pressure of 27.8 kPa, 138.9 kPa, 555.6 kPa, and 722.2 kPa respectively, as shown in Figure 4b. The signal of the sensor is constant for each test, and can be rapidly recovered after the force is removed. The stable and proportional electrical signal output at different pressures indicates that the sensor can maintain high stability with small signal drift. To evaluate the dynamic response speed of the pressure sensor, a weight of 1 g (equivalent pressure ~0.01 N) was gently placed on the pressure sensor followed by a quick release revealing a 3 ms response time and relaxation time in Figure 4c. This indicates that the prepared sensor can respond quickly to the applied external stimulus and has a good dynamic response. Even after continuous pressure of 138.9 kPa for 5000 cycles, as shown in Figure 4d, the sensor still maintained a stable signal output with no significant attenuation, demonstrating its long-term use application. Small cracks were found on the surface of monolayer MoS2 but they did not affect final signal response in Figure 4d.
Also, the sensor was further tested at different frequencies (0.1, 0.2 and 1 Hz) at the same pressure (138.9 kPa). As shown in Figure 5a, the sensor maintained a stable signal at various frequency, demonstrating that the sensor’s excellent dynamic response. Importantly, the CV curve of the sensor under 722.2 kPa was investigated to find the deep sensing mechanism. As shown in Figure 5b, the CV curve is not ideally rectangular, and shows a small peak in redox, which is further evidence of the pseudo-capacitance effect as described above.
Based on the above, the superior performance of the sensor has been demonstrated and its sensing mechanism was revealed as shown in Figure 6. In this study, in addition to improving the sensitivity by MoS2 layer, a spacer layer is also introduced between the ionic film and the electrode (Figure 6a). Initially, the capacitance is extremely small due to the presence of the spacer layer. When the sensor is subjected to pressure, the upper electrodes layer was bent due to stress and the distance between the two electrodes becomes narrow, resulting in a larger capacitance (CPE, Figure 6b). Further, when the force continues to be applied, the electrodes began contact with the ionic membrane (CEDL1), causing a rapid increase in EDL capacitance. With further increase in force, the contact area between the microstructure of the ionic membrane and the lower electrode further increases and the capacitance further becomes larger (CEDL2), leading to higher capacitance changes. In addition, it is obvious from the simulation that the deformation of the microstructure is mainly concentrated in the middle part of the microstructure rather than the tip of the structure, which may be due to the unique shape of the microstructure. It is also confirmed that the microstructure can improve the capacitance of the sensor.
To investigate the application of the iontronic pressure sensor, the sensor was mounted on the human body to detect the movement. As shown in Figure 7a, with the rapid change of the finger to a small angle, the signal output of the sensor is consistent each time, indicating that the sensor can accurately recognize the bending of the finger. Subsequently, with a rapid change of the finger to a large angle (about 90°), the signal output amplitude increases significantly compared to the previous small angle change, suggesting that the sensor can accurately recognize different angle changes of the finger. In addition to the finger, the sensor can also detect wrist and arm bending as well as eye blinking (Figure 7b−d). These above demonstrated that the sensor has the ability to detect human motion and has important applications in the health rehabilitation of the human body. To simulate the scene of gas leak monitoring, an aurilave was used to imitate airflow. Under subtle signals, the sensor response was captured. Figure 7e has shown the variation of capacitance over time, which demonstrated that stable output can also be achieved for subtle signals. As summarized in Figure 7f [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43], our Monolayer MoS2-based iontronic pressure sensor shows an incomparably high sensitivity and an ultrabroad work range of pressure, out-performing existing capacitance pressure sensor.
Further, we directly mounted the flexible sensor on the flexible manipulator and use the manipulator to grasp objects of different weights. In this study, pears and apples of different weights but similar shapes for comparison. As shown in Figure 8, the capacitance change trend of both is the similar, but the magnitude is different, which is due to the different magnitude of force applied by the manipulator when grasping two different weight objects. This successfully demonstrates that the prepared sensor has the ability to recognize the weight of the target and can be used as a tactile sensor to fix on the flexible manipulator to recognize the mass of the object.

4. Conclusions

In summary, a highly sensitive iontronic pressure sensor based on EDL sensing mechanism was designed and prepared. The electrodes based on a monolayer MoS2 were successfully prepared by the wet transfer method, and the PVA/H3PO4 ionic membrane with inverted pyramid microstructure was beneficial to enhancing the sensitivity. The pressure sensor showed a high sensitivity of 89.75 kPa−1 in the sensing range of 722.2kPa. Additionally, the sensor exhibited a short response time and relaxation time. Through analysis, the unique structure-induced high capacitance, the rationally designed structure such as the microstructural ionic film and device configuration are all beneficial to enhancing the sensitivity and sensing range. Finally, it is verified that the sensor has a great potential for motion detection and flexible robotics applications. Our sensor design makes a novel strategy for flexible sensor electronics and will inspire more committee focus on 2D materials-based sensor.
The next research should focus on the following items.
Firstly, the effect of different layers of MoS2 on the performance of the sensor and the mechanism of the effect should be investigated.
Secondly, the sensors should be further miniaturized to prepare higher integrated sensors such as the sensor arrays with a high sensitivity to achieve a large-scale application.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.G. and K.C.; methodology, D.X., L.D. and Y.W. (Yong Wang); software, S.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, D.X., L.D.; writing—review and editing, L.G., K.C., H.X., Y.W. (Yuejiao Wang) and L.H.; supervision, W.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.61904141), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (JB210407, JB210409), the Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi (Program No. 2021GY-277), Innovation Fund of Xidian University, the Young Talent fund of University Association for Science and Technology in Shaanxi, China (No. 20210508), and the funding of Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (No. 2021JQ-181).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, X.; Wang, W.; Wu, L.; Zhao, H.; Wang, M.; Wang, Y.; Xu, H.; Liu, M.; Gao, L. Wearable, Self-Cleaning, Wireless Integrated Tactile Sensory System with Superior Sensitivity. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2021, 331, 113027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Senthil Kumar, K.; Chen, P.-Y.; Ren, H. A Review of Printable Flexible and Stretchable Tactile Sensors. Research 2019, 2019, 3018568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Xiong, Y.; Shen, Y.; Tian, L.; Hu, Y.; Zhu, P.; Sun, R.; Wong, C.P. A Flexible, Ultra-Highly Sensitive and Stable Capacitive Pressure Sensor with Convex Microarrays for Motion and Health Monitoring. Nano Energy 2020, 70, 104436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Moses, O.A.; Gao, L.; Zhao, H.; Wang, Z.; Lawan Adam, M.; Sun, Z.; Liu, K.; Wang, J.; Lu, Y.; Yin, Z.; et al. 2D Materials Inks toward Smart Flexible Electronics. Mater. Today 2021, 50, 116–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xu, H.; Gao, L.; Wang, Y.; Cao, K.; Hu, X.; Wang, L.; Mu, M.; Liu, M.; Zhang, H.; Wang, W.; et al. Flexible Waterproof Piezoresistive Pressure Sensors with Wide Linear Working Range Based on Conductive Fabrics. Nano-Micro Lett. 2020, 12, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhao, X.F.; Hang, C.Z.; Wen, X.H.; Liu, M.Y.; Zhang, H.; Yang, F.; Ma, R.G.; Wang, J.C.; Zhang, D.W.; Lu, H.L. Ultrahigh-Sensitive Finlike Double-Sided E-Skin for Force Direction Detection. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 14136–14144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xu, H.; Gao, L.; Zhao, H.; Huang, H.; Wang, Y.; Chen, G.; Qin, Y.; Zhao, N.; Xu, D.; Duan, L.; et al. Stretchable and Anti-Impact Iontronic Pressure Sensor with an Ultrabroad Linear Range for Biophysical Monitoring and Deep Learning-Aided Knee Rehabilitation. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 2021, 7, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gao, L.; Fan, R.; Zhou, W.; Hu, X.; Cao, K.; Wang, W.; Lu, Y. Biomimetic and Radially Symmetric Graphene Aerogel for Flexible Electronics. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2019, 5, 1900353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, C.; Hou, X.; Cui, M.; Yu, J.; Fan, X.; Qian, J.; He, J.; Geng, W.; Mu, J.; Chou, X. An Ultra-Sensitive and Wide Measuring Range Pressure Sensor with Paper-Based CNT Film/Interdigitated Structure. Sci. China Mater. 2020, 63, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Lee, Y.; Park, J.; Cho, S.; Shin, Y.E.; Lee, H.; Kim, J.; Myoung, J.; Cho, S.; Kang, S.; Baig, C.; et al. Flexible Ferroelectric Sensors with Ultrahigh Pressure Sensitivity and Linear Response over Exceptionally Broad Pressure Range. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 4045–4054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Peng, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhong, L.; Pang, K.; Chen, Y.; Wanga, M.; Liu, W. A Flexible Dual-Modal Sensing System for Synchronous Pressure and Inertial Monitoring of Finger Movement. IEEE Sens. J. 2021, 21, 10483–10490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, Q.; Liu, Z.; Li, C.; Xie, K.; Zhu, P.; Shao, B.; Zhang, J.; Yang, J.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Q.; et al. Highly Transparent and Flexible Iontronic Pressure Sensors Based on an Opaque to Transparent Transition. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 2000348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhu, Z.; Li, R.; Pan, T. Imperceptible Epidermal–Iontronic Interface for Wearable Sensing. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1705122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xiao, Y.; Duan, Y.; Li, N.; Wu, L.; Meng, B.; Tan, F.; Lou, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhang, W.; Peng, Z. Multilayer Double-Sided Microstructured Flexible Iontronic Pressure Sensor with a Record-Wide Linear Working Range. ACS Sens. 2021, 6, 1785–1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Nie, B.; Li, R.; Brandt, J.D.; Pan, T. Iontronic Microdroplet Array for Flexible Ultrasensitive Tactile Sensing. Lab Chip 2014, 14, 1107–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kim, J.S.; Lee, S.C.; Hwang, J.; Lee, E.; Cho, K.; Kim, S.J.; Kim, D.H.; Lee, W.H. Enhanced Sensitivity of Iontronic Graphene Tactile Sensors Facilitated by Spreading of Ionic Liquid Pinned on Graphene Grid. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1908993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chang, Y.; Wang, L.; Li, R.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Q.; Yang, J.; Guo, C.F.; Pan, T. First Decade of Interfacial Iontronic Sensing: From Droplet Sensors to Artificial Skins. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2003464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, Q.; Liu, Y.; Shi, J.; Liu, Z.; Wang, Q.; Guo, C.F. High-Porosity Foam-Based Iontronic Pressure Sensor with Superhigh Sensitivity of 9280 KPa−1. Nano-Micro Lett. 2022, 14, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Keum, K.; Eom, J.; Lee, J.H.; Heo, J.S.; Park, S.K.; Kim, Y.H. Fully-Integrated Wearable Pressure Sensor Array Enabled by Highly Sensitive Textile-Based Capacitive Ionotronic Devices. Nano Energy 2021, 79, 101631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nie, B.; Li, R.; Cao, J.; Brandt, J.D.; Pan, T. Flexible Transparent Iontronic Film for Interfacial Capacitive Pressure Sensing. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 6055–6062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gao, L.; Wang, M.; Wang, W.; Xu, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, H.; Cao, K.; Xu, D.; Li, L. Highly Sensitive Pseudocapacitive Iontronic Pressure Sensor with Broad Sensing Range. Nano-Micro Lett. 2021, 13, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Park, M.; Park, Y.J.; Chen, X.; Park, Y.K.; Kim, M.S.; Ahn, J.H. MoS2-Based Tactile Sensor for Electronic Skin Applications. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 2556–2562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Qiu, D.; Chu, Y.; Zeng, H.; Xu, H.; Dan, G. Stretchable MoS 2 Electromechanical Sensors with Ultrahigh Sensitivity and Large Detection Range for Skin-on Monitoring. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 37035–37042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Veeralingam, S.; Sahatiya, P.; Badhulika, S. Papertronics: Hand-Written MoS on Paper Based Highly Sensitive and Recoverable Pressure and Strain Sensors. IEEE Sens. J. 2021, 21, 8943–8949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ruth, S.R.A.; Feig, V.R.; Tran, H.; Bao, Z. Microengineering Pressure Sensor Active Layers for Improved Performance. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2003491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hong, M.; Yang, P.F.; Zhou, X.B.; Zhao, S.Q.; Xie, C.Y.; Shi, J.P.; Zhang, Z.P.; Fu, Q.; Zhang, Y.F. Decoupling the Interaction between Wet-Transferred MoS2 and Graphite Substrate by an Interfacial Water Layer. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 5, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, H.; Zhang, Q.; Yap, C.C.R.; Tay, B.K.; Edwin, T.H.T.; Olivier, A.; Baillargeat, D. From Bulk to Monolayer MoS2: Evolution of Raman Scattering. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 1385–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, T.; Guo, W.; Ma, L.; Li, W.; Yu, Z.; Han, Z.; Gao, S.; Liu, L.; Fan, D.; Wang, Z.; et al. Epitaxial growth of wafer-scale molybdenum disulfide semiconductor single crystals on sapphire. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2021, 16, 1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gao, L.; Cao, K.; Hu, X.; Xiao, R.; Gan, B.; Wang, W.; Lu, Y. Nano Electromechanical Approach for Flexible Piezoresistive Sensor. Appl. Mater. Today 2020, 18, 100475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kang, M.; Kim, J.; Jang, B.; Chae, Y.; Kim, J.H.; Ahn, J.H. Graphene-Based Three-Dimensional Capacitive Touch Sensor for Wearable Electronics. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 7950–7957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Atalay, O.; Atalay, A.; Gafford, J.; Walsh, C. A Highly Sensitive Capacitive-Based Soft Pressure Sensor Based on a Conductive Fabric and a Microporous Dielectric Layer. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2018, 3, 1700237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Qin, R.; Hu, M.; Li, X.; Liang, T.; Tan, H.; Liu, J.; Shan, G. A New Strategy for the Fabrication of a Flexible and Highly Sensitive Capacitive Pressure Sensor. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 2021, 7, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Luo, Y.; Shao, J.; Chen, S.; Chen, X.; Tian, H.; Li, X.; Wang, L.; Wang, D.; Lu, B. Flexible Capacitive Pressure Sensor Enhanced by Tilted Micropillar Arrays. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 17796–17803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhou, Q.; Ji, B.; Wei, Y.; Hu, B.; Gao, Y.; Xu, Q.; Zhou, J.; Zhou, B. A Bio-Inspired Cilia Array as the Dielectric Layer for Flexible Capacitive Pressure Sensors with High Sensitivity and a Broad Detection Range. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 27334–27346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lee, J.; Kwon, H.; Seo, J.; Shin, S.; Koo, J.H.; Pang, C.; Son, S.; Kim, J.H.; Jang, Y.H.; Kim, D.E.; et al. Conductive fiber-based ultrasensitive textile pressure sensor for wearable electronics. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 2433–2439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Viry, L.; Levi, A.; Totaro, M.; Mondini, A.; Mattoli, V.; Mazzolai, B.; Beccai, L. Flexible three-axial force sensor for soft and highly sensitive artificial touch. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 2659–2664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Boutry, C.M.; Negre, M.; Jorda, M.; Vardoulis, O.; Chortos, A.; Khatib, O.; Bao, Z.N. A hierarchically patterned, bioinspired e-skin able to detect the direction of applied pressure for robotics. Sci. Robot. 2018, 3, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Qiu, Z.; Wan, Y.; Zhou, W.; Yang, J.; Yang, J.; Huang, J.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Q.; Huang, S.; Bai, N.; et al. Ionic Skin with Biomimetic Dielectric Layer Templated from Calathea Zebrine Leaf. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lu, P.; Wang, L.; Zhu, P.; Huang, J.; Wang, Y.; Bai, N.; Wang, Y.; Li, G.; Yang, J.; Xie, K.; et al. Iontronic pressure sensor with high sensitivity and linear response over a wide pressure range based on soft micropillared electrodes. Sci. Bull. 2021, 66, 1091–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cho, S.H.; Lee, S.W.; Yu, S.; Kim, H.; Chang, S.; Kang, D.; Hwang, I.; Kang, H.S.; Jeong, B.; Kim, E.H.; et al. Micropatterned Pyramidal Ionic Gels for Sensing Broad-Range Pressures with High Sensitivity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 10128–10135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wan, Y.; Qiu, Z.; Huang, J.; Yang, J.; Wang, Q.; Lu, P.; Yang, J.; Zhang, J.; Huang, S.; Wu, Z.; et al. Natural Plant Materials as Dielectric Layer for Highly Sensitive Flexible Electronic Skin. Small 2018, 14, e1801657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Pruvost, M.; Smit, W.J.; Monteux, C.; Poulin, P.; Colin, A. Polymeric foams for flexible and highly sensitive low-pressure capacitive sensors. NPJ Flex. Electron. 2019, 3, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Chhetry, A.; Kim, J.; Yoon, H.; Park, J.Y. Ultrasensitive Interfacial Capacitive Pressure Sensor Based on a Randomly Distributed Microstructured Iontronic Film for Wearable Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 3438–3449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Preparation and schematic diagram of iontronic pressure sensor. (a) Wet transfer process of MoS2 monolayer. (b) Digital optical image and flexible feature of iontronic pressure sensor and the corresponding diagram layout of each layer in the sensor.
Figure 1. Preparation and schematic diagram of iontronic pressure sensor. (a) Wet transfer process of MoS2 monolayer. (b) Digital optical image and flexible feature of iontronic pressure sensor and the corresponding diagram layout of each layer in the sensor.
Micromachines 13 00660 g001
Figure 2. Characterization of the sensor electrodes for flexible sensors. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of monolayer MoS2. (a) Optical image of the monolayer MoS2 on Au/PI film. (b) Raman data of the monolayer MoS2. (c,d) SEM of the monolayer MoS2 before and after transfer process. (e,f) SEM image after 5000 cycle stability test.
Figure 2. Characterization of the sensor electrodes for flexible sensors. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of monolayer MoS2. (a) Optical image of the monolayer MoS2 on Au/PI film. (b) Raman data of the monolayer MoS2. (c,d) SEM of the monolayer MoS2 before and after transfer process. (e,f) SEM image after 5000 cycle stability test.
Micromachines 13 00660 g002
Figure 3. Characterization of the ionic film for flexible sensors. (a) Low and (b) high magnification of the optical image of the ionic film. (c) SEM image of the ionic film. (d) Cross-sectional view of the ionic film.
Figure 3. Characterization of the ionic film for flexible sensors. (a) Low and (b) high magnification of the optical image of the ionic film. (c) SEM image of the ionic film. (d) Cross-sectional view of the ionic film.
Micromachines 13 00660 g003
Figure 4. The performance of the flexible sensor. (a) Capacitance variation of the sensor under various pressure. (b) Continuous pressure test of the sensor. (c) Response and relaxation time of the flexible sensor. (d) Durability test of the sensor under applied pressure of 138.9 kPa for 5000 cycles.
Figure 4. The performance of the flexible sensor. (a) Capacitance variation of the sensor under various pressure. (b) Continuous pressure test of the sensor. (c) Response and relaxation time of the flexible sensor. (d) Durability test of the sensor under applied pressure of 138.9 kPa for 5000 cycles.
Micromachines 13 00660 g004
Figure 5. (a) Capacitance variation of the sensor under various frequencies. (b) CV curve of the sensor at a scan rate of 50 mV s−1.
Figure 5. (a) Capacitance variation of the sensor under various frequencies. (b) CV curve of the sensor at a scan rate of 50 mV s−1.
Micromachines 13 00660 g005
Figure 6. Schematic illustration of the working mechanism of the sensor. (a) Sensing mechanism of the iontronic pressure sensor and the stress concertation of the microstructure. (b) Corresponding capacitance variation of the sensor.
Figure 6. Schematic illustration of the working mechanism of the sensor. (a) Sensing mechanism of the iontronic pressure sensor and the stress concertation of the microstructure. (b) Corresponding capacitance variation of the sensor.
Micromachines 13 00660 g006
Figure 7. Practical application of the flexible iontronic sensor for montion monitoring. Capacitance variations of the sensor during (a) finger (b) wrist (c) arm bending and (d) eye blinking. (e) Capacitance response output of gas leak monitoring, and the image is shown in the inset. (f) Comparison of the sensitivity of our pressure sensor with existing capacitive sensors.
Figure 7. Practical application of the flexible iontronic sensor for montion monitoring. Capacitance variations of the sensor during (a) finger (b) wrist (c) arm bending and (d) eye blinking. (e) Capacitance response output of gas leak monitoring, and the image is shown in the inset. (f) Comparison of the sensitivity of our pressure sensor with existing capacitive sensors.
Micromachines 13 00660 g007
Figure 8. Application of the sensor on flexible robotics. (a) The process to grasp and release apple; (b) Corresponding steps for the soft manipulator to grasp and release the apple and pear sample.
Figure 8. Application of the sensor on flexible robotics. (a) The process to grasp and release apple; (b) Corresponding steps for the soft manipulator to grasp and release the apple and pear sample.
Micromachines 13 00660 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, D.; Duan, L.; Yan, S.; Wang, Y.; Cao, K.; Wang, W.; Xu, H.; Wang, Y.; Hu, L.; Gao, L. Monolayer MoS2-Based Flexible and Highly Sensitive Pressure Sensor with Wide Sensing Range. Micromachines 2022, 13, 660. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13050660

AMA Style

Xu D, Duan L, Yan S, Wang Y, Cao K, Wang W, Xu H, Wang Y, Hu L, Gao L. Monolayer MoS2-Based Flexible and Highly Sensitive Pressure Sensor with Wide Sensing Range. Micromachines. 2022; 13(5):660. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13050660

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Dandan, Ling Duan, Suyun Yan, Yong Wang, Ke Cao, Weidong Wang, Hongcheng Xu, Yuejiao Wang, Liangwei Hu, and Libo Gao. 2022. "Monolayer MoS2-Based Flexible and Highly Sensitive Pressure Sensor with Wide Sensing Range" Micromachines 13, no. 5: 660. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13050660

APA Style

Xu, D., Duan, L., Yan, S., Wang, Y., Cao, K., Wang, W., Xu, H., Wang, Y., Hu, L., & Gao, L. (2022). Monolayer MoS2-Based Flexible and Highly Sensitive Pressure Sensor with Wide Sensing Range. Micromachines, 13(5), 660. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13050660

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop