Next Article in Journal
A Magnetorheological Duckbill Valve Micropump for Drug Delivery Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Efficient Water-Assisted Glass Cutting with 355 nm Picosecond Laser Pulses
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Wind-Induced Vibration on Measurement Range of Microcantilever Anemometer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Deformation Analysis of Continuous Milling of Inconel718 Nickel-Based Superalloy
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Experimental Study on Texture Coupling Mechanism and Antifriction Performance of Piston Rod Seal Pair

Micromachines 2022, 13(5), 722; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13050722
by Jie Tang, Jie Zeng * and Xin Lu *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Micromachines 2022, 13(5), 722; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13050722
Submission received: 28 March 2022 / Revised: 28 April 2022 / Accepted: 29 April 2022 / Published: 30 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Frontiers in Ultra-Precision Machining, Volume II)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Reviewer’s comments

Journal- Micromachines

 Manuscript Number- 1678506

Title of Paper-   ‘Experimental study on texture coupling mechanism and antifriction performance of piston rod seal pair”

 The paper concerns with experimental investigation related to the effect of different types of texture patterns on the friction and wear of a piston rod-rubber seal pair. The experiments were carried out using the reciprocating module of a UMT-2 friction and wear testing machine

Comments to the Author:

After going through the manuscript, the reviewer comes up with the following observation.

  • More recent and relevant studies need to be discussed in the introduction section.
  • How the selections of the operating and geometric parameters have been carried out in the study? Do these parameters follow some standards?
  • Why the validation of the present experimental results with earlier published articles is not presented? How the author clarifies the validity of work? There is no information, on the authenticity and validity of the adopted experimental methodology in the present work?
  • Most of the description in this paper was spent for describing the trends obtained from experimental results. The author(s) should compute the experimental results with physical explain for give more strength in paper.
  • Conclusions of the manuscripts are not up to the mark. Conclusions need to be revised. So as to make them more meaningful.

In the opinion of the reviewer, the author needs to suitably incorporate all these major and mandatory changes in the revised manuscript.

Author Response

Please see the attachment. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The results are interesting, but the article requires some clarifications:

  • How the friction factor Ff is measured?
  • I suggest converting the load (N) shown in Figures 4 and 5 into unit pressures (MPa). It would be easier to compare the results of this work with the results obtained by the other researchers
  • In Figures 6 and 7 it would be worth to add the results for the untextured samples.
  • How long did one test last? and are these results sufficient to assess the durability/wear of the tested material solutions?

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop