Next Article in Journal
Micro/Nano Periodic Surface Structures and Performance of Stainless Steel Machined Using Femtosecond Lasers
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation of Multiphase Flow in a Trifurcation Microchannel—A Benchmark Problem
Previous Article in Special Issue
Micro Energy Storage Systems in Energy Harvesting Applications: Analytical Evaluation towards Future Research Improvement
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Bibliometric Analysis of Low-Cost Piezoelectric Micro-Energy Harvesting Systems from Ambient Energy Sources: Current Trends, Issues and Suggestions

by
Mahidur R. Sarker
1,2,*,
Mohamad Hanif Md Saad
1,
Amna Riaz
3,
M. S. Hossain Lipu
4,
José Luis Olazagoitia
2 and
Haslina Arshad
1
1
Institute of IR 4.0, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
2
Industrial Engineering and Automotive, Nebrija University, Campus de la Dehesa de la Villa, Calle Pirineos, 55, 28040 Madrid, Spain
3
Department of Electrical Engineering, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60000, Pakistan
4
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Green University of Bangladesh, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2022, 13(6), 975; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13060975
Submission received: 10 April 2022 / Revised: 3 June 2022 / Accepted: 16 June 2022 / Published: 20 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wearable, Miniaturized, Implantable Energy Harvesters)

Abstract

:
The scientific interest in piezoelectric micro-energy harvesting (PMEH) has been fast-growing, demonstrating that the field has made a major improvement in the long-term evolution of alternative energy sources. Although various research works have been performed and published over the years, only a few attempts have been made to examine the research’s influence in this field. Therefore, this paper presents a bibliometric study into low-cost PMEH from ambient energy sources within the years 2010–2021, outlining current research trends, analytical assessment, novel insights, impacts, challenges and recommendations. The major goal of this paper is to provide a bibliometric evaluation that is based on the top-cited 100 articles employing the Scopus databases, information and refined keyword searches. This study analyses various key aspects, including PMEH emerging applications, authors’ contributions, collaboration, research classification, keywords analysis, country’s networks and state-of-the-art research areas. Moreover, several issues and concerns regarding PMEH are identified to determine the existing constraints and research gaps, such as technical, modeling, economics, power quality and environment. The paper also provides guidelines and suggestions for the development and enhancement of future PMEH towards improving energy efficiency, topologies, design, operational performance and capabilities. The in-depth information, critical discussion and analysis of this bibliometric study are expected to contribute to the advancement of the sustainable pathway for PMEH research.

1. Introduction

The research interest in low-cost piezoelectric micro-energy harvesting (PMEH) devices in energy harvesters has grown significantly over the last decade, and it has become one of the most interesting trends in future low-power sensor applications [1,2,3]. The topic of low-cost PMEH has risen to prominence as a fascinating new topic in terms of application and the need for alternative energy sources for the electrical powering of various microelectronics devices [4,5]. This trend has resulted in a massive increase in the number of publications that are extremely important for the future development of the devices. Since several years ago, many research activities have been undertaken and presented in order to highlight the progress of low-cost PMEH development and enhancement, particularly for wireless sensor networks (WSNs), internet of things (IoT), and consumer electronics applications [6,7].
Previous research work on low-cost PMEH using electromagnetic, electrostatic, and multi-frequency mechanical vibration-based electromagnetic energy conversion was published in different publications [1,8,9]. Meanwhile, research on functional materials, such as polymer composites that are applied to an electromagnetic actuator, and the integration of PMEH into the IoT, have significantly expanded the literature in the field of low-cost energy harvester (EH) systems [10,11]. However, just a few attempts have been made to assess the research’s influence in this area. It has also become difficult to understand the research progress on the low-cost PMEH topic, since the number of papers has expanded dramatically over the last decade, despite the lack of a clear direction. As a result, it is critical to conduct a thorough review of PMEH research progress through an analysis of the literature, in order to acquire appropriate directions for future development and research direction. The examination of a publication that highlights current research and development in a topic of concern and provides some guidance for future study is one of the most effective approaches for understanding the research roadmap. It can also help other scholars to avoid duplication of effort or research.
In the analytic revolution in a certain research field, the bibliometric analysis is a powerful and effective approach, rather than a critical review on PMEH giving a clear overview of the global developments [12,13]. Bibliometrics is a research method for analyzing a material quantitatively in a research subject. The analytical evaluation of scientific research publications data using quantitative and qualitative statistical approaches is referred to as analysis. The bibliographic mapping, publication profiling, grouping, and visualization of published works are all part of the investigation [14,15,16]. Furthermore, this study provides a helpful guide for experts to investigate prevalent interrelationships in the specific literature, as well as the impact of title, journals, researchers, countries, and organizations. The study may also be able to assist researchers in predicting future research trends.
Bibliometrics investigates numerous aspects of texts, such as co-relationship, paper structure, and paper strategy, using statistical and mathematical methodologies. A bibliometric analysis can also be used to assess different features of a certain study topic. Bibliometrics were applied to examine climate change vulnerability, haze study, COVID-19 research, and low carbon education research [17,18,19]. This study is a comprehensive analysis that was carried out in the field of PMEH in the last decade with complete information and the effect of all dependent parameters. Consequently, it is difficult to find PMEH research by identifying and summarizing it from all the manuscripts that were published in the last decade. This manuscript helps to evaluate the impact of different publications in the field of PMEH. Therefore, based on this analysis, the future direction of research and trends in the field of PMEH is clear. Table 1 presents a summarized analytical evaluation of the papers that were generated by numerous scholars in the field of PMEH, as well as research gaps [20,21].
The most important key findings and conclusions of this study are summarized below:
  • Mathematical modelling, algorithm creation, data collecting, and simulation for EH are the most common categories of study in published manuscripts (35.38 percent);
  • The most cited authors, the universities with the most publications, and the country with the most published articles on the mentioned topic are used to examine power converters for PMEH applications. This is critical for determining author, organization, and country productivity in the discussed topic, as well as improving research output and collaboration among authors;
  • The content and gap analysis keywords and themes are evaluated;
  • The analyzed documents are original manuscripts, review articles, and book chapters. The journals’ impact factors and the repute of the publishers in the scientific community are also investigated.
  • The extent of researcher collaboration is determined. The team is evaluated based on the number of authors in the manuscripts and the connections between different universities and countries. The goal of the developing trends and analytical assessment is to look at the top 100 papers in low-cost PMEH. As a result, thorough and detailed information, critical arguments, facts, analyses and flaws, issues, and challenges relating to these publications are discussed. This review has several advantages, including:
  • To present PMEH in low-cost applications, as well as current trends, evolution, applications, and future research potential;
  • To give a comparative assessment of the most appropriate publications for PMEH in low-cost applications that will help to expand current knowledge, experience, and implementation in the future;
  • Finally, this analytical study offers helpful recommendations for PMEH’s future development and possibilities in low-cost applications.
The remainder of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 discusses the methodological screening procedure of this study and how Table 2 was extracted from the Scopus database, as well as the publishing trend in this subject and the research characteristics. Section 3 discusses the analytical discussion related to the most-cited papers, the co-occurrence of keywords, most prominent authors’ affiliation, most prominent journal, study features, and other subject areas. Section 4 presents the issues and challenges of a low-cost PMEH system and the final section contains closing remarks and recommendations for future studies.

2. Review Methodology

The research survey was conducted in the Scopus database during the third week of December 2021, looking for articles that were published in journals indexed between 2010 and 2021, in order to gain complete information about the latest scientific research in the area of “low cost PMEH” from abundant energy resources. The primary goal of this study is to portray the latest picture of technological advancement and revolution in PMEH as it relates to power sources that generate power with low cost from abundant energy resources in the recent publications [26]. To choose the highly cited papers, we needed to search various criteria. In this manuscript, Bibliometric, which is a statistical study of the Scopus database, was employed for evaluation (www.scopus.com, 30 December 2021). Since it includes a larger number of publications than other databases, such as Web of Science, the Scopus database is the source of analysis in this analytical evaluation survey [27,28]. Google Scholar does not return precise results; for this reason, we do not consider Google Scholar in this survey. The “low cost PMEH” study was monitored in the Scopus database at the end of December 2021.

2.1. Literature Screening

A comprehensive report that is published in Scopus highlights the research output in PMEH from 2010 to 2021. There are three steps in the complete paper-screening procedure. To begin, all Scopus articles about PMEH are gathered as the primary input, which is linked with the title, abstract, and keywords of any phrases that are based on PMEH (such as microelectronic devices, abundant energy resources, and clean energy) [29,30]. The publication took place between 2010 and 2021.
Secondly, 551 papers covering numerous subjects, such as renewable energy resources, power harvesting, piezoelectric EH, and energy were initially identified. Finally, the first-recognized papers are divided into numerous categories, including journal articles, conference papers, books, reviews, and other sorts of publications for debate and additional study. Figure 1 depicts the overall selecting-procedure analytical evaluation approaches that were applied in the Scopus database. As illustrated in the image below, the process is divided into five steps:

2.2. Selection and Exclusion Criteria

The articles were chosen using predetermined criteria from a Scopus database. The initial searches for keywords that were utilized for the related manuscript in the Scopus database are listed in Table 2. The top 100 most-cited manuscripts in the subjects of low-cost EH, piezoelectric EH, low-cost electronic devices, low-cost applications that were chosen for article inclusion and exclusion were used:
  • The following keywords were used as the major criteria for including manuscripts: low-cost PMEH, low-cost electronics, low-cost applications, low-cost sensors, and low-cost controllers. Some articles were left from the list due to the field’s insignificance.
  • Manuscripts that were published in the English language from the years 2010 to 2021 were considered for the study’s aims.

2.3. Screening Procedures

Due to the differences in output for each database, compiling a single list of each article was impossible. The Scopus database was used for the screening process. For each keyword, the five screening steps were used, as shown below.
A varying number of articles were found in the Scopus database following the main search for “PMEH, renewable energy resources, and low cost control systems,” and it was comprehensive at different time frames.
  • The first screening was limited to the “EH system for low power applications” and 2549 articles were selected.
  • The articles were selected based on titles, keywords, the abstract, and contributions, and 551 manuscripts were selected.
  • The 201 articles were chosen after investigating the proper title and abstract.
  • The fourth screening selected 189 articles between the years 2010 and 2021.
  • Finally, the 100 top-cited articles are selected based on the year range.

2.4. Research Trend

The Scopus database was searched for all published papers using the following search terms: “renewable energy resources, low cost PMEH, low cost electronics, low cost application, and low cost control”. Figure 2 shows the research publications in the area of PMEH from the year 2010 to 2021.
Figure 2 shows that the search phrase “piezoelectric energy harvesting” yields the most publications, followed by EH, low-cost acquisition, low-cost applications, low-cost sensors, and low-cost control. The results of various papers differ from year to year. Overall, the patterns suggest an increase in the frequency of published manuscripts from 2010 to 2021, followed by a reduction in 2021.
The expanding number of articles on “piezoelectric EH” suggests that it is now widely used and accepted in engineering research. In the future, the industry’s growth tendency is likely to be a major development. However, since only the data for January 2021 were collected, it is too early to anticipate for 2021. The articles on piezoelectric EH, low-cost application, and low-cost acquisition are all at the top of the research papers that were released in 2020. The largest number of articles that were published in 2020 for piezoelectric EH was 15. However, the published papers for piezoelectric EH show the maximum number of 17 publications between 2017 and 2018. It is also an important point that papers were published on piezoelectric EH throughout 2010 to 2021.

2.5. Study Characteristics and Outcomes

This study looks at alternative search phrases in the Scopus database for the same-discipline analysis. From an analytical evaluation that is based on six keywords, we want to search manuscripts that are related to “low cost EH”. From 2010 to 2021, a total of 2549 papers were found in the Scopus database. All of the authors come from different backgrounds and nations, yet they all work on similar engineering problems. The low-cost PMEH and other databases are discussed in several bibliometric works in the literature. Empirical research with these findings can help in the future development of PMEH. The number of citations, keywords, the topic, publishing year, publisher, document type, impact factor, author’s h-index, university’s h-index, and authors with the more cited publications, organizations, and nations are all considered in this section. Finally, the bibliometric analysis is completed.

2.6. The Trends of Publishing Manuscripts per Year

Figure 3 depicts the frequency of manuscripts that were published from 2010 to 2021. Before scanning methods, a total of 493 (Figure 3) papers were examined. As can be seen, the number of papers that are released gradually increases until 2019, when there are approximately 66 papers. The rise in research demonstrates the industry’s acceptance and significant potential for development. Nonetheless, the quantity of publications has decreased slightly in recent years and will continue to do so through 2020. The number of published papers has reduced in previous years as the article number for January 2021 is yet to be determined. These data appear to be dynamic, and if maturity is achieved, the tendencies will shift in the future.
The most significant issue is to evaluate the publications with most referenced papers. The evaluation data for 100 publications on EH are presented in Table 3. The author’s name, article DOI, keywords, types of articles, abbreviated name, publisher, publishing year, country of origin, number of citations, and impact factor are used to classify the data. As can be observed, Chang et al. [31] have the most frequent citations (992). The title of the article refers to the “Direct-write piezoelectric polymeric nanogenerator with high energy conversion efficiency”. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the conversion of mechanical energy into electrical energy with the properties of high efficiency and low cost when nano semiconductors are used in EH. The paper was published in the American Chemical Society as a journal article. With 844 citations, a study by Mao et al. [32] is reported to be the second-highest citation article. With the keywords EH, low-cost electronics, and low-power, the topic of the paper is the investigation of green mobile edge-computing with an EH system [33]. The study in [34] reported a third high-citation publication in 2010. The title of the study is “Structural health monitoring of a cable stayed bridge using smart sensor technology: deployment and evaluation”. This paper is about the structural monitoring of the civil infrastructures with the help of WSNs. This system is low cost, has installation simplicity, and provides effective data management.
The top papers include Dong et al. [35], Fan [36], and Hu et al. [37], all of which have over two hundred citations. The impact factors of these three journals are 9.127, 15.881, and 17.881, respectively. Among 100 papers, 14 percent have received more than 100 citations, 14 percent have received more than 50 citations, while the remaining 72 percent have 50 citations or less. Nevertheless, the frequency of citations for a specific study is not the best way to indicate the quality of the research work [38,39,40]; however, it expresses the readership of the individual work and its impact on the creation of interventions, controversy, discussion, and some additional studies. This is also an advantage of the paper in the field.
Citation analysis has become a well-known method of determining manuscripts’ or authors’ impact on a certain topic in a publication [41,42,43]. The goal of this work was to determine the characteristics of low-power PMEH research. We have included the paper in the research even though it has a minimal number of citations. The top 100 cited articles were reviewed and debated, and it was discovered that the bulk of recent studies focused on the low-cost EH, low-cost electronics, and applications. The overall survey indicated that low-cost PMEH is important, not only as a power source, but also for health and structural monitoring. In terms of market potential, piezoelectric is advantageous for EH.
Table 3. The list of 100 highly influential papers for energy harvesting keywords and publication detail.
Table 3. The list of 100 highly influential papers for energy harvesting keywords and publication detail.
Rank
Based on Citation
ReferencesAuthor NameArticle DOIKeywordsType of
Article
Abbreviated
Name
PublisherPublishing
Year
CountryNCIF
1[31]Chang10.1021/nl9040719EH, PZT, low-cost acquisitionArticleNano LetterAmerican Chemical Society2010USA99211.189
2[32]Mao10.1109/JSAC.2016.2611964EH, low-cost electronics, low powerArticleISACEIEEE2016USA8449.144
3[34]Jang10.12989/sss.2010.6.5_6.439EH, low-cost sensors, WSN, low powerArticleSmart. Struct. Syst.Techno Press2010South Korea3553.342
4[35]Dong10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.01.090EH, PZT, low-cost applicationsReviewJ. Power SourcesElsevier2011The Netherlands3529.127
5[36]Fan10.1021/acsnano.5b00618EH, self-power, WSN, low-cost electronicsArticleACS NanoAmerican Chemical Society2015USA26615.881
6[37]Hu10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.11.038EH, PZT, low-cost sensors, powerArticlej.nanoenElsevier2014The Netherlands23717.881
7[44]Martinez10.1109/JSEN.2015.2445094EH, Low-cost electronics, low power, WSNArticleIEEE Sens. J.IEEE2015USA1733.301
8[45]Lee10.1002/adfm.201202867EH, PZT, low-cost sensors, self-powerArticleAdv. Funct. Mater.WILEY2013Germany19018.808
9[46]Garain10.1021/acsami.5b11356Low power, EH, PZT, sensorArticleACS AMIAmerican Chemical Society2016USA1479.229
10[47]Thielen10.1016/j.enconman.2016.11.005EH, low power, low-cost electronics, optimizationArticleECMADElsevier2017England1239.709
11[48]Wang10.1109/TMC.2017.2732979EH, low-cost sensors, low power, WSNArticleIEEE TMCIEEE2018USA1105.538
12[49]Ghosh10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.04.028PZT, sensors, self-powerArticleNano EnergyElsevier2017USA10917.881
13[50]Qiu10.1039/c2nr31031gLow-cost application, PZT, low powerArticleNanoscaleRoyal Society of Chemistry2012England1027.790
14[51]Liang10.1080/15583724.2010.515765EH, low-cost application, low-power devicesArticlePolym. RevTaylor and Francis2010USA10113.282
15[52]Kornbluh10.1557/mrs.2012.41EH, low-cost acquisition, electronics devicesArticleMRSBESpringer2012Germany956.578
16[53]You10.1039/c7ta10175aPZT, low-cost acquisition, self-poweredArticleJMCAERoyal Society of Chemistry2018England8512.732
17[54]Zhang10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.01.053Low-cost control, low power, autonomous sensorsArticleNano EnergyElsevier2017The Netherlands8517.881
18[55]Dudem10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.009PZT, EH, low-cost acquisitionArticleAPENDElsevier2018England789.746
19[56]Lee10.1088/0964-1726/23/9/095044Low-cost sensor, PZT, EHArticleSMSTEInstitute of Physics Publishing2014England723.585
20[57]Todaro10.1016/j.mee.2017.10.005PZT, EH, low power, low-cost acquisitionReviewMIENEElsevier2017The Netherlands722.523
21[58]Nunes-Pereira10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.12.001EH, low-cost acquisition, power, sensorArticleCPBEFElsevier2015England679.078
22[59]Park10.1186/s40580-016-0072-zPZT, low-cost sensor, EH, low powerReviewNano Converg.Korea Nano Technology Research Society2016USA618.526
23[60]Lu10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105251PZT, low-cost acquisition, EHReviewNano EnergyElsevier2020The Netherlands6017.881
24[61]Han10.1109/TIE.2014.2383992EH, low-cost applications, low powerArticleITIEDIEEE2015USA608.236
25[62]Datta10.1002/adfm.201604262PZT, low-cost acquisition, EHArticleAFMDCWiley2017Germany5918.808
26[63]Lazaro10.3390/s18113746EH, low-cost electronics, IoT devices, low powerReviewSensorsMDPI2018Switzerland563.576
27[64]De Pasquale10.1115/1.4006920EH, vibration, low power, low-cost controlArticleJCNDASME2012USA542.085
28[65]Sun10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.03.071PZT, low-cost sensor, EH, low-power electronicArticleNano EnergyElsevier2018The Netherlands5317.881
29[66]Awais10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2848907EH, WSN, low-cost acquisitionArticleIEEE AccessIEEE2018USA503.367
30[67]Vertechy10.1115/1.4028508EH, low-cost acquisition, low powerArticleJVACEASME2015USA461.583
31[68]Hänninen10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.09.001PZT, low-cost acquisition, EHArticleCAPODElsevier2018England499.381
32[69]Jing10.1088/1361-6463/aac827EH, PZT, low-cost acquisition, electric powerReviewJPAPBInstitute of Physics Publishing2018England463.207
33[70]Paprotny10.1109/JSEN.2012.2211868EH, PZT, low-cost sensor, power electronicArticleIEEE Sens. J.IEEE2013USA463.301
34[71]Jeon10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.08.002EH, low-cost acquisition, vibration, low powerArticleNano EnergyElsevier2015The Netherlands4317.881
35[72]Sarker10.1016/j.sna.2019.111634EH, PZT, low-cost application, optimization, WSNReviewSAAPEElsevier2019Switzerland423.407
36[73]Prashanthi10.1109/JMEMS.2011.2178118Low-cost applications, PZT, SensorArticleJMIYEIEEE2012USA412.417
37[74]La Rosa10.3390/s19122660EH, low-cost application, low power, WSNArticleSensorsMDPI2019Switzerland413.576
38[75]Nour10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.07.014PZT, EH, low-cost acquisitionArticleNano EnergyElsevier2014The Netherlands4017.881
39[76]Crossley10.1179/1743284714Y.0000000605PZT, EH, Low-cost acquisition, low powerArticleMSCTEManey2014England370.562
40[77]Ando10.1109/JSEN.2014.2386392Low-cost electronics, EH, vibrationArticleIEEE Sens. J.IEEE2015USA363.301
41[78]Tentzeris10.1109/JPROC.2014.2361599Low-cost sensor, EH, PZT, low powerReviewIEEPAIEEE2014USA3310.961
42[79]Cherumannil10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.08.052Low-cost acquisition, EH, PZTArticleNano EnergyElsevier2017The Netherlands3117.881
43[80]Liu10.1002/admt.201900744Low-cost electronics, EH, PZTArticleAdv. Mater. Technol.Wiley2019USA277.848
44[81]Song10.1039/d0ta08642hLow-cost applications, EH, PZTReviewJMCAERoyal Society of Chemistry2021England2612.732
45[82]Le10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156172Low-cost applications, EH, PZT, low powerReviewJALCEElsevier2020Switzerland245.316
46[83]Sun10.1021/acsnano.0c05493Low-cost applications, EH, PZT, sensorsArticleACS NanoAmerican Chemical Society2020USA2315.881
47[84]Han10.1109/JSEN.2017.2747122EH, vibration, PZT, low-cost applicationsArticleIEEE Sens. J.IEEE2017USA233.301
48[85]Bhunia10.1021/acsami.9b13360Low-cost electronics, EH, PZT, powerArticleACS Appl. Mater. InterAmerican Chemical Society2019USA209.229
49[86]Khansur10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.06.027Low-cost acquisition, EH, PZT, sensorsArticleCINNDElsevier2018England204.527
50[87]Kang10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.09.004Low-cost acquisition, EH, PZT, sensorsArticleNano EnergyElsevier2015The Netherlands2017.881
51[88]Algieri10.1021/acsaem.8b00820Low-cost applications, EH, PZTArticleACS AEMAmerican Chemical Society2018USA196.024
52[89]Rajagopalan10.1088/1361-6528/aaa6bdLow-cost applications, EH, PZT, sensorsArticleNNOTEIOP2018England193.874
53[90]Shivashankar10.1088/1361-665X/ab7541Low-cost acquisition, EH, PZTReviewSMSTEIOP2020England173.585
54[91]Maria10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.129Low-cost application, EH, PZT, sensorsArticleCPBEFElsevier2019England179.078
55[92]Liu10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.051EH, PZT, low powerArticleAPENDElsevier2018England169.746
56[93]Prashanthi10.1002/pssr.201105538EH, PZT, low-cost sensorArticlePhys. Status Solidi-Rapid Res. Lett.Wiley2012Germany162.821
57[94]Meddad10.1063/1.4751456Low-cost sensors, EH, PZTArticleJAPIAAMER INST PHYSICS2012USA152.546
58[95]Charoonsuk10.1039/c9tc01622hLow-cost applications, EH, PZTArticleJMCCCRoyal Society of Chemistry2019England147.393
59[96]Singh10.1088/2053-1591/3/7/075702Low-cost acquisition, EH, PZTArticleMater. Res. ExpressIOP2016England141.620
60[97]Hu10.1177/1045389X13489781Low-cost applications, EH, PZTArticleJMSSESage2014England142.569
61[98]Gong10.1016/j.energy.2019.115983Low-cost electronics, EH, PZT, low powerArticleEnergyElsevier2019England137.147
62[99]Kar10.1021/acsanm.8b00770Low-cost applications, EH, PZT, powerArticleACS ANMAmerican Chemical Society2018USA125.097
63[100]Nour10.1002/pssa.201600142Low-cost applications, EH, PZT, sensor, low powerArticlePSSABWiley2016Germany121.981
64[101]Vázquez10.3390/ma12223725Low-cost acquisition, EH, PZT, low powerArticleMaterialsMDPI2019Switzerland113.623
65[102]Yu10.1002/mame.201700214Low-cost applications, EH, PZTArticleMMENFWiley2017Germany104.367
66[103]Marinkovic10.1063/1.3524271EH, PZT, low-cost sensorArticleJAPIAAmerican Institute of Physics2011USA102.546
67[104]Zhao10.1007/s10854-021-06027-wEH, PZT, sensors, low-cost sensorArticleJMSMESpringer2021The Netherlands92.478
68[105]Manikandan10.1088/1361-6528/ab6b9eEH, PZT, low-cost acquisitionArticleNNOTEIOP Publishing2020England93.874
69[106]Clementi10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107171EH, PZT, low-cost acquisition, vibrationArticleMSSPEElsevier2021England86.823
70[107]Rjafallah10.1177/0021998318788604EH, PZT, vibration, low-cost acquisitionArticleJCOMBSage2019England82.591
71[108]Kandpal10.1109/TNANO.2017.2659383low-cost acquisition, PZT, EHArticleIEEE Trans. NanotechnolIEEE2017USA82.570
72[109]Aboubakr10.1080/15421406.2015.1137148low-cost acquisition, PZT, EHArticleMCLCDTaylor and Francis Inc2016England80.896
73[110]Lewis10.1080/00150193.2012.676955low-cost control, PZT, EHArticleFEROATaylor and Francis2012England80.620
74[111]Tu10.1021/acsami.0c16207low-cost acquisition, PZT, EH applicationsArticleACSAMIAmerican Chemical Society2020USA79.229
75[112]Anand10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156019low-cost acquisition, PZT, EH, low powerArticleJALCEElsevier2020Switzerland75.316
76[113]Vivekananthan10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145904PZT, EH, low powerArticleASUSEElsevier2020The Netherlands76.707
77[114]Chinya10.1016/j.materresbull.2019.110515low-cost acquisition, PZT, EH, vibrationArticleMRBUAElsevier2019England74.641
78[115]Amoroso10.12989/sss.2015.16.3.383Low-cost application, PZT, EH, WSNArticleSmart. Struct. Syst.Techno-Press2015South Korea73.342
79[116]Sarker10.3390/mi7100171PZT, EH, optimization, low-cost controlArticleMicromachinesMDPI2016Switzerland72.891
80[7]Sarker10.1080/00150193.2017.1359028PZT, EH, optimization, low-cost control, low voltageArticleFEROATaylor and Francis2016England70.620
81[117]Gao10.1002/advs.202101834low-cost applications, PZT, EH, low frequencyArticleAdv. Sci.Wiley2021USA616.806
82[118]Pei10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125338low-cost sensor, EH, low powerReviewJCROEElsevier2021England69.297
83[119]Tamil10.1142/S0219581X1950008Xlow-cost acquisition, PZT, EH applicationArticleInt. J. NanosciWorld Scientific Publishing2020Singapore60.68
84[120]Poulin10.1016/j.mssp.2018.12.013low-cost acquisition, EH, low power, PZTReviewMater. Sci. Semicond. ProcessElsevier2019England63.927
85[121]Yang10.3390/s18113733low-cost application, EH, PZT, low-cost devicesArticleSensorsMDPI2018Switzerland63.576
86[122]Wang10.1177/1045389X14549866low-cost applications, EH, PZT, vibration,ArticleJMSSESage2015England62.569
87[123]Lei10.1063/1.4921832EH, PZT, low-cost acquisition, devices, vibrationArticleJRSEAmerican Institute of Physics2015USA62.219
88[124]Chauhan10.1016/j.sna.2020.111879EH, PZT, low-cost sensor, WSNReviewSAAPEElsevier2020Switzerland53.407
89[125]Erturun10.1063/5.0030302EH, PZT, low-cost applications, low-power devicesArticleAPPLAAmerican Institute of Physics2021USA43.791
90[3]Le10.1016/j.sna.2020.112148EH, PZT, low-cost applications, low-power applicationsReviewSAAPEElsevier2020Switzerland43.407
91[126]Quattrocchi10.1109/TIM.2020.3026462EH, PZT, low-cost electronics, low power, vibrationArticleIEIMAIEEE2020USA44.016
92[127]Guiffard10.1007/s00339-014-8600-3EH, PZT, low-cost applicationsArticleAPAMFSpringer2015Germany42.584
93[128]Chuo10.1109/JSEN.2011.2160337EH, PZT, low-cost applications, micro-sensorsArticleIEEE Sens. JIEEE2011USA43.301
94[129]Xia10.1088/1361-665X/aba48dEH, PZT, self-power, sensors, low-cost acquisitionArticleSMSTEIOP Publishing2020England33.585
95[130]Tabhane10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106564low-cost acquisition, EH, PZT, energy storageArticlePOTEDElsevier2020England34.282
96[131]Lozoya-Santos10.3390/app10124387EH, PZT, low-cost, low-power applicationsArticleAppl. SciMDPI2020Switzerland32.679
97[132]Dietze10.1002/mame.201900538EH, PZT, low-cost sensorArticleMMENFWiley2019Germany34.367
98[133]He10.1007/s11664-019-07025-9EH, PZT, low-cost acquisitionArticleJECMASpringer2019USA31.938
99[1]Sarker10.3390/electronics10091108EH, low power, WSN, low-cost controlReviewElectronicsMDPI2021Switzerland32.397
100[4]Riaz10.3390/s21155041Micro EH, low-cost electronics, WSN, energy storageReviewSensorsMDPI2021Switzerland33.576
NC is the number of citations, IF is the impact factor.
A graphical representation of the total number of publications versus years is pro-vided in Figure 4. The data clearly show that manuscripts that were published in 2016 and 2017 accounted for only 50 percent and 62.5 percent of total publications, respectively. Figure 4 depicts the 16 most-cited manuscripts per year in the area of low-cost PMEH from 2010 to 2021. Figure 4 shows that the year 2013 had the fewest papers published (2), followed by 2010 and 2011 with three articles. As a result, it can be stated that as the age of publications increases, so does the quantity of citations.

3. Evaluation and Outcomes

To discover and extend a topic, it is necessary to identify and comprehend recent research trends, as well as the most notable research in that discipline. The goal of this study is to figure out how important current research trends are, as well as to find important articles on the subject of PMEH.

3.1. PMEH Application on the Different Research Areas

When low-cost PMEH, low-cost electronics, low-cost applications were entered in numerous areas of engineering, computer science, physics and astronomy, material science, and energy, 808 papers surfaced based on the classifications of the gathered articles. The paper classification screening is carried out in this phase using the title, abstract, and keywords. Nonetheless, it is not easy to analyze a work in a specific sector because a manuscript in the PMEH topic incorporates interdisciplinary concerns. The core topic, for example, in engineering is computer science, although physics and materials science are also vital to consider. As a result, the article is divided into four categories: engineering, computer science, material science, and physics. Figure 5 shows the top five fields in PMEH research from 2010 to 2021, according to this guideline. The research was demonstrated to encompass a wide range of topics, including engineering, computer science, material science, physics, and energy. As a result, it is clear that engineering, with 359 papers (44.4 percent of the total screened papers), is the most popular field, followed by computer science, material science, physics and astronomy, and energy.
It is also evident that materials and physics have more papers than energy, indicating that basic science continues to dominate this field of study. Table 4 lists the most referenced publications based on the more prolific authors, country of origin, and number of articles, h-index, and author position. The author with the highest (eight) number of referenced papers is Magno of Switzerland in the university of ETH Zürich. With seven articles, Tentzeris from the Georgia Institute of Technology is the author with the second most citations. Table 4 shows that the USA is ranked second, third, and fourth in this ranking. From the United States, Wang et al. have the top citations (239,581) and the greatest h-index (240). Tentzeris et al. have the second highest number of citations (16,749) and an h-index of 62.

3.2. Countries Researching in Low-Cost PMEH

The energy supply to operate the low voltage electronic device has become a global problem as the component of micro-electronic products has become smaller and more compact [134,135]. As a result, it is critical to examine articles on EH-device research that have been published in various countries. Figure 6 depicts the distribution of nations where low-cost PMEH research is carried out. Over the last decade, the USA has been the most active in conducting low-cost PMEH research. A total of 31 papers were provided by USA scholars, accounting for 60.8 percent of the total papers that were examined (in Figure 6 this is indicated by a sea-green color). This is acceptable because the USA’s demand for microelectronic devices has increased rapidly over the previous decade and so it is closely tied to low-cost PMEH requirements. China has the second highest publications, indicated by a purple circle; India has publications in the third position with a baby-blue color; and South Korea is in fourth position with an olive-green color in Figure 6.

3.3. Journal Publication and Impact Factor Evaluation

The low-cost PMEH area is connected to a variety of interdisciplinary domains and manuscripts that are published in a variety of journals. The number of publications in specific journals was used to assess the journals that publish PMEH. The Journal of Nano Energy, IEEE Sensors Journal, and Sensors published articles on low-cost PMEH, as shown in Figure 7. This also indicated that Nano Energy (nine papers), IEEE Sensors Journal (five papers), and Sensors (four papers) had the highest number of papers.
Table 3 was created with the study contributions according to the types of documents. As illustrated in Figure 7a, this group solely considers the contributions of the manuscripts that have a frequency of around 51 (51%) of the total 100 documents. Figure 7a displays the lists of journal contributions that are received in the Scopus database for each year (2010–2021). According to Figure 7a, Nano Energy has the most documents (nine publications), IEEE Sensors Journal has five, and Sensors has four publications.
The ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, Applied Energy, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, ACS Nano, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, and Nanotechnology also have a publication on low-cost PMEH, applications, etc. Table 3 and Figure 7b show the impact factors that determine the quality of each journal. Figure 7c then looks at the journal’s review according to the publisher. As indicated in Figure 7c, Elsevier has the largest percentage of published manuscripts (30%), followed by IEEE (13%), MDPI AG (8%), the American Chemical Society, and Wiley (8%). On the other hand, IOP has 5%, and Springer, the Royal Society of Chemistry, and Taylor and Francis have 4% of publications.

3.4. Analysis of Main Author Contributions

The most prolific writers were identified by an examination of the scholars who wrote the 24 publications on low-cost PMEH, as well as their co-author networks’ relationships. The minimal number of manuscripts published by an author for this analysis is five; this criterion was met by 35 authors in total. Bernulli d. is the most productive of the 35 authors, contributing eleven low-cost PMEH publications, followed by Magno m., who produced ten. As illustrated in Figure 8, the research group that contributed to the PMEH can be divided into ten groups. Each group’s name was replaced with the leading author, such as Zhang, Wang, and Wang, with each group being highlighted with yellow, green, and red in Figure 8.

3.5. Authors Affiliation in PMEH Research

Table 5 shows the top ten affiliations for PMEH studies, which include the Laboratoire de G & eacute, nie Electrique et Ferro & eacute, and lectricit & eacute (six papers); Jeju National University (five papers); Università degli Studi di Catania (four papers); University of Florida (four papers); Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon (four papers); Georgia Institute of Technology (four papers); Jadavpur University (four papers); University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (four papers); Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (four papers); and Université Chouaib Doukkali (four papers).

3.6. Top Cited Manuscripts on PMEH

Table 6 shows the top ten most-cited publications in low-cost PMEH over the last 5 years, as measured by the total citations (TC) and average annual citation (ACY) parameters. It is clear from Table 6 that Mao et al. have the highest citations in the last 5 years with a publication titled, “Dynamic Computation Offloading for Mobile-Edge Computing with Energy Harvesting Devices”. On the other hand, Chang, with “Direct-write piezoelectric polymeric Nano generator with high energy conversion efficiency” has the second highest number of citations; Hu et al., with “Recent progress in piezoelectric Nano-generators as a sustainable power source in self-powered systems and active sensors” has the third highest citations. In Table 6, the research gap of these entire publications/research fields is also highlighted.
Based on the selected top-cited publications, Table 7 shows the published manuscripts according to the research type. In the survey, there are five different categories of study. The most common categories of research in published papers include mathematical modelling, algorithm development, data collection, and simulation for EH (35.38 percent). This method is essential for implementing a high-performing system. The second highest type of study (29.61%) is based on EH through piezoelectric material that are synthesized for low-cost applications. A total of 23.1% of articles focus on optimization techniques for sizing, low-cost control, low-cost devices, and low-cost electronics, which provides depth, knowledge, and the main idea of controllable EH studies, while 6.54% of manuscripts are based on detailed review (surveys, critical, state-of-the-art strategic–technical). Currently, researchers have focused more on operational theory, design requirements, and experimental discoveries that demonstrate unique research for low-cost PMEH.
Table 8 shows a more in-depth understanding of the subject as it relates to low-cost PMEH research findings. The subject areas in which the majority of papers were mentioned are listed in this table. The most frequent publication is (30.56%) on the EH system. At 21.53 percent, manuscripts on piezoelectric EH come in second, followed by EH for manuscripts on low-power devices at 13.89 percent. A very limited number of papers (less than 2%) were found in the field of EH for low-cost control systems.

3.6.1. Energy-Harvesting System

Recent advances in sensing technologies, low-power processing, and communication have enabled the IoT, which is expected to become the semiconductor industry’s largest electronics market [44]. A promising idea is to have billions of wirelessly connected sensor devices that can collect and analyze data for a wide range of applications, including fitness and sports, machinery, and health monitoring [34]. In IoT technology, the main trend is to reduce form factors and power consumption while boosting functionality [63]. A fast-growing class of such devices is wearable, where sensors nodes are tightly coupled with the human body [47]. Low-power consumption is critical in wearable devices due to battery weight and size limits, which significantly limit the amount of energy that can be stored. Although integrated circuits have increased their energy efficiency significantly, battery technology has not kept pace in terms of volumetric energy density gains. Furthermore, customer expectations for wearable devices suggest that they will last months, if not years, rather than the daily recharges that are usual in today’s wearable devices [66]. As a result, a low-power design is not enough to make these gadgets genuinely wearable. EH is a new but well-established technology for extending the battery life of wearable devices and allowing continuous recharging of the energy storage while in use [48]. Wearable devices, on the other hand, are constrained in terms of size and weight, and must also be compatible with the human body.

3.6.2. Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting

Piezoelectric nanogenerators that can harvest energy from mechanical energy in the environment are appealing for a variety of applications [37,55,60]. In this research, we show how to transform low-frequency mechanical energy into electric power utilizing piezoelectric ZnO nanorods that are manufactured on a standard paper substrate in a simple and low-cost way [50,82]. This energy-conversion device has extremely high flexibility and piezoelectric sensitivity and can generate output voltages of up to 10 mV and currents of up to 10 nA. It is proved that by regulating the straining rate, the device’s electric output behavior may be switched between four different modes. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that by increasing the device’s size, the electric output may be increased. This EH technique offers a simple and cost-effective platform for capturing low-frequency mechanical energy, such as that which is generated by body movements, for practical applications [68,86].

3.6.3. Energy Harvesting for Low-Cost Applications

Due to increased electricity demand, EH from underused natural-waste energy sources is becoming more widespread. Depending on the environmental conditions, the sources can produce micro- to milliwatts of electricity. Many researchers have focused on micro-level EH in order to deliver power to micro-devices in remote locations [35,136]. The concept results in a significant cost decrease. Once the structure is in place it can generate electricity at a low cost and with little effort, similar to renewable energy sources [72,74,84]. This study examines the mechanical and electronic approaches that are pioneered by different researchers in the PMEH system. Following a thorough examination, it was shown that existing technologies are more or less capable of EH when using piezoelectric elements; nevertheless, the systems’ consistency and stability are not yet up to par. The implementation of the optimization technique to improve the performance of vibration-based PMEH has been considered in this study. Several problems and solutions for next-generation EH using vibration-based piezoelectric devices were the subjects of this review.

3.6.4. Energy Harvesting for Low-Cost Acquisition

The low-cost EH device is based on a rectenna to address the issue in places where battery constraints exist [62,68]. For the EH and IoT applications an energy harvester is built, optimized, constructed, and described, regarding the instability of AC in stable DC power. Human-to-human and human-to-machine communications were recently used by the IoT [34,44]. The IoT allows for device-to-device communication without the need for human interaction, which presents several issues [47]. Due to restricted energy capacities, the machine’s self-sustainability is a major difficulty in this paradigm.

3.6.5. Energy Harvesting for Low-Cost Sensors

A wide range of items can be controlled precisely, locally, remotely, or autonomously with the help of modern low-power sensors [34,37]. Vehicles, appliances, HVAC systems, hospital intensive care units, oil refineries, and military and security systems are all using them. They are essential components for a wide range of global applications. EH technology, for example, permits small, freestanding sensors to operate continuously for long periods of time (even decades) without the need for power lines or battery replacements. This technology significantly improves the problem-solving capabilities of low-power sensors, the cost is low, and its adoption is fast increasing [68,77].

3.6.6. Energy Harvesting for Low-Cost Electronics

Electronic gadgets and systems with wireless capabilities are becoming increasingly popular since they do not require a connection to the main power grid [32,36]. As a result, many gadgets in both the industrial and home environments are completely powered by batteries with the connection lines serving primarily to recharge the batteries. Battery makers have a substantially extended battery life, but they still need to be maintained on a regular basis, and the cost of batteries is increased by thousands of working hours. Furthermore, depleted batteries become garbage that must be recycled. On the other hand, low-cost PMEH is the best energy source for microelectronic devices with the advantages of low cost, ease of maintenance, and little environmental effect [77,85].

3.6.7. Energy Harvesting for Low-Cost Control

EH is significant because it provides an alternative power source for electronic devices in areas where conventional energy sources are unavailable. It has the same advantage in remote sites, underwater, and other difficult-to-reach situations where conventional batteries and energy are insufficient [54,64]. An EH system is controlled by providing an energy storage device with two energy harvesters. The EH is connected to a storage device to transfer the generated power. The transfer characteristics of the EH depend upon the load characteristics.

3.6.8. Energy Harvesting for Low-Power Devices

The amount of power that is utilized by every component in the system must be carefully identified and minimized for independent sensor designs that cannot connect to the AC power main, especially those that must function for lengthy periods of time between battery changes or cannot be accessible for maintenance. It is fantastic if the low-power devices can be powered by a low-cost EH system [34,54,57].

3.7. Keywords Analysis

The keywords are necessary to identify the paper’s principal focus and make it easier for readers to map [137,138]. The VOSviewer software is used to examine and evaluate the sample keywords in order to highlight the high frequency of keywords and their correlations. The minimum number of keywords was set at 5, and Figure 9 shows 25 of them.
The terms “EH”, “electrostatics”, and “damping” were used the most. Furthermore, “piezoelectricity, piezoelectric devices, natural frequencies, and sensor nodes” were frequently mentioned in the low-cost PMEH literature. The data also show that some significant topics, such as materials and actuator ideas (i.e., piezoelectric, electrostatic, and electromagnetic), as well as methodology, are gaining a lot of attention across several dimensions (i.e., finite element analysis, nonlinear). The interrelationships between those words have also helped to understand low-cost PMEH topics over the last 11 years.
The piezoelectricity circle, for example, is light green in color. We can observe that the highlighted keywords occurred around 2014 based on the color references in the bottom right corner of the Figure 9. In general, the researcher seemed to be more interested in these issues at that time. Furthermore, EH and nanogenerators are two terms that may occur in the future in relation to low-cost PMEH.
Table 9 shows the top 13 keywords from the chosen database that were used in multiple articles from 2010 to 2021. By examining the highest keywords, the current literature gaps may be detected, and insight into the recent study field can be gained. The three most common phrases in Table 9 are “EH”, “piezoelectric EH”, and “low cost acquisition”. From 2010 to 2021, the most common terms were “low cost electronics”, “low cost sensors”, “low cost applications”, and “low cost control”, demonstrating the increased interest in low-cost PMEH applications. Figure 10 shows the total keyword allocation, as well as a graphical representation of Table 9. In Figure 10, the top 11 most popular keywords over the last eleven years can be seen. The keyword EH is found to be the most frequently utilized. Piezoelectric EH, low-cost acquisition, low-cost electronics, low-cost sensors, low-cost applications, WSN, vibration, optimization, and sensors are among the other important keywords. Table 3 also shows all of the essential terms that are used throughout the manuscript.

4. Low-Cost Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting System: Issues and Challenges

The design and deployment of low-cost PMEH is a tough process because there are multiple factors that must be considered, such as economic viability, reliability, power and frequency control, battery-characteristics uncertainty (energy storage system), and environmental considerations [139,140]. However, such challenges can be overcome with an appropriate combination of technological development and implementation. The following is a list of some of the most popular key concerns and challenges in the field of low-power PMEH [141,142]. The scavenging of energy from abundant energy sources faces several challenges, including the availability of the wasted abundant resources in our surroundings, the latest technology of EH, and very good knowledge of low-power electronic devices and the availability of efficient energy-storage systems.

4.1. Technical Problems

One of the important parameters in the design of PMEH is the geometry of the piezoelectric cantilever beam [143,144]. Different shapes of the PMEH have different output power levels. The output of the harvesting structure is very low i.e., in the range of µ Watts, full-bridge rectifications are used to obtain the output at usable levels. Another problem is the uncertainty of the vibrations; controllers are used to fix this problem [145,146,147]. Different types of controllers are used with converters. The output also has harmonics which affects the quality of the output power and needs proper filtration. There are different options to store the generated output power; in the market, different batteries and supercapacitors are available and used according to the application and scenario.

4.2. Establishment of Electrical Parameters Model

For the design of a piezoelectric EH it is very important to set the standards for (a) the modeling and naming method, (b) terms and formulas, (c) piezoelectric material characteristics, and (d) electrical performance methods. For the modeling and simulation, different techniques and analyzing software are available, but the proper practice is required for the simulations (especially when dealing with COMSOL and ANYSIS, etc.). [144,148]. COMSOL Multiphysics is a simulation and finite element analysis software that runs on any platform. It supports both traditional physics-based user interfaces and partial-differential equations systems. Most of the time, ANSYS is used for volumetric simulations. The same simulations can be carried out with COMSOL, but with different techniques [149,150].

4.3. Economic Impact

The most frequently encountered challenge in developing and implementing an effective low-cost PMEH is cost reduction [151,152]. The third most prevalent area of study, according to Table 9 is “low cost acquisition” research. In the last 11 years, about 40% of the articles that were chosen focused on low-cost electronics, low-cost sensors, low-cost applications, low-cost control, and low-power devices. The existing problem could be solved by a cost-optimized system that integrates PMEH with abundant energy resources [153]. With the development of low-cost PMEH the usage of traditional batteries is reducing with time [154]. The cost of batteries as compared to the PMEH is very high, hence the low-cost PMEH is making a positive impact on the electronic industry.

4.4. Power Quality Impact

PMEH can be utilized as a backup power source in existing low-voltage electronic devices or as a power source for WSNs etc., [155,156,157]. However, unprecedented fluctuations in power dissipation, voltage, frequency controls, and power management challenges may arise as a result of abundant energy resources integration with low-cost PMEH. For power management, different types of boosters, filters, and controllers are available, but with the application of these circuits the price is increased at the cost of the output power [158].

4.5. Environmental Impact

Low-cost PMEHs play an important role in the development of microelectronic devices and reduce the greenhouse effect, compared to fossil fuels. The PMEH have no negative environmental impact except for the energy storage systems, e.g., batteries have a negative impact on the surroundings due to their toxic materials. When batteries fail, the chemicals leak into the earth, contaminating groundwater and surface water [159]. When our ecosystems are contaminated with battery chemicals, thousands of aquatic plants and animals are harmed. PMEH with SC benefits the environment not just by reducing the number of discarded primary, but also by reducing the number of raw materials that are mined [160,161,162].

4.6. Storing Energy

Ambient energy sources now play a critical role in integrating the EH system in order to achieve the low-cost PMEH [163,164]. The integration of abundant energy with the current EH industry is gaining popularity, particularly in America and Europe, and Asia. Nonetheless, batteries are still the most common source of electricity in the world. Now, these sources are not usually advised due to their unreliability and greenhouse effect on the environment. The development of low-cost PMEH with abundant energy sources could be the future of EH microelectronic devices [165]. Researchers are currently working on improving the efficiency and output power of PMEH.

5. Conclusions and Suggestions

The primary purpose of this research was to summarize low-cost PMEH applications in microelectronic devices, low-cost applications, and low-cost control to advance the existing literature by identifying key knowledge gaps that may be addressed in future research. We identify the most relevant subjects in existing research and uncover emerging and prospective research routes using a bibliometric analysis and qualitative reviews of chosen articles. A total of 100 publications were picked for the analysis and considered for the final review. The findings of the review can be relevant to scholars who are researching the low-cost PMEH.
Despite the increasing literature on PMEH, there are still a lack of publications that provide a comprehensive view of PMEH future advancements, broadening the subject’s understanding and bridging the knowledge gap. As a result, our analysis focused on identifying numerous subjects and research emphases at the intersection of PMEH and low-cost applications. This analysis provides several useful insights. For improved harvesting, the cost and quality of the output power is important. The efficiency of the PMEH system can be increased by the following suggestions:
  • By the application of a hybrid method, the output efficiency can be increased. Hybrid EH devices have been proposed in recent years to overcome the energy insufficiency issue of a single energy harvester. A proper hybridization of multiple energy conversion methods not only enhances space utilization efficiency, but also greatly increases the power output;
  • The fuzzy controller is capable of correcting fluctuations that are induced by external factors, such as room temperature and convection of voltage;
  • Neural networks can have a huge number of free parameters (the weights and biases across interconnected units), which allow them to fit exceedingly complicated data that other models are unable to fit (when trained correctly);
  • Harmonics is also a problem that needs to be tackled. Depending on the configuration and application, passive harmonic filters use inductors and capacitors to block or shunt harmonics, causing them to ground. The impedance of an inductor increases as the frequency increases, whereas the impedance of a capacitor decreases;
  • In most converter circuits there is a significant amount of switching and power loss in the passive components. Various wide-bandgap (WBG) material compositions, such as silicon carbide (SiC) and gallium nitride (GaN) are currently used in the development of converters because of their capacity to handle high voltages and currents while dissipating low heat. Despite this, the material is unreliable and costly. As a result, future research should place a higher priority on the adoption of these complex materials for PMEH applications;
  • In addition to wide-bandgap (WBG) materials, such as SiC and GaN, much attention is now being paid to ultra-wide bandgap (UWBG) materials, such as Al(Ga)N and Ga2O3, since they have a greater power density and can be used in high-power applications. Although UWBG materials are still in the early stages of development, they have the potential to be used as switches in DC-DC converters, which could have several benefits for PMEH applications. As a result, more research should be carried out to determine the best material composition for building a suitable converter for EV applications that is reliable, affordable in cost, and has a high switching frequency;
  • The various converter topologies confront high harmonics in output current, low current, voltage stress, and low impedance. Further research is needed to improve the electrical design features, in order to attain high frequency and low converter loss. In addition, investigations on mechanical design optimization should be carried out, in order to improve reliability and accuracy;
  • External design schemes are as significant as internal design features when it comes to converters. Improving internal electric-design elements is insufficient to provide the desired results and improvements. Changing the internal electric design, on the other hand, often adds unnecessary complexity and is exceedingly time-consuming and costly. In this regard, numerous investigations are being undertaken in order to produce various passive and active power filters that can improve the performance of converter from the outside. The main benefit of these power filters is that they are simple to construct using low-cost power electronic components and may significantly reduce high harmonics, disturbances, and noises in the converter output signals;
  • Due to numerous factors, such as low current stress, easy control mechanism, and high-performance efficiency, the use of multilayer multi-phase bidirectional converters in PMEH technology has increased significantly. However, more research is needed to determine the needs for additional components and complicated analyses in both steady-state and transient settings. Furthermore, the converters have a high-duty cycle sensitivity to varying loading conditions. As a result, it is recommended that efforts be focused on building an integrated design framework in order to improve scalability and reliability;
  • Machine learning approaches are now being investigated extensively for predicting and analyzing various forms of power converter problems, such as short circuit and open circuit faults. The ability to accurately detect these defects is important because it can prevent the converters from physical damage and other potentially dangerous situations. As a result, machine learning techniques are becoming increasingly important in the implementation of power converters in PMEH applications.
Furthermore, the results of this review will motivate researchers to continue working on building intelligent converters in the PMEH field with improved design configuration and operational capabilities. The intelligent converters deal with progress in speed, efficiency, and power processing. Overall, this study aids in the development of a strategy for future sustainable PMEH expansion. Our research demonstrates the importance of these publications and their impact in the advancement of low-cost PMEH over time. In terms of global effect, different countries were mentioned. The current study uncovers several novel insights on the role of PMEH for low-cost applications and increasing the efficiency of microelectronic devices.
Our research demonstrates the importance of these publications and their impact in the advancement of low-cost PMEH throughout time. In terms of global effect, different countries were mentioned. The current study uncovers several novel insights on the role of PMEH for low-cost applications and increasing the efficiency of microelectronic devices.
Citation analysis on a certain subject within a specific publication has become a common way to assess a journal’s, author’s, or article’s quality. A systematic review is another way to assess an article’s worth by looking at the author’s affiliation, citations, keywords, and most prestigious journals. The top papers of the 100 most-cited papers are included in the suggested article to provide insight into the historical and present approach of researchers in scientific analysis, and issues related to low-cost PMEH. There are numerous advantages to determining the characteristics of the most-cited papers, including:
  • The characteristics of highly cited works in the field of low-cost PMEH for low-cost and microelectronic devices applications can provide future researchers with a clear picture;
  • A bibliographical analysis can give researchers a fantastic perspective on a thriving and developing field of research, motivating various devoted researchers to employ current and new technologies to advance a specific research field;
  • Researchers and journal editors can use the topmost cited article-analysis to help them review submitted articles.
However, it is expected that identifying and assessing articles that had a significant influence between 2010 and 2021 will help to inform future EH, in order to achieve an independent and efficient power source.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, M.R.S.; writing—review and editing, M.R.S., M.H.M.S., A.R., M.S.H.L., J.L.O. and H.A.; project administration, M.R.S.; funding acquisition, M.R.S. and M.H.M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia under Grant Code GGPM-2021-050 and GPK-4IR-2020-017.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sarker, M.R.; Saad, M.H.M.; Olazagoitia, J.L.; Vinolas, J. Review of power converter impact of electromagnetic energy harvesting circuits and devices for autonomous sensor applications. Electronocs 2021, 10, 1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Costa de Oliveira, F.A.; de Lima Monteiro, D.W.; Colombo, D.M. Design, modeling, characterization and analysis of a low frequency micro-fabricated piezoelectric cantilever for vibration sensing and energy harvesting applications. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2021, 326, 112709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Le Scornec, J.; Guiffard, B.; Seveno, R.; Le Cam, V. Frequency tunable, flexible and low cost piezoelectric micro-generator for energy harvesting. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2020, 312, 112148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Riaz, A.; Sarker, M.R.; Saad, M.H.M.; Mohamed, R. Review on Comparison of Different Energy Storage Technologies Used in Micro-Energy Harvesting, WSNs, Low-Cost Microelectronic Devices: Challenges and Recommendations. Sensors 2021, 21, 5041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sarker, M.R.; Mohamed, R.; Saad, M.H.M.; Tahir, M.; Hussain, A.; Mohamed, A. A Hybrid Optimization Approach for the Enhancement of Efficiency of a Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting System. Electronics 2021, 10, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yuksel, M.E.; Fidan, H. Energy-aware system design for batteryless LPWAN devices in IoT applications. Ad Hoc Netw. 2021, 122, 102625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sarker, M.R.; Mohamed, A.; Mohamed, R. Improved proportional-integral voltage controller for a piezoelectric energy harvesting system converter utilizing lightning search algorithm. Ferroelectrics 2017, 514, 123–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mohamed, R.; Sarker, M.R.; Mohamed, A. Modelling of a low frequency based rectangular shape piezoelectric cantilever beam for energy harvesting applications. Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 2018, 12, 290–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sarker, M.R.; Mohamed, A.; Mohamed, R. Implementation of non-controlled rectifier circuit based on vibration utilizing piezoelectric bending generator. Int. J. Appl. Electromagn. Mech. 2017, 54, 471–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, L.; Guo, X.; Lee, C. Promoting smart cities into the 5G era with multi-field Internet of Things (IoT) applications powered with advanced mechanical energy harvesters. Nano Energy 2021, 88, 106304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, S. Sports training monitoring of energy-saving IoT wearable devices based on energy harvesting. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2021, 45, 101168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hamidah, I.; Pawinanto, R.E.; Mulyanti, B.; Yunas, J. A bibliometric analysis of micro electro mechanical system energy harvester research. Heliyon 2021, 7, e06406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Elgarahy, A.M.; Hammad, A.; El-Sherif, D.M.; Abouzid, M.; Gaballah, M.S.; Elwakeel, K.Z. Thermochemical conversion strategies of biomass to biofuels, techno-economic and bibliometric analysis: A conceptual review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 106503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jiang, D.; Shi, B.; Ouyang, H.; Fan, Y.; Wang, Z.L.; Chen, Z.M.; Li, Z. A 25-year bibliometric study of implantable energy harvesters and self-powered implantable medical electronics researches. Mater. Today Energy 2020, 16, 100386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, Y.; Zhu, S.; Gu, Z.; Zhao, Y. A bibliometric analysis: Research progress and prospects on transition metal dichalcogenides in the biomedical field. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2021, 32, 3762–3770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Alagumalai, A.; Mahian, O.; Aghbashlo, M.; Tabatabaei, M.; Wongwises, S.; Wang, Z.L. Towards smart cities powered by nanogenerators: Bibliometric and machine learning–based analysis. Nano Energy 2021, 83, 105844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ranjbari, M.; Shams Esfandabadi, Z.; Gautam, S.; Ferraris, A.; Scagnelli, S.D. Waste management beyond the COVID-19 pandemic: Bibliometric and text mining analyses. Gondwana Res. 2022, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Li, M.; Porter, A.L.; Wang, Z.L. Evolutionary trend analysis of nanogenerator research based on a novel perspective of phased bibliographic coupling. Nano Energy 2017, 34, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sarirete, A. A Bibliometric Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccines and Sentiment Analysis. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2021, 194, 280–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. dos Santos, B.S.; Steiner, M.T.A.; Fenerich, A.T.; Lima, R.H.P. Data mining and machine learning techniques applied to public health problems: A bibliometric analysis from 2009 to 2018. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2019, 138, 106120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Islam, A.; Hassini, S.; El-Dakhakhni, W. A systematic bibliometric review of optimization and resilience within low impact development stormwater management practices. J. Hydrol. 2021, 599, 126457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Abdollahi, A.; Rejeb, K.; Rejeb, A.; Mostafa, M.M.; Zailani, S. Wireless Sensor Networks in Agriculture: Insights from Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ferrari, G.; Pezzuolo, A.; Nizami, A.S.; Marinello, F. Bibliometric Analysis of Trends in Biomass for Bioenergy Research. Energies 2020, 13, 3714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Azam, A.; Ahmed, A.; Kamran, M.S.; Hai, L.; Zhang, Z.; Ali, A. Knowledge structuring for enhancing mechanical energy harvesting (MEH): An in-depth review from 2000 to 2020 using CiteSpace. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 150, 111460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Reyes-Belmonte, M.A. The energy and environment connection, research trends based on a bibliometric analysis. Energy Ecol. Environ. 2021, 6, 479–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Calderón, A.; Barreneche, C.; Prieto, C.; Segarra, M.; Fernández, A.I. Concentrating Solar Power Technologies: A Bibliometric Study of Past, Present and Future Trends in Concentrating Solar Power Research. Front. Mech. Eng. 2021, 7, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cabeza, L.F.; Chàfer, M.; Mata, É. Comparative Analysis of Web of Science and Scopus on the Energy Efficiency and Climate Impact of Buildings. Energies 2020, 13, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Jabeen, S.; Malik, S.; Khan, S.; Khan, N.; Qureshi, M.I.; Saad, M.S.M. A comparative systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis on sustainability of renewable energy sources. Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy 2021, 11, 270–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jahani, K.; Rafiei, M.M. Experimental study of optimum piezoelectric energy harvester circuit under various excitations. ACM Int. Conf. Proc.Ser. 2016, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tang, S.; Tan, L.; Liu, T. Modeling and performance analysis of energy harvesting wireless communication systems with reliable energy backup. Int. J. Commun. Syst. 2021, 34, e4698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chang, C.; Tran, V.H.; Wang, J.; Fuh, Y.K.; Lin, L. Direct-write piezoelectric polymeric nanogenerator with high energy conversion efficiency. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 726–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Mao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Letaief, K.B. Dynamic Computation Offloading for Mobile-Edge Computing with Energy Harvesting Devices. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2016, 34, 3590–3605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Merrett, G.V.; Al-Hashimi, B.M. Energy-driven computing: Rethinking the design of energy harvesting systems. In Proceedings of the Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE), Lausanne, Switzerland, 27–31 March 2017; pp. 960–965. [Google Scholar]
  34. Jang, S.; Jo, H.; Cho, S.; Mechitov, K.; Rice, J.A.; Sim, S.H.; Jung, H.J.; Yun, C.B.; Spencer, B.F.; Agha, G. Structural health monitoring of a cable-stayed bridge using smart sensor technology: Deployment and evaluation. Smart Struct. Syst. 2010, 6, 439–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Dong, Z.; Kennedy, S.J.; Wu, Y. Electrospinning materials for energy-related applications and devices. J. Power Sources 2011, 196, 4886–4904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fan, X.; Chen, J.; Yang, J.; Bai, P.; Li, Z.; Wang, Z.L. Ultrathin, rollable, paper-based triboelectric nanogenerator for acoustic energy harvesting and self-powered sound recording. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 4236–4243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Hu, Y.; Wang, Z.L. Recent progress in piezoelectric nanogenerators as a sustainable power source in self-powered systems and active sensors. Nano Energy 2014, 14, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Aimmanee, S.; Phongsitthisak, C. Analysis of electrical energy harvesting from piezoelectric integrated shallow conical composite shells in metastable configurations using mixed formulation. Compos. Struct. 2022, 282, 115031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kan, J.; Wang, J.; Wu, Y.; Chen, S.; Wang, S.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, Z. Energy harvesting from wind by an axially retractable bracket-shaped piezoelectric vibrator excited by magnetic force. Energy 2022, 240, 122495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Banerjee, S.; Bairagi, S.; Ali, S.W. A Critical Review on Lead-Free Hybrid Materials for Next Generation Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting and Conversion. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 16402–16421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chen, M.; Guo, Z.; Dong, Y.; Chiclana, F.; Herrera-Viedma, E. Citations optimal growth path: A tool to analyze sensitivity to citations of h-like indexes. J. Informetr. 2021, 15, 101215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, S.; Gao, Y. A literature review and citation analyses of air travel demand studies published between 2010 and 2020. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2021, 97, 102135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Menegaki, A.N.; Ahmad, N.; Aghdam, R.F.Z.; Naz, A. The convergence in various dimensions of energy-economy-environment linkages: A comprehensive citation-based systematic literature review. Energy Econ. 2021, 104, 105653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Martinez, B.; Montón, M.; Vilajosana, I.; Prades, J.D. The Power of Models: Modeling Power Consumption for IoT Devices. IEEE Sens. J. 2015, 15, 5777–5789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Lee, S.; Bae, S.H.; Lin, L.; Yang, Y.; Park, C.; Kim, S.W.; Cha, S.N.; Kim, H.; Park, Y.J.; Wang, Z.L. Super-flexible nanogenerator for energy harvesting from gentle wind and as an active deformation sensor. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 2445–2449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Garain, S.; Jana, S.; Sinha, T.K.; Mandal, D. Design of in Situ Poled Ce3+-Doped Electrospun PVDF/Graphene Composite Nanofibers for Fabrication of Nanopressure Sensor and Ultrasensitive Acoustic Nanogenerator. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 4532–4540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Thielen, M.; Sigrist, L.; Magno, M.; Hierold, C.; Benini, L. Human body heat for powering wearable devices: From thermal energy to application. Energy Convers. Manag. 2017, 131, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Wang, C.; Li, J.; Yang, Y.; Ye, F. Combining Solar Energy Harvesting with Wireless Charging for Hybrid Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2018, 17, 560–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ghosh, S.K.; Adhikary, P.; Jana, S.; Biswas, A.; Sencadas, V.; Gupta, S.D.; Tudu, B.; Mandal, D. Electrospun gelatin nanofiber based self-powered bio-e-skin for health care monitoring. Nano Energy 2017, 36, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Qiu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Hu, L.; Yang, D.; Wang, L.; Wang, B.; Ji, J.; Liu, G.; Liu, X.; Lin, J.; et al. Flexible piezoelectric nanogenerators based on ZnO nanorods grown on common paper substrates. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 6568–6573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liang, Y.; Yu, L. Development of semiconducting polymers for solar energy harvesting. Polym. Rev. 2010, 50, 454–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kornbluh, R.D.; Pelrine, R.; Prahlad, H.; Wong-Foy, A.; McCoy, B.; Kim, S.; Eckerle, J.; Low, T. Dielectric elastomers: Stretching the capabilities of energy harvesting. MRS Bull. 2012, 37, 246–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. You, M.H.; Wang, X.X.; Yan, X.; Zhang, J.; Song, W.Z.; Yu, M.; Fan, Z.Y.; Ramakrishna, S.; Long, Y.Z. A self-powered flexible hybrid piezoelectric-pyroelectric nanogenerator based on non-woven nanofiber membranes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 3500–3509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhang, X.S.; Su, M.; Brugger, J.; Kim, B. Penciling a triboelectric nanogenerator on paper for autonomous power MEMS applications. Nano Energy 2017, 33, 393–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Dudem, B.; Kim, D.H.; Bharat, L.K.; Yu, J.S. Highly-flexible piezoelectric nanogenerators with silver nanowires and barium titanate embedded composite films for mechanical energy harvesting. Appl. Energy 2018, 230, 865–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lee, C.; Tarbutton, J.A. Electric poling-assisted additive manufacturing process for PVDF polymer-based piezoelectric device applications. Smart Mater. Struct. 2014, 23, 095044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Todaro, M.T.; Guido, F.; Mastronardi, V.; Desmaele, D.; Epifani, G.; Algieri, L.; De Vittorio, M. Piezoelectric MEMS vibrational energy harvesters: Advances and outlook. Microelectron. Eng. 2017, 183, 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nunes-Pereira, J.; Sencadas, V.; Correia, V.; Cardoso, V.F.; Han, W.; Rocha, J.G.; Lanceros-Méndez, S. Energy harvesting performance of BaTiO3/poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene) spin coated nanocomposites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2015, 72, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Park, K.I.; Jeong, C.K.; Kim, N.K.; Lee, K.J. Stretchable piezoelectric nanocomposite generator. Nano Converg. 2016, 3, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Lu, L.; Ding, W.; Liu, J.; Yang, B. Flexible PVDF based piezoelectric nanogenerators. Nano Energy 2020, 78, 105251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Han, J.; Hu, J.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wang, S.X.; He, J. A Nonintrusive Power Supply Design for Self-Powered Sensor Networks in the Smart Grid by Scavenging Energy from AC Power Line. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2015, 62, 4398–4407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Datta, A.; Choi, Y.S.; Chalmers, E.; Ou, C.; Kar-Narayan, S. Piezoelectric Nylon-11 Nanowire Arrays Grown by Template Wetting for Vibrational Energy Harvesting Applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1604262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lazaro, A.; Villarino, R.; Girbau, D. A survey of NFC sensors based on energy harvesting for IoT applications. Sensors 2018, 18, 3746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. De Pasquale, G.; Somà, A.; Zampieri, N. Design, simulation, and testing of energy harvesters with magnetic suspensions for the generation of electricity from freight train vibrations. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 2012, 7, 041011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sun, J.G.; Yang, T.N.; Wang, C.Y.; Chen, L.J. A flexible transparent one-structure tribo-piezo-pyroelectric hybrid energy generator based on bio-inspired silver nanowires network for biomechanical energy harvesting and physiological monitoring. Nano Energy 2018, 48, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Awais, Q.; Jin, Y.; Chattha, H.T.; Jamil, M.; Qiang, H.; Khawaja, B.A. A compact rectenna system with high conversion efficiency for wireless energy harvesting. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 35857–35866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Vertechy, R.; Papini Rosati, G.P.; Fontana, M. Reduced model and application of inflating circular diaphragm dielectric elastomer generators for wave energy harvesting. J. Vib. Acoust. 2015, 137, 011004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hänninen, A.; Sarlin, E.; Lyyra, I.; Salpavaara, T.; Kellomäki, M.; Tuukkanen, S. Nanocellulose and chitosan based films as low cost, green piezoelectric materials. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 202, 418–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Jing, Q.; Kar-Narayan, S. Nanostructured polymer-based piezoelectric and triboelectric materials and devices for energy harvesting applications. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2018, 51, 303001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Paprotny, I.; Xu, Q.; Chan, W.W.; White, R.M.; Wright, P.K. Electromechanical energy scavenging from current-carrying conductors. IEEE Sens. J. 2013, 13, 190–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jeon, S.B.; Kim, D.; Seol, M.L.; Park, S.J.; Choi, Y.K. 3-Dimensional broadband energy harvester based on internal hydrodynamic oscillation with a package structure. Nano Energy 2015, 17, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Sarker, M.R.; Julai, S.; Sabri, M.F.M.; Said, S.M.; Islam, M.M.; Tahir, M. Review of piezoelectric energy harvesting system and application of optimization techniques to enhance the performance of the harvesting system. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2019, 300, 111634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Prashanthi, K.; Naresh, M.; Seena, V.; Thundat, T.; Ramgopal Rao, V. A novel photoplastic piezoelectric nanocomposite for MEMS applications. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 2012, 21, 259–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. La Rosa, R.; Livreri, P.; Trigona, C.; Di Donato, L.; Sorbello, G. Strategies and techniques for powering wireless sensor nodes through energy harvesting and wireless power transfer. Sensors 2019, 19, 2660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Nour, E.S.; Sandberg, M.O.; Willander, M.; Nur, O. Handwriting enabled harvested piezoelectric power using ZnO nanowires/polymer composite on paper substrate. Nano Energy 2014, 9, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Crossley, S.; Whiter, R.A.; Kar-Narayan, S. Polymer-based nanopiezoelectric generators for energy harvesting applications. Energy Mater. Mater. Sci. Eng. Energy Syst. 2014, 9, 1613–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ando, B.; Baglio, S.; Bulsara, A.R.; Marletta, V.; Ferrari, V.; Ferrari, M. A low-cost snap-through-buckling inkjet-printed device for vibrational energy harvesting. IEEE Sens. J. 2015, 15, 3209–3220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Tentzeris, M.M.; Georgiadis, A.; Roselli, L. Energy harvesting and scavenging. Proc. IEEE 2014, 102, 1644–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Cherumannil Karumuthil, S.; Rajeev, S.P.; Varghese, S. Piezo-tribo nanoenergy harvester using hybrid polydimethyl siloxane based nanocomposite. Nano Energy 2017, 40, 487–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Liu, Y.; Zhao, L.; Wang, L.; Zheng, H.; Li, D.; Avila, R.; Lai, K.W.C.; Wang, Z.; Xie, Z.; Zi, Y.; et al. Skin-Integrated Graphene-Embedded Lead Zirconate Titanate Rubber for Energy Harvesting and Mechanical Sensing. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2019, 4, 1900744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Song, Y.; Shi, Z.; Hu, G.H.; Xiong, C.; Isogai, A.; Yang, Q. Recent advances in cellulose-based piezoelectric and triboelectric nanogenerators for energy harvesting: A review. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 1910–1937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Le, A.T.; Ahmadipour, M.; Pung, S.Y. A review on ZnO-based piezoelectric nanogenerators: Synthesis, characterization techniques, performance enhancement and applications. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 844, 156172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Sun, J.; Guo, H.; Ribera, J.; Wu, C.; Tu, K.; Binelli, M.; Panzarasa, G.; Schwarze, F.W.M.R.; Wang, Z.L.; Burgert, I. Sustainable and biodegradable wood sponge piezoelectric nanogenerator for sensing and energy harvesting applications. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 14665–14674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Han, Y.; Feng, Y.; Yu, Z.; Lou, W.; Liu, H. A Study on Piezoelectric Energy-Harvesting Wireless Sensor Networks Deployed in a Weak Vibration Environment. IEEE Sens. J. 2017, 17, 6770–6777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Bhunia, R.; Gupta, S.; Fatma, B.; Prateek; Gupta, R.K.; Garg, A. Milli-Watt Power Harvesting from Dual Triboelectric and Piezoelectric Effects of Multifunctional Green and Robust Reduced Graphene Oxide/P(VDF-TrFE) Composite Flexible Films. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 38177–38189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Khansur, N.H.; Eckstein, U.; Benker, L.; Deisinger, U.; Merle, B.; Webber, K.G. Room temperature deposition of functional ceramic films on low-cost metal substrate. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 16295–16301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kang, P.G.; Lee, T.K.; Ahn, C.W.; Kim, I.W.; Lee, H.H.; Choi, S.B.; Sung, K.D.; Jung, J.H. Vertically aligned epitaxial KNbO3 nanorod array for piezoelectric energy harvester and second harmonic generator. Nano Energy 2015, 17, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Algieri, L.; Todaro, M.T.; Guido, F.; Mastronardi, V.; Desmaële, D.; Qualtieri, A.; Giannini, C.; Sibillano, T.; De Vittorio, M. Flexible Piezoelectric Energy-Harvesting Exploiting Biocompatible AlN Thin Films Grown onto Spin-Coated Polyimide Layers. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2018, 1, 5203–5210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Rajagopalan, P.; Singh, V.; Palani, I.A. Enhancement of ZnO-based flexible nano generators via a sol-gel technique for sensing and energy harvesting applications. Nanotechnology 2018, 29, 105460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Shivashankar, P.; Gopalakrishnan, S. Review on the use of piezoelectric materials for active vibration, noise, and flow control. Smart Mater. Struct. 2020, 29, 053001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Maria Joseph Raj, N.P.; Alluri, N.R.; Khandelwal, G.; Kim, S.J. Lead-free piezoelectric nanogenerator using lightweight composite films for harnessing biomechanical energy. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 161, 608–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Liu, W.; Qin, G.; Zhu, Q.; Hu, G. Synchronous extraction circuit with self-adaptive peak-detection mechanical switches design for piezoelectric energy harvesting. Appl. Energy 2018, 230, 1292–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Prashanthi, K.; Zhang, H.; Ramgopal Rao, V.; Thundat, T. Local piezoelectric response of ZnO nanoparticles embedded in a photosensitive polymer. Phys. Status Solidi-Rapid Res. Lett. 2012, 6, 77–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Meddad, M.; Eddiai, A.; Guyomar, D.; Belkhiat, S.; Cherif, A.; Yuse, K.; Hajjaji, A. An adaptive prototype design to maximize power harvesting using electrostrictive polymers. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 112, 054109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Charoonsuk, T.; Sriphan, S.; Nawanil, C.; Chanlek, N.; Vittayakorn, W.; Vittayakorn, N. Tetragonal BaTiO3 nanowires: A template-free salt-flux-assisted synthesis and its piezoelectric response based on mechanical energy harvesting. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019, 7, 8277–8286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Singh, A.; Das, S.; Bharathkumar, M.; Revanth, D.; Karthik, A.R.B.; Sastry, B.S.; Rao, V.R. Low cost fabrication of polymer composite (h-ZnO + PDMS) material for piezoelectric device application. Mater. Res. Express 2016, 3, 075702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Hu, Z.; Smith, R.C.; Burch, N.; Hays, M.; Oates, W.S. A modeling and uncertainty quantification framework for a flexible structure with macrofiber composite actuators operating in hysteretic regimes. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2014, 25, 204–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Gong, Y.; Shan, X.; Luo, X.; Pan, J.; Xie, T.; Yang, Z. Direction-adaptive energy harvesting with a guide wing under flow-induced oscillations. Energy 2019, 187, 115983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Kar, E.; Bose, N.; Dutta, B.; Mukherjee, N.; Mukherjee, S. MWCNT@SiO2 Heterogeneous Nanofiller-Based Polymer Composites: A Single Key to the High-Performance Piezoelectric Nanogenerator and X-band Microwave Shield. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2018, 1, 4005–4018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Nour, E.S.; Chey, C.O.; Willander, M.; Nur, O. Low frequency accelerator sensor based on piezoelectric ZnO nanorods grown by low temperature scalable process. Phys. Status Solidi Appl. Mater. Sci. 2016, 213, 2503–2508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Vázquez-Rodríguez, M.; Jiménez, F.J.; Pardo, L.; Ochoa, P.; González, A.M.; de Frutos, J. A new prospect in road traffic energy harvesting using lead-free piezoceramics. Materials 2019, 12, 3725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Yu, B.; Mao, M.; Yu, H.; Huang, T.; Zuo, W.; Wang, H.; Zhu, M. Enhanced Piezoelectric Performance of Electrospun Polyvinylidene Fluoride Doped with Inorganic Salts. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2017, 302, 1700214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Marinkovic, B.; Kaya, T.; Koser, H. Characterization of ferroelectric material properties of multifunctional lead zirconate titanate for energy harvesting sensor nodes. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 109, 014904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Zhao, J.; Li, F.; Wang, Z.; Dong, P.; Xia, G.; Wang, K. Flexible PVDF nanogenerator-driven motion sensors for human body motion energy tracking and monitoring. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2021, 32, 14715–14727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Manikandan, M.; Rajagopalan, P.; Patra, N.; Jayachandran, S.; Muralidharan, M.; Mani Prabu, S.S.; Palani, I.A.; Singh, V. Development of Sn-doped ZnO based ecofriendly piezoelectric nanogenerator for energy harvesting application. Nanotechnology 2020, 31, 185401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Clementi, G.; Lombardi, G.; Margueron, S.; Suarez, M.A.; Lebrasseur, E.; Ballandras, S.; Imbaud, J.; Lardet-Vieudrin, F.; Gauthier-Manuel, L.; Dulmet, B.; et al. LiNbO3 films–A low-cost alternative lead-free piezoelectric material for vibrational energy harvesters. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2021, 149, 107171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Rjafallah, A.; Hajjaji, A.; Guyomar, D.; Kandoussi, K.; Belhora, F.; Boughaleb, Y. Modeling of polyurethane/lead zirconate titanate composites for vibration energy harvesting. J. Compos. Mater. 2019, 53, 613–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Kandpal, M.; Palaparthy, V.; Tiwary, N.; Rao, V.R. Low Cost, Large Area, Flexible Graphene Nanocomposite Films for Energy Harvesting Applications. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 2017, 16, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Aboubakr, S.; Rguiti, M.; Yessari, M.; Elballouti, A.; Courtois, C.; Hajjaji, A. Dielectric characterization of lead zirconate-titane(PZT) /polyurethane(PU) thin film composite: Volume fraction, frequency and temperature dependence. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2016, 627, 82–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Lewis, R.W.C.; Allsopp, D.W.E.; Shields, P.; Šatka, A.; Yu, S.; Topolov, V.Y.; Bowen, C.R. Nano-imprinting of highly ordered nano-pillars of lithium niobate (LiNbO3). Ferroelectrics 2012, 429, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Tu, R.; Sprague, E.; Sodano, H.A. Precipitation-Printed High-β Phase Poly(vinylidene fluoride) for Energy Harvesting. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 58072–58081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Anand, A.; Meena, D.; Bhatnagar, M.C. Synthesis and characterization of flexible PVDF/Bi2Al4O9/RGO based piezoelectric materials for nanogenerator application. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 843, 156019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Vivekananthan, V.; Maria Joseph Raj, N.P.; Alluri, N.R.; Purusothaman, Y.; Chandrasekhar, A.; Kim, S.J. Substantial improvement on electrical energy harvesting by chemically modified/sandpaper-based surface modification in micro-scale for hybrid nanogenerators. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 514, 145904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Chinya, I.; Pal, A.; Sen, S. Flexible, hybrid nanogenerator based on Zinc Ferrite nanorods incorporated poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) nanocomposite for versatile mechanical energy harvesting. Mater. Res. Bull. 2019, 118, 110515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Amoroso, F.; Pecora, R.; Ciminello, M.; Concilio, A. An original device for train bogie energy harvesting: A real application scenario. Smart Struct. Syst. 2015, 16, 383–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Sarker, M.; Mohamed, A.; Mohamed, R.; Sarker, M.R.; Mohamed, A.; Mohamed, R. A New Method for a Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting System Using a Backtracking Search Algorithm-Based PI Voltage Controller. Micromachines 2016, 7, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Gao, S.; He, T.; Zhang, Z.; Ao, H.; Jiang, H.; Lee, C. A Motion Capturing and Energy Harvesting Hybridized Lower-Limb System for Rehabilitation and Sports Applications. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2101834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Pei, J.; Guo, F.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, B.; Bi, Y.; Li, R. Review and analysis of energy harvesting technologies in roadway transportation. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 288, 125338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Tamil Selvan, R.; Jayathilaka, W.A.D.M.; Hilaal, A.; Ramakrishna, S. Improved Piezoelectric Performance of Electrospun PVDF Nanofibers with Conductive Paint Coated Electrode. Int. J. Nanosci. 2020, 19, 1950008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Poulin-Vittrant, G.; Dahiya, A.S.; Boubenia, S.; Nadaud, K.; Morini, F.; Justeau, C.; Alquier, D. Challenges of low-temperature synthesized ZnO nanostructures and their integration into nano-systems. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2019, 91, 404–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Yang, Z.; Zarabi, S.; Fernandes, E.; Rua-Taborda, M.I.; Debéda, H.; Salehian, A.; Nairn, D.; Wei, L. A simple wireless sensor node system for electricity monitoring applications: Design, integration, and testing with different piezoelectric energy harvesters. Sensors 2018, 18, 3733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Wang, L.; Lallart, M.; Petit, L.; Lebrun, L.; Cottinet, P.J.; Guyomar, D. Low-cost charge of electrostrictive polymers for efficient energy harvesting. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2015, 26, 2123–2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Lei, J.X.; Qiu, Y.; Yang, D.C.; Zhang, H.Q.; Yin, B.; Ji, J.Y.; Zhao, Y.; Hu, L.Z. A vibration-driven nanogenerator fabricated on common paper substrate for harvesting energy from environment. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2015, 7, 033115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Chauhan, S.S.; Bhatt, U.M.; Gautam, P.; Thote, S.; Joglekar, M.M.; Manhas, S.K. Fabrication and modeling of β-phase PVDF-TrFE based flexible piezoelectric energy harvester. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2020, 304, 111879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Erturun, U.; Eisape, A.A.; Kang, S.H.; West, J.E. Energy harvester using piezoelectric nanogenerator and electrostatic generator. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2021, 118, 063902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Quattrocchi, A.; Freni, F.; Montanini, R. Power Conversion Efficiency of Cantilever-Type Vibration Energy Harvesters Based on Piezoceramic Films. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2020, 70, 1500109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Guiffard, B.; Seveno, R. Piezoelectric response of a PZT thin film to magnetic fields from permanent magnet and coil combination. Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 2015, 118, 225–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Chuo, Y.; Landrock, C.; Omrane, B.; Aristizabal, J.; Patel, J.N.; Marzencki, M.; Kaminska, B. Towards self-powering touch/flex-sensitive OLED systems. IEEE Sens. J. 2011, 11, 2771–2779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Xia, K.; Xu, Z. Double-piezoelectric-layer-enhanced triboelectric nanogenerator for bio-mechanical energy harvesting and hot airflow monitoring. Smart Mater. Struct. 2020, 29, 095016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Tabhane, G.H.; Giripunje, S.M. Robust flower-like ZnO assembled β-PVDF/BT hybrid nanocomposite: Excellent energy harvester. Polym. Test. 2020, 88, 106564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. de-J. Lozoya-Santos, J.; Félix-Herrán, L.C.; Tudón-Martínez, J.C.; Vargas-Martinez, A.; Ramirez-Mendoza, R.A. Design and implementation of an iot-oriented strain smart sensor with exploratory capabilities on energy harvesting and magnetorheological elastomer transducers. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 4387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Dietze, M.; Es-Souni, M. Large Area Thick Films of PVDF-TrFE and Relaxor-Ceramics for Piezo- and Pyroelectric Applications. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2019, 304, 1900538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. He, S.; Guo, Y.; Guo, R.; Fu, X.; Guan, L.; Liu, H. Piezoelectric Nanogenerators Based on Self-Poled Two-Dimensional Li-Doped ZnO Microdisks. J. Electron. Mater. 2019, 48, 2886–2894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Bodnariuk, M.; Melentiev, R. Bibliometric analysis of micro-nano manufacturing technologies. Nanotechnol. Precis. Eng. 2020, 2, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Zhang, L.; Geng, Y.; Zhong, Y.; Dong, H.; Liu, Z. A bibliometric analysis on waste electrical and electronic equipment research. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2019, 26, 21098–21108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Weddell, A.S.; Merrett, G.V.; Barrow, S.; Al-Hashimi, B.M. Vibration-powered sensing system for engine condition monitoring. In Proceedings of the IET Conference on Wireless Sensor Systems (WSS 2012), London, UK, 18–19 June 2012. [Google Scholar]
  137. Pesta, B.; Fuerst, J.; Kirkegaard, E.O.W. Bibliometric Keyword Analysis across Seventeen Years (2000–2016) of Intelligence Articles. J. Intell. 2018, 6, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Chen, G.; Xiao, L. Selecting publication keywords for domain analysis in bibliometrics: A comparison of three methods. J. Informetr. 2016, 10, 212–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Calautit, K.; Nasir, D.S.N.M.; Hughes, B.R. Low power energy harvesting systems: State of the art and future challenges. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 147, 111230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Bai, S.; Liu, C. Overview of energy harvesting and emission reduction technologies in hybrid electric vehicles. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 147, 111188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Koohi-Kamali, S.; Tyagi, V.V.; Rahim, N.A.; Panwar, N.L.; Mokhlis, H. Emergence of energy storage technologies as the solution for reliable operation of smart power systems: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 25, 135–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Paul, S.; Lee, D.; Kim, K.; Chang, J. Nonlinear modeling and performance testing of high-power electromagnetic energy harvesting system for self-powering transmission line vibration deicing robot. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2021, 151, 107369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Mohamed, R.; Sarker, M.R.; Mohamed, A. An optimization of rectangular shape piezoelectric energy harvesting cantilever beam for micro devices. Int. J. Appl. Electromagn. Mech. 2016, 50, 537–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Sarker, M.R.; Mohamed, A.; Mohamed, R. Develop a vibration based MEMS piezoelectric energy harvester using micro cantilever beam. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 2016, 11, 3421–3426. [Google Scholar]
  145. Shi, G.; Tong, D.; Xia, Y.; Jia, S.; Chang, J.; Li, Q.; Wang, X.; Xia, H.; Ye, Y. A piezoelectric vibration energy harvester for multi-directional and ultra-low frequency waves with magnetic coupling driven by rotating balls. Appl. Energy 2022, 310, 118511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Khazaee, M.; Rezaniakolaie, A.; Rosendahl, L. A broadband macro-fiber-composite piezoelectric energy harvester for higher energy conversion from practical wideband vibrations. Nano Energy 2020, 76, 104978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Weddell, A.S.; Zhu, D.; Merrett, G.V.; Beeby, S.P.; Al-Hashimi, B.M. Demo abstract: Tunable vibration energy harvester. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Energy Neutral Sensing Systems, New York, NY, USA, 13 November 2013. [Google Scholar]
  148. Sarker, M.R.; Mohamed, A.; Mohamed, R. Cantilever beam vibration from fluid interactions with triangular shape blunt body for energy harvesting application. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD 2015), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 13–14 December 2015. [Google Scholar]
  149. Satyanarayana, T.; Nikhitha, Y.; Neeraj Kumar, C.; Jeevan Naga Sai, K.; Lohitha, V. Optimization of bimorph cantilever based piezoelectric energy harvester for high efficiency. Mater. Today Proc. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Greeshma, M.G.; Prabha Rajeev, S. Optimising proof mass for cantilever based piezoelectric energy harvester. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 59, 623–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Wang, J.; Xiao, F.; Zhao, H. Thermoelectric, piezoelectric and photovoltaic harvesting technologies for pavement engineering. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 151, 111522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Junior, P.A.F.; Campos, F. de S.; Castro, B.A. de; Ulson, J.A.C.; Baptista, F.G.; Andreoli, A.L. Low-Cost Piezoelectric Sensor Characterization for Energy Harvesting Applications. Multidiscip. Digit. Publ. Inst. Proc. 2018, 4, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Sezer, N.; Koç, M. A comprehensive review on the state-of-the-art of piezoelectric energy harvesting. Nano Energy 2021, 80, 105567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Priya, S.; Song, H.-C.; Zhou, Y.; Varghese, R.; Chopra, A.; Kim, S.-G.; Kanno, I.; Wu, L.; Ha, D.S.; Ryu, J.; et al. A Review on Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting: Materials, Methods, and Circuits. Energy Harvest. Syst. 2017, 4, 3–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Covaci, C.; Gontean, A. Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting Solutions: A Review. Sensors 2020, 20, 3512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Yang, Z.; Zhou, S.; Zu, J.; Inman, D. High-Performance Piezoelectric Energy Harvesters and Their Applications. Joule 2018, 2, 642–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Gomez, A.; Lagadec, M.F.; Magno, M.; Benini, L. Self-powered wireless sensor nodes for monitoring radioactivity in contaminated areas using unmanned aerial vehicles. In Proceeding of the 2015 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS), Zadar, Croatia, 13–15 April 2015. [Google Scholar]
  158. Liu, Y.-P.; Vasic, D. Self-Powered Electronics for Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting Devices. Small-Scale Energy Harvest. 2012, 323, 112641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Tan, T.; Zuo, L.; Yan, Z. Environment coupled piezoelectric galloping wind energy harvesting. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2021, 323, 112641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Cook-Chennault, K.A.; Thambi, N.; Bitetto, M.A.; Hameyie, E.B. Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting: A Green and Clean Alternative for Sustained Power Production. Bull. Sci. 2008, 28, 496–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Sodano, H.A.; Park, G.; Leo, D.J.; Inman, D.J. Use of piezoelectric energy harvesting devices for charging batteries. In Smart Structures and Materials 2003: Smart Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2003; p. 101. [Google Scholar]
  162. Merrett, G.V.; Weddell, A.S. Supercapacitor leakage in energy-harvesting sensor nodes: Fact or fiction? In Proceedings of the 2012 Ninth International Conference on Networked Sensing (INSS), Antwerp, Belgium, 11–14 June 2012. [Google Scholar]
  163. Kordmahale, S.B.; Do, J.; Chang, K.A.; Kameoka, J. Low Cost and Piezoelectric based Soft Wave Energy Harvester. MRS Adv. 2019, 4, 889–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Cao, S.; Li, J. A survey on ambient energy sources and harvesting methods for structural health monitoring applications. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2017, 9, 1687814017696210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Azam, H.; Hanif, N.H.H.M.; Ralib, A.A.M. Magnetically induced piezoelectric energy harvester via hybrid kinetic motion. IIUM Eng. J. 2019, 20, 245–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Block diagram of the reviewing methodology for overall article selection process.
Figure 1. Block diagram of the reviewing methodology for overall article selection process.
Micromachines 13 00975 g001
Figure 2. The frequency of manuscripts per year.
Figure 2. The frequency of manuscripts per year.
Micromachines 13 00975 g002
Figure 3. Before scanning the frequency of published manuscripts per year.
Figure 3. Before scanning the frequency of published manuscripts per year.
Micromachines 13 00975 g003
Figure 4. Distribution of 100 top-cited manuscripts from the year 2010 to 2021.
Figure 4. Distribution of 100 top-cited manuscripts from the year 2010 to 2021.
Micromachines 13 00975 g004
Figure 5. Top 5 research areas in piezoelectric energy harvester for low-power application.
Figure 5. Top 5 research areas in piezoelectric energy harvester for low-power application.
Micromachines 13 00975 g005
Figure 6. The country’s networks in the research of PMEH with low-cost applications.
Figure 6. The country’s networks in the research of PMEH with low-cost applications.
Micromachines 13 00975 g006
Figure 7. Articles for (a) journal analysis, (b) impact factor, and (c) publishers.
Figure 7. Articles for (a) journal analysis, (b) impact factor, and (c) publishers.
Micromachines 13 00975 g007aMicromachines 13 00975 g007bMicromachines 13 00975 g007c
Figure 8. Network mapping of authors with a high frequency of manuscripts.
Figure 8. Network mapping of authors with a high frequency of manuscripts.
Micromachines 13 00975 g008
Figure 9. Visualization for the keywords.
Figure 9. Visualization for the keywords.
Micromachines 13 00975 g009
Figure 10. Common keywords analysis topics for 100 papers.
Figure 10. Common keywords analysis topics for 100 papers.
Micromachines 13 00975 g010
Table 1. Summarized analytical evaluation of review manuscripts.
Table 1. Summarized analytical evaluation of review manuscripts.
ReferencesYearFocused TopicsResearch Gaps
[22]2021A bibliometric analysis on Pediatric Surgery is presented where articles from Web of Science within the years 1986 to 2012 are considered.Keyword analysis and recent articles were not included in the top 100 most-cited articles.
[12]2021Top 100 most-cited articles on dentistry were presented.The keyword analysis, as well as the most popular terms utilized in various years, recent important papers, and study types were not addressed.
[14]2020A bibliometric analysis is presented in the field of medical imaging where Scopus and Web of Science database were used to extract articles.Because the average citation per year was not taken into account, no recent articles were considered for the analysis.
[23]2020100 most-cited articles in the field of general thoracic surgery are extracted from Web of Science database.A detailed surveying approach is described, but there is no list of keywords from various years or keyword analysis.
[24]2021A detail bibliometric analysis of battery thermal management systems is presented, including a detail keyword analysis, surveying methodology and discussion.The selected list of papers with the most citations was missing. Furthermore, research gaps in the field of studies, as well as contemporary trends are not taken into account.
[25]2021A bibliometric analysis on battery storage systems with renewable energy integration is presented and the articles were extracted from Scopus database.The research gaps, concerns, and challenges of the subject of study are not explored, but a detailed keyword analysis, surveying technique, and recent research trends are mentioned.
Table 2. Potential of articles in the Scopus database.
Table 2. Potential of articles in the Scopus database.
StagesFilterKeyword CodesNumber of Manuscripts
1st stageEnergy harvesting system for low-power applicationsTITLE-ABS-KEY (energy AND harvesting AND system AND for AND low AND power AND applications)2549
2nd stageLow-cost energy harvesting system for low-power applicationsTITLE-ABS-KEY (low AND cost AND energy AND harvesting AND system AND for AND low AND power AND applications)551
3rd stagePiezoelectric energy harvesting system for low-cost applications(Piezoelectric AND energy AND harvesting AND for AND low AND cost AND applications)201
4th stageYear range (2010–2021)TITLE-ABS-KEY (piezoelectric AND energy AND harvesting AND for AND low AND cost AND applications) AND (LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2021) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2020) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2019) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2018) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2017) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2016) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2015) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2014) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2013) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2012) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2011) OR LIMIT-TO (PUBYEAR, 2010)) AND (LIMIT-TO (EXACTKEYWORD, “Energy Harvesting”) OR LIMIT-TO (EXACTKEYWORD, “Piezoelectricity”) OR LIMIT-TO (EXACTKEYWORD, “Piezoelectric”) OR LIMIT-TO (EXACTKEYWORD, “Costs”) OR LIMIT-TO (EXACTKEYWORD, “Piezoelectric Energy Harvesters”) OR LIMIT-TO (EXACTKEYWORD, “Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting”) OR LIMIT-TO (EXACTKEYWORD, “Sensors”) OR LIMIT-TO (EXACTKEYWORD, “Low Costs”) OR LIMIT-TO (EXACTKEYWORD, “Low Power Electronics”))189
Table 4. Top 10 authors with the highest number of manuscripts in this area.
Table 4. Top 10 authors with the highest number of manuscripts in this area.
RankAuthor NameCurrent InstitutionCountryNo. of ArticlesNo. of Citationsh-Index
1Magno, M.ETH ZürichSwitzerland8315233
2Tentzeris, M.M.Georgia Institute of TechnologyUSA716,74962
3Wang, Z.L.Georgia Institute of TechnologyUSA7239,581240
4Pelrine, R.SRI InternationalUSA510,18436
5Benini, L.Alma Mater Studiorum Università di BolognaItaly431,88181
6Eckerle, J.SRI InternationalUSA4182514
7Georgiadis, A.Heriot-Watt UniversityUK4538434
8Kim, S.Pusan National UniversitySouth Korea4162018
9KornbluhSRI InternationalUSA410,02335
10Prahlad, H.SRI InternationalUSA4132719
Table 5. Top 10 affiliations in PMEH for low-power applications research (2010–2021).
Table 5. Top 10 affiliations in PMEH for low-power applications research (2010–2021).
NoAuthor InstitutionsFrequency of Articles
1Laboratoire de G & eacute; nie Electrique et Ferro & eacute; lectricit & eacute6
2Jeju National University5
3Università degli Studi di Catania4
4University of Florida4
5Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon4
6Georgia Institute of Technology4
7Jadavpur University4
8University of Michigan, Ann Arbor4
9Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University4
10Université Chouaib Doukkali4
Table 6. Top ten articles based on “highest citation in the last 5 years from 2017 to 2021.
Table 6. Top ten articles based on “highest citation in the last 5 years from 2017 to 2021.
RankAuthor NameArticle TitleLast 5 Years’ CitationTotal
Citation
Rank
ACYAdvantageContributionResearch Gap
1Chang, C., Tran, V.H., Wang, J., Fuh, Y.K., Lin, L.Direct-write piezoelectric polymeric nanogenerator with high energy conversion efficiency5122103PVDF nanofibers have good piezoelectric effect as compared to polyethylene oxides.Under mechanical stretching the output is repeatable and constant with good efficiency.Evaporation is a big problem.
2Mao, Y., Zhang, J., Letaief, K.B.Dynamic Computation Offloading for Mobile-Edge Computing with Energy Harvesting Devices8391168Proposed algorithm shows remarkable results.For offloading, Lyapunov optimization-based dynamic computation algorithm is introduced.The central processing unit-cycle frequency is an important parameter to be controlled.
3Jang, S.; Jo, H.; Cho, S.; Mechitov, K.; Rice, J.A.; Sim, S.H.; Jung, H.J.; Yun, C.B.; Spencer, B.F.; Agha, G.Structural health monitoring of a cable-stayed bridge using smart sensor technology: Deployment and evaluation166533Wireless smart sensors help to monitor the civil structures for long periods.Efficient data management and low cost of monitoring.70 sensors and 2 base stations are used; the number should be reduced.
4Dong, Z.; Kennedy, S.J.; Wu, Y.Electrospinning materials for energy-related applications and devices151730Introduction of electro spinning in EH.The utilization of electro-spinning to generate materials for four main energy-related applications is highlighted in this paper: (1) fuel cells, (2) dye-sensitized solar cells, (3) Li-ion batteries, and (4) supercapacitors.Attention is still required in the case of new materials.
5Fan, X.; Chen, J.; Yang, J.; Bai, P.; Li, Z.; Wang, Z.L.Ultrathin, rollable, paper-based triboelectric nanogenerator for acoustic energy harvesting and self-powered sound recording219444A self-powered microphone for sound recording with rolled structure is exhibited for all-sound recording without angular dependence, with the advantages of a large working bandwidth, thin structure, and flexibility.The triboelectric nanogenerator may be installed on a commercial mobile phone to collect acoustic energy from human speech and use the generated power to charge a capacitor at a rate of 0.144 V/s.Noise reduction is a problem.
6Hu, Y.; Wang, Z.L.Recent progress in piezoelectric nanogenerators as a sustainable power source in self-powered systems and active sensors200340The nanogenerator can be utilized as a sustainable power source for self-powered systems and as active sensors, which are two major applications of this technology. Several demos are discussed in this article.Using ZnO nanowires and a new sandwich structure design, a high-performance piezoelectric nanogenerator may be made in a very simple fabrication procedure with good mechanical stability.High cost
7Martinez, B.; Montón, M.; Vilajosana, I.; Prades, J.D.The Power of Models: Modeling Power Consumption for IoT Devices161632This research gives a thorough model for wireless sensor-node power consumption.This paper introduces a novel paradigm for investigating and assessing energy life cycles in applications. It may be used to predict the precise weight of application parameters in advance, as well as to comprehend the system’s tolerance margins and tradeoffs.Only deals with parameters that could be empirically quantified.
8Lee, S.; Bae, S.H.; Lin, L.; Yang, Y.; Park, C.; Kim, S.W.; Cha, S.N.; Kim, H.; Park, Y.J.; Wang, Z.L.Super-flexible nanogenerator for energy harvesting from gentle wind and as an active deformation sensor1151023Nanogenerator (NG) with max. output voltage.This paper describes a super-flexible and conformable NG based on low-cost thin Al-foil electrodes that can not only collect energy from a waving flag but also detect a moving object; when linked to a human face, the skin moves.Highly flexible material is used.
9Garain, S.; Jana, S.; Sinha, T.K.; Mandal, D.Design of in Situ Poled Ce3+-Doped Electrospun PVDF/Graphene Composite Nanofibers for Fabrication of Nanopressure Sensor and Ultrasensitive Acoustic Nanogenerator138828 Design of efficient ultrasensitive acoustic-nanogenerator.
10Thielen, M.; Sigrist, L.; Magno, M.; Hierold, C.; Benini, L.Human body heat for powering wearable devices: From thermal energy to application124925Energy harvester for wearable devices.This research investigates scavenging human body heat and improving the efficiency of power conversion from the body core to the application.Requires critical power conditioning.
Table 7. Highly cited manuscripts in Scopus database.
Table 7. Highly cited manuscripts in Scopus database.
Types of StudyFrequencyRange of YearsCitation Range
Mathematical modelling, algorithm creation, data collection and simulation for energy harvesting922010–20213–992
Energy harvesting through piezoelectric material synthesized for low-cost applications772010–20213–992
Optimization techniques for sizing, low-cost control, low-cost devices, and low-cost electronics602010–20213–992
Review (surveys, critical, state-of-the-art strategic–technical)172011–20213–352
Development, evaluation, and experimental prototype low-cost sensors142010–20213–355
Table 8. A total of 50 manuscripts with highest citations in various fields of research.
Table 8. A total of 50 manuscripts with highest citations in various fields of research.
Subject AreaRank of the Manuscript According to Table 3Publication RateCitation Range
Energy-harvesting system[31,32,34,35,36,37,44,45,46,47,48,51,52,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,84,85,86,87]4420–992
Piezoelectric energy harvesting[31,35,37,45,46,49,50,53,55,56,57,59,60,62,65,68,69,70,72,73,75,76,78,79,81,82,83,84,85,86,87]3120–992
Energy harvesting for low-cost applications[34,35,44,47,50,51,61,72,73,74,81,82,83,84]1123–352
Energy harvesting for low-cost acquisition[31,52,53,55,57,58,60,62,66,67,68,69,71,75,76,79,86,87]1820–992
Energy harvesting for low-cost sensors[34,37,45,48,56,58,65,68,70,74,77,78]1033–355
Energy harvesting for low-cost electronics[32,36,44,47,63,77,80,85]820–844
Energy harvesting for low-cost control[54,64]254–85
Energy harvesting for low-power devices[32,34,44,47,48,50,51,54,57,59,61,63,64,65,67,71,74,76,78,82]2024–844
Table 9. Relevant 13 most common keywords used in different articles from the year 2010 to 2021.
Table 9. Relevant 13 most common keywords used in different articles from the year 2010 to 2021.
RankKeywords201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
1Energy Harvesting[31,34,51][35,103,128][52,64,93,94,110][45,70][37,56,75,76,78,97][36,44,58,61,67,71,77,87,115,122,127][7,32,46,59,96,100,109,116][47,57,62,79,84,102,108][48,55,63,65,66,68,69,86,88,89,92,99,121][72,74,80,85,91,95,98,101,107,114,120,132,133][3,60,82,83,90,105,111,112,113,119,124,126,129,131][1,4,81,104,106,117,118,125]
2Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting[31][35,103,128][50,73,93,94,110][45,70][37,56,75,76,78,97][87,115,122,127][7,46,59,96,100,109,116][49,57,62,79,84,102,108][53,55,65,68,69,86,88,89,92,99,121][72,80,85,91,95,98,101,107,114,120,132,133][3,60,82,83,90,105,111,112,113,119,124,126,129,131][81,104,106,117,125]
3Low-Cost Acquisition[31] [52] [75,76][58,61,67,71,87,122][96,109][57,62,79,108][53,55,66,68,69,86][101,107,114,120,133][60,90,105,112,119,129][106]
4Low-Cost Electronics [36,44,77][32][47][63,121][80,85,98][126,131][4]
5Low-Cost Sensors[34][103][93,94][45,70][37,56,78] [59] [48,65][132][124][104,118]
6Low-Cost Applications[51][35,128][50,73] [97][115,127][100][84,102][88,89,99,121][72,74,91,95][3,82,83,111,119][81,117,125]
7Low-Cost Control [64,110] [7,116][54] [1]
8WSN[34] [36,44,115,122] [48,66][72,74][124][1,4]
9Vibration [64] [71,77,122] [84] [107,114][126][106]
10Optimization [7,116][47] [72]
11Sensors [128][73] [58,87][46,100][49,54][86,89][91][83,129][104]
12Low-power devices[34,51] [50,52,64][45,70][37,76,78][36,44,58,61,67,71,122][7,32,46,59,100][47,49,54,57][48,53,63,65,69,92,99][74,85,98,101,120][1,3,82,112,113,126,129,131][118,125]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sarker, M.R.; Saad, M.H.M.; Riaz, A.; Lipu, M.S.H.; Olazagoitia, J.L.; Arshad, H. A Bibliometric Analysis of Low-Cost Piezoelectric Micro-Energy Harvesting Systems from Ambient Energy Sources: Current Trends, Issues and Suggestions. Micromachines 2022, 13, 975. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13060975

AMA Style

Sarker MR, Saad MHM, Riaz A, Lipu MSH, Olazagoitia JL, Arshad H. A Bibliometric Analysis of Low-Cost Piezoelectric Micro-Energy Harvesting Systems from Ambient Energy Sources: Current Trends, Issues and Suggestions. Micromachines. 2022; 13(6):975. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13060975

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sarker, Mahidur R., Mohamad Hanif Md Saad, Amna Riaz, M. S. Hossain Lipu, José Luis Olazagoitia, and Haslina Arshad. 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Low-Cost Piezoelectric Micro-Energy Harvesting Systems from Ambient Energy Sources: Current Trends, Issues and Suggestions" Micromachines 13, no. 6: 975. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13060975

APA Style

Sarker, M. R., Saad, M. H. M., Riaz, A., Lipu, M. S. H., Olazagoitia, J. L., & Arshad, H. (2022). A Bibliometric Analysis of Low-Cost Piezoelectric Micro-Energy Harvesting Systems from Ambient Energy Sources: Current Trends, Issues and Suggestions. Micromachines, 13(6), 975. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13060975

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop