Next Article in Journal
Structural Colors on Al Surface via Capped Cu-Si3N4 Bilayer Structure
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of an Optoelectronic Integrated Sensor for a MEMS Mirror-Based Active Structured Light System
Previous Article in Journal
A Reliability System Evaluation Model of NoC Communication with Crosstalk Analysis from Backend to Frontend
Previous Article in Special Issue
AlScN Piezoelectric MEMS Mirrors with Large Field of View for LiDAR Application
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Micromachines
Volume 14
Issue 2
10.3390/mi14020470
Review Report
micromachines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Review
Peer-Review Record

MEMS Enabled Miniature Two-Photon Microscopy for Biomedical Imaging

Micromachines 2023, 14(2), 470; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14020470
by Xiaomin Yu 1, Liang Zhou 2, Tingxiang Qi 3, Hui Zhao 3,4 and Huikai Xie 3,4,5,*
Reviewer 2:
Yew Hoong Wong
Micromachines 2023, 14(2), 470; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14020470
Submission received: 22 January 2023 / Revised: 7 February 2023 / Accepted: 7 February 2023 / Published: 17 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Optical MEMS, Volume III)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Some of the figures are blurred. This is a review paper, i guess you can ask the original authors of the papers to provide high resolution figures. Thanks,

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Journal: Micromachines

Manuscript ID: micromachines 2205811
Type of manuscript: Review
Title: MEMS Enabled Miniature Two-Photon Microscopy

 

Comments:

X. Yu et al have reviewed comprehensively on the MEMS-based two-photon microscopy (TPM) for clinical imaging applications. Generally, the contents of the review are fine technically.  However, there are a few points that need to be addressed accordingly before acceptance and published by Micromachines journal. Please find the comments below:

1.     “MEMS” in the title should be spelled in complete term, not abbreviated term. Please amend accordingly. Also, the overall review and discussion focus on clinical applications, thus the term “clinical applications” could be included in the title as well. The suggested title could be “Microelectromechanical System (MEMS) Enabled Miniature Two-Photon Microscopy”.

2.     Novelty and significance of manuscript: I find that the authors did not highlight the novelty and significance of manuscript to demonstrate the worthiness of publishing this manuscript in the introduction part. The current version did not portray the significance of this review. Are there reviews pertaining to this topic? If yes, what is / are the difference(s) of this review versus others?

3.     What is the outlook or future research directions of MEMS-based TPM? It is highly suggested to include a dedicated section of this aspect, prior to the conclusion.

4.     English language and grammar problems: I suggest the authors to check the English language and grammar by native English speakers. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop