Author Contributions
Conceptualization, Z.Y. and L.Z; methodology, L.Z. and Q.Z.; software, Z.Y.; validation, Z.Y., Q.Z. and J.Z.; formal analysis, K.Z.; investigation, Z.Y., L.Z. and J.Z; resources, J.Z.; data curation, Z.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.Y. and L.Z.; writing—review and editing, L.Z. and J.Z.; visualization, K.Z.; supervision, J.Z.; project administration, L.Z.; funding acquisition, L.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Figure 1.
Illustration of the of the proposed power combiner.
Figure 1.
Illustration of the of the proposed power combiner.
Figure 2.
Profile view of the power combiner: (a) overall sectional structure and (b) transition structure of the power combiner. The green area represents the medium within the joint, while the gray area represents the metal. (a) displays the parameters for the radial line waveguide and coaxial waveguide in the proposed combiner and the transition structure connecting them. (b) provides a more detailed view of this transition structure and its parameters.
Figure 2.
Profile view of the power combiner: (a) overall sectional structure and (b) transition structure of the power combiner. The green area represents the medium within the joint, while the gray area represents the metal. (a) displays the parameters for the radial line waveguide and coaxial waveguide in the proposed combiner and the transition structure connecting them. (b) provides a more detailed view of this transition structure and its parameters.
Figure 3.
Structure of the input side: (a) N-type RF coaxial connector and (b) profile view. (The joint’s medium is represented in green, the internal channel of the combiner (also the electromagnetic wave transmission area) in blue, and the metal region in gray. (a) shows an input connector model, while (b) is a cross-section of all input connectors within the combiner).
Figure 3.
Structure of the input side: (a) N-type RF coaxial connector and (b) profile view. (The joint’s medium is represented in green, the internal channel of the combiner (also the electromagnetic wave transmission area) in blue, and the metal region in gray. (a) shows an input connector model, while (b) is a cross-section of all input connectors within the combiner).
Figure 4.
Profile view of the input side. This diagram shows the transitional internal space channel at one of the combiner’s inputs and how it connects to the radial line waveguide. Other input ports on the combiner are evenly distributed around the outside of the waveguide in this particular model.
Figure 4.
Profile view of the input side. This diagram shows the transitional internal space channel at one of the combiner’s inputs and how it connects to the radial line waveguide. Other input ports on the combiner are evenly distributed around the outside of the waveguide in this particular model.
Figure 5.
Structure of the model converter: (a) perspective view and (b) profile view. The proposed mode converter is shown in (a), with the blue section representing the internal spatial channel for electromagnetic wave transmission and the gray area describing the metal. (b) shows a cross-sectional view of the mode converter, including all structural parameters.
Figure 5.
Structure of the model converter: (a) perspective view and (b) profile view. The proposed mode converter is shown in (a), with the blue section representing the internal spatial channel for electromagnetic wave transmission and the gray area describing the metal. (b) shows a cross-sectional view of the mode converter, including all structural parameters.
Figure 6.
Results of S-parameter simulation of the power combiner. The figure shows the frequency on the horizontal axis and the S-parameter simulation result of the combiner on the vertical axis. For the 1:16 power divider/combiner simulation, the ideal single-way transmission coefficient Sn,1 is approximately −12.04 dB, calculated as 10 log (1/16). During simulation, when Port1’s reflection coefficient S11 is better than −20 dB, transmission coefficient S21~S17,1 will be around −12.04 dB due to the combiner’s excellent symmetry, while good power distribution/synthesis can be realized.
Figure 6.
Results of S-parameter simulation of the power combiner. The figure shows the frequency on the horizontal axis and the S-parameter simulation result of the combiner on the vertical axis. For the 1:16 power divider/combiner simulation, the ideal single-way transmission coefficient Sn,1 is approximately −12.04 dB, calculated as 10 log (1/16). During simulation, when Port1’s reflection coefficient S11 is better than −20 dB, transmission coefficient S21~S17,1 will be around −12.04 dB due to the combiner’s excellent symmetry, while good power distribution/synthesis can be realized.
Figure 7.
Cold tests: (a) the block diagram and (b) a snapshot of the experimental setup. The output port of the combiner is connected to a mode converter (WR340~N-type RF coaxial) and then to port 1 of the network analyzer. Fifteen output ports of the combiner are connected to the standard 50 Ω matched load, and the remaining port X to be tested is connected to the network analyzer port 2. The transmission coefficients and phases of the 16 input ports are measured sequentially in the experiment.
Figure 7.
Cold tests: (a) the block diagram and (b) a snapshot of the experimental setup. The output port of the combiner is connected to a mode converter (WR340~N-type RF coaxial) and then to port 1 of the network analyzer. Fifteen output ports of the combiner are connected to the standard 50 Ω matched load, and the remaining port X to be tested is connected to the network analyzer port 2. The transmission coefficients and phases of the 16 input ports are measured sequentially in the experiment.
Figure 8.
Results of S-parameter measurements: (a) S-parameter measurement results within a wide frequency band range and (b) transmission coefficients measured. It is seen from (a) that the reflection S11 is less than −20 dB in the range of 2.065–2.93 GHz. (b) shows the measured transmission coefficient Sn,1 from port 2~17 to port 1. The transmission coefficients of the 16 ports are distributed within a narrow range around −12 dB.
Figure 8.
Results of S-parameter measurements: (a) S-parameter measurement results within a wide frequency band range and (b) transmission coefficients measured. It is seen from (a) that the reflection S11 is less than −20 dB in the range of 2.065–2.93 GHz. (b) shows the measured transmission coefficient Sn,1 from port 2~17 to port 1. The transmission coefficients of the 16 ports are distributed within a narrow range around −12 dB.
Figure 9.
Phase measured (the figure shows the measured transmission phase from port 2~17 to port 1).
Figure 9.
Phase measured (the figure shows the measured transmission phase from port 2~17 to port 1).
Figure 10.
Block diagram of the experimental setup. A high-power CW RF source is connected to combiner 1 and combiner 2. The former here is used as a power divider, to divide the input microwave signal into 16 ways, which are subsequently connected to the inputs of combiner 2 through coaxial cables. Power meters 1 and 2 are attached to the coupling Port A of coupler 1 and Port B of coupler 2, respectively, to measure the coupled input and output power (the microwave energy is relatively low and falls within the power measurement range of the power meter). The load is employed to absorb the high-power microwave energy output from the straight-through end of coupler 2, thereby preventing any potential damage to other devices. In addition, a temperature sensor is connected to the combiner’s outer surface to record the device’s temperature.
Figure 10.
Block diagram of the experimental setup. A high-power CW RF source is connected to combiner 1 and combiner 2. The former here is used as a power divider, to divide the input microwave signal into 16 ways, which are subsequently connected to the inputs of combiner 2 through coaxial cables. Power meters 1 and 2 are attached to the coupling Port A of coupler 1 and Port B of coupler 2, respectively, to measure the coupled input and output power (the microwave energy is relatively low and falls within the power measurement range of the power meter). The load is employed to absorb the high-power microwave energy output from the straight-through end of coupler 2, thereby preventing any potential damage to other devices. In addition, a temperature sensor is connected to the combiner’s outer surface to record the device’s temperature.
Figure 11.
The insertion loss and P-point temperature of the combiner vs. time, for a power of 2700 W in the power combiner. The horizontal axis represents the time of power injection to the combiner. The left vertical axis indicates the insertion loss of the device, and the right vertical axis is the temperature at point P indicated in the right panel.
Figure 11.
The insertion loss and P-point temperature of the combiner vs. time, for a power of 2700 W in the power combiner. The horizontal axis represents the time of power injection to the combiner. The left vertical axis indicates the insertion loss of the device, and the right vertical axis is the temperature at point P indicated in the right panel.
Figure 12.
Relationship between insertion loss and temperature of the device (this graph shows how the insertion loss of the combiner changes with the temperature; the horizontal axis represents the temperature, while the vertical axis represents the insertion loss).
Figure 12.
Relationship between insertion loss and temperature of the device (this graph shows how the insertion loss of the combiner changes with the temperature; the horizontal axis represents the temperature, while the vertical axis represents the insertion loss).
Figure 13.
Simulated steady-state temperature distribution of the combiner subjected to 3000 W CW injection at 2.45 GHz. In the simulation process, for the purpose of enhancing the stringency of simulation conditions, the convective heat transfer coefficient between the metal and air was adjusted to 5 W/(m2·K), and the thermal conductivity of the 6061 aluminum alloy was configured to 155 W/(m2·K). The displayed results were obtained with electromagnetic and thermal multiphysics field simulation. Since in experiments of high-power operation, it was observed that the inner conductor of the input port connector exhibited the highest temperature, while the outer surface of the waveguide showed the lowest temperature, which is consistent with the simulated results above, one can believe that by measuring the temperature at point P, it is possible to estimate the highest temperature point of the combiner.
Figure 13.
Simulated steady-state temperature distribution of the combiner subjected to 3000 W CW injection at 2.45 GHz. In the simulation process, for the purpose of enhancing the stringency of simulation conditions, the convective heat transfer coefficient between the metal and air was adjusted to 5 W/(m2·K), and the thermal conductivity of the 6061 aluminum alloy was configured to 155 W/(m2·K). The displayed results were obtained with electromagnetic and thermal multiphysics field simulation. Since in experiments of high-power operation, it was observed that the inner conductor of the input port connector exhibited the highest temperature, while the outer surface of the waveguide showed the lowest temperature, which is consistent with the simulated results above, one can believe that by measuring the temperature at point P, it is possible to estimate the highest temperature point of the combiner.
Figure 14.
The P-point temperature of the combiner vs. input power. The stabilized temperatures at point P of the combiner under various power conditions are shown in the figure. It is seen that the stabilized temperature increases monotonically with respect to the input power.
Figure 14.
The P-point temperature of the combiner vs. input power. The stabilized temperatures at point P of the combiner under various power conditions are shown in the figure. It is seen that the stabilized temperature increases monotonically with respect to the input power.
Table 1.
Structure parameter of power combiner.
Table 1.
Structure parameter of power combiner.
Parameters | R | H | R1 | R2 | A | B | C | D |
Values/mm | 60.8 | 10.0 | 4.1 | 14.3 | 33.9 | 20.8 | 18.1 | 50.0 |
Parameters | L | R5 | H1 | L1 | W | T | r | |
Values/mm | 11.6 | 40.0 | 33.0 | 44.3 | 63.0 | 9.4 | 2 | |