Next Article in Journal
Gold Nanoparticle-Modified Carbon-Fiber Microelectrodes for the Electrochemical Detection of Cd2+ via Fast-Scan Cyclic Voltammetry
Previous Article in Journal
Cooling Performance Prediction of Particle-Based Radiative Cooling Film Considering Particle Size Distribution
Previous Article in Special Issue
Increasing the Light Extraction Efficiency of Organic Light-Emitting Devices by Electrochemically Corroded Patterned Substrates
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Excitation of Terahertz Spoof Surface Plasmons on a Roofed Metallic Grating by an Electron Beam

Micromachines 2024, 15(3), 293; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15030293
by Yongqiang Liu *, Xutao Zhang, Yan Wang, He Cai, Jinhai Sun, Yong Zhu and Liangsheng Li
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Micromachines 2024, 15(3), 293; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15030293
Submission received: 30 December 2023 / Revised: 5 February 2024 / Accepted: 7 February 2024 / Published: 21 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Integrated Photonics and Optoelectronics)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This paper presents a thorough examination and investigation of the fundamental SSP modes on roofed metallic gratings and their effective excitation by an injected electron beam in the THz regime. The introduction of the roofed metallic grating allows for the generation of a closed waveguide mode outside the light line, while the bounded SSP mode line shifts to lower frequencies. The effective excitation of the bounded SSP mode on the roofed metallic grating is studied using a particle-in-cell simulation studio, and the resulting SSP power spectra with various gap sizes are obtained and analyzed. The simulation results indicate a slight red shift in the generated SSP spectra with decreasing gap size. This research on the excitation of SSP mode by an electron beam has implications for the development of high-power compact THz radiation sources, leveraging the strong near-field confinement of SSPs on metallic gratings.

I think this work is interesting and should be accepted asap.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

English need be more simple

Author Response

Thanks for you comments.

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

As the reported paper is purely simulation, authors should reflect this in the title by adding "Theoretical Study" or "Simulation" words.

In Figure 2 (a) insert, g=80um is written. In the Figure caption, it mentioned 84um. Which one is the correct?

I have no other comments other than the above 2.

Author Response

Thanks for your report.

We have changed 84um to 80 in the figure caption.  The title is too long if we add "simulated study". So, in the Abstract, "numerically" is added according to your suggestions.

Back to TopTop