Next Article in Journal
1.3 Micron Photodetectors Enabled by the SPARK Effect
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancing Single-Mode Characteristics and Reducing Confinement Loss in Liquid-Core Anti-Resonant Fibers via Selective Filling and Geometrical Optimization
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhanced DMA Test Procedure to Measure Viscoelastic Properties of Epoxy-Based Molding Compound: Multiple Oscillatory Strain Amplitudes and Monotonic Loading
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Wafer Bonding of GaAs and SiC via Thin Au Film at Room Temperature

Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8579, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2025, 16(4), 439; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16040439
Submission received: 10 March 2025 / Revised: 31 March 2025 / Accepted: 3 April 2025 / Published: 7 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Packaging for Microsystem Applications, 3rd Edition)

Abstract

:
Effective thermal management is a critical challenge in achieving high-power output for semiconductor laser devices. A key factor in laser device packaging is the bonding between the laser device on a GaAs substrate and a heat spreader, typically composed of high thermal conductivity materials such as SiC. Conventional soldering methods introduce thick bonding layers with relatively low thermal conductivity, resulting in high thermal resistance at the interface. In this study, we demonstrate the room temperature bonding of GaAs and SiC via a 30 nm thick Au layer, eliminating the need for a thermal reaction bonding layer or vacuum process. Using surface-activated bonding (SAB), GaAs and SiC were successfully bonded, with a strength comparable to bulk fracture. A uniform and ultrathin Au bonding interface significantly reduces thermal resistance compared to conventional soldering methods. These results highlight the potential of SAB with thin Au films as a promising approach for improving thermal management in high-power semiconductor laser devices.

1. Introduction

Due to their ability to deliver high optical power while maintaining excellent beam quality, semiconductor disk lasers (SDLs) have emerged as one of the most promising light sources. Among these, III-V semiconductor materials are widely utilized for high-power laser devices due to their superior optical and electronic properties. In particular, GaAs-based vertical external-cavity surface-emitting lasers (VECSELs) have garnered significant attention as high-power light sources for various applications, including optical communications [1,2], bioimaging [3,4,5], and sensing [6,7]. A key advantage of VECSELs is their tunable emission wavelength, typically spanning 850–1200 nm, enabling flexible adaptation to diverse technological applications.
To achieve both high optical power and precise beam control in a laser device, effective thermal management is crucial. Operating high-power lasers generates significant heat, leading to an increase in the active layer temperature. Due to thermal rollover effects, this temperature rise induces a wavelength shift and reduces output power [8,9]. Consequently, efficient heat dissipation is essential for ensuring stable operation and maintaining performance reliability.
Among the various thermal management strategies, integrating high-power laser structures with heat sinks is widely adopted, employing different materials and bonding configurations [10,11,12]. In the case of VECSELs, the distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) layers, which are typically integrated with the gain region, play a critical role in both optical feedback and thermal conduction. Since heat generated in the gain region must be dissipated through the DBR layers to the heat sink, conventional approaches rely on heat sink–laser chip bonding via soldering [13,14,15,16]. However, optimizing the thermal conductivity of this interface remains a key challenge in developing next-generation high-power VECSELs.
From a materials perspective, high thermal conductivity is a key requirement for heat sink and spreader materials in high-power semiconductor lasers. As a result, materials such as Cu with a thermal conductivity of 401 W/m·K [17], Al at 237 W/m·K [17], diamond at 2400 W/m·K [18], and SiC at 370 W/m·K [19] are commonly employed. Among these, SiC is particularly promising due to its high thermal conductivity, close thermal expansion match with GaAs, excellent thermal stability, and superior mechanical strength. Consequently, SiC-based heat sinks have been widely adopted in various high-power semiconductor laser applications [20,21].
However, the system’s thermal performance is strongly influenced by the bonding interface between the heat sink and the laser device. While soldering is a widely used bonding technique, the intrinsic thermal resistance of the solder layer limits heat dissipation efficiency. Furthermore, the typical solder layer thickness of 30–50 μm introduces additional thermal resistance, impeding effective heat transfer.
To optimize thermal management, the bonding layer should be as thin as possible while maintaining high thermal conductivity. In the case of AuSn soldering, a 3 μm solder thickness between the laser chip and heat sink has been reported to enhance thermal performance [22]. However, it has also been observed that reducing the solder thickness below 20 μm can lead to void formation at the bonding interface, potentially degrading thermal and mechanical reliability [23]. Consequently, achieving a submicron-thick solder layer for bonding between the laser chip and heat sink remains a significant challenge.
Recently, direct GaAs and SiC bonding using the surface-activated bonding (SAB) technique has been demonstrated [24]. With this method, substrate surfaces are activated using an Ar fast atomic beam (FAB) and subsequently bonded in a vacuum environment at room temperature [25,26,27]. As SAB enables direct bonding without forming a thermal reaction layer at the interface, residual thermal stress and damage to the devices can be reduced compared to conventional bonding methods with heating. However, the vacuum processing requirement limits its applicability in practical laser device packaging.
In the meantime, bonding via gold (Au) presents an attractive alternative for heat sink bonding due to its high thermal conductivity, excellent bondability, and compatibility with mild processing conditions, such as low bonding temperatures and pressures [28,29]. Notably, direct Au-Au bonding can be achieved at room temperature in ambient air using the SAB method [30,31,32,33]. In this process, Au surfaces are activated via RF plasma treatment, eliminating contaminants and creating highly reactive surfaces. The activated Au surfaces subsequently form metallic bonds upon contact, even in air. Since this technique does not involve thermal reactions at the interface, the resulting bonding layer can be as thin as ~10 nm, significantly reducing thermal resistance.
In this study, we explore the room temperature and in-air bonding of SiC and GaAs via Au SAB for the packaging of high-power VECSEL devices.

2. Methods

The bonding process is illustrated in Figure 1. For the bonding experiments, we prepared 2-inch, 330 μm thick 4H-SiC and 3-inch, 450 μm thick GaAs wafers. Prior to bonding, the wafers were cleaned using a a two-fluid cleaning process to remove surface contaminants. Following the cleaning step, a 5 nm Ti adhesion layer and a 15 nm Au bonding layer were deposited on both the SiC and GaAs wafer surfaces via sputtering. After deposition, the Au surfaces were activated using RF plasma treatment at a power of 200 W for 30 s. Subsequently, the activated wafers were brought into contact at room temperature in ambient air to achieve direct bonding without bonding load. The bonding quality was evaluated based on surface roughness, bonding strength, and a cross-sectional analysis of the bonding interface.

3. Results and Discussion

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images of the SiC and GaAs surfaces after Au deposition are shown in Figure 2. The root mean square (RMS) surface roughness measured over a 10 × 10 μm2 area was 0.469 nm with a standard deviation of 0.073 (n = 4) for SiC and 0.460 nm a standard deviation of 0.059 (n = 4) for GaAs. Since SAB at room temperature requires an extremely smooth surface with a roughness of less than 1 nm, both SiC and GaAs wafers exhibit sufficiently smooth surfaces suitable for bonding.
The bonded SiC and GaAs wafers are shown in Figure 3. Figure 3a presents an optical photograph of the bonded wafers, while Figure 3b shows an infrared (IR) image of the bonded region. The IR image confirms that the entire 2-inch SiC wafer is completely bonded to the 3-inch GaAs wafer without observable defects. As the interfacial voids can be detected with interference fringes in previous study [30], the results indicates a successful bonding process.
Bonding strength was evaluated through blade insertion and tensile tests. As shown in Figure 4a, the GaAs wafer fractured during the blade insertion test, indicating that the bonding strength exceeds the surface free energy of GaAs (0.86 J/m2 [34]). For the tensile test, 1 × 1 cm2 chips were diced from the bonded wafers. The tensile strength was measured to be 14.9 MPa, and fracture occurred in the GaAs substrate, as shown in Figure 4b. This confirms that the bonding strength between GaAs and SiC exceeds 14.9 MPa. Both mechanical tests demonstrate that the bonded interface is mechanically robust.
Figure 5 presents cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the GaAs/SiC bonding interface. The low-magnification image confirms the uniformity of the bonded interface, while the high-magnification image reveals that GaAs and SiC are bonded via a 5 nm Ti adhesion layer and a 27 nm Au bonding layer. These results indicate that successful bonding was achieved at room temperature.
Further magnified TEM images of the Au/SiC and Au/GaAs interfaces are shown in Figure 6. The images reveal that the crystalline structures of SiC and GaAs remain intact at the outermost wafer surfaces, indicating that room-temperature bonding was achieved without inducing structural damage. While previous studies have reported surface damage due to the surface activation process in direct SiC/GaAs bonding [24], the use of Au-mediated SAB effectively suppresses such damage, preserving bonded bonded materials.
Based on the TEM results, we estimated the thermal resistance of the bonding layer formed by SAB using thin Au films. Figure 7 compares the calculated thermal resistance of a conventional AuSn solder bonding interface with that of the SAB utilizing thin Au films. Calculations were performed using thermal conductivities of 57 W/m·K for AuSn [35], 82 W/m·K for In [17], and 317 W/m·K for Au [17], with bonding layer thicknesses of 3 μm [22], 5 μm [14,15] and 27 nm, respectively, as can be determined in Figure 5. The estimated thermal resistances for the conventional AuSn and In soldering interface are 5.26 × 10−8 m2·K/W and 6.10 × 10−8 m2·K/W, whereas the SAB bonding interface via thin Au films achieves an impressively low thermal resistance of 8.60 × 10−11 m2·K/W.
This reduction of three orders of magnitude is attributed to the superior thermal conductivity of Au and the ultrathin bonding layer. These results demonstrate that SAB using thin Au films not only provides high bond strength but also significantly enhances thermal management efficiency. In addition, it is known that solder bonding has creep failure due to the thermal cycling-induced stress [36]. As the proposed bonding via SAB with Au is solid-state bonding, it is expected that the SAB bonding interface has higher long-term reliability compared to liquid-phase bonding such as soldering. Therefore, this technique is highly promising for the integration of GaAs and SiC in high-power semiconductor laser devices.

4. Conclusions

In this study, GaAs and SiC wafers were successfully bonded at room temperature in ambient air using SAB with thin Au films. The SAB process resulted in a high bond strength and excellent bonding quality. Cross-sectional TEM analysis confirmed the formation of a uniform Au bonding interface without inducing damage to the wafer surfaces. Furthermore, the estimated thermal resistance of the SAB bonding interface was significantly lower than that of conventional solder bonding, highlighting its superior thermal management capability. These findings demonstrate the potential of SAB with thin Au films in advanced packaging for high-power semiconductor laser devices.

Author Contributions

K.T. designed and carried out the experiments, analyzed the experimental results, and wrote the manuscript. K.T. and E.H. discussed the results and commented on and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by AMED under grant number JP19dm0207078.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study can be made available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Hiroyuki Yokoyama (Tohoku University) and Tomomi Nemoto (National Institutes of Natural Sciences) for their valuable discussions on the structure of laser devices.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Wang, T.; Tian, R.; Zhu, R.; Jiang, L.; Tong, C.; Lu, H.; Song, Y.; Zhang, P. Improved underwater wireless optical communication using a passively mode-locked VECSEL. Opt. Commun. 2023, 547, 129850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tian, R.; Wang, T.; Shen, X.; Zhu, R.; Jiang, L.; Lu, Y.; Lu, H.; Song, Y.; Zhang, P. 108 m Underwater Wireless Optical Communication Using a 490 nm Blue VECSEL and an AOM. Sensors 2024, 24, 2609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Voigt, F.F.; Emaury, F.; Bethge, P.; Waldburger, D.; Link, S.M.; Carta, S.; van der Bourg, A.; Helmchen, F.; Keller, U. Multiphoton in vivo imaging with a femtosecond semiconductor disk laser. Biomed. Opt. Express 2017, 8, 3213–3231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nechay, K.; Perttilä, R.; Essaulova, A.; Uusimaa, P. High-power VECSEL with intracavity UV generation for flow cytometry applications. In Proceedings of the High-Speed Biomedical Imaging and Spectroscopy IX, San Francisco, CA, USA, 12 March 2024; Tsia, K.K., Goda, K., Eds.; International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2024; Volume 12853, p. 1285306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bondaz, T.A.G.; McInerney, J.G.; Moloney, J.V.; Jones, R.J. Broadband 1.5 GHz VECSEL-Based Laser System for High Speed Multicontrast Nonlinear Imaging. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2023, 35, 589–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Herper, M.; Gronenborn, S.; Gu, X.; Kolb, J.; Miller, M.; Moench, H. VECSEL for 3D LiDAR applications. In Proceedings of the Vertical External Cavity Surface Emitting Lasers (VECSELs) IX, San Francisco, CA, USA, 4 March 2019; Keller, U., Ed.; International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2019; Volume 10901, p. 109010N. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Korpijärvi, V.M.; Kantola, E.L.; Leinonen, T.; Isoaho, R.; Guina, M. Monolithic GaInNAsSb/GaAs VECSEL Operating at 1550 nm. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2015, 21, 480–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Guina, M.; Rantamäki, A.; Härkönen, A. Optically pumped VECSELs: Review of technology and progress. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2017, 50, 383001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Heinen, B.; Zhang, F.; Sparenberg, M.; Kunert, B.; Koch, M.; Stolz, W. On the Measurement of the Thermal Resistance of Vertical-External-Cavity Surface-Emitting Lasers (VECSELs). IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 2012, 48, 934–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Maclean, A.J.; Kemp, A.J.; Hopkins, J.M.; Hastie, J.E.; Giet, S.; Calvez, S.; Dawson, M.D.; Burns, D.; Kim, J.Y.; Kim, K.S.; et al. An analysis of power scaling and thermal management in a 1060 nm VECSEL with a diamond heatspreader. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics and 2006 Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference, Long Beach, CA, USA, 21–26 May 2006; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rantamäki, A.; Lindfors, J.; Silvennoinen, M.; Kontio, J.; Tavast, M.; Okhotnikov, O.G. Low Temperature Gold-to-Gold Bonded Semiconductor Disk Laser. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2013, 25, 1062–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Baumgärtner, S.; Kahle, H.; Bek, R.; Schwarzbäck, T.; Jetter, M.; Michler, P. Comparison of AlGaInP-VECSEL gain structures. J. Cryst. Growth 2015, 414, 219–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mangold, M.; Wittwer, V.J.; Sieber, O.D.; Hoffmann, M.; Krestnikov, I.L.; Livshits, D.A.; Golling, M.; Südmeyer, T.; Keller, U. VECSEL gain characterization. Opt. Express 2012, 20, 4136–4148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gbele, K.; Laurain, A.; Hader, J.; Stolz, W.; Moloney, J.V. Design and Fabrication of Hybrid Metal Semiconductor Mirror for High-Power VECSEL. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2016, 28, 732–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sheikhi, R.; Huo, Y.; Shi, F.G.; Lee, C.C. Low Temperature VECSEL-to-Diamond Heterogeneous Integration with Ag-In Spinodal Nanostructured Layer. Scr. Mater. 2021, 194, 113628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lyytikäinen, J.; Rautiainen, J.; Sirbu, A.; Mereuta, A.; Caliman, A.; Kapon, E.; Okhotnikov, O. Wafer fused InP-GaAs optically pumped semiconductor disk laser operating at 1.57 μm. In Proceedings of the Photon Counting Applications, Quantum Optics, and Quantum Information Transfer and Processing II, Prague, Czech Republic, 18 May 2009; Dusek, M., Prochazka, I., Sobolewski, R., Eds.; International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2009; Volume 7355, p. 73550C. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ho, C.Y.; Powell, R.W.; Liley, P.E. Thermal Conductivity of the Elements. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1972, 1, 279–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Inyushkin, A.V.; Taldenkov, A.N.; Ralchenko, V.G.; Bolshakov, A.P.; Koliadin, A.V.; Katrusha, A.N. Thermal conductivity of high purity synthetic single crystal diamonds. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 97, 144305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Levinshtein, M.E.; Rumyantsev, S.L.; Shur, M.S. Properties of Advanced Semiconductor Materials: GaN, AIN, InN, BN, SiC, SiGe; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, X.; Jiang, K.; Zhu, Z.; Su, J.; Xia, W.; Xu, X. High-brightness 808 nm semiconductor laser diode packaged by SiC heat sink. J. Mod. Opt. 2020, 67, 1017–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Apollonov, V.V.; Babayants, G.I.; Gruden’, M.N.; Derzhavin, S.I.; Kazakov, A.A.; Kishmakhov, B.S.; Koval’, Y.P.; Kuz’minov, V.V.; Mashkovskii, D.A.; Prokhorov, A.M.; et al. Investigation of the thermal properties of a laser-diode linear array on a silicon carbide heat sink. Quantum Electron. 1997, 27, 845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Giet, S.; Kemp, A.J.; Burns, D.; Calvez, S.; Dawson, M.D.; Suomalainen, S.; Harkonen, A.; Guina, M.; Okhotnikov, O.; Pessa, M. Comparison of thermal management techniques for semiconductor disk lasers. In Proceedings of the Solid State Lasers XVII: Technology and Devices, San Jose, CA, USA, 14 February 2008; Clarkson, W.A., Hodgson, N., Shori, R.K., Eds.; International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2008; Volume 6871, p. 687115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gallery, J.; Lytwynec, S. AuSn Preform Thickness’s Effect on Thermal Management in Semiconductor Laser Applications. IMAPSource Proc. 2023, 2023, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Higurashi, E.; Okumura, K.; Nakasuji, K.; Suga, T. Surface activated bonding of GaAs and SiC wafers at room temperature for improved heat dissipation in high-power semiconductor lasers. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 54, 030207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Takeuchi, K.; Fujino, M.; Matsumoto, Y.; Suga, T. Room temperature bonding and debonding of polyimide film and glass substrate based on surface activate bonding method. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2018, 57, 02BB05. [Google Scholar]
  26. Takeuchi, K.; Mu, F.; Matsumoto, Y.; Suga, T. Room Temperature Wafer Bonding of Glass Using Aluminum Oxide Intermediate Layer. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 8, 2001741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Takeuchi, K.; Suga, T. Quantification of wafer bond strength under controlled atmospheres. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2022, 61, SF1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tsau, C.; Spearing, S.; Schmidt, M. Fabrication of wafer-level thermocompression bonds. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 2002, 11, 641–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Taklo, M.M.V.; Storås, P.; Schjølberg-Henriksen, K.; Hasting, H.K.; Jakobsen, H. Strong, high-yield and low-temperature thermocompression silicon wafer-level bonding with gold. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2004, 14, 884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yamamoto, M.; Matsumae, T.; Kurashima, Y.; Takagi, H.; Suga, T.; Itoh, T.; Higurashi, E. Comparison of Argon and Oxygen Plasma Treatments for Ambient Room-Temperature Wafer-Scale Au–Au Bonding Using Ultrathin Au Films. Micromachines 2019, 10, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Takeuchi, K.; Wang, J.; Kim, B.; Suga, T.; Higurashi, E. Room temperature bonding of Au assisted by self-assembled monolayer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2023, 122, 051603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Higurashi, E.; Okumura, K.; Kunimune, Y.; Saga, T.; Hagiwara, K. Room-Temperature Bonding of Wafers with Smooth Au Thin Films in Ambient Air Using a Surface-Activated Bonding Method. IEICE Trans. Electron. 2017, E100.C, 156–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Takeuchi, K.; Koseki, S.; Thu, L.H.H.; Matsumae, T.; Takagi, H.; Kurashima, Y.; Tsuda, T.; Tokuhisa, T.; Shimizu, T.; Higurashi, E. Room temperature bonding of Au plating through surface smoothing using polyimide template stripping. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2025, 383, 116211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Messmer, C.; Bilello, J.C. The surface energy of Si, GaAs, and GaP. J. Appl. Phys. 1981, 52, 4623–4629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yu, C.; Yang, D.; Zhao, D.; Sheng, Z. Reliability of nano-silver soldering paste with high thermal conductivity. In Proceedings of the 2019 20th International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology (ICEPT), Hong Kong, China, 12–15 August 2019; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhao, S.; Yang, X.; Wu, X.; Liu, G. Investigation on Creep-Fatigue Interaction Failure of Die-Attach Solder Layers in IGBTs Under Power Cycling. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2025, 40, 7261–7274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Bonding process of SAB via thin Au films.
Figure 1. Bonding process of SAB via thin Au films.
Micromachines 16 00439 g001
Figure 2. AFM images of the surfaces of (a) SiC and (b) GaAs wafers after Au deposition.
Figure 2. AFM images of the surfaces of (a) SiC and (b) GaAs wafers after Au deposition.
Micromachines 16 00439 g002
Figure 3. (a) Optical photograph of the bonded three-inch GaAs wafer and two-inch SiC wafer. (b) IR image of the bonded wafers.
Figure 3. (a) Optical photograph of the bonded three-inch GaAs wafer and two-inch SiC wafer. (b) IR image of the bonded wafers.
Micromachines 16 00439 g003
Figure 4. Micrographs of (a) the fractured GaAs wafer from the blade insertion test and (b) the fractured GaAs substrate from the tensile test.
Figure 4. Micrographs of (a) the fractured GaAs wafer from the blade insertion test and (b) the fractured GaAs substrate from the tensile test.
Micromachines 16 00439 g004
Figure 5. Cross-sectional TEM image of the bonding interface between SiC and GaAs via a thin Au layer.
Figure 5. Cross-sectional TEM image of the bonding interface between SiC and GaAs via a thin Au layer.
Micromachines 16 00439 g005
Figure 6. Magnified TEM images of the interfaces (a) between the SiC substrate and Au layer and (b) the Au layer and GaAs substrate.
Figure 6. Magnified TEM images of the interfaces (a) between the SiC substrate and Au layer and (b) the Au layer and GaAs substrate.
Micromachines 16 00439 g006
Figure 7. Estimated thermal resistance of the conventional AuSn soldering interface and the SAB bonding interface via thin Au films.
Figure 7. Estimated thermal resistance of the conventional AuSn soldering interface and the SAB bonding interface via thin Au films.
Micromachines 16 00439 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Takeuchi, K.; Higurashi, E. Wafer Bonding of GaAs and SiC via Thin Au Film at Room Temperature. Micromachines 2025, 16, 439. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16040439

AMA Style

Takeuchi K, Higurashi E. Wafer Bonding of GaAs and SiC via Thin Au Film at Room Temperature. Micromachines. 2025; 16(4):439. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16040439

Chicago/Turabian Style

Takeuchi, Kai, and Eiji Higurashi. 2025. "Wafer Bonding of GaAs and SiC via Thin Au Film at Room Temperature" Micromachines 16, no. 4: 439. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16040439

APA Style

Takeuchi, K., & Higurashi, E. (2025). Wafer Bonding of GaAs and SiC via Thin Au Film at Room Temperature. Micromachines, 16(4), 439. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16040439

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop