Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Reply to Inoue et al. Comment on “Weber et al. Mayenite-Based Electride C12A7e: A Reactivity and Stability Study. Catalysts 2021, 11, 334”
Previous Article in Journal
Regeneration of an Aged Hydrodesulfurization Catalyst by Non-Thermal Plasma: Characterization of Refractory Coke Molecules
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis of Indoles via Intermolecular and Intramolecular Cyclization by Using Palladium-Based Catalysts
 
 
Reply published on 26 September 2021, see Catalysts 2021, 11(10), 1155.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Comment

Comment on Weber et al. Mayenite-Based Electride C12A7e: A Reactivity and Stability Study. Catalysts 2021, 11, 334

1
Catalyst Section, R & D Department, Tsubame-BHB Co., Ltd., 4259 Nagatsuta, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226-8503, Japan
2
Materials Research Center for Element Strategy, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 4259 Nagatsuta, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226-8503, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2021, 11(10), 1154; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11101154
Submission received: 23 April 2021 / Accepted: 14 September 2021 / Published: 26 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Transition Metal Catalysis)
In 2012, we reported that C12A7 electride (C12A7: e) significantly promotes the catalytic activity of Ru nanoparticles for ammonia synthesis through the electron donation from the C12A7: e with a low work function (2.4 eV) to Ru [1]. Recently, Weber et al. [2] reported in this journal that the application of Ru/C12A7e catalysts at the industrial scale is limited prospects due to irreversible hydride formation at high pressures >1 MPa. According to their study, the catalytic activity of Ru/C12A7: e disappeared immediately above 1 MPa, which is totally different from our previous result [1]. Figure 1 summarizes the relevant data in [1,2]. Such a large difference may be caused by the difference in electron concentration (Ne) of C12A7: e used. In [2], the plasma arc melting synthesized C12A7: e (aluminum solid reductant) samples are of dark green color and the is Ne is explained to be in the range of 0.1 to 1.2 × 1021 cm−3. As we reported in [3], the catalytic performance of Ru/C12A7: e critically depends on the electron concentration (Ne) of C12A7: e, e.g., Ru/C12A7: e with Ne > 1.0 × 1021 cm−3 exhibits an order of magnitude higher activity for ammonia synthesis than those with low Ne (<5.0 × 1020 cm−3). We consider that the electron concentration of the plasma-synthesized C12A7: e sample is obviously lower than 1.0 × 1021 cm−3. Kammert et al. also prepared C12A7: e by a similar method using aluminum as a solid reductant, and Ne of the obtained C12A7: e was determined to be 4.0 × 1020 cm−3 by iodometric titration method [4]. Such an insufficient Ne is not effective for the promotion of Ru catalyst in ammonia synthesis. Green sample color means electron concentration does not reach 1 × 1021 cm−3 in our accumulated data. Quantitative relation between Ne and the peak position of absorption band due to electron trapped in the cages are already reported in [5]. We examined the application of the modified Ru/C12A7: e catalysts in ammonia synthesis at high pressures up to 5 MPa. As shown in Figure 1, the ammonia synthesis activity of the modified Ru/C12A7: e catalyst increases with reaction pressure above 3 MPa. Furthermore, the modified Ru/C12A7: e catalyst exhibited excellent stability for almost 2 years at high pressure condition (5 MPa). Therefore, we demonstrate that the Ru/C12A7: e-based catalyst has great potential as a practical catalyst for ammonia synthesis.
Based on the above results, we disagree with the conclusions by Weber et al. that the application potential of C12A7 electride under industrially relevant conditions is limited. We would like to emphasize that the catalytic performance of Ru/C12A7: e changes drastically by electronic structure of C12A7: e controlled by Ne and Ru-support interface structure [6]. A comprehensive review on electrides and their applications focusing on catalyst for NH3 synthesis was recently published [7]. We hope this review is helpful for understanding our concept and approach.

Author Contributions

H.H. conceived the research, Y.I. and M.K. performed the experiment, and all the authors discussed and wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was supported in part by the MEXT Element Strategy Initiative to Form Core Research Center (No. JPMXP0112101001) and JSPS Kakenhi Grants-in-Aid (No. 17H06153).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kitano, M.; Inoue, Y.; Yamazaki, Y.; Hayashi, F.; Kanbara, S.; Matsuishi, S.; Yokoyama, T.; Kim, S.-W.; Hara, M.; Hosono, H. Ammonia synthesis using a stable electride as an electron donor and reversible hydrogen store. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 934–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Weber, S.; Schäfer, S.; Saccoccio, M.; Ortner, N.; Bertmer, M.; Seidel, K.; Berendts, S.; Lerch, M.; Gläser, R.; Kohlmann, H.; et al. Mayenite-Based Electride C12A7e: A Reactivity and Stability Study. Catalysts 2021, 11, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kanbara, S.; Kitano, M.; Inoue, Y.; Yokoyama, T.; Hara, M.; Hosono, H.J. Mechanism Switching of Ammonia Synthesis Over Ru-Loaded Electride Catalyst at Metal–Insulator Transition. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 14517–14524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kammert, J.; Moon, J.; Cheng, Y.; Daemen, L.L.; Irle, S.; Fung, V.; Liu, J.; Page, K.; Ma, X.; Phaneuf, V.; et al. Nature of Reactive Hydrogen for Ammonia Synthesis over a Ru/C12A7 Electride Catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 7655–7667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Matsuishi, S.; Nomura, T.; Hirano, M.; Kodama, K.; Shamoto, S.I.; Hosono, H. Drect Synthesis of Powdery Inorganic Electride [Ca24Al28O64]4+(e)4 and Determination of Oxygen Stoichiometry. Chem. Mater. 2009, 21, 2589–2591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hosono, H. Electron Transfer from Support/Promotor to Metal Catalyst: Requirements for Effective Support. Catal. Lett. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hosono, H.; Kitano, M. Advances in Materials and Applications of Inorganic Electrides. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 3121–3186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Relative activity of various Ru/C12A7: e catalysts as a function of reaction pressure. Temperature: ~360 °C.
Figure 1. Relative activity of various Ru/C12A7: e catalysts as a function of reaction pressure. Temperature: ~360 °C.
Catalysts 11 01154 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Inoue, Y.; Kitano, M.; Hosono, H. Comment on Weber et al. Mayenite-Based Electride C12A7e: A Reactivity and Stability Study. Catalysts 2021, 11, 334. Catalysts 2021, 11, 1154. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11101154

AMA Style

Inoue Y, Kitano M, Hosono H. Comment on Weber et al. Mayenite-Based Electride C12A7e: A Reactivity and Stability Study. Catalysts 2021, 11, 334. Catalysts. 2021; 11(10):1154. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11101154

Chicago/Turabian Style

Inoue, Yasunori, Masaaki Kitano, and Hideo Hosono. 2021. "Comment on Weber et al. Mayenite-Based Electride C12A7e: A Reactivity and Stability Study. Catalysts 2021, 11, 334" Catalysts 11, no. 10: 1154. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11101154

APA Style

Inoue, Y., Kitano, M., & Hosono, H. (2021). Comment on Weber et al. Mayenite-Based Electride C12A7e: A Reactivity and Stability Study. Catalysts 2021, 11, 334. Catalysts, 11(10), 1154. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11101154

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop