Next Article in Journal
Methane Hydrate Formation in Hollow ZIF-8 Nanoparticles for Improved Methane Storage Capacity
Next Article in Special Issue
Fabrication of 5 V High-Performance Solid-State Asymmetric Supercapacitor Device Based on MnO2/Graphene/Ni Electrodes
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis, Characterization, and Catalytic Activity of Nickel Sulfided Catalysts for the Dehydrogenation of Propane: Effect of Sulfiding Agent and Sulfidation Temperature
Previous Article in Special Issue
Highly Photoactive Titanium Dioxide Supported Platinum Catalyst: Synthesis Using Cleaner Ultrasound Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of the Heterovalent Doping of TiO2 with Sc3+ and Nb5+ on the Defect Distribution and Photocatalytic Activity

Laboratory “Photoactive Nanocomposite Materials”, Saint-Petersburg State University, 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2022, 12(5), 484; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12050484
Submission received: 28 March 2022 / Revised: 18 April 2022 / Accepted: 22 April 2022 / Published: 25 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Synthesis and Photocatalytic Activity of Composite)

Abstract

:
Two series of Sc3+- and Nb5+-doped TiO2 (rutile) samples were synthesized and characterized by SEM, ICPE spectroscopy, XPS, and BET methods. Photocatalytic activity of the doped TiO2 samples was tested in photocatalytic degradation of phenol. Dependences of the photocatalytic activities of the doped TiO2 samples demonstrate a volcano-like behavior, indicating the existence of the optimal dopant concentrations to achieve the highest activity of photocatalysts. Remarkably, the optimal dopant concentrations correspond to the extrema observed in work function dependences on the dopant concentrations, that indicates a significant energy redistribution of the defect states within the bandgap of TiO2. Such a redistribution of the defect states is also proven by the alterations of the optical and EPR spectra of the intrinsic Ti3+ defect states in TiO2. Based on the analysis of the experimental results, we conclude that both Sc3+ and Nb5+ doping of TiO2 results in redistribution of the defect states and the optimal dopant concentrations correspond to the defect structures, which are ineffective in charge carrier recombination, that ultimately leads to the higher photocatalytic activity of doped TiO2.

1. Introduction

For the last decades, the metal doping of photocatalysts has become a standard approach to modify the electronic and optical properties of photoactive materials, and therefore, to change their photocatalytic behavior [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. However, in spite of the quite long history of the doping effect exploration in heterogeneous photocatalysis, only two systematic approaches to analyze and describe the effects of various dopants on photocatalytic activity of photoactive materials have been developed until now. The first approach is based on the electronic theory of catalysis developed in the 1960s [11,12,13]. According to the theory, the activity of catalysts in chemical reactions depends on the position of the Fermi level in semiconductor materials (see Figure 1a).
It assumes that the interaction of the adsorbed molecules with the semiconductor surface results in formation of the corresponding localized energy level of adsorbate complex within the bandgap of the semiconductor catalyst. Consequently, if the Fermi level position is located higher than the adsorbate complex level, the electron transfer from the semiconductor to adsorbed molecules occurs. In contrast, should the Fermi level be located below the adsorbate level, the electron transfer is directed from the adsorbed molecules to the semiconductor. The different directions of the electron transfer dictated by the Fermi level position result in the formation of different forms of the adsorbed species, and therefore in their different chemical reactivity. A typical pathway to change the Fermi level position in the semiconductor is heterovalent doping of the semiconductor. Indeed, semiconductor doping with electron-donor atoms results in a shift of the Fermi level toward the conduction band, whereas substitution of the lattice host atoms with electron-acceptor dopants leads to a Fermi level toward the valence band. Thus, heterovalent doping is considered as a method to change the Fermi level position, and therefore to manipulate the chemical reactivity of the adsorbed molecules.
Another approach based on statistical analysis of the large array of experimental data of photocatalytic activity accumulated for various photocatalysts doped with different metals (see Figure 1b) was proposed by Bloh et al. [14] ten years ago. Based on the analysis of the particle size distribution and dopant concentration, it was concluded that a higher activity of photocatalysts is observed for those samples in which particles contain a single dopant atom per particle. Therefore, there is an optimal dopant concentration secured for this condition: at lower concentrations, there are “empty” particles without dopants, and at higher concentrations, dopant atoms (ions) form dopant clusters which can act as efficient recombination centers. Though it was not mentioned in the original article, the statistical analysis in the model was performed only for the photocatalysts containing heterovalent dopants. Note that both approaches are too general and do not consider both chemical and physical peculiarities of dopant atoms (ions), and are focused only on either thermodynamical or statistical effects.
In this study, we performed systematic research of the effect of heterovalent doping of TiO2 (rutile) with Sc3+ and Nb5+ cations at different dopant concentrations to understand the reasons for the dopant-induced alteration of the photocatalytic activity and existence of the dopant optimal concentration for higher activity of the photocatalyst. The selection of the heterovalent dopant cations, Sc3+ and Nb5+, was dictated by the following reasons: (i) substitution of the host Ti4+ cations with either Sc3+ or Nb5+ creates an excess of either negative or positive charge, respectively, in the lattice, which must be compensated due to formation of the corresponding intrinsic defects, and (ii) the energy levels of 3d and 4d electronic states of Sc3+ and Nb5+, respectively, are higher than 3d levels of Ti4+, and therefore are located in the conduction band and do not create energy levels within the bandgap of the host TiO2. Thus, one can observe the redistribution of only the intrinsic defects within the bandgap induced by heterovalent doping with either Sc3+ or Nb5+. At the same time, it is wise to note that lattice distortion responsible for the formation of the intrinsic defect states can also be induced by doping due to differences in the ion radii, which is slightly larger for Nb5+ (0.680 Å) and significantly larger for Sc3+ (0.745 Å) dopants compared to the radii of the host Ti4+ (0.605 Å) cations.
The optical properties of Nb-doped titanium dioxide do not differ much from those of pristine TiO2, which determines its application in the field of transparent conductive oxides [15]. Most studies either do not detect alteration of the spectral position of the absorption edge of Nb-doped TiO2 or observe a blue shift due to the Burstein–Moss effect [16,17,18]. The position of intrinsic defect states associated with niobium dopant within the bandgap of titanium dioxide depends on TiO2 phase. The formation of shallow states at the edge of the conduction band with electron density distributed over several titanium atoms was demonstrated in anatase phase by DFT calculations [19]. At the same time, when niobium was introduced into rutile, defect states were located close to the middle of the bandgap and electron density was significantly localized and distributed only between two neighboring titanium atoms. These deep states were experimentally observed by deep-level transient spectroscopy [20] and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy [21].
Photocatalytic activity of Nb-doped titanium dioxide has been explored for various reactions. For instance, an increase of CO2 conversion to methanol was observed for Nb-doped (0 to 0.65 at.%) anatase [22]. A series of Nb-TiO2 (anatase) samples with the dopant concentration varied up to 10 at.% were synthesized and explored in methylene orange bleaching reaction, and the sample with 0.5 at.% Nb content demonstrated the highest photoactivity [23]. The same sample also showed the highest hydrogen generation rate after Pd deposition. It was demonstrated in [24] that UV irradiation results in a faster transition of Nb-doped TiO2 films to a super-hydrophilic state compared with undoped TiO2. Typically, the selected concentration limits hinder identification of the optimal dopant concentration, which leads to incorrect conclusions about the effect of niobium on the photoactivity of TiO2. For example, in [25], Nb-doped TiO2 demonstrated a continuous increase of photoactivity towards methylene blue decomposition in a concentration range from 0 to 0.59 at.%. At the same time, in another study [16], it was shown that the decomposition rate of methylene blue decreased within the concentration range of 0.74–2.67 at.%. Therefore, such series of Nb-doped TiO2 samples do not allow to establish an optimal dopant concentration.
Similar to niobium doping, scandium doping changes the optical properties of TiO2 insignificantly. There are experimental [26,27] and theoretical [28] studies that show some broadening of the optical bandgap for Sc-TiO2. However, in all cases, researchers report rather small changes in the position of the absorption edge.
Just a few papers report studies on the photocatalytic activity of scandium-doped titanium dioxide. For instance, in [29], Sc-doped TiO2 films were synthesized in the anatase phase at concentrations of 0.5%, 2%, and 5%, and a slight change of the absorption edge was noted. The TiO2 sample with a scandium concentration of 5 at.% demonstrated an increased rate of diclofenac potassium decomposition, while at 0.5 at.%, a decrease of photoactivity was observed. In an extensive study of the effect of 35 dopants on the behavior of Grätzel cells [30], it was noted that 2 at.% of scandium dopant significantly attenuates the light conversion efficiency.
Thus, to understand the major reasons for the dopant-induced alteration of the photocatalytic activity and to establish if there exists an optimal dopant concentration to achieve higher activity of the TiO2 photocatalysts, more systematic and detailed studies with a wide range of dopant concentrations are required.

2. Results and Discussion

Photocatalytic phenol degradation was chosen as a test reaction and the initial rate of phenol degradation was taken as a parameter characterizing the photoactivity of the studied TiO2 photocatalyst samples. Figure 2 demonstrates the dependences of the TiO2 photocatalysts’ activities on the dopant concentrations: either Sc3+ (Figure 2a) or Nb5+ (Figure 2b).
Both dependences clearly demonstrated a volcano-like behavior with well-pronounced maximal extrema at certain values of dopant concentrations. It is wise to note that the Sc3+ and Nb5+ dopant concentrations corresponding to the maximal activity of doped TiO2 were different, which indicates the importance of the dopant nature. Moreover, the dopant concentrations corresponding to the maximal photocatalytic activity were significantly larger (105–107 dopant ions per particle) than those predicted by the statistical approach mentioned above (see Figure 1b) [14]. Therefore, the effect of the dopants on the activity of photocatalysts is more complex than a dopant number factor.
Figure 3 demonstrates the alteration of the work function of doped TiO2 samples depending on the Sc3+ and Nb5+ dopant concentrations, together with the dependences of photocatalytic activities shown in Figure 2.
The dependences of work functions on Sc3+ and Nb5+ dopant concentrations clearly demonstrated the apparent correlations with dependences of photocatalytic activities, and their extrema were observed at the same values of dopant concentrations. At the same time, the characteristics of work function behavior observed for Sc3+ and Nb5+ dopants were different: for Sc3+ doping, the maximum of photocatalytic activity corresponds to the minimum of the work function, while for Nb5+ doping, the maximum of photocatalytic activity correlates with the maximum of the work function value. This observation contradicts the prediction of the electronic theory of catalysis due to the different trends in the alteration of work functions observed for Sc3+ and Nb5+ dopants, and therefore, different trends in the alteration of the Fermi level position result in a maximum of photocatalytic activity in both cases.
In general, the alteration of the work function, indicating the alteration of the Fermi level, originates from either the appearance of the new electronic states or the rearrangement or redistribution of the existing electronic states within the bandgap of the semiconductor. A Fermi level shift toward the conduction band originates from the higher concentration of the electron-donor states located close to the bottom of the conduction band, while a Fermi level shift toward the valence band means higher concentrations of the electron-acceptor states at the top of the valence band. Thus, one may conclude that TiO2 doping with either Sc3+ or Nb5+ cations at optimal concentrations results in redistribution of the various defect states, leading to a Fermi level shift toward either the conduction band or the valence band, respectively, that in turn corresponds to the maximal photocatalytic activity for both types of doped photocatalysts.
To confirm such dopant-induced defect state redistributions and to establish the corresponding types of defect states, we performed spectroscopic studies of photoinduced defect formation by means of both diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and EPR spectrometry. Figure 4 demonstrates the absorption spectra of photoinduced defects generated during irradiation for 20 min for the samples with different dopant concentrations.
A detailed description of the mechanism of photoinduced defect formation can be found elsewhere [31,32,33] and its simplified version is presented in the Supplementary Materials (see also Figure S1).
A simple visual comparison of two sets of photoinduced defect absorption spectra for Sc3+- and Nb5+-doped TiO2 samples inferred that the absorption values for both sets of the samples strongly depend on the dopant concentrations. Moreover, the shapes of the defect absorption spectra were rather different, which indicates the different impact of the different defect states on the absorption spectra, that is a manifestation of the defect redistribution. Figure 5 demonstrates the deconvolutions of the photoinduced defect absorption spectra with the three single absorption bands resulting in the best fitting of the original spectra.
Remarkably, the deconvolution of the absorption spectra of photoinduced defects for both Sc- and Nb-doped TiO2 resulted in the best fitting with three single Gaussian bands, the parameters of which (energy of maxima) correspond well to the absorption bands of the different Ti3+ intrinsic defect states observed earlier elsewhere [34,35]. Thus, the results of the deconvolution of both absorption spectra of photoinduced defects clearly indicated that both Sc3+ and Nb5+ doping of TiO2 caused significant redistribution of the intrinsic defect states in titanium dioxide and did not create new types of defects.
Both pre-existing and photoinduced Ti3+ defect states can also be detected by the EPR spectrometry method. Supplementary Figure S2 demonstrates EPR spectra of the intrinsic paramagnetic defects in pristine and in Sc3+- and Nb5+-doped TiO2.
EPR spectra of Sc-doped TiO2 consist of groups of signals with the most intense bands at g = 1.905, 1.940, and 1.965 (Supplementary Figure S2b). According to previously published results, the signals should be attributed to Ti3+ centers in rutile [36,37]. Depending on the dopant concentration, EPR spectra of Sc-doped TiO2 demonstrated both qualitative and quantitative redistribution of the defect states. Most clearly, this redistribution of Ti3+ defect states can be seen in EPR absorption spectra obtained by integration of the original EPR spectra (Supplementary Figure S3).
EPR spectra of Nb-doped TiO2 samples are shown in Supplementary Figure S2c. The spectra are presented by a complex signal in the region of g~1.94, which can be attributed to Ti3+ defect states in rutile [36,37]. Nb doping leads to higher amounts of Ti3+ states with respect to the undoped sample, that can be attributed to the electron-donor behavior of niobium states in titanium dioxide lattice.
The effect of UV irradiation on EPR spectra of pristine and Sc3+- and Nb5+-doped TiO2 (Supplementary Figure S2) indicates that photoexcitation of TiO2 results in a further redistribution of the defect states due to charge trapping and recombination, which correlates qualitatively with the results obtained by optical spectroscopy (Figure 4).
The double integral of the EPR signal is proportional to the number of detected paramagnetic defect states. Figure 6 demonstrates the dependences of EPR double-integral values on the Sc3+ and Nb5+ dopant concentrations after UV irradiation for 20 min.
Dependences of the double-integrated EPR signal on the Sc3+ and Nb5+ dopant concentrations clearly demonstrate very different behavior with extrema corresponding to the dopant concentrations, resulting in the highest photocatalytic activities of the doped TiO2 samples. Indeed, the EPR signal of Sc-doped TiO2 indicates that UV irradiation results in an increase of the number of Ti3+ states (most pronounced for the optimal Sc dopant concentration in terms of photocatalytic activity), whereas for Nb-doped TiO2, UV irradiation results in a significant decay of the number of Ti3+ states compared to undoped TiO2, and the number of these states remains stable only at the optimal Nb dopant concentration corresponding to the sample with the highest photocatalytic activity. In other words, UV irradiation of Sc-doped TiO2 results in the formation of new Ti3+ states due to electron trapping by pre-existing defects, and UV irradiation of Nb-doped TiO2 leads to the decay of Ti3+ states caused by recombination with photogenerated holes, indicating in both cases the defect states’ redistribution depending on both Sc3+ and Nb5+ dopant concentrations.
Considering the defect redistribution in TiO2 depending on the dopant type and concentration, as indicated by diffuse reflectance spectra and EPR spectra, and indicating that the maximal or minimal effect of defect state redistribution is observed at the same dopant concentrations, which corresponds to the extrema in work function and photocatalytic activity, we propose the following mechanisms of the dopant effects on the photocatalytic activity of doped TiO2.
Sc3+ doping brings an excess of the negative effective charge into titanium lattice, and therefore creates a local electric field of the negative charge, which increases the energy of the electronic states of the intrinsic defect, making them shallow. This charge excess shall be compensated by the intrinsic defects possessing an effective positive charge, such as anion vacancies [38]. Since for low Sc dopant concentrations up to the optimal (0.05 at.%) the EPR signal of Ti3+ centers increases (Figure 6), it is wise to assume the formation of defect states such as Sc3+–VacO–Ti3+ (Figure 7) with a compensated charge. At higher Sc3+ concentrations, the formation of defect states such as Sc3+–VacO–Sc3+ is more favorable due to the larger number of dopant atoms, which is confirmed by a decrease of the Ti3+ EPR signal and by a drastic alteration of absorption of the photoinduced defects (see Figure 4 and Figure 6).
The spatial and structural redistribution of the intrinsic defects induced by Sc3+ doping of TiO2 is accompanied by corresponding energy redistribution of these defects within the bandgap of titanium dioxide. For Sc dopant concentrations below 0.05 at.%, EPR and optical spectra indicate an increase of the number of Ti3+ states. Lower work function values imply the proximity of the position of the energy levels for these states to the conduction band. Such shallow traps are typically ineffective as recombination centers [39]. Stabilization of the shallow traps along with destabilization of intrinsic deep states (due to the presence of the negatively charged Sc3+ states) lead to a decrease of the recombination efficiency, and therefore result in the promotion of photocatalytic activity of TiO2. A further increase of the scandium concentration leads to a qualitative alteration in the structure of defect states, which is manifested by a significant decrease of the EPR signal of Ti3+ centers, apparently due to the formation of Sc3+–VacO–Sc3+ defect states that stabilize deep states such as anion vacancies. In addition, an increase in the number of dopant atoms suggests the formation of deep defect agglomerates, which as a rule are effective in recombination processes. Thus, the formation of deep defect states at higher Sc dopant concentrations leads to a downward shift of the Fermi level position, an increase of recombination efficiency, and therefore, to the decrease of photocatalytic activity.
In turn, TiO2 doping with Nb5+ brings an excess of the positive charge into the lattice, and therefore creates the local electric fields of the positive charge, which decrease the energy of the electronic states of the intrinsic defects, making them deeper. At low concentrations, the excess of the positive charge of the Nb5+ dopant states can be compensated by intrinsic Ti3+ defects. For those Nb5+ atoms that are located close to compensating Ti3+ states, it is energetically favorable to form a defective structure such as Nb5+–O2−–Ti3+ [40] (see Figure 8a). In this case, an electron transfer from the Ti3+ cation to the Nb5+ cation may also result in the formation of Nb4+–O2−–Ti4+ complex defect states, which leads to a decrease of the corresponding EPR signal (see Figure 6b). Note that both types of defect states are electrically neutral and stable. At the optimal niobium dopant concentration (0.74 at.%), a number of such defect states approach the maximum extremum. However, a further increase of niobium content leads to an increased probability that Nb dopant atoms are located near the Nb5+–O–Ti3+ defect states, and thereby, their charge neutrality will be destabilized.
The dependence of the work function on the niobium concentration indicates that the deep defect states prevail in the Nb-doped TiO2 sample with the maximal photocatalytic activity (see Figure 8b). Due to their electroneutrality, such deep defect states as Nb5+–O–Ti3+ or Nb4+–O2−–Ti4+ cannot behave as efficient centers of recombination in spite of the deep position of their energy levels within the bandgap. Thus, defect redistribution in the region of optimal concentrations leads to prevalence of such defects and results in a decrease of the charge carrier recombination rate, and hence to the promotion of the photocatalytic activity of TiO2.
Summing up the experimental results, we conclude that both Sc3+ and Nb5+ doping of TiO2 results in redistribution of the defect states, as proven by work function, optical, and EPR measurements, and the optimal dopant concentrations correspond to the defect structures, which are ineffective in charge carrier recombination, that ultimately leads to the higher photocatalytic activity of doped TiO2.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Synthesis and Characterization

Two sets of Sc3+- and Nb5+-doped TiO2 samples were synthesized by the solid-state thermochemical method. Original metal oxide powders (TiO2 (anatase), Nb2O5, ScCl3) with purity not less than 99.98% (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, USA & Vekton, Saint Petersburg, Russia) were used in a stoichiometric proportion, mixed, and ground with agate mortar in isopropyl alcohol for 40 min. The obtained mixtures were subsequently heated at 650, 800, and 1000 °C in the ambient atmosphere for 10, 10, and 25 h at each temperature, respectively, with intermediate milling after every heating cycle. After heating at 1000 °C, the samples were cooled down to room temperature with a temperature decay rate of 1°/min. The treatment time at 1000 °C was chosen to achieve a complete transition of titanium dioxide to the rutile phase. As a result, sixteen Nb-doped TiO2 samples with the dopant concentration (x) ranging from 0.0 to 1.7 at.% (x (at.%) = 0.00, 0.06, 0.12, 0.25, 0.39, 0.48, 0.59, 0.63, 0.74, 0.86, 0.93, 1.09, 1.14, 1.28, 1.65, 1.67) and eight samples of Sc-doped TiO2 with the dopant concentration ranging from 0.0 to 1.0 at.% (x (at.%) = 0.00, 0.025, 0.05, 0.10, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00) were obtained. The dopant concentrations in the samples were determined by ICP atomic emission spectroscopy with a Shimadzu ICPE-9000 spectrometer (Kyoto, Japan).
Phase composition was determined by X-ray diffraction analysis. The “Rigaku Miniflex II” diffractometer was used with a Cu Kα emission line (anode voltage of 10 mA, accelerating potential difference of 30 kV) in the range of 10° ≤ 2θ ≤ 80° and a scanning rate of 0.5°/min. Phase composition was determined by the Rietveld method using the TOPAS 4.2 program (Bruker AXS, Brisbane, Australia) linked to the ICSD database. According to XRD analysis, all samples were in rutile crystal phase (see Supplementary Figure S4). Microstructural images of and element distribution in the synthesized samples were obtained by means of the Zeiss Merlin scanning electron microscope. According to the electron microscopic images (see Supplementary Figure S5), all dispersed samples consisted of well-crystalized particles of a parallelepiped-like shape with a mean particle size of about 1.5–2.0 μm. The specific surface area measured by the BET method with nitrogen was about 1.0 ± 0.2 m2.
X-ray photoelectron spectra were recorded by a Thermo Fisher Scientific Escalab 250Xi spectrometer (Waltham, MA, USA) (see Supplementary Figure S6). In addition to the typical XPS signals corresponding to TiO2 (O1s, Ti2p3/2, and Ti2p1/2), the dopant signals for Sc3+ (Sc2p3/2) and Nb5+ (Nb3d3/2 and Nb3d5/2 states, respectively) were clearly observed and their intensity increased with the increase of the corresponding dopant concentrations.

3.2. Photocatalytic Measurements

Photocatalytic activity of either Sc- or Nb-doped TiO2 samples was tested in a reaction of phenol photodegradation over TiO2. The initial rate of phenol decomposition was selected as a measure of photocatalytic activity. The photocatalytic reactor was a 400 mL glass, silver-coated on the outside with a lateral quartz window for illumination of suspension. Stirring of the reaction mixture was carried out with a magnetic stirrer. Standard experimental conditions were as follows: the initial phenol concentration was 100 ppm, the photocatalyst loading was 2 g/L, and the mixture volume was 300 mL. The solution was acidified to pH 3 by HCl. The pH value was selected in order to obtain phenol completely in molecular form and to avoid uncertainties associated with the surface charge state of TiO2 (isoelectric point), and to stay within the region of independence of the phenol decomposition rate on pH [41]. Before irradiation, the solution was stirred in the dark for 1 h to achieve adsorption equilibrium. Blank experiments without TiO2 were performed, demonstrating the absence of any changes in the phenol concentration over time due to direct phenol photolysis.
An Osram 150 W xenon lamp was used as the light source. In order to avoid direct phenol photolysis, the BS-6 cut-off filter (see Supplementary Figure S7) and a water bath for heating reduction were installed in front of the quartz window of the reactor. The temperature of the reactor during the experiment was kept within 25–28 °C.
Phenol concentration was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (RP, C18 Zorbax Eclipse, methanol/water 50/50, ~1 mL/min, MWD detector), and the obtained value was averaged over three probes.

3.3. Work Function Measurements

Thermal work function was determined by the Kelvin probe method (vibrating capacitor) with the SKP5050 instrument (KP Technology, Wick, United Kingdom) using a 2 mm gold tip and a gold reference to estimate the work function value of the tested sample. Solid-phase samples were pressed into tablets and sintered at a temperature of 1000 °C for 5 h. Sintered pellets were then used as one of the capacitor plates. The gradient value was set the same for all samples in the series. The experimental deviation of work function values at different points of the pellet did not exceed 15–20 mV.

3.4. Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy

Diffuse reflectance spectra were recorded at room temperature on a Cary 5000 spectrophotometer equipped with a 2500 DRA attachment for diffuse reflectance measurements. Optically pure BaSO4 was used as a reference sample. Diffuse reflectance spectra of the pristine and doped samples are shown in Supplementary Figure S8. Application of the Tauc plot approach for diffuse reflectance spectra treatment allowed us to determine the apparent optical bandgap for all synthesized samples, which was estimated to be 3.05 ± 0.07 eV and corresponds well to the bandgap of rutile [42]. Therefore, TiO2 doping with either Sc or Nb does not change the optical bandgap of TiO2.
Experiments on photoinduced defect formation were carried out using sample irradiation with a 120 W high-pressure mercury lamp (DRK-120) and a UFS-2 bandpass filter (see Supplementary Figure S7). Irradiation intensity was 50 μW/cm2 at 365 nm. Different diffuse reflectance spectra, ΔR, were taken as a measure to estimate the absorption, ΔA, of photoinduced defects:
ΔA = ΔR = R0 − R(t)
here, R0 is a diffuse reflectance spectrum of the sample before irradiation and R(t) is a diffuse reflectance spectrum of the sample after UV irradiation for the time, t (see Supplementary Figure S1).

3.5. EPR Measurements

Electron paramagnetic resonance spectra were recorded by Adani SPINSCAN X (Minsk, Belarus) (X-band). Cells filled with a certain amount of the sample were placed into the resonator without any preliminarily treatment. Spectra were measured in the air atmosphere. Typical instrument settings were as follows: frequency and modulation amplitude were 100 kHz and 20–75 μT, respectively, and the scanning rate was 0.4 Gauss/s. A Dewar flask was used for the measurements at a liquid nitrogen temperature of 77 K. Photoinduced formation of paramagnetic defects was studied with sample irradiation by a mercury lamp (DRK-120) equipped with a UFS-2 bandpass filter (see Supplementary Figure S7), with simultaneous rotation of the cell by an overhead stirrer to achieve a uniform irradiation.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/catal12050484/s1, Description of photoinduced defect formation, Figure S1: Diffuse reflectance spectra before and after UV irradiation of undoped and doped TiO2; Figure S2: EPR spectra of pristine and doped TiO2; Figure S3: Integrated EPR spectra of Sc-doped TiO2; Figure S4: XRD pattern of Sc- and Nb-doped TiO2 samples; Figure S5: Electron microscopic images of undoped and doped TiO2; Figure S6: XPS spectra of Sc- and Nb-doped TiO2 samples; Figure S7: Transmittance spectra of BS-6 cut-off and UFS-2 bandpass filters; Figure S8: Diffuse reflectance spectra and Tauc plot transformation of Sc- and Nb-doped TiO2 samples.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.V.E. and D.W.B.; methodology, A.V.E.; software, P.D.M.; validation, A.V.R. and A.V.E.; formal analysis, P.D.M.; investigation, P.D.M.; resources, D.W.B.; writing—original draft preparation, P.D.M., A.V.R. and A.V.E.; writing—review and editing, A.V.E. and D.W.B.; visualization, P.D.M. and A.V.E.; supervision, D.W.B.; project administration, A.V.E.; funding acquisition, A.V.E. and D.W.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The reported study was funded by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project number 18-29-23035 mk, and supported by Saint Petersburg University (ID: 91696387).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and supplementary material.

Acknowledgments

P.D.M., A.V.R. and A.V.E. are grateful to the Russian Foundation for Basic Research for financial support of the present study (Grant No: 18-29-23035 mk). All experiments were performed in the Laboratory “Photoactive Nanocomposite Materials” supported by Saint Petersburg University (ID: 91696387). The authors are grateful to the researchers of the resource centers “Nanophotonics”, “Centre for X-ray Diffraction Studies”, “Centre for Physical Methods of Surface Investigation”, “Centre for Diagnostics of Functional Materials for Medicine, Pharmacology and Nanoelectronics”, “Centre for Geo-Environmental Research and Modelling (GEOMODEL)”, “Chemistry Educational Centre”, and “Centre for Innovative Technologies of Composite Nanomaterials” of the SPbU Research Park for their excellent expertise and technical support in performing various sample characterizations.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gao, B.; Lim, T.M.; Subagio, D.P.; Lim, T.T. Zr-doped TiO2 for enhanced photocatalytic degradation of bisphenol A. Appl. Catal. A 2010, 375, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bigdeli, T.; Moradi Dehaghi, S. The effect of trace amount of Zr-doped TiO2 on photocatalytic activity in degradation of organic waste. Energy Sources A: Recovery Util. Environ. Eff. 2018, 40, 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Oropeza, F.E.; Davies, B.; Palgrave, R.G.; Egdell, R.G. Electronic basis of visible region activity in high area Sn-doped rutile TiO2 photocatalysts. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 7882–7891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Byrne, C.; Moran, L.; Hermosilla, D.; Merayo, N.; Blanco, A.; Rhatigan, S.; Hinder, S.; Ganguly, P.; Nolan, M.; Pillai, S.C. Effect of Cu doping on the anatase-to-rutile phase transition in TiO2 photocatalysts: Theory and experiments. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 246, 266–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Huang, J.Q.; Li, G.J.; Zhou, Z.F.; Jiang, Y.B.; Hu, Q.Q.; Xue, C.B.; Guo, W. Efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production over Rh and Nb codoped TiO2 nanorods. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 337, 282–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Choi, J.; Park, H.; Hoffmann, M.R. Effects of single metal-ion doping on the visible-light photoreactivity of TiO2. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 783–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Sun, H.; Zhou, G.; Liu, S.; Ang, H.M.; Tadé, M.O.; Wang, S. Visible light responsive titania photocatalysts codoped by nitrogen and metal (Fe, Ni, Ag, or Pt) for remediation of aqueous pollutants. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 231, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Murashkina, A.A.; Murzin, P.D.; Rudakova, A.V.; Ryabchuk, V.K.; Emeline, A.V.; Bahnemann, D.W. Influence of the dopant concentration on the photocatalytic activity: Al-doped TiO2. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 24695–24703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Murashkina, A.A.; Rudakova, A.V.; Ryabchuk, V.K.; Nikitin, K.V.; Mikhailov, R.V.; Emeline, A.V.; Bahnemann, D.W. Influence of the dopant concentration on the photoelectrochemical behavior of Al-doped TiO2. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 7975–7981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Murzin, P.D.; Murashkina, A.A.; Emeline, A.V.; Bahnemann, D.W. Effect of Sc3+/V5+ co-doping on photocatalytic activity of TiO2. Top. Catal. 2021, 64, 817–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wolkenstein, T. The Electronic Theory of Catalysis on Semiconductors, 1st ed.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK, 1963; 169p. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wolkenstein, T. The electronic theory of photocatalytic reactions on semiconductors. Adv. Catal. 1973, 23, 157–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hauffe, K.; Stechemesser, R. Zur Randschicht-Theorie der Adsorption und Katalyse an Halbleiter-Katalysatoren. In Electronic Phenomena in Chemisorption and Catalysis on Semiconductors. Symposium on Electronic Phenomena in Chemisorption and Catalysis on Semiconductors Held in Moscow, July 2–4, 1968, 1st ed.; Hauffe, K., Wolkenstein, T., Eds.; Walter De Gruyter & Co.: Berlin, Germany, 1969; Chapter 1; pp. 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bloh, J.Z.; Dillert, R.; Bahnemann, D.W. Designing optimal metal-doped photocatalysts: Correlation between photocatalytic activity, doping ratio, and particle size. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 25558–25562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Singh, S.; Sharma, V.; Sachdev, K. Investigation of effect of doping concentration in Nbdoped TiO2 thin films for TCO applications. J. Mater. Sci. 2017, 52, 11580–11591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ratova, M.; Kelly, P.J.; West, G.T.; Iordanova, I. Enhanced properties of magnetron sputtered photocatalytic coatings via transition metal doping. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2013, 228 (Suppl.1), S544–S549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ben Jemaa, I.; Chaabouni, F.; Presmanes, L.; Thimont, Y.; Abaab, M.; Barnabe, A.; Tailhades, P. Structural, optical and electrical investigations on Nb doped TiO2 radiofrequency sputtered thin films from a powder target. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2016, 27, 13242–13248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kaleji, B.K.; Sarraf-Mamoory, R.; Fujishima, A. Influence of Nb dopant on the structural and optical properties of nanocrystalline TiO2 thin films. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2012, 132, 210–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lee, H.Y.; Robertson, J. Doping and compensation in Nb-doped anatase and rutile TiO2. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 113, 213706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Miyagi, T.; Kamei, M.; Sakaguchi, I.; Mitsuhashi, T.; Yamazaki, A. Photocatalytic property and deep levels of Nb-doped anatase TiO2 film grown by metalorganic chemical vapor deposition. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2004, 43, 775–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Morris, D.; Dou, Y.; Rebane, J.; Mitchell, C.E.J.; Egdell, R.G.; Law, D.S.L.; Vittadini, A.; Casarin, M. Photoemission and STM study of the electronic structure of Nb-doped TiO2. Phys. Rev. B 2000, 61, 13445–13457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Nogueira, M.V.; Lustosa, G.M.M.M.; Kobayakawa, Y.; Kogler, W.; Ruiz, M.; Monteiro Filho, E.S.; Zaghete, M.A.; Perazolli, L.A. Nb-doped TiO2 photocatalysts used to reduction of CO2 to methanol. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 2018, 7326240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Wu, M.-C.; Lin, T.-H.; Chih, J.-S.; Hsiao, K.-C.; Wu, P.-Y. Niobium doping induced morphological changes and enhanced photocatalytic performance of anatase TiO2. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2017, 56, 04CP07. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mardare, D.; Yildiz, A.; Girtan, M.; Manole, A.; Dobromir, M.; Irimia, M.; Adomnitei, C.; Cornei, N.; Luca, D. Surface wettability of titania thin films with increasing Nb content. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 112, 073502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Lee, D.Y.; Park, J.-H.; Kim, Y.-H.; Lee, M.-H.; Cho, N.-I. Effect of Nb doping on morphology, crystal structure, optical band gap energy of TiO2 thin films. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2014, 14, 421–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hirano, M.; Date, K. Scandium-doped anatase (TiO2) nanoparticles directly formed by hydrothermal crystallization. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2005, 88, 2604–2607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, J.; Qiu, T.; Nie, H.; Shen, C. Microstructure and optical properties of scandium doped TiO2 nanoparticles. J. Rare Earths 2006, 24 (Suppl. 3), 72–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wei, Z.; Mei, W.; Xiyu, S.; Yachao, W.; Zhenyong, L. Electronic and optical properties of the doped TiO2 system. J. Semicond. 2010, 31, 072001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cavalheiro, A.A.; Bruno, J.C.; Saeki, M.J.; Valente, J.P.S.; Florentino, A.O. Effect of scandium on the structural and photocatalytic properties of titanium dioxide thin films. J. Mater. Sci. 2008, 43, 602–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Berglund, S.P.; Hoang, S.; Minter, R.L.; Fullon, R.R.; Mullins, C.B. Investigation of 35 elements as single metal oxides, mixed metal oxides, or dopants for titanium dioxide for dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 25248–25258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shaitanov, L.; Murashkina, A.; Rudakova, A.; Ryabchuk, V.; Emeline, A.; Artemev, Y.; Kataeva, G.; Serpone, N. UV-induced formation of color centers in dispersed TiO2 particles: Effect of thermal treatment, metal (Al) doping, and adsorption of molecules. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2018, 354, 33–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Emeline, A.V.; Rudakova, A.V.; Mikhaylov, R.V.; Ryabchuk, V.K.; Serpone, N. Electron Transfer Processes in Heterostructured Photocatalysts. In Springer Handbook of Inorganic Photochemistry, 1st ed.; Bahnemann, D.W., Patrocinio, A.O.T., Eds.; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; ISBN 978-3-030-63712-5. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kuznetsov, V.N.; Serpone, N. Photoinduced coloration and photobleaching of titanium dioxide in TiO2/polymer compositions upon UV- and visible-light excitation of color centers’ absorption bands: Direct experimental evidence negating band-gap narrowing in anion-/cation-doped TiO2s. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 15277–15288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kuznetsov, V.N.; Glazkova, N.I.; Mikhaylov, R.V.; Serpone, N. In situ study of photo- and thermo-induced color centers in photochromic rutile TiO2 in the temperature range 90–720 K. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2016, 15, 1289–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kuznetsov, V.N.; Serpone, N. Visible light absorption by various titanium dioxide specimens. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 25203–25209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kumar, C.P.; Gopal, N.O.; Wang, T.C.; Wong, M.S.; Ke, S.C. EPR investigation of TiO2 nanoparticles with temperature-dependent properties. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 5223–5229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. MacDonald, I.R.; Rhydderch, S.; Holt, E.; Grant, N.; Storey, J.M.D.; Howe, R.F. EPR studies of electron and hole trapping in titania photocatalysts. Catal. Today 2012, 182, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Iwaszuk, A.; Nolan, M. Charge compensation in trivalent cation doped bulk rutile TiO2. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2011, 23, 334207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Böer, K.W.; Pohl, U.W. Carrier Recombination and Noise. In Semiconductor Physics, 1st ed.; Böer, K.W., Pohl, U.W., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 1–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gray, T.J.; McCain, C.C.; Masse, N.G. Defect structure and catalysis in the TiO2 system (Semi-conducting and magnetic Properties). J. Phys. Chem. 1959, 63, 472–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. O’Shea, K.E.; Cardona, C. The reactivity of phenol in irradiated aqueous suspensions of TiO2. Mechanistic changes as a function of solution pH. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 1995, 91, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Luttrell, T.; Halpegamage, S.; Tao, J.; Kramer, A.; Sutter, E.; Batzill, M. Why is anatase a better photocatalyst than rutile?—Model studies on epitaxial TiO2 films. Sci. Rep. 2015, 4, 4043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. (a) Illustration of basic postulates of the electronic theory of catalysis. (b) Illustration of the statistical approach for the optimal doping concentration, adapted with permission from [14]. Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society.
Figure 1. (a) Illustration of basic postulates of the electronic theory of catalysis. (b) Illustration of the statistical approach for the optimal doping concentration, adapted with permission from [14]. Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society.
Catalysts 12 00484 g001
Figure 2. Experimental dependences of the initial rates of phenol photocatalytic degradation on dopant concentrations in TiO2: (a) Sc3+ and (b) Nb5+.
Figure 2. Experimental dependences of the initial rates of phenol photocatalytic degradation on dopant concentrations in TiO2: (a) Sc3+ and (b) Nb5+.
Catalysts 12 00484 g002
Figure 3. Dependences of the photocatalytic activities (curves 1, in black) and work functions (curve 2, in blue) of doped TiO2 on dopant concentrations: (a) Sc3+ and (b) Nb5+.
Figure 3. Dependences of the photocatalytic activities (curves 1, in black) and work functions (curve 2, in blue) of doped TiO2 on dopant concentrations: (a) Sc3+ and (b) Nb5+.
Catalysts 12 00484 g003
Figure 4. Absorption spectra of photoinduced defects generated for 20 min for the TiO2 samples with different dopant concentrations: (a) Sc3+ and (b) Nb5+.
Figure 4. Absorption spectra of photoinduced defects generated for 20 min for the TiO2 samples with different dopant concentrations: (a) Sc3+ and (b) Nb5+.
Catalysts 12 00484 g004
Figure 5. Deconvolution (red dashed lines) of the absorption spectra (blue solid lines) of photoinduced defects in (a) Sc-doped TiO2 and (b) Nb-doped TiO2.
Figure 5. Deconvolution (red dashed lines) of the absorption spectra (blue solid lines) of photoinduced defects in (a) Sc-doped TiO2 and (b) Nb-doped TiO2.
Catalysts 12 00484 g005
Figure 6. Dependences of the double-integrated EPR signal corresponding to the number of photoinduced paramagnetic Ti3+ states on the dopant concentrations in: (a) Sc-doped TiO2 and (b) Nb-doped TiO2.
Figure 6. Dependences of the double-integrated EPR signal corresponding to the number of photoinduced paramagnetic Ti3+ states on the dopant concentrations in: (a) Sc-doped TiO2 and (b) Nb-doped TiO2.
Catalysts 12 00484 g006
Figure 7. Illustration of the (a) spatial and (b) energy redistribution of the defect states in Sc-doped TiO2. Yellow dashes are Ti3+ centers, gray are deep centers of various types.
Figure 7. Illustration of the (a) spatial and (b) energy redistribution of the defect states in Sc-doped TiO2. Yellow dashes are Ti3+ centers, gray are deep centers of various types.
Catalysts 12 00484 g007
Figure 8. Illustration of the (a) spatial and (b) energy redistribution of the defect states in Nb-doped TiO2. Yellow dashes are Ti4+–O–Ti3+ states, blue dashes are Ti3+–O–Nb5+ states.
Figure 8. Illustration of the (a) spatial and (b) energy redistribution of the defect states in Nb-doped TiO2. Yellow dashes are Ti4+–O–Ti3+ states, blue dashes are Ti3+–O–Nb5+ states.
Catalysts 12 00484 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Murzin, P.D.; Rudakova, A.V.; Emeline, A.V.; Bahnemann, D.W. Effect of the Heterovalent Doping of TiO2 with Sc3+ and Nb5+ on the Defect Distribution and Photocatalytic Activity. Catalysts 2022, 12, 484. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12050484

AMA Style

Murzin PD, Rudakova AV, Emeline AV, Bahnemann DW. Effect of the Heterovalent Doping of TiO2 with Sc3+ and Nb5+ on the Defect Distribution and Photocatalytic Activity. Catalysts. 2022; 12(5):484. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12050484

Chicago/Turabian Style

Murzin, Petr D., Aida V. Rudakova, Alexei V. Emeline, and Detlef W. Bahnemann. 2022. "Effect of the Heterovalent Doping of TiO2 with Sc3+ and Nb5+ on the Defect Distribution and Photocatalytic Activity" Catalysts 12, no. 5: 484. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12050484

APA Style

Murzin, P. D., Rudakova, A. V., Emeline, A. V., & Bahnemann, D. W. (2022). Effect of the Heterovalent Doping of TiO2 with Sc3+ and Nb5+ on the Defect Distribution and Photocatalytic Activity. Catalysts, 12(5), 484. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12050484

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop