Next Article in Journal
Kinetics of Hydrogen Evolution Reaction on Monometallic Bulk Electrodes in Various Electrolytic Solutions
Previous Article in Journal
Nickel Glycerolate Overcoming a High-Entropy Configuration for High-Performance Oxygen Evolution Reaction
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mesoporous Copper-Cerium Mixed Oxide Catalysts for Aerobic Oxidation of Vanillyl Alcohol
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis and Characterization of Acid-Activated Carbon Prepared from Sugarcane Bagasse for Furfural Production in Aqueous Media

by
Thiago Alves Lopes Silva
1,
Adilson Candido da Silva
2 and
Daniel Pasquini
1,*
1
Chemistry Institute (IQ-UFU), Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia 38400-902, Brazil
2
Department of Chemistry, Institute of Exact and Biological Sciences (ICEB), Federal University of Ouro Preto—UFOP, Ouro Preto 35400-000, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2023, 13(10), 1372; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13101372
Submission received: 15 July 2023 / Revised: 1 October 2023 / Accepted: 10 October 2023 / Published: 17 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Catalytic Conversion of Biomass to Biofuels)

Abstract

:
Furfural is a platform molecule obtained from hemicellulosic monosaccharides present in lignocellulosic biomass. Due to the possibility of converting this molecule into several value-added chemicals and the need to search for more sustainable production processes, the present work aimed to produce and characterize different sulfonated activated carbons (AC-S) from sugarcane bagasse (SCB) for application in furfural production in aqueous media. ACs were produced by chemical activation using salts of ZnCl2, NiCl2, and CuCl2 and a temperature and activation time of 550 °C and 3 h under nitrogen flow, respectively. Sulfonation was carried out with H2SO4 (98%) at a solid/liquid ratio of 1:10 at 160 °C for 2 h. Catalytic tests were performed using 5% catalyst mass regarding xylose, a temperature of 180 °C, and a reaction time of 2 h. ACs with high surface areas, ranging from 290 to 1100 m2 g−1, were produced. All catalysts had an increased sulfur content and total acidity after sulfonation, indicating the successful attachment of the sulfonic group (-SO3H) in the carbon matrix of the CAs. The AC-S/CuCl2 catalyst achieved the best catalytic performance compared to AC-S/ZnCl2, AC-S/NiCl2, and other acidic solids reported in the literature, achieving yield and selectivity of 55.96% and 83.93%, respectively. These results evidence the importance of the synergy between the Lewis and Brønsted acid sites on selective xylose dehydration and make AC-S/CuCl2 a promising acid catalyst for converting xylose to furfural in an aqueous medium.

1. Introduction

Currently, lignocellulosic biomass (LCB) conversion into biofuels and platform molecules has attracted attention due to concerns about reducing fossil reserves and the environmental impacts caused by using non-renewable fuels [1,2,3]. LCB is mainly composed of cellulose (35–55%), hemicelluloses (20–40%), and lignin (15–25%) [4,5]. For the conversion of the three major components of LCB into fuels and platform molecules, a fractionation step is necessary to reduce their recalcitrance and make the catalytic conversion process more efficient [6,7].
Generally, after LCB fragmentation, the C6 sugar fraction released from cellulose is mainly used to produce second-generation ethanol, while the C5 sugar fraction of hemicelluloses is considered a raw material that is very important for the synthesis of valuable chemicals [8]. Among these chemicals synthesized from hemicellulosic monosaccharides (principally xylose), one of the most important is furfural (FF). FF is a renewable platform molecule that can be converted into several chemical inputs applied in the plastic industry, including fertilizers, pesticides, and pharmaceutical products. In addition, it is a precursor for different furanic compounds, such as furfuryl alcohol, tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol, 1,5-pentanediol, tetrahydrofuran, 2-methyl furan, maleic anhydride, furoic acid, and levulinic acid [9,10,11].
The industrial production of furfural started in 1921 by the Quaker Oats Company, using oat hulls as raw material subjected to high-pressure steam in the presence of sulfuric acid (H2SO4) [12,13]. In the global market for FF, China is the largest producer, followed by the Dominican Republic and South Africa. These three countries represent 90% of the production capacity in the world [14,15].
The current technology used in the industrial production of FF is based on the hydrolysis of biomass (corn cobs, sugarcane bagasse, oat hulls, wheat straw, peanut shells, cottonseed hull bran, cornstalks, etc.) [16,17], followed by dehydration of pentoses using a homogeneous Brønsted acid catalyst (mineral acids) in an aqueous medium. The homogeneous catalysis process has disadvantages, such as low yield (only ~50% of the theoretical furfural yield), corrosion of the industrial equipment, high energy demand, difficulty in separating the catalyst from the reaction medium, and high solvent (e.g., water, alkali) consumption for the pre-treatment of solid and liquid waste generated in the FF production process [13,18,19]. Therefore, to overcome the technology bottlenecks in commercial production, it is necessary to search for more efficient and sustainable catalytic processes, which increase the economic viability of converting carbohydrates into FF and improve its competition with petroleum-derived chemicals [20,21,22].
In this scenario, the use of heterogeneous acid catalysts for the selective dehydration of xylose into FF has gained more and more attention due to their high catalytic activity, low corrosivity, good thermostability, and ease of recycling and separation of the reaction medium [23,24]. Different heterogeneous catalysts applied to FF production have been reported in the literature, including zeolites, sulfonic ion exchange resins, mesoporous silicas modified with sulfonic acid, metallic oxides, and mesoporous niobium phosphate [15,23,25,26], and, more recently, carbonaceous materials derived from LCB [26,27,28,29,30,31], such as sulfonated activated carbons [32,33,34,35,36], which have high surface area and porosity, low production cost, and ease of performing surface chemical modifications. However, the primary limitation in the utilization of these acidic solids lies in their susceptibility to deactivation in aqueous and/or biphasic systems. In this perspective, the use of acid solids, such as sulfonated activated carbon obtained from LCB, can be a promising alternative to make the FF production process more sustainable and competitive.
In this context, the present work aimed to produce and characterize different sulfonated activated carbons obtained from sugarcane bagasse using a chemical activation method with zinc chloride (ZnCl2), copper chloride (CuCl2), and nickel chloride (NiCl2), as well as evaluate the application of these in the xylose dehydration reaction to obtain furfural. The main novelty of this study is carrying out the sulfonation process in activated carbon-containing metals remaining from the activation process, resulting in the single-step synthesis of heterogeneous catalysts with Lewis (metals) and Brønsted (sulfonic group) acid sites. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first approach reported to have produced AC-S without performing the leaching step of the activating agent before the direct functionalization with H2SO4. The elimination of this step contributes to reducing costs and making FF production more eco-friendly since it would be necessary to use hydrochloric acid (HCl) to remove metals and water to wash the catalyst until it reaches a neutral pH. In addition, the results of this study can contribute to obtaining more efficient and sustainable catalysts for furfural production in aqueous media, thus composing the portfolio of possibilities to produce this platform molecule.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Carbonization and Sulfonation Process Yields

Table 1 shows the yields of the carbonization and sulfonation processes.
The carbonization process yield using ZnCl2 and NiCl2 showed close values; however, they were lower than the yield obtained using CuCl2 as an activating agent. The observed yields are in the range reported for producing activated carbons by the chemical activation method with different precursor materials and activating agents, according to studies by Zhang et al. [37], Liew et al. [38], Norouzi et al. [39], Fu et al. [40], Benmahdi et al. [41], and Mbarki et al. [42].
AC/CuCl2 exhibited a lower sulfonation yield when compared to AC/NiCl2 and AC/ZnCl2, likely due to the reaction of metallic copper and H2SO4 with the loose carbon atoms in macro and mesopores of the carbonic structure initially formed. This reaction possibly initiates a new transverse or radial activation, thus forming a new microporous structure that promotes an increase in SBET [43]. Furthermore, it leads to the degradation of the carbon matrix and the removal of a significant portion of the remaining activating agent, resulting in a reduction in yield.

2.2. Catalyst Characterization

2.2.1. Textural Properties

The specific surface area (SBET), micropore area (Smicro), external area (Smeso), total pore volume (Vtot), micropore volume (Vmicro), and average pore diameter (dp) of the ACs before and after sulfonation are showed Table 2.
AC/ZnCl2 showed a specific surface area 3.6 times greater than those activated with NiCl2 and CuCl2. Obtaining AC with high SBET using ZnCl2 is reported in the literature [44,45] and attributed to the swelling of the molecular structure of cellulose, which causes the breaking of its lateral bonds and promotes the increase of intra- and inter-fibril spaces [46,47].
Luo et al. [48], Cai et al. [49], Abdel-Aziz et al. [50], Piriya et al. [51], Shudi and Wang [52], Kumar et al. [53], and Amoo et al. [54] also synthesized AC using ZnCl2 as an activating agent, however, obtained SBET smaller when compared with AC/ZnCl2. The textural properties results of AC/ZnCl2 and AC/NiCl2 (Table 2) are similar to those described by Thue et al. [55], who used sapelli sawdust impregnated with ZnCl2 and NiCl2 in a mass ratio of 1:1, and also produced ACs with SBET = 1123 m2 g−1 and 297 m2 g−1; Vtot = 0.54 cm3 g−1 and 0.22 cm3 g−1, and dp = 1.9 nm and 2.9 nm, respectively. Nonetheless, the AC produced with CuCl2 (1:1 w/w) showed higher SBET = 648 m2 g−1 and Vtot = 0.36 cm3 g−1 than those of this work, possibly due to the differences in the carbonization process and of the physicochemical characteristics of the precursor.
After sulfonation, there is a reduction in SBET, Vtot, and dp for AC-S/NiCl2 (Table 2), which suggests the insertion of sulfonic groups (-SO3H) on the surface and inside the pores [56]. While AC-S/ZnCl2 showed a reduction only in SBET. AC-S/CuCl2 had a significant increase in SBET, Vtot, and dp, which can be attributed to a new activation of AC promoted for the reaction of metallic copper and H2SO4, as described in Section 2.1.
The SBET reduction in carbonaceous materials after sulfonation was also reported in the studies by Niu et al. [57], Kolur et al. [58], Ferreira et al. [59], Higai et al. [60], and Zhang et al. [61], who related this reduction with the fixation of -SO3H on the surface and the degradation of the carbonic matrix by H2SO4.
Figure 1 shows the isotherms of adsorption and desorption of N2 for the activated carbons before and after sulfonation.
According to the IUPAC classification, the AC/ZnCl2 and AC-S/ZnCl2 (Figure 1b) have a type I(b) isotherm characteristic of microporous materials with wider micropores and possibly narrow mesopores. At the same time, AC/NiCl2, AC-S/NiCl2 (Figure 1a), AC/CuCl2, and AC-S/CuCl2 (Figure 1c) exhibit a type IV(a) isotherm, which is characteristic of mesoporous materials. The mesoporosity of AC/NiCl2, AC-S/NiCl2, is confirmed by the H3 hysteresis loop (before sulfonation) and H4 (after sulfonation), which also indicates a change from slit-shaped pores to narrow slit-shaped pores. AC/CuCl2 and AC-S/CuCl2 showed an H4 hysteresis loop, showing that sulfonation did not change the structure of the pores, which remained narrow in the form of a slit [62,63].

2.2.2. SEM-EDX Analysis

Figure 2 shows scanning electron microscopy and EDX composition obtained for the catalysts before and after functionalization. The porous structure of the ACS synthesized in this work is similar to other activated carbons produced with different carbon sources [64,65,66,67]. It is observed in micrographs of CA/NiCl2 (Figure 2a) and CA-S/NiCl2 (Figure 2d), which, after reaction with H2SO4, showed cracks and peeling of the internal layer of the pores (red arrows inserted in Figure 2d) due to partial degradation of the carbonic structure. The EDX maps show agglomerated nickel particles inside the pores (Figure 2a), but after sulfonation, the nickel was dispersed homogeneously on the sample surface (Figure 2d).
Figure 2e evidence that after sulfonation, there were no changes in the pore structure of AC/ZnCl2 (Figure 2b), but the zinc particles (blue arrows inserted in Figure 2b) from on the surface and interior of the pores (Figure 2b) were removed. The micrographs of AC/CuCl2 (Figure 2c) and AC-S/CuCl2 (Figure 2f) demonstrated the formation of a spongy structure inside some pores of the sulfonated sample (green arrows inserted in Figure 2f).
Comparing EDX maps in Figure 2c,f a high leaching of copper after treatment with H2SO4 is observed. The presence of the sulfur (S) element in all sulfonated samples (Figure 2d–f) suggests the insertion of -SOH3 groups in the matrix carbonic.

2.2.3. Elementary Analysis and Ion Exchange Capacity

Table 3 describes the results of the elemental chemical composition and total acidity for AC and AC-S samples. The sulfur content for all samples after the sulfonation process increased (Table 4), corroborating with the composition determined by EDX described in Section 2.2.2 and, thus, confirming the anchoring of -SO3H groups in the AC structure. The relationship between the increase in S content after sulfonation and the insertion of -SO3H groups observed in this study has been extensively reported in several works on the synthesis and characterization of acid solid carbon catalysts [30,33,68,69,70,71,72,73,74]. These studies highlight that the sulfur atoms added to the carbon matrix of the catalyst after sulfonation are likely contained in -SO3H groups generated and covalently linked by sp2 hybridization in the polycyclic carbon network.
Analyzing the results of total acidity and concentration of -SO3H groups in the sulfonated catalysts (Table 3), it was observed that AC-S/CuCl2 had the highest concentration of these groups, followed by AC-S/NiCl2 and AC-S/ZnCl2. The lower acidity and insertion of -SO3H groups in AC-S/NiCl2, even presenting higher S content compared to AC-S/CuCl2, indicates that some sulfonic groups of this catalyst have some steric impediment that made them unavailable for ion exchange reaction.

2.2.4. TGA Analysis

Thermogravimetric curves obtained in an inert atmosphere of the AC and AC-S are shown in Figure 3. The thermograms indicate that the AC-S initiates the thermal degradation of the carbonic structure at a temperature of approximately 200–220 °C. After sulfonation, all AC had their thermal stability reduced and a greater loss mass between 25–100 °C, indicating that these materials present more adsorbed water. The reduction in the thermal stability observed possibly occurred due to partial oxidation of the carbon structure caused by the sulfonation process [75], while the increase in the percentage of adsorbed water is a result of the insertion of -SO3H groups, which increase the hydrophilicity of AC [76].
In the TGA profile of AC-S/NiCl2 (Figure 3a) and CA-S/CuCl2 (Figure 3c), three thermal decomposition events are observed, the first (25 to 100 °C) attributed to the vaporization of the water physically adsorbed in the sample [76]. The second (100 to 450 °C) refers to the decomposition of the surface groups present in the AC, such as the carboxylic groups (100 to 200 °C), lactones groups (200 to 400 °C) [77], and sulphonic groups (200 to 450 °C) [78,79,80]. The third event (450 to 900 °C) is attributed to the decomposition of the carbonic structure. In the AC-S/ZnCl2 thermogram (Figure 3b), the occurrence of only two thermal events is observed; the first stage from 25 to 100 °C was due to the release of adsorbed water, and the second from 100 to 900 °C to the thermal decomposition of the carbonic matrix. The desulfonation process in this AC-S is possibly not observed due to the low incorporation of sulfonic groups (according to the result shown in Table 3) compared to the other sulfonated catalysts.

2.2.5. XRD and Raman Analysis

Figure 4a shows the XRD patterns of the activated carbons before and after sulfonation. The diffractograms of the AC/NiCl2, AC/ZnCl2, and AC/CuCl2 present, respectively, characteristic peaks of metallic nickel (Ni0, ICCD card 00-004-0850) at 2θ ≈ 44.50° (111), 51.84° (200), and 76.36° (220); zinc oxide (ZnO, ICCD card 00-036-1451) at 2θ ≈ 31.77° (100), 34.42° (002), 36.25° (101), 47.54° (102), 56.60° (110), 62.86° (103), 66.38° (200), and 69.10° (201); metallic copper (Cu0, ICCD card 00-004-0836) at 2θ ≈ 43.29° (111), 50.4° (200), and 74.13° (220). According to Thue et al. [81], the formation of Ni0, ZnO, and Cu0 is possibly associated with the occurrence of three main stages during the production of AC: the first is the impregnation of the activating agent in the biomass, which promotes the complexation of the metallic cation with the surface groups of cellulose, hemicelluloses (-OH, -COOH), and lignin (Ph-OH). The second consists of the decomposition of biomass during the carbonization process, in which gases are released, such as H2, CO2, CO, and CH4. Finally, in the third stage, reducing gases react with metallic cations at high temperatures, promoting the reduction of Ni2+ and Cu2+ to Ni0 and Cu0 particles, while Zn2+ forms ZnO particles. The presence of ZnO observed in the diffractograms is in line with the results related by Ngaosuwan et al. [82] and Yusuff et al. [73], while the identification of Ni0 was reported by Lima et al. [83] in AC samples produced with sapelli sawdust even after the application of activating agent leaching methods.
The average crystallite size (D) obtained by Scherer’s equation for Ni and Cu particles was 30.70 nm and 37.00 nm, respectively. After sulfonation, the D of the Ni and Cu particles reduced to 24.30 nm and 27.30 nm. The decrease in D in metallic particles after sulfonation with H2SO4 was also observed in studies by Varão et al. [80] and Ibrarrim et al. [84].
After sulfonation, two diffraction peaks at 2θ ≈ 20–25° and 2θ ≈ 40°–45° corresponding to Braggs reflection planes of (002) and (100) were observed, respectively. The (002) plane is attributed to the random order of aromatic carbon sheets and the (100) plane to amorphous carbon [85,86]. The characteristic peaks of ZnO are not observed in the diffractogram of AC-S/ZnCl2, indicating that H2SO4 promoted its complete leaching. In the diffractograms of AC-S/NiCl2 and AC-S/CuCl2, only a reduction in the intensity of the diffraction peaks of Ni0 and Cu0 is evident, suggesting partial leaching of these metals. These results corroborate the chemical composition data presented in Table 3. X-ray patterns of AC-S showed the characteristic peaks of the quartz (SiO2, ICCD card 00–001–0649), possibly contained in the biomass [83] or arising from the glass flask wear used for the sulfonation.
Raman spectra of the activated carbons before and after functionalized with H2SO4 are shown in Figure 4b. All samples display two broad peaks around 1350 cm−1 (D-band) and 1590 cm−1 (G-band). D-band is associated with amorphous and disordered carbon structure presenting in sp3-hybridized carbon (A1g symmetry), while G-band is attributed to the E2g symmetry and is related to the C-C stretching bond on ring and chain sp2- hybridized carbon [85,87,88]. The intensity ratios of the D-band and G-band (ID/IG–inserted in Figure 4b) indicate the disorder degree of the carbonic structure [85,87]. After sulfonation, all samples had a slight increase in the ID/IG ratio that can be attributed to the formation of new defects of the carbonic matrix due to the incorporation of the -SO3H group [89,90]. The slight increase in the ID/IG observed in this study was also reported by Li et al. [91], Bounoukta et al. [85], and Pi et al. [92].

2.3. Conversion of Xylose into Furfural

The results of the xylose conversion (C%), yield (Y%), and selectivity (S%) of furfural at 180 °C/2 h for the different acid catalysts are systematized in Table 4.
The C% and Y% for the uncatalyzed reaction were lower than those obtained for the sulfonated catalysts. The C% for AC-S/ZnCl2 and AC-S/CuCl2 decreased by 18.60 and 13.30%, respectively, while the AC-S/NiCl2 increased by 14.00%. Possibly, the reduction after sulfonation is related to the leaching of 100% of ZnO and 90% of Cu0 (see Table 4), which act as Lewis acid sites in the xylose conversion. Thus, the xylose conversion by these catalysts started to be carried out mainly by the Brønsted acid sites represented by the -SO3H group. In this perspective, the C% increase seen for CA-S/NiCl2 can be attributed to the synergy between Lewis acid sites (Ni0) [93] and Brønsted acid sites (-SO3H) present on this catalyst. According to Gabriel et al. [20], problems related to lower conversion values can be minimized by recirculating and submitting the unconverted substrate to a new reactional cycle.
All sulfonated samples had improved yield and selectivity to furfural compared with the non-sulfonated catalysts, but AC-S/NiCl2 and AC-S/CuCl2 showed better catalytic performance. The best catalytic activity of these acid solids is related to the simultaneous presence of Lewis and Brønsted acid sites because the dehydration mechanism of xylose into furfural can occur directly by a Brønsted acid site or in a cascade when xylose initially is isomerized into xylulose and lyxose by a Lewis acid site, and then dehydrated in the presence of a Brønsted acid site, being the second mechanism most favorable for the selective conversion of xylose to furfural [12]. The combination of Lewis and Brønsted acid sites in catalysts has been associated, in different studies available in the literature, with obtaining higher yield and selectivity values for the dehydration reaction from xylose to furfural [12,15,94,95,96].
Comparing the two acid catalysts with the best catalytic performance, it is observed that AC-S/CuCl2 presented higher values of Y% and S% for the reaction studied. The lower catalytic performance obtained for AC-S/NiCl2 may be associated with the formation of furan resins and condensation products generated by furfural degradation. The high selectivity obtained for AC-S/CuCl2 can reduce the costs of the furfural production process because when the catalyst has poor selectivity, it is necessary to install units for separating and purifying the product [20].
In Table 5, a comparison is made between the AC-S/CuCl2 catalyst and different heterogeneous acid catalysts reported in the literature.
Among the catalysts produced in this study and compared with the other acid solids catalysts reported in Table 5, the AC-S/CuCl2 proved to be a promising catalyst for furfural production from xylose since it reached the highest yield (55.96%) and selectivity (83.93%) values in an aqueous medium. This catalyst also showed better Y% and S% compared to the heterogeneous catalysts used in biphasic systems reported in the studies by Millán et al. [50], Sato et al. [100], and Lima et al. [101].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Precursor Material

The raw sugarcane bagasse (SCB) used as a precursor to obtain activated carbon was provided by the Jatiboca Sugar and Ethanol Plant (Urucânia, Minas Gerais, Brazil). The material was previously dried in the sun until it reached a humidity level below 15%; then, it was stored in plastic bags at room temperature.
The SCB used in this study contained 48.70% cellulose, 21.14% hemicelluloses, 24.81% lignin, 2.31% extractives, and 0.41% ash [103].

3.2. Preparation of Activated Carbon: Impregnation and Carbonization

Activated carbons (ACs) were obtained by the chemical activation method, as described by Thue et al. [55] and Oliveira et al. [104]. To prepare the ACs, 10.0 g (dry basis) of the SCB was impregnated with 150 mL of aqueous solutions containing the following activating agents: ZnCl2, NiCl2, and CuCl2, according to experimental conditions described in Table 6. Then, the material was placed on the heating plate under agitation to remove excess water and finally dried in an air circulation oven at 105 °C for 12 h.
After the impregnation process, the precursor material was carbonized in a tubular oven with a quartz tube at a temperature of 550 °C for 3 h under nitrogen flow. The material resulting from the carbonization process (AC) was macerated, washed with hot water to unblock the pores, and dried in an air circulation oven at 105 °C for 12 h.
The gravimetric yield of the activated carbon production process was calculated by Equation (1).
Y C = M AC M p ×   100
where YC represents the carbonization process yield of AC, MAC is the mass (dry base) of the AC after carbonization, and Mp is the mass (dry base) of the precursor.

3.3. Activated Carbon Sulfonation Process

The sulfonation of AC was performed by direct reaction with concentrated sulfuric acid (98%) in a solid/liquid ratio of 1:10, a temperature of 160 °C, and a reaction time of 2 h. After the reaction time, the AC was washed with distilled water until neutral pH and dried in an air circulation oven at 105 °C for 12 h, being called AC-S. The yield of the sulfonation process was calculated according to Equation (2).
Y S = M AC - S M AC ×   100
where YS is the yield of the sulfonation process, MAC is the mass of the AC before sulfonation (dry base), and MAC-S is the mass of the AC after sulfonation.

3.4. Catalyst Characterization

3.4.1. Textural Properties

The specific surface area, total volume pore, and pore average diameter of ACs before and after sulfonation were determined using Brunauer–Emmet–Teller (B.E.T.) and Barret–Joyner–Hallenda (B.J.H.) methods. Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms at −196 °C were obtained using ASAP 2020 equipment (Micromeritics).

3.4.2. Elemental Analysis

Carbon (C), hydrogen (H), nitrogen (N), and sulfur (S) contents of AC samples were determined by elemental analysis (CHNS) in 2400 Series II CHNS/O equipment (Perkin Elmer). The oxygen content (O) was obtained by difference, considering the summation of C, H, N, S, Cl, Si, Ni, Zn, and Cu.

3.4.3. Ion Exchange Capacity Analysis

The ion exchange capacity (IEC) of CA and CA-S was determined by acid-base titration according to the procedure adapted from González et al. [105] and Dechakhumwat et al. [106]. For determination of the IEC, a mass between 0.1 g and 0.2 g of AC was added to 20 mL of NaCl solution (1.0 M) and kept under stirring for 24 h. Subsequently, the mixture was filtered and titrated in triplicate with standard NaOH solution (0.05 mol L−1), using phenolphthalein as an indicator. The IEC was calculated according to Equation (3).
IEC   ( mmol / g ) =   V NaOH × M NaOH m
where VNaOH is the volume (L) of solution spent on titration, MNaOH is the solution molarity, and m(g) is the mass of the AC.
The density of the SO3H groups (mmol/g) incorporated in the AC after the sulfonation process was estimated by the difference between the IEC of the material before sulfonation and the IEC after functionalization, according to Equation (4).
SO 3 H   ( mmol / g ) = IEC 2 IEC 1
where IEC1 is the ion exchange capacity of AC before sulfonation, and IEC2 is the ion exchange capacity of AC after sulfonation.

3.4.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis (SEM)

The AC morphology was obtained using a Scanning Electron Microscope, model EVO 10 MA (Carl Zeiss, Jena, FRG), with a magnification of 1.00 KX and 5.00 KX and an acceleration voltage of 20 kV. The samples were fixed on metallic supports with double-sided carbon tape and metalized with a 75 nm gold layer.
The composition of Ni, Zn, Cu, Si, and Cl in the samples before and after sulfonation was determined by X-ray energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDX) using an Oxford detector, model 51-ADD0048 (Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK).

3.4.5. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

The evaluation of the thermal stability of the AC and AC-S in an inert atmosphere was performed on a Thermogravimetric Analyzer, model TGA 55 (TA Instruments, New Castle, USA). Approximately 6 mg of the samples were subjected to a heating ramp from 25 to 900 °C with a flow rate of 60 mL min−1 of nitrogen and a heating rate of 10 °C min−1.

3.4.6. X-ray Diffraction Analysis (XRD)

X-ray diffractograms of activated carbon after and before functionalization with sulfuric acid were obtained using an X-ray Diffractometer, model XRD-6000 (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) with 10–80° (2θ) range, scanning speed 2°/min, power of 40 kV with electric current of 30 mA, and Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å).
The average crystallite size of Ni and Cu particles in AC and AC-S were obtained, respectively, from the XRD patterns at 2θ ≈ 44.50° (111) and 2θ ≈ 43.29° (111) using Scherrer’s equation (Equation (5)) [55].
D = 0.9 λ / β   cos ( θ )
where D is the average crystallite size, λ is the wavelength of the X-ray, θ is the angle obtained from 2θ value corresponding to the XRD pattern, and β is the full width at half maximum (FWHM).

3.4.7. Raman Spectroscopy Analysis

Raman scattering measurements were performed at room temperature in a Raman Spectrophotometer, model Labram HR Evolution (Horiba Scientific, Kyoto, Japan), equipped with a CCD detector. Raman spectra were obtained in the excitation line of 532 nm [107], spectral resolution of 0.01 cm−1, incidence power of 1.7 mW, and four accumulations were performed with a time of 20 s for each spectrum in the region of 800 to 2200 cm−1. The structural defects of the AC and AC-S were determined by the relationship between intensities of the ID/IG bands.

3.5. Application of Activated Carbon for Conversion of Xylose to Furfural

3.5.1. Experimental Conditions

The reactions of the production of furfuraldehyde from the xylose dehydration were conducted in a Parr 4848 reactor (Parr Instrument Company, Moline, USA) with a capacity of 450 mL and equipped with a heating system, magnetic stirring, and temperature controller. The xylose dehydration tests were performed using a mass percentage of catalyst/xylose corresponding to 5%. To perform the test, 30 mL of an aqueous solution of xylose was added to the reactor along with 0.05 g of catalyst. The mixture was then bubbled with nitrogen gas (N2) for 5 min to remove dissolved gases that could interfere with the dehydration reaction. Afterward, the reaction mixture was heated to 180 °C, with an average time to reach the working temperature of 65 min, and maintained at that temperature for 2 h. Reaction conditions were defined based on previous studies of Termividchakorn et al. [27] and Lin et al. [33].
Posteriorly, the mixture was filtered through quantitative filter paper to separate the activated carbon. The liquid fraction was filtered again using Millipore® filters (0.20μm) and then frozen for later determination of the xylose and furfural concentration.

3.5.2. Determination of Xylose and Furfural

The xylose and furfural concentration were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using a Shimadzu Chromatograph coupled to a refractive index detector (RID-10A), diode array detector (SPD-M20A) (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan), and Supelcogel C610 column-H (30 cm × 7.8 mm) (Sigma-Aldrich, Bellefonte, USA). The xylose separation was carried out at 32 °C using a RID-10A detector with an aqueous phosphoric acid solution (0.1% v/v) at a flow rate of 0.5 mL.min−1, while the determination of furfural was performed at 55 °C in a PDA detector (274 nm) with an aqueous sulfuric acid solution (5 mmol L−1) at a flow rate of 0.6 mL min−1.
Xylose conversion (C%), yield (Y%), and selectivity (S%) furfural were determined, respectively, by Equations (6)–(8) [108].
C ( % ) = C xi   C xf C xi   × 100
Y ( % ) = C F   C xi   × 100
S ( % ) = furfural   yield xylose   conversion ×   100
where Cxi is the initial concentration of xylose (mol L−1), Cxf is the final concentration of xylose (mol L−1), and CF is the concentration of furfural produced.

4. Conclusions

In this study, three AC-S were prepared from the sugarcane bagasse for application in the dehydration of xylose in furfural. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first reported approach that synthesized AC-S without performing the activating agent leaching step before direct functionalization with H2SO4, thus enabling the obtainment of single-step catalysts with Lewis and Brønsted acid sites represented, respectively, by the metals and the -SO3H group. The textural properties determined by BET and BJH methods showed that ACs activated using ZnCl2 are classified as a microporous material with high SBET (1055 m2 g−1 to 1100 m2 g−1), while ACs produced with NiCl2 and CuCl2 have lower SBET (290 m2 g−1 to 440 m2 g−1) and are mesoporous materials. The insertion of -SO3H groups in the carbonic matrix by the direct sulfonation method was successfully performed, as evidenced in the techniques of EDX, TGA, elemental analysis, and ion exchange capacity. X-ray diffraction analysis showed that ACs have an amorphous structure. SEM-EDX and Raman analyses evidenced that the sulfonation process did not cause significant structural changes in the ACs.
Among the catalysts studied, the AC-S/CuCl2 showed the best catalytic performance for furfural production in an aqueous medium at 180 °C/2 h, reaching a xylose conversion of 66.67%, yield and selectivity of 55.96% and 83.93%, respectively. Given the search for technologies and processes that convert lignocellulosic residues in a green and sustainable way into biofuels and value-added chemicals, the results of this study may contribute to the development of heterogeneous catalysts that provide the selective conversion of xylose into furfural, such as the AC-S/CuCl2 produced in this work.

Author Contributions

T.A.L.S.: conceptualization, methodology, validation, formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. A.C.d.S.: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, resources, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, supervision. D.P.: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, resources, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financed in part by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brazil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Rede de Laboratórios Multiusuários (RELAM/PROPP) at the Federal University of Uberlândia for providing the equipment and technical support for the experiments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lee, C.B.T.L.; Wu, T.Y. A review on solvent systems for furfural production from lignocellulosic biomass. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 137, 110172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, F.; Ouyang, D.; Zhou, Z.; Page, S.J.; Liu, D.; Zhao, X. Lignocellulosic biomass as sustainable feedstock and materials for power generation and energy storage. J. Energy Chem. 2021, 57, 247–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yang, T.; Li, W.; Ogunbiyi, A.T.; An, S. Efficient catalytic conversion of corn stover to furfural and 5-hydromethylfurfural using glucosamine hydrochloride derived carbon solid acid in Ƴ-valerolactone. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 161, 113173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Okolie, J.A.; Nanda, S.; Dalai, A.K.; Kozinsk, J.A. Chemistry and specialty industrial applications of lignocellulosic biomass. Waste Biomass Valorization 2021, 12, 2145–2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ashokkumar, V.; Venkatkarthick, R.; Jayashree, S.; Chuetor, S.; Dharmaraj, S.; Kumar, G.; Chen, W.-H.; Ngamcharussrivichai, C. Recent advances in lignocellulosic biomass for biofuels and value-added bioproducts—A critical review. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 34, 126195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Perez, R.F.; Canhaci, S.J.; Borges, L.E.P.; Fraga, M.A. One-step conversion of xylose to furfuryl alcohol on sulfated zirconia-supported Pt catalyst—Balance between acid and metal sites. Catal. Today 2017, 289, 273–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Deng, W.; Feng, Y.; Fu, J.; Guo, H.; Guo, Y.; Han, B.; Jiang, Z.; Kong, L.; Li, C.; Liu, H.; et al. Catalytic conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into chemicals and fuels. Green Energy Environ. 2022, 8, 10–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Perez, R.F.; Fraga, M.A. Hemicellulose-derived chemicals: One-step production of furfuryl alcohol from xylose. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 3942–3950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lee, Y.; Kwon, E.E.; Lee, J. Polymers derived from hemicellulosic parts of lignocellulosic biomass. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2019, 18, 317–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sai, M.S.N.; De, D.; Satyavathi, B. Sustainable production and purification of furfural from waste agricultural residue: An insight into integrated biorefinery. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 327, 129467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lei, Y.; Yiwen, H.; Xiaotong, W.; Xuebin, L.; Xinhua, Q.; Hongbing, Y. Recent progress in furfural production from hemicellulose and its derivatives: Conversion mechanism, catalytic system, solvent selection. Mol. Catal. 2021, 515, 111899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Choudhary, V.; Sandler, S.I.; Vlachos, D.G. Conversion of xylose to furfural using Lewis and Brønsted acid catalysts in aqueous media. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 2022–2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rachamontree, P.; Douzou, T.; Cheenkachorn, K.; Sriariyanun, M.; Rattanaporn, K. Furfural: A sustainable platform chemical and fuel. Appl. Sci. Eng. Prog. 2020, 13, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mamman, A.S.; Lee, J.-M.; Kim, Y.-C.; Hwang, I.T.; Park, N.-J.; Hwang, Y.K.; Chang, J.-S.; Hwang, J.-S. Furfural: Hemicellulose/xylose derived biochemical. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin. 2008, 2, 438–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mariscal, R.; Maireles-Torres, P.; Ojeda, M.; Sádaba, I.; Granados, M.L. Furfural: A renewable and versatile platform molecule for the synthesis of chemicals and fuels. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 1144–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ge, X.; Chang, C.; Zhang, L.; Cui, S.; Luo, X.; Hu, S.; Qin, Y.; Li, Y. Conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into platform chemicals for biobased polyurethane application. In Advances in Bioenergy, 1st ed.; Li, Y., Zhou, Y., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdã, The Netherlands, 2018; Volume 3, pp. 161–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yong, K.J.; Wu, T.Y.; Lee, C.B.T.L.; Lee, Z.J.; Liu, Q.; Jahim, J.M.D.; Zhou, Q.; Zhang, L. Furfural production from biomass residues: Current technologies, challenges and future prospects. Biomass Bioenergy 2022, 161, 106458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, L.; Xi, G.; Yu, K.; Yu, H.; Wang, X. Furfural production from biomass–derived carbohydrates and lignocellulosic residues via heterogeneous acid catalysts. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 98, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lyu, X.; Botte, G.G. Investigation of factors that inhibit furfural production using metal chloride catalysts. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 403, 126271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gabriel, J.B.; Oliveira, V.; de Souza, T.E.; Padula, I.; Oliveira, L.C.A.; Gurgel, L.V.A.; Baêta, B.E.L.; Silva, A.C. New Approach to dehydration of xylose to 2-furfuraldehyde using a mesoporous niobium-based catalyst. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 21392–21400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liang, J.; Zha, J.; Zhao, N.; Tang, Z.; He, Y.; Ma, C. Valorization of waste lignocellulose to furfural by sulfonated biobased heterogeneous catalyst using ultrasonic-treated chestnut shell waste as carrier. Processes 2021, 9, 2269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, T.; Li, W.; Xiao, H.; Jin, Y.; Wu, S. Recent progress in direct production of furfural from lignocellulosic residues and hemicellulose. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 354, 127126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gong, L.; Zha, J.; Pan, L.; Ma, C.; He, Y.-C. Highly efficient conversion of sunflower stalk-hydrolysate to furfural by sunflower stalk residue-derived carbonaceous solid acid in deep eutectic solvent/organic solvent system. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 351, 126945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zha, J.; Fan, B.; He, J.; He, Y.-C.; Ma, C. Valorization of biomass to furfural by chestnut shell-based solid acid in methyl isobutyl ketone–water–sodium chloride system. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2022, 194, 2021–2035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Romo, J.E.; Bollar, N.V.; Zimmermann, C.J.; Wettstein, S.G. Conversion of sugars and biomass to furans using heterogeneous catalysts in biphasic solvent systems. ChemCatChem 2018, 10, 4805–4816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xu, H.; Xiong, S.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, L.; Wang, S. Conversion of xylose to furfural catalyzed by carbon-based solid acid prepared from pectin. Energy Fuels 2021, 35, 9961–9969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Termvidchakorn, C.; Itthibenchapong, V.; Songtawee, S.; Chamnankid, B.; Namuangruk, S.; Faungnawakij, K.; Charinpanitkul, T.; Khunchit, R.; Hansupaluk, N.; Sano, N.; et al. Dehydration of D-xylose to furfural using acid-functionalized MWCNTs catalysts. Adv. Nat. Sci. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2017, 8, 035006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lin, Q.; Li, H.; Wang, X.; Jian, L.; Ren, J.; Liu, C.; Sun, R. SO4-2/Sn-MMT solid acid catalyst for xylose and xylan conversion into furfural in the biphasic system. Catalyst 2017, 7, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tran, T.T.V.; Kongparakul, S.; Reubroycharoen, P.; Guan, G.; Nguyen, M.H.; Chanlek, N.; Samart, C. Production of furan based biofuel with an environmental benign carbon catalyst. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2018, 37, 1455–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dulie, N.W.; Woldeyes, B.; Demsash, H.D. Synthesis of lignin-carbohydrate complex-based catalyst from Eragrostis tef straw and its catalytic performance in xylose dehydration to furfural. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 171, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Yang, X.; Guo, H.; Cao, X.; Ma, Y.; Wang, W.; Guo, N. Solid acid catalyst derived from cotton for conversion of xylose and corn cob to furfural. ChemistrySelect 2022, 7, e202203762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhu, Y.; Li, W.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, T.; Jameel, H.; Chang, H.; Ma, L. Production of furfural from xylose and corn stover catalyzed by a novel porous carbon solid acid in γ-valerolactone. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 29916–29924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lin, Q.-X.; Zhang, C.-H.; Wang, X.-H.; Cheng, B.-G.; Mai, N.; Ren, J.-L. Impact of activation on properties of carbon-based solid acid catalysts for the hydrothermal conversion of xylose and hemicelluloses. Catal. Today 2019, 319, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, Q.; Ma, C.-L.; Zhang, P.-Q.; Li, Y.-Y.; Zhu, X.; He, Y.-C. Effective conversion of sugarcane bagasse to furfural by coconut shell activated carbon-based solid acid for enhancing whole-cell biosynthesis of furfurylamin. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 160, 113169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chung, N.H.; Dien, L.Q.; Que, N.T.; Thanh, N.T.; Ly, G.T.P. Comparative study on the conversion of Acacia mangium wood sawdust-derived xylose-containing acid hydrolysate to furfural by sulfonated solid catalysts prepared from different lignocellulosic biomass residues. Wood Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 659–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, W.; Cao, X.; Guo, H.; Yang, X.; Guo, N.; Ma, Y. Carbon-based solid acid derived from lignin and polyvinyl chloride for conversion of xylose and crop wastes to furfural. Mol. Catal. 2022, 524, 112329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, Z.; Luo, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, P.; Ma, G.; Lei, Z.; Lei, L. A low cost and highly eficiente adsorbent (activated carbon) prepared from waste potato residue. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2015, 49, 206–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liew, R.K.; Azwar, E.; Yek, P.N.Y.; Lim, X.Y.; Cheng, C.K.; Ng, J.-H.; Jusoh, A.; Lam, W.H.; Ibrahim, M.D.; Ma, N.L.; et al. Microwave pyrolysis with KOH/NaOH mixture activation: A new approach to produce micro-mesoporous activated carbon for textile dye adsorption. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 266, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Norouzi, S.; Heidari, M.; Alipour, V.; Rahmanian, O.; Fazlzadeh, M.; Mohammadi-moghadam, F.; Nourmoradi, H.; Goudarzi, B.; Dindarloo, K. Preparation, characterization and Cr(VI) adsorption evaluation of NaOH-activated carbon produced from Date Press Cake; an agro-industrial waste. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 258, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Fu, Y.; Shen, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Ge, X.; Chen, M. Activated bio-chars derived from rice husk via one-and two-step KOH-catalyzed pyrolysis for phenol adsorption. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 646, 1567–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Benmahdi, F.; Oulmi, K.; Khettaf, S.; Kolli, M.; Merdrignac-Conanec, O.; Mandin, P. Synthesis and characterization of microporous granular activated carbon from Silver berry seeds using ZnCl2 activation. Fuller Nanotub. Carbon Nanostruct. 2021, 29, 657–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mbarki, F.; Selim, T.; Kesraoui, A.; Seffen, M. Low-cost activated carbon preparation from Corn stigmata fibers chemically activated using H3PO4, ZnCl2 and KOH: Study of methylene blue adsorption, stochastic isotherm and fractal kinetic. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 178, 114546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, B.; Gu, J.; Zhou, J. High surface area rice husk-based activated carbon prepared by chemical activation with ZnCl2–CuCl2 composite activator. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2016, 35, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhao, H.; Zhong, H.; Jiang, Y.; Li, H.; Tang, P.; Li, D.; Feng, Y. Porous ZnCl2-activated carbon from shaddock peel: Methylene blue adsorption behavior. Materials 2022, 15, 895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yagmur, E.; Gokce, Y.; Tekin, S.; Isik, S.N.; Aktas, Z. Characteristics and comparison of activated carbons prepared from oleaster (Elaeagnus angustifolia L.) fruit using KOH and ZnCl2. Fuel 2020, 267, 117232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Saka, C. BET, TG–DTG, FT-IR, SEM, iodine number analysis and preparation of activated carbon from acorn shell by chemical activation with ZnCl2. J. Anal Appl. Pyrolysis 2012, 95, 21–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Heidarinejad, Z.; Dehghani, M.H.; Heidari, M.; Javedan, G.; Ali, I.; Sillanpää, M. Methods for preparation and activation of activated carbon: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2020, 18, 393–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Luo, X.; Cai, Y.; Liu, L.; Zeng, J. Cr(VI) adsorption performance and mechanism of an effective activated carbon prepared from bagasse with a one-step pyrolysis and ZnCl2 activation method. Celulose 2019, 26, 4921–4934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cai, Y.; Liu, L.; Tian, H.; Yang, Z.; Luo, X. Adsorption and Desorption Performance and Mechanism of Tetracycline Hydrochloride by Activated Carbon-Based Adsorbents Derived from Sugar Cane Bagasse Activated with ZnCl2. Molecules 2019, 24, 4534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Abdel-Aziz, M.H.; El-Ashtoukhy, E.Z.; Bassyouni, M.; Al-Hossalny, A.F.; Fawzy, E.M.; Abdel-Hamld, S.M.S.; Zoromba, M.S. DFT and experimental study on adsorption of dyes on activated carbon prepared from apple leaves. Carbon Lett. 2021, 31, 863–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Piriya, S.R.; Rajamani, M.; Jayabalakrishnan, M.M.; Boomiraj, K.; Oumabady, S. Coconut shell derived ZnCl2 activated carbon for malachite green dye removal. Water Sci. Technol. 2021, 83, 1167–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Suhdi, W.S.-C. Fine activated carbon from rubber fruit shell prepared by using ZnCl2 and KOH activation. Aplic. Sci. 2021, 11, 3994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kumar, D.P.; Ramesh, D.; Subramanian, P.; Karthikeyan, S.; Surendrakumar, A. Activated carbon production from coconut leaflets through chemical activation: Process optimization using Taguchi approach. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2022, 19, 101155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Amoo, T.E.; Amoo, K.O.; Adeeyo, O.A.; Ogidi, C.O. Kinetics and equilibrium studies of the adsorption of copper (ii) ions from industrial wastewater using activated carbons derived from sugarcane bagasse. Int. J. Chem. Eng. 2002, 2022, 6928568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Thue, P.S.; Lima, E.C.; Sieliechi, J.M.; Saucier, C.; Dias, S.L.P.; Vaghetti, J.C.P.; Rodembusch, F.S.; Pavan, F.A. Effects of first-row transition metals and impregnation ratios on the physicochemical properties of microwave-assisted activated carbons from wood biomass. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 486, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mateo, W.; Lei, H.; Villota, E.; Qian, M.; Zhao, Y.; Huo, E.; Zhang, Q.; Lin, X.; Wang, C.; Huang, Z. Synthesis and characterization of sulfonated activated carbon as a catalyst for bio-jet fuel production from biomass and waste plastics. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 297, 122411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Niu, S.; Ning, Y.; Lu, C.; Han, K.; Yu, H.; Zhou, Y. Esterification of oleic acid to produce biodiesel catalyzed by sulfonated activated carbon from bamboo. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 163, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kolur, A.; Sharifian, S.; KaghazchI, T. Investigation of sulfuric acid-treated activated carbon properties. Turk. J. Chem. 2019, 43, 663–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ferreira, A.R.; Silvestre-Albero, J.; Maier, M.E.; Ricardo, N.M.; Cavalcante, C.L.; Luna, F.M.T. Sulfonated activated carbons as potential catalysts for biolubricant synthesis. Mol. Catal. 2020, 488, 110888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Higai, D.; Lee, C.; Lang, J.; Qian, E.W. Saccharification of cellulose using biomass-derived activated carbon-based solid acid catalysts. Fuel Process. Technol. 2021, 215, 106738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhang, T.; Wei, H.; Gao, J.; Chen, S.; Jin, Y.; Deng, C.; Wu, S.; Xiao, H.; Li, W. Synthesis of sulfonated hierarchical carbons and theirs application on the production of furfural from wheat straw. Mol. Catal. 2022, 517, 112034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sing, K.S.W.; Everett, D.H.; Haul, R.A.W.; Moscou, L.; Pierotti, R.A.; Rouquérol, J.; Siemieniewska, T. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity. Pure Appl. Chem. 1985, 7, 603–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Thommes, M.; Kaneko, K.; Neimark, A.V.; Olivier, J.P.; Rodriguez-Reinoso, F.; Rouquerol, J.; Sing, K.S. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2015, 87, 1051–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Schultz, J.; Capobianco, G.; da Silva Veiga, P.A.; Fornari, M.R.; Antonangelo, A.R.; Tebcherani, S.M.; Mangrich, A.S.; Pinaro, A.S. Sustainable activated carbon obtained as a by-product of the sugar and alcohol industry for removal of amoxicillin from aqueous solution. Energy Ecol. Environ. 2020, 5, 433–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. El Nemr, A.; Aboughaly, R.M.; El Sikaily, A.; Ragab, S.; Masoud, M.S.; Ramadan, M.S. Utilization of sugarcane bagasse/ZnCl2 for sustainable production of microporous nano-activated carbons of type I for toxic Cr(VI) removal from aqueous environment. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 2021, 13, 1581–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ahuja, V.; Kshirsagar, S.; Ghosh, P.; Sarkar, B.; Sutar, A.; More, S.; Dasgupta, D. Process development for detoxification of corncob hydrolysate using activated charcoal for xylitol production. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 107097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Jamnongkan, T.; Intaramongkol, N.; Kanjanaphong, N.; Ponjaroen, K.; Sriwiset, W.; Mongkholrattanasit, R.; Wongwachirakorn, P.; Lin, K.Y.A.; Huang, C.F. Study of the enhancements of porous structures of activated carbons produced from durian husk wastes. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wang, Y.-T.; Fang, Z.; Zhang, F. Esterification of oleic acid to biodiesel catalyzed by a highly acidic carbonaceous catalyst. Catal. Today 2019, 319, 172–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Xincheng, T.; Shengli, N. Preparation of carbon-based solid acid with large surface area to catalyze esterification for biodiesel production. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2019, 69, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Farabi, M.A.; Ibrahim, M.L.; Rashid, U.; Taufoiq-Yap, Y. Esterification of palm fatty acid distillate using sulfonated carbon-based catalyst derived from palm kernel shell and bamboo. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 181, 562–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kong, X.; Vasudevan, S.V.; Cao, M.; Cai, J.; Mao, H.; Bu, Q. Microwave-assisted efficient fructose–hmf conversion in water over sulfonated carbon microsphere catalyst. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 15344–15356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Leesing, R.; Somdee, T.; Siwina, S.; Ngernyen, Y.; Fiala, K. Production of 2G and 3G biodiesel, yeast oil, and sulfonated carbon catalyst from waste coconut meal: An integrated cascade biorefinery approach. Renew. Energy 2022, 199, 1093–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Yusuff, A.S.; Thompson-Yusuff, K.A.; Porwal, J. Sulfonated biochar catalyst derived from eucalyptus tree shed bark: Synthesis, characterization and its evaluation in oleic acid esterification. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 10237–10248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Sangsiri, P.; Laosiripojana, N.; Daorattanachai, P. Synthesis of sulfonated carbon-based catalysts from organosolv lignin and methanesulfonic acid: Its activity toward esterification of stearic acid. Renew. Energy 2022, 193, 113–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Xiong, X.; Yu, I.K.M.; Chen, S.S.; Tsang, D.C.W.; Cao, L.; Song, H.; Kwon, E.E.; OK, Y.S.; Zhang, S.; Poon, C.S. Sulfonated biochar as acid catalyst for sugar hydrolysis and dehydration. Catal. Today 2018, 314, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Rocha, P.D.; Oliveira, L.S.; Franca, A.S. Sulfonated activated carbon from corn cobs as heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production using microwave-assisted transesterification. Renew. Energy 2019, 143, 1710–1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Van, K.L.; Thu, T.L.T. Preparation of pore-size controllable activated carbon from rice husk using dual activating agent and its application in supercapacitor. J. Chem. 2019, 2019, 4329609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Lokman, I.M.; Rashid, U.; Taufiq-Yap, Y.H. Meso- and macroporous sulfonated starch solid acid catalyst for esterification of palm fatty acid distillate. Árabe J. Chem. 2016, 9, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lima, A.P.; Tirone, A.V.; Batista, A.C.F.; Morais, L.C.; Souza, P.P.; Duarte, M.V.F.; Pasquini, D. Produção, caracterização e utilização de membranas de poliestireno sulfonado e polissulfona como catalisadores na reação de esterificação do ácido oleico. Rev. Virtual Química 2018, 10, 124–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Varão, L.H.R.; Silva, T.A.L.; Zamora, H.D.Z.; de Morais, L.C.; Pasquini, D. Synthesis of methyl biodiesel by esterification using magnetic nanoparticles coated with sulfonated lignin. Biomassa Conv. Bioref. 2023, 13, 12277–12290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Thue, P.S.; Umpierres, C.B.; Lima, E.C.; Lima, D.R.; Machado, F.M.; dos Reis, G.S.; da Silva, R.S.; Pavan, F.A.; Tran, H.N. Single-step pyrolysis for producing magnetic activated carbon from tucumã (Astrocaryum aculeatum) seed and nickel(II) chloride and zinc(II) chloride. Application for removal of nicotinamide and propanolol. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 398, 122903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ngaosuwan, K.; Goodmin, J.G., Jr.; Prasertdham, P. A green sulfonated carbon-based catalyst derived from coffee residue for esterification. Renew. Energy 2016, 86, 262–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Lima, D.R.; Lima, E.C.; Thue, P.S.; Dias, S.L.P.; Machado, F.M.; Seliem, M.K.; Sher, G.; dos Reis, G.S.; Saeb, M.; Rinklebe, J. Comparison of acidic leaching using a conventional and ultrasound-assisted method for preparation of magnetic-activated biochar. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ibrahim, S.F.; Asikin-Mijan, N.; Ibrahim, M.L.; Abdulkareem-Alsultan, G.; Izham, S.M.; Taufiq-Yap, Y.H. Sulfonated functionalization of carbon derived corncob residue via hydrothermal synthesis route for esterification of palm fatty acid distillate. Energy Convers. Manag. 2020, 210, 112698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Bounoukta, C.E.; Megías-Sayago, C.; Ivanova, S.; Penkova, A.; Ammari, F.; Centeno, M.A.; Odriozola, J.A. Effect of the sulphonating agent on the catalytic behavior of activated carbons in the dehydration reaction of fructose in DMSO. Appl. Catal. A Gene. 2021, 617, 118108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhu, S.; Xu, J.; Kuang, Y.; Cheng, Z.; Wu, Q.; Xie, J.; Wang, B.; Gao, W.; Zeng, J.; Li, J.; et al. Lignin-derived sulfonated porous carbon from cornstalk for efficient and selective removal of cationic dyes. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 159, 113071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Rawal, S.; Joshi, B.; Kumar, Y. Synthesis and characterization of activated carbon from the biomass of Saccharum bengalense for electrochemical supercapacitors. J. Energy Storage 2018, 20, 418–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Medhat, A.; El-Maghrabi, H.H.; Abdelghany, A.; Menem, N.M.A.; Raynaud, P.; Moustafa, Y.M.; Elsayed, M.A.; Nada, A.A. Efficiently activated carbons from corn cob for methylene blue adsorption. Appl. Surf. Sci. Adv. 2021, 3, 100037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Nahavandi, M.; Kasanneni, T.; Yuan, Z.S.; Xu, C.C.; Rohani, S. Efficient conversion of glucose into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural using a sulfonated carbon-based solid acid catalyst: An experimental and numerical study. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 1970–11984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Qin, L.; Ishizaki, T.; Takeuchi, N.; Takahashi, K.; Kim, K.H.; Li, O.L. Green Sulfonation of Carbon Catalysts via Gas–Liquid Interfacial Plasma for Cellulose Hydrolysis. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 5837–5846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Li, N.; Wang, Q.; Ullah, S.; Zheng, X.-C.; Peng, Z.-K.; Zheng, G.-P. Esterification of levulinic acid in the production of fuel additives catalyzed by porous sulfonated carbon derived from pine needle. Catal. Commun. 2019, 129, 105755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Pi, Y.; Liu, W.; Wang, J.; Peng, G.; Jiang, D.; Guo, R.; Yin, D. Preparation of activated carbon-based solid sulfonic acid and its catalytic performance in biodiesel preparation. Front. Chem. 2022, 10, 944398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Amin, K.A.; Wijaya, K.; Trisunaryanti, W. The catalytic performance of ZrO2-SO4 and Ni/ZrO2-SO4 prepared from commercial ZrO2 in Hydrocracking of LDPE plastic waste into liquid fuels. Orient. J. Chem. 2018, 34, 3070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Li, X.; Yang, J.; Xu, R.; Lu, L.; Kong, F.; Liang, M.; Jiang, L.; Nie, S.; Si, C. Kinetic study of furfural production from Eucalyptus sawdust using H-SAPO-34 as solid Brønsted acid and Lewis acid catalysts in biomass-derived solvents. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 135, 196–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Sun, K.; Shao, Y.; Liu, P.; Zhang, L.; Gao, G.; Dong, D.; Zhan, S.; Hu, G.; Xu, L.; Hu, X. A solid iron salt catalyst for selective conversion of biomass-derived C5 sugars to furfural. Fuel 2021, 300, 120990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Lee, C.B.T.L.; Wu, T.Y.; Yong, K.J.; Cheng, C.K.; Siow, L.F.; Jahim, J.M. Investigation into Lewis and Brønsted acid interactions between metal chloride and aqueous choline chloride-oxalic acid for enhanced furfural production from lignocellulosic biomass. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 827, 154049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Pholjaroen, B.; Li, N.; Wang, Z.; Wang, A.; Zhang, T. Dehydration of xylose to furfural over niobium phosphate catalyst in biphasic solvent system. J. Energy Chem. 2013, 22, 826–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Hu, X.; Westerhof, R.J.M.; Dong, D.; Wu, L.; Li, C.-Z. Acid-catalyzed conversion of xylose in 20 solvents: Insight into interactions of the solvents with xylose, furfural, and the acid catalyst. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2014, 2, 2562–2575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. García-Sancho, C.; Agirrezabal-Telleria, I.; Güemez, M.B.; Maireles-Torres, P. Dehydration of D-xylose to furfural using different supported niobia catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 152–153, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Sato, O.; Mimura, N.; Masuda, Y.; Shirai, M.; Yamaguchi, A. Effect of extraction on furfural production by solid acid-catalyzed xylose dehydration in water. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2019, 144, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. de Lima, L.F.; Lima, J.L.M.; Jorqueira, D.S.S.; Landers, R.; Moya, S.F.; Suppino, R.S. Use of amorphous Nb2O5 and Nb2O5/Al2O3 as acid catalysts for the dehydration of xylose to furfural. React. Kinet. Mech. Cat. 2021, 132, 73–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Wang, X.; Qiu, M.; Tang, Y.; Yang, J.; Shen, F.; Qi, X.; Yu, Y. Synthesis of sulfonated lignin-derived ordered mesoporous carbon for catalytic production of furfural from xylose. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 187, 232–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Bittencourt, G.A.; Barreto, E.S.; Brandão, R.L.; Baêta, B.E.L.; Gurgel, L.V.A. Fractionation of sugarcane bagasse using hydrothermal and advanced oxidative pretreatments for bioethanol and biogas production in lignocellulose biorefineries. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 292, 121963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Oliveira, L.C.A.; Pereira, E.; Guimaraes, I.R.; Vallone, A.; Pereira, M.; Mesquita, J.P.; Sapag, K. Preparation of activated carbons from coffee husks utilizing FeCl3 and ZnCl2 as activating agentes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 165, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. González, M.E.; Cea, M.; Reyes, D.; Romero-Hermoso, L.; Hidalgo, P.; Meier, S.; Benito, N.; Navia, R. Functionalization of biochar derived from lignocellulosic biomassusing microwave t echnology for catalytic application in biodiesel production. Energy Convers. Manag. 2017, 137, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Dechakhumwat, S.; Hongmanorom, P.; Thunyaratchatanon, C.; Smith, S.M.; Boonyuen, S.; Luengnaruemitchai, A. Catalytic activity of heterogeneous acid catalysts derived from corncob in the esterification of oleic acid with methanol. Renew. Energy 2020, 148, 897–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Damodar, D.; Kunamalla, A.; Varkolu, M.; Maity, S.K.; Deshpande, A.S. Near-room-temperature synthesis of sulfonated carbon nanoplates and their catalytic application. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 15, 12707–12717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Millán, G.G.; Phiri, J.; Mäkelä, M.; Maloney, T.; Balu, A.M.; Pineda, A.; Llorca, J.; Sixta, H. Furfural production in a biphasic system using a carbonaceous solid acid catalyst. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2019, 585, 117180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms for (a) AC/NiCl2 and AC-S/NiCl2, (b) AC/ZnCl2 and AC-S/ZnCl2, (c) AC/CuCl2 and AC-S/CuCl2.
Figure 1. N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms for (a) AC/NiCl2 and AC-S/NiCl2, (b) AC/ZnCl2 and AC-S/ZnCl2, (c) AC/CuCl2 and AC-S/CuCl2.
Catalysts 13 01372 g001
Figure 2. Micrographs and EDX composition for (a) AC/NiCl2, (b) AC/ZnCl2 containing zinc particles (blue arrows) on the surface and inside the pores, (c) AC/CuCl2, (d) AC-S/NiCl2 with cracks and peeling of the internal layer of the pores (red arrows), (e) AC-S/ZnCl2, and (f) AC-S/CuCl2 showing the formation of a spongy structure inside some pores (green arrows).
Figure 2. Micrographs and EDX composition for (a) AC/NiCl2, (b) AC/ZnCl2 containing zinc particles (blue arrows) on the surface and inside the pores, (c) AC/CuCl2, (d) AC-S/NiCl2 with cracks and peeling of the internal layer of the pores (red arrows), (e) AC-S/ZnCl2, and (f) AC-S/CuCl2 showing the formation of a spongy structure inside some pores (green arrows).
Catalysts 13 01372 g002
Figure 3. Thermogravimetric curves for (a) AC/NiCl2 and AC-S/NiCl2, (b) AC/ZnCl2 and AC-S/ZnCl2, (c) AC/CuCl2 and AC-S/CuCl2.
Figure 3. Thermogravimetric curves for (a) AC/NiCl2 and AC-S/NiCl2, (b) AC/ZnCl2 and AC-S/ZnCl2, (c) AC/CuCl2 and AC-S/CuCl2.
Catalysts 13 01372 g003
Figure 4. (a) XRD patterns and (b) Raman spectra for the ACs before and after sulfonation.
Figure 4. (a) XRD patterns and (b) Raman spectra for the ACs before and after sulfonation.
Catalysts 13 01372 g004
Table 1. Carbonization and sulfonation yields of the AC.
Table 1. Carbonization and sulfonation yields of the AC.
SampleYC (%) aYS (%) b
AC/NiCl228.5077.70
AC/ZnCl224.9072.20
AC/CuCl238.9053.20
a YC—carbonization yield. b YS—sulfonation yield.
Table 2. Textural properties of AC and AC-S.
Table 2. Textural properties of AC and AC-S.
SamplesSBET a
(m2 g−1)
Smicro b
(m2 g−1)
Smeso c
(m2 g−1)
Vtot d
(cm3 g−1)
Vmicro e
(cm3 g−1)
Vmeso f
(cm3 g−1)
dp g
(nm)
Smicro/SBET h (%)Vmicro/Vtot i
(%)
AC/NiCl2295.91224.7471.170.2260.1150.1113.067651
AC-S/NiCl2291.83246.3145.520.2000.1400.0602.748470
AC/ZnCl21108.84756.11352.730.6000.3980.2022.156866
AC-S/ZnCl21055.62729.97325.650.6070.4400.1672.306972
AC/CuCl2300.82264.7536.070.1850.1290.0562.468869
AC-S/CuCl2440.00383.2256.780.3180.2120.1062.898766
a SBET—specific surface area. b Smicro—t-Plot micropore area. c Smeso—t-Plot external area. d Vtot—total pore volume. e Vmicro—t-Plot micropore volume. f Vmeso = Vtot − Vmicro. g dp—average pore diameter. h Proportion of microporous surface area to total specific surface area. i Proportion of microporous volume to total volume.
Table 3. Elemental chemical composition and acidity total of the AC and AC-S.
Table 3. Elemental chemical composition and acidity total of the AC and AC-S.
Samples%C%H%N%S%O%Si *% Cl *%Ni *%Zn *%Cu *Total Acidity
mmol g−1
-SO3H
mmol g−1
AC/NiCl247.811.060.190.2129.23-0.1621.34--0.02 ± 0.001-
AC-S/NiCl252.521.940.233.6327.460.15-14.07--0.30 ± 0.0010.28 ± 0.001
AC/ZnCl265.401.020.300.1926.350.19 0.49-6.06-0.04 ± 0.002-
AC-S/ZnCl261.031.250.400.5436.290.220.27---0.09 ± 0.0020.05 ± 0.002
AC/CuCl241.400.760.230.1338.75-0.51--18.22N.D.-
AC-S/CuCl263.712.100.421.9429.220.390.44--1.780.33 ± 0.0010.33 ± 0.001
* Determination by EDX. N.D.—not detect.
Table 4. Catalytic performance of acid solids catalyst in dehydration xylose for furfural production.
Table 4. Catalytic performance of acid solids catalyst in dehydration xylose for furfural production.
SamplesC (%)Y (%)S (%)
No catalyst48.8428.7558.86
AC/NiCl275.0022.7230.79
AC-S/NiCl289.1548.6354.54
AC/ZnCl290.0010.0011.11
AC-S/ZnCl271.4331.2743.00
AC/CuCl280.0035.6744.60
AC-S/CuCl266.6755.9683.93
Table 5. Comparison of AC-S/CuCl2 with other heterogeneous acid catalysts used for furfural production.
Table 5. Comparison of AC-S/CuCl2 with other heterogeneous acid catalysts used for furfural production.
CatalystSolventT a
(°C)
T b
(min)
C c
(%)
Y d
(%)
S e
(%)
Reference
AC-S/CuCl2Water18012066.6755.9683.93This study
NbPO4Water16060 44.1017.4039.50[97]
Amberlyst 70Water160100 -18.00-[98]
l-12NbWater/Toluene160240 62.0036.6059.00[99]
Si-12NbWater/Toluene160240 42.0033.6080.00
s-MWCNTsWater170180 62.7035.8057.10[27]
AC(Zn)/SWater180120 ~20.00~10.0050.00[33]
Starbon®-SO3H Water/
Methoxycyclopentane
15075078.5054.4069.20[50]
Starbon®-SO3H Water/
Methoxycyclopentane
20075010050.3050.30
Starbon®-SO3H Water/
Methoxycyclopentane
200114010021.0021.00
Amberlyst 70Water20096071.8028.8040.11[100]
M-20Water20048052.5025.4048.40
M-20Water20096087.6044.2050.45
M-20Water/Toluene20096075.8042.6056.20
ZSM-5-30Water20048057.7019.9034.50
ZSM-5-30Water20096082.5034.1041.33
mNb-bcWater 14012041.2031.8077.10[20]
Nb2O5Water16036076.8046.1660.10[101]
Nb2O5Water/Isopropanol16036099.0034.0534.40
Nb2O5/Al2O3Water16036087.4030.6835.10
Nb2O5/Al2O3Water/Isopropanol16036091.1020.2222.20
OMC-SO3HWater200458.902.5028.08[102]
a T—temperature. b t—time. c C (%)—xylose conversion. d R (%)—yield furfural. e S (%)—selectivity.
Table 6. Preparation conditions of the ACs.
Table 6. Preparation conditions of the ACs.
Activating AgentBiomass/Activating Agent Ratio (m:m)Carbonization TemperatureNomenclature of Activated Carbon
NiCl2. 6H2O1:1550 °CAC/NiCl2
ZnCl21:1550 °CAC/ZnCl2
CuCl2. 2H2O1:1550 °CAC/CuCl2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Silva, T.A.L.; da Silva, A.C.; Pasquini, D. Synthesis and Characterization of Acid-Activated Carbon Prepared from Sugarcane Bagasse for Furfural Production in Aqueous Media. Catalysts 2023, 13, 1372. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13101372

AMA Style

Silva TAL, da Silva AC, Pasquini D. Synthesis and Characterization of Acid-Activated Carbon Prepared from Sugarcane Bagasse for Furfural Production in Aqueous Media. Catalysts. 2023; 13(10):1372. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13101372

Chicago/Turabian Style

Silva, Thiago Alves Lopes, Adilson Candido da Silva, and Daniel Pasquini. 2023. "Synthesis and Characterization of Acid-Activated Carbon Prepared from Sugarcane Bagasse for Furfural Production in Aqueous Media" Catalysts 13, no. 10: 1372. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13101372

APA Style

Silva, T. A. L., da Silva, A. C., & Pasquini, D. (2023). Synthesis and Characterization of Acid-Activated Carbon Prepared from Sugarcane Bagasse for Furfural Production in Aqueous Media. Catalysts, 13(10), 1372. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13101372

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop