Next Article in Journal
Rational Engineering of Mesorhizobium Imine Reductase for Improved Synthesis of N-Benzyl Cyclo-tertiary Amines
Previous Article in Journal
Dehydrogenation of Diethylene Glycol to Para-Dioxanone over Cu/SiO2 Catalyst: Effect of Structural and Surface Properties
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Photocatalytic Degradation of Vehicle Exhaust by Nano-TiO2 Cement Slurry: Experimental Factors and Field Application

1
School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
2
Economic and Technical Research Institute of State Grid Shandong Electric Power Company, Jinan 250021, China
3
Traffic Construction Quality and Safety Supervision Bureau of Hunan Province, Changsha 410116, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2024, 14(1), 21; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14010021
Submission received: 10 December 2023 / Revised: 23 December 2023 / Accepted: 26 December 2023 / Published: 27 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Photocatalysis)

Abstract

:
Nano-TiO2 combined with cement slurry can be utilized to degrade nitrogen oxides (NOx) in vehicle exhaust, making it an excellent photocatalytic material for air purification. In practice, environmental factors can significantly affect the photocatalytic performance. In this study, a vehicle exhaust test system was developed, and the test methods and evaluation criteria for the degradation test are provided. This study investigated the photocatalytic degradation of NO2 using nano-TiO2 cement slurry through laboratory tests. The effects of temperature, relative humidity, ultraviolet (UV) radiation flux, cement slurry thickness, surface dust adherence, and the number of water rinsing cycles were examined. Additionally, nano-TiO2 cement slurries were applied to an expressway toll station. The results showed that the efficiency of photocatalytic degradation was significantly influenced by temperature and UV radiation flux, while the thickness of the cement slurry had minimal impact. The photocatalytic degradation efficiency was negatively correlated to the relative humidity, when the relative humidity of the cement slurry specimens was high. This is because the excess water (H2O) competes with NO2 for adsorption. The photocatalytic performance of the samples was significantly reduced by surface dust and rain erosion, as both led to a decrease in the amount of nano-TiO2 participating in the reaction. Furthermore, the photocatalytic material has wide-ranging potential applications. The findings of this study would support the promotion of environmentally friendly roads as a strategy to combat air pollution.

1. Introduction

With the prevalence of industrialization and urbanization, society has entered the automobile era. In 2020, the number of cars in China exceeded 200 million [1]. In addition, vehicle exhaust emissions account more than half of total nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions in some countries [2]. Vehicle exhaust emissions can reduce lung function, thereby increasing the risk of respiratory diseases [3,4,5]. NOx emitted from vehicle exhaust is a major contributor to air pollution, posing significant hazards to human health and the environment [6,7,8,9]. Furthermore, previous studies have suggested that nitrogen dioxide (NO2) is linked to a higher occurrence of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases [10,11]. In addition to NOx, carbon monoxide (CO) is another significant contributor to air pollution, leading to the greenhouse effect and acid rain [12,13,14]. Therefore, strict management of vehicle exhaust emissions is essential to protect the environment.
The management of vehicle exhaust has become a prominent issue worldwide. Currently, most methods focus on developing new energy sources and controlling engine exhaust to reduce the content of harmful substances in emissions. Hooftman et al. [15] found that electric vehicles could have a positive impact on urban air quality, but they also noted the significance of their non-exhaust emissions. Venu et al. [16] combined nanoparticle-mixed palm biodiesel with exhaust gas recirculation, and the results showed that this new method could simultaneously reduce the emissions of harmful substances such as CO and NOx. However, due to the rapid increase in vehicle ownership, the overall volume of harmful emissions remains substantial [17].
With the rapid development and popularization of photocatalytic technology, researchers are exploring the creation of new photocatalytic road materials to degrade vehicle exhaust. The catalytic degradation of vehicle exhaust is achieved by incorporating photocatalytic materials into pavements or auxiliary facilities. Nano-TiO2 is an outstanding photocatalytic material capable of oxidizing harmful substances like CO, HC, and NOx from vehicle exhaust into environmentally friendly compounds such as CO2, H2O, and HNO3 under ultraviolet (UV) light irradiation [18,19,20,21]. Nano-TiO2 loaded on a cementitious material for purifying vehicle exhaust has been widely used [22,23,24]. In 2012 [25], a ~0.4 km photocatalytic concrete pavement was first paved in Louisiana, USA. Shen et al. [26] investigated TiO2 as a catalyst in pervious concrete to promote a more environmentally friendly urban road infrastructure. Xia et al. [27] developed a visible light-responsive and durable photocatalytic coating based on water-based acrylic emulsion for the degradation of vehicle exhaust. Witkowski et al. [28] confirmed the effectiveness of photocatalytic concrete pavements for reducing nitrogen oxide (NO) based on the results of a field study in Warsaw. Wang et al. [29] utilized the photocatalyst g-C3N4 and nano-TiO2 to modify the asphalt binder. The study findings showed that the photocatalyst had a significant ability to degrade NO.
Nano-TiO2 has broad prospects in the field of organic and inorganic pollutant degradation, and the factors affecting the degradation efficiency in its application are worth exploring. Bhattu et al. [30] analyzed the efficient removal of emerging organic pollutants from water using various nanomaterials (NMs). Their findings indicated that NMs were a highly effective and easily synthesized solution for water remediation to address emerging pollutants. Das et al. [31] demonstrated the application of nanotechnology in soil, water, food, and air pollutants. Qian et al. [32] examined the influence of NO2 concentration on the photocatalytic efficiency of TiO2-loaded cement-base materials. Luo et al. [33] developed an environmentally friendly pervious concrete with photocatalytic properties that can enhance performance under both UV and sunlight. Jin et al. [34] discovered that the inclusion of Cu, Ce, and Fe significantly improved the photocatalytic degradation rate of NO and HC gases by TiO2 pillared montmorillonite. Kuang et al. [35] investigated the optimal nano-TiO2 doping, which was found to be 8–10% of the cement mass. Jin et al. [36] investigated the impact of TiO2 pillared montmorillonite nanocomposites on the properties of matrix asphalt and their catalytic capacity for vehicle exhaust. Saber et al. [37] investigated the improvement of the photocatalytic activity of Au@TiO2/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite under UV irradiation.
However, the study of how experimental factors affect the photocatalytic performance of nano-TiO2 cement slurry is relatively incomplete. It is clear that nano-TiO2 cement slurries need to be exposed to the external environment for the photocatalytic reaction to take place. Consequently, the potential problem of rainwater washout needs to be considered for practical applications. This is particularly important for the practical application of nano-TiO2 cement slurry. Furthermore, few studies have combined indoor testing of nano-TiO2 cement slurry with field applications. Another often overlooked issue is the selection of reliable metrics to accurately represent the degradation efficiency. Currently, most of the methods used to evaluate the efficiency of photocatalytic degradation of nano-TiO2 cement slurry simply involve subtracting the initial reactant concentration from the concentration after the reaction [38,39,40]. However, these methods often overlook the adsorption of reactants by the nano-TiO2 cement slurry itself.
In this study, we fabricated the nano-TiO2 cement slurry using the ultrasonic dispersion method, developed a vehicle exhaust test system, and then determined a more accurate degradation efficiency evaluation index. Subsequently, the impact of temperature, relative humidity, UV radiation flux, cement slurry thickness, dust accumulation on the surface, and the number of water rinses on the efficiency of NO2 photocatalytic degradation by nano-TiO2 cement slurry was investigated through indoor tests. Furthermore, we applied the nano-TiO2 cement slurry at an expressway toll station and demonstrated its potential for application.

2. Mechanism of Nano-TiO2 Cement Slurry Photocatalytic Degradation of Vehicle Exhaust

Nano-TiO2 is a novel semiconductor material with a wide energy band gap and outstanding photocatalytic properties. Nano-TiO2 has two energy bands: the conduction band (CB) and valence band (VB), which depend on whether they are filled with electrons (e). The energy gap between these two bands is called the forbidden band. Nano-TiO2 exhibits photocatalytic properties when irradiated by UV light with energy greater than or equal to the forbidden bandwidth of 3.2 eV, corresponding to a wavelength of 387.5 nm or less [41,42,43]. In this case, electrons in the VB leap to the CB, forming holes (h+) in the VB and hole–electron pairs with strong redox capabilities. When electrons are released from the surface of nano-TiO2, they convert atmospheric oxygen into superoxide ions ( · O 2 ), which possess oxidizing properties, as shown in Equation (1). The superoxide ions further react to generate hydroxyl radicals (·OH) with strong oxidizing properties, as shown in Equations (2)–(4). Simultaneously, the h+ also exhibit strong oxidation, allowing them to capture the electrons in H2O and OH on the surface of the particles to produce ·OH radicals, as shown in Equations (5) and (6).
e + O 2 · O 2
· O 2 + H 2 O H O O · + O H
2 H O O · H 2 O 2 + O 2
H 2 O 2 + e · O H + O H
H 2 O + h + · O H + H +
O H + h + H 2 O
The ·O2 ions and ·OH radicals catalyze the decomposition of harmful gases, as shown in Equations (7)–(9). The NO 3 ions generated by the reaction attach to the surface of the catalyst and are carried away when exposed to water. The nano-TiO2 does not change because it is a photocatalyst. Figure 1 illustrates the mechanism of photocatalytic degradation of vehicle exhaust using nano-TiO2 [44,45].
N O + 2 · O H N O 2 + H 2 O
N O + · O 2 N O 3
N O 2 + · O H H N O 3
To expedite the development of eco-friendly roads, nano-TiO2 can be incorporated in a precise manner into the cement slurry on the surface of pavements or auxiliary facilities, thereby achieving a purifying effect on vehicle exhaust. The rough and multi-void structure of the nano-TiO2 cement slurry creates a highly concentrated vehicle exhaust field, which serves as an effective photocatalytic reaction site for nano-TiO2, as illustrated in Figure 2 [22]. There are two stages in the photocatalytic degradation of NOx in vehicle exhaust by nano-TiO2 attached to the surface of cement slurry. The first is that NOx is directly attached to the surface of nano-TiO2, where NOx is oxidatively degraded by the ·O2 and -OH generated on the surface of nano-TiO2 by UV light. The second is that, after the NOx adhered to the surface of nano-TiO2 is photocatalytically degraded, due to the rough multi-void structure of the cement slurry, the vehicle exhaust adsorbed on its surface gradually diffuses from the high-concentration region to the low-concentration region, i.e., the surface of nano-TiO2, and is then photocatalytically degraded by the concentration gradient effect. The coexistence of the two pathways greatly promotes the degradation efficiency of nano-TiO2 cement slurry on vehicle exhaust.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Effect of Temperature

Throughout the test, we activated the middle six UV lamps. Figure 3 vividly illustrates the influence of temperature on the efficiency of NO2 photocatalytic degradation by nano-TiO2 cement slurry. It can be observed that there was a maximum degradation efficiency of ~34.5% in the fitting curve, when the temperature was ~28.8 °C. Within the temperature range of 19.6–28.8 °C, the degradation efficiency increased as the temperature rose. However, as the temperature exceeded 28.8 °C, the degradation efficiency began to decline. The photocatalytic reaction is intricately linked to the diffusion and migration of reactant molecules on the catalyst surface [46,47]. During the initial heating stage, NO2 molecules actively diffused and migrated on the surface of nano-TiO2 cement slurry as the temperature rose, resulting in an increased degradation efficiency. However, when the temperature exceeded the optimal reaction temperature, excessively active NO2 molecules detached from the nano-TiO2 surface, subsequently leading to a reduction in the efficiency of NO2 photocatalytic degradation by nano-TiO2 cement slurry. Previous studies also found that there is an optimal reaction temperature for photocatalytic reactions. Above this temperature, the degradation efficiency no longer increases but gradually decreases [48,49].

3.2. Effect of Relative Humidity

The relative humidity range in the test was 64.1–81.8%, due to the highest and lowest monthly average relative humidity in the Changsha region being 82% and 64%, respectively. As depicted in Figure 4, a total of 17 nano-TiO2 cement slurry samples were immersed in water individually for 30 min. Subsequently, they were subjected to different drying times using drying equipment to attain various levels of relative humidity. The specimens were dried for durations of 0 h, 0.5 h, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 6 h, 7 h, 8 h, 9 h, 10 h, 13 h, 15 h, 18 h, 20 h, and 24 h, respectively.
The impact of relative humidity on the efficiency of NO2 photocatalytic degradation by nano-TiO2 cement slurry is shown in Figure 5. It is evident that the efficiency of NO2 degradation decreased with an increase in relative humidity within the range of 64.1–81.8%. As H2O serves as a crucial reactant in the photocatalytic reaction, an increase in its concentration should theoretically enhance photocatalytic efficiency [50]. In the current experiment, we did not observe an upward trend within the range we investigated. These results may be attributed to the following factors. During the test, humidity levels ranged from 64.1% to 81.8%, potentially exceeding the optimal humidity for the reaction. As a reactant in the photocatalytic reaction, excess H2O would compete with NO2 for adsorption at specific catalyst active sites in the nano-TiO2. This inhibited the efficiency of NO2 photocatalytic degradation by nano-TiO2 cement slurry [51,52].

3.3. Effect of UV Radiation Flux

To precisely control the UV radiation flux applied to the nano-TiO2 cement slurry, we exercised quantitative control by regulating the number of UV lamps activated in the reaction chamber. These UV lamps were sequentially numbered from 1 to 14 and positioned directly above the test specimens. The horizontal distance between the UV lamps on both sides and the edge of the specimen was maintained at 40 mm. In Figure 6, we present UV lamp 1 as an illustrative example for the calculation model of UV radiation flux. The UV lamp was activated and abstracted as a linear light source. A Cartesian coordinate system was established, with the operating plane as the xoy plane. The two endpoints of the linear light source were A0 and B0, with coordinates (x0 + l0, y0, h0) and (x0, y0, h0), respectively. M (xm, y0, h0) was a moving point on line A0B0, and P (x, y, 0) was a point on the working plane. The illumination of M to P was calculated using the irradiance calculation formula (Equation (10)):
E M P = I cos α d 2
The other parameters in Equation (10) were given as follows:
I = Φ h 0 4 π L sin 2 ( β 2 )
β = arctan ( 340 132.5 ) arctan ( 40 132.5 )
cos α = h 0 d
d = x x m 2 + y y m 2 + h 0 2
where I represents the UV lamp radiation intensity (W/sr), Φ denotes the UV light flux (W), β is the angle between the radiation light and the nearest and furthest edge of the specimen, l0 is the length of the UV lamp (m), α is the angle formed between the UV lamp radiation ray and its plumb line, h0 is the distance between the UV lamp and the specimen (m), and d is the distance between any point on the UV lamp and any point on the specimen (m).
The Equation (15) was used to determine the magnitude of UV radiation flux on the surface of the nano-TiO2 cement slurry specimen:
E = Φ h 0 2 4 π d 3 L sin 2 ( β / 2 ) d x d y
We incrementally activated two additional UV lamps at a time, starting from the center and extending towards both sides. Subsequently, we used MATLAB software to calculate the illuminance for various light configurations. Figure 7 illustrates how the efficiency of NO2 photocatalytic degradation by nano-TiO2 cement slurry is impacted by UV radiation flux. The efficiency of NO2 photocatalytic degradation by nano-TiO2 cement slurry increased as the UV radiation flux increased, ranging from 4.5 W/m2 (with 2 UV lamps turned on) to 23.8 W/m2 (with 10 UV lamps turned on). However, beyond a certain threshold, the degradation efficiency showed a declining trend. Under laboratory conditions, the optimal UV radiation flux was approximately 23.7 W/m2, resulting in a degradation efficiency of around 35.6% as indicated by the fitting curve.
As the number of activated UV lamps increased, the UV radiation flux directed at the nano-TiO2 cement slurry and the excitation energy also increased. Consequently, the electron–hole pairs generated by nano-TiO2 separated upon excitation, leading to improved photocatalytic degradation efficiency [50]. Previous studies have also shown similar effects of UV radiation flux on the degradation rate of NOx [53,54]. However, this increase in UV radiation flux resulted in a higher temperature of the reaction chamber and a decrease in humidity. When 10 UV lamps were activated, the temperature within the reaction chamber reached 31.2 °C, exceeding the optimal reaction temperature 28.8 °C. Additionally, the humidity level dropped to 59%, potentially falling below the required relative humidity. This could have diminished the generation of highly oxidative hydroxyl radicals. Thus, the efficiency of NO2 photocatalytic degradation by nano-TiO2 cement slurry decreased with an increase in UV radiation flux.

3.4. Effect of Thickness of Cement Slurry

The thickness of the cement slurry specimens was measured individually using a vernier caliper with an index value of 0.02 mm. Each specimen was measured at four specific points, located at the midpoints of its four sides. The average of these measurements was considered as the specimen’s thickness value. To determine the actual thickness of the nano-TiO2 cement slurry applied to the specimen’s surface, we used a blank specimen without cement paste and measured its thickness. The difference between the thickness of the uncoated specimen and the measured thickness of the coated specimen provided the actual thickness of the nano-TiO2 cement slurry layer applied. During the test, the six middle UV lamps were activated.
As shown in Figure 8, at different thicknesses of nano-TiO2 cement slurry (1.00 mm, 3.72 mm, 4.02 mm, 6.10 mm, and 8.80 mm), the photocatalytic degradation efficiency of NO2 by nano-TiO2 cement slurry was 42.5 ± 0.6%, 40.0 ± 0.7%, 40.5 ± 2.0%, 40.7 ± 0.8%, and 39.9 ± 0.2%, respectively. The impact of nano-TiO2 cement slurry thickness had little effect on NO2 degradation efficiency. The photocatalytic process of nano-TiO2 cement slurry mainly occurs at the gas–solid interface [22]. Increasing the thickness of the cement slurry could increase the total amount of nano-TiO2. But the limited surface voids of the cement slurry resulted in a limited number of nano-TiO2 that could come into direct contact with the NO2. And most of the nano-TiO2 was covered by the cement at the bottom of the surface layer and could not undergo the photocatalytic degradation reaction, as shown in Figure 2. Consequently, increasing the thickness of the nano-TiO2 cement slurry does not seem to be a cost-effective method for improving degradation efficiency.

3.5. Effect of Amount of Dust Adhering to the Surface

The coverage index (c) was utilized to quantify the impact of dust on the efficiency of NO2 photocatalytic degradation by nano-TiO2 cement slurry. It was calculated using Equation (18):
c = m s × 100 %
where m represents the amount of dust attached to the surface of the specimen (g), and s denotes the actual area of the specimen (m2).
An appropriate quantity of loess was crushed into fine dust and then sieved through an aperture of 0.0075 mm2. Subsequently, 5.71 g, 11.43 g, 22.86 g, 34.29 g, and 45.71 g of dust were precisely weighed using an electronic balance. The measured amounts of dust were then mixed with tap water in a mass ratio of 4:3 and thoroughly stirred. As shown in Figure 9, the dust slurry was uniformly applied to the surfaces of specimens B, C, D, E, and F, while specimen A remained blank.
As shown in Figure 10, the efficiency of NO2 photocatalytic degradation by nano-TiO2 cement slurry decreased as the coverage index increased, indicating a significant negative correlation between the two. Specifically, the degradation efficiency declined from 60.1 ± 1.8% to 40.9 ± 0.4% at a coverage index of 6.3. When the coverage index reached 50.8, the degradation efficiency plummeted to only 5.1 ± 0.2%, making its degradation capability nearly ineffective. This highlights the gas–solid nature of the photocatalytic degradation of nano-TiO2, which mainly takes place on the surface of the nano-TiO2 cement slurry and is significantly affected by the direct interaction between nano-TiO2 and NO2, as depicted in Figure 2 [22]. The presence of dust on the specimen’s surface obstructed the available surface voids and hindered direct contact between nano-TiO2 and NO2. Consequently, it significantly adversely impacted the efficiency of NO2 photocatalytic degradation by nano-TiO2 cement slurry.

3.6. Effect of Number of Water Rinsing Cycles

The maximum annual average rainfall in Changsha is approximately 1800 mL. We conducted tests by rinsing the specimen using a nozzle connected to a tap water pipe. When the water reached 1800 mL within 5 min, the valve on the water pipe was closed, and this was recorded as one rinsing cycle. Figure 11 illustrates the effect of the number of water rinsing cycles on the efficiency of NO2 photocatalytic degradation by nano-TiO2 cement slurry. Overall, the degradation efficiency decreased as the number of rinsing cycles increased. Specifically, the degradation efficiency decreased from 73.7 ± 0.7% to 54.1 ± 0.8% after two rinsing cycles (10 min). When the water rinsing cycles reached 10 (50 min), the degradation efficiency was further reduced to 49.9 ± 0.4%. This occurred because some of the nano-TiO2 was washed off the surface during the rinsing process, resulting in a decrease in degradation efficiency. In a study of the literature [55], it was found that an abrasion resistance test of nano-TiO2 cement slurry also indicated a decrease in NOx removal rate due to abrasion, similar to the result of water rinsing.
It is also worth noting that the efficiency of NO2 photocatalytic degradation by nano-TiO2 cement slurry recovered to 63.9% after three rinsing cycles (15 min). Initially, during the rinsing process, some nano-TiO2 in the specimen was encapsulated by the cement slurry and unable to effectively participate in photocatalysis. As the rinsing progressed, the nano-TiO2 concealed by the cement slurry gradually became exposed. With three rinsing cycles (15 min), the efficiency of NO2 photocatalytic degradation by nano-TiO2 cement slurry gradually improved. This observation emphasizes the importance of choosing panels with excellent adhesion to nano-TiO2 cement slurry for practical engineering applications.

4. Experimental Details

4.1. Materials and Instruments

In all tests, a commercially available nano-TiO2 powder (titanium-type, average particle size = 10 nm) was used as the photocatalyst. Nano-TiO2 cement slurry samples were prepared by mixing and stirring nano-TiO2, silicate cement (425#), sodium tripolyphosphate (ACS 99%), and tap water. Table 1 summarizes the primary instruments and their associated parameters.

4.2. Fabrication of Nano-TiO2 Cement Slurry

The mass proportion used for mixing the nano-TiO2 cement slurry sample was 1:0.5:0.08:0.0024 (cement:water:nano-TiO2:dispersant). Figure 12 illustrates the fabrication process of a nano-TiO2 cement slurry sample [33]. First, a 3% sodium tripolyphosphate solution was prepared by dissolving it in tap water to serve as the dispersant solution. Next, the measured amount of nano-TiO2 powder was added to the dispersant solution and stirred using a glass rod. The resulting mixture was then placed in an ultrasonic cleaner with a water bath for 20 min to ensure a uniform dispersion of the TiO2 nanoparticles. Subsequently, the measured amount of cement was added to the dispersed nano-TiO2 solution and stirred in the cement slurry mixer for 5 min. The well-stirred slurry was applied to a panel with dimensions of 300 × 300 × 8 mm and cured under standard conditions for 28 days.

4.3. Degradation of Vehicle Exhaust Test

We independently developed a system for conducting vehicle exhaust degradation tests, as depicted in Figure 13. A reaction chamber with dimensions of 500 × 500 × 400 mm was constructed using 10 mm thick organic glass. To facilitate the photocatalytic degradation of vehicle exhaust in the cement slurry, fourteen identical UV lamps were used as energy sources for photocatalytic excitation. Each lamp had a spectrum, power, and length of 365 nm, 15 W, and 30 cm, respectively. The UV lamps were securely mounted on a steel frame, maintaining a distance of over 1 cm between the steel frame and the top plate of the reaction chamber to minimize the impact of the heat generated by the UV lamps on the temperature inside the chamber. To prevent the accumulation of exhaust fumes, a fan was attached to a foam board holding the test sample.
When conducting the experiment, the well-cured samples were initially placed inside the exhaust reaction chamber. Subsequently, pre-collected automotive exhaust was introduced into the reaction chamber, and the UV light source was activated to initiate the photocatalytic reaction. The total reaction time was 120 min, and data readings were taken every 20 min. During the vehicle exhaust test, temperature and humidity levels were controlled using an air heater and a temperature and humidity controller. Changes in vehicle exhaust concentration were monitored using a vehicle exhaust analyzer and a nitrogen dioxide detector connected to the reaction chamber.

4.4. Degradation Efficiency Evaluation Index

The effectiveness of the photocatalytic cement slurry in degrading vehicle exhaust was assessed by measuring the reduction of vehicle exhaust concentration in the reaction chamber. The degradation efficiency for NOx, denoted as ω0, was used as the evaluation index and calculated using Equation (17) [38,39,40]:
ω 0 = ( C 0 C 1 ) C 0 × 100 %
where C0 and C1 are the concentrations of NOx at the beginning and end of the reaction, respectively (ppm).
During the test, it was observed that some of the NO reacted with oxygen to produce NO2, and a portion of the NO2 in the vehicle exhaust test system was adsorbed onto the cement slurry surface. Consequently, we conducted a calibration test to determine the natural degradation efficiency of vehicle exhaust. Pure cement slurry without nano-TiO2 was exposed to various initial concentrations of NO2, and then the middle six UV lamps were turned on. Figure 14 illustrates the impact of initial concentrations on the removal ratio of NO2. When the initial concentration of NO2 in vehicle exhaust was 660 ppm or less, there was a positive correlation between its initial concentration and the removal ratio, with a correlation coefficient of 0.999. However, when the initial concentration of NO2 exceeded 660 ppm, the removal ratio of NO2 did not increase and remained constant at 54.78%. The rough, multi-void structure of cement slurry allows its surface to absorb some of the NO2 gas. As the NO2 concentration increased, more NO2 was adsorbed, but the total amount of NO2 adsorbed by the cement slurry remained constant. When the surface adsorption site was fully occupied, the removal ratio of NO2 was not increased, but maintained at a stable level.
Considering the variation in NO2 concentration within the reaction space of the vehicle exhaust test system, the calibrated degradation efficiency ω1 (Equation (18)) was used as the evaluation index for assessing the efficiency of NO2 photocatalytic degradation by nano-TiO2 cement slurry in the following evaluations:
ω 1 = a × ( 1 b ) c a × ( 1 b ) × 100 %
where a is the initial concentration of NO2 (ppm) and b is the natural removal ratio of NO2 concentration (ppm). If the initial concentration of NO2 is more than 660 ppm, b = 54.78%; otherwise, b = 0.083 × a; c is the concentration of NO2 remaining after the reaction (ppm).

5. Field Application of Nano-TiO2 Cement Slurry

Nano-TiO2 cement slurry is used to degrade harmful components, such as NO2 in vehicle exhaust. Most current assessments of the performance of nano-TiO2 cement slurry photocatalytic materials in degrading vehicle exhaust use on-site instruments to measure changes in nitrogen oxide concentration [56]. However, the concentration of NO2 in the field is influenced by natural environmental factors such as temperature, humidity, and wind speed. As a result, the test results may not accurately reflect the photocatalytic effectiveness of nano-TiO2 materials. In this section, we introduce an evaluation method based on photocatalytic products to assess the performance of nano-TiO2 cement slurry in the degradation of vehicle exhaust.

5.1. Field Application of Nano-TiO2 Cement Slurry

Test specimens (dimensions: 300 × 300 × 8 mm) coated with nano-TiO2 cement slurry were prepared following the processing method presented in Figure 12. The cured test pieces were placed near the exit of an expressway toll station in Changsha for 8 days. Weather statistics for the period are presented in Table 2, and an on-site photo is shown in Figure 15. After 8 days, the test pieces were retrieved and rinsed with tap water using a sprayer, and the water used for rinsing was collected in a measuring cylinder. The concentration of NO 3 in the rinsing solution was determined using UV spectrophotometry [57].

5.2. Determination of Optimal Rinsing Water Consumption

Prior to the test, it was necessary to determine the amount of water needed to rinse the specimen. Insufficient water would result in NO3 residues on the specimen’s surface, hindering complete removal. Conversely, excessive water consumption would lead to a low concentration of NO 3 in the rinsing solution. The vehicle exhaust test system was set up to simulate the field environment. After 120 min, the test pieces were removed, washed with tap water, and the rinsing solution was collected. The concentration of NO3 was determined using UV spectrophotometry. The relationship between NO 3 concentration and rinsing water consumption is shown in Figure 16. It was observed that, when the water consumption for rinsing the test panel was 25 mL, the NO3 concentration in the resulting rinsing solution reached its peak at 6.48 mg/L.

5.3. Evaluation of the Performance of Nano-TiO2 Cement Slurry for Field Application

The specimens placed in the field were retrieved and rinsed by spraying them with tap water. A measuring cylinder was used to collect the rinsing solution, and the rinsing was stopped when the collected solution reached 25 mL. The average concentration of NO3 in the rinsing solution was 10.85 mg/L as determined by UV spectrophotometry. The NO 3 content in the rinsing solution was 0.27125 mg, calculated by multiplying the concentration of NO3 by the volume of the collected 25 mL rinsing water. It was further calculated that the amount of NO2 degraded in vehicle exhaust by the nano-TiO2 sample was 0.20125 mg. By dividing the panel placement time and area, the NO2 photocatalytic degradation efficiency by the nano-TiO2 specimen was approximately 0.28 mg/m2/day.

6. Conclusions

The aim of this study was to examine the impact of various environmental factors on the efficiency of NO2 photocatalytic degradation by nano-TiO2 cement slurry, and to assess its practical applicability. The nano-TiO2 cement slurry was prepared using the ultrasonic dispersion method. Subsequently, a vehicle exhaust test system was established, and a new index for evaluating degradation efficiency was determined to investigate the experimental variables. Finally, the effectiveness of using nano-TiO2 cement slurry for the photocatalytic degradation of vehicle exhaust was assessed at an expressway toll station. Based on the results, the following conclusions can be drawn:
(1)
The efficiency of NO2 photocatalytic degradation by nano-TiO2 cement slurry was significantly affected by temperature and UV illumination. There was an optimal temperature (28.8 °C in this test) at which the degradation efficiency was maximized. As the temperature increased, the degradation efficiency initially increased and then declined.
(2)
Excessive water molecules and dust on the cement surface will compete with NO2 for adsorption on nano-TiO2, thereby occupying specific active sites of the catalyst. Consequently, an increase in relative humidity (falling within the range of 64.1% to 81.8%) results in a reduced degradation efficiency of nano-TiO2 cement slurry for NO2.
(3)
The thickness of the nano-TiO2 cement slurry had only a minor impact on the efficiency of NO2 photocatalytic degradation by nano-TiO2 cement slurry. The photocatalytic properties of the samples were significantly diminished by surface dust and rain erosion.
(4)
The evaluation method based on photocatalytic products for assessing the photocatalytic performance of nano-TiO2 cement slurry in degrading vehicle exhaust is less affected by natural environmental factors. Field application has shown that the nano-TiO2 cement paste exhibits good performance in the photocatalytic degradation of vehicle exhaust. The efficiency of NO2 photocatalytic degradation by nano-TiO2 cement slurry was approximately 0.28 mg/m2/day.
In field applications, the current cost of laying nano-TiO2 cement slurry is relatively high. However, with the advancement of nano-TiO2 preparation technology and market development, the cost is expected to be significantly reduced. At the same time, the bonding of nano-TiO2 cement slurry to road accessory materials is an important factor affecting the large-scale application of nano-TiO2 cement slurry. How to make nano-TiO2 cement slurry effectively bonded with road accessory materials is an important research direction for the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Funding acquisition, Writing—review and editing, Y.K.; Formal analysis, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing—original draft, F.D.; Investigation, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing, Z.P.; Writing—original draft, F.F.; Data curation, Z.Z.; Funding acquisition, X.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52378210 and 51878663), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (Grant No. 2023JJ30674), and Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities of Central South University (Grant No. 2023ZZTS0408).

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (Z.P.) upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

Zhaohuan Zhang is employed in the Economic and Technical Research Institute of State Grid Shandong Electric Power Company. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, T.; Jin, T.; Qi, J.; Liu, S.; Hu, J.; Wang, Z.; Li, Z.; Mao, H.; Xu, X. Influence of test cycle and fuel property on fuel consumption and exhaust emissions of a heavy-duty diesel engine. Energy 2022, 244, 122705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Marques, B.; Kostenidou, E.; Valiente, A.M.; Vansevenant, B.; Sarica, T.; Fine, L.; Temime-Roussel, B.; Tassel, P.; Perret, P.; Liu, Y.; et al. Detailed Speciation of Non-Methane Volatile Organic Compounds in Exhaust Emissions from Diesel and Gasoline Euro 5 Vehicles Using Online and Offline Measurements. Toxics 2022, 10, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhang, Z.; Liu, K.; Chong, D.; Niu, D.; Lin, P.; Liu, X.; Niu, Y.; Jing, R. Evaluation of photocatalytic micro-surfacing mixture: Road performance, vehicle exhaust gas degradation capacity and environmental impacts. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 345, 128367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhu, Y.; Pan, Z.; Jing, D.; Liang, H.; Cheng, J.; Li, D.; Zhou, X.; Lin, F.; Liu, H.; Pan, P.; et al. Association of air pollution, genetic risk, and lifestyle with incident adult-onset asthma: A prospective cohort study. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 257, 114922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bronte, O.; García-García, F.; Lee, D.-J.; Urrutia, I.; Uranga, A.; Nieves, M.; Martínez-Minaya, J.; Quintana, J.M.; Arostegui, I.; Zalacain, R.; et al. Impact of outdoor air pollution on severity and mortality in COVID-19 pneumonia. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 894, 164877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tyukavkina, V.V.; Shchelokova, E.A.; Tsyryatyeva, A.V.; Kasikov, A.G. TiO2–SiO2 nanocomposites from technological wastes for self-cleaning cement composition. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 44, 102648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bej, D.; Chattaraj, N. Air pollution from vehicle-tailpipe emissions and diagnostic approaches through cyber–physical platform—A review. Microprocess. Microsyst. 2023, 98, 104805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pérez-Nicolás, M.; Navarro-Blasco, I.; Fernández, J.M.; Alvarez, J.I. Atmospheric NOx removal: Study of cement mortars with iron- and vanadium-doped TiO2 as visible light–sensitive photocatalysts. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 149, 257–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Huang, M.; Huang, Y.; Cao, J.; Tao, W. Study on mitigation of automobile exhaust pollution in an urban street canyon: Emission reduction and air cleaning street lamps. Build. Environ. 2021, 193, 107651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Paul, L.A.; Burnett, R.T.; Kwong, J.C.; Hystad, P.; Donkelaar, A.; Bai, L.; Goldberg, M.S.; Lavigne, E.; Copes, R.; Martin, R.V.; et al. The impact of air pollution on the incidence of diabetes and survival among prevalent diabetes cases. Environ. Int. 2020, 134, 105333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tamayo, T.; Rathmann, W.; Stahl-Pehe, A.; Landwehr, S.; Sugiri, D.; Krämer, U.; Hermann, J.; Holl, R.; Rosenbauer, J. No adverse effect of outdoor air pollution on HbA1c in children and young adults with type 1 diabetes. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2016, 219, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Li, X.; Zhang, L.; Li, L.; Hu, Y.; Liu, J.; Xu, Y.; Luo, C.; Zheng, C. NO removal from flue gas using conventional imidazolium-based ionic liquids at high pressures. Energy Fuels 2018, 32, 6039–6048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Huang, R.-J.; Zhang, Y.; Bozzetti, C.; Ho, K.-F.; Cao, J.-J.; Han, Y.; Daellenbach, K.R.; Slowik, J.G.; Platt, S.M.; Canonaco, F.; et al. High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events in China. Nature 2014, 514, 218–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mochida, I.; Korai, Y.; Shirahama, M.; Kawano, S.; Hada, T.; Seo, Y.; Yoshikawa, M.; Yasutake, A. Removal of SOx and NOx over activated carbon fibers. Carbon 2000, 38, 227–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hooftman, N.; Messagie, M.; Joint, F.; Segard, J.-B.; Coosemans, T. In-life range modularity for electric vehicles: The environmental impact of a range-extender trailer system. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Venu, H.; Subramani, L.; Dhana, R.V. Emission reduction in a DI diesel engine using exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) of palm biodiesel blended with TiO2 nano additives. Renew. Energy 2019, 140, 245–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, R.; Wu, J.; Liu, H.; Gao, Z.; Sun, H.; Ding, R.; Tang, T. Crowded urban traffic: Co-evolution among land development, population, roads and vehicle ownership. Nonlinear Dyn. 2019, 95, 2783–2795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lapidus, A.; Korolev, E.; Topchiy, D.; Kuzmina, T.; Shekhovtsova, S.; Shestakov, N. Self-cleaning cement-based building materials. Buildings 2022, 12, 606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, Z.; Tan, J.; Cheng, L.; Yang, W. Carbon nano-layer coated TiO2 nanoparticles for efficient photocatalytic CO2 reduction into CH4 and CO. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 34106–34114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Qian, G.; Yu, H.; Gong, X.; Zhao, L. Impact of Nano-TiO2 on the NO2 degradation and rheological performance of asphalt pavement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 218, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, R.; Xiao, F.; Amirkhanian, S.; You, Z.; Huang, J. Developments of nano materials and technologies on asphalt materials—A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 143, 633–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jia, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Shi, J. Adsorption kinetics of the photocatalytic reaction of nano-TiO2 cement-based materials: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 370, 130462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nada, A.A.; El Rouby, W.M.A.; Bekheet, M.F.; Antuch, M.; Weber, M.; Miele, P.; Viter, R.; Roualdes, S.; Millet, P.; Bechelany, M. Highly textured boron/nitrogen co-doped TiO2 with honeycomb structure showing enhanced visible-light photoelectrocatalytic activity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 505, 144419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Guo, M.; Poon, C. Photocatalytic NO removal of concrete surface layers intermixed with TiO2. Build. Environ. 2013, 70, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dylla, H.; Hassan, M.M.; Osborn, D. Field evaluation of photocatalytic concrete pavements’ ability to remove nitrogen oxides. Trans. Res. Rec. 2012, 2290, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shen, S.; Burtou, M.; Jobson, B.; Haselbach, L. Pervious concrete with titanium dioxide as a photocatalyst compound for a greener urban road environment. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 35, 874–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xia, H.; Liu, G.; Zhang, R.; Song, L.; Chen, H. The Photocatalytic Degradation of Vehicle Exhausts by an Fe/N/Co–TiO2 Waterborne Coating under Visible Light. Materials 2019, 12, 3378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Witkowski, H.; Jarosławski, J.; Tryfon-Bojarska, A. Application of Photocatalytic Concrete Paving Blocks in Poland—Verification of Effectiveness of Nitric Oxides Reduction and Novel Test Method. Materials 2020, 13, 5183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Niu, D.; Niu, Y.; Xia, H.; Wang, Y. Effect of Photocatalyst on Rheological Behavior and NO Degradation Capacity of Asphalt Binder. Catalysts 2023, 13, 1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bhattu, M.; Singh, J. Recent advances in nanomaterials based sustainable approaches for mitigation of emerging organic pollutants. Chemosphere 2023, 321, 138072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Das, S.; Mukherjee, A. Chapter 1—Nanotechnology as sustainable strategy for remediation of soil contaminants, air pollutants, and mitigation of food biodeterioration. In Environmental Applications of Microbial Nanotechnology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Qian, C.; Zhao, L.; Wang, R. Effect of concentration of nitrogen oxidizes on photocatalytic oxidation efficiency of nano-TiO2 photocatalyst immobilized on cement-based material. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2007, 15, 582–585. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  33. Luo, G.; Liu, H.; Li, W.; Lyu, X. Automobile Exhaust Removal Performance of Pervious Concrete with Nano TiO2 under Photocatalysis. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Jin, J.; Chen, B.; Liu, L.; Liu, R.; Qian, G.; Wei, H.; Zheng, J. A Study on Modified Bitumen with Metal Doped Nano-TiO2 Pillared Montmorillonite. Materials 2019, 12, 1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kuang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Ji, X.; Zhang, X. Study on nano-TiO2 photocatalytic cement paste with of automobile exhaust degradation performance. J. Funct. Mater. 2017, 48, 2241–2246. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jin, J.; Xiao, T.; Tan, Y.; Zheng, J.; Liu, R.; Qian, G.; Wei, H.; Zhang, J. Effects of TiO2 pillared montmorillonite nanocomposites on the properties of asphalt with exhaust catalytic capacity. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 205, 339–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Saber, N.B.; Mezni, A.; Alrooqi, A.; Altalhi, T. Fabrication of efficient Au@TiO2/rGO heterojunction nanocomposite: Boosted photocatalytic activity under ultraviolet and visible light irradiation. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 12, 2238–2246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Guo, M.; Chen, J.; Xia, M.; Wang, T.; Poon, C. Pathways of conversion of nitrogen oxides by nano TiO2 incorporated in cement-based materials. Build. Environ. 2018, 144, 412–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, S.; Shi, Z. Study on catalytic decomposition of vehicle exhaust pavement materials by TiO2. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, C.; Tang, B.; Cao, X.; Gu, F.; Huang, W. Enhanced photocatalytic decomposition of NO on portland cement concrete pavement using nano-TiO2 suspension. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 275, 122135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xie, J.; Kuang, Y. Photocatalytic technology of nano-TiO2 and its application in photodegradation of automobile exhaust. Mater. Rep. 2012, 26, 141–145. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, X.; Wang, F.; You, L.; Wu, S.; Yang, C.; Zhang, L.; Barbieri, D.M. A review on photocatalytic asphalt pavement designed for degradation of vehicle exhausts. Transp. Res. D Transp. Environ. 2023, 115, 103605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Fan, W.; Chan, K.; Zhang, C.; Leung, M.K.H. Advanced solar photocatalytic asphalt for removal of vehicular NOx. Energy Procedia 2017, 143, 811–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, L.; Lu, Q.; Shan, R.; Zhang, F.; Muhammad, Y.; Huang, K. Photocatalytic degradation of vehicular exhaust by nitrogen-doped titanium dioxide modified pavement material. Transp. Res. D Transp. Environ. 2021, 91, 102690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ballari, M.M.; Yu, Q.L.; Brouwers, H.J.H. Experimental study of the NO and NO2 degradation by photocatalytically active concrete. Catal. Today 2011, 161, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lin, Y.T.; Weng, C.H.; Chen, F.Y. Key operating parameters affecting photocatalytic activity of visible-light-induced C-doped TiO2 catalyst for ethylene oxidation. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 248, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Xiao, L.; Chen, P.; Yang, W.; Zhao, X.; Dong, F. Photocatalytic reaction mechanisms at the gas–solid interface for environmental and energy applications. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2021, 11, 7807–7839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hager, S.; Bauer, R.; Kudielka, G. Photocatalytic oxidation of gaseous chlorinated organics over titanium dioxide. Chemosphere 2000, 41, 1219–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sánchez, B.; Cardona, A.I.; Romero, M.; Avila, P.; Bahamonde, A. Influence of temperature on gas-phase photo-assisted mineralization of TCE using tubular and monolit. Catal. Today 1999, 54, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Qian, C.; Zhao, L.; Fu, D.; Li, L.; Wang, R. Study on the effect of temperature, humidity and light intensity on photocatalytic oxidation of NO2 by Nano-TiO2 immobilized on cement-based materials. Acta Sci. Circumstantiae 2005, 25, 623–630. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pellegrino, F.; Zangirolami, M.; Minero, C.; Maurino, V. Portable photoreactor for on-site measurement of the activity of photocatalytic surfaces. Catal. Today 2020, 340, 363–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Casagrande, C.A.; Repette, W.L.; Hotza, D. Effect of environmental conditions on degradation of NOx gases by photocatalytic nanotitania-based cement mortars after long-term hydration. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 274, 123067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Puddu, V.; Choi, H.; Dionysiou, D.D.; Li Puma, G. TiO2 photocatalyst for indoor air remediation: Influence of crystallinity, crystal phase, and UV radiation intensity on trichloroethylene degradation. Appl. Catal. B 2010, 94, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wang, K.H.; Tsai, H.H.; Hsieh, Y.H. A study of photocatalytic degradation of trichloroethylene in vapor phase on TiO2 photocatalyst. Chemosphere 1998, 36, 2763–2773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Guo, M.Z.; Ling, T.C.; Poon, C.S. Photocatalytic NOx degradation of concrete surface layers intermixed and spray-coated with nano-TiO2: Influence of experimental factors. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2017, 83, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Folli, A.; Strøm, M.; Madsen, T.P.; Henriksen, T.; Lang, J.; Emenius, J.; Klevebrant, T.; Nilsson, A. Field study of air purifying paving elements containing TiO2. Atmos. Environ. 2015, 107, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. GB/T 5750.5-2023; Standard Examination Methods for Drinking Water—Part 5: Inorganic Nonmetallic Indices. Standards Press of China: Beijing, China, 2023. (In Chinese)
Figure 1. Mechanism of nano-TiO2 photocatalytic degradation of vehicle exhaust.
Figure 1. Mechanism of nano-TiO2 photocatalytic degradation of vehicle exhaust.
Catalysts 14 00021 g001
Figure 2. The photocatalytic reaction on the surface of nano-TiO2 cement slurry.
Figure 2. The photocatalytic reaction on the surface of nano-TiO2 cement slurry.
Catalysts 14 00021 g002
Figure 3. NO2 degradation efficiency versus temperature.
Figure 3. NO2 degradation efficiency versus temperature.
Catalysts 14 00021 g003
Figure 4. (a) Immersed cement slurry sample; (b) drying equipment.
Figure 4. (a) Immersed cement slurry sample; (b) drying equipment.
Catalysts 14 00021 g004
Figure 5. NO2 degradation efficiency versus relative humidity.
Figure 5. NO2 degradation efficiency versus relative humidity.
Catalysts 14 00021 g005
Figure 6. UV lamp radiation flux calculation model (Units: mm).
Figure 6. UV lamp radiation flux calculation model (Units: mm).
Catalysts 14 00021 g006
Figure 7. NO2 degradation efficiency versus UV radiation flux.
Figure 7. NO2 degradation efficiency versus UV radiation flux.
Catalysts 14 00021 g007
Figure 8. NO2 degradation efficiency versus the thickness of cement slurry.
Figure 8. NO2 degradation efficiency versus the thickness of cement slurry.
Catalysts 14 00021 g008
Figure 9. Specimens after dust adhesion: (a) specimen A; (b) specimen B; (c) specimen C; (d) specimen D; (e) specimen E; (f) specimen F.
Figure 9. Specimens after dust adhesion: (a) specimen A; (b) specimen B; (c) specimen C; (d) specimen D; (e) specimen E; (f) specimen F.
Catalysts 14 00021 g009
Figure 10. NO2 degradation efficiency versus coverage index.
Figure 10. NO2 degradation efficiency versus coverage index.
Catalysts 14 00021 g010
Figure 11. NO2 degradation efficiency versus water rinsing cycles.
Figure 11. NO2 degradation efficiency versus water rinsing cycles.
Catalysts 14 00021 g011
Figure 12. Fabrication process of nano-TiO2 cement slurry sample.
Figure 12. Fabrication process of nano-TiO2 cement slurry sample.
Catalysts 14 00021 g012
Figure 13. Vehicle exhaust test system: (a) schematic diagram; (b) site photo.
Figure 13. Vehicle exhaust test system: (a) schematic diagram; (b) site photo.
Catalysts 14 00021 g013
Figure 14. Relationship between the initial concentration and natural removal ratio of NO2.
Figure 14. Relationship between the initial concentration and natural removal ratio of NO2.
Catalysts 14 00021 g014
Figure 15. Nano-TiO2 cement slurry sample application field photo.
Figure 15. Nano-TiO2 cement slurry sample application field photo.
Catalysts 14 00021 g015
Figure 16. NO 3 concentration versus rinse water consumption.
Figure 16. NO 3 concentration versus rinse water consumption.
Catalysts 14 00021 g016
Table 1. Test instruments.
Table 1. Test instruments.
ItemPhotographObjectRangePrecision
FGA-4100 auto exhaust gas analyzerCatalysts 14 00021 i001NO0–5000 ppm1 ppm
HD-P900 nitrogen dioxide detectorCatalysts 14 00021 i002NO20–500 ppm0.01 ppm
Saipwell HG040-45W air heaterCatalysts 14 00021 i003temperature−45–80 °C0.1 °C
CSTH80 intelligent digital temperature and humidity controllerCatalysts 14 00021 i004temperature and humidity−19.9–99.9 °C
0.0–99.9% RH
0.1 °C
0.1% RH
Table 2. Weather statistics.
Table 2. Weather statistics.
Test DaysWeatherTemperature (°C)Relative Humidity (%)
Day 1sunny to cloudy3–1563
Day 2cloudy6–1070
Day 3sunny to cloudy5–1264
Day 4cloudy5–1359
Day 5cloudy8–1254
Day 6sunny4–1566
Day 7sunny6–1552
Day 8sunny to cloudy6–1747
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kuang, Y.; Ding, F.; Peng, Z.; Fan, F.; Zhang, Z.; Ji, X. Photocatalytic Degradation of Vehicle Exhaust by Nano-TiO2 Cement Slurry: Experimental Factors and Field Application. Catalysts 2024, 14, 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14010021

AMA Style

Kuang Y, Ding F, Peng Z, Fan F, Zhang Z, Ji X. Photocatalytic Degradation of Vehicle Exhaust by Nano-TiO2 Cement Slurry: Experimental Factors and Field Application. Catalysts. 2024; 14(1):21. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14010021

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kuang, Yachuan, Fuzheng Ding, Zhiwei Peng, Fan Fan, Zhaohuan Zhang, and Xiaoyong Ji. 2024. "Photocatalytic Degradation of Vehicle Exhaust by Nano-TiO2 Cement Slurry: Experimental Factors and Field Application" Catalysts 14, no. 1: 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14010021

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop