Next Article in Journal
Deactivation and Regeneration Studies of Molybdenum-Based Catalysts in the Oxidative Desulfurization of Marine Fuel Oil
Previous Article in Journal
Demonstrating Effectual Catalysis of Corncob with Solid Acid Sn-NUS-BH in Cyclopentyl Methyl Ether–Water for Co-Producing Reducing Sugar, Furfural, and Xylooligosaccharides
Previous Article in Special Issue
Seeding as a Decisive Tool for Increasing Space-Time-Yields in the Preparation of High-Quality Cu/ZnO/ZrO2 Catalysts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Coupling Carbon Dioxide and Cyclohexane Oxide Using Metal-Free Catalyst with Tunable Selectivity of Product Under Mild Conditions

Zhejiang Shenyao Petrochemical Technology Co., Ltd., Jiangshan Road 1, Jiangde, Hangzhou 311604, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2024, 14(11), 822; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14110822
Submission received: 20 August 2024 / Revised: 1 November 2024 / Accepted: 11 November 2024 / Published: 14 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Catalysis for CO2 Conversion, 2nd Edition)

Abstract

:
This study introduces a metal-free binary catalytic system for coupling CO2 with cyclohexane oxide (CHO) under mild conditions, allowing for tunable product selectivity. Using trans-cyclohexane diol (trans-CHD) and phosphazene superbase (P4) as catalysts, the system selectively produces cyclic carbonates and oligocarbonates at 1 bar CO2 pressure and 80 °C. By adjusting the catalyst ratio, varying proportions of cis-cyclohexane carbonate (cis-CHC), trans-cyclohexane carbonate (trans-CHC), and oligocarbonate are achieved, with 51 mol% CHO conversion and respective selectivities of 36%, 31%, and 33%. The catalytic efficiency and precise control of product outcomes underscore this system’s potential.

1. Introduction

Rising concerns over CO2 levels have driven the development of advanced technologies to convert CO2 into valuable products [1,2]. Beyond physical uses like supercritical fluid extraction and foaming, chemical transformation of CO2 offers a non-toxic, abundant alternative to hazardous phosgene [3,4]. However, due to CO2’s fully oxidized and symmetric structure, effective catalytic methods are required for its activation. Coupling CO2 with epoxides (EPs) using metal or organic catalysts is promising, producing polycarbonates and cyclic compounds. The high ring strain of 3-membered EPs [5] enables reactions with CO2 through copolymerization [6,7] or cycloaddition under mild conditions.
While metal-based catalysts are known for their high efficiency [8,9,10], the growing interest in metal-free catalytic systems offers an alternative for CO2 incorporation into fine chemicals [11,12,13]. Examples include organo Lewis acids (e.g., borane) and ionic liquids [14,15]. Since the pioneering use of tetrabutylammonium bromide (TBABr) to convert CO2 into cyclic carbonates under high temperatures and pressures [16], efforts have focused on milder conditions. For example, Zhang et al. achieved styrene carbonate synthesis with an ionic liquid catalyst at 1 bar CO2 and 120 °C [17], and triazole derivatives enabled CO2 and epoxide cycloaddition at ambient conditions [18].
Incorporating CO2 into polymer main chains offers an alternative approach for utilizing this green carbon resource [19,20,21,22]. A typical metal-free catalytic system is derived from borane, with its six valence electrons enabling the acceptance of lone pairs of electrons, which activates the oxygen atom of epoxide. The first example of organocatalyzed CO2 and epoxide copolymerization was reported using tri-methylene borane, resulting in high-molecular-weight polycarbonate [23]. Significant advancements in Lewis acid catalyst design have accelerated the generation of polycarbonate from CO2 and epoxide [24,25]; however, the development of Lewis base catalysts for CO2 and epoxide copolymerization remains unachieved. This may be because the rate of “back-biting” (a side reaction in copolymerization where cyclic carbonate can be formed) is much faster than the propagation of the polymer chain when using a Lewis base catalyst.
In this study, we report a metal-free binary catalyst derived from a Lewis base, capable of producing either polycarbonate (such as oligocarbonate) or cyclic carbonate by adjusting the catalyst ratio at ambient CO2 pressure (Scheme 1). This system combines trans-cyclohexane diol (trans-CHD) and a phosphazene super base (1-tert-Butyl-4,4,4-tris(dimethylamino)-2,2-bis[tris(dimethylamino)-phosphoranylidenamino]-2λ5,4λ5-catenadi(phosphazene), P4) to selectively couple CO2 and cyclohexane oxide, yielding the desired cyclic carbonate or polycarbonate with high catalytic efficiency.

2. Results and Discussion

The coupling of CO2 and cyclohexane oxide (CHO) was first attempted using a 1:1 ratio of trans-CHD and P4 at ambient CO2 pressure (1 bar) and 80 °C for 24 h. The conversion of CHO and the selectivity of the resulting products were analyzed by 1H NMR spectroscopy. With 5 mol% catalyst loading, CHO was successfully coupled with CO2 to yield multiple products, achieving a CHO conversion of 53 mol% (Table 1, entry 1). 1H NMR analysis revealed 18 mol% trans-cyclohexane carbonate (trans-CHC), 33 mol% cis-cyclohexane carbonate, and 56 mol% poly(carbonate-co-ether) (Figure 1).
To investigate the cooperative effect of trans-CHD and P4, a control experiment was conducted using either trans-CHD or P4 individually. No product formation was detected by 1H NMR, confirming the synergistic effect of the binary catalyst. We propose that the alkoxide, generated from the deprotonation of diol by P4, serves as the active center for coupling CO2 and CHO. The resulting mixture was analyzed by size-exclusion chromatography, revealing the formation of an oligomer with an average molecular weight (Mn) of 600 g/mol and a molecular weight dispersity (Đ) of 1.45 (Figure 2). This finding demonstrates that the combination of trans-CHD and P4 effectively promotes the coupling of CO2 and CHO under mild conditions.
To further enhance the coupling reaction, experiments were conducted under varying conditions. With an increase in temperature, the overall conversion of CHO gradually rose (from 5 mol% to 80 mol%). At a higher temperature (105 °C), the reaction exhibited high selectivity for cis-CHC (90 mol%) with a minor presence of trans isomers. In contrast, reactions at lower temperatures (45–65 °C) demonstrated relatively higher selectivity for trans-CHC and ether linkages. This may be because trans-CHC, formed from the coupling of CO2 and CHO, is favored at lower temperatures and can undergo ring-opening to produce either oligocarbonate or cis-CHC. The ether linkage may result from either decarboxylation or copolymerization with trans-CHC.
Since oligocarbonate selectivity is highest at 85 °C with minimal ether side products, the time-dependent effect on copolymerization was examined under identical conditions (5 mol% catalyst loading, 1:1 ratio, and 1 bar CO2). Extending the reaction time to 72 h gradually increased the overall CHO conversion (Figure 3a). After 48 h, SEC characterization revealed oligocarbonate with an Mn of 450 g/mol and Đ = 1.30, slightly lower than the Mn of 600 g/mol and Đ = 1.45 observed at 24 h. An aliquot of the mixture was analyzed by 1H NMR spectroscopy to track product evolution. Selectivity for trans-CHC gradually decreased, while cis-CHC selectivity correspondingly increased from 30 to 50 mol%, with an overall CHO conversion of 80 mol% (Figure 3b). Extending the reaction time did not significantly affect the selectivity of ether and carbonate linkages but increased the yield of cis-CHC, suggesting that oligocarbonate selectivity is primarily governed by temperature.
Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was used to characterize the reaction mixture. An identical volume of aliquot was withdrawn from the mixture for quantitative measurement. The absorption peaks of the ether linkage were observed around 1200 cm−1, while the ether derived from CHO appeared at 1250 cm−1 (Figure 4, left). The region between 1700 cm−1 and 1900 cm−1 corresponds to carbonyl absorption, where oligocarbonate, trans-CHC, and cis-CHC can be distinctly identified. The peak at 1737 cm−1 is attributed to the carbonyl group in the oligocarbonate linkage, while the peaks at 1801 and 1820 cm−1 correspond to the carbonyl groups of the cis and trans isomers, respectively (Figure 4, right). Over time, the ratio between trans and cis forms gradually decreases, supporting the conclusions drawn from 1H NMR analysis.
Extending the reaction time did not significantly increase the Mn of oligocarbonate but did enhance cyclic product formation. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the impact of the catalyst ratio on the coupling reaction. To investigate the effect of catalyst loading, various amounts of binary catalyst relative to CHO were applied under identical conditions (1 bar CO2, 85 °C, for 24 h). Increasing the catalyst loading to 10 mol% resulted in a higher CHO conversion (80 mol%). Notably, product selectivity differed from the reaction with 5 mol%, showing a higher selectivity for cis-CHC (62 mol%) compared to trans-CHC (10 mol%) and oligocarbonate (28 mol%). This suggests that the generation rate of cis-CHC is relatively faster than that of the trans isomer and oligocarbonate. Further increasing the catalyst loading to 20 mol% supported this observation, with cis-CHC selectivity reaching 85 mol%, while trans-CHC remained around 10 mol% and oligocarbonate at 5 mol%.
To gain structural insight into the role of trans-CHD in the coupling reaction, cis-cyclohexane diol was used as a control. While the trans-CHD/P4 system enabled moderate CHO conversion (51 mol%) and yielded various carbonates, the cis-CHD/P4 system showed little to no CHO transformation. We hypothesize that the alkoxide generated from cyclohexane diol and P4 interacts with CO2 to form a complex, where the complex derived from cis-CHD forms a more stable structure, resulting in lower nucleophilicity for the reaction.
This was further investigated through theoretical study. The complex structures were optimized using density functional theory (DFT) at the B3LYP/6-311G(2d,p) level. The Mulliken charge of the optimized structures revealed that the sp3-hybridized oxygen of carbonate in the cis complex is lower than in its trans counterpart (−0.47 vs. −0.54 eV), suggesting that the cis complex has reduced nucleophilicity (Figure 5).
With an understanding of the geometry of trans-CHD, we next investigated the effect of the ratio between trans-CHD and P4. When the trans-CHD-to-P4 ratio was set at 1:2, allowing complete conversion of the diol to alkoxide, the coupling reaction produced cis-CHC with very high selectivity (≥99 mol%). Increasing the trans-CHD/P4 ratio to 4:1 with 5 mol% catalyst loading relative to P4 resulted in low selectivity for cis-CHC (approx. 15 mol%) but relatively high selectivity for trans-CHC (55 mol%) and oligocarbonate (29 mol%). Further increasing the trans-CHD/P4 ratio to 16:1 led to a significant yield of oligocarbonate (99 mol%).
The insights from the trans-CHD/P4-catalyzed coupling of CO2 and CHO suggest a plausible mechanism (Scheme 2). The deprotonated trans-CHD interacts with CO2, forming a carbonate active center that resists back-biting to yield cyclic carbonate. Instead, this active center can react with CHO to produce a dimer, leading to either trans-CHC or cis-CHC through a back-biting process. These cyclic carbonates then undergo ring-opening to generate oligocarbonate. As the trans-CHD/P4 ratio increases, oligocarbonate selectivity is enhanced, suggesting that the in situ transformation of cis-CHC follows a transesterification process with trans-CHD, thereby forming polycarbonate oligocarbonate.

3. Materials

trans-Cyclohexane diol (≥98%) and cyclohexane oxide (≥98%) were purchased from Energy Chemical Company (Shanghai, China). Both cyclohexane diols were dried over anhydrous THF through azeotropic distillation; cyclohexane oxide was dried over CaH2 and stored in a glovebox for further use. tert-Bu-P4 solution (0.8 M in n-hexane) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Carbon dioxide gas (≥99%) was purchased from Newradar gas company (Wuhan, China).

3.1. Instruments

1H NMR (400 MHz) spectra were recorded on Brucker spectrometer at 273 K using chloroformed-d (CDCl3) as solvent. Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) was performed on a Waters Alliance 2695 equipped with columns (Waters Styragel HR3, HR4, HR5, Waters, Milford, MA, USA). SEC experiments were carried out in THF at the flow rate of 1.0 mL/min at 35 °C. FTIR spectra of resulted mixture were obtained on an Alpha Bruker Platinum—ATR spectrometer in the range from 4000 cm−1 to 400 cm−1 at a resolution of 4 cm−1 (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). A total of 24 scans were taken for each sample.

3.2. Experimental Procedures

Coupling CO2 and cyclohexane oxide (CHO) catalyzed by trans-CHD and P4 was performed in Ar-filled glovebox. Briefly, CHO (0.98 g, 10 mmol), trans-CHD (580 mg, 0.5 mmol), and P4 (316 mg, 0.5 mmol) were charged into a flame-dried flask (20 mL). The CO2 balloon was set at the top of flask and the flask was flushed to yield a CO2 atmosphere. The reaction mixture was stirred at 85 °C for 24 h and quenched by benzoic acid for 1H NMR spectroscopy analysis (see Figure S1).

4. Conclusions

A highly efficient, metal-free catalytic system for the coupling of CO2 and cyclohexane oxide has been developed. The combination of trans-CHD and P4 successfully enabled tunable product selectivity under mild conditions. Increasing the catalyst loading significantly improved CHO conversion and controlled the formation of cyclic carbonates and oligocarbonates. Additionally, theoretical calculations highlighted structural stability differences between cis-CHC and trans-CHC, offering insights into the observed selectivity. This study presents a green, efficient, and versatile catalytic approach for CO2 valorization and provides a theoretical foundation for the development of more complex metal-free catalytic systems in the future.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/catal14110822/s1, Figure S1: The experimental setup for CO2 and CHO coupling.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.M. and W.P.; Validation, W.P.; Formal analysis, X.M.; Investigation, X.M.; Writing—original draft, X.M.; Writing—review & editing, W.P.; Supervision, W.P.; Funding acquisition, W.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to due to the privacy.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Xuesuo Ma and Weiqing Pan were employed by the company Zhejiang Shenyao Petrochemical Technology Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hepburn, C.; Adlen, E.; Beddington, J.; Carter, E.A.; Fuss, S.; Mac Dowell, N.; Minx, J.C.; Smith, P.; Williams, C.K. The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal. Nature 2019, 575, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Styring, P.; McCord, S.; Rackley, S. Chapter 17—Carbon dioxide utilization. In Negative Emissions Technologies for Climate Change Mitigation; Rackley, S., Andrews, G., Clery, D., De Richter, R., Dowson, G., Knops, P., Li, W., McCord, S., Ming, T., Sewel, A., et al., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 391–413. [Google Scholar]
  3. Sakakura, T.; Choi, J.-C.; Yasuda, H. Transformation of Carbon Dioxide. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2365–2387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Grignard, B.; Gennen, S.; Jérôme, C.; Kleij, A.W.; Detrembleur, C. Advances in the use of CO2 as a renewable feedstock for the synthesis of polymers. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 4466–4514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Morgan, K.M.; Ellis, J.A.; Lee, J.; Fulton, A.; Wilson, S.L.; Dupart, P.S.; Dastoori, R. Thermochemical Studies of Epoxides and Related Compounds. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 4303–4311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Martín, C.; Fiorani, G.; Kleij, A.W. Recent Advances in the Catalytic Preparation of Cyclic Organic Carbonates. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 1353–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wu, X.; Chen, C.; Guo, Z.; North, M.; Whitwood, A.C. Metal- and Halide-Free Catalyst for the Synthesis of Cyclic Carbonates from Epoxides and Carbon Dioxide. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 1895–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kim, C.; Yoo, C.-J.; Oh, H.-S.; Min, B.K.; Lee, U. Review of carbon dioxide utilization technologies and their potential for industrial application. J. CO2 Util. 2022, 65, 102239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hazari, N.; Iwasawa, N.; Hopmann, K.H. Organometallic Chemistry for Enabling Carbon Dioxide Utilization. Organometallics 2020, 39, 1457–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gonsalvi, L.; Mordini, A.; Peruzzini, M. Organometallic Chemistry and Challenges in CO2 Activation and Utilization. Chem. Int. 2019, 41, 46–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xie, W.; Xu, J.; Idros, U.M.; Katsuhira, J.; Fuki, M.; Hayashi, M.; Yamanaka, M.; Kobori, Y.; Matsubara, R. Metal-free reduction of CO2 to formate using a photochemical organohydride-catalyst recycling strategy. Nat. Chem. 2023, 15, 794–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sreejyothi, P.; Mandal, S.K. From CO2 activation to catalytic reduction: A metal-free approach. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 10571–10593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Singh, G.; Nagaraja, C. Highly efficient metal/solvent-free chemical fixation of CO2 at atmospheric pressure conditions using functionalized porous covalent organic frameworks. J. CO2 Util. 2021, 53, 101716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pescarmona, P.P. Cyclic carbonates synthesised from CO2: Applications, challenges and recent research trends. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2021, 29, 100457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yan, T.; Liu, H.; Zeng, Z.; Pan, W. Recent progress of catalysts for synthesis of cyclic carbonates from CO2 and epoxides. J. CO2 Util. 2023, 68, 102355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vagnoni, M.; Samorì, C.; Galletti, P. Choline-based eutectic mixtures as catalysts for effective synthesis of cyclic carbonates from epoxides and CO2. J. CO2 Util. 2020, 42, 101302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, Z.; Fan, F.; Xing, H.; Yang, Q.; Bao, Z.; Ren, Q. Efficient Synthesis of Cyclic Carbonates from Atmospheric CO2 Using a Positive Charge Delocalized Ionic Liquid Catalyst. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 2841–2846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Seong, Y.; Lee, S.; Cho, S.; Kim, Y.; Kim, Y. Organocatalysts for the Synthesis of Cyclic Carbonates under the Conditions of Ambient Temperature and Atmospheric CO2 Pressure. Catalysts 2024, 14, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Deacy, A.C.; Kilpatrick, A.F.R.; Regoutz, A.; Williams, C.K. Understanding metal synergy in heterodinuclear catalysts for the copolymerization of CO2 and epoxides. Nat. Chem. 2020, 12, 372–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Trott, G.; Saini, P.K.; Williams, C.K. Catalysts for CO2/epoxide ring-opening copolymerization. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2016, 374, 20150085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.-Y.; Hu, L.-F.; Zhang, X.-H.; Du, B.-Y.; Xu, J.-T. Carbon dioxide-based copolymers with various architectures. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2018, 82, 120–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Darensbourg, D.J. Chain transfer agents utilized in epoxide and CO2 copolymerization processes. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 2214–2223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, D.; Boopathi, S.K.; Hadjichristidis, N.; Gnanou, Y.; Feng, X. Metal-Free Alternating Copolymerization of CO2 with Epoxides: Fulfilling “Green” Synthesis and Activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 11117–11120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Guo, W.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, X. Phosphine-Borane Frustrated Lewis Pairs for Metal-Free CO2/Epoxide Copolymerization. Macromolecules 2023, 56, 4901–4909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, G.-W.; Xu, C.-K.; Xie, R.; Zhang, Y.-Y.; Lu, C.; Qi, H.; Yang, L.; Wang, Y.; Wu, G.-P. Precision copolymerization of CO2 and epoxides enabled by organoboron catalysts. Nat. Synth. 2022, 1, 892–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Organocatalytic selectively coupling of CO2 and cyclohexane oxide.
Scheme 1. Organocatalytic selectively coupling of CO2 and cyclohexane oxide.
Catalysts 14 00822 sch001
Figure 1. 1H NMR spectrum of the resulting mixture yielded from coupling CO2 and CHO catalyzed by trans-CHD/P4; reaction conditions: [trans-CHD]:[P4] = 1:1, 5 mol% with respect to CHO, 85 °C for 24 h. * is the chemical shift of methine group for oligomer.
Figure 1. 1H NMR spectrum of the resulting mixture yielded from coupling CO2 and CHO catalyzed by trans-CHD/P4; reaction conditions: [trans-CHD]:[P4] = 1:1, 5 mol% with respect to CHO, 85 °C for 24 h. * is the chemical shift of methine group for oligomer.
Catalysts 14 00822 g001
Figure 2. SEC curve of resulted in oligocarbonate from CO2 and CHO coupling.
Figure 2. SEC curve of resulted in oligocarbonate from CO2 and CHO coupling.
Catalysts 14 00822 g002
Figure 3. The overall conversion vs. reaction time (a); the differences in selectivity with the time evolution (b). Experimental conditions: [trans-CHD]:[P4] = 1:1; 5 mol% with respect to CHO; 85 °C for 24 h.
Figure 3. The overall conversion vs. reaction time (a); the differences in selectivity with the time evolution (b). Experimental conditions: [trans-CHD]:[P4] = 1:1; 5 mol% with respect to CHO; 85 °C for 24 h.
Catalysts 14 00822 g003
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of resulted mixture from CO2 and CHO coupling reaction.
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of resulted mixture from CO2 and CHO coupling reaction.
Catalysts 14 00822 g004
Figure 5. The simulation of active carbonate complex, where the cis complex is more stable in comparison to trans analog, as demonstrated by the charge of oxygen. Calculation level: B3LYP/6-311G(2d,p) level.
Figure 5. The simulation of active carbonate complex, where the cis complex is more stable in comparison to trans analog, as demonstrated by the charge of oxygen. Calculation level: B3LYP/6-311G(2d,p) level.
Catalysts 14 00822 g005
Scheme 2. The plausible mechanism of coupling CO2 and CHO using trans-CHD and P4 as the catalysts.
Scheme 2. The plausible mechanism of coupling CO2 and CHO using trans-CHD and P4 as the catalysts.
Catalysts 14 00822 sch002
Table 1. Selective coupling of CO2 and cyclohexane oxide using P4 and trans-CHD as the binary catalyst a.
Table 1. Selective coupling of CO2 and cyclohexane oxide using P4 and trans-CHD as the binary catalyst a.
Entry[trans-CHD]:[P4]Time/hConversion/mol%trans-CHC/
mol%
cis-CHC/
mol%
OligocarbonateMn SEC g/molĐ
11:124531833566001.45
21:024N.A. fN.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.
30:124N.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.
4 b1:12491<190<1N.A.N.A.
5 c1:124324628263001.26
61:148594242164501.30
71:172801850323901.35
8 d1:124801062283301.42
9 e1:1249210855N.A.N.A.
101:22460<1>99<1N.A.N.A.
1116:12454<1<1>996701.43
a Experimental conditions: catalyst loading, 5 mol%; T = 85 °C; nCHO = 10 mmol; the conversion of CHO and selectivity of products were characterized by 1H NMR spectroscopy; b T = 105 °C; c T= 65 °C; d catalyst loading, 10 mol%; e catalyst loading, 20 mol%, f not available.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, X.; Pan, W. Coupling Carbon Dioxide and Cyclohexane Oxide Using Metal-Free Catalyst with Tunable Selectivity of Product Under Mild Conditions. Catalysts 2024, 14, 822. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14110822

AMA Style

Ma X, Pan W. Coupling Carbon Dioxide and Cyclohexane Oxide Using Metal-Free Catalyst with Tunable Selectivity of Product Under Mild Conditions. Catalysts. 2024; 14(11):822. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14110822

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Xuesuo, and Weiqing Pan. 2024. "Coupling Carbon Dioxide and Cyclohexane Oxide Using Metal-Free Catalyst with Tunable Selectivity of Product Under Mild Conditions" Catalysts 14, no. 11: 822. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14110822

APA Style

Ma, X., & Pan, W. (2024). Coupling Carbon Dioxide and Cyclohexane Oxide Using Metal-Free Catalyst with Tunable Selectivity of Product Under Mild Conditions. Catalysts, 14(11), 822. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14110822

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop