Next Article in Journal
Insights into the Recent Progress and Advanced Materials for Photocatalytic Nitrogen Fixation for Ammonia (NH3) Production
Previous Article in Journal
Direct Dehydrogenative Coupling of Alcohols with Hydrosilanes Promoted by Sodium tri(sec-butyl)borohydride
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Catalysts
Volume 8
Issue 12
10.3390/catal8120620
catalysts-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Non-Classical Anionic Naked N-Heterocyclic Carbenes: Fundamental Properties and Emerging Applications in Synthesis and Catalysis

by
Mei Yi Leow
,
Curtis C. Ho
,
Michael G. Gardiner
and
Alex C. Bissember
*
School of Natural Sciences—Chemistry, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2018, 8(12), 620; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8120620
Submission received: 1 November 2018 / Revised: 21 November 2018 / Accepted: 22 November 2018 / Published: 4 December 2018
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Ongoing research exploring the chemistry of N-heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs) has led to the development and discovery of new NHC subclasses that deviate beyond Arduengo’s prototypical N,N′-disubstituted imidazol-2-ylidene-based structures. These systems continue to enable and extend the fundamental role of NHC ligands in synthesis and catalysis. In this regard, the advent of protic NHCs has garnered particular interest. This derives in part from their applications to the selective preparation of unique molecular scaffolds and their unprecedented bifunctional reactivity, which can be exploited in transition metal-catalyzed processes. In comparison, the synthetic applications of closely related anionic naked NHCs remain rather underexplored. With this in mind, this review highlights the interesting fundamental properties of non-classical anionic naked NHCs, and focuses on their emerging applications in synthesis and catalysis.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

N-Heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs) have emerged as an integral component of contemporary coordination chemistry (Figure 1A). Since the isolation of the first stable free carbene species by Bertrand et al. in 1988 [1], and the first stable NHC by Arduengo et al. in 1991 [2], NHCs are now routinely utilized as versatile supporting ligands in metal complexes, and form the basis of many valuable catalyst systems that mediate an array of synthetic transformations [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. The extent of research devoted to NHCs has led to the development and discovery of new NHC subclasses that have deviated from Arduengo’s classical imidazol-2-ylidene based NHCs, thus expanding the structural and electronic diversity of this class of compounds and their associated applications. These modifications include forming carbenes on alternative carbon positions (i.e., abnormal or mesoionic carbenes) [12], featuring ring saturation [13], changing ring size [14,15,16,17], using fused ring systems [18,19,20,21], acyclic analogues [22], and even multidentate carbene ligands [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30].
A common feature of the aforementioned NHC subclasses is disubstitution of the NHC nitrogen atoms with alkyl or aryl substituents, which are collectively classified as “classical” NR,NR-NHC ligands (Figure 1A). Recent developments have led to the emergence of NHC ligands where one or both N-substituents are replaced with a hydrogen atom resulting in NH,NR or NH,NH-substitution patterns affording ligands known as protic NHCs (Figure 1B). These species have enjoyed significant interest owing to their unique ligand hydrogen bonding interactions and associated properties, which allow the corresponding NHC metal complexes to display valuable reactivity when applied in stereoselective macrocycle formation and catalytic processes, for example. Deprotonated NH,NR-NHCs represent another subclass of non-classical NHC ligands known as anionic naked N,NR NHCs, and are often isolated as their corresponding N-metalated complexes. These anionic NHCs differ from NHC ligands bearing anionic substituents and mixed abnormal/normal NHCs in that the unsubstituted nitrogen atom carries a formal negative charge (Figure 1C).
NHC chemistry has been the subject of many reviews highlighting their unique properties and applications in synthesis [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. With this in mind, this review aims to provide an overview of recent advances in the preparation and synthetic applications of metal complexes bearing non-classical NHCs; in particular, anionic NM,NR-NHC and naked N,NR-NHC ligands. Progress in the preparation of the closely related protic NHCs and their applications in metal-mediated reactions will not be discussed in detail, as a recent review by Hahn and Kuwata covered this topic extensively [31]. To our knowledge, a review of anionic NM,NR-NHCs and naked N,NR-NHCs has not been published to date. Consequently, this review focuses on imidazole-based anionic NHCs with N,NR substitution patterns, thus excluding mixed normal/abnormal classical NR,NR NHCs which are anionic due to deprotonation of the azolium salt at two different sites (Figure 2) [32,33,34,35,36]. Specifically, the fundamental structural and electronic properties of these systems and their applications in synthesis are discussed. It should be noted that due to the emerging nature of this class of non-classical NHCs, only a handful of examples of the applications of these systems in catalysis have been reported to date. With this in mind, a primary aim of this review is to draw attention to the intrinsic and enabling fundamental properties of these anionic NM,NR-NHCs and naked N,NR-NHCs and highlight potential opportunities that may be explored to exploit the interesting and innate reactivity provided by this class of molecules in catalysis.

2. Non-Classical NHCs and Their Metal Complexes

2.1. Protic NHC Metal Complexes

The most acidic proton in an NH,NR or NH,NH imidazolium salt is attached to the nitrogen atom, and not the C2 carbon. For this reason, the treatment of such a salt with base results in the regioselective deprotonation of the nitrogen atom and isomerization into the corresponding imidazole, rather than producing the free carbene. This has prevented the isolation of protic NHCs in their free form, and to date, these species have only been reported as their metal complexes. In principle, these protic NHC complexes could isomerize to the N-coordinated imidazole complex, but this is seldom observed in practice (Scheme 1) [37]. While imidazole is more thermodynamically stable than its protic free NHC tautomer, the high energy barrier that is calculated for the required 1,2-hydrogen shift suggests that the latter is kinetically favored [38,39]. Theoretical studies of the relative stabilities of the C-bound and N-bound tautomers suggest that strongly π-basic metal centers, hydrogen bonding at the N–H site(s), and the presence of ligands that cannot exert strong trans influences can stabilize the C-bound over the N-bound complex [40,41].
With the above-mentioned issues in mind, other strategies were developed to access protic NHC complexes, such as the metal-templated cyclisation of isocyanides and nitrogen-containing nucleophiles. Under basic conditions, a pre-coordinated metal isocyanide may be reacted with phenylisocyanate or phenylthioisocyanate to give protic NHC complexes bearing exocyclic oxy anions or thiolate functions, respectively (Scheme 2A) [42]. These versatile backbone substituents may undergo further alkylation or acylation, or act as monodentate donors. 2-bromoethylamine [43] and aziridine [44] may also be used as cyclization partners to form protic imidazolidin-2-ylidenes (Scheme 2B).
In cases where the isocyanide and nucleophile are contained within the same molecule, protic NHC complexes may be accessed via the intramolecular 1,2-addition across the C–N triple bond. This approach has been particularly successful in the preparation of backbone-saturated [45] and benzannulated protic NHCs (Scheme 2C) [46,47]. In a variation of this method, the isocyanide complex is generated in situ from an aminophosphinimine ligand [48]. Other methods involve the metalation of a preformed N-heterocycle bearing a labile N-protecting group that can later be cleaved to reveal the protic NHC complex (Scheme 2D) [49,50], C2 lithiation followed by transmetalation and N-protonation (Scheme 2E) [51,52,53,54], and finally the acid-induced or base-induced carbene/imidazole tautomerization from N-metalated imidazole metal complexes (Scheme 2F) [55,56].
In practice, the conversion of N-metalated imidazole complexes into their protic NHC tautomers is often the most convenient and versatile synthetic route, as post-metalation functionalization of the heterocycle can be difficult. The presence of chelating directors further encourages and stabilizes the resulting NHC metal complex, preventing tautomerization to the N-metalated form [57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65]. For example, Scheme 3A features an interesting transformation that converts osmium complex 1 to species 2, and the transition metal center switches ligand donor atoms from nitrogen to the NHC carbon [58]. Presumably, the Lewis basicity of the chelating director influences N-metalation, as no N-metalated intermediate is observed in the presence of a pendant phosphine donor for the transformation of complex 3 to species 4 (Scheme 3B) [57]. These types of transformations are thought to be operative in various proposed catalytic cycles involving protic NHC ligands displaying reversible deprotonation at the acidic N–H site.
N-(2-Pyridyl)benzimidazole (5) can be allylated at the C2 position to give compound 6 in a Ru-catalyzed dehydrative C–C coupling reaction (Scheme 4) [59]. It is suggested that the process commences with the insertion of a ruthenium species into the C2–H bond of benzimidazole 5 to give isolable intermediate 7, which then coordinates to allyl alcohol. Next, the N–H proton and hydroxyl group in complex 8 are lost as water to give imidazol-2-yl allyl complex 9. Facile elimination is expected due to the dual binding mode of the olefinic alcohol in species 8. Reductive elimination of heterocycle 6 from intermediate 10 then occurs. Notably, compound 10 is also accessible via the stoichiometric reaction of species 7 and allyl alcohol. Similar processes are also proposed for the Rh-catalyzed intramolecular alkylation and the arylation of azoles, and analogous nitrogen/NHC carbon atom donor switching is invoked [59,66,67,68].
The above-mentioned examples reinforce suggestions that the deprotonation of the N–H site of a protic NHC generates an anionic nitrogen donor atom that may serve as a viable coordination site in the formation of naked N,NR NHC metal complexes, NM,NR-free NHC complexes, or even C/N bimetallic complexes. Indeed, deprotonation-induced reactions of protic NHC complexes have been developed to access a variety of transformations. This was first demonstrated by Angelici et al. in 1987 [69], in which the deprotonation of protic oxazolidin-2-ylidene iron complex 11 and the subsequent addition of electrophiles afforded a range of N-functionalized metal complexes 13 (Scheme 5). Hahn et al. have further exploited this reactivity for the template synthesis of organometallic macrocycles [70] and the stereoselective synthesis of facially coordinated tridentate mixed donor ligands [71,72,73,74,75]. Of particular interest is the intermediate 12, which features a nitrogen atom bearing a formal negative charge, and its corresponding bimetallic complex 13c. From the aforementioned examples, it is evident that studies involving protic NHCs have often uncovered interesting structures, which constitute so-called anionic NM,NR and naked N,NR NHCs (hereafter abbreviated collectively as N,NR NHCs).

2.2. Anionic NM,NR and Naked N,NR NHC Metal Complexes

N,NR NHCs were well-known before they became more widely recognized as anionic NHCs within the broader chemical community. In 1995, Boche et al. described a dimeric lithiated thiazol-2-yl compound 14 as a formyllithium equivalent (Figure 3) [76]. In contrast to common organolithium reagents such as methyllithium or butyllithium in which the alkyl component is typically regarded as a carbanion, these researchers argue that complex 14 exhibits a singlet carbene character in its crystal structure. A comparison with thiazole revealed that structure 14 experienced lengthening of the C2–N and C2–S bonds and shrinking of the N–C2–S angle from 115.1(8)° to 107.9(2)°, which mirrors the structural trends associated with moving from an imidazolium cation to an imidazol-2-ylidene. While the C2–N1 and C2–N3 bonds in imidazol-2-ylidenes are usually identical in length, a meaningful comparison cannot be made for species 14, as the carbene carbon is flanked by two different heteroatoms.
Hahn et al. were the first to introduce the term “anionic NHC” when they reported complex 17, which was one of the products isolated from the oxidative addition of zero-valent Group 10 metals to benzimidazole 15 (Scheme 6) [77]. These authors had previously alluded to the intermediacy of an anionic benzimidazole in the synthesis of protic NHC complexes via this oxidative addition route. It was determined that in the absence of a proton source, such as NH4BF4, an oxidative addition to chloride 15 did not lead to protic NHC complexes 19 and 20. Instead, N,NR complex 17 and its dimer 16 were obtained in a 4:1 ratio. The reaction of [Pt(PPh3)4] and 2-chloro-N-picolylbenzimidazole also afforded a similar dimeric product, suggesting that the formation of N(M),NR complexes under aprotic conditions may be generalized to other 2-halobenzimidazoles [77].

2.3. Carbene or Carbanion?

An important question that was posed when imidazol-2-ylidenes 21 were first discovered was whether deprotonation gives rise to a carbene or a carbanion. The Arduengo group endeavored to answer this question by using a combination of theoretical and experimental approaches. If the deprotonated azol-2-yl in question is indeed a carbanion, one should observe regions of high electron density or localized negative charge on a carbon atom that also participates in π-bonding interactions. However, Mulliken charge calculations for imidazol-2-ylidene estimate that most of the negative charge is borne by the nitrogen atoms, with only a small fraction residing on the carbene atom [78]. Electron density maps derived from the neutron diffraction data of 1,3,4,5-tetramethylimidazol-2-ylidene (IMe) showed that most of the electron density within the ring was localized on the nitrogen atoms. This is perhaps a predictable result in light of the higher electronegativity of nitrogen relative to carbon [78]. The π electron densities surrounding the C2–N and exocyclic C–N bonds are similarly low, indicating that bonds connected to C2 have a minimal double-bond character. A minima for π electron density was found on C2. In addition, deformation density maps reveal a concentrated region of electron density at C2 in the plane of the molecule, which evolved into a pronounced deficit above the plane. This is consistent with C2 having an in-plane lone pair and a vacant π-orbital. In contrast, other endocyclic atoms exhibit little distortion in their nuclear positions. The electron density maps generated by density functional theory (DFT) studies were in excellent agreement with the empirically derived maps, suggesting that accurate models of electron distribution in NHCs can be made this way. When taken together, these data strongly support the interpretation of IMe as a carbene rather than a carbanion.
It is instructive to employ the same structural and electronic reasoning developed by Boche and Arduengo to establish whether or not the N,NR complex 17 is a carbene. From a structural point of view, species 17 is perhaps best described as having partial azole and partial NHC character. N-methyladamantylbenzimidazole and benzimidazole will be used as references for the parent azole, as structural data for 2-chloro-N-methylbenzimidazole (15) is not available. The key bond lengths and angles are summarized in Table 1. Compared to the neutral azoles, the N1–C2–N3 angles in compounds 20 and 18 are smaller, which is a feature that is associated with NHC formation. The same decrease in the N1–C2–N3 angle is observed for complex 16, albeit to a lesser extent. The C2–Pt bond lengths in complex 17, its protonated form species 20, and the chloromethylated form 18 are relatively similar to one another, signifying that all three heterocycles possess similar donor/acceptor properties. This could mean that, similar to the other two complexes, structure 17 is also a carbene.
As noted earlier, another characteristic feature of NHC formation is the presence of C2–N1 and C2–N3 bonds of approximately equal lengths (but longer than the corresponding bonds in neutral azoles). This change is evident for the NHC complexes 20 and 18, with a marked lengthening of the C2–N3 bond that ultimately results in a negligible difference between the C2–N1 and C2–N3 bond lengths. However, in species 17, the C2–N1 bond becomes significantly longer than that in the neutral azoles and the NHC complexes, while the C2–N3 bond length is typical of neutral azoles. The disparity in C2–N1 and C2–N3 bond lengths for structure 17 exceeds the values observed for neutral azoles. This C2–N1 and C2–N3 bond length asymmetry appears to be characteristic of anionic azol-2-yl ligands in general [59,72].
Based largely on the stark difference in the C2–N1 and C2–N3 bond lengths, Hahn et al. initially assigned the structure-type 22b to complex 17, where the C2 atom and short C2–N1 bond are represented as an acyl-like anion and a double bond, respectively (Figure 4). However, this interpretation was contradicted by their natural bonding orbital (NBO) charge calculations for the N,NR ligand in species 17. The calculated NBO charges suggest that the region with the highest electron density is found on N3 followed by N1, while C2 appears to be electron-deficient. DFT calculations support this, with these data indicating that the maximum negative electrostatic potential (of comparable value to Cl−) is located close to N2. Overall, the NBO and DFT models of species 17 are more consistent with a carbene flanked by an anionic nitrogen, as depicted in structure 22a.
Hahn et al. note that the C2 resonance appears further upfield in the 13C NMR spectrum of complex 17 than for derivatives 19 and 18. Although an extreme downfield shift is usually expected for a carbenic resonance, this may not necessarily suggest that the C2 within complex 17 is not a carbene. Rather, the upfield position of the resonance may be viewed as a consequence of the greater shielding experienced by C2, due to the higher electron density surrounding the adjacent anionic nitrogen. The upfield shift in the C2 resonance going from an NH/R,NR NHC complex to an N(M),NR NHC species has also been observed for other metals [65].
Finally, the reactivity of complex 17 further supports the assignment of the negative charge on N3 instead of C2. The dinuclear species 16 results from adduct formation between the Lewis basic unsubstituted nitrogen and the Lewis acidic metal center in a second molecule of species 17. The anionic nitrogen in complex 17 is strongly nucleophilic, and will attack electrophiles such as dichloromethane to produce the classical NHC complex 19. On balance, the structural, electronic, and reactivity data provide sufficient justification that structure 17 can be considered an anionic NHC. However, the term has not been widely adopted, which is possibly due to the challenges involved in making the subtle distinction between a carbanion and an anionic carbene. Most of the N(M),NR compounds in the literature are still named azol-2-yls, which is perhaps for this reason.

2.4. Preparation of N(M),NR Complexes and Applications to Synthesis and Catalysis

N,NR complexes are probably most easily prepared by the deprotonation of an NH,NR complex with a suitable base [59,61,64]. Product 24 is generated from the treatment of the protic NHC complex 23 with NaOMe and NaH. Subsequent chloride abstraction results in the formation of derivative 25 featuring a vacant coordination site that can activate hydrogen and acetylene, affording products 26 and 27, respectively (Scheme 7A). Similar to protic NHCs, species 24 can undergo N-methylation with methyl triflate to give a classical NR,NR NHC complex. The Ir–C2 bond length in complex 24 measures 2.059(3) Å, which is approximately 0.033 Å longer than the corresponding bond within structure 23. This potentially suggests that in this example, the anionic NHC is a slightly weaker donor than its protic NHC congener. Related Ir(III) hydride complex 28 could be reduced to Ir(I) by hydride abstraction using n-butyllithium (Scheme 7B). Ensuing lithium adduct 29 is an NM,NR NHC complex, and its associated 13C NMR spectrum features a signal that is consistent with a carbene resonance (δ 150 ppm). This is almost 20 ppm further downfield from the analogous 13C NMR signal for complex 28. Interestingly, the reaction of species 29 with methyl triflate or 1-iodobutane leads to alkylation at the metal instead of the nitrogen, and concomitant oxidation of the metal center to provide the corresponding Ir(III) compound 30.
The utility of heterobimetallic NM,NR complexes such as species 29 derives, in part, from their susceptibility to ligand exchange on the NHC-bound metal center, particularly when the exchange is driven by the precipitation of an insoluble lithium salt. Indeed, N-lithiated ruthenium complex 31 reacts with hydrogen, leading to the protic NHC/hydride complex 32, and readily coordinates with ethylene to form 33 (Scheme 8) [61].
In some cases, metathesis occurs exclusively on N3, and the NHC-bound metal center is left unchanged when inorganic metal salts are used. Therefore, NM,NR NHC complexes may allow access to a variety of heterobimetallic complexes with bridging NHC ligands. For example, Cossairt and Flowers highlighted the potential of NM,NR NHC complexes as ligand transfer agents in their synthesis of a tridentate bis(carbene) complex 34 (Scheme 9) [63]. Lithiation affords heterobimetallic species 35, and subsequent transmetalation provides access to new NM,NR NHC complexes, such as product 36.
Anionic NHC complex 38 can be prepared from precursor 37 using the aforementioned base-assisted deprotonation method. However, the Brønsted acidity of the N–H moiety within a protic NHC complex can also be exploited under base-free conditions to deliver a N,NR NHC complex. For example, chloride abstraction from species 37 by AgNO2 promotes an ensuing intramolecular proton migration. This generates a nitrosyl ligand from the nitrite ion via a dehydrative process, culminating in the formation of structure 38 after anion exchange with excess KOTf (Scheme 10) [59]. The authors also demonstrated that complexes 38 and 39 are interconvertible via acid/base-assisted protonation/deprotonation of the NHC nitrogen atom that enables switching between a protic and an anionic NHC motif. This property may find interesting applications in hydrogen transfer-type catalysis.
Another method that has been used to access N,NR NHC complexes is the deprotonation and tautomerization of imidazole ligands. For example, the tris(N-methylimidazole)rhenium(I) complex 40a can be deprotonated with KHMDS to give the N,NR NHC species 41. Structure 41 was determined via NMR spectroscopy and single crystal X-ray diffraction (Scheme 11) [55]. A resonance at 182.4 ppm in the 13C NMR spectrum was assigned to C2 within complex 41. This represents the furthest downfield signal associated with all of the N,NR NHC complexes that have been specifically discussed in this review thus far. Furthermore, protonation with strong acids such as triflic or trifluoroacetic acid afforded the NH,NR NHC product 42, which was consistent with the presence of the naked nitrogen moiety within intermediate 41.
A topological analysis of the Laplacian of the electron density was performed for structures 41 and 42 using X-ray diffraction data. Complexes 41 and 42 both exhibited large non-bonded charge concentrations perpendicular to the plane at N3. Compound 41 also displayed an in-plane non-bonded charge concentration of similar magnitude at N3. However, the same was not true of product 42, which instead showed a smaller bonded charge concentration. These observations are consistent with the presence of an in-plane lone pair on N3 for 41, which is replaced by an N–H covalent interaction within structure 42.
Interestingly, the N-substituents on the imidazole ligands have considerable bearing on the deprotonation outcome. If one or all of the methyl groups within complex 40a are replaced with a mesityl group, treatment with KHMDS results in the ring opening of an N-mesitylimidazole unit. It is thought that deprotonation takes place at the C2 position of one of the N-mesitylimidazole ligands, rapidly followed by the intramolecular attack of the NCHN moiety on an adjacent imidazole ligand by this nucleophilic C2 moiety. C–C coupling between the C2 atoms of two imidazole ligands and the ensuing ring-opening could furnish products 43b and 43c. DFT studies were employed to probe the reaction mechanism and suggest that the N-mesityl group enhances electron delocalization, and thus stabilizes, the transition state for the ring-opening step [81]. The amido-like nitrogen can be converted into the amine with the addition of acid to obtain species 44b and 44c in good yields. The N,NR NHC complex 41 can undergo a second metalation with [AuCl(PPh3)2] to give the NM,NR NHC heterobimetallic complex 45 (Scheme 12) [81]. Notably, the imidazolyl fragment tautomerizes to the Re–N-bound form to accommodate the C-binding preference of the Au(I) center.
A similar phenomenon has been observed in a manganese/gold system by Ruiz et al. (Scheme 13) [82]. In this case, manganese(I) imidazole complex 46 was transformed into the protic NHC complex 49. The authors propose that the deprotonation of species 46 leads to an N-bound anionic species 47, which isomerizes to C-bound analogue 48. Although neither of these intermediates could be isolated, infrared spectroscopic analysis determined decreased ν(CO) frequencies (~10 cm–1 on average) that were consistent with NHC formation. This is a reflection of the stronger donor capability of NHCs compared to their corresponding imidazole counterparts. Metalation of the NHC complex 49 was accomplished under basic conditions. Presumably, the soft gold(I) center initially coordinates to the hard anionic nitrogen on the NHC ligand, and subsequently undergoes a 1,2-migration in order to bind with the softer carbene donor to afford heterobimetallic product 50. The Mn–N bond within species 50 can be cleaved with perchloric acid to give the gold(I) protic NHC complex 51. This demonstrates that NM,NR NHC complexes of manganese(I) may serve as NH,NR carbene transfer agents for gold(I) species, which represents a complementary approach to the Ag2O transfer method. The latter strategy is limited to preparing NR,NR NHCs. The route depicted in Scheme 13 for the formation of manganese(I) protic NHC complexes can be extended to benzannulated heterocycles such as benzimidazole and benzoxazole. However, their use as carbene transfer agents is currently prevented by the instability of the corresponding manganese(I)/gold(I) heterobimetallic complexes [83].
Radius and Hering obtained N,NR platinum(II) complex 53 via the C–N bond cleavage of I(iPr) (Scheme 14) [84]. When this reaction was conducted in nonpolar solvents, such as toluene or benzene, the reaction of [Pt(PPh3)2(η2-C2H4)] (52) with excess I(iPr) generated species 53 as the major product, which occurred presumably via homoleptic bis-NHC platinum(II) complex 54. The evolution of propylene was detected during this transformation, which is consistent with the C–N bond cleavage of I(iPr) that was observed. When the analogous reaction was performed in hexanes, complex 54 precipitated from solution, which prevented subsequent reactions with free I(iPr). Indeed, the authors showed that reacting compound 54 with equimolar quantities of I(iPr) also affords product 53. Radius and Hering did not consider the imidazolyl fragment within complex 53 to display carbene character, which was in part because of the elongated Pt–Cimidazolyl bond relative to the Pt–CNHC bond. However, they acknowledged that this elongation may be due to the trans influence of the hydride ligand, and noted that a similar Pt–CNHC bond length had been reported for an abnormal NHC complex [85].
Since the carbene and carbanion represent resonance forms of each other, it is possible that these assignments are strongly dependent on the identity of the coordinated metal, and as such, these designations must be made on a case-by-case basis. For example, the uranyl complex 55 exhibits exceptionally short U–C bonds and an extreme downfield 13C NMR signal that is most consistent with a carbanionic imidazolyl ligand (Scheme 15) [86]. In contrast, the M–C bond lengths in the isomerized iron(II) and cobalt(II) derivatives 56a,b fall within the normal range expected for their respective NHC complexes. The new U–N bond is slightly shorter than those previously observed for U–Nimidazole complexes, which may be ascribed to the presence of a negative charge on the nitrogen atom. This suggests that the imidazolyl ligand may adopt the carbanionic resonance form when coordinated to the hard uranyl center, but undergoes electronic reconfiguration to become the carbene when bound to softer transition metal ions.
Evidence consistent with the existence of NM,NR-free NHCs have also been reported. Indeed, Ruiz et al. speculated that one such species (47, Scheme 13) may be an intermediate formed during the deprotonation of compound 46, prior to N–C migration of the manganese(I) ion [82]. Furthermore, it is conceivable that deprotonation and rhenium(I) migration onto the C-center from complex 40a proceeds via an NM,NR-free NHC species (Scheme 11). However, the isolation of such NM,NR-free NHCs have not been disclosed. Theoretical studies have invoked the formation of NM,NR-free NHC complexes in intriguing metal-catalyzed transformations. For example, DFT studies undertaken by Ariafard et al. exploring the mechanisms of two independent experimental reports of copper(I)-catalyzed carboxylation from the Hou and Nolan groups provide evidence implicating NM,NR-type free NHC complexes [87]. Hou et al. performed the direct insertion of CO2 into the C2–H bond of various N-heterocycles under relatively mild conditions (Scheme 16) [88].
Nolan and Cazin employed the closely related [Cu(IPr)(OH)] catalyst to install ester functionalities onto heteroarenes and polyfluorinated benzenes. These authors also applied the same chemistry to carboxylate N–H bonds of imidazoles, pyrazoles, and even oxygen-containing heterocycles such as 2-oxazolidinone [89]. Hou et al. proposed the catalytic cycle shown in Scheme 17; this cycle featured copper(I) intermediates 60 and 61, which were both isolated from the stoichiometric carboxylation of benzoxazole [88]. The mechanism that was put forward comprised three main steps: (i) first, the activation of the heterocyclic C–H bond by copper(I); (ii) CO2 insertion into the Cu–C bond, (iii) and finally, salt metathesis with KOt-Bu to regenerate the active catalyst [Cu(IPr)(OtBu)] and produce carboxylate salt 58, which ultimately provides ester product 59.
Although carbon dioxide is inexpensive, abundant, and low in toxicity, this species is a notoriously inert molecule due to its high thermodynamic stability. Thus, the independent reports disclosed by the Hou and Nolan groups represent significant advances in the development of efficient and alternative methods for harnessing carbon dioxide in synthesis, which may have important implications for future approaches for carbon capture, storage, and reuse. Furthermore, the relatively mild reaction conditions employed suggest the capacity for high functional group tolerance in these processes. In order to better understand the carboxylation process, Ariafard et al. conducted a detailed DFT investigation of the reaction mechanism proposed by Hou et al. [87].
Two possible pathways were identified for the first step of the catalytic cycle: namely, the protonolysis of [Cu(IPr)(OH)] by benzoxazole to form a copper(I) benzoxazole complex (Figure 5A). Pathway I proceeds via a four-membered transition structure TS-1a, where proton transfer from benzoxazole to the OH ligand and benzoxazolyl migration to the copper species occur simultaneously. Alternatively, the reaction may occur via pathway II, which contains transition structure TS-1b, on which the copper complex interacts with the nitrogen instead of the carbon atom of benzoxazole during proton transfer to OH. The loss of water from TS-1b affords an NM,NR-free NHC, which then isomerizes into the C-metalated benzoxazolyl. Since TS-1b and TS-1c are lower in energy than TS-1a, the authors suggest that pathway II is more kinetically favorable than pathway I.
The second step in the catalytic sequence concerns the insertion of carbon dioxide into the Cu–C bond of the copper(I) benzoxazolyl complex, resulting in a copper carboxylate complex (Figure 5B). The more conventional pathway III involves the nucleophilic attack of the Cu–C σ-bond on the electrophilic carbon atom within carbon dioxide, leading to four-membered transition structure TS-2a. The calculated energy barrier for this process is relatively high. However, Ariafard et al. were able to identify a second pathway with a lower energy barrier. This proposed mechanism, pathway IV, begins with the isomerization of the copper(I) benzoxazolyl complex into its N-metalated form. Remarkably, since the resulting NM,NR-free NHC is so much more nucleophilic than the Cu–C σ-bond, the functionalization of carbon dioxide is barrierless. The NM,NR-free NHC route also appeared to be the most energetically favorable for analogous CO2 activation by a gold(I) species [90,91]. These findings highlight the dual functionality of NM,NR-free NHCs, which contain a Lewis acidic metal center and a Lewis basic free carbene, and suggest potential opportunities for these species to be exploited in cooperative catalysis.
Other instances of transformations that are cocatalyzed by an organometallic complex and a free NHC have been reported. For example, Yu and Zhang suggest that polyNHC dendrimer 62 can serve as both a ligand and a catalyst in the direct carboxylation into the C–H bond of terminal alkynes, enabling the synthesis of functionalized propiolic acids (Figure 6) [92]. These authors observed that the carboxylation of model substrate 4-nitro-1-ethynylbenzene proceeded most efficiently when only half a molar equivalent of CuCl (relative to the polyNHC) was employed. The yield of the propiolic acid product decreased markedly when a stoichiometric amount of CuCl was used, while no reaction occurred in the absence of CuCl. This prompted them to postulate that both the copper–NHC complex and the free NHC were required for optimal catalytic performance. Presumably, the [Cu(NHC)Cl] and free NHC fragments cooperatively activate both the terminal alkyne and carbon dioxide in the presence of a base. The NHC carboxylate coordinates to the proximal copper atom, facilitating the nucleophilic attack of the acetylide carbanion on the carboxylate carbon. This links the alkyne and carboxyl moieties within propiolic acid, which can be exchanged for another alkyne unit at the copper center.
In the dendrimer prepared by Yu and Zhang, the copper–NHC and free NHC are remote from each other. However, in Hou and Nolan’s systems, the two functional sites in the putative NM,NR-free NHC intermediate are directly adjacent to each other. In fact, NM,NR-free NHCs could be viewed as the N-metalated tautomer 22a (Figure 4). It has already been shown that complexes bearing structural motifs, such as 22a, can activate hydrogen and acetylene gases, suggesting that it may be beneficial to ensure that the two complementary moieties are proximal. Given the general utility of the bifunctional ambident reactivity concept and encouraging evidence for the role of NM,NR-free NHCs in valuable carboxylation chemistry, further efforts directed toward the preparation and extensive study of these species is warranted. Certainly, this reactivity may extend beyond carbon dioxide to the activation of other inert small molecule feedstock chemicals.
To date, NM,NR-free NHCs have eluded isolation. Readers may have observed that there is little preventing the migration of the metal ion to the carbene, which forms the thermodynamically-favored complex in the preceding examples. DFT calculations estimate the energy separation between the copper–benzoxazolyl NM,NR-free NHC and its less energetic C-bound isomer at 15.4 kcal/mol (Figure 5). Perhaps with the appropriate structural modifications, this gap can be reduced to the point that the NM,NR-free NHC is stable enough to be isolated. Ideally, the barrier to tautomerization should be high so that the NM,NR-free NHC does not convert into the C-bound complex. The synthesis of protic NHC complexes encounter similar issues, so it is possible that strategies, such as using chelating pendant donors to direct the metal center onto a desired position, could be exploited in this domain.

3. Summary and Conclusions

Relative to the more established field of classical NHC chemistry, the fundamental understanding and applications of protic and naked NHCs is conspicuously lacking. The bonding nature of these non-classical carbenes remains a topic of debate and an area in which much remains to be discovered. As the knowledge and general understanding regarding the preparation and reactivity of protic and naked NHCs improves, their application in chemical synthesis will arguably become more widespread. It is possible that the synthetic applications of these systems may extend into chemical transformations that are traditionally performed by main group elements, such as a small molecule activation that is similar to the chemistry associated with frustrated Lewis pairs [93]. Furthermore, the aforementioned theoretical studies suggest the existence of N-metalated, NR-free NHC complexes in which the carbene moiety is available for cooperative reactivity [87].
Unlike classical NHCs, which tend to typically function solely as spectator ligands, the power of protic and naked NHC ligands relate to their non-innocent behavior, which is described by the bifunctional ambident reactivity concept. Their innate reactivity provides access to a rich variety of functionalized species, which lend themselves well to catalytic applications and processes that involve hydrogen bonding. The development of novel bifunctional catalysts may be enabled by utilizing this new subclass of NHCs. In addition, other applications may include exploiting these systems to facilitate the stereoselective synthesis of NHC-containing macrocycles and novel ligand scaffolds. Although protic and naked NHCs currently represent an emerging subclass of NHC molecules, their intrinsic properties and reactivity indicates that these systems have the capacity to contribute to broadening the power and scope of catalytic processes in the future.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

M.Y.L. thanks the University of Tasmania for a Tasmanian Graduate Research Scholarship.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Igau, A.; Grutzmacher, H.; Baceiredo, A.; Bertrand, G. Analogous α,α′-Bis-Carbenoid Triply Bonded Species: Synthesis of a Stable λ3-Phosphinocarbene-λ5-Phosphaacetylene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 6463–6466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Arduengo, A.J., III; Harlow, R.L.; Kline, M. A Stable Crystalline Carbene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 361–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Herrmann, W.A.; Elison, M.; Fischer, J.; Kocher, C.; Artus, G.R.J. Metal Complexes of N-Heterocyclic Carbenes—A New Structural Principle for Catalysts in Homogeneous Catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1995, 34, 2371–2374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Herrmann, W.A.; Kocher, C. N-Heterocyclic Carbenes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1997, 2162–2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Herrmann, W.A. N-Heterocyclic Carbenes: A New Concept in Organometallic Catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1290–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Crabtree, R.H. Carbenes in Synthesis and Homogeneous Catalysis. Oil Gas Sci. Technol. 2007, 62, 739–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Hahn, F.E.; Jahnke, M.C. Heterocyclic Carbenes: Synthesis and Coordination Chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3122–3172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Öfele, K.; Tosh, E.; Taubmann, C.; Herrmann, W.A. Carbocyclic Carbene Metal Complexes. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 3408–3444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Díez-González, S.; Marion, N.; Nolan, S.P. N-Heterocyclic Carbenes in Late Transition Metal Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 3612–3676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Bugaut, X.; Glorius, F. Organocatalytic umpolung: N-heterocyclic carbenes and beyond. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 3511–3522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Flanigan, D.M.; Romanov-Michailidis, F.; White, N.A.; Rovis, T. Organocatalytic Reactions Enabled by N-Heterocyclic Carbenes. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 9307–9387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Schuster, O.; Yang, L.; Raubenheimer, H.G.; Albrecht, M. Beyond Conventional N-Heterocyclic Carbenes: Abnormal, Remote, and Other Classes of NHC Ligands with Reduced Heteroatom Stabilization. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 3445–3478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Arduengo, A.J., III; Krafczyk, R.; Schmutzler, R.; Craig, H.A.; Goerlich, J.R.; Marshall, W.J.; Unverzagt, M. Imidazolylidenes, imidazolinylidenes and imidazolidines. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 14523–14534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Davies, C.J.E.; Page, M.J.; Ellul, C.E.; Mahon, M.F.; Whittlesey, M.K. Ni(I) and Ni(II) ring-expanded N-heterocyclic carbene complexes: C–H activation, indole elimination and catalytic hydrodehalogenation. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 5151–5153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hauwert, P.; Dunsford, J.J.; Tromp, D.S.; Weigand, J.J.; Lutz, M.; Cavell, K.J.; Elsevier, C.J. Zerovalent [Pd(NHC)(Alkene)1,2] Complexes Bearing Expanded-Ring N-Heterocyclic Carbene Ligands in Transfer Hydrogenation of Alkynes. Organometallics 2013, 32, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dunsford, J.J.; Cavell, K.J. Pd–PEPPSI-Type Expanded Ring N-Heterocyclic Carbene Complexes: Synthesis, Characterization, and Catalytic Activity in Suzuki–Miyaura Cross Coupling. Organometallics 2014, 33, 2902–2905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Türkmen, H.; Pape, T.; Hahn, F.E.; Çetinkaya, B. Annulated N-Heterocyclic Carbene Ligands Derived from 2-Methylaminopiperidine: Their Complexes and Catalytic Applications. Organometallics 2008, 27, 571–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Martin, D.; Lassauque, N.; Donnadieu, B.; Bertrand, G. A Cyclic Diaminocarbene with Pyramidalized Nitrogen Atom: A Stable N-Heterocyclic Carbene with Enhanced Nucleophilicity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 6172–6175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Yang, B.-M.; Xiang, K.; Tu, Y.-Q.; Zhang, S.-H.; Yang, D.-T.; Wang, S.-H.; Zhang, F.-M. Spiro-fused six-membered N-heterocyclic carbene: A new scaffold toward unique properties and activities. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 7163–7165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Rao, B.; Tang, H.; Zeng, X.; Liu, L.; Melaimi, M.; Bertrand, G. Cyclic (Amino)(aryl)carbenes (CAArCs) as Strong σ-Donating and π-Accepting Ligands for Transition Metals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 14915–14919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Peris, E.; Crabtree, R.H. Recent homogeneous catalytic applications of chelate and pincer N-heterocyclic carbenes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2004, 248, 2239–2246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Vignolle, J.; Cattoën, X.; Bourissou, D. Stable Noncyclic Singlet Carbenes. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 3333–3384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mata, J.A.; Poyatos, M.; Peris, E. Structural and catalytic properties of chelating bis- and tris-N-heterocyclic carbenes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2007, 251, 841–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pugh, D.; Danopoulos, A.A. Metal complexes with ‘pincer’-type ligands incorporating N-heterocyclic carbene functionalities. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2007, 251, 610–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Poyatos, M.; Mata, J.A.; Peris, E. Complexes with Poly(N-heterocyclic carbene) Ligands: Structural Features and Catalytic Applications. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 3677–3707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hopkinson, M.N.; Ritcher, C.; Schedler, M.; Glorius, F. An overview of N-heterocylic carbenes. Nature 2014, 510, 485–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zhang, D.; Zi, G. N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) complexes of group 4 transition metals. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 1898–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Peris, E. Smart N-Heterocyclic Carbene Ligands in Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 9988–10031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Charra, V.; de Fremont, P.; Braunstein, P. Multidentate N-heterocyclic carbene complexes of the 3d metals: Synthesis, structure, reactivity and catalysis. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2017, 341, 53–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gardiner, M.G.; Ho, C.C. Recent advances in bidentate bis(N-heterocyclic carbene) transition metal complexes and their applications in metal-mediated reactions. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018, 375, 373–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kuwata, S.; Hahn, F.E. Complexes Bearing Protic N-Heterocyclic Carbene Ligands. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 9642–9677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, M.; Namyslo, J.C.; Nieger, M.; Polamo, M.; Schmidt, A. From betaines to anionic N-heterocyclic carbenes. Borane, gold, rhodium, and nickel complexes starting from an imidazoliumphenolate and its carbene tautomer. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2016, 12, 2673–2681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. César, V.; Lugan, N.; Lavigne, G. A Stable Anionic N-Heterocyclic Carbene and Its Zwitterionic Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 11286–11287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Danopoulos, A.A.; Monakhov, K.Y.; Braunstein, P. Anionic N-Heterocyclic Carbene Ligands from Mesoionic Imidazolium Precursors: Remote Backbone Arylimino Substitution Directs Carbene Coordination. Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 450–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Liddle, S.T.; Edworthy, I.S.; Arnold, P.L. Anionic tethered N-heterocyclic carbene chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 1732–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Benhamou, L.; César, V.; Gornitzka, H.; Lugan, N.; Lavigne, G. Imidazol-2-ylidene-4-olate: An anionic N-heterocyclic carbene pre-programmed for further derivatization. Chem. Commun. 2009, 4720–4722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wang, X.; Chen, H.; Li, X. Ir(III)-induced C-bound to N-bound tautomerization of a N-heterocyclic carbene. Organometallics 2007, 26, 4684–4687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Heinemann, C.; Thiel, W. Ab initio study on the stability of diaminocarbenes. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1994, 217, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. McGibbon, G.A.; Heinemann, C.; Lavorato, D.J.; Schwarz, H. Imidazol-2-ylidene: Generation of a Missing Carbene and Its Dication by Neutralization- Reionization and Charge-Stripping Mass Spectrometry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1997, 36, 1478–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Häller, L.J.L.; Macgregor, S.A. Computational Study of the C- and N-Bound Tautomers of [Ru(Cl)(H)(CO)-(PPh3)2 (IiPrMe2)] (IiPrMe2 = 3-Isopropyl-4,5-dimethylimidazol-2-ylidene). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 2009, 2000–2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sini, G.; Eisenstein, O.; Crabtree, R.H. Preferential C-binding versus N-binding in imidazole depends on the metal fragment involved. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 602–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Fehlhammer, W.P.; Völkl, A.; Plaia, U.; Beck, G. Metallkomplexe funktioneller Isocyanide, XVI1) 1,3-Dipolare Cycloadditionen von Heteroallenen an die metallorganischen Nitrilylide [(OC)5M–C≡N–CHR]− (M = Cr, W; R = CO2Et). Chem. Ber. 1987, 120, 2031–2040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Michelin, R.A.; Zanotto, L.; Braga, D.; Sabatino, P.; Angelici, R.J. Transition-Metal-Promoted Cyclization Reactions of Isocyanide Ligands. Synthesis of Cyclic Diaminocarbenes from Isocyanide Complexes of Palladium(II) and Platinum(II) and X-ray Structure of cis-Br2Pt[CN(C6H4-p-Me)CH2CH2N(H)](PPh3). Inorg. Chem. 1988, 27, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Michelin, R.A.; Mozzon, M.; Zecca, M.; Corain, B.; Piazzi, O.; Zanotti, G. Palladium(II) cyclic carbene complexes from 3-isocyanopropylacrylate. X-ray structure of cis-{PdCl2(PPh3)[C–N(H)–(CH2)3–O–C(O)–CH–CH2]}. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1990, 174, 3–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hahn, F.E.; Langenhahn, V.; Pape, T. Template synthesis of tungsten complexes with saturated N-heterocyclic carbene ligands. Chem. Commun. 2005, 5, 5390–5392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kaufhold, O.; Flores-Figueroa, A.; Pape, T.; Hahn, F.E. Template Synthesis of Ruthenium Complexes with Saturated and Benzannulated NH,NH-Stabilized N-Heterocyclic Carbene Ligands. Organometallics 2009, 28, 896–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hahn, F.E.; Langenhahn, V.; Meier, N.; Lügger, T.; Fehlhammer, W.P. Template synthesis of benzannulated N-heterocyclic carbene ligands. Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 704–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, C.Y.; Chen, D.Y.; Lee, G.H.; Peng, S.M.; Liu, S.T. Synthesis of cyclic diamino-substituted metal carbene complexes. Organometallics 1996, 15, 1055–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Brendler, E.; Hill, A.F.; Wagler, J. A donor-stabilized silanethione or a Si-substituted N-heterocyclic platinum carbene? Chem. A Eur. J. 2008, 14, 11300–11304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dobereiner, G.E.; Chamberlin, C.A.; Schley, N.D.; Crabtree, R.H. Acyl protection strategy for synthesis of a protic NHC complex via N-acyl methanolysis. Organometallics 2010, 29, 5728–5731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fehlhammer, W.P.; Bliß, T.; Fuchs, J.; Holzmann, G. Tetrakis (N-alkylimidazolin-2-yliden) palladium and -platin. Zeitschrift für Naturforsch. B 1992, 59, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Meier, N.; Hahn, F.E.; Pape, T.; Siering, C.; Waldvogel, S.R. Molecular recognition utilizing complexes with NH,NR-stabilized carbene ligands. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 1210–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bonati, F.; Burini, A.; Pietroni, B.R.; Bovio, B. Reactions of C-imidazolyllithium derivatives with Group Ib compounds: Tris[μ-(1-alkylimidazolato-N3,C2)]tri-gold(I) and -silver(I). Crystal structure of bis(1-benzylimidazolin-2-yliden)gold(I) chloride. J. Organomet. Chem. 1989, 375, 147–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Raubenheimer, H.G.; Lindeque, L.; Cronje, S. Synthesis and characterization of neutral and cationic diamino carbene complexes of gold(I). J. Organomet. Chem. 1996, 511, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Huertos, M.A.; Pérez, J.; Riera, L.; Menéndez-Velázquez, A. From N-alkylimidazole ligands at a rhenium center: Ring opening or formation of NHC complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 13530–13531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Sundberg, R.J.; Bryan, R.F.; Taylor, I.F.; Taube, H. Nitrogen-Bound and Carbon-Bound Imidazole Complexes of Ruthenium Ammines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 381–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hahn, F.E.; Naziruddin, A.R.; Hepp, A.; Pape, T. Synthesis, characterization, and H-bonding abilities of ruthenium(II) complexes bearing bidentate NR,NH-carbene/phosphine ligands. Organometallics 2010, 29, 5283–5288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Eguillor, B.; Esteruelas, M.A.; García-Raboso, J.; Oliván, M.; Oñate, E.; Pastor, I.M.; Peñafiel, I.; Yus, M. Osmium NHC complexes from alcohol-functionalized imidazoles and imidazolium salts. Organometallics 2011, 30, 1658–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Araki, K.; Kuwata, S.; Ikariya, T. Isolation and interconversion of protic N-heterocyclic carbene and imidazolyl complexes: Application to catalytic dehydrative condensation of N-(2-Pyridyl)benzimidazole and allyl alcohol. Organometallics 2008, 27, 2176–2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Miranda-Soto, V.; Grotjahn, D.B.; Cooksy, A.L.; Golen, J.A.; Moore, C.E.; Rheingold, A.L. A Labile and Catalytically Active Imidazol-2-yl Fragment System. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 631–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Miranda-Soto, V.; Grotjahn, D.B.; DiPasquale, A.G.; Rheingold, A.L. Imidazol-2-yl Complexes of Cp*Ir as Bifunctional Ambident Reactants. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 13200–13201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Naziruddin, A.R.; Hepp, A.; Pape, T.; Hahn, F.E. Synthesis of Rhodium(I) Complexes Bearing Bidentate NH,NR-NHC/Phosphine Ligands. Organometallics 2011, 30, 5859–5866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Flowers, S.E.; Cossairt, B.M. Mono- and Dimetalation of a Tridentate Bisimidazole-Phosphine Ligand. Organometallics 2014, 33, 4341–4344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. He, F.; Braunstein, P.; Wesolek, M.; Danopoulos, A.A. Imine-functionalised protic NHC complexes of Ir: Direct formation by C–H activation. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 2814–2817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Cepa, S.; Schulte To Brinke, C.; Roelfes, F.; Hahn, F.E. Hydrogen Activation by an Iridium(III) Complex Bearing a Bidentate Protic NH,NR-NHC^Phosphine Ligand. Organometallics 2015, 34, 5454–5460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wiedemann, S.H.; Lewis, J.C.; Ellman, J.A.; Bergman, R.G. Experimental and Computational Studies on the Mechanism of N-Heterocycle C−H Activation by Rh(I). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2452–2462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hawkes, K.J.; Cavell, K.J.; Yates, B.F. Rhodium-Catalyzed C−C Coupling Reactions: Mechanistic Considerations. Organometallics 2008, 27, 4758–4771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lewis, J.C.; Wu, J.Y.; Bergman, R.G.; Ellman, J.A. Microwave-Promoted Rhodium-Catalyzed Arylation of Heterocycles through C−H Bond Activation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1589–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Johnson, L.K.; Angelici, R.J. Synthesis of Aminooxycarbene Complexes of Iron with N-Alkyl, -Allyl, and -Carbamoyl Groups. Inorg. Chem. 1987, 26, 973–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hahn, F.E.; Langenhahn, V.; Lügger, T.; Pape, T.; Le Van, D. Template Synthesis of a Coordinated Tetracarbene Ligand with Crown Ether Topology. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3759–3763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kaufhold, O.; Stasch, A.; Edwards, P.G.; Hahn, F.E. Template Controlled Synthesis of a Coordinated [11]ane- P2CNHC Macrocycle. Chem. Commun 2007, 1822–1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Kaufhold, O.; Stasch, A.; Pape, T.; Hepp, A.; Edwards, P.G.; Newman, P.D.; Hahn, F.E. Metal Template Controlled Formation of [11]ane- P2CNHC Macrocycles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 306–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Blase, V.; Pape, T.; Hahn, F.E. Template Synthesis of a Macrocycle with a Mixed NHC/phosphine Donor Set. J. Organomet. Chem. 2011, 696, 3337–3342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Flores-Figueroa, A.; Kaufhold, O.; Hepp, A.; Fröhlich, R.; Hahn, F.E. Synthesis of a Ruthenium(II) Complex Containing an [11]ane-P2CNHC (NHC = Imidazolidin-2-ylidene) Macrocycle. Organometallics 2009, 28, 6362–6369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Flores-Figueroa, A.; Pape, T.; Weigand, J.J.; Hahn, F.E. Template-Controlled Formation of an [11]ane- P2CNHC Macrocyclic Ligand at an Iron(II) Template. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 2907–2910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Boche, G.; Hilf, C.; Harms, K.; Marsch, M.; Lohrenz, J.C.W. Crystal Structure of the Dimeric(4-tert-Butylthiazolato)(glyme)lithium: Carbene Character of a Formyl Anion Equivalent. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1995, 34, 487–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kösterke, T.; Kösters, J.; Würthwein, E.U.; Mück-Lichtenfeld, C.; Schulte To Brinke, C.; Lahoz, F.; Hahn, F.E. Synthesis of complexes containing an anionic NHC ligand with an unsubstituted ring-nitrogen atom. Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 14594–14598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Arduengo, A.J.; Dixon, D.A.; Harlow, R.L.; Dias, H.V.R.; Booster, W.T.; Koetzle, T.F. Electron Distribution in a Stable Carbene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 6812–6822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Cernochvá, J.; Necas, M.; Kuritka, I.; Vicha, R. 1-(1-Adamantylmethyl)-1H-benzimidazole. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. E 2011, E67, 2906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Hille, U.E.; Zimmer, C.; Vock, C.A.; Hartmann, R.W. First Selective CPB11B1 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Cortisol-Dependent Diseases. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 2–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Huertos, M.A.; Pérez, J.; Riera, L.; Díaz, J.; López, R. Effect of the nature of the substituent in N-alkylimidazole ligands on the outcome of deprotonation: Ring opening versus the formation of N-heterocyclic carbene complexes. Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 8495–8507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Ruiz, J.; Perandones, B.F. Base-Promoted Tautomerization of Imidazole Ligand to NHC & Subsequent Transmetalation Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 9298–9299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Ruiz, J.; Berros, Á.; Perandones, B.F.; Vivanco, M. NHC–manganese(I) complexes as carbene transfer agents. Dalton Trans. 2009, 6999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Hering, F.; Radius, U. From NHC to Imidazolyl Ligand: Synthesis of Platinum and Palladium Complexes d10-[M(NHC)2] (M = Pd, Pt) of the NHC 1,3-Diisopropylimidazolin-2-ylidene. Organometallics 2015, 34, 3236–3245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Fortman, G.C.; Scott, N.M.; Linden, A.; Stevens, E.D.; Dorta, R.; Nolan, S.P. Unusual reactivities of N-heterocyclic carbenes upon coordination to the platinum(II)–dimethyl moiety. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 1050–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Schettini, M.F.; Wu, G.; Hayton, T.W. Synthesis and reactivity of a uranyl-imidazolyl complex. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 1484–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ariafard, A.; Zarkoob, F.; Batebi, H.; Stranger, R.; Yates, B.F. DFT studies on the carboxylation of the C-H bond of heteroarenes by copper(I) complexes. Organometallics 2011, 30, 6218–6224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zhang, L.; Cheng, J.; Ohishi, T.; Hou, Z. Copper-catalyzed direct carboxylation of C-H bonds with carbon dioxide. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 8670–8673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Boogaerts, I.I.F.; Fortman, G.C.; Furst, M.R.L.; Cazin, C.S.J.; Nolan, S.P. Carboxylation of N–H/C–H bonds using N-heterocyclic carbene copper(I) complexes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 8674–8677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Boogaerts, I.I.F.; Nolan, S.P. Carboxylation of C–H bonds using N-heterocyclic carbene gold(I) complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 8858–8859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Zhang, X.; Geng, Z.; Wang, Y.; Hou, X.; Wang, D. Theoretical studies on the mechanism of oxazole with CO2 catalyzed by gold(I) complexes. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2012, 363–364, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Yu, D.; Zhang, Y. Copper- and copper–N-heterocyclic carbene-catalyzed C–H activating carboxylation of terminal alkynes with CO2 at ambient conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 20184–20189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Stephan, D.W.; Erker, G. Frustrated Lewis Pair Chemistry: Development and Perspectives. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 6400–6441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Catalysts 08 00620 g001 550
Figure 1. Substitution patterns of N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) nitrogen atoms delineating: (A) “classical” NR,NR NHCs, (B) protic NH,NR or NH,NH NHCs, (C) and anionic NM,NR or naked N,NR NHCs.
Figure 1. Substitution patterns of N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) nitrogen atoms delineating: (A) “classical” NR,NR NHCs, (B) protic NH,NR or NH,NH NHCs, (C) and anionic NM,NR or naked N,NR NHCs.
Catalysts 08 00620 g001
Catalysts 08 00620 g002 550
Figure 2. (A) Anionic Classical Mixed Normal/Abnormal N-Heterocyclic Carbenes (NHCs). (B) Anionic Naked N,NR NHCs.
Figure 2. (A) Anionic Classical Mixed Normal/Abnormal N-Heterocyclic Carbenes (NHCs). (B) Anionic Naked N,NR NHCs.
Catalysts 08 00620 g002
Catalysts 08 00620 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Tautomeric forms of imidazole-based protic metal NHC complexes.
Scheme 1. Tautomeric forms of imidazole-based protic metal NHC complexes.
Catalysts 08 00620 sch001
Catalysts 08 00620 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Synthetic strategies for the preparation of protic NHC complexes: (A) metal-templated cyclization of isocyanides and nitrogen-containing nucleophiles; (B) metal-templated cyclisation of isocyanides with bromoethylamine or aziridine; (C) intramolecular metal isocyanide 1,2-addition; (D) metalation of pre-formed N-protected N-heterocycle followed by deprotection; (E) transmetalation of C2-lithiated N-heterocycle followed by N-protonation; (F) acid- or base-induced carbene/imidazole tautomerization from N-metalated imidazole metal complexes.
Scheme 2. Synthetic strategies for the preparation of protic NHC complexes: (A) metal-templated cyclization of isocyanides and nitrogen-containing nucleophiles; (B) metal-templated cyclisation of isocyanides with bromoethylamine or aziridine; (C) intramolecular metal isocyanide 1,2-addition; (D) metalation of pre-formed N-protected N-heterocycle followed by deprotection; (E) transmetalation of C2-lithiated N-heterocycle followed by N-protonation; (F) acid- or base-induced carbene/imidazole tautomerization from N-metalated imidazole metal complexes.
Catalysts 08 00620 sch002
Catalysts 08 00620 sch003 550
Scheme 3. Synthesis of a protic NHC complex by tautomerization of neutral imidazole-based ligands, facilitated by a pendant (A) oxygen donor [58] and (B) phosphine donor [57].
Scheme 3. Synthesis of a protic NHC complex by tautomerization of neutral imidazole-based ligands, facilitated by a pendant (A) oxygen donor [58] and (B) phosphine donor [57].
Catalysts 08 00620 sch003
Catalysts 08 00620 sch004 550
Scheme 4. Synthesis of a protic NHC complex by tautomerization of neutral imidazole ligands, facilitated by a pendant nitrogen donor: ruthenium-catalyzed dehydrative C–C coupling of a benzimidazole and allyl alcohol [59].
Scheme 4. Synthesis of a protic NHC complex by tautomerization of neutral imidazole ligands, facilitated by a pendant nitrogen donor: ruthenium-catalyzed dehydrative C–C coupling of a benzimidazole and allyl alcohol [59].
Catalysts 08 00620 sch004
Catalysts 08 00620 sch005 550
Scheme 5. Deprotonation-induced N-functionalization of an iron(II)-NHC complex.
Scheme 5. Deprotonation-induced N-functionalization of an iron(II)-NHC complex.
Catalysts 08 00620 sch005
Catalysts 08 00620 g003 550
Figure 3. Lithiated 4-tert-butylthiazole 14 featuring C/N metalation.
Figure 3. Lithiated 4-tert-butylthiazole 14 featuring C/N metalation.
Catalysts 08 00620 g003
Catalysts 08 00620 sch006 550
Scheme 6. Reaction products obtained from the oxidative addition of [Pt(PPh3)4] to 2-chloro-N-methylbenzimidazole (15) in the presence and absence of a proton source.
Scheme 6. Reaction products obtained from the oxidative addition of [Pt(PPh3)4] to 2-chloro-N-methylbenzimidazole (15) in the presence and absence of a proton source.
Catalysts 08 00620 sch006
Catalysts 08 00620 g004 550
Figure 4. Possible carbenic (22a) and carbanionic (22b) resonance contributors for the N,NR ligand moiety in complex 17.
Figure 4. Possible carbenic (22a) and carbanionic (22b) resonance contributors for the N,NR ligand moiety in complex 17.
Catalysts 08 00620 g004
Catalysts 08 00620 sch007 550
Scheme 7. (A) Anionic N,NR NHC complex formation from the deprotonation of a protic NHC complex. (B) Reduction of the iridium(III) center of a N,NR NHC complex to give a NM,NR complex, which can undergo alkylation on the metal.
Scheme 7. (A) Anionic N,NR NHC complex formation from the deprotonation of a protic NHC complex. (B) Reduction of the iridium(III) center of a N,NR NHC complex to give a NM,NR complex, which can undergo alkylation on the metal.
Catalysts 08 00620 sch007
Catalysts 08 00620 sch008 550
Scheme 8. Elimination of the N-coordinated metal in a heterobimetallic NM,NR NHC complex that facilitates ligand exchange at the metal center.
Scheme 8. Elimination of the N-coordinated metal in a heterobimetallic NM,NR NHC complex that facilitates ligand exchange at the metal center.
Catalysts 08 00620 sch008
Catalysts 08 00620 sch009 550
Scheme 9. Transmetalation at the anionic nitrogen site in NM,NR NHC complexes.
Scheme 9. Transmetalation at the anionic nitrogen site in NM,NR NHC complexes.
Catalysts 08 00620 sch009
Catalysts 08 00620 sch010 550
Scheme 10. Formation of a N,NR NHC complex 38 from protic NHC complexes 37 and 39 via the dehydrative conversion of a nitrite ion into a nitrosyl ligand under neutral conditions or base-assisted deprotonation.
Scheme 10. Formation of a N,NR NHC complex 38 from protic NHC complexes 37 and 39 via the dehydrative conversion of a nitrite ion into a nitrosyl ligand under neutral conditions or base-assisted deprotonation.
Catalysts 08 00620 sch010
Catalysts 08 00620 sch011 550
Scheme 11. Substituent-dependent formation of N(H),NR NHC complex 42 or ring-opening at N-alkylimidazole rhenium (I) complex 40.
Scheme 11. Substituent-dependent formation of N(H),NR NHC complex 42 or ring-opening at N-alkylimidazole rhenium (I) complex 40.
Catalysts 08 00620 sch011
Catalysts 08 00620 sch012 550
Scheme 12. Auration of N,NR rhenium(I) complex 41 involving tautomerization of the imidazolyl ligand.
Scheme 12. Auration of N,NR rhenium(I) complex 41 involving tautomerization of the imidazolyl ligand.
Catalysts 08 00620 sch012
Catalysts 08 00620 sch013 550
Scheme 13. Carbene transfer from a manganese(I) complex 49 to gold(I) complex 51 via heterobimetallic intermediate 50.
Scheme 13. Carbene transfer from a manganese(I) complex 49 to gold(I) complex 51 via heterobimetallic intermediate 50.
Catalysts 08 00620 sch013
Catalysts 08 00620 sch014 550
Scheme 14. Platinum-mediated C–N bond cleavage affording N,NR complex 53.
Scheme 14. Platinum-mediated C–N bond cleavage affording N,NR complex 53.
Catalysts 08 00620 sch014
Catalysts 08 00620 sch015 550
Scheme 15. Metalation and tautomerization of uranyl imidazolyl complex 55.
Scheme 15. Metalation and tautomerization of uranyl imidazolyl complex 55.
Catalysts 08 00620 sch015
Catalysts 08 00620 sch016 550
Scheme 16. Direct copper(I)-catalyzed carboxylation of aromatic C–H bonds within heterocycles 57.
Scheme 16. Direct copper(I)-catalyzed carboxylation of aromatic C–H bonds within heterocycles 57.
Catalysts 08 00620 sch016
Catalysts 08 00620 sch017 550
Scheme 17. Proposed mechanism for the copper(I)-catalyzed direct carboxylation of aromatic N-heterocycles 57.
Scheme 17. Proposed mechanism for the copper(I)-catalyzed direct carboxylation of aromatic N-heterocycles 57.
Catalysts 08 00620 sch017
Catalysts 08 00620 g005 550
Figure 5. (A) Computed energy profiles for two possible pathways for the protonolysis of [Cu(IPr)(OH)] by benzoxazole determined via density functional theory (DFT). (B) Computed energy profiles for two possible CO2 activation pathways from a copper benzoxazolyl complex determined via DFT. The relative free energies are given in kcal/mol.
Figure 5. (A) Computed energy profiles for two possible pathways for the protonolysis of [Cu(IPr)(OH)] by benzoxazole determined via density functional theory (DFT). (B) Computed energy profiles for two possible CO2 activation pathways from a copper benzoxazolyl complex determined via DFT. The relative free energies are given in kcal/mol.
Catalysts 08 00620 g005
Catalysts 08 00620 g006 550
Figure 6. Cooperative CO2 insertion into the C–H bond of terminal alkynes by copper(I) and a free carbene on a poly-NHC scaffold 62.
Figure 6. Cooperative CO2 insertion into the C–H bond of terminal alkynes by copper(I) and a free carbene on a poly-NHC scaffold 62.
Catalysts 08 00620 g006
Table
Table 1. Comparisons of fundamental structural and spectroscopic data for NH,NR (20), N,NR, (17), and NR,NR NHC (18) complexes relative to reference benzimidazoles.
Table 1. Comparisons of fundamental structural and spectroscopic data for NH,NR (20), N,NR, (17), and NR,NR NHC (18) complexes relative to reference benzimidazoles.
Parameter Catalysts 08 00620 i001 Catalysts 08 00620 i00220; N3 = Protonated [77]17; N3 = Naked18; N3 = Alkylated
N1–C2–N3 (°)114.83(11) [79]114.41(17)107.1(4)111.37(17)106.7(2)
C2–N1 (Å); “A”1.3629(14) [79]1.345(2)1.350(6)1.389(2)1.351(3)
C2–N3 (Å); “B”1.3096(14) [79]1.312(2)1.349(6)1.319(3)1.364(3)
ΔA–B (Å)0.0530.0330.0010.0700.013
C2–Pt (Å)--1.972(4)1.987(2)1.973(2)
13C NMR δC2 (ppm)144.3 (CDCl3) [80]141.9 (d6-DMSO)157.8 (CD2Cl2)149.4 (CD2Cl2)163.3 (CD2Cl2)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Leow, M.Y.; Ho, C.C.; Gardiner, M.G.; Bissember, A.C. Non-Classical Anionic Naked N-Heterocyclic Carbenes: Fundamental Properties and Emerging Applications in Synthesis and Catalysis. Catalysts 2018, 8, 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8120620

AMA Style

Leow MY, Ho CC, Gardiner MG, Bissember AC. Non-Classical Anionic Naked N-Heterocyclic Carbenes: Fundamental Properties and Emerging Applications in Synthesis and Catalysis. Catalysts. 2018; 8(12):620. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8120620

Chicago/Turabian Style

Leow, Mei Yi, Curtis C. Ho, Michael G. Gardiner, and Alex C. Bissember. 2018. "Non-Classical Anionic Naked N-Heterocyclic Carbenes: Fundamental Properties and Emerging Applications in Synthesis and Catalysis" Catalysts 8, no. 12: 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8120620

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop