Next Article in Journal
Pd4S/SiO2: A Sulfur-Tolerant Palladium Catalyst for Catalytic Complete Oxidation of Methane
Previous Article in Journal
Insights into the Morphological Effect of Co3O4 Crystallite on Catalytic Oxidation of Vinyl Chloride
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

H3PW12O40/SBA-15 for the Solventless Synthesis of 3-Substituted Indoles

1
Department of Chemistry, School of Sciences, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar 96179-76487, Iran
2
Applied Chemistry and Environmental Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
3
European Bioenergy Research Institute, Aston University, Aston Triangle B4 7ET, UK
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2019, 9(5), 409; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9050409
Submission received: 27 March 2019 / Revised: 15 April 2019 / Accepted: 15 April 2019 / Published: 30 April 2019

Abstract

:
A family of silica-supported H3PW12O40 (HPW) solid acid catalysts was prepared by wet impregnation of mesoporous SBA-15 and investigated for the solventless synthesis of 3-substituted indoles under mild conditions. Mesoporous SBA-15 facilitated a high dispersion of immobilised H3PW12O40, significantly improving the catalytic efficiency of the heteropolyacid for the desired multi-component transformation. The yield of 3-substituted indoles strongly correlated with HPW loading (which spanned 3.2–51.6 wt %) and corresponding acid strength; the 51.6 wt % HPW/SBA-15 delivered 81% yield of 2-[(1H-indol-3-yl)(phenyl)methyl]malononitrile, approximately five times greater than that of the unsupported HPW, and exhibited a broad substrate scope for aromatic aldehydes.

1. Introduction

Porous solids find widespread application in heterogeneous catalysis as either active components or high-area support architectures, wherein pore dimensions and network connectivity control the attendant internal surface area and accessibility [1]. Microporous and mesoporous solid acids, such as zeolites, resins, and sulfonated carbons and silicas, facilitate dehydration, hydrolysis, condensation, and isomerization reactions pivotal to petroleum refining and fine and specialty chemical manufacturing [2]. However, the microporous nature and poor hydrothermal stability of the former render them unsuitable for transformation involving bulky substrates [3]. Among mesoporous silicas, the relatively large and tunable pore dimensions, thick walls, and high surface area of SBA-15 have rendered it an attractive support for sterically demanding organic transformations including biodiesel synthesis [4] and photodegradation of wastewater pollutants [5]. A range of catalytic functions have been incorporated into SBA-15 for acid-catalysed reactions including sulfated zirconia for ethyl levulinate production [6] and heteropolyacids for diesel desulfurization and fine chemicals production [7,8,9].
The 3-substituted indoles are important chemical intermediates in pharmaceuticals and contribute to the preparation of various pharmacochemical analogues of synthetic Ergine, Gramine and Sumatriptan [10,11]. Only a handful of catalyst systems, including Zn(salphen) [12], N,N´-dioxide Zn(II) [13], copper(II) sulfonato Salen [14] complexes and tetrabutylammonium fluoride [15], are reported for the synthesis of 3-substituted indoles. Herein, we demonstrate the application of H3PW12O40-modified SBA-15 (HPW/SBA-15) as an effective solid acid catalyst for the solventless synthesis of 3-substituted indoles by the condensation of some aromatic aldehydes with indole and malononitrile under mild conditions. The high HPW dispersion achieved over the mesoporous silica offers a five-fold enhancement in the resulting yield of condensation products.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Physicochemical Properties of HPW/SBA-15

Successful immobilization of HPW over SBA-15 has been previously demonstrated by a range of bulk and surface characterization techniques, including N2 porosimetry, elemental analysis, X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and ammonia and propylamine chemisorption [16]. The heteropolyacid content in the resulting family of HPW/SBA-15 materials can be readily varied between 4.3 and 51.6 wt % (3.2–38.2 wt % W, Table 1). Low loadings resulted in isolated Keggin clusters (Figure S1), which aggregated at loadings >9 wt % HPW to form crystalline secondary structures around 10 nm diameter. This coincided with a small decrease in the Brunauer Emmer-Teller (BET) surface area and a more significant fall in the pore volume (Figure S2) likely due to the blockage of micropores within the silica walls. HRTEM confirmed that Keggin units were uniformly dispersed throughout the ordered mesopore channels (Figure S3), and thermogravimetric analysis that these were thermally stable up to 380 °C [16], for all loadings. The resulting HPW/SBA-15 materials exhibited high acid densities.

2.2. Catalytic Performance

HPW/SBA-15 samples displayed indole yields between 47 and 81%, which were strongly dependent on HPW loading. The synthesis of 2-[(1H-indol-3-yl)(phenyl)methyl]malononitrile from benzaldehyde, indole, and malononitrile (Scheme 1) was first monitored in the absence of any catalyst, resulting in only 9% of the desired product after 20 min (Table 2). In contrast, 44% yield was obtained in the presence of 5 mg pure HPW for the same reaction time and conditions. Immobilizing the heteropolyacid onto the surface of SBA-15 increased the dispersion of the catalytically active Brønsted acid sites throughout the silica pore network, resulting in increased specific (mass-normalised) activity. It is noteworthy that even the lowest loaded 4.3 wt % HPW/SBA-15 outperformed the pure HPW, presumably due to formation of large aggregates of HPW in the reaction mixture which led to a decrease in accessible acid sites, reflecting the importance of the so-called ‘pseudo-liquid phase’ catalysis for heteropolyacids in reactions involving low-polarity substrates. The substituted indole yield showed a strong correlation with the ammonia desorption temperature (Figure 1 and Figure S4), which in turn was directly proportional to the HPW loading and concomitant acid strength [16]; acidity increased with HPW loading due to the nucleation of isolated Keggin clusters (which lacked acid sites associated with water held within the secondary heteropolyacid structure) and the formation of two-dimensional HPW aggregates linked by crystalline water [17]. This structure–activity relation indicated that either the acid catalysed aldehyde activation or intramolecular cyclisation steps were rate-limiting for indole formation. In contrast, indole yield did not correlate with catalyst textural properties.
The effectiveness of 51.6 wt % HPW/SBA-15 towards the synthesis of different 3-substituted indoles was evaluated for aromatic aldehydes possessing electron withdrawing and/or donating substituents. High yields for most of the aromatic aldehydes were obtained, as demonstrated in Table 3. However, electron-withdrawing groups afforded slightly better yields than electron-donating substituents [18,19].
Hot-filtration tests evidenced negligible leaching of HPW from the surface of SBA-15. A reaction was performed with benzaldehyde at 60 °C for 10 min in the presence of 51.6 wt % HPW/SBA-15, at which point the product yield reached 52%. Ethanol (1 mL) was then added to the reaction mixture, and the heterogeneous catalyst was immediately removed by filtration. Thereafter, the remaining filtrate was monitored for additional 10 min at the same temperature, during which no significant increase in the product yield (<5%) was observed, confirming that there was no homogeneous contribution to the condensation reaction. The reproducibility and recyclability of 51.6 wt % HPW/SBA-15 for the preparation of 2-[(1H-indol-3-yl)(phenyl)methyl]malononitrile were also assessed. Triplicate reactions under identical conditions evidenced that product yields were reproducible within ±2% error. Catalyst reuse was undertaken by filtering the 51.6 wt % HPW/SBA-15 catalyst after the first run, washing with cold ethanol to remove residual organic species, drying at 90 °C for 4 h, and finally adding a fresh solution of the reactants. Good catalyst stability was observed, with only a ~15% decrease in product yield over five consecutive reactions (Figure S5). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) of the post-reaction catalyst after five consecutive runs confirmed that the parent Keggin structure was preserved (Figure S6).
A plausible reaction pathway is proposed in Figure S7, in which a Knoevenagel condensation of the aldehyde carbonyl group with malononitrile forms intermediate (I) via nucleophilic addition. The indole then reacts with the olefinated intermediate (I) through a Michael addition to afford intermediate (II), which subsequently rearranges to the 3-substituted indole. The heteropolyacid likely protonates the carbonyl group of aromatic aldehydes, increasing its Lewis acidity. Electron-donating substituents on the phenyl ring of the aldehyde therefore deactivate it towards the nucleophilic attack of malononitrile, whereas electron-withdrawing groups activate the aldehyde [19,20].

3. Experimental

3.1. Catalyst Synthesis

H3PW12O40 was dispersed over mesoporous SBA-15 (900 m2·g−1) via wet impregnation to achieve W loadings spanning 4.3–38.2 wt %, as described previously [16]. In brief, the required amount of HPW (Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK ≥ 99.9%) was dissolved in 30 mL methanol (Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, UK, HPLC grade) at room temperature. Thereafter, 1 g of the SBA-15 was added to the methanol solution and stirred overnight. The solvent was subsequently evaporated under vacuum at ambient temperature.

3.2. Catalyst Characterization and Synthesis of 2-[(1H-Indol-3-yl)(Aryl)methyl]Malononitriles

The catalysts used in this study were characterised in a previous publication [16]. Temperature programmed desorption (TPD) of ammonia-saturated samples was performed using a Quantachrome ChemBET3000 system (Quantachrome, Hook, UK) with a MKS Minilab MS detector (MKS, Crewe, UK). Samples (25–50 mg) were placed in a quartz U-shaped chemisorption cell and outgassed at 150 °C under flowing He (150 cm3 min−1) for 4 h prior to ammonia saturation with 10 vol % NH3 in He at 100 °C. Ammonia desorption was subsequently performed under flowing He (150 cm3.min−1) between 100 and 800 °C, employing a ramp rate of 10 °C.min−1.
For the preparation of 2-[(1H-indol-3-yl)(aryl)methyl]malononitriles, HPW/SBA-15 (5 mg) was thoroughly dispersed in a mixture of aldehyde (1.0 mmol), indole (1.0 mmol) and malononitrile (1.0 mmol), and the resulting heterogeneous mixture was heated to 60 °C. Indole (solid, m.p. 52–53 °C), aldehyde (liquid and/or solid), malononitrile (freshly crystallised) and the catalyst established a dense liquid ~0.3 mL. Progress of the reactions was screened by TLC (hexane/ethylacetate, 3:2). Finally, hot ethanol (3 mL) was added to the reaction mixture, and the heterogeneous catalyst was quickly filtered under stirring; then, the filtrate was cooled to 5 °C, and the precipitated product was gathered. Further purification of the desired products was achieved via re-crystallization in ethanol. Physical and spectroscopic properties of the pure products were compared with the corresponding known properties of 2-[(1H-indol-3-yl)(aryl)methyl]malononitriles [20,21].

4. Conclusions

A family of systematically related H3PW12O40/SBA-15 catalysts, with HPW loadings ranging from 3.2 to 51.6 wt %, were prepared, characterised and applied for the solventless synthesis of 3-substituted indoles to understand the impact of support and acid strength on activity. Dispersing the HPW over a mesoporous silica support significantly promoted the desired multi-component transformation (yields of 47–81%) with respect to the unsupported parent HPW, which was attributed to improved active sites accessibility for isolated or low-dimensional Keggin nanostructures over SBA-15. The yield of 3-substituted indole was proportional to the acid strength, but poorly correlated with the textural properties. High HPW loadings, which offered the strongest acidity due to the stabilization of crystalline water within the secondary Keggin structure, exhibited good stability over five consecutive reactions and an almost five-fold improvement in the yield of 2-[(1H-indol-3-yl)(phenyl)methyl]malononitrile relative to unsupported HPW under mild conditions.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/9/5/409/s1, Figure S1: Powder XRD patterns for HPW/SBA-15 as a function of W loading, together with a pure HPW reference; Figure S2: Variation of (a) surface areas of HPW/SBA-15 and (b) mesopore diameter and mesopore volume of HPW/SBA-15 as a function of bulk W loading; Figure S3: HRTEM dark-field images of 3.2 wt % HPW/SBA-15 (a) and 51.6 wt % HPW/SBA-15 (b); Figure S4: NH3 TPD spectra for HPW/SBA-15 as a function of W loading. Figure S5: Yield as a function of reusability for 51.6 wt % HPW/SBA-15; Figure S6: FT-IR spectra of 51.6 wt % HPW/SBA-15 after five consecutive reactions (a), fresh catalyst (b) post-reaction; Figure S7. Proposed reaction pathway for the condensation of aldehyde, indole and malononitrile; Table S1: Acid site densities of silica-supported HPW.

Author Contributions

R.T. and A.F.L. planned and designed the experiments. L.F. performed the catalyst synthesis and the characterization of catalysts. R.T. and S.R. performed the catalytic activity tests. R.T. wrote the manuscript. R.T. and A.F.L supervised the project and edited the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was supported by the Iran National Science Foundation (INSF), Aston and Hakim Sabzevari Universities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Taguchi, A.; Schüth, F. Ordered mesoporous materials in catalysis. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2005, 77, 1–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Corma, A. Inorganic solid acids and their use in acid-catalyzed hydrocarbon reactions. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 559–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rinaldi, R.; Schüth, F. Design of solid catalysts for the conversion of biomass. Energy Environ. Sci. 2009, 2, 610–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dacquin, J.-P.; Pirez, C.; Lee, A.F.; Wilson, K. Pore-expanded SBA-15 sulfonic acid silicas for biodiesel synthesis. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 212–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Tayebee, R.; Mohammadzadeh Kakhki, R.; Audebert, P.; Amini, M.M.; Salehi, M.; Mahdizadeh Ghohe, N.; Karimipour, G.R. A robust UV–visible light-driven SBA-15-PS/phthalhydrazide nanohybrid material with enhanced photocatalytic activity in the photodegradation of methyl orange. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2018, 32, e4391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Morales, G.; Paniagua, M.; Iglesias, J.; Hernández, B.; Wilson, K.; Lee, A.F.; Brown, D.R.; Granollers, M.; Osatiashtiani, A.; Melero, J.A. Conformal sulfated zirconia monolayer catalysts for the one-pot synthesis of ethyl levulinate from glucose. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 11742–11745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tayebee, R.; Amini, M.M.; Pouyamanesh, S.; Aliakbari, A. A new inorganic–organic hybrid material Al-SBA-15-TPI/H6P2W18O62 catalyzed one-pot, three-component synthesis of 2H-indazolo [2,1-b] phthalazine-triones. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 5888–5897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Julião, D.; Mirante, F.; Ribeiro, S.O.; Gomes, A.C.; Valença, R.; Ribeiro, J.C.; Balula, S.S. Deep oxidative desulfurization of diesel fuels using homogeneous and SBA-15-supported peroxophosphotungstate catalysts. Fuel 2019, 241, 616–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lucas, N.; Gurrala, L.; Athawale, A. Heteropolyacids supported on mesoporous AlSBA-15 as efficient catalysts for esterification of levulinic acid. J. Por. Mater. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Eicher, T.; Hauptmann, S.; Speicher, A. The Chemistry of Heterocycles: Structures, Reactions, Synthesis, and Applications; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2013; pp. 125–147. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ziarani, G.M.; Moradi, R.; Ahmadi, T.; Lashgari, N. Recent advances in the application of indoles in multicomponent reactions. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 12069–12103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Anselmo, D.; Adán, E.C.E.; Belmonte, M.M.; Kleij, A.W. Zn-Mediated synthesis of 3-substituted indoles using a three-component reaction approach. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 4694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, W.; Cai, Y.; Fu, X.; Liu, X.; Lin, L.; Feng, X. Enantioselective one-pot synthesis of 2-amino-4-(indol-3-yl)-4H-chromenes. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 4910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Qu, Y.; Ke, F.; Zhou, L.; Li, Z.; Xiang, H.; Wu, D.; Zhou, X. Synthesis of 3-indole derivatives by copper sulfonato Salen catalyzed three-component reactions in water. Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 3912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Singh, N.; Allam, B.K.; Raghuvanshi, D.S.; Singh, K.N. An efficient tetrabutylammonium fluoride (TBAF)-catalyzed three-component synthesis of 3-substituted indole derivatives under solvent-free conditions. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2013, 355, 1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Frattini, L.; Isaacs, M.A.; Parlett, C.M.; Wilson, K.; Kyriakou, G.; Lee, A.F. Support enhanced α-pinene isomerization over HPW/SBA-15. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 200, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bardin, B.B.; Bordawekar, S.V.; Neurock, M.; Davis, R.J. Acidity of Keggin-Type Heteropolycompounds Evaluated by Catalytic Probe Reactions, Sorption Microcalorimetry, and Density Functional Quantum Chemical Calculations. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 10817–10825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, L.; Huang, M.; Zhu, X.; Wan, Y. Polyethylene glycol (PEG-200)-promoted sustainable one-pot three-component synthesis of 3-indole derivatives in water. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2013, 454, 160–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. He, Y.-H.; Cao, J.-F.; Li, R.; Xiang, Y.; Yang, D.-C.; Guan, Z. L-Proline-catalyzed multicomponent synthesis of 3-indole derivatives. Tetrahedron 2015, 71, 9299–9306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rajesh, U.C.; Kholiya, R.; Thakur, A.; Rawat, D.S. [TBA][Gly] ionic liquid promoted multi-component synthesis of 3-substituted indoles and indolyl-4H-chromenes. Tetrahedron Lett. 2015, 56, 1790–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ghohe, N.M.; Tayebee, R.; Amini, M.M.; Osatiashtiani, A.; Isaacs, M.A.; Lee, A.F. H5PW10V2O40@VOx/SBA-15-NH2 catalyst for the solventless synthesis of 3-substituted indoles. Tetrahedron 2017, 73, 5862–5871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. General formulation for the preparation of 3-substituted indoles.
Scheme 1. General formulation for the preparation of 3-substituted indoles.
Catalysts 09 00409 sch001
Figure 1. Dependence of 2-[(1H-indol-3-yl)(phenyl)methyl]malononitrile yield on HPW acid strength (determined from NH3 TPD).
Figure 1. Dependence of 2-[(1H-indol-3-yl)(phenyl)methyl]malononitrile yield on HPW acid strength (determined from NH3 TPD).
Catalysts 09 00409 g001
Table 1. H3PW12O40 (HPW) content and crystallite size of HPW/SBA-15.
Table 1. H3PW12O40 (HPW) content and crystallite size of HPW/SBA-15.
CatalystBulk W Loading a (wt %)Particle Size b (nm) [16]Acid Loading c
(mmol·g−1)
4.3 wt % HPW/SBA-153.210.50.21
12.1 wt % HPW/SBA-159.010.60.24
26.8 wt % HPW/SBA-1519.910.70.29
51.6 wt % HPW/SBA-1538.210.70.30
a XRF. b HRTEM. c NH3 titration (unsupported H3PW12O40 = 1 mmol·g−1).
Table 2. Three-component solventless condensation of ethyl acetoacetate, urea and benzaldehyde catalysed by different catalysts.
Table 2. Three-component solventless condensation of ethyl acetoacetate, urea and benzaldehyde catalysed by different catalysts.
CatalystProduct Yield (%)
-9
H3PW12O4044(17) a
4.3 wt % HPW/SBA-1547
12.1 wt % HPW/SBA-1556
25.2 wt % HPW/SBA-1567
51.6 wt % HPW/SBA-1581
Reaction conditions: aldehyde (1 mmol), malononitrile (1 mmol) and indole (1 mmol); 60 °C; 20 min; 5 mg catalyst. a 17 % yield was obtained with 2.59 mg of HPW.
Table 3. Three-component solventless condensation of ethyl acetoacetate, urea and aromatic aldehydes catalysed by 51.6 wt % HPW/SBA-15.
Table 3. Three-component solventless condensation of ethyl acetoacetate, urea and aromatic aldehydes catalysed by 51.6 wt % HPW/SBA-15.
EntryAldehydeProductYield (%)m.p. (oC)
1 Catalysts 09 00409 i001 Catalysts 09 00409 i00281201–203
2 Catalysts 09 00409 i003 Catalysts 09 00409 i00489203–204
3 Catalysts 09 00409 i005 Catalysts 09 00409 i00676208–210
4 Catalysts 09 00409 i007 Catalysts 09 00409 i00892203–205
5 Catalysts 09 00409 i009 Catalysts 09 00409 i01067209–211
Reaction conditions as described in Table 2.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tayebee, R.; Lee, A.F.; Frattini, L.; Rostami, S. H3PW12O40/SBA-15 for the Solventless Synthesis of 3-Substituted Indoles. Catalysts 2019, 9, 409. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9050409

AMA Style

Tayebee R, Lee AF, Frattini L, Rostami S. H3PW12O40/SBA-15 for the Solventless Synthesis of 3-Substituted Indoles. Catalysts. 2019; 9(5):409. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9050409

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tayebee, Reza, Adam F. Lee, Lucia Frattini, and Shahrebano Rostami. 2019. "H3PW12O40/SBA-15 for the Solventless Synthesis of 3-Substituted Indoles" Catalysts 9, no. 5: 409. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9050409

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop