Next Article in Journal
Effects of Interfacial Reactions on Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of 3003 Al/T2 Cu and 1035 Al/T2 Cu Brazed Joints
Next Article in Special Issue
Fine Fabrication and Optical Waveguide Characteristics of Hexagonal tris(8-hydroxyquinoline)aluminum(Ⅲ) (Alq3) Crystal
Previous Article in Journal
Structural, Optoelectrical, Linear, and Nonlinear Optical Characterizations of Dip-Synthesized Undoped ZnO and Group III Elements (B, Al, Ga, and In)-Doped ZnO Thin Films
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Investigation for Coating Method of Titanium Dioxide Layer in Perovskite Solar Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparison of the Ionic Liquid Crystal Phase of [C12C1im][BF4] and [C12C1im]Cl by Atomistic MD Simulations

by
Giacomo Saielli
1,2
1
CNR Institute on Membrane Technology, Via Marzolo, 1 – 35131 Padova, Italy
2
Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Padova, Via Marzolo, 1 – 35131 Padova, Italy
Crystals 2020, 10(4), 253; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10040253
Submission received: 12 March 2020 / Revised: 25 March 2020 / Accepted: 26 March 2020 / Published: 27 March 2020

Abstract

We present fully atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulations at 450 K of two ionic liquid crystals in the smectic phase: 1-dodecyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate ([C12C1im][BF4]) and 1-dodecyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ([C12C1im]Cl). The two systems experimentally exhibit different ranges of thermal stability of the ionic smectic phase: The chloride salt has a more stable LC phase, between 270.3 K and 377.6 K, with a range of SmA of more than 107 K. In contrast, the tetrafluoroborate salt has a smectic phase between 299.6 K and 311.6 K, with a range of mesophase of just 12 K. The MD simulations show that the chloride system is stable in the smectic phase for the 5 ns of simulation, while the tetrafluoroborate salt melts into an isotropic ionic liquid, in qualitative agreement with the experiments. Comparison of the electrostatic and van der Waals energetic contributions enables one to rationalize the observed behavior as being due to the large size of the [BF4] anion: a larger size of the anion means a lower charge density, and therefore a weaker electrostatic interaction in the ionic layer.
Keywords: ionic liquid crystals; molecular dynamics simulations; ionic liquids; electrostatic interactions; van der Waals interactions; anion size ionic liquid crystals; molecular dynamics simulations; ionic liquids; electrostatic interactions; van der Waals interactions; anion size

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Saielli, G. Comparison of the Ionic Liquid Crystal Phase of [C12C1im][BF4] and [C12C1im]Cl by Atomistic MD Simulations. Crystals 2020, 10, 253. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10040253

AMA Style

Saielli G. Comparison of the Ionic Liquid Crystal Phase of [C12C1im][BF4] and [C12C1im]Cl by Atomistic MD Simulations. Crystals. 2020; 10(4):253. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10040253

Chicago/Turabian Style

Saielli, Giacomo. 2020. "Comparison of the Ionic Liquid Crystal Phase of [C12C1im][BF4] and [C12C1im]Cl by Atomistic MD Simulations" Crystals 10, no. 4: 253. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10040253

APA Style

Saielli, G. (2020). Comparison of the Ionic Liquid Crystal Phase of [C12C1im][BF4] and [C12C1im]Cl by Atomistic MD Simulations. Crystals, 10(4), 253. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10040253

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop