Next Article in Journal
Non-Reciprocal Supratransmission in Mechanical Lattices with Non-Local Feedback Control Interactions
Next Article in Special Issue
Application of Magnetic and Dielectric Nanofluids for Electromagnetic-Assistance Enhanced Oil Recovery: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Using a Modified Polyamidoamine Fluorescent Dendrimer for Capturing Environment Polluting Metal Ions Zn2+, Cd2+, and Hg2+: Synthesis and Characterizations
Previous Article in Special Issue
One-Step Carbothermal Synthesis of Super Nanoadsorbents for Rapid and Recyclable Wastewater Treatment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fast-Response Liquid Crystal for Spatial Light Modulator and LiDAR Applications

1
College of Optics and Photonics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA
2
DIC Corporation, Chuo City, Tokyo 103-8233, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2021, 11(2), 93; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11020093
Submission received: 11 January 2021 / Revised: 21 January 2021 / Accepted: 22 January 2021 / Published: 22 January 2021

Abstract

:
We report a new nematic mixture for liquid-crystal-on-silicon spatial light modulator (SLM) and light detection and ranging (LiDAR) applications. The mixture exhibits a relatively high birefringence (Δn), moderate dielectric anisotropy (Δɛ), low viscosity, and reasonably good photostability. To achieve 2π phase change at 5 V, the response time (on + off) is 2.5 ms at 40 °C with λ = 633 nm, and 5.9 ms with λ = 905 nm. After exposure by a blue laser (λ = 465 nm) with a total dosage up to 20 MJ/cm2, this mixture shows no sign of photodegradation. Widespread applications of this material for high brightness SLMs, LiDAR, near-eye displays, and head-up displays are foreseeable.

1. Introduction

Liquid crystals (LCs) have been widely used in display devices [1,2], such as smartphones, computers, TVs, emergent augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) [3], and vehicle displays [4], to name a few. For these amplitude modulations, to achieve high contrast ratio, the pixelated liquid crystal display (LCD) panel is sandwiched between two crossed polarizers, and each pixel is addressed by a thin-film transistor independently. For example, an 8K full-color LCD (7680 × 4320 × 3) consists of 99.532 million sub-pixels. In addition to intensity modulators, LC can also work as a phase-only spatial light modulator (SLM). Under such a circumstance, no polarizer is needed if the incident laser is already linearly polarized. Both transmission-type [5] and reflection-type SLMs [6] have been developed. The former has a simpler optical system, but its shortcomings are: (1) limited aperture ratio, especially as the pixel density increases, and (2) slower response time. On the reflection-type SLM, liquid-crystal-on-silicon (LCoS) [6,7,8] is a well-developed technology because of its high-resolution density, low operation voltage, and fast response time. The LCoS based SLMs have also found many useful applications, such as multi-focus AR display [9,10] and head-up display [4] to overcome the vergence-accommodation conflict issue, beam shaping for lithography [11], adaptive optics for wavefront correction [12], wavelength selective switch for telecommunications [13], and non-mechanical beam steering for light detection and ranging (LiDAR) for advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) and future self-driving vehicles [14]. Recently, a liquid crystal integrated metasurface was applied to steer a laser beam for LiDAR [15]. For this kind of SLM, response time is a key factor. To achieve the desired 240 Hz frame rate, the 2π phase-change response time should be less than 4 ms. However, several demonstrated prototypes can only operate at 60 Hz, including the head mounted displays from Microsoft [16] and Oculus [17]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop fast-response LC materials with low operation voltage (V2π = 5 Vrms) for LCoS SLMs.
In a reflective LCoS SLM, the phase change δ = 2[2πdΔn/λ], here the first factor 2 represents the double pass of the incident beam, d is the LC layer thickness (i.e., cell gap), Δn is the LC birefringence, and λ is the wavelength. Reducing the cell gap is a straightforward way to achieve fast response time, which is proportional to d2. Increasing the operating temperature helps greatly to lower the rotational viscosity, which in turn reducing the response time. Two thermal effects from the driving circuits of CMOS (complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor) backplane and the high-power light source contribute to increasing the operating temperature of an LCoS to 40–50 °C [18]. As the temperature increases, both birefringence and viscoelastic constant decrease but at different rates [19]. The decreased birefringence demands either a thicker cell gap or a higher birefringence LC at the room temperature, while lower viscoelastic constant helps to achieve faster response time. In the meantime, extending the SLM lifetime is also essential, which is jointly determined by the photostability of the employed alignment layer (organic polyimide or inorganic SiOx) and LC material [20,21]. The light source commonly used in an LCoS projector is a high-power arc lamp, RGB LEDs (red, green, and blue light-emitting diodes), or lasers. Among the RGB light sources, the high energy blue photons are most harmful and may cause gradual device degradation, depending on the LC material employed. The inorganic SiOx alignment layer [22] has been proven to withstand long-term UV or blue light exposure [23], but high Δn LC materials with excellent photostability in the blue spectral region still have not been investigated thoroughly.
In this paper, we present a new LC mixture formulated by DIC, designated as A4907, for LCoS SLM and LiDAR applications. Its response time is ~2.5 ms at λ = 633 nm and 40 °C and ~5.9 ms at λ = 905 nm. Such a fast response time results from the relatively high birefringence and low viscoelastic constant of A4907. Moreover, this mixture exhibits a reasonably good photostability at λ = 465 nm for a dosage up to 20 MJ/cm2.

2. Material Characterizations

The physical properties of A4907 are listed in Table 1. For comparison, we also show the physical properties of Merck TL-216 and UCF-216 [24]. The melting temperature (Tm) and clearing temperature (Tc) were measured by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC, TA Instruments Q100, Lukens Drive, New Castle, DE 19720). All these three materials have a wide nematic range that satisfies the requirement for most LCoS applications. The dielectric constants were measured with a multifrequency LCR meter, HP-4274 (Santa Rosa, CA, United States). The viscoelastic constant γ1/K11 of each mixture was measured from the free relaxation response time of a test cell [25]. From Table 1, we can see that A4907 has higher birefringence and lower viscoelastic constant than the other two mixtures, which implies it can achieve a faster response time.

2.1. Birefringence

To measure Δn, the LC mixture was filled into a homogeneous cell, whose cell gap d = 5.34 µm, and the pretilt angle of the rubbed polyimide alignment layers is about 3°. This cell was sandwiched between two crossed polarizers and activated with a 1 kHz square-wave AC voltage. A Linkam heating stage was applied to control the sample temperature through a temperature programmer TMS94 (Linkam Scientific Instruments Ltd., Waterfield, Epsom, Tadworth KT20 5LR, UK). The birefringence at corresponding temperature was calculated from the measured phase retardation. Figure 1 describes the measured (dots) and fitting (solid line) results of birefringence at different temperatures with a working wavelength λ = 633 nm (He–Ne laser). The fitting curve is produced from following equation [26]:
Δ n = Δ n 0 S = Δ n 0 ( 1 T / T c ) β .
In Equation (1), Δn0 represents the extrapolated birefringence at T = 0 K, S is the order parameter, Tc (unit: K) is the clearing point temperature of the LC, which is measured by DSC, and exponent β is a material parameter. By fitting the experimental data with Equation (1), both Δn0 and β can be obtained. The results are listed in Table 2. For convenience, we use Celsius (°C) instead of Kelvin temperature (K) in the following figures.
The wavelength dispersion of A4907 is also investigated. For a working LCoS device, the operating temperature is about 40–50 °C because of the thermal effect from the CMOS backplane and illumination light. Therefore, we measured the wavelength dispersion at 40 °C to investigate the electro-optical performances at RGB colors. In experiment, He-Ne laser (λ = 632.8 nm) and a tunable Argon ion laser (λ = 457 nm, 488 nm, and 514 nm) were used as probing light sources. The obtained results are shown in Figure 2, where dots indicate measured data and solid line is the fitting curve using the single-band birefringence dispersion equation, which works for LC mixtures [27]:
Δ n = G λ 2 λ 2 λ 2 λ 2 .
In Equation (2), G is the proportionality constant and λ* is the mean resonance wavelength. Both G and λ* can be obtained by fitting experimental data with Equation (2) and results are listed in Table 2. At 40 °C, the Δn of A4907 is 0.200 at λ = 633 nm but slightly decreases to 0.185 at λ = 905 nm.

2.2. Viscoelastic Constant

The viscoelastic constant γ1/K11 is also temperature dependent. We obtain this value from the measured transient decay time of the LC cell. The experimental (squares) and fitting (solid line) results are shown in Figure 3. The fitting curve is plotted from following equation [19]:
γ 1 K 11 = A exp ( E a / k B T ) ( 1 T / T c ) β .
In Equation (3), kB is the Boltzmann constant, Ea is the activation energy, and A is the proportionality constant, whose values are also included in Table 2.

2.3. Figure of Merit

Figure of merit, defined as F o M =   Δ n 2 / ( γ 1 / K 11 ) , is a fair way to compare the electro-optic performance of different materials [19]. Results are plotted in Figure 4, where the dots are experimental data and the solid line is the fitting curve. As the temperature increases, FoM increases first, reaching a peak, and then declines sharply as the temperature approaches Tc. Detailed mechanisms have been explained in [19]. In brief, as the temperature increases, both Δn and γ1/K11 decrease but at different rates. In the beginning, Δn decreases more slowly than γ1/K11, leading to an increased FoM. As the temperature approaches Tc, Δn decreases more rapidly than γ1/K11, resulting in a sharply declined FoM. The optimal operating temperature where FoM has a maximum value usually occurs at ~20 °C below Tc. From Figure 4, operating A4907 at 40 °C enhances the FoM by nearly 2X than that at 22 °C.

2.4. Voltage Dependent Phase Change

As mentioned before, the operating temperature of a working LCoS device is about 40−50 °C. Therefore, our studies focus on two temperatures: 40 °C and 50 °C. In experiment, the voltage-dependent transmittance (V-T) curve of A4907 was measured at λ = 633 nm, then it was converted to the voltage-dependent phase (V-Φ) curve depicted in Figure 5. We should mention here that our measurement is based on transmission-type cells, but the results can be converted to the corresponding reflection-type cells easily. According to Figure 5, the V2π of A4907 is 2.6 Vrms at 40 °C and 2.7 Vrms at 50 °C (red lines). The reason that V2π slightly increases is mainly attributed to the decreased birefringence as the temperature increases. Since our allowed V2π is 5 Vrms, we could use a thinner cell gap to achieve the desired 2π phase change. However, the cell gap in our lab is limited, but we can extrapolate the V-Φ curve of a different cell gap by using the phase retardation equation δ =dΔn/λ. For example, if the operating temperature is 50 °C, then a thinner cell gap (3.95 μm transmissive cell or 1.98 μm reflective LCoS) can be applied to make V2π at 5 Vrms, as the blue line shows. In the meantime, the response time will be faster, which will be discussed quantitatively later.
Similar to λ = 633 nm, we can also study the V-Φ curve of this material at λ = 905 nm, which is the typical working wavelength for LIDAR. Based on the measured V-Φ curve at λ = 633nm, we can convert it to a desired wavelength using the phase retardation equation δ =dΔn/λ. According to the fitting results in Figure 2, we find the birefringence of A4907 is 0.200 at λ = 633 nm and 0.185 at λ = 905 nm. Thus, it is quite straightforward to convert the V-Φ curve from λ = 633 nm (red solid line) to that at λ = 905 nm, as the red dashed lines show in Figure 6. However, after conversion the phase change is slightly less than 2π at 5V. Therefore, we slightly increase the cell gap from 5.34 μm to 5.81 μm to boost the phase change to 2π at 5V. The results are plotted in Figure 6 as the blue dashed lines.

2.5. Response Time

The switching time (rise time and decay time) of an LC phase modulator between two gray levels (V1 and V2) are determined by the LC cell gap, viscoelastic constant, threshold voltage and operating voltages as follows [28]:
τ o n = τ 0 ( V 2 / V t h ) 2 1 ,
τ o f f = τ 0 | ( V 1 / V t h ) 2 1 | ,
τ 0 = γ 1 d 2 K 11 π 2 .
In Equations (4)–(6), Vth is the threshold voltage, τ0 is the free relaxation time, V1 and V2 are the low and high gray-level voltage, respectively. According to previous investigations [28,29], the sum of free relaxation time (V1 = 0) and turn-on time (V2 = 8th gray level) is about the same as the average gray-to-gray rise and decay time. Therefore, we let V1 = 0 and V2 = V2π in the response time extrapolation later.
We measured the rise time and decay time of A4907 at T = 40 °C and 50 °C with 2π phase change voltage. Then the experimental data are converted to reflection-type cells. Results are shown in Table 3. Since the cell gap of the converted reflection-type cell is only one half of the transmissive one, its response time is 4x faster than that of the corresponding transmissive cell. For a d = 5.34 μm transmission-type cell at λ = 633 nm, the total response time (τon + τoff) is 8.25 ms at T = 40 °C, and 6.23 ms at 50 °C. Since the allowed V2π is 5 Vrms, a thinner cell gap can be adopted, as mentioned above (blue lines in Figure 5). Under such condition, the value of V2π increases, which significantly reduces the rise time, as Equation (4) indicates. For a 1.88 μm reflection-type cell, the extrapolated total response time is 2.5 ms at T = 40 °C. If the operation temperature is increased to 50 °C, the total response time is further reduced to 2.20 ms by using a 1.98 μm cell gap in reflective mode, which enables an LCoS SLM to operate at 400 Hz. Furthermore, if the working wavelength shifts to 905 nm for LIDAR applications at T= 40 °C, then the corresponding cell gap should increase to 2.91 μm for reflective mode, so that V2π is 5 Vrms. In this case, the total response time is 5.9 ms.

2.6. Photostability

For LCoS projection displays, the employed light source could be a high-power arc lamp, RGB LEDs, or lasers. Although only RGB wavelengths are considered, the device lifetime could still be affected by the blue light, depending on the employed organic or inorganic alignment layer and the LC compound structures. For high brightness displays, inorganic SiOx alignment layers [22] have been proven to be robust after long-term UV or blue light exposure [23], but high Δn LC materials with excellent photostability in the blue spectral region still have not been investigated thoroughly.
To study the photostability of A4907, we filled the LC mixture in a 9.42 µm test cell. This test cell is comprised of ITO (indium tin oxide)–glass substrates overcoated with an inorganic SiOx alignment layer. Then, the filled test cell was exposed to a high-power CW laser with λ = 465 nm and intensity of 72 W/cm2. We checked the birefringence and viscoelastic constant of the sample every 24 h. The measured results are recorded in Figure 7. As the dosage increases, Δn and γ1/K11 remain basically unchanged in the first 20 MJ/cm2. To rule out the damage from SiOx alignment layer and ITO, we measured the photostability of an empty cell without LC. Results indicate that the empty cell can survive over 500 MJ/cm2 dosage by the same high-power CW laser.

3. Conclusions

In conclusion, a new LC mixture, designated as A4907, was developed. This mixture is a promising candidate for high brightness LCoS SLM and LIDAR applications. A4907 exhibits fast response time, low operation voltage, and adequate photostability. It achieves 2.5 ms total response time at 40 °C for λ = 633nm, and 5.9 ms for λ = 905nm, respectively, while the 2π phase change voltage remains as low as 5 Vrms. No sign of photodegradation up to 20 MJ/cm2 dosage is observed at λ = 465 nm. Practical applications of A4907 for laser-based SLMs, LiDAR, high brightness AR displays, and head-up displays are foreseeable.

Author Contributions

Methodology, J.Z., Q.Y., and E.-L.H.; Material optimization, H.O., Z.Y., K.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, J.Z.; writing—review and editing, S.-T.W.; supervision, S.-T.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Sony Corporation.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The UCF group is indebted to Sony Corp. for the financial support, and Akiko Toriyama and Koichi Nagasawa for useful discussion.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Schadt, M. Milestone in the history of field-effect liquid crystal displays and materials. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 48, 03B001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Huang, Y.; Hsiang, E.L.; Deng, M.Y.; Wu, S.T. Mini-LED, micro-LED and OLED displays: Present status and future perspectives. Light Sci. Appl. 2020, 9, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhan, T.; Yin, K.; Xiong, J.; He, Z.; Wu, S.T. Augmented reality and virtual reality: Perspectives and challenges. iScience 2020, 23, 101397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhan, T.; Lee, Y.H.; Tan, G.; Xiong, J.; Yin, K.; Gou, F.; Zou, J.; Zhang, N.; Zhao, D.; Yang, J.; et al. Pancharatnam-Berry optical elements for head-up and near-eye displays. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2019, 36, D52–D65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. McManamon, P.F.; Dorschner, T.A.; Corkum, D.L.; Friedman, L.J.; Hobbs, D.S.; Holz, M.; Liberman, S.; Nguyen, H.Q.; Resler, D.P.; Sharp, R.C.; et al. Optical phased array technology. Proc. IEEE 1996, 84, 268–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cuypers, D.; de Smet, H.; van Calster, A. VAN LCOS microdisplays: A decade of technological evolution. J. Disp. Technol. 2011, 7, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Zhang, Z.; You, Z.; Chu, D. Fundamentals of phase-only liquid crystal on silicon (LCOS) devices. Light Sci. Appl. 2014, 3, e216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, H.M.; Yang, J.P.; Yen, H.T.; Hsu, Z.N.; Huang, Y.; Wu, S.T. Pursuing high quality phase-only liquid crystal on silicon (LCoS) devices. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 2323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Zhan, T.; Xiong, J.; Zou, J.; Wu, S.T. Multifocal displays: Review and prospect. PhotoniX 2020, 1, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Hua, H. Enabling focus cues in head-mounted displays. Proc. IEEE 2017, 105, 805–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bahk, S.W.; Fess, E.; Kruschwitz, B.E.; Zuegel, J.D. A high-resolution, adaptive beam-shaping system for high-power lasers. Opt. Express 2010, 18, 9151–9163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hu, L.; Xuan, L.; Liu, Y.; Cao, Z.; Li, D.; Mu, Q. Phase-only liquid-crystal spatial light modulator for wave-front correction with high precision. Opt. Express 2004, 12, 6403–6409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Crossland, W.A.; Wilkinson, T.D.; Manolis, I.G.; Redmond, M.M.; Davey, A.B. Telecommunications applications of LCOS devices. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2002, 375, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Davis, S.R.; Sparks, A.W.; Fegely, L.; Gann, D.; Kemiao, J. Compact steering technologies for automotive lidar: A comparison between liquid crystal clad waveguides and optical mems. Appl. Lasers Sens. Free Space Commun. 2018, 3, STu2H-3. [Google Scholar]
  15. Li, S.Q.; Xu, X.; Veetil, R.M.; Valuckas, V.; Paniagua-Domínguez, R.; Kuznetsov, A.I. Phase-only transmissive spatial light modulator based on tunable dielectric metasurface. Science 2019, 364, 1087–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Maimone, A.; Georgiou, A.; Kollin, J.S. Holographic near-eye displays for virtual and augmented reality. ACM Trans. Graph. 2017, 36, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Matsuda, N.; Fix, A.; Lanman, D. Focal surface displays. ACM Trans. Graph. 2017, 36, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fan-Chiang, K.H.; Huang, S.H.; Shen, C.Y.; Wang, H.L.; Li, Y.W.; Tsai, H.C.; Huang, Y.P. Analog LCOS SLM devices for AR display applications. J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 2020, 28, 581–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wu, S.T.; Lackner, A.M.; Efron, U. Optimal operation temperature of liquid crystal modulators. Appl. Opt. 1987, 26, 3441–3445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lackner, A.M.; Margerum, J.D.; Miller, L.J.; Smith, W.H., Jr. Near ultraviolet photostability of liquid-crystal mixtures. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 1986, 141, 289–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yakovenko, S.; Konovalov, V.; Brennesholtz, M. Lifetime of single panel LCOS imagers. SID Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 2004, 35, 64–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Janning, J.L. Thin film surface orientation for liquid crystals. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1972, 21, 173–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wen, C.H.; Gauza, S.; Wu, S.T. Photostability of liquid crystals and alignment layers. J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 2005, 13, 805–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yang, Q.; Zou, J.; Li, Y.; Wu, S.T. Fast-response liquid crystal phase modulators with an excellent photostability. Crystals 2020, 10, 765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wu, S.T.; Wu, C.S. Rotational viscosity of nematic liquid crystals A critical examination of existing models. Liq. Cryst. 1990, 8, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wu, S.T.; Efron, U.; Hess, L.D. Birefringence measurements of liquid crystals. Appl. Opt. 1984, 23, 3911–3915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wu, S.T. Birefringence dispersions of liquid crystals. Phys. Rev. A 1986, 33, 1270–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Huang, Y.; He, Z.; Wu, S.T. Fast-response liquid crystal phase modulators for augmented reality displays. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 32757–32766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Chen, H.; Gou, F.; Wu, S.T. Submillisecond-response nematic liquid crystals for augmented reality displays. Opt. Mater. Express 2017, 7, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Temperature-dependent birefringence of A4907 at λ = 633 nm and 1 kHz. Dots are measured data and solid line is fitting curve with Equation (1).
Figure 1. Temperature-dependent birefringence of A4907 at λ = 633 nm and 1 kHz. Dots are measured data and solid line is fitting curve with Equation (1).
Crystals 11 00093 g001
Figure 2. Wavelength-dependent birefringence of A4907 at 40 °C and 1 kHz. Triangles are measured data and solid line is fitting curve with Equation (2).
Figure 2. Wavelength-dependent birefringence of A4907 at 40 °C and 1 kHz. Triangles are measured data and solid line is fitting curve with Equation (2).
Crystals 11 00093 g002
Figure 3. Temperature-dependent viscoelastic constant of DIC A4907. Squares are measured data and solid line is fitting curve with Equation (3).
Figure 3. Temperature-dependent viscoelastic constant of DIC A4907. Squares are measured data and solid line is fitting curve with Equation (3).
Crystals 11 00093 g003
Figure 4. Temperature-dependent FoM of DIC A4907. Squares are measured data and solid line is fitting curve.
Figure 4. Temperature-dependent FoM of DIC A4907. Squares are measured data and solid line is fitting curve.
Crystals 11 00093 g004
Figure 5. Measured (red line) voltage-dependent phase change of a transmissive A4907 test cell at λ = 633 nm and 1 kHz. Cell gap is d = 5.34 μm, with V2π = 2.6 Vrms at T = 40 °C in (a) and V2π = 2.7 Vrms at T = 50 °C in (b). If we operate A4907 at 50 °C, we could use a slightly thinner cell gap (3.95 μm transmissive cell or 1.98 μm reflective LCoS, blue line in (b)) to increase V2π to 5 Vrms.
Figure 5. Measured (red line) voltage-dependent phase change of a transmissive A4907 test cell at λ = 633 nm and 1 kHz. Cell gap is d = 5.34 μm, with V2π = 2.6 Vrms at T = 40 °C in (a) and V2π = 2.7 Vrms at T = 50 °C in (b). If we operate A4907 at 50 °C, we could use a slightly thinner cell gap (3.95 μm transmissive cell or 1.98 μm reflective LCoS, blue line in (b)) to increase V2π to 5 Vrms.
Crystals 11 00093 g005
Figure 6. Voltage-dependent phase change of a transmissive A4907 test cell at λ = 633 nm (red solid line, measured) and λ = 905 nm (red dashed line, converted). Cell gap is d = 5.34 μm at T = 40 °C. To obtain V2π = 5 Vrms, we should increase the cell gap from 5.34 μm to 5.81 μm (blue dashed lines).
Figure 6. Voltage-dependent phase change of a transmissive A4907 test cell at λ = 633 nm (red solid line, measured) and λ = 905 nm (red dashed line, converted). Cell gap is d = 5.34 μm at T = 40 °C. To obtain V2π = 5 Vrms, we should increase the cell gap from 5.34 μm to 5.81 μm (blue dashed lines).
Crystals 11 00093 g006
Figure 7. Measured photostability of A4907 with a blue laser at λ = 465 nm at 22 °C. Probing laser λ = 633 nm.
Figure 7. Measured photostability of A4907 with a blue laser at λ = 465 nm at 22 °C. Probing laser λ = 633 nm.
Crystals 11 00093 g007
Table 1. Measured physical properties of DIC A4907, MerckTL-216 and UCF-216 at T = 22 °C.
Table 1. Measured physical properties of DIC A4907, MerckTL-216 and UCF-216 at T = 22 °C.
LC MixtureA4907TL-216UCF-216
Tc (°C)91.980.081.8
Tm (°C)−19−20−20
Δn @ 633 nm0.2200.2050.215
ε @ 1 kHz7.35.57.6
ε @ 1 kHz3.84.24.2
K11 (pN)13.314.414.6
K33 (pN)16.319.6---
γ1/K11 (ms/µm2)12.919.014.5
Table 2. Fitting parameters obtained through Equations (1)–(3).
Table 2. Fitting parameters obtained through Equations (1)–(3).
LC MixtureΔn0βG @ 40 °C
(µm−2)
λ* @ 40 °C
(µm)
A
(ms/µm2)
Ea
(meV)
A49070.3260.2493.060.2376.19 × 10−6358
Table 3. Measured response time of a transmissive A4907 with d = 5.34 μm, and the extrapolated response time to the corresponding reflective cells at 40 °C (λ = 633 nm and λ = 905 nm) and 50 °C (λ = 633 nm).
Table 3. Measured response time of a transmissive A4907 with d = 5.34 μm, and the extrapolated response time to the corresponding reflective cells at 40 °C (λ = 633 nm and λ = 905 nm) and 50 °C (λ = 633 nm).
T (°C)λ (nm)d (μm)Vth (V)V2π (V)τon (ms)τoff (ms)τtotal (ms)
Transmissive
τtotal (ms)
Reflective
406335.341.32.616.616.433.08.3
406333.751.35.01.88.110.02.5
409055.811.35.04.319.423.65.9
506335.341.32.711.613.324.96.2
506333.951.35.01.57.38.82.2
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zou, J.; Yang, Q.; Hsiang, E.-L.; Ooishi, H.; Yang, Z.; Yoshidaya, K.; Wu, S.-T. Fast-Response Liquid Crystal for Spatial Light Modulator and LiDAR Applications. Crystals 2021, 11, 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11020093

AMA Style

Zou J, Yang Q, Hsiang E-L, Ooishi H, Yang Z, Yoshidaya K, Wu S-T. Fast-Response Liquid Crystal for Spatial Light Modulator and LiDAR Applications. Crystals. 2021; 11(2):93. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11020093

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zou, Junyu, Qian Yang, En-Lin Hsiang, Haruki Ooishi, Zhuo Yang, Kifumi Yoshidaya, and Shin-Tson Wu. 2021. "Fast-Response Liquid Crystal for Spatial Light Modulator and LiDAR Applications" Crystals 11, no. 2: 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11020093

APA Style

Zou, J., Yang, Q., Hsiang, E.-L., Ooishi, H., Yang, Z., Yoshidaya, K., & Wu, S.-T. (2021). Fast-Response Liquid Crystal for Spatial Light Modulator and LiDAR Applications. Crystals, 11(2), 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11020093

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop