Next Article in Journal
Effect of Internal Radiation on Process Parameters in the Global Simulation of Growing Large-Size Bulk β-Ga2O3 Single Crystals with the Czochralski Method
Previous Article in Journal
Dendritic Growth in Si1−xGex Melts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Perspective

Have Covalent Organic Framework Films Revealed Their Full Potential?

Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Göteborg, Sweden
Crystals 2021, 11(7), 762; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11070762
Submission received: 4 June 2021 / Revised: 24 June 2021 / Accepted: 26 June 2021 / Published: 29 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Organic Crystalline Materials)

Abstract

:
Porous organic polymers provide high accessible surface areas, which make them attractive for gas storage, separation, and catalysis. In addition to those classical usage areas, such compounds are particularly interesting for electronic applications since their high dimensional, electron-rich backbone provides advanced electronic and photophysical properties. However, their non-soluble nature is a challenge for their processability, especially in the case of film formation, hence their limited utilization in organic electronic devices so far. Nevertheless, there are several techniques presented in the literature to overcome that issue, most of which were on the crystalline porous organic polymers, namely covalent organic frameworks (COFs). In this perspective, the developments on COF film formation and prospects for the improvements are discussed with suggestions to further their performances in organic electronics.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Porous materials have been used in a great range of applications from gas storage, separation to catalysis, and have shown excellent performances thanks to their accessible high surface areas and structural diversity [1,2]. Such materials can be molecular or polymeric, in solid or liquid forms (recently porous glasses have been promoted as a sub-form), and are categorized into three groups depending on their building-blocks; inorganic (e.g., zeolites, porous carbon), organic-inorganic hybrid (e.g., metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), organosilicas), and fully organic porous materials (e.g., conjugated microporous polymers (CMPs), covalent organic frameworks (COFs)) [3].
Each of the above classes has its advantages or disadvantages for the corresponding usage areas, which make them unique for various applications [4]. For example, fully inorganic porous materials provide very good hydro-thermal stability; thus, they are preferred for high-temperature catalytic reactions [5,6]. On the other hand, MOFs have been the most attractive sub-class amongst porous materials [7,8,9,10], from which the highest surface areas were reported until now [11]. The last group, fully organic porous materials, are particularly promising for photocatalysis and electronics due to the easier tunability of their backbone via combining different electron-donating/accepting moieties bearing task-specific functionalities [12,13]. Since this perspective will focus on the developments and further challenges of (crystalline) porous organic polymer film formation and their utilization in organic electronics, discussions on other classes henceforth will be omitted.
The suitable building blocks to produce porous organic polymers should be rigid and should not possess bulky side groups. The former is important to prevent the collapse of the structure through the empty voids (pores) and the latter is necessary to avoid pore blockage. Moreover, the polymerization direction should not be linear, therefore, at least one of the (co)monomers should be angled. These struts are named as structure directing motives or tectons [14], which are generally crosslinkers.
Common methods for COF syntheses involve hydrothermal and ionothermal techniques by using either thermal or microwave heating [15,16]. Additionally, other routes such as light irradiation and using catalysts to produce COFs under ambient conditions were also reported [17,18,19]. COF formation reactions mostly take place in a closed cup (i.e., in an autoclave equipped with a Teflon inlet) for extended periods (up to 5 days) in order to yield the most thermodynamically stable, non-soluble, and crystalline product through dynamic covalent chemistry (DCC) [20]. It is worth noting that DCC requires specific end groups and reaction mechanisms (some popular examples can be seen in Figure 1) allowing the reversible reactions for structural error-check and fixing [21,22]. On the other hand, standard put and stir techniques lead to the most kinetically favorable products which generally yield an amorphous backbone, among which the most famous ones are CMPs, polymers with intrinsic microporosity (PIMs), and porous aromatic frameworks (PAFs) [23].

2. Techniques for Covalent Organic Framework Film Formation

The moderate–high surface areas and (hydro)thermal stability of porous polymers allow them to exhibit comparable performances with their fully inorganic and organic-inorganic hybrid cousins for the common application areas listed above. That being said, the porous and high dimensional backbone of such organic compounds make them more attractive for light-driven and electronic applications such as sensing, photocatalysis, and organic electronics [13,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. This is because the empty voids inside the pores are perfectly separated phases allowing enhanced charge-transfer with the prospective guests (i.e., analytes for sensors or fullerenes for bulk-heterojunction photovoltaic devices) while high dimensionality provide direction-independent electronic conductivity (i.e., no face-on/edge-on limitations which occur in the devices built by using 1D polymers) through the devices [33,35,40,41,42,43].
As is illustrated in Figure 2, the guests expected to be placed in the pores rather than populating on the surfaces of porous polymeric compounds. Similar conclusions were drawn through computational techniques [44,45]. Moreover, those studies indicated the interferences along π-electrons are the main driving forces for the host-guest interactions in case of such electron-rich, conjugated host-guests [44,45]. The quench of photoluminescence after nitrobenzene (electron acceptor) exposure during the optical sensing applications can be a good experimental proof for this behavior [33,46,47,48,49].
Since porous organic polymers have a non-soluble nature (except some PIMs) due to their highly rigid, branched, long-alkyl-free backbone, forming uniform films from those compounds has been a challenge for their integration to devices, hence their limited utilization for electronic applications [50]. Indeed, there have been several attempts to overcome this issue [41,51]. The frequently used method to produce COF films is their in-situ formation over the substrates placed in the reaction media [52,53]. The tricky part of this method is to place the active side of the substrate face-down (to the bottom of the reaction vessel) to prevent agglomeration of the big particles on the film surface.
Another similar approach is the vapor-assisted film formation, which is basically drop-casting of the co-monomers and allowing them to react in a closed cup with the help of solvent vapor (Figure 3) [54,55]. The film properties can be adjusted by changing the vapor exposure time, concentration of the co-monomers, and the coating style (e.g., spin coating, drop-casting, dip coating), which gives more control on the output when compared to the previous “in-situ” method.
The use of flow chemistry to produce uniform COF films was also presented [56]. Since the flow technique allows large-scale and continuous production, the method is rather intriguing for the industry. Moreover, the study shows the flow technique enables more control over the film formation kinetics when compared to the above mentioned in-situ method (statical film formation in bulk) [56]. Aside from adjusting the (co)monomer concentrations poured over the substrate, reaction temperature and residence time in the reactor can be key factors to control film properties. Notwithstanding the amorphous nature of the final material, a similar method was applied to form PAF films over pre-functionalized substrates [57], and the findings showed that flow chemistry helped to improve film quality with respect to the previously published bulk method [58].
In-situ forming free-standing COF films on the surface of the reaction media (i.e., liquid + air interface) [59,60] or between the heterogeneous liquid-liquid mixtures (i.e., water phase + organic phase) [61,62] have been attractive methods as well. The latter technique has been applied more frequently probably due to easier handling and the possibility of controlled large-area free-standing film production, which has expanded the application areas of COF films to gas separation products (Figure 4) [63,64,65,66].
Aside from growing COFs on the substrates from precursors, depositing the formed COF particles on surfaces has also been studied. There are examples of forming COF films from their dispersed powders via spin-coating, and the films obtained were able to be utilized in solar cells [67,68]. Additionally, suspending COF powders in a highly viscous polymer matrix and the subsequent film formation was also reported, and the films were applied in organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) [69]. Synthesis of colloidal COF particles and the subsequent casting of their films from those solutions were also presented [70]. Spray coating of COF powders dispersed in inks to yield large area COF films was another interesting method [71]. Moreover, electrophoretic deposition of COFs onto substrates was also successfully presented in the literature (Figure 5) [72]. Aside from reporting a novel method for COF film formation, another interesting piece of information in this article was the deposition of all of the three structurally different COFs (see Figure 5) took place on the positive electrode due to their negative surface potential [72].
In addition to the above methods focusing on the crystalline porous organic polymers, it is worth mentioning that electrochemical polymerization was also applied to yield amorphous porous organic polymer films [73]. Crosslinking of electrochemically active monomers under suitable potentials yielded highly porous films, which were applied in sensors and organic electronic devices [74,75,76,77,78,79,80]. Moreover, thin films of long alkyl chain bearing CMP-like structures (conjugated and hyper-branched, yet non-porous due to the pore blockage of the bulky alkyl groups) were formed via classical techniques (e.g., spin coating from the homogenous solutions), and successfully applied in photovoltaics [81,82,83].

3. Outlook and Conclusion

Although there have been many approaches to form uniform films from (crystalline) porous organic polymers, their full potential in organic electronics has not been revealed. Several reasons can be speculated for this issue; for example, the structural torsion, defects, and grain boundaries over the formed films affecting uniformity and pore accessibility [84,85,86]. Especially the last one should not be underestimated since it can happen due to various issues such as hindered catalysts/monomers in the voids or partially blocked pores due to poor solvent removal (pore activation). Moreover, even though the COF films look smooth and uniform just after casting, accessibility of pores may change during processing or device operation. For example, some devices operate under elevated temperatures which may lead to evaporation of solvents stuck in the pores, which can result in altered porous structure or shrinking of the films [87].
Aside from developing strategies for film formation, thinking over the structural properties of COFs planned to be filmed should also be considered for improvement [88,89]. For example, limited conjugation through the common connection moieties (e.g., boronic acid esters, hydrazones) or traditional cross-linkers (e.g., triazine, triphenylamine, triphenylene) lead to short conjugation lengths through the branched polymer chains [90]. For the former, investigations concentrated on the COFs connected by vinylene (-C=C-) bonds can be a solution [91] while introducing crosslinkers allowing extended conjugation such as spirobiflourenes [92,93] can help to overcome the latter. Furthermore, given most of the COFs are 2D, the formed films can still suffer from orientation issues despite the high-dimensionality since 2D COFs have a tendency to form “face-on” films [94]. In that case, the crosslinkers like spirobiflourenes can also help to increase the dimensionality of the sheets from 2D to 3D and may lead to better hole/electron conductivity through devices [40].
On the other hand, it is better to keep in mind that mixing the conventional and unconventional can yield unique behaviors, which may lead to revolutionary outputs. Therefore, rational design strategies to combine those variables should be an option to enrich the portfolio of such materials. For example, the cross-conjugation [95] in common COFs can also be an asset for electronics [49,96] as well as some irregularities along the structure [97,98]. Furthermore, donor-acceptor COFs have a tendency to form nearly perfect donor-donor and acceptor-acceptor eclipsed stackings leading to excellent charge separation and extended bicontinuous electron/hole conducting columns (Figure 6A), which is unlike slipped/tilted alternating intermolecular donor-acceptor overlaps of the ordinary (linear and soluble) conjugated polymers [99,100,101,102]. Yet, this strict order in COFs might also result in a poor charge delocalization through the COF interlayers [103]. Recently, Li et al. showed it is possible to react a donor-acceptor charge-transfer complex via DCC to form COFs [104]. In that work, an aldehyde functionalized acceptor unit previously interacted with a non-functionalized donor compound to produce the charge-transfer complex, which was further reacted with an imine crosslinker to yield a COF having donor-acceptor stackings (Figure 6B) [104]. Additionally, performing band-gap engineering via post-synthetic linker exchange on already formed COFs or in-situ linker doping may result in alternation on the structure, and lead to interesting electronical properties [105,106,107,108,109].
In conclusion, intensive investigations in COF films started a decade ago and topped last year. Thus, the recent developments on the characterization methods with adaptation of advanced techniques will indeed improve the understanding on the fundamental properties of COFs, which will surely lead to their better utilization [84,85,110,111,112]. Furthermore, increasing numbers of consortiums on solar fuel production will pave the way for further collaborations with expert researchers in organo-electronics and porous materials, which will probably result in better integration of COFs to organic electronic devices, and help them to demonstrate their full potential.

Funding

The author would like to acknowledge the Swedish Energy Agency and the Swedish Foundation FORMAS for financial support.

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Kasper Moth-Poulsen from Chalmers University of Technology for his general support.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kumar, K.V.; Preuss, K.; Titirici, M.M.; Rodríguez-Reinoso, F. Nanoporous Materials for the Onboard Storage of Natural Gas. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 1796–1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bavykina, A.; Kolobov, N.; Khan, I.S.; Bau, J.A.; Ramirez, A.; Gascon, J. Metal-Organic Frameworks in Heterogeneous Catalysis: Recent Progress, New Trends, and Future Perspectives. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 8468–8535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Bennett, T.D.; Coudert, F.X.; James, S.L.; Cooper, A.I. The changing state of porous materials. Nat. Mater. 2021, 60, 5890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Slater, A.G.; Cooper, A.I. Function-led design of new porous materials. Science 2015, 348, aaa8075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rahimi, N.; Karimzadeh, R. Catalytic cracking of hydrocarbons over modified ZSM-5 zeolites to produce light olefins: A review. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2011, 398, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Standl, S.; Hinrichsen, O. Kinetic Modeling of Catalytic Olefin Cracking and Methanol-to-Olefins (MTO) over Zeolites: A Review. Catalysts 2018, 8, 626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Chen, Z.; Li, P.; Anderson, R.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Robison, L.; Redfern, L.R.; Moribe, S.; Islamoglu, T.; Gómez-Gualdrón, D.A.; et al. Balancing volumetric and gravimetric uptake in highly porous materials for clean energy. Science 2020, 368, 297–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jaros, S.W.; Smoleński, P.; Guedes da Silva, M.F.C.; Florek, M.; Król, J.; Staroniewicz, Z.; Pombeiro, A.J.L.; Kirillov, A.M. New silver BioMOFs driven by 1,3,5-triaza-7-phosphaadamantane-7-sulfide (PTA = S): Synthesis, topological analysis and antimicrobial activity. Cryst. Eng. Comm. 2013, 15, 8060–8064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, Y.; Chang, C.H. Metal-organic framework thin films: Fabrication, modification, and patterning. Processes 2020, 8, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Freund, R.; Canossa, S.; Cohen, S.M.; Yan, W.; Deng, H.; Guillerm, V.; Eddaoudi, M.; Madden, D.G.; Fairen-Jimenez, D.; Lyu, H.; et al. 25 years of Reticular Chemistry. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Farha, O.K.; Eryazici, I.; Jeong, N.C.; Hauser, B.G.; Wilmer, C.E.; Sarjeant, A.A.; Snurr, R.Q.; Nguyen, S.T.; Yazaydin, A.Ö.; Hupp, J.T. Metal-organic framework materials with ultrahigh surface areas: Is the sky the limit? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 15016–15021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Xiao, J.; Liu, X.; Pan, L.; Shi, C.; Zhang, X.; Zou, J.J. Heterogeneous Photocatalytic Organic Transformation Reactions Using Conjugated Polymers-Based Materials. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 12256–12283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Thomas, A. Much ado about nothing—A decade of porous materials research. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Thomas, A. Functional materials: From hard to soft porous frameworks. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 8328–8344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Huang, N.; Wang, P.; Jiang, D. Covalent organic frameworks: A materials platform for structural and functional designs. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 16068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Díaz de Greñu, B.; Torres, J.; García-González, J.; Muñoz-Pina, S.; de los Reyes, R.; Costero, A.M.; Amorós, P.; Ros-Lis, J.V. Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Covalent Organic Frameworks: A Review. ChemSusChem 2021, 14, 208–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Matsumoto, M.; Dasari, R.R.; Ji, W.; Feriante, C.H.; Parker, T.C.; Marder, S.R.; Dichtel, W.R. Rapid, Low Temperature Formation of Imine-Linked Covalent Organic Frameworks Catalyzed by Metal Triflates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 4999–5002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhu, D.; Zhang, Z.; Alemany, L.B.; Li, Y.; Nnorom, N.; Barnes, M.; Khalil, S.; Rahman, M.M.; Ajayan, P.M.; Verduzco, R. Rapid, Ambient Temperature Synthesis of Imine Covalent Organic Frameworks Catalyzed by Transition-Metal Nitrates. Chem. Mater. 2021, 33, 3394–3400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, M.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, M.; Chen, J.; Zhang, S.; Zhou, X.; He, L.; Sheridan, M.V.; Yuan, M.; Zhang, M.; et al. Electron Beam Irradiation as a General Approach for the Rapid Synthesis of Covalent Organic Frameworks under Ambient Conditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 9169–9174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hu, J.; Gupta, S.K.; Ozdemir, J.; Beyzavi, M.H. Applications of Dynamic Covalent Chemistry Concept toward Tailored Covalent Organic Framework Nanomaterials: A Review. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 6239–6269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, R.; Tan, K.T.; Gong, Y.; Chen, Y.; Li, Z.; Xie, S.; He, T.; Lu, Z.; Yang, H.; Jiang, D. Covalent organic frameworks: An ideal platform for designing ordered materials and advanced applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 120–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lyle, S.J.; Waller, P.J.; Yaghi, O.M. Covalent Organic Frameworks: Organic Chemistry Extended into Two and Three Dimensions. Trends Chem. 2019, 1, 172–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chaoui, N.; Trunk, M.; Dawson, R.; Schmidt, J.; Thomas, A. Trends and challenges for microporous polymers. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 3302–3321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Côté, A.P.; Benin, A.I.; Ockwig, N.W.; O’Keeffe, M.; Matzger, A.J.; Yaghi, O.M. Chemistry: Porous, crystalline, covalent organic frameworks. Science 2005, 310, 1166–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Kuhn, P.; Antonietti, M.; Thomas, A. Porous, covalent triazine-based frameworks prepared by ionothermal synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3450–3453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Uribe-Romo, F.J.; Doonan, C.J.; Furukawa, H.; Oisaki, K.; Yaghi, O.M. Crystalline covalent organic frameworks with hydrazone linkages. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 11478–11481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lyu, H.; Diercks, C.S.; Zhu, C.; Yaghi, O.M. Porous Crystalline Olefin-Linked Covalent Organic Frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 6848–6852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Acharjya, A.; Pachfule, P.; Roeser, J.; Schmitt, F.J.; Thomas, A. Vinylene-Linked Covalent Organic Frameworks by Base-Catalyzed Aldol Condensation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 14865–14870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Uribe-Romo, F.J.; Hunt, J.R.; Furukawa, H.; Klöck, C.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O.M. A crystalline imine-linked 3-D porous covalent organic framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 4570–4571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhuang, X.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, F.; Cao, Y.; Liu, F.; Bi, S.; Feng, X. A two-dimensional conjugated polymer framework with fully sp2-bonded carbon skeleton. Polym. Chem. 2016, 7, 4176–4181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Jin, E.; Asada, M.; Xu, Q.; Dalapati, S.; Addicoat, M.A.; Brady, M.A.; Xu, H.; Nakamura, T.; Heine, T.; Chen, Q.; et al. Two-dimensional sp2 carbon–conjugated covalent organic frameworks. Science 2017, 357, 673–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Zwijnenburg, M.A.; Cheng, G.; McDonald, T.O.; Jelfs, K.E.; Jiang, J.X.; Ren, S.; Hasell, T.; Blanc, F.; Cooper, A.I.; Adams, D.J. Shedding light on structure-property relationships for conjugated microporous polymers: The importance of rings and strain. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 7696–7704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, X.; Xu, Y.; Jiang, D. Conjugated microporous polymers as molecular sensing devices: Microporous architecture enables rapid response and enhances sensitivity in fluorescence-on and fluorescence-off sensing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 8738–8741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dadashi-Silab, S.; Bildirir, H.; Dawson, R.; Thomas, A.; Yagci, Y. Microporous thioxanthone polymers as heterogeneous photoinitiators for visible light induced free radical and cationic polymerizations. Macromolecules 2014, 47, 4607–4614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bildirir, H.; Osken, I.; Ozturk, T.; Thomas, A. Reversible Doping of a Dithienothiophene-Based Conjugated Microporous Polymer. Chem. A Eur. J. 2015, 21, 9306–9311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kulkarni, R.; Noda, Y.; Kumar Barange, D.; Kochergin, Y.S.; Lyu, P.; Balcarova, B.; Nachtigall, P.; Bojdys, M.J. Real-time optical and electronic sensing with a β-amino enone linked, triazine-containing 2D covalent organic framework. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Yang, J.; Acharjya, A.; Ye, M.-Y.; Rabeah, J.; Li, S.; Kochovski, Z.; Youk, S.; Roeser, J.; Grüneberg, J.; Schwarze, M.; et al. Protonated imine-linked covalent organic frameworks for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, n/a. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Edhborg, F.; Bildirir, H.; Bharmoria, P.; Moth-Poulsen, K.; Albinsson, B. Intramolecular Triplet–Triplet Annihilation Photon Upconversion in Diffusionally Restricted Anthracene Polymer. J. Phys. Chem. B 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Wang, D.G.; Qiu, T.; Guo, W.; Liang, Z.; Tabassum, H.; Xia, D.; Zou, R. Covalent organic framework-based materials for energy applications. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021, 14, 688–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Skabara, P.J.; Arlin, J.B.; Geerts, Y.H. Close encounters of the 3D kind—Exploiting high dimensionality in molecular semiconductors. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 1948–1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bildirir, H.; Gregoriou, V.G.; Avgeropoulos, A.; Scherf, U.; Chochos, C.L. Porous organic polymers as emerging new materials for organic photovoltaic applications: Current status and future challenges. Mater. Horizons 2017, 4, 546–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fritz, P.W.; Coskun, A. The Prospect of Dimensionality in Porous Semiconductors. Chem. A Eur. J. 2021, 27, 7489–7501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Martínez-Abadía, M.; Strutyński, K.; Lerma-Berlanga, B.; Stoppiello, C.T.; Khlobystov, A.N.; Martí-Gastaldo, C.; Saeki, A.; Melle-Franco, M.; Mateo-Alonso, A. π-Interpenetrated 3D Covalent Organic Frameworks from Distorted Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 9941–9946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Xu, L.; Li, Y. Responsive Guest Encapsulation of Dynamic Conjugated Microporous Polymers. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 28784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Cox, J.M.; Mileson, B.; Sadagopan, A.; Lopez, S.A. Molecular Recognition and Band Alignment in 3D Covalent Organic Frameworks for Cocrystalline Organic Photovoltaics. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 9126–9133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gopalakrishnan, D.; Dichtel, W.R. Direct detection of RDX vapor using a conjugated polymer network. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 8357–8362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Namgung, H.; Lee, J.J.; Gwon, Y.J.; Lee, T.S. Synthesis of tetraphenylethylene-based conjugated microporous polymers for detection of nitroaromatic explosive compounds. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 34291–34296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Zhu, M.-W.; Xu, S.-Q.; Wang, X.-Z.; Chen, Y.; Dai, L.; Zhao, X. The construction of fluorescent heteropore covalent organic frameworks and their applications in spectroscopic and visual detection of trinitrophenol with high selectivity and sensitivity. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 2308–2311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chakravarty, C.; Mandal, B.; Sarkar, P. Multifunctionalities of an Azine-Linked Covalent Organic Framework: From Nanoelectronics to Nitroexplosive Detection and Conductance Switching. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 3245–3255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Allendorf, M.D.; Dong, R.; Feng, X.; Kaskel, S.; Matoga, D.; Stavila, V. Electronic Devices Using Open Framework Materials. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 8581–8640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bai, B.; Wang, D.; Wan, L.J. Synthesis of covalent organic framework films at interfaces. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2021, 94, 1090–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Colson, J.W.; Woll, A.R.; Mukherjee, A.; Levendorf, M.P.; Spitler, E.L.; Shields, V.B.; Spencer, M.G.; Park, J.; Dichtel, W.R. Oriented 2D covalent organic framework thin films on single-layer graphene. Science 2011, 332, 228–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dogru, M.; Handloser, M.; Auras, F.; Kunz, T.; Medina, D.; Hartschuh, A.; Knochel, P.; Bein, T. A photoconductive thienothiophene-based covalent organic framework showing charge transfer towards included fullerene. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 2920–2924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Medina, D.D.; Rotter, J.M.; Hu, Y.; Dogru, M.; Werner, V.; Auras, F.; Markiewicz, J.T.; Knochel, P.; Bein, T. Room temperature synthesis of covalent-organic framework films through vapor-assisted conversion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 1016–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Lv, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, G.; Peng, Z.; Ye, L.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, T.; Xing, G.; Chen, L. An In-situ Film-to-Film Transformation Approach toward Highly Crystalline Covalent Organic Framework Films. CCS Chem. 2021, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bisbey, R.P.; DeBlase, C.R.; Smith, B.J.; Dichtel, W.R. Two-dimensional Covalent Organic Framework Thin Films Grown in Flow. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 11433–11436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ratsch, M.; Ye, C.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, A.; Evans, A.M.; Börjesson, K. All-Carbon-Linked Continuous Three-Dimensional Porous Aromatic Framework Films with Nanometer-Precise Controllable Thickness. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 6548–6553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Becker, D.; Heidary, N.; Horch, M.; Gernert, U.; Zebger, I.; Schmidt, J.; Fischer, A.; Thomas, A. Microporous polymer network films covalently bound to gold electrodes. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 4283–4286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Feldblyum, J.I.; McCreery, C.H.; Andrews, S.C.; Kurosawa, T.; Santos, E.J.G.; Duong, V.; Fang, L.; Ayzner, A.L.; Bao, Z. Few-layer, large-area, 2D covalent organic framework semiconductor thin films. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 13894–13897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dai, W.; Shao, F.; Szczerbiński, J.; McCaffrey, R.; Zenobi, R.; Jin, Y.; Schlüter, A.D.; Zhang, W. Synthesis of a Two-Dimensional Covalent Organic Monolayer through Dynamic Imine Chemistry at the Air/Water Interface. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 213–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Sahabudeen, H.; Qi, H.; Glatz, B.A.; Tranca, D.; Dong, R.; Hou, Y.; Zhang, T.; Kuttner, C.; Lehnert, T.; Seifert, G.; et al. Wafer-sized multifunctional polyimine-based two-dimensional conjugated polymers with high mechanical stiffness. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Matsumoto, M.; Valentino, L.; Stiehl, G.M.; Balch, H.B.; Corcos, A.R.; Wang, F.; Ralph, D.C.; Mariñas, B.J.; Dichtel, W.R. Lewis-Acid-Catalyzed Interfacial Polymerization of Covalent Organic Framework Films. Chem 2018, 4, 308–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Zhang, B.; Song, X.; Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Peng, Z.; Ye, L.; Chen, L. 2D covalent organic framework thin films: Via interfacial self-polycondensation of an A2B2 type monomer. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 3253–3256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Dey, K.; Pal, M.; Rout, K.C.; Kunjattu, S.S.; Das, A.; Mukherjee, R.; Kharul, U.K.; Banerjee, R. Selective Molecular Separation by Interfacially Crystallized Covalent Organic Framework Thin Films. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 13083–13091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sasmal, H.S.; Halder, A.; Kunjattu, S.H.; Dey, K.; Nadol, A.; Ajithkumar, T.G.; Ravindra Bedadur, P.; Banerjee, R. Covalent Self-Assembly in Two Dimensions: Connecting Covalent Organic Framework Nanospheres into Crystalline and Porous Thin Films. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 20371–20379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ying, Y.; Yang, Z.; Shi, D.; Peh, S.B.; Wang, Y.; Yu, X.; Yang, H.; Chai, K.; Zhao, D. Ultrathin covalent organic framework film as membrane gutter layer for high-permeance CO2 capture. J. Memb. Sci. 2021, 632, 119384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Guo, J.; Xu, Y.; Jin, S.; Chen, L.; Kaji, T.; Honsho, Y.; Addicoat, M.A.; Kim, J.; Saeki, A.; Ihee, H.; et al. Conjugated organic framework with three-dimensionally ordered stable structure and delocalized π clouds. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Mohamed, M.G.; Lee, C.C.; EL-Mahdy, A.F.M.; Lüder, J.; Yu, M.H.; Li, Z.; Zhu, Z.; Chueh, C.C.; Kuo, S.W. Exploitation of two-dimensional conjugated covalent organic frameworks based on tetraphenylethylene with bicarbazole and pyrene units and applications in perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 11448–11459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Haldar, S.; Chakraborty, D.; Roy, B.; Banappanavar, G.; Rinku, K.; Mullangi, D.; Hazra, P.; Kabra, D.; Vaidhyanathan, R. Anthracene-Resorcinol Derived Covalent Organic Framework as Flexible White Light Emitter. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 13367–13374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Smith, B.J.; Parent, L.R.; Overholts, A.C.; Beaucage, P.A.; Bisbey, R.P.; Chavez, A.D.; Hwang, N.; Park, C.; Evans, A.M.; Gianneschi, N.C.; et al. Colloidal Covalent Organic Frameworks. ACS Cent. Sci. 2017, 3, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Evans, A.M.; Bradshaw, N.P.; Litchfield, B.; Strauss, M.J.; Seckman, B.; Ryder, M.R.; Castano, I.; Gilmore, C.; Gianneschi, N.C.; Mulzer, C.R.; et al. High-Sensitivity Acoustic Molecular Sensors Based on Large-Area, Spray-Coated 2D Covalent Organic Frameworks. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2004205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Rotter, J.M.; Weinberger, S.; Kampmann, J.; Sick, T.; Shalom, M.; Bein, T.; Medina, D.D. Covalent Organic Framework Films through Electrophoretic Deposition—Creating Efficient Morphologies for Catalysis. Chem. Mater. 2019, 31, 10008–10016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Palma-Cando, A.; Scherf, U. Electrochemically Generated Thin Films of Microporous Polymer Networks: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2016, 217, 827–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Gu, C.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Xue, S.; Sun, S.; Zhang, K.; Zhong, C.; Zhang, H.; Pan, Y.; Lv, Y.; et al. Electrochemical route to fabricate film-like conjugated microporous polymers and application for organic electronics. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 3443–3448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Palma-Cando, A.; Brunklaus, G.; Scherf, U. Thiophene-Based Microporous Polymer Networks via Chemical or Electrochemical Oxidative Coupling. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 6816–6824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Räupke, A.; Palma-Cando, A.; Shkura, E.; Teckhausen, P.; Polywka, A.; Görrn, P.; Scherf, U.; Riedl, T. Highly sensitive gas-phase explosive detection by luminescent microporous polymer networks. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 29118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Gu, C.; Huang, N.; Chen, Y.; Qin, L.; Xu, H.; Zhang, S.; Li, F.; Ma, Y.; Jiang, D. π-Conjugated Microporous Polymer Films: Designed Synthesis, Conducting Properties, and Photoenergy Conversions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 13594–13598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Gu, C.; Huang, N.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, S.; Li, F.; Ma, Y.; Jiang, D. Porous Organic Polymer Films with Tunable Work Functions and Selective Hole and Electron Flows for Energy Conversions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 3049–3053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yang, S.; Yang, C.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, Z.; Bi, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, H. A conjugated microporous polymer film fabricated by in situ electro-chemical deposition as a hole transporting layer in organic photovoltaics. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 9044–9048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Wu, J.; Liu, K.; Li, D.; Meng, Q.; Zhu, G. Electropolymerization Porous Aromatic Framework Film As a Hole-Transport Layer for Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells with Superior Stability. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 43688–43695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhang, J.; Xie, S.; Zhang, X.; Lu, Z.; Xiao, H.; Li, C.; Li, G.; Xu, X.; Chen, X.; Bo, Z. Hyperbranched polymer as an acceptor for polymer solar cells. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 537–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Bildirir, H.; Di Carlo Rasi, D.; Wienk, M.M.; Janssen, R.A.J.; Avgeropoulos, A.; Gregoriou, V.G.; Allard, S.; Scherf, U.; Chochos, C.L. New n-Type Solution Processable All Conjugated Polymer Network: Synthesis, Optoelectronic Characterization, and Application in Organic Solar Cells. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2018, 39, 1700629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Fu, Q.; Xu, Z.; Tang, X.; Liu, T.; Dong, X.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, N.; Xie, Z.; Liu, Y. Multifunctional Two-Dimensional Conjugated Materials for Dopant-Free Perovskite Solar Cells with Efficiency Exceeding 22%. ACS Energy Lett. 2021, 6, 1521–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Castano, I.; Evans, A.M.; Dos Reis, R.; Dravid, V.P.; Gianneschi, N.C.; Dichtel, W.R. Mapping Grains, Boundaries, and Defects in 2D Covalent Organic Framework Thin Films. Chem. Mater. 2021, 33, 1341–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Fenton, J.L.; Burke, D.W.; Qian, D.; La Cruz, M.O.D.; Dichtel, W.R. Polycrystalline Covalent Organic Framework Films Act as Adsorbents, Not Membranes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 1466–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Dey, K.; Bhunia, S.; Sasmal, H.S.; Reddy, C.M.; Banerjee, R. Self-Assembly-Driven Nanomechanics in Porous Covalent Organic Framework Thin Films. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 955–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Ma, Y.-X.; Li, Z.-J.; Wei, L.; Ding, S.-Y.; Zhang, Y.-B.; Wang, W. A Dynamic Three-Dimensional Covalent Organic Framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 4995–4998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Haase, F.; Lotsch, B.V. Solving the COF trilemma: Towards crystalline, stable and functional covalent organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 8469–8500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Mähringer, A.; Medina, D.D. Taking stock of stacking. Nat. Chem. 2020, 12, 985–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Souto, M.; Perepichka, D.F. Electrically conductive covalent organic frameworks: Bridging the fields of organic metals and 2D materials. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kang, J.; Huang, S.; Jiang, K.; Lu, C.; Chen, Z.; Zhu, J.; Yang, C.; Ciesielski, A.; Qiu, F.; Zhuang, X. 2D Porous Polymers with sp2-Carbon Connections and Sole sp2-Carbon Skeletons. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2000857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Byun, Y.; Xie, L.S.; Fritz, P.; Ashirov, T.; Dincă, M.; Coskun, A. A Three-Dimensional Porous Organic Semiconductor Based on Fully sp2-Hybridized Graphitic Polymer. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 15166–15170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Wu, C.; Liu, Y.; Liu, H.; Duan, C.; Pan, Q.; Zhu, J.; Hu, F.; Ma, X.; Jiu, T.; Li, Z.; et al. Highly Conjugated Three-Dimensional Covalent Organic Frameworks Based on Spirobifluorene for Perovskite Solar Cell Enhancement. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 10016–10024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Wang, H.; He, B.; Liu, F.; Stevens, C.; Brady, M.A.; Cai, S.; Wang, C.; Russell, T.P.; Tan, T.W.; Liu, Y. Orientation transitions during the growth of imine covalent organic framework thin films. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 5090–5095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Phelan, N.F.; Orchin, M. Cross conjugation. J. Chem. Educ. 1968, 45, 633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Van Pruissen, G.W.P.; Brebels, J.; Hendriks, K.H.; Wienk, M.M.; Janssen, R.A.J. Effects of cross-conjugation on the optical absorption and frontier orbital levels of donor-acceptor polymers. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 2435–2443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Gross, Y.M.; Trefz, D.; Tkachov, R.; Untilova, V.; Brinkmann, M.; Schulz, G.L.; Ludwigs, S. Tuning Aggregation by Regioregularity for High-Performance n-Type P(NDI2OD-T2) Donor-Acceptor Copolymers. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 5353–5366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Fall, S.; Biniek, L.; Odarchenko, Y.; Anokhin, D.V.; De Tournadre, G.; Lévêque, P.; Leclerc, N.; Ivanov, D.A.; Simonetti, O.; Giraudet, L.; et al. Tailoring the microstructure and charge transport in conjugated polymers by alkyl side-chain engineering. J. Mater. Chem. C 2016, 4, 286–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Jin, S.; Ding, X.; Feng, X.; Supur, M.; Furukawa, K.; Takahashi, S.; Addicoat, M.; El-Khouly, M.E.; Nakamura, T.; Irle, S.; et al. Charge dynamics in a donor-acceptor covalent organic framework with periodically ordered bicontinuous heterojunctions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 2017–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Jin, S.; Supur, M.; Addicoat, M.; Furukawa, K.; Chen, L.; Nakamura, T.; Fukuzumi, S.; Irle, S.; Jiang, D. Creation of Superheterojunction Polymers via Direct Polycondensation: Segregated and Bicontinuous Donor-Acceptor π-Columnar Arrays in Covalent Organic Frameworks for Long-Lived Charge Separation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 7817–7827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Haase, F.; Gottschling, K.; Stegbauer, L.; Germann, L.S.; Gutzler, R.; Duppel, V.; Vyas, V.S.; Kern, K.; Dinnebier, R.E.; Lotsch, B. V Tuning the stacking behaviour of a 2D covalent organic framework through non-covalent interactions. Mater. Chem. Front. 2017, 1, 1354–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Pütz, A.M.; Terban, M.W.; Bette, S.; Haase, F.; Dinnebier, R.E.; Lotsch, B. V Total scattering reveals the hidden stacking disorder in a 2D covalent organic framework. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 12647–12654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Castet, F.; D’Avino, G.; Muccioli, L.; Cornil, J.; Beljonne, D. Charge separation energetics at organic heterojunctions: On the role of structural and electrostatic disorder. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 20279–20290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Li, H.; Shao, P.; Chen, S.; Li, G.; Feng, X.; Chen, X.; Zhang, H.-J.; Lin, J.; Jiang, Y.-B. Supramolecular Alternating Donor–Acceptor Assembly toward Intercalated Covalent Organic Frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 3712–3717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Chen, X.; Addicoat, M.; Irle, S.; Nagai, A.; Jiang, D. Control of Crystallinity and Porosity of Covalent Organic Frameworks by Managing Interlayer Interactions Based on Self-Complementary π-Electronic Force. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 546–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Qian, C.; Qi, Q.Y.; Jiang, G.F.; Cui, F.Z.; Tian, Y.; Zhao, X. Toward Covalent Organic Frameworks Bearing Three Different Kinds of Pores: The Strategy for Construction and COF-to-COF Transformation via Heterogeneous Linker Exchange. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 6736–6743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Huang, N.; Zhai, L.; Coupry, D.E.; Addicoat, M.A.; Okushita, K.; Nishimura, K.; Heine, T.; Jiang, D. Multiple-component covalent organic frameworks. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Banerjee, T.; Haase, F.; Trenker, S.; Biswal, B.P.; Savasci, G.; Duppel, V.; Moudrakovski, I.; Ochsenfeld, C.; Lotsch, B.V. Sub-stoichiometric 2D covalent organic frameworks from tri- and tetratopic linkers. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  109. Li, R.L.; Yang, A.; Flanders, N.C.; Yeung, M.T.; Sheppard, D.T.; Dichtel, W.R. Two-Dimensional Covalent Organic Framework Solid Solutions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 7081–7087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Stassin, T.; Verbeke, R.; Cruz, A.J.; Rodríguez-Hermida, S.; Stassen, I.; Marreiros, J.; Krishtab, M.; Dickmann, M.; Egger, W.; Vankelecom, I.F.J.; et al. Porosimetry for Thin Films of Metal–Organic Frameworks: A Comparison of Positron Annihilation Lifetime Spectroscopy and Adsorption-Based Methods. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2006993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Winkler, C.; Kamencek, T.; Zojer, E. Understanding the origin of serrated stacking motifs in planar two-dimensional covalent organic frameworks. Nanoscale 2021, 13, 9339–9353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Osterrieth, J.; Rampersad, J.; Madden, D.G.; Rampal, N.; Skoric, L.; Connolly, B.; Allendorf, M.; Stavila, V.; SNIDER, J.; Ameloot, R. How Reproducible Are Surface Areas Calculated from the BET Equation? ChemRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Examples of different reactive groups which allow DCC for COF formation and corresponding connecting moieties; (A) boroxine [24], (B) boronate ester [24], (C) triazine [25], (D) hydrazone [26], (E) vinylene with triazine [27,28], (F) imine [29], (G) full vinylene C-C bonded [30,31] (see the following references for full structures).
Figure 1. Examples of different reactive groups which allow DCC for COF formation and corresponding connecting moieties; (A) boroxine [24], (B) boronate ester [24], (C) triazine [25], (D) hydrazone [26], (E) vinylene with triazine [27,28], (F) imine [29], (G) full vinylene C-C bonded [30,31] (see the following references for full structures).
Crystals 11 00762 g001
Figure 2. Illustration of the films formed from linear and porous polymers, and the comparison of their interaction with the guests or analytes after exposure.
Figure 2. Illustration of the films formed from linear and porous polymers, and the comparison of their interaction with the guests or analytes after exposure.
Crystals 11 00762 g002
Figure 3. (A) Schematic description of vapor-assisted conversion of monomer film to COF film and (B) the pictures of monomer film and COF film (reproduced from Ref. [55] with permission CCS Chemistry).
Figure 3. (A) Schematic description of vapor-assisted conversion of monomer film to COF film and (B) the pictures of monomer film and COF film (reproduced from Ref. [55] with permission CCS Chemistry).
Crystals 11 00762 g003
Figure 4. COF film formation via liquid-liquid interface method (Reproduced from Ref. [64] with the permission from American Chemical Society).
Figure 4. COF film formation via liquid-liquid interface method (Reproduced from Ref. [64] with the permission from American Chemical Society).
Crystals 11 00762 g004
Figure 5. Electrophoretic deposition of COF particles on substrates (reproduced from Ref. [72] with permission from American Chemical Society).
Figure 5. Electrophoretic deposition of COF particles on substrates (reproduced from Ref. [72] with permission from American Chemical Society).
Crystals 11 00762 g005
Figure 6. Donor-Acceptor COF structures: (A) Eclipsed donor-acceptor stackings of common COFs and their perfectly separated bicontinuous electron-hole columns (reproduced from Ref. [100] with permission from American Chemical Society) (B) Electron poor COF sheets intercalated with electron-donating moieties (acceptor = blue, crosslinker = gray, donor = red, reproduced from Ref. [104] with permission from American Chemical Society).
Figure 6. Donor-Acceptor COF structures: (A) Eclipsed donor-acceptor stackings of common COFs and their perfectly separated bicontinuous electron-hole columns (reproduced from Ref. [100] with permission from American Chemical Society) (B) Electron poor COF sheets intercalated with electron-donating moieties (acceptor = blue, crosslinker = gray, donor = red, reproduced from Ref. [104] with permission from American Chemical Society).
Crystals 11 00762 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bildirir, H. Have Covalent Organic Framework Films Revealed Their Full Potential? Crystals 2021, 11, 762. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11070762

AMA Style

Bildirir H. Have Covalent Organic Framework Films Revealed Their Full Potential? Crystals. 2021; 11(7):762. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11070762

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bildirir, Hakan. 2021. "Have Covalent Organic Framework Films Revealed Their Full Potential?" Crystals 11, no. 7: 762. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11070762

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop