Next Article in Journal
Fully Transparent Amorphous Ga2O3-Based Solar-Blind Ultraviolet Photodetector with Graphitic Carbon Electrodes
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effect of the Degree of Polymerization and Polymer Composition on the Temperature Responsiveness of Cholesteric Semi-Interpenetrating Networks
Previous Article in Journal
Calcium Carbonate Crystallization on a Microalgal Matrix: The Effects of Heavy Metal Presence
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Crystals
Volume 12
Issue 10
10.3390/cryst12101426
crystals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Progress on Preparation Strategies of Liquid Crystal Smart Windows

by
Linfeng Luo
1,
Yinghui Liang
1,
Yuting Feng
1,
Dan Mo
1,*,
Yang Zhang
2,* and
Jiawen Chen
2
1
School of Chemistry, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China
2
SCNU-UG International Joint Laboratory of Molecular Science and Displays, National Center for International Research on Green Optoelectronics, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2022, 12(10), 1426; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12101426
Submission received: 16 September 2022 / Revised: 30 September 2022 / Accepted: 3 October 2022 / Published: 9 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Responsive Liquid Crystal Polymer)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Liquid crystal (LC) smart windows that are able to regulate natural light by changing the optical transmittance in response to external stimulus have become an effective way to reduce building energy consumption. The rapid development of technology has brought out a variety of responsive smart windows suitable for daily life, including electrical-, thermal-, and photo-responsive ones. In this review, the recent progress in LC smart windows that switch between transparent and opaque states by different stimuli is overviewed. The preparation strategies for single-/dual-responsive smart windows are outlined, exclusively concentrating on the functional design and working principle. Furthermore, the advantages and current drawbacks of smart windows for each response mode are briefly described. Finally, a perspective on the direction of future responsive LC smart windows is discussed.

1. Introduction

In developed countries, energy used in residential buildings accounts for up to 40% of energy consumption, which has surpassed the energy consumed by industry and transportation [1,2]. Among all building components, windows are usually reckoned as the most energy-wasting part [3,4]. Nevertheless, the proportion of window space in buildings has been growing as a result of modern architectural aesthetics and human needs [5,6]. Smart windows, windows that can dynamically adjust light transmittance on demand, have been considered an extremely crucial and promising technology to economize building energy consumption by controlling the indoor light environment [7,8,9,10]. Smart windows are gaining immense popularity as they can maintain the building temperature and improve personal comfort in a novel and exciting way.
Smart windows have already attracted research interest from academia and industry, originating from the enormous commercial market and achieving the incredible development of smart energy-efficient buildings [11,12,13]. According to a Globe Newswire report [14], in 2021, the global smart windows market is valued at $960 million and is expected to roughly triple to $2259.7 million by 2027, demonstrating a compound annual growth rate of almost 14.9% during 2022–2027. Compared with traditional windows, smart windows are able to realize the management of natural daylight by themselves, which is considered a more efficient choice for managing energy [15,16,17]. Especially, smart windows are incorporated with lighting and air conditioning control systems, to further create a comfortable living environment [18,19].
To date, there are different materials available for the manufacturing of smart windows, including electrochromic materials [20,21], thermochromic materials [22,23], phase changing materials [24,25], suspended particle [26,27], hydrogel [8,28], and perovskites [29,30]. Among them, liquid crystal (LC), due to its inherent responsive properties [31,32], is one of the most attractive materials for smart windows. The studies of LC smart windows have been largely developed in the past few decades, and several LC smart windows are already hitting the market [18,33,34]. In particular, LC smart windows which switch between transparent and opaque states can be used not only for building energy conservation, but also as a functional device in private spaces, sunroofs of cars, portholes of airplanes, greenhouses, and augmented reality displays [35,36,37,38,39].
In this review, the research progress of LC smart windows that switch between transparent and opaque states is overviewed, from the electrical-, thermal-, and photo-responsive approaches. We outline the distinct mechanisms of each stimulus and systematically present the preparation strategies for various types of smart windows. Additionally, recent achievements of dual-responsive LC smart windows are summarized, including thermal-/electrical- and thermal-/photo-responsive smart windows. Lastly, the aim of this review is to broaden research interests and enlighten further innovative approaches to prompt the development of multi-responsive smart windows that meet human needs.

2. Single-Responsive Liquid Crystal Smart Windows

LC is a stimuli-responsive material. It is characterized by the anisotropy of dielectric, optical, and mechanical properties [40,41,42]. These properties are responsive to a range of stimuli, including the electric field, temperature, light, etc., which make LCs suitable for application in the field of smart windows [43,44]. Single-responsive LC smart window refers to a smart window that dynamically modulates light transmittance solely by one external stimulus, typically referring to electrical-, thermal-, or photo-responsive approaches.

2.1. Electrical-Responsive Liquid Crystal Smart Windows

An electrical-responsive LC (ERLC) smart window is an active smart window that can be adjusted according to people’s desires [45]. In general, an ERLC smart window is a component consisting of the LC mixture sandwiched between two transparent conductive electrodes that regulates the optical properties by the absence/presence of an electric field [17,46]. Unlike typical electrochromic smart windows, ERLC smart windows commonly switch between the transparent and opaque states through light scattering by electrically controlled reorientation of the LC director [47]. Therefore, the response time is relatively short (~ms), and the ERLC smart window gets more attention and is rapidly commercialized [48,49]. Here, we introduce several strategies for producing ERLC smart windows and elaborate on each working mechanism in detail.
It is a simple way to realize light management by taking advantage of electrohydrodynamic instability (EHDI) in LCs [50,51]. Doping the nematic LCs (NLCs) with a suitable species of ions has proven to be a very practical way to achieve the dynamic scattering phenomenon [52]. Under the action of the alignment layer, LC mixtures are aligned in the same direction, and the pattern behind the device is visible. When applying the electric field, the movement of ions generates the vortex, and the LCs director disorder, resulting in a strong light scattering (Figure 1a,b). Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) cationic surfactant is a commonly used ionic material. In recent years, the charge-neutral zwitterion molecules with multiple ionic groups have become better options. It has been shown that the use of zwitterion molecules can further improve the long-term stability of EHDI smart windows [53,54]. In addition to NLCs, doping the ion materials into the cholesteric liquid crystals (CLCs) or smectic liquid crystals (SmLCs) can be another practical approach for fabricating bistable smart windows, which has attracted intense attention due to the low energy consumption [55,56,57]. As shown in Figure 1c, in the absence of an electric field, the helical axis of CLCs is aligned orthogonally to the substrate through the anchoring force by the homogenous alignment, exhibiting a planar state. When a low-frequency voltage is applied, ions move freely, and the window switches from planar texture to focal conic (FC) texture, which scatters incident light in random directions and leads to the scattering state, and CLCs will maintain the metastable FC state without applied fields. When the high-frequency voltage is applied, the ions inside barely move, therefore, the negative dielectric CLCs respond to the electric field and self-assemble to a planar state, and the window returns to the initial transparent state (Figure 1d) [58].
Another popular ERLC smart window is based on the polymer/LCs composite system. Polymer dispersed liquid crystal (PDLC) is the most well-known representative [59,60]. During PDLC preparation, low-molar-mass LCs are usually not soluble in the polymer network, phase separation happens, and thus the nano- or micrometer size LC droplets are embedded in a continuous polymer matrix. PDLC shows a milky scattering state due to the refractive index mismatch between the LCs and polymer in the initial state. Under the applied sufficient voltage, LC director aligns in the direction of the field, resulting in the loss of the refractive index mismatch, and therefore allowing the incident light to pass through (Figure 2a) [61,62]. However, PDLC usually shows a fuzzy state when the electric field is not applied because the polymer matrix lacks the LC orientation control, which is unsuitable for traditional buildings. In addition, the amount of polymer content is higher than 40 wt.%, and a higher working voltage (~100 V) is required to achieve the transparent state [63]. To solve these problems, polymer stabilized liquid crystal (PSLC), which can switch between transparent and scattering states by removing and applying an electric field, has become an alternative to PDLC [36]. In the OFF state, thanks to the alignment layer on both sides of the substrate, LCs and the polymer network are aligned in the same direction. In this case, the LC effective index matches that of the polymer matrix, and PSLC shows a clear state. When the voltage is applied, LCs are reoriented in response to the field. As the polymer network hinders the rotation of LCs, a multi-domain is formed, which results in the difference in the refractive index, and the incident light can be strongly scattered (Figure 2b) [64,65]. As there is a smaller quantity of LC polymer network (<10 wt.%) in PSLC, the working voltage is relatively low (~30 V). Besides, it is worth mentioning that Yang’s group has developed a novel coexistent system of polymer dispersed and polymer stabilized liquid crystal (PD&SLC) in response to the problem of high working voltage of PDLC [66,67]. Taking advantage of the difference in polymerization rates of non-liquid crystalline monomers and liquid crystalline monomers, they constructed a unique system in which the homeotropically polymer network structure of PSLC is randomly distributed in each cavity of the porous polymer matrix of PDLC (Figure 2c). The interactions between the homeotropically polymer network and LCs can effectively reduce the confinements from the porous polymer matrix (Figure 2d), thereby reducing the working voltage (~35 V, Figure 2e) [68]. Moreover, many studies have been focused on ways to further enhance the functionalities of polymer/LCs composite ERLC smart windows, such as liquid crystal type (CLCs, SmLCs, dual-frequency LCs) [69,70], chemical structure of monomers [71], polymerization type [72,73], doping nanomaterials [74,75], etc. Take the doping of nanoparticles in PDLC as an example. Some metal nanoparticles (ZnO, CuO, Fe3O4, TiO2, etc.) can reduce the driving voltage of PDLC due to the fact that nanoparticles can affect the dielectric constant of LCs or create the local field effects. Especially Ag nanoparticles, with which the surface plasmon excitations at metal–LC interfaces increase the local electric fields, and the driving voltage of PDLC drops from 77 V to 40 V [63].

2.2. Thermal-Responsive Liquid Crystal Smart Windows

Thermal-responsive LC (TRLC) smart windows use LC materials whose properties change when the temperature reaches a critical value transition temperature [76]. The TRLC smart window mechanism is generally considered to be a passive way without any additional control system, and the windows can adaptively adjust the light transmittance according to the ambient temperature. Therefore, TRLC smart windows are one of the most attractive options for energy-efficient buildings.
Exploiting the reversible phase transition properties of LCs is the most used method for preparing TRLC smart windows, especially the reversible phase transition between the smectic A (SmA) and the chiral nematic phases [77]. Sun et al. constructed a PSLC film based on the above characteristic [78]. Within the temperature range of the SmA, the device presents a strong light-scattering state resulting from the FC domains caused by the interaction between the elastic force of the polymer network and the self-configuration of SmA. When the temperature is higher than 35.5 °C (chiral nematic phase), due to the anchoring effects of the planar alignment layers and the crosslinked polymer network, the device shows a transparent state (Figure 3a,b). To improve the shear strength of the above film and solve the problem that the film is hazy around room temperature, a PD&SLC film was developed [79]. By introducing the PDLC system, the maximum shear strength of the film is increased by nearly 30 times. At room temperature (25 °C), the SmA LC molecules are oriented perpendicular to the surface of the substrate because of the anchoring of the homeotropically aligned polymer network, and the film shows a clear state. When the film is heated to a higher temperature into the chiral nematic phase, LC molecules rearrange to form the FC texture, and the film exhibits an opaque state (Figure 3c,d). Theoretically, the more phase transitions of LCs are fully utilized, the more the effectiveness of TRLC smart windows will be obtained. Oh et al. have reported on smart windows with three switching states through the smectic-nematic-isotropic phase transition (Figure 3e,f) [80]. In the SmA phase, LCs and black dichroic dye molecules are homeotropically aligned due to the orientation force of the alignment layer, the light absorption and scattering are minimized, and the pattern behind the device is visible. When the temperature is increased to 31 °C, LCs transfer to the chiral nematic phase and form the FC domain, and the synergistic effect of black dyes and LC molecules enhance the absorption. The film simultaneously produces the scattering state and deep black color, showing a high-haze opaque state, and the transmittance is only 4.3% (Figure 3g). With further increase in the temperature to the isotropic phase, the light scattering disappears, the transmittance is slightly higher (19.4%), and the film presents a haze-free opaque state.

2.3. Photo-Responsive Liquid Crystal Smart Windows

Light is clean and renewable energy. It is fascinating to use light to manage the change of transmittance of smart windows [81]. Commonly, a photo-responsive LC (PRLC) smart window is produced by doping photo-responsive materials to LC mixtures [82]. Similar to TRLC smart windows, PRLC smart windows are also considered cost-effective, stimuli-rational, and energy-efficient for their simple structures, passive light modulations, and zero-energy input characteristics.
Azobenzene derivatives are some of the most used photo-responsive materials for preparing the PRLC smart windows [83,84]. In the initial state, the azobenzene chiral dopant induces LCs to form CLCs, and the window scatters the incident light through the FC state. By exposing to ultraviolet (UV) light in a specific switching temperature range, photoisomerization of azobenzene reduces the order parameter of LCs, the window switches from FC state to isotropic state, and becomes transparent (Figure 4b,c) [85]. Once the UV light is removed, the push-pull azobenzene (2-(4-hydroxyphenylazo)benzoic) acid (HABA) has the advantage of quick thermal relaxation (Figure 4a), and the window can return to the opaque state immediately [84]. To develop an original transparent PRLC smart window, Talukder et al. has developed a clever approach to using an azobenzene dimmer PSC−01, whose helical twist powers (HTP) of trans and cis states are 64.18 μm−1 and 16.31 μm−1, respectively, as shown in Figure 4d [86]. In the initial homeotropic alignment cell, another chiral dopant S811 was added in extra portion to counteract the HTP of trans-PSC−01 (right-handed), so LCs are aligned perpendicular to the substrate in the unwound state, and the absorption of black dye is minimal (Figure 4e,f). When the cell is exposed to UV light, the trans-cis photoisomerization of azobenzene takes place and the HTP changes. Thus, left-handed CLCs are generated and enter the FC state, and the cell turns into a dark opaque state. Further, using visible light or heating, the LCs will require reversal from FC state to homeotropic state. Besides, overcrowded alkenes molecular motor is another promising photo-responsive molecule [87]. The repeated rotation of the molecular motor is based on the carbon-carbon double bond between the upper half rotor and the lower half stator which serves as an axis (Figure 4g). Doping the molecular motor as a chiral dopant to LCs, CLCs form and show a planar texture under the boundary condition imposed by the planar alignment, the helical axis of CLCs is homogeneously aligned perpendicular to the substrate, and the device shows a transparent state. Upon the UV irradiation, the molecular motor switches from a stable state to an unstable state, and the HTP is changed. A large number of defects and disclinations are generated between LC domains and the free energy density increases with the HTP change, causing a light-scattering state due to the FC state, and a milky star pattern appears on the smart window by photomask (Figure 4h,i).
Apart from the photo-isomerized materials, the photothermal materials that change the LC phase are a practical strategy for preparing PRLC smart windows [82,88]. Meng et al. have reported a photothermal material isobutyl-substituted diammonium borate (IDI), which is transparent in the visible area with a light brown color and good compatibility with LCs (Figure 4j). On a cloudy day, the high transparency of the window is obtained based on the chiral SmLC uniform perpendicular to the surface, and light can easily pass through the windows. On sunny days (over 100 mW/cm2), IDI converts light to heat causing the chiral SmLC to enter the CLC phase, CLCs exhibit an FC state by the helical torque force from the chiral dopant R5011, so the window becomes opaque and reduces the light entrance of the room (Figure 4k,j) [88].

2.4. Chapter Summary

Recent preparation strategies for single-responsive LC smart windows are covered in this section. Stimulus-responsive LC smart windows have their own pros and cons.
ERLC smart windows can switch states at any time according to the user’s requirements, making it the first choice for commercialization. However, the high working voltage and complicated preparation process are the major disadvantages, and efforts are still needed for improving ERLC smart windows considering the cost-effectiveness and reliability. TRLC smart windows have developed rapidly in the past few years and relying on the ambient temperature to adjust the indoor light is their highlight. It is a meaningful direction to seek LC material systems that can undergo phase transition changes in a suitable room temperature range, taking into account a diversiform latitude environment. The PRLC smart window is another potential passive smart window. The most crucial point is to solve the problem of photo-responsive material by itself with light color.

3. Dual-Responsive Liquid Crystal Smart Windows

There has been exciting attention to multi-responsive LC smart windows that integrate various driven methods for future applications [89]. A dual-responsive LC smart window is a window that realizes switching states (transparent and opaque states) through two independent stimuli, such as temperature and electric field or temperature and light.

3.1. Thermal-/Electrical-Responsive Liquid Crystal Smart Windows

If a system can achieve both TR and ER, then it has the potential to realize thermal-/electrical-responsive LC (TR/ER LC) smart windows. PD&SLC is a good example [79,90]. Utilizing the polymer network structure of PD&SLC, and LC materials with SmA-N phase transition, a dual-responsive window can be obtained (Figure 5a) [91]. SmA LCs are homeotropically aligned at room temperature due to the formation of the vertical polymer network structure, and the film is transparent as a result of the perfectly matched refractive index. When the temperature is higher than the SmA-N phase transition, the temperature induces the formation of CLC and achieves an FC texture. The film exhibits a light-scattering state (Figure 5b). Moreover, the scattering film can still be powered electrically, as Section 2.1 mentioned (Figure 5c). Another excellent strategy for preparing TR/ER LC smart windows has been proposed by Sung et al. [92] A suitable concentration of chiral dopant S811 was added to the negative dielectric LC to form a CLCs phase. Because of the impurity ions of LCs and chiral dopant, the EHDI effect can drive the device away from the naturally planar state to a dynamic scattering state by applying a certain voltage and frequency (Figure 5d), and the transmittance decreases (Figure 5e). In the instance of temperature control, the author found that EHDI production is temperature dependent, the threshold electric field can be decreased by increasing the cell temperature, and the EHDI smart window can be controlled by the temperature (Figure 5d). More importantly, at different temperatures, the switching state corresponds to various voltages (Figure 5f), which benefits human inhabitants at all latitudes.

3.2. Thermal-/Photo-Responsive Liquid Crystal Smart Windows

Incorporation of photo-responsive chiral dopants into LCs with the SmA-N phase transition is the most straightforward strategy for fabricating thermal-/photo-responsive liquid crystal (TR/PR LC) smart windows (Figure 6a) [93]. The working principle of azobenzene materials as a chiral dopant in TR and PR LC smart windows is described in Section 2.2 and Section 2.3, respectively, and will not be repeated here. Furthermore, photo-responsive materials are not only used as the chiral dopant, but also can be grafted as a functional group in polymer for alignment layers [94]. A dual-responsive homeotropic alignment PSLC was produced by copolymer MAzo-co-GMA and LCs with phase transition (Figure 6b). As mentioned above, the TR mode mainly depends on the phase changing of LCs. In PR mode, the PSLC shows a transparent state due to the MAzo-co-GMA homeotropic alignment layer without irradiation. Turning on the UV light (365 nm), the photo-isomerization of the azobenzene group takes place, and the azobenzene group produces a photothermal effect as well. The photothermal effect dominates, causing the LCs to undergo a phase transition, and the smart window switches from a transparent state to an opaque state (Figure 6c).

3.3. Chapter Summary

The recent advances in the preparation of dual-responsive LC smart windows have been reported, covering the last 2–4 years. While the current techniques are far from mature, these works are indeed inspiring. In general, dual-response smart windows and single-response windows complement each other, and the fabrication methods are more dependent on the technological development of single-response smart windows. Therefore, it is urgent to develop more single-response preparation strategies.

4. Conclusions

The review mainly summarizes the recent progress of LC smart windows switching between transparent and opaque states for electrical-, thermal-, and photo-responsive ones. We describe the preparation strategies and working mechanisms for each category focusing on single- and dual-responsive techniques. A brief comparison between these LC smart windows is presented in Table 1.
Smart windows, which aim to achieve carbon neutrality and high-efficiency energy-saving buildings, still face many challenges and opportunities in future development. Obviously, a multi-responsive smart window is superior to a single-responsive smart window in functionality and practicality. However, single-responsive smart window preparation technology is the driving force behind the development of dual-responsive smart windows. Therefore, how to promote the development of single-responsive smart window technology is the fundamental problem. In terms of materials, it is meaningful to further explore new LC materials and optimize existing material systems. Improving the dielectric properties of LCs enables ERLC smart windows to have a lower driving voltage; introducing photo-responsive groups into LC molecules can form photo-driven LC materials while maintaining liquid crystalline. Material changes will enrich fabrication strategies. As for preparation techniques, on the one hand, we need to carry out novel preparation methods to improve the production toolbox, and on the other hand, future smart windows should be integrated with various response modes and continue to break the boundaries between each simulation mode, to form a smart window that better suits personal demand.
In short, we provide an up-to-date overview of smart windows and promote the development of preparation strategies through this review. Smart windows will have the opportunity to enter thousands of households in the near future.

Author Contributions

Literature collection and organization: L.L., Y.L., Y.F. and Y.Z.; writing—original draft: L.L., Y.L., Y.F. and D.M.; writing—review and editing: Y.Z. and J.C.; funding acquisition: J.C. and Y.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported financially by the National Key R&D Program of China (2020YFE0100200), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21805095), the Department of Science and Technology of Guangdong Province (Nos. 2019050001 and 2021A0505030062), the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou (No. 2019050001), and the South China Normal University Scientific Research Cultivation Funding (No. 21KJ06).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kammen, D.M.; Sunter, D.A. City-integrated renewable energy for urban sustainability. Science 2016, 352, 922–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Rezaei, S.D.; Shannigrahi, S.; Ramakrishna, S. A review of conventional, advanced, and smart glazing technologies and materials for improving indoor environment. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2017, 159, 26–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tarantini, M.; Loprieno, A.D.; Porta, P.L. A life cycle approach to Green Public Procurement of building materials and elements: A case study on windows. Energy 2011, 36, 2473–2482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. De Gastines, M.; Pattini, A.E. Window energy efficiency in Argentina-Determining factors and energy savings strategies. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 247, 119104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Al-Ashwal, N.T.; Budaiwi, I.M.; Hassan, A. An approach to select ideal window area in office buildings: Modeling and simulation. Am. Trans. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2014, 3, 101–114. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zou, Y.; Xiang, K.; Zhan, Q.; Li, Z. A simulation-based method to predict the life cycle energy performance of residential buildings in different climate zones of China. Build. Environ. 2021, 193, 107663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Aburas, M.; Soebarto, V.; Williamson, T.; Liang, R.; Ebendorff-Heidepriem, H.; Wu, Y. Thermochromic smart window technologies for building application: A review. Appl. Energy 2019, 255, 113522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhou, Y.; Wang, S.; Peng, J.; Tan, Y.; Li, C.; Boey, F.Y.C.; Long, Y. Liquid thermo-responsive smart window derived from hydrogel. Joule 2020, 4, 2458–2474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sun, Z.; Xie, X.; Xu, W.; Chen, K.; Liu, Y.; Chu, X.; Niu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Ren, C. Chameleon-inspired energy-saving smart window responding to natural weather. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 12949–12959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liang, X.; Chen, M.; Wang, Q.; Guo, S.; Zhang, L.; Yang, H. Active and passive modulation of solar light transmittance in a hybrid thermochromic soft-matter system for energy-saving smart window applications. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 7054–7062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cui, Y.; Ke, Y.; Liu, C.; Chen, Z.; Wang, N.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, S.; Gao, Y.; Long, Y. Thermochromic VO2 for energy-efficient smart windows. Joule 2018, 2, 1707–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Strand, M.T.; Hernandez, T.S.; Danner, M.G.; Yeang, A.L.; Jarvey, N.; Barile, C.J.; McGehee, M.D. Polymer inhibitors enable >900 cm2 dynamic windows based on reversible metal electrodeposition with high solar modulation. Nat. Energy 2021, 6, 546–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chowdhary, A.K.; Sikdar, D. Nanophotonic all-weather windows for energy-efficient smart buildings. In CLEO: Applications and Technology; Optica Publishing Group: Washington, DC, USA, 2021; p. JW1A-75. [Google Scholar]
  14. Insights on the Smart Window Global Market to 2027—By Technology, Type, Application and Region. Available online: https://www.globenewswire.com/en/news-release/2022/04/08/2419186/28124/en/Insights-on-the-Smart-Window-Global-Market-to-2027-by-Technology-Type-Application-and-Region.html (accessed on 15 September 2022).
  15. Kang, S.K.; Ho, D.H.; Lee, C.H.; Lim, H.S.; Cho, J.H. Actively operable thermoresponsive smart windows for reducing energy consumption. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 33838–33845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, S.; Jiang, T.; Meng, Y.; Yang, R.; Tan, G.; Long, Y. Scalable thermochromic smart windows with passive radiative cooling regulation. Science 2021, 374, 1501–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, C.C.; Tseng, H.Y.; Chen, C.W.; Wang, C.T.; Jau, H.C.; Wu, Y.C.; Hsu, W.H.; Lin, T.H. Versatile energy-saving smart glass based on tristable cholesteric liquid crystals. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2020, 3, 7601–7609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ruggiero, S.; De Masi, R.F.; Assimakopoulos, M.N.; Vanoli, G.P. Energy saving through building automation systems: Experimental and numerical study of a smart glass with liquid crystal and its control logics in summertime. Energy Build. 2022, 273, 112403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Park, D.Y.; Chang, S. Effects of combined central air conditioning diffusers and window-integrated ventilation system on indoor air quality and thermal comfort in an office. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 61, 102292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, K.; Meng, Q.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, W.; Guo, J.; Cao, S.; Elezzabi, A.Y.; Yu, W.W.; Liu, L.; Li, H. Advances in Energy-Efficient Plasmonic Electrochromic Smart Windows Based on Metal Oxide Nanocrystals. Adv. Energy Sustain. Res. 2021, 2, 2100117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, S.; Cao, S.; Zhang, T.; Lee, J.Y. Plasmonic oxygen-deficient TiO2-x nanocrystals for dual-band electrochromic smart windows with efficient energy recycling. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2004686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shen, N.; Chen, S.; Huang, R.; Huang, J.; Li, J.; Shi, R.; Niu, S.; Amini, A.; Cheng, C. Vanadium dioxide for thermochromic smart windows in ambient conditions. Mater. Today Energy 2021, 21, 100827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, S.; Zhou, Y.; Jiang, T.; Yang, R.; Tan, G.; Long, Y. Thermochromic smart windows with highly regulated radiative cooling and solar transmission. Nano Energy 2021, 89, 106440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ji, C.; Wu, Z.; Wu, X.; Wang, J.; Gou, J.; Huang, Z.; Zhou, H.; Yao, W.; Jiang, Y. Al-doped VO2 films as smart window coatings: Reduced phase transition temperature and improved thermochromic performance. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2018, 176, 174–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vu, T.D.; Chen, Z.; Zeng, X.; Jiang, M.; Liu, S.; Gao, Y.; Long, Y. Physical vapour deposition of vanadium dioxide for thermochromic smart window applications. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019, 7, 2121–2145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nundy, S.; Ghosh, A. Thermal and visual comfort analysis of adaptive vacuum integrated switchable suspended particle device window for temperate climate. Renew. Energy 2020, 156, 1361–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Huang, S.; Zhang, Q.; Li, P.; Ren, F.; Yurtsever, A.; Ma, D. High-performance suspended particle devices based on copper-reduced graphene oxide core–shell nanowire electrodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1703658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, H.; Liu, J.; Shi, F.; Li, T.; Zhang, H.; Yang, D.; Li, Y.; Tian, Z.; Zhou, N. A novel bidirectional fast self-responsive PVA-PNIPAM/LimCsnWO3 composite hydrogel for smart window applications. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 431, 133353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, S.; Du, Y.W.; Tso, C.Y.; Lee, H.H.; Cheng, R.; Feng, S.P.; Yu, K.M. Organic hybrid perovskite (MAPbI3-xClx) for thermochromic smart window with strong optical regulation ability, low transition temperature, and narrow hysteresis width. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2010426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, S.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yu, K.M.; Huang, B.; Tso, C.Y. Near-infrared-activated thermochromic perovskite smart windows. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, 2106090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nundy, S.; Mesloub, A.; Alsolami, B.M.; Ghosh, A. Electrically actuated visible and near-infrared regulating switchable smart window for energy positive building: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 301, 126854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, J.; Meng, C.; Wang, C.T.; Liu, C.H.; Chang, Y.H.; Li, C.C.; Tseng, H.Y.; Kwok, H.S.; Zi, Y. A fully self-powered, ultra-stable cholesteric smart window triggered by instantaneous mechanical stimuli. Nano Energy 2021, 85, 105976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hemaida, A.; Ghosh, A.; Sundaram, S.; Mallick, T.K. Simulation study for a switchable adaptive polymer dispersed liquid crystal smart window for two climate zones (Riyadh and London). Energy Build. 2021, 251, 111381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kim, D.-J.; Hwang, D.Y.; Park, J.-Y.; Kim, H.-K. Liquid crystal–based flexible smart windows on roll-to-roll slot die–coated Ag nanowire network films. J. Alloy. Compd. 2018, 765, 1090–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, Y.; Chen, J.; Hu, X.; Zhao, W.; Broer, D.; Zhou, G. Reverse mode polymer dispersed liquid crystal-based smart windows: A progress report. Recent Prog. Mater. 2021, 3, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Meng, C.; Tseng, M.C.; Tang, S.T.; Zhao, C.X.; Yeung, S.Y.; Kwok, H.S. Normally transparent smart window with haze enhancement via inhomogeneous alignment surface. Liq. Cryst. 2019, 46, 484–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, Y.; Wang, C.; Zhao, W.; Li, M.; Wang, X.; Yang, X.; Hu, X.; Yuan, D.; Yang, W.; Zhang, Y. Polymer stabilized liquid crystal smart window with flexible substrates based on low-temperature treatment of polyamide acid technology. Polymers 2019, 11, 1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Liu, S.; Li, Y.; Zhou, P.; Chen, Q.; Su, Y. Reverse-mode PSLC multi-plane optical see-through display for AR applications. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 3394–3403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Timmermans, G.H.; Hemming, S.; Baeza, E.; Van Thoor, E.A.; Schenning, A.P.; Debije, M.G. Advanced optical materials for sunlight control in greenhouses. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2020, 8, 2000738. [Google Scholar]
  40. White, T.J.; McConney, M.E.; Bunning, T.J. Dynamic color in stimuli-responsive cholesteric liquid crystals. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 9832–9847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mrinalini, M.; Prasanthkumar, S. Recent advances on stimuli-responsive smart materials and their applications. ChemPlusChem 2019, 84, 1103–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Bisoyi, H.K.; Li, Q. Liquid crystals: Versatile self-organized smart soft materials. Chem. Rev. 2021, 122, 4887–4926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yan, J.; Ota, F.; San Jose, B.A.; Akagi, K. Chiroptical resolution and thermal switching of chirality in conjugated polymer luminescence via selective reflection using a double-layered cell of chiral nematic liquid crystal. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1604529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liu, Q.; Smalyukh, I.I. Liquid crystalline cellulose-based nematogels. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1700981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Liu, H.; Guo, Z.H.; Xu, F.; Jia, L.; Pan, C.; Wang, Z.L.; Pu, X. Triboelectric-optical responsive cholesteric liquid crystals for self-powered smart window, E-paper display and optical switch. Sci. Bull. 2021, 66, 1986–1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cupelli, D.; Nicoletta, F.P.; Manfredi, S.; Vivacqua, M.; Formoso, P.; De Filpo, G.; Chidichimo, G. Self-adjusting smart windows based on polymer-dispersed liquid crystals. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2009, 93, 2008–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yoon, W.J.; Choi, Y.J.; Lim, S.I.; Koo, J.; Yang, S.; Jung, D.; Kang, S.W.; Jeong, K.U. A single-step dual stabilization of smart window by the formation of liquid crystal physical gels and the construction of liquid crystal chambers. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1906780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Miao, Z.; Jia, M.; Wang, D. Exploration of nanofibre/nanoparticle/PDLC composite system. Liq. Cryst. 2022, 17, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pagidi, S.; Manda, R.; Bhattacharyya, S.S.; Lee, S.G.; Song, S.M.; Lim, Y.J.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, S.H. Fast switchable micro-lenticular lens arrays using highly transparent nano-polymer dispersed liquid crystals. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 6, 1900841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Williams, R. Domains in liquid crystals. J. Chem. Phys. 1963, 39, 384–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhan, Y.; Schenning, A.P.; Broer, D.J.; Zhou, G.; Liu, D. Light-driven electrohydrodynamic instabilities in liquid crystals. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1707436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Shaban, H.; Wu, P.C.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, W. Dielectric and electro-optical responses of a dielectrically negative nematic liquid crystal doped with cationic surfactant. Opt. Mater. Express 2021, 11, 3208–3222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhan, Y.; Lu, H.; Jin, M.; Zhou, G. Electrohydrodynamic instabilities for smart window applications. Liq. Cryst. 2020, 47, 977–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhang, Y.; Yang, X.; Zhan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; He, J.; Lv, P.; Yuan, D.; Hu, X.; Liu, D.; Broer, D.J. Electroconvection in zwitterion-doped nematic liquid crystals and application as smart windows. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2021, 9, 2001465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chen, C.-W.; Brigeman, A.N.; Ho, T.-J.; Khoo, I.C. Normally transparent smart window based on electrically induced instability in dielectrically negative cholesteric liquid crystal. Opt. Mater. Express 2018, 8, 691–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mrukiewicz, M.; Perkowski, P.; Urbańska, M.; Węgłowska, D.; Piecek, W. Electrical conductivity of ion-doped fluoro substituted liquid crystal compounds for application in the dynamic light scattering effect. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 317, 113810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Guo, S.; Liang, X.; Wang, M.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, L.; Yang, H. Periodic electro-optical characteristics of ion-doped smectic A phase liquid crystals driven by a low-frequency electric field. Liq. Cryst. 2019, 46, 905–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lan, Z.; Li, Y.; Dai, H.; Luo, D. Bistable smart window based on ionic liquid doped cholesteric liquid crystal. IEEE Photonics J. 2017, 9, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mathew, V.; Kurian, C.P.; Augustine, N. Spectral, visual, thermal, energy and circadian assessment of PDLC glazing in warm and humid climate. Sol. Energy 2022, 241, 576–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mesloub, A.; Ghosh, A.; Kolsi, L.; Alshenaifi, M. Polymer-Dispersed Liquid Crystal (PDLC) smart switchable windows for less-energy hungry buildings and visual comfort in hot desert climate. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 59, 105101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Higgins, D.A. Probing the mesoscopic chemical and physical properties of polymer-dispersed liquid crystals. Adv. Mater. 2000, 12, 251–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Liao, C.C.; Su, C.W.; Chen, M.Y. Mitigation of image blurring for performance enhancement in transparent displays based on polymer-dispersed liquid crystal. Displays 2019, 56, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Saeed, M.H.; Zhang, S.; Cao, Y.; Zhou, L.; Hu, J.; Muhammad, I.; Xiao, J.; Zhang, L.; Yang, H. Recent advances in the polymer dispersed liquid crystal composite and its applications. Molecules 2020, 25, 5510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Hu, X.; Zhang, X.; Yang, W.; Jiang, X.F.; Jiang, X.; de Haan, L.T.; Yuan, D.; Zhao, W.; Zheng, N.; Jin, M. Stable and scalable smart window based on polymer stabilized liquid crystals. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020, 137, 48917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhang, Y.; Yang, W.; Gu, M.; Wei, Q.; Lv, P.; Li, M.; Liu, D.; Zhao, W.; Broer, D.J.; Zhou, G. Versatile homeotropic liquid crystal alignment with tunable functionality prepared by one-step method. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 608, 2290–2297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Li, C.; Chen, M.; Zhang, L.; Shen, W.; Liang, X.; Wang, X.; Yang, H. An electrically light-transmittance-switchable film with a low driving voltage based on liquid crystal/polymer composites. Liq. Cryst. 2020, 47, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Liang, X.; Chen, M.; Guo, S.; Wang, X.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, L.; Yang, H. Programmable electro-optical performances in a dual-frequency liquid crystals/polymer composite system. Polymer 2018, 149, 164–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Guo, S.; Liang, X.; Zhang, H.; Shen, W.; Li, C.; Wang, X.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, L.; Yang, H. An electrically light-transmittance-controllable film with a low-driving voltage from a coexistent system of polymer-dispersed and polymer-stabilised cholesteric liquid crystals. Liq. Cryst. 2018, 45, 1854–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ranjkesh, A.; Yoon, T.H. Thermal and electrical wavelength tuning of Bragg reflection with ultraviolet light absorbers in polymer-stabilized cholesteric liquid crystals. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 12377–12385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Du, X.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, F.; Luo, D. Electrically switchable bistable dual frequency liquid crystal light shutter with hyper-reflection in near infrared. Liq. Cryst. 2019, 46, 1727–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhang, D.; Cao, H.; Duan, M.; Wang, H.; Chen, Y.; Zong, C.; Gan, P.; Zhao, L.; Yang, Z.; Wang, D. Effect of monomer composition on the performance of polymer-stabilized liquid crystals with two-step photopolymerization. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 2019, 57, 1126–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Chen, G.; Hu, J.; Xu, J.; Sun, J.; Xiao, J.; Zhang, L.; Wang, X.; Hu, W.; Yang, H. Liquid crystalline composite stabilized by epoxy polymer with boscage-like morphology for energy-efficient smart windows with high stability. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2022, 307, 2100991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Shi, Z.; Shao, L.; Wang, F.; Deng, F.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y. Fabrication of dye-doped polymer-dispersed liquid crystals with low driving voltage based on nucleophile-initiated thiol-ene click reaction. Liq. Cryst. 2018, 45, 579–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Jinqian, L.; Zhao, Y.; Gao, H.; Wang, D.; Miao, Z.; Cao, H.; Yang, Z.; He, W. Polymer dispersed liquid crystals doped with CeO2 nanoparticles for the smart window. Liq. Cryst. 2022, 49, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, R.; Xu, L.; Li, J.; Yang, L.; Yang, Y.; Bolshakov, A.; Zhu, J. Visible and infrared optical modulation of PSLC smart films doped with ATO nanoparticles. Dalton Trans. 2021, 50, 10033–10040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ke, Y.; Zhou, C.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, S.; Chan, S.H.; Long, Y. Emerging thermal-responsive materials and integrated techniques targeting the energy-efficient smart window application. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1800113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zhang, W.; Froyen, A.A.; Schenning, A.P.; Zhou, G.; Debije, M.G.; de Haan, L.T. Temperature-responsive photonic devices based on cholesteric liquid crystals. Adv. Photonics Res. 2021, 2, 2100016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sun, J.; Wang, H.; Wang, L.; Cao, H.; Xie, H.; Luo, X.; Xiao, J.; Ding, H.; Yang, Z.; Yang, H. Preparation and thermo-optical characteristics of a smart polymer-stabilized liquid crystal thin film based on smectic A–chiral nematic phase transition. Smart Mater. Struct. 2014, 23, 125038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Guo, S.M.; Liang, X.; Zhang, C.H.; Chen, M.; Shen, C.; Zhang, L.Y.; Yuan, X.; He, B.F.; Yang, H. Preparation of a thermally light-transmittance-controllable film from a coexistent system of polymer-dispersed and polymer-stabilized liquid crystals. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 2942–2947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Oh, S.W.; Kim, S.H.; Yoon, T.H. Thermal control of transmission property by phase transition in cholesteric liquid crystals. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 6520–6525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Talukder, J.R.; Lee, Y.H.; Wu, S.T. Photo-responsive dye-doped liquid crystals for smart windows. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 4480–4487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Zou, X.; Ji, H.; Zhao, Y.; Lu, M.; Tao, J.; Tang, P.; Liu, B.; Yu, X.; Mao, Y. Research progress of photo-/electro-driven thermochromic smart windows. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 3335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Goda, K.; Omori, M.; Takatoh, K. Optical switching in guest–host liquid crystal devices driven by photo-and thermal isomerisation of azobenzene. Liq. Cryst. 2018, 45, 485–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Oh, S.W.; Nam, S.M.; Kim, S.H.; Yoon, T.H.; Kim, W.S. Self-regulation of infrared using a liquid crystal mixture doped with push–pull azobenzene for energy-saving smart windows. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 5028–5033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Oh, S.W.; Baek, J.M.; Kim, S.H.; Yoon, T.H. Optical and electrical switching of cholesteric liquid crystals containing azo dye. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 19497–19501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Talukder, J.R.; Lin, H.-Y.; Wu, S.-T. Photo-and electrical-responsive liquid crystal smart dimmer for augmented reality displays. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 18169–18179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Sun, J.; Lan, R.; Gao, Y.; Wang, M.; Zhang, W.; Wang, L.; Zhang, L.; Yang, Z.; Yang, H. Stimuli-directed dynamic reconfiguration in self-organized helical superstructures enabled by chemical kinetics of chiral molecular motors. Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1700613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Meng, W.; Gao, Y.; Hu, X.; Tan, L.; Li, L.; Zhou, G.; Yang, H.; Wang, J.; Jiang, L. Photothermal dual passively driven liquid crystal smart window. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 28301–28309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hwang, Y.J.; Pyun, S.B.; Choi, M.J.; Kim, J.H.; Cho, E.C. Multi-stimuli-responsive and multi-functional smart windows. ChemNanoMat 2022, 8, e202200005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Liang, X.; Chen, M.; Guo, S.; Zhang, L.; Li, F.; Yang, H. Dual-band modulation of visible and near-infrared light transmittance in an all-solution-processed hybrid micro–nano composite film. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 40810–40819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Liang, X.; Guo, S.; Chen, M.; Li, C.; Wang, Q.; Zou, C.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, L.; Guo, S.; Yang, H. A temperature and electric field-responsive flexible smart film with full broadband optical modulation. Mater. Horiz. 2017, 4, 878–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Sung, G.F.; Wu, P.C.; Zyryanov, V.Y.; Lee, W. Electrically active and thermally passive liquid-crystal device toward smart glass. Photonics Res. 2021, 9, 2288–2295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Oh, S.W.; Kim, S.H.; Baek, J.M.; Yoon, T.H. Optical and thermal switching of liquid crystals for self-shading windows. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 2018, 2, 1700164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kuang, Z.Y.; Deng, Y.; Hu, J.; Tao, L.; Wang, P.; Chen, J.; Xie, H.L. Responsive smart windows enabled by the azobenzene copolymer brush with photothermal effect. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 37026–37034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Crystals 12 01426 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Schematic diagrams and (b) image of the EHDI smart window based on the NLCs in the ON/OFF states [53]. (c) The operating principle of the bistable CLCs smart window. [58]. (d) The pictures and polarizing optical microscope (POM) images of EHDI smart window in scattering state and transparent state [58].
Figure 1. (a) Schematic diagrams and (b) image of the EHDI smart window based on the NLCs in the ON/OFF states [53]. (c) The operating principle of the bistable CLCs smart window. [58]. (d) The pictures and polarizing optical microscope (POM) images of EHDI smart window in scattering state and transparent state [58].
Crystals 12 01426 g001
Crystals 12 01426 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the working principle and image of (a) PDLC [62] and (b) PSLC [64] smart windows. (c) The schematic illustration for preparing the PD&SLC [68]. (d) Cross-sectional scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of PD&SLC polymer network [68]. (e) Photograph of PD&SLC in the OFF/ON states [68].
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the working principle and image of (a) PDLC [62] and (b) PSLC [64] smart windows. (c) The schematic illustration for preparing the PD&SLC [68]. (d) Cross-sectional scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of PD&SLC polymer network [68]. (e) Photograph of PD&SLC in the OFF/ON states [68].
Crystals 12 01426 g002
Crystals 12 01426 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) DSC curve of the nCB/SLC-1717 mixtures [78]. (b) Schematic representation of the working principle and images of the PSLC film in the cooling/heating states [78]. (c) DSC curve of the SmA-LC/SLC-1717/S811 mixtures [79]. (d) Schematic diagrams and images of the PD&SLC film in the cooling/heating states [79]. (e) DSC curve of the 8CB/S811 mixtures [80]. (f) Schematic representation and photographs of the TRLC film [80]. (g) Transmittance of the film with a change in temperature [80]. “*” means the chiral LC phase.
Figure 3. (a) DSC curve of the nCB/SLC-1717 mixtures [78]. (b) Schematic representation of the working principle and images of the PSLC film in the cooling/heating states [78]. (c) DSC curve of the SmA-LC/SLC-1717/S811 mixtures [79]. (d) Schematic diagrams and images of the PD&SLC film in the cooling/heating states [79]. (e) DSC curve of the 8CB/S811 mixtures [80]. (f) Schematic representation and photographs of the TRLC film [80]. (g) Transmittance of the film with a change in temperature [80]. “*” means the chiral LC phase.
Crystals 12 01426 g003
Crystals 12 01426 g004 550
Figure 4. PRLC smart window. Chemical structure of (a) azobenzene HABA [85], (d) PSC−01 [86]. (g) molecular motor M1 [87] and (j) IDI [88]. (b) The transmittance of the prepared window with and without UV irradiation as a function of temperature [85]. Schematic representation of the working principle and images of PRLC smart windows produced by different materials. (c) is from HABA [85]. (e,f) are from PSC−01 [86]. (h,i) are from M1 [87]. (k,l) are from IDI [88]. “*” means the chiral LC phase.
Figure 4. PRLC smart window. Chemical structure of (a) azobenzene HABA [85], (d) PSC−01 [86]. (g) molecular motor M1 [87] and (j) IDI [88]. (b) The transmittance of the prepared window with and without UV irradiation as a function of temperature [85]. Schematic representation of the working principle and images of PRLC smart windows produced by different materials. (c) is from HABA [85]. (e,f) are from PSC−01 [86]. (h,i) are from M1 [87]. (k,l) are from IDI [88]. “*” means the chiral LC phase.
Crystals 12 01426 g004
Crystals 12 01426 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Schematic diagram of preparation of PD&SLC film [91]. Digital photographs of flexible PD&SLC film controlled by (b) temperature and (c) electric field, respectively [91]. (d) Schematic explication of TR/ER LC smart window under different driving modes [92]. (e) Transmission spectra of smart window driven by 100 V at three different frequencies [92]. (f) At different temperatures, transmittance as a function of voltage and frequency [92]. “*” means the chiral LC phase.
Figure 5. (a) Schematic diagram of preparation of PD&SLC film [91]. Digital photographs of flexible PD&SLC film controlled by (b) temperature and (c) electric field, respectively [91]. (d) Schematic explication of TR/ER LC smart window under different driving modes [92]. (e) Transmission spectra of smart window driven by 100 V at three different frequencies [92]. (f) At different temperatures, transmittance as a function of voltage and frequency [92]. “*” means the chiral LC phase.
Crystals 12 01426 g005
Crystals 12 01426 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) Schematic diagram and images of TR/PR LC smart window in two working modes [93]. (b) Synthetic route of the copolymer MAzo-co-GMA alignment agent [94]. (c) Working principle of TR/PR LC smart window based on the MAzo-co-GMA alignment layer [94].
Figure 6. (a) Schematic diagram and images of TR/PR LC smart window in two working modes [93]. (b) Synthetic route of the copolymer MAzo-co-GMA alignment agent [94]. (c) Working principle of TR/PR LC smart window based on the MAzo-co-GMA alignment layer [94].
Crystals 12 01426 g006
Table
Table 1. A brief comparison of single- and dual-responsive LC smart windows.
Table 1. A brief comparison of single- and dual-responsive LC smart windows.
CategoriesActuationStimuliPreparation StrategiesState Change 1Response Time 2Ref.
Single-responsive liquid crystal smart windowsERLC smart windowsActiveElectric fieldEHDIT (98.0%) → O (10.0%)ton: 1 s
toff: 200 ms		[53]
PDLCO (1.0%) → T (79.0%)ton: 58 ms
toff: 10 ms		[48]
PSLCT (98.5%) → O (11.2%)ton: 3 ms
toff: 19 ms		[65]
PD&SLCO (2.0%) → T (80.0%)_[68]
TRLC smart windowsPassiveTemperaturePSLCO (2.1%) → T (86.6%)_[78]
PD&SLCT (80.0%) → O (2.0%)_[79]
LCsT (59.8%) → O (4.3%)_[80]
PRLC smart windowsPassiveLightAzobenzeneT (4.0%) → O (72.2%)A few seconds[85]
O (70.0%) → T (23.0%)_[86]
Molecular motorT (95.0%) → O (12.0%)_[87]
Photothermal materialsT (70.0%) → O (20.0%)_[88]
Dual-responsive liquid crystal smart windowsTR/ER LC smart windowsPassive/ActiveTemperature/Electric fieldPD&SLCO (1.5%) → T (78.0%)ton: ~100 ms @ V
toff: 183 ms @ V		[91]
EHDIT (95.1%) → O (0.3%)_[92]
TR/PR LC smart windowsPassiveTemperature/LightLCsT (64.0%) → O (17.1%)_[93]
Photothermal materialsT (80.0%) → O (3.0%)_[94]
1. “State change” means the smart windows from the initial state (0 V, room temperature) to the working state. T represents the transparent state. O represents the opaque state. 2. “_” means data not available.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Luo, L.; Liang, Y.; Feng, Y.; Mo, D.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, J. Recent Progress on Preparation Strategies of Liquid Crystal Smart Windows. Crystals 2022, 12, 1426. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12101426

AMA Style

Luo L, Liang Y, Feng Y, Mo D, Zhang Y, Chen J. Recent Progress on Preparation Strategies of Liquid Crystal Smart Windows. Crystals. 2022; 12(10):1426. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12101426

Chicago/Turabian Style

Luo, Linfeng, Yinghui Liang, Yuting Feng, Dan Mo, Yang Zhang, and Jiawen Chen. 2022. "Recent Progress on Preparation Strategies of Liquid Crystal Smart Windows" Crystals 12, no. 10: 1426. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12101426

APA Style

Luo, L., Liang, Y., Feng, Y., Mo, D., Zhang, Y., & Chen, J. (2022). Recent Progress on Preparation Strategies of Liquid Crystal Smart Windows. Crystals, 12(10), 1426. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12101426

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop