Next Article in Journal
Improvement of Hydrogenation and Dehydrogenation Kinetics of As-Cast AZ91 Magnesium Alloy via Twin Parallel Channel Angular Extrusion Processing
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Progress on Preparation Strategies of Liquid Crystal Smart Windows
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fully Transparent Amorphous Ga2O3-Based Solar-Blind Ultraviolet Photodetector with Graphitic Carbon Electrodes

Chongqing Key Laboratory of Photo-Electric Functional Materials, College of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Crystals 2022, 12(10), 1427; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12101427
Submission received: 5 September 2022 / Revised: 27 September 2022 / Accepted: 2 October 2022 / Published: 9 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Inorganic Crystalline Materials)

Abstract

:
In recent years, transparent electrode materials have had a positive effect on improving the responsivity of photodetectors by increasing the effective illumination area of devices due to their high transmittance. In this work, by using radio frequency magnetron sputtering and simple mask technology, an amorphous Ga2O3-based solar-blind UV photodetector with graphitic carbon (C) electrodes was created. The device exhibits a high responsivity of 16.34 A/W, an external quantum efficiency of 7979%, and excellent detectivity of 1.19 × 1013 Jones at room temperature under a light density of 5 μw/cm2. It has been proved that C electrodes can replace the traditional noble metal electrode. Additionally, the potential of the transparent photodetector array in solar-blind imaging is explored. We believe that the present study will pave the way for the preparation of a fully transparent and high-response solar-blind ultraviolet photodetector array.

1. Introduction

UVC generally refers to the ultraviolet electromagnetic radiation in the 100–280 nm, which does not exist on the surface of the Earth due to the thick ozone layer’s absorption as it travels through the atmosphere. Therefore, this band of light is also known as solar-blind ultraviolet light [1]. The detection of this band is called solar-blind ultraviolet detection. Solar-blind ultraviolet detection has become a research hotspot because of its low signal background noise and high detectivity. Up to now, solar-blind ultraviolet detection technology has been widely used in optical communications, ozone hole detection, high-voltage corona detection, and other fields [2,3,4,5], and it has strong research value and application prospects. As is known to all, ultra-wide band gap semiconductor materials are mainly used to prepare photosensitive layers for solar-blind ultraviolet detectors (Eg > 4.5 eV), such as AlGaN [6], MgZnO [7], ZnO [8], Ga2O3 [9], and diamond [10]. As a new type of oxide semiconductor material with an ultra-wide band gap, Ga2O3 has high thermal stability [11], ultra-wide bandgap (4.5–5.2 eV), and it has natural advantages for the solar-blind ultraviolet photodetectors. Compared with other materials, it avoids complex and unstable alloying processes and is considered a natural material for building solar-blind photodetectors [12,13,14].
At present, solar-blind UV photodetectors based on Ga2O3 can be divided into heterojunction type, Schottky type, and metal-semiconductor-metal (MSM) type according to the device structure. Among them, the MSM-type photodetectors are widely used because of their low junction capacitance per unit area, simple structure, and easy integration [15]. As is well-known, non-ferrous metals with excellent conductivity and stability are generally selected as electrode materials, such as titanium, which hinder the effective absorption of incident light by devices, making MSM solar-blind photodetectors generally have the disadvantage of low responsivity. In addition, non-ferrous metals generally have high material costs and high technological requirements [16]. Therefore, it is very important to use low-cost, transparent electrode materials to construct solar-blind photodetectors.
Recently, Wang et al. [17] used tungsten (W) transparent electrode and GaN photosensitive layers to integrate a high detectivity solar-blind photodetector, and the average transmittance of the electrode exceeded 60% from UV light to visible light (300–750 nm). Kim et al. [18] used ruthenium oxide (RuO2) film and iridium oxide (IrO2) films as electrodes to construct a solar-blind photodetector. Compared with platinum (Pt) electrodes, the responsivity of transparent devices increased by one order of magnitude. S. Oh et al. [19] prepared β-Ga2O3 based MSM-type solar-blind photodetector using a graphene electrode with high transmittance. The device exhibits an excellent responsivity of 29.8 A/W, a preeminent light–dark current ratio of ~106, an ultrahigh rejection ratio (R254 nm/R365 nm) is 9.3 × 103, and detectivity is ~1012 Jones. Compared with the opaque electrode, the device performance is greatly improved. Meanwhile, Wang et al. [20] showed that the performance of MSM-type solar-blind photodetector is directly related to the conductivity and transmittance of selected electrode materials. Therefore, the carbon material with high transmittance was used as the electrode of the all-transparent solar-blind ultraviolet photodetector to reduce the cost of device preparation and improve the performance of the detector.
In this work, radio frequency magnetron sputtering is used to produce an amorphous gallium oxide film without high-temperature treatment on a c-plane sapphire substrate. Then, high-transparent C-material fork finger electrodes are sputtered on the film by magnetron sputtering and a simple mask process. A fully transparent MSM-type solar-blind photodetector was successfully constructed, and the material and photoelectric properties of the device were characterized. Finally, the application of the device array in imaging is explored.

2. Materials and Methods

Material Growth and Device Fabrication. Firstly, the C-plane (0001) sapphire substrate was ultrasonically cleaned in absolute ethanol and acetone for 10 min each, then rinsed with deionized water and dried in nitrogen. Gallium oxide thin film was deposited on sapphire substrates by radio frequency magnetron sputtering using high purity gallium oxide ceramic targets (4N). The background vacuum of the chamber is 5 × 10−4 Pa, argon flow rate of 40 sccm, and the whole sputtering process lasted for 90 min at 150 W power to obtain amorphous gallium oxide material. Then, a highly transparent solar-blind ultraviolet photodetector was constructed by sputtering cross-finger electrodes on gallium oxide film by magnetron sputtering technology and mask process technology. The argon flow rate, working pressure, sputtering power, and duration were set to 40 sccm, 2.5 Pa, 100 W, and 40 min throughout the deposition process. The sputtering chamber base pressure is 8.0 × 10−4 Pa. The thickness of Ga2O3 films and carbon electrodes are about 318.73 nm and 48 nm, respectively.
Characterization. The crystal structure was analyzed by X-ray diffractometer (XRD, Bruker D8 ADVANCE A25X, Bruker AXS GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) with a Cu Kα line (λ = 0.1540598 nm). Raman scattering spectra were characterized by a Horiba HR Evolution spectrometer. The transmission spectra of the films and electrode materials were measured by U-4100 ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer. The photoelectric properties of the photodetector were measured by Keithley 2450. The wavelengths are 254 nm and 365 nm light sources were provided by a 6 W ultraviolet lamp. A 500 W ultraviolet-enhanced xenon lamp was used as the source of the test system, and the spectral response of the device was tested at 10 V bias voltage. All of the experiments were run at room temperature.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1a shows the XRD diffraction pattern of Ga2O3 film. It is not difficult to see that besides the substrate peak, other Ga2O3-related peak positions were not observed. All of the experiments were run at room temperature, and the relevant vibration modes of the five crystal phases of Ga2O3 were not observed, indicating that the Ga2O3 thin film prepared by RF magnetron sputtering is amorphous Ga2O3 (a-Ga2O3) thin film, which is consistent with the previously reported result [21]. Figure 1c is the transmission spectrum of C electrode material and Ga2O3 film. Obviously, both materials have ultrahigh transmittance in the visible light region. The a-Ga2O3 thin film has an obvious absorption edge at about 274 nm. However, C material shows high transmittance in the whole transmission spectrum, which is more than 90%. This suggests that compared with the traditional Ti/Au electrode, the photosensitive layer of the device is more exposed to the incident light to increase the photosensitive area of the Ga2O3 film effectively. It is well known that the absorption spectrum can be directly converted from the transmission spectrum, and the optical bandgap and absorption coefficient of semiconductor materials satisfy the Tauc relation [22]:
( α h ν ) n = B × ( h ν E g )  
where α is the absorption coefficient, hν is the photon energy, B is the constant, and Eg is the optical bandgap. In addition, Ga2O3 is a direct semiconductor material for n = 2. Figure 1d shows the optical bandgap of gallium oxide film obtained by the Tuac formula, and obtaining the bandgap of the a-Ga2O3 thin film is about 4.84 eV by extrapolation.
To investigate the photoelectric characteristics of a-Ga2O3 thin films, the MSM-type solar-blind photodetector array (3 × 3) with a C electrode was constructed by magnetron sputtering and mask process. Figure 1e shows the physical picture of the device, and it is clearly observed that the device is in a highly transparent state, which corresponds to the device possessing ultrahigh transparency in the visible light range. Figure 1f is a 3D schematic diagram of the solar-blind ultraviolet detector, in which the interfinger distance and finger width of the interfinger electrode are both 30 μm, and the finger length is 740 μm.
Figure 2a shows the I-V characteristic curve of the device under 254 nm illumination, 365 nm illumination, and dark state. An observation can be made that the photocurrent of the device and voltage manifest an evident linear relationship indicating the carbon electrodes and a-Ga2O3 thin film have good ohmic contact [23]. The dark current of the photodetector is around 1.64 × 10−8 A at 10 V bias voltage. Meanwhile, the photocurrent of the device increases with an increase in light intensity because high light density promotes the generation of electron-hole pairs. To better understand the above relationship, the curve of photocurrent with light intensity under 10 V bias voltage is displayed, as shown in Figure 2b. In general, the dependence of photocurrent on light intensity can be fitted by the power function: I = Pθ, where I is photocurrent, P is light intensity, and θ is the photocarrier activity. The value of θ obtained by fitting is about 0.54, which deviates greatly from the ideal value (θ = 1). The results demonstrated that the a-Ga2O3 thin film has many defects, which affect the carrier transport and increase the carrier energy loss [24]. The device’s performance under different illumination was calculated to quantitatively evaluate the performance of a-Ga2O3 thin film-based solar-blind ultraviolet photodetectors. The photo-to-dark current ratio (PDCR) is an important parameter to measure device performance and is defined as [25]:
PDCR =   I photo I dark I dark
where Ip is the photocurrent of the device and Id is the dark current. Figure 2c shows the change rule of the light–dark ratio of the device with light intensity under 10 bias voltage. It can be seen that the light–dark ratio of the device increases with the increase in light intensity. This is in accordance with the photocurrent to light intensity change rule, which is related to the increase in unit luminous flux, which promotes the generation of hole electron pairs in semiconductor materials. The photocurrent produced by the unit power of incident deep ultraviolet light on the photodetector’s effective area is what is referred to as the responsivity (R), which can be expressed as [26]:
R = I photo I dark S · P λ
where Pλ is the optical power density and S is the effective illumination area. The curve of R with light intensity is shown in Figure 2d. An observation can be made that R progressively declines as the light intensity rises, and the device’s maximum responsiveness is 16.34 A/W under the light density of 5 μw/cm2. The result is owing to the energy loss caused by the increase in streamer recombination activity at high light intensity [27], which is in accord with the fitting result of the curve of photocurrent as a function of light intensity. In addition to PDCR and R, external quantum efficiency (EQE) and detectivity (D*) are also the main performance parameters of optoelectronic devices. EQE is a parameter that measures the ability of a device to convert optical signals into electrical signals; the ratio of electron holes to incident photons determines the size of EQE, which can be expressed as [28]:
EQE   = hcR λ e λ
where h is the Planck constant, e is the amount of charge, λ is the wavelength of the incident light, and R is the responsivity under the irradiation of the incident light. D* represents the detection capability of the device for weak signals, which is described by the following formula [29]:
D * = RS 1 2 ( 2 qI d ) 1 2
where S (0.0028 cm2) is the area of effective illumination and q is the amount of charge. Figure 2e,f reveals the dependence of EQE and D* on the intensity of light at 10 V bias voltage. It is conspicuous that the relationships of EQE, D*, and light intensity are the same as the relationships of R and light intensity, with an increase in light intensity, all of them decrease. Under the light intensity is 5 μw/cm2, the EQE and D* reach the maximum value, which are 7979% and 1.19 × 1013 Jones, respectively.
To further understand the photoelectric characteristics of a solar-blind UV detector constructed with a C electrode, the spectral response of the device at 10 V bias voltage is shown in Figure 3a. It can be seen that the responsivity of the device begins to increase from the visible band to the solar-blind band and the maximum value is at the wavelength of 275 nm. The responsivity decreases sharply with the increase in optical wavelength, and the rejection ratio (R254/ R365) can reach 21.82. The device illustrates that it has a high sensitivity to solar-blind ultraviolet light, favorable solar-blind characteristics, and spectral selectivity with the result. Important quality requirements for solar-blind ultraviolet photodetectors are repeatability and stability. To test the stability of the device, the ultraviolet light source of 254 nm is controlled with a switching period of 10 s at 10 V bias voltage, and the working state of the device is collected at a light intensity of 500 μw/cm2, and the transient light response curve as shown in Figure 3b is drawn. There is no obvious difference in the magnitude of photocurrent after 14 switching cycles indicating the device has good stability and high repeatability. It is well known that the light response time can be divided into rising and decaying processes, and the quantitative analysis of the time can be fitted with the following types of exponential relaxation equations, with the functional formula as follows [30]:
I = I 0 + Ae t τ 1 + Be t τ 2
where I0 is the steady-state photocurrent, A and B are fitting constants, t is time, and τ1 and τ2 are two relaxation time constants corresponding to the fast response time and the slow response time of the optical response, respectively. Figure 3c shows the individual light response curves of the device at a lighting density of 500 μw/cm2. There is a high fitting degree of exponential relaxation equation; the rise time and decay time’s fitting outcomes are 0.10 s/1.73 s and 0.20 s/3.40 s, respectively.
For better comparison, Table 1 exhibits the responsivity and photoresponse time of photodetectors with different electrodes in domestic and foreign research. In general, the solar-blind ultraviolet photodetector possesses higher responsivity and faster photoresponse time than other detectors using traditional precious electrode metals. Therefore, the carbon transparent electrode can improve the performance of MSM-type Ga2O3-based solar-blind ultraviolet photodetector, and the carbon electrode has the potential to replace the traditional noble metal electrode detector.
Finally, the potential application of the device array in deep ultraviolet imaging is explored, and the principle is shown in Figure 4a. The “C” character is placed between the 254 nm lamp and the photodetector array. Ultraviolet light shines on the device through the mask, and the rest remains in the dark or weak ultraviolet light. Whereafter the current of each equipment unit is recorded unit by unit by connecting a pair of probes of the semiconductor parameter analyzer. The uniformity of the photodetector array is one of the most important requirements in imaging applications. Before the verification of imaging ability, the uniformity of the photodetector array is tested; meanwhile, record the dark current of each device unit of the device array under dark conditions and combine the results into a three-dimensional current comparison diagram, as shown in Figure 4b. As we can see, the dark current of all device units can be kept at the same level, and the narrow fluctuation indicates that the array has high uniformity possessing the potential for imaging applications. Subsequently, the application verification of solar-blind imaging was carried out. The 2D comparison diagram of the device current is shown in Figure 4c. It is worth noting that the device can display a clear “C” character shape. The above results show that the solar-blind photodetector array has the possibility to be used for solar-blind imaging and machine vision.

4. Conclusions

To sum up, by using a radio frequency magnetron sputtering simple mask process, a fully transparent solar-blind photodetectors array based on a-Ga2O3 with the carbon electrode was created. The made device displays photoelectric performance with a considerable responsivity of 16.34 A/W, light–dark ratio of 135, the external quantum efficiency of 7979%, and detectivity of 1.19 × 1013 Jones under the 254 nm light with 5 μw/cm2. In addition, the device also shows satisfactory solar-blind characteristics and stability. It is the suggestion that the carbon electrode has the potential to replace the traditional precious metal electrode and has widespread application prospects. Finally, the possibility of the device array in solar-blind imaging is verified. This work provides a reference for the development of a fully transparent solar-blind ultraviolet photodetector with high responsivity and a thought for the industrial application of the photodetector.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.F. and C.K.; methodology, S.F.; software, H.L.; validation, L.C., Q.Z. and L.Y.; formal analysis, S.Z.; investigation, Y.X.; resources, Z.H.; data curation, Z.H.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.H.; writing—review and editing, S.F.; visualization, Z.H.; supervision, H.Z.; project administration, W.L.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11904041 and 51472038), the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (Grant Nos. cstc2020jcyj-msxmX0557, cstc2020jcyj-msxmX0533, cstc2019jcyjmsxmX0237, and CSTB2022BSXM-JCX0090), the Science and Technology Research Project of Chongqing Education Committee (Grant Nos. KJQN201900542, KJQN202000511 and KJQN201800501) and the College Students Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program of Chongqing City (Grant Nos. S202110637130, S202110637123, S202110637119, S202210637046, S202210637052).

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, Y.; Tokizono, T.; Liao, M.; Zhong, M.; Koide, Y.; Yamada, I.; Delaunay, J.J. Efficient assembly of bridged β-Ga2O3 nanowires for solar-blind photodetection. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010, 20, 3972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhou, S.R.; Peng, X.; Liu, H.W.; Zhang, Z.F.; Ye, L.J.; Li, H.L.; Xiong, Y.Q.; Niu, L.B.; Chen, F.L.; Fang, L.; et al. High-performance β-Ga2O3-based solar-blind photodetector with ultralow dark current and fast photoresponse for deep-ultraviolet communication. Opt. Mater. Express 2022, 12, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Guo, D.; Su, Y.; Shi, H.Z.; Li, P.G.; Zhao, N.; Ye, J.H.; Wang, S.L.; Liu, A.P.; Chen, Z.W.; Li, C.R.; et al. Self-powered ultraviolet photodetector with superhigh photoresponsivity (3.05 A/W) based on the GaN/Sn: Ga2O3 pn junction. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 12827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yu, F.P.; Ou, S.L.; Wuu, D.S. Pulsed laser deposition of gallium oxide films for high performance solar-blind photodetectors. Opt. Mater. Express 2015, 5, 1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Liu, H.W.; Zhou, S.R.; Zhang, H.; Ye, L.J.; Xiong, Y.Q.; Yu, P.; Li, W.J.; Yang, X.; Li, H.L.; Kong, C.Y. Ultrasensitive fully transparent amorphous Ga2O3 solar-blind deep-ultraviolet photodetector for corona discharge detection. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys 2022, 55, 305104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, Y.R.; Zhang, Z.W.; Jiang, H.; Li, Z.M.; Miao, G.Q.; Song, H. The optimized growth of AlN templates for back-illuminated AlGaN-based solar-blind ultraviolet photodetectors by MOCVD. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 4936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, X.; Liu, K.W.; Wang, X.; Li, B.H.; Zhang, Z.Z.; Xie, X.H. Performance enhancement of a ZnMgO film UV photodetector by HF solution treatment. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 10645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dhar, S.; Majumder, T.; Mondal, S.P. Graphene quantum dot-sensitized ZnO nanorod/polymer Schottky junction UV detector with superior external quantum efficiency, detectivity, and responsivity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 31822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Qian, L.X.; Wu, Z.H.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Lai, P.T.; Liu, X.Z.; Li, Y.R. Ultrahigh-responsivity, rapid-recovery, solar-blind photodetector based on highly nonstoichiometric amorphous gallium oxide. ACS Photonics 2017, 4, 2203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lu, Y.J.; Lin, C.N.; Shan, C.X. Optoelectronic diamond: Growth, properties, and photodetection applications. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2018, 6, 1800359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tran, H.N.; Le, P.Y.; Murdoch, B.J.; Allen, M.W.; McConville, C.F.; Partridge, J.G. Temperature-Dependent Electrical Properties of Graphitic Carbon Schottky Contacts to β-Ga₂O₃. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2020, 67, 5669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sasaki, K.; Higashiwaki, M.; Kuramata, A.; Masui, T.; Yamakoshi, S. Si-ion implantation doping in β-Ga2O3 and its application to fabrication of low-resistance ohmic contacts. Appl. Phys. Express 2013, 6, 086502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Higashiwaki, M.; Sasaki, K.; Kuramata, A.; Masui, T.; Yamakoshi, S. Gallium oxide (Ga2O3) metal-semiconductor field-effect transistors on single-crystal β-Ga2O3 (010) substrates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 013504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Du, X.; Li, Z.; Luan, C.; Wang, W.G.; Wang, M.X.; Feng, X.J.; Xiao, H.D.; Ma, J. Preparation and characterization of Sn-doped β-Ga2O3 homoepitaxial films by MOCVD. J. Mater. Sci. 2015, 50, 3252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kaur, D.; Kumar, M. A Strategic Review on Gallium Oxide Based Deep-Ultraviolet Photodetectors: Recent Progress and Future Prospects. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2021, 9, 2002160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Berger, P.R. Testing, Reliability, and Applications of Optoelectronic Devices; International Society for Optics and Photonics: San Jose, CA, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang, C.K.; Chang, S.J.; Su, Y.K.; Chiou, Y.Z.; Chang, C.S.; Lin, T.K.; Liu, H.L.; Tang, J.J. High detectivity GaN metal–semiconductor–metal UV photodetectors with transparent tungsten electrodes. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2005, 20, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kim, J.K.; Lee, J.L. GaN MSM ultraviolet photodetectors with transparent and thermally stable RuO2 and IrO2 Schottky contacts. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2004, 151, G190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Oh, S.; Kim, C.K.; Kim, J. High responsivity β-Ga2O3 metal–semiconductor–metal solar-blind photodetectors with ultraviolet transparent graphene electrodes. Acs Photonics 2017, 5, 1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, C.K.; Chang, S.J.; Su, Y.K.; Chiou, Y.Z.; Chen, S.C.; Chang, C.S.; Lin, T.K.; Liu, H.L.; Tang, J.J. GaN MSM photodetectors with TiW transparent electrodes. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2006, 53, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lee, S.H.; Kim, S.B.; Moon, Y.J.; Kim, S.M.; Jung, H.J.; Seo, M.S.; Lee, K.M.; Kim, S.K.; Lee, S.W. High-responsivity deep-ultraviolet-selective photodetectors using ultrathin gallium oxide films. Acs Photonics 2017, 4, 2937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, J.; Ye, L.J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, H.; Li, L.; Kong, C.Y.; Li, W.J. High transmittance β-Ga2O3 thin films deposited by magnetron sputtering and post-annealing for solar-blind ultraviolet photodetector. J. Alloys. Compd. 2019, 803, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, Q.; Chen, J.; Huang, P.; Li, M.; Lu, Y.M.; Kevin, P.H.; Chang, G.; Chen, H.; He, Y.B. Influence of growth temperature on the characteristics of β-Ga2O3 epitaxial films and related solar-blind photodetectors. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 489, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xie, C.; Lu, X.T.; Liang, Y.; Chen, H.H.; Wang, L.; Wu, C.Y.; Wu, D.; Yang, W.H.; Luo, L.B. Patterned growth of β-Ga2O3 thin films for solar-blind deep-ultraviolet photodetectors array and optical imaging application. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2021, 72, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tak, B.R.; Garg, M.; Kumar, A.; Gupta, V.; Singh, R. Gamma irradiation effect on performance of β-Ga2O3 metal-semiconductor-metal solar-blind photodetectors for space applications. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2019, 8, Q3149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kong, W.Y.; Wu, G.A.; Wang, K.Y.; Zhang, T.F.; Zou, Y.F.; Wang, D.D.; Luo, L.B. High-performance photodetector based on sol–gel epitaxially grown α/β Ga2O3 thin films. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 10725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Tak, B.R.; Gupta, V.; Kapoor, A.K.; Chu, Y.H.; Singh, R. Wearable gallium oxide solar-blind photodetectors on muscovite mica having ultrahigh photoresponsivity and detectivity with added high-temperature functionalities. ACS Appl. Electronic. Mater. 2019, 1, 2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Arora, K.; Goel, N.; Kumar, M.; Kumar, M. Ultrahigh performance of self-powered β-Ga2O3 thin film solar-blind photodetector grown on cost-effective Si substrate using high-temperature seed layer. Acs Photonics 2018, 5, 2391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yu, M.; Lv, C.D.; Yu, J.G.; Shen, T.M.; Hu, J.C.; Zhang, S.N.; Cheng, H.J.; Zhang, Y.M.; Jia, R.X. High-performance photodetector based on sol–gel epitaxially grown α/β Ga2O3 thin films. Mater. Today Commun. 2020, 25, 101532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Huang, L.J.; Hu, Z.R.; Zhang, H.; Xiong, Y.Q.; Fan, S.Q.; Kong, C.Y.; Li, W.J.; Ye, L.J.; Li, H.L. A simple, repeatable and highly stable self-powered solar-blind photoelectrochemical-type photodetector using amorphous Ga2O3 films grown on 3D carbon fiber paper. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 10354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kumar, N.; Arora, K.; Kumar, M. High performance, flexible and room temperature grown amorphous Ga2O3 solar-blind photodetector with amorphous indium-zinc-oxide transparent conducting electrodes. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2019, 52, 335103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhu, W.H.; Xiong, L.X.; Si, J.W.; Hu, Z.l.; Gao, X.; Long, L.Y.; Li, T.; Wan, R.Q.; Zhang, L.; Wang, L.C. Influence of deposition temperature on amorphous Ga2O3 solar-blind ultraviolet photodetector. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2020, 35, 055037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Singh, P.A.; Krishnamoorthy, S.; Vishnu, S.S.; Xia, Z.; Muralidharan, R.; Rajan, S.; Nath, D.N. High responsivity in molecular beam epitaxy grown β-Ga2O3 metal semiconductor metal solar blind deep-UV photodetector. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 110, 221107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Zhang, D.; Zheng, W.; Lin, R.C.; Li, T.T.; Zhang, Z.W.; Huang, F. High quality β-Ga2O3 film grown with N2O for high sensitivity solar-blind-ultraviolet photodetector with fast response speed. J. Alloy. Compd. 2018, 735, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, J.; Xiong, Y.Q.; Ye, L.J.; Li, W.J.; Qin, G.P.; Ruan, H.B.; Zhang, H.; Fang, L.; Kong, C.Y.; Li, H.L. Balanced performance for β-Ga2O3 solar blind photodetectors: The role of oxygen vacancies. Opt. Mater. 2021, 112, 110808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, H.W.; Li, H.L.; Zhou, S.R.; Zhang, H.; Fan, S.Q.; Cui, Y.T.; Kong, C.Y.; Ye, L.J.; Xiong, Y.Q.; Li, W.J. Transport mechanism of enhanced performance in an amorphous/monoclinic mixed-phase Ga2O3 solar-blind deep ultraviolet photodetector. Crystals 2021, 11, 1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) XRD diffraction pattern and (b) Raman spectra of gallium oxide films; (c) transmission spectra of the gallium oxide film and electrode materials; (d) optical bandgap of gallium oxide film form Tuac formula; (e) the original photograph of the fully transparent device; (f) the graphic views of the device.
Figure 1. (a) XRD diffraction pattern and (b) Raman spectra of gallium oxide films; (c) transmission spectra of the gallium oxide film and electrode materials; (d) optical bandgap of gallium oxide film form Tuac formula; (e) the original photograph of the fully transparent device; (f) the graphic views of the device.
Crystals 12 01427 g001
Figure 2. (a) I-V characteristic curves of a-Ga2O3 thin film-based solar-blind ultraviolet photodetector at 10 V; and plots of (b) photocurrent and fitting curve; (c) light-to-dark current ratio; (d) responsivity; (e) EQE and (f) detectivity versus light intensity.
Figure 2. (a) I-V characteristic curves of a-Ga2O3 thin film-based solar-blind ultraviolet photodetector at 10 V; and plots of (b) photocurrent and fitting curve; (c) light-to-dark current ratio; (d) responsivity; (e) EQE and (f) detectivity versus light intensity.
Crystals 12 01427 g002
Figure 3. (a) Spectral response at 10 V bias; (b) transient light response curve; (c) amplification of single transient light response curve and time fitting.
Figure 3. (a) Spectral response at 10 V bias; (b) transient light response curve; (c) amplification of single transient light response curve and time fitting.
Crystals 12 01427 g003
Figure 4. (a) Schematic diagram of the imaging system; (b) two-dimensional dark current contrast diagram; (c) two-dimensional imaging current contrast diagram.
Figure 4. (a) Schematic diagram of the imaging system; (b) two-dimensional dark current contrast diagram; (c) two-dimensional imaging current contrast diagram.
Crystals 12 01427 g004
Table 1. Comparison of main performance indexes of gallium oxide-based MSM photodetectors with different electrodes at home and abroad.
Table 1. Comparison of main performance indexes of gallium oxide-based MSM photodetectors with different electrodes at home and abroad.
SampleElectrodesResponsivity/(A/W)τr/sτd/sRef.
a-Ga2O3Ti/Al70.260.41/2.040.02/0.35[9]
a-Ga2O3IZO43.992.326.14[31]
a-Ga2O3Ni1380.52/3.880.32/4.00[32]
β-Ga2O3Ni/Au0.903<1<3[4]
β-Ga2O3Ni/Au53.30.4[33]
β-Ga2O3Ti/Au26.17.308.05[34]
a-Ga2O3Ti/Au5.622.685.45[35]
a-Ga2O3Pt45.112.97 × 10−6148 × 10−6[21]
a-Ga2O3Ti/Au~0.40.68/6.180.49/6.93[36]
a-Ga2O3C16.340.10/1.730.20/3.40This work
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, Z.; Zhou, S.; Chen, L.; Zheng, Q.; Li, H.; Xiong, Y.; Ye, L.; Kong, C.; Fan, S.; Zhang, H.; et al. Fully Transparent Amorphous Ga2O3-Based Solar-Blind Ultraviolet Photodetector with Graphitic Carbon Electrodes. Crystals 2022, 12, 1427. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12101427

AMA Style

Huang Z, Zhou S, Chen L, Zheng Q, Li H, Xiong Y, Ye L, Kong C, Fan S, Zhang H, et al. Fully Transparent Amorphous Ga2O3-Based Solar-Blind Ultraviolet Photodetector with Graphitic Carbon Electrodes. Crystals. 2022; 12(10):1427. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12101427

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Zhiheng, Shuren Zhou, Lingrui Chen, Qiqi Zheng, Honglin Li, Yuanqiang Xiong, Lijuan Ye, Chunyang Kong, Siqiang Fan, Hong Zhang, and et al. 2022. "Fully Transparent Amorphous Ga2O3-Based Solar-Blind Ultraviolet Photodetector with Graphitic Carbon Electrodes" Crystals 12, no. 10: 1427. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12101427

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop