Next Article in Journal
Low-Temperature Magnetic and Magnetocaloric Properties of Manganese-Substituted Gd0.5Er0.5CrO3 Orthochromites
Next Article in Special Issue
Synthesis and Spectroscopic Characterization of Dapagliflozin/Zn (II), Cr (III) and Se (IV) Novel Complexes That Ameliorate Hepatic Damage, Hyperglycemia and Oxidative Injury Induced by Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Male Rats and Their Antibacterial Activity
Previous Article in Journal
The Complete Series of Lanthanoid-Chloranilato Lattices with Dimethylsulfoxide: Role of the Lanthanoid Size on the Coordination Number and Crystal Structure
Previous Article in Special Issue
Efficient Consecutive Synthesis of Ethyl-2-(4-Aminophenoxy) Acetate, a Precursor for Dual GK and PPARγ Activators, X-ray Structure, Hirshfeld Analysis, and DFT Studies
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Crystals
Volume 12
Issue 2
10.3390/cryst12020262
crystals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Straightforward One-Pot Synthesis of New 4-Phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetraazafluoranthen-3(2H)-one Derivatives: X-ray Single Crystal Structure and Hirshfeld Analyses

by
Ahmed T. A. Boraei
1,*,
Matti Haukka
2,
Manar Sopaih
1,
Abdullah Mohammed Al-Majid
3,
Saied M. Soliman
4,
Assem Barakat
3,* and
Ahmed A. M. Sarhan
5
1
Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Suez Canal University, Ismailia 41522, Egypt
2
Department of Chemistry, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 Jyväskylä, Finland
3
Department of Chemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21321, Egypt
5
Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Arish University, Al-Arish 45511, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2022, 12(2), 262; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12020262
Submission received: 29 January 2022 / Revised: 10 February 2022 / Accepted: 11 February 2022 / Published: 15 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Trends in Crystals at Saudi Arabia)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A straightforward one-pot route for the synthesis of a new 4-phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetraazafluoranthen-3(2H)-one is reported form the direct hydrazinolysis of triketo ester and hydrazine hydrate in ethanol. 4-Phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetraazafluoranthen-3(2H)-one was subjected to aza-Michael addition and N-alkylation on reaction with a set of alkylating agents in the presence of K2CO3. Hydrazinolysis of 4-phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetraazafluoranthen-3(2H)-one ester to hydrazide and conversion of hydrazide to thiosemicarbazide were successful. X-Ray single crystals analysis and 1H, 13C NMR were used for unambiguous structure confirmation. The O…H, N…H, C…N and C…C in 2, and the N…H, C…N, C…C, C…O and H…H interactions in 6 are the most important in the molecular packing based on Hirshfled analysis. Moreover, the presence of short C…C and C…N contacts in both compounds revealed the presence of π–π stacking interactions.

1. Introduction

Polycyclic aromatic heterocycles are a class of chemicals include multi-ring aromatic compounds. In particular, fluoranthenes [1,2,3] are an example of four fused aromatic heterocycles which recentlyreceived a lot of attention, because this core structure has remarkable applications such as organic electronics [4]. Fluoranthene is a building block which was found in many natural products, for example, daldinone E (fungus Daldinia sp.) [5], and hortein (which is a fungus Hortaea werneckii associated with the sponge Aplysina aerophoba) [6]. In a different application of fluoranthenes which was discovered as fluorescent probe (FLUN-550) is a new class of live cell permeant, nontoxic, selective staining and intracellular lipid droplets quantifications based fluoranthenes [7].
Design and synthesis of new substituted of fluoranthenes have been gaining a lot of interest in the last decade. The synthetic roads for this interesting scaffold reported in the literatures though transition metal mediated [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19] or Diels–Alder reactions [20,21,22,23].
Indeed, the palladium compound, Pd2(dba)3 (20 mol%) was employed as active catalyst for the reaction between 1,8-dichloronaphthalenes and arylboronic acid at elevated temperature (up to 175 °C) to afford the fluoranthenes derivatives [24]. Another approach that utilized the Pd-catalyst system was achieved for the synthesis of fluoranthenes which proceeded via three steps based on the inter- and intramolecular C-H arylation [25].
The Suzuki−Miyaura reaction also is considered one of the synthetic protocols for the synthesis of fluoranthenes derivatives initiating form 1,8-diiodonaphthalene in the presence of palladium catalysts [26]. Koutentis et al. also explored the chemistry of this interesting scaffold which synthesized the aza-analogues by the oxidative and non-oxidative cyclization approach [27]. Other approaches employed the silica sulphuric acid: a reusable solid catalyst for one pot synthesis of densely substituted pyrrole-fused isocoumarins under solvent-free conditions [28].
Recently, Boraei et al. have demonstrated a green and straightforward method for the synthesis of tatraazafluoranthenones starting from ninhydrin and ethyl acetoacetate (β-ketoesters) in water as a green solvent [29].
In this article, we are validating the application of our previous published method and used other β-ketoesters (ethyl benzoylacetate) and ninhydrin for the synthesis of new tatraazafluoranthenone analogues in straightforward, one-pot free catalyst route (Figure 1).

2. Materials and Methods

General Information
“Stuart Melting Point apparatus [SMP10], Bibby Scientific Ltd., (Wilmington, DE, USA) was used for measuring melting points in open capillaries and were uncorrected. Monitoring of reactions progress was done using TLC Merck aluminum-precoated silica gel plates (60 Å, F254). Product spot visualization was achieved using UV light. NMR spectra were detected using Bruker spectrometer at 400 MHz for 1H NMR and at 100 MHz for 13C NMR calibrated by (TMS, 0 ppm) as internal standard” (Supplementary Materials).
Synthesis of Ethyl 2-(2-hydroxy-1,3-dioxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-2-yl)-3-oxo-3-phenylpropanoate (1)
This compound was synthesized and characterized according to the reported procedures [30,31].
Synthesis of 4-Phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetraazafluoranthen-3(2H)-one (2)
A mixture of triketo ester 1 [6.4 g, 18.2 mmol] and hydrazine hydrate [3.0 mL] was heated under refluxed in ethanol [10.0 mL] until ppt appeared (about 0.5–1 our). The reaction mixture cooled to room temperature and the formed solid was filtered, dried, and recrystallized from DMF/EtOH.
Yield (3.0 g, 55%), m.p. >300 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 13.22 (s, 1H), 8.23 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 1H), 7.99 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.93 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.69–7.68 (m, 2H), 7.55–7.54 (m, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 158.1, 157.9, 157.1, 145.0, 137.3, 135.8, 135.7, 132.9, 131.7, 130.6, 130.4, 128.2, 127.6, 123.8, 123.1, 118.9; Elemental analysis (CHN) calculated for [C18H10N4O]: C, 72.48, H, 3.38, N, 18.78, O, 5.36 found C, 72.61, H, 3.42, N, 18.65.
Michael Addition procedure
A mixture of Michael donor 2 (0.6 g, 2.0 mmol) and Michael acceptor-acrylonitrile (0.12 g, 2.2 mmol) was refluxed in ethanol (10.0 mL) containing Et3N (0.31 mL, 2.2 mmol) for 6 h. The mixture was cooled, the solid was filtered, and recrystallized from ethanol.
3-(3-Oxo-4-phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetraazafluoranthen-2(3H)-yl)propanenitrile (3)
Yield (0.55 g, 77%), m.p. 229–230 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.26 (s, 1H), 8.02 (s, 1H), 7.91 (s, 2H), 7.72 (s, 2H), 7.57 (s, 3H), 4.46 (s, 2H), 3.06 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 158.1, 157.2, 156.7, 144.7, 137.3, 135.5, 133.1, 132.2, 130.6, 130.4, 128.1, 127.2, 124.0, 123.4, 118.9, 118.2, 48.3, 16.9; Elemental analysis (CHN) calculated for [C21H13N5O]: C, 71.79; H, 3.73; N, 19.93, O, 4.55 found C, 71.81; H, 3.83; N, 19.71.
Alkylation procedure
A mixture of tetraazafluoranthen-3(2H)-one 2 (0.6 g, 2.0 mmol) and K2CO3 (0.3 g, 2.2 mmol), in equal volumes of dry acetone/DMF (10 mL) was stirred for one hour, then alkyl halide (2.2 mmol) was added portion wise, and the reaction mixture was left on stirring overnight (the reaction is monitored by TLC and reflux is fixed if reaction did not complete). Then, the solvent was removed, water was added for complete precipitation and the formed solid was collected by filtration, dried, and recrystallized from EtOH or DMF/EtOH.
2-Allyl-4-phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetraazafluoranthen-3(2H)-one (4)
Yield (0.54 g, 79%), m.p. 190–191 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.34–8.26 (m, 1H), 7.99–7.98 (m, 3H), 7.66–7.54 (m, 5H), 6.13–6.04 (m, 1H), 5.37 (d, J = 17.2 Hz, 1H), 5.30 (d, J = 10.2 Hz, 1H), 4.91 (d, J = 5.9 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 158.1, 157.5, 156.3, 144.7, 137.3, 135.5, 134.8, 132.2, 131.8, 131.4, 130.5, 130.3, 128.0, 126.8, 124.00, 123.0, 119.1, 117.6, 55.6; Elemental Analysis calculated for [C21H14N4O]: C, 74.54; H, 4.17; N, 16.56, O, 4.73 found C, 74.69; H, 4.30; N, 16.61.
2-Benzyl-4-phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetraazafluoranthen-3(2H)-one (5)
Yield (0.64 g, 83%), m.p. 224–225 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.24 (s, 1H), 8.00 (s, 1H), 7.88 (s, 2H), 7.69 (s, 2H), 7.55 (s, 3H), 7.39 (s, 2H), 7.31 (d, J = 19.8 Hz, 3H), 5.41 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 158.2, 157.3, 156.8, 144.8, 137.4, 137.2, 135.7, 132.9, 132.0, 130.6, 130.3, 128.9, 128.1, 127.9, 127.3, 123.9, 123.3, 118.4, 56.0; Elemental Analysis calculated for [C25H16N4O]: C, 77.30; H, 4.15; N, 14.42, O, 4.12 found C, 77.43; H, 4.21; N, 14.31.
2-Pentyl-4-phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetraazafluoranthen-3(2H)-one (6)
Yield (0.45 g, 61%), m.p. 116–117 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.29–8.28 (m, 1H), 7.99–7.97 (m, 3H), 7.65–7.54 (m, 5H), 4.29 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.95–1.74 (m, 2H), 1.41–1.40 (m, 4H), 0.93 (t, J = 6.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 158.1, 157.5, 156.4, 144.2, 137.2, 135.7, 134.9, 132.2, 131.3, 130.4, 130.3, 128.0, 126.6, 124.0, 122.8, 117.5, 53.4, 28.9, 28.5, 22.4, 14.0; Elemental analysis (CHN) calculated for [C23H20N4O]: C, 74.98; H, 5.47; N, 15.21, O, 4.34 found C, 75.11; H, 5.63; N, 15.30.
Ethyl 2-(3-oxo-4-phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetraazafluoranthen-2(3H)-yl)acetate (7)
Yield (0.63 g, 81%), m.p. 189–190 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.31 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 7.99–7.96 (m, 3H), 7.75–7.53 (m, 4H), 4.96 (s, 2H), 4.27 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.26 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.0, 158.1, 157.4, 156.8, 145.3, 137.5, 135.2, 134.7, 132.3, 131.8, 130.5, 130.3, 128.0, 127.3, 124.1, 123.2, 117.6, 62.0, 52.8, 14.2; Elemental Analysis calculated for [C22H16N4O3]: C, 68.74; H, 4.20; N, 14.58, O, 12.49 found C, 68.88; H, 4.14; N, 14.41.
Synthesis of 2-(3-Oxo-4-phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetraazafluoranthen-2(3H)-yl)acetohydrazide (8)
Tetraazafluoranthen-3(2H)-one ethyl ester 7 (0.77 g, 2.0 mmol) and hydrazine hydrate 80% (2.0 mL) was refluxed in ethanol (10 mL) for 2 hours, left to cool, the formed solid product was collected by filtration, dried, and recrystallized from EtOH.
Yield (0.67 g, 90%), m.p. 287–288 °C.1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.26 (s, 1H), 8.30–8.27 (m, 1H), 8.04–8.02 (m, 1H), 7.90–7.87 (m, 2H), 7.74–7.72 (m, 2H), 7.62–7.51 (m, 3H), 4.81 (s, 2H), 4.31 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 166.3, 158.2, 156.9, 144.8, 137.3, 135.5, 133.1, 132.2, 130.6, 130.5, 128.2, 127.5, 124.0, 123.4, 118.3, 55.0; Elemental Analysis calculated for [C20H14N6O2]: C, 64.86; H, 3.81; N, 22.69, O, 10.91 found C, 64.99; H, 3.93; N, 22.61.
Synthesis of 2-(2-(3-Oxo-4-Phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetraazafluoranthen-2(3H)-yl)acetyl)-N-phenylhydrazine-1-carbothioamide (9)
To the tetraazafluoranthene-hydrazide 8 (0.74 g, 2.0 mmol) in ethanol (10 mL), phenyl isothiocyanate (0.26 mL, 2.2 mmol) was added. The mixture was refluxed for 4 hours, then cooled. The solid product was collected by filtration, dried, and recrystallized from DMF/EtOH.
Yield (0.82 g, 82%), m.p. >300 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.40 (s, 1H), 9.82 (s, 1H), 9.36 (brs, 1H), 8.31–8.29 (m, 1H), 8.10–7.95 (m, 1H), 7.94–7.87 (m, 2H), 7.79–7.69 (m, 2H), 7.66–7.50 (m, 3H), 7.41–7.39 (m, 2H), 7.31 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.19 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 5.03 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 181.0, 166.9, 158.1, 157.2, 157.0, 144.8, 139.3, 137.2, 135.4, 133.1, 132.2, 130.6, 128.6, 128.2, 127.2, 125.6, 124.0, 123.4, 118.0, 55.6; Elemental Analysis calculated for [C27H19N7O2S]: C, 64.15; H, 3.79; N, 19.39; O, 6.33; S, 6.34 found C, 64.31; H, 3.71; N, 19.29; S, 6.37.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Chemistry

Hydrazinolysis of triketo ester 1 by hydrazine hydrate in ethanol under reflux for 0.5-1 h, fascinatingly, gave 4-phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetraazafluoranthen-3(2H)-one 2 in moderate yield (55%) (Scheme 1). The 1H NMR displayed, in addition to the aromatic proton signals between δ 8.23 and 7.55 ppm, a signal at δ 13.22 ppm for NH. The 13C NMR showed all carbons between δ 158.1 and 118.9 ppm.
Aza-Michael addition was explored from the addition of 2 to acrylonitrile in ethanol and the presences of Et3N to give the Michael adduct 3 in good yield (Scheme 2). The Michael adduct revealed two new signals at δ 4.46 and 3.06 ppm in 1H NMR and their respective carbons appeared at δ 48.3 and 16.9 ppm in 13C NMR which strongly support aza-Michael addition, not oxa-Michael addition.
Alkylation of 4-phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetraazafluoranthen-3(2H)-one 2 with allyl bromide, benzyl bromide, amyl bromide, and ethyl chloroacetate was done in acetone/DMF and use of K2CO3 as proton capturer which led to N-alkylation and formation of aza-alkylated products 4–7 in good yields (Scheme 3). The allylated product 4 spectra demonstrated that the allyl group protons as: The sp2 vinylic methine proton CH2=CH- appeared as multiplet between 6.13 and 6.14 ppm, the vinylic sp2 methylene protons H2C=CH- were found as two doublet signals, one of them at 5.37 ppm with coupling constant value 17.2 Hz for the trans proton, and the other was deduced at 5.30 ppm with 3J value 10.2 Hz for the cis proton. The allylic sp3 methylene protons NCH2 was established as doublet at 4.91 ppm. The allylic carbon atom NCH2 was detected at δ 55.6 ppm. The benzylated compound 5 showed the benzyl methylene protons as singlet at 5.41 ppm and the corresponding benzylic methylene carbon at δ 56.0 ppm. The amylated tetraazafluoranthen-3(2H)-one 6 showed the amyl group protons at δ 4.29, 1.95–1.74, 1.41–1.40, and 0.93 ppm and the respective amyl carbons at δ 53.4, 28.5, 22.4, and 14.0 ppm. The esterified product 7 showed a singlet signal at 4.96 ppm for NCH2, a quartet signal at δ 4.29 ppm for OCH2, and a triplet signal at δ 1.26 ppm for CH3. The 13C NMR displayed the carbonyl carbon of the ester group at δ 168.0 ppm, the OCH2 at 62.0 ppm, NCH2 at δ 52.8 ppm, and CH3 at δ 14.2 ppm.
Reaction of 4-phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetraazafluoranthen-3(2H)-one ester 7 with hydrazine hydrate afforded the hydrazide 8 which was subjected to reaction with phenyl isothiocyanate in ethanol to afford the thiosemicarbazide 9 (Scheme 4). The 4-phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetraazafluoranthen-3(2H)-one hydrazide 8 displayed the hydrazide group protons at δ 9.26 and 4.31 ppm for NH and NH2, respectively, in addition to the NCH2 protons at δ 4.81 ppm. The 13C NMR showed the carbonyl carbon of the hydrazide group at δ 166.3 ppm and the NCH2 methylene carbon at δ 55.0 ppm. The 4-phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetraazafluoranthen-3(2H)-one thiosemicarbazide 9 showed the three NH protons signals at δ 10.40, 9.82, and 9.36 ppm. The respective 13C NMR detected the thiocarbonyl carbon (C=S) at δ 181.0 ppm, the carbonyl carbon (C=O) at δ 166.9 ppm, and the NCH2 methylene carbon at δ 55.6 ppm.

3.2. X-ray Discerption of Compounds 2 and 6

The X-ray structure of 2 is presented in Figure 2A. The structure of 2 crystallized in the orthorhombic crystal system and Pbca space group with lattice parameters: a = 12.82600(10) Å, b = 7.80290(10) Å andc = 26.6306(2) Å, and unit cell volume of 2665.19(4) Å3 and Z = 8 (Table 1). There are four fused ring systems which are almost coplanar. The phenyl ring attached to this fused system is twisted from its mean plan by 47.96°Selected geometric parameters of 2 are listed in Table 2.
The supramolecular structure of 2 is dominated by the N4-H4…N1 hydrogen bonding interactions leading to the hydrogen bonding polymer shown in the upper part of Figure 2. The hydrogen bond parameters are listed in Table 3. In addition, the hydrogen bonded chains are stacked to each other via significant amount of π–π contacts. The shortest π–πstacking interactions are listed in Table 4. Hence, the supramolecular structure of 2 could be described by 1D hydrogen bonding polymer along the b-direction (Figure 3; upper part) combined with π–π stacking interactions along the a-direction (Figure 3; lower part).
The X-ray structure of 6 is presented in Figure 2B. The structure of 6 crystallized in the less symmetric monoclinic crystal system and P21/c space group with lattice parameters: a = 5.26840(10) Å, b = 15.21900(10) Å, c = 22.7155(2)Å, α = γ = 90 while β = 93.6920(10) and unit cell volume of 1817.54(4) Å3 and Z = 4. Selected geometric parameters of 6 are listed in Table 2. In this case, the mean plane of the almost coplanar fused ring system and the phenyl ring attached to it are twisted from one another by 40.66°. The value of the twist angle is less than that in 2. The packing in 6 is dominated by π–π stacking interactions shown in Figure 4 and the shortest interactions between the stacked π-system are listed in Table 4.

3.3. Analysis of Molecular Packing

Each crystal has its characteristic Hirshfeld surfaces which shed the light on the important intermolecular interactions which play important role in the crystal stability. In Figure 5, the different mapped surfaces of compounds 2 and 6 are summarized. The dnorm indicated a number of red spots related to intermolecular contacts shorter than the vdWs radii sum of the interacting atoms. In compound 2, the most important contacts are the O…H, N…H, C…N and C…C interactions. On the other hand, the N…H, C…N, C…C, C…O and H…H interactions are the most important. Summary of these short contacts and the corresponding interaction distances are depicted in Table 5. The results revealed very well the presence of large number of C…C and C…N contacts in both compounds which confirm the presence of π–π stacking interactions. Generally, these contacts occurred at longer interaction distances in 2 compared to 6. In addition, the red/blue triangles in the shape index and large green area in curvedness are other evidences on the presence of π–π stacking interactions (region D in Figure 5).
On the other hand, analysis of the fingerprint plot gave a quantitative summary for all intermolecular contacts occurred in the crystal structure of compounds 2 and 6 (Figure 6).The decomposition of the fingerprint plot gave a quantitative summary for all contacts that occurred in the crystal structures of compounds 2 and 6 (Figure 7). It is clear that the most frequent contacts in both compounds are the H…H interactions. The percentages of H…H interactions are 53.6 and 32.4% in compounds 2 and 6, respectively. The shortest H…H contacts in 6 are H1…H1 with interaction distance of 2.108 Å. In 2, all H…H contacts are significantly long and are considered of less importance compared to compound 6. The second most frequent contacts are the C…H interactions which comprised 15.9 and 23.1% from the whole interactions occurred in the crystal of 2 and 6, respectively. In compound 2, the percentages of the important O…H, N…H, C…N and C…C interactions are 3.5%, 13.6%, 2.2%, and 8.3%, respectively. Both O…H and N…H contacts appeared as sharp spikes in the fingerprint plot (Figure 6). As a result, these interactions are considered strong and play an important role in the crystal stability of 2 and the π–π stacking interactions as well. The spikes of the N…H and O…H interactions in 6 are less sharp, indicating weaker interactions than those that occurred in 2. The percentages of the O…H, N…H, C…N and C…C interactions in 6 are 9.0, 15.8, 7.3, and 9.1%, respectively.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, this manuscript introduced a direct one-pot method for obtaining 4-phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetraazafluoranthen-3(2H)-one from triketo ester to validate the application of our previous published method. Herein, another β-ketoester (ethyl benzoylacetate) was used for obtaining the triketo ester which used for the synthesis of tatraazafluoranthenone. On reaction with Michael acceptors like acrylonitrile, aza-Michael addition was produced. Alkylation of tetraazafluoranthen-3(2H)-one in the presence of K2CO3 led to N-alkylation, not O-alkylation, this evidence was deduced from the 13C NMR signal around 50.00 ppm for NCH2. Hydrazinolysis of 4-phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetraazafluoranthen-3(2H)-one ester led to hydrazide formation which is converted to thiosemicarbazide by reaction with phenyl isothiocyanate. Different intermolecular interactions that occurred in the crystal structures of compound 2 and 6 were analyzed using Hirshfled calculations.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cryst12020262/s1, X-ray structure determinations; Figure S1: 1H NMR of 2; Figure S2: 13C NMR of 2; Figure S3: 1H NMR of 3; Figure S4: 13C NMR of 3; Figure S5: 1H NMR of 4; Figure S6: 13C NMR of 4; Figure S7: 1H NMR of 5; Figure S8: 13C NMR of 5; Figure S9: 1H NMR of 6; Figure S10: 13C NMR of 6; Figure S11: 1H NMR of 7; Figure S12: 13C NMR of 7; Figure S13: 1H NMR of 8; Figure S14: 13C NMR of 8; Figure S15: 1H NMR of 9; Figure S16: 13C NMR of 9.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.T.A.B., A.B. and A.A.M.S.; methodology, M.S. and A.A.M.S.; software, M.H. and S.M.S.; validation, M.S. and A.A.M.S.; formal analysis, A.T.A.B., S.M.S. and M.H.; investigation, A.T.A.B. and A.A.M.S.; resources, A.T.A.B.; data curation, A.T.A.B. and M.H.; writing—original draft preparation, A.T.A.B., A.B.; writing—review and editing, A.B.; visualization, A.M.A.-M.; supervision, A.B.; project administration, M.S. and A.M.A.-M.; funding acquisition, A.M.A.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Researchers Supporting Project (RSP2022R427), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project (RSP2022R427), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Stępień, M.; Gońka, E.; Żyła, M.; Sprutta, N. Heterocyclic nanographenes and other polycyclic heteroaromatic compounds: Synthetic routes, properties, and applications. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 3479–3716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Feng, X.; Pisula, W.; Müllen, K. Large polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Synthesis and discotic organization. Pure Appl. Chem. 2009, 81, 2203–2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Plunkett, K. What about the five-membered ring? Cyclopentafused polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons as a building block for functional materials. Synlett 2013, 24, 898–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lee, Y.H.; Wu, T.C.; Liaw, C.W.; Wen, T.C.; Feng, S.W.; Lee, J.J.; Guo, T.F. Non-doped active layer, benzo [k] fluoranthene-based linear acenes, for deep blue-to green-emissive organic light-emitting diodes. Org. Electron. 2013, 14, 1064–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Du, L.; King, J.B.; Cichewicz, R.H. Chlorinated polyketide obtained from a Daldinia sp. Treated with the epigenetic modifier suberoylanilide hydroxamic Acid. J. Nat. Prod. 2014, 77, 2454–2458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Brauers, G.; Ebel, R.; Edrada, R.; Wray, V.; Berg, A.; Gräfe, U.; Proksch, P. Hortein, a new natural product from the fungus Hortaea werneckii associated with the Sponge Aplysina aerophoba. J. Nat. Prod. 2001, 64, 651–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Goel, A.; Sharma, A.; Kathuria, M.; Bhattacharjee, A.; Verma, A.; Mishra, P.R.; Nazir, A.; Mitra, K. New fluoranthene FLUN-550 as a fluorescent probe for selective staining and quantification of intracellular lipid droplets. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 756–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gu, X.; Luhman, W.A.; Yagodkin, E.; Holmes, R.J.; Douglas, C.J. Diarylindenotetracenes via a selective cross-coupling/C−H functionalization: Electron donors for organic photovoltaic cells. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 1390–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wu, H.; Fang, R.; Tao, J.; Wang, D.; Qiao, X.; Yang, X.; Hartl, F.; Li, H. Diacenaphthylene-fused benzo [1, 2-b: 4, 5-b′] dithiophenes: Polycyclic heteroacenes containing full-carbon five-membered aromatic rings. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 751–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rice, J.E.; Cai, Z.W. An intramolecular arene-triflate coupling reaction for the regiospecific synthesis of substituted benzofluoranthenes. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 1415–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Reisch, H.A.; Bratcher, M.S.; Scott, L.T. Imposing curvature on a polyarene by intramolecular palladium-catalyzed arylation reactions: A simple synthesis of dibenzo[a,g]corannulene. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1427–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wegner, H.A.; Scott, L.T.; de Meijere, A. A new Suzuki–Heck-Type coupling cascade: Indeno [1, 2, 3]-annelation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 883–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wu, Y.-T.; Linden, A.; Siegel, J.S. Formal [(2+2)+2] and [(2+2)+(2+2)] nonconjugated dienediyne cascade cycloadditions. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4353–4355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pascual, S.; Bour, C.; de Mendoza, P.; Echavarren, A.M. Synthesis of fluoranthenes by hydroarylation of alkynes catalyzed by gold (I) or gallium trichloride. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2011, 7, 1520–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chen, X.; Lu, P.; Wang, Y. Four iodine-mediated electrophilic cyclizations of rigid parallel triple bonds Mapped from 1, 8-Dialkynylnaphthalenes. Chem.−Eur. J. 2011, 17, 8105–8114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kawasumi, K.; Mochida, K.; Kajino, T.; Segawa, Y.; Itami, K. Pd(OAc)2/o-Chloranil/M(OTf)n: A catalyst for the direct C−H arylation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with boryl-, silyl-, and unfunctionalized arenes. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 418–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chang, M.-Y.; Lee, T.-W.; Wu, M.-H. Polyphosphoric acid promoted synthesis of 10,11-Dihydrobenzo[j]fluoranthen-12-one. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 2198–2201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhou, J.; Yang, W.; Wang, B.; Ren, H. Friedel−Crafts arylation for the formation of Csp2-Csp2 bonds: A route to unsymmetrical and functionalized polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from aryl triazenes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 12293–12297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ogawa, N.; Yamaoka, Y.; Yamada, K.-I.; Takasu, K. Synthesis of π-extended fluoranthenes via a KHMDS-promoted anionic-radical reaction cascade. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 3327–3330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Chiechi, R.C.; Tseng, R.J.; Marchioni, F.; Yang, Y.; Wudl, F. Efficient Blue-Light-Emitting Electroluminescent Devices with a Robust Fluorophore: 7,8,10-Triphenylfluoranthene. Adv. Mater. 2006, 18, 325–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yan, Q.; Zhou, Y.; Ni, B.-B.; Ma, Y.; Wang, J.; Pei, J.; Cao, Y. Organic semiconducting materials from sulfur-hetero benzo[k]-fluoranthene derivatives: Synthesis, photophysical properties, and thin film fransistor fabrication. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 5328–5339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Goel, A.; Kumar, V.; Chaurasia, S.; Rawat, M.; Prasad, R.; Anand, R.S. Synthesis, electrochemical and optical properties of stable yellow fluorescent fluoranthenes. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 3656–3662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ding, L.; Ying, H.-Z.; Zhou, Y.; Lei, T.; Pei, J. Polycyclic imide derivatives: Synthesis and effective tuning of lowest unoccupied molecular orbital levels through molecular engineering. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 5522–5525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Quimby, J.M.; Scott, L.T. Expanding the Suzuki−Heck-type coupling cascade: A new indeno [1, 2, 3]-annelation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 1009–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yamaguchi, M.; Higuchi, M.; Tazawa, K.; Manabe, K. Three-step synthesis of fluoranthenes through Pd-catalyzed inter-and intramolecular C−H arylation. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 3967–3974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pal, S.; Metin, O.; Turkmen, Y.E. Synthesis of fluoranthene derivatives via tandem Suzuki−Miyaura and intramolecular C−H Arylation reactions under both homogeneous and heterogeneous catalytic conditions. ACS Omega 2017, 2, 8689–8696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Koutentis, P.A.; Loizou, G.; Lo Re, D. Synthesis of triazafluoranthenones via silver (I)-mediated nonoxidative and oxidative intramolecular palladium-catalyzed cyclizations. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 5793–5802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pathak, S.; Debnath, K.; Pramanik, A. Silica sulfuric acid: A reusable solid catalyst for one pot synthesis of densely substituted pyrrole-fused isocoumarins under solvent-free conditions. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2013, 9, 2344–2353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Boraei, A.T.; Ghabbour, H.A.; Sarhan, A.A.; Barakat, A. Expeditious green synthesis of novel 4-methyl-1, 2, 5, 6-tetraazafluoranthen-3 (2H)-one analogue from ninhydrin: N/S-alkylation and aza-Michael addition. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 5436–5442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Boraei, A.T.A.; Soliman, S.M.; Haukka, M.; Salama, E.E.; Sopaih, M.; Barakat, A.; Sarhan, A.A.M. Straightforward green synthesis of indeno-furan carboxylates from ninhydrin and β-ketoesters: X-Ray crystal structure, Hirshfeld and DFT investigations. J. Mol. Strut. 2022, 1255, 132433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Peet, N.P.; Huber, E.W.; Huffman, J.C. Reaction of ninhydrin with β-dicarbonyl compounds. J. Heterocyclic Chem. 1995, 32, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Crystals 12 00262 g001 550
Figure 1. Retro-synthesis of the fluoranthenes.
Figure 1. Retro-synthesis of the fluoranthenes.
Crystals 12 00262 g001
Crystals 12 00262 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 4-phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetraazafluoranthen-3(2H)-one 2.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 4-phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetraazafluoranthen-3(2H)-one 2.
Crystals 12 00262 sch001
Crystals 12 00262 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Aza-Michael addition of compound 2 to acrylonitrile.
Scheme 2. Aza-Michael addition of compound 2 to acrylonitrile.
Crystals 12 00262 sch002
Crystals 12 00262 sch003 550
Scheme 3. Aza-alkylation of 4-phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetraazafluoranthen-3(2H)-one2 with a set of alkylating agents.
Scheme 3. Aza-alkylation of 4-phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetraazafluoranthen-3(2H)-one2 with a set of alkylating agents.
Crystals 12 00262 sch003
Crystals 12 00262 sch004 550
Scheme 4. Hydrazinolysis of 4-phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetraazafluoranthen-3(2H)-one ester and thiosemicarbazide formation.
Scheme 4. Hydrazinolysis of 4-phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetraazafluoranthen-3(2H)-one ester and thiosemicarbazide formation.
Crystals 12 00262 sch004
Crystals 12 00262 g002 550
Figure 2. ORTEP of compounds 2 (A) and 6 (B).
Figure 2. ORTEP of compounds 2 (A) and 6 (B).
Crystals 12 00262 g002
Crystals 12 00262 g003 550
Figure 3. Packing via N-H…N hydrogen bonds and π–π stacking (lower) in 2.
Figure 3. Packing via N-H…N hydrogen bonds and π–π stacking (lower) in 2.
Crystals 12 00262 g003
Crystals 12 00262 g004 550
Figure 4. π–π stacking (lower) in 2.
Figure 4. π–π stacking (lower) in 2.
Crystals 12 00262 g004
Crystals 12 00262 g005 550
Figure 5. Hirshfeld maps of compounds 2 and 6. The most important interactions are (A) O…H, (B) N…H, (C) C…N, (D) C…C, (E) C…O, and (F) H…H.
Figure 5. Hirshfeld maps of compounds 2 and 6. The most important interactions are (A) O…H, (B) N…H, (C) C…N, (D) C…C, (E) C…O, and (F) H…H.
Crystals 12 00262 g005
Crystals 12 00262 g006 550
Figure 6. Decomposed fingerprint plots in compounds 2 and 6.
Figure 6. Decomposed fingerprint plots in compounds 2 and 6.
Crystals 12 00262 g006
Crystals 12 00262 g007 550
Figure 7. All intermolecular interactions in compounds 2 and 6.
Figure 7. All intermolecular interactions in compounds 2 and 6.
Crystals 12 00262 g007
Table
Table 1. Crystal data of 2 and 6.
Table 1. Crystal data of 2 and 6.
Identification Code26
CCDC2,129,9542,129,955
empirical formulaC18H10N4OC23H20N4O
Fw298.30368.43
temp (K)120(2) K120(2)
λ(Å)1.54184 Å1.54184
Cryst. Syst.OrthorhombicMonoclinic
space groupPbcaP21/c
a (Å)12.82600(10)5.26840(10)
b (Å)7.80290(10)15.21900(10)
c (Å)26.6306(2)22.7155(2)
α, β, γ (deg)α = β = γ = 90α = γ = 90;
β = 93.6920(10)
V (Å3)2665.19(4)1817.54(4)
Z84
ρcalc (Mg/m3)1.4871.346
μ(Mo Kα) (mm−1)0.7870.677
No. reflns.37,51146,295
Unique reflns.28023840
Completeness to θ = 67.684°100%100%
GOOF (F2)1.0571.052
Rint0.02900.0377
R1a (I ≥ 2σ)0.03280.0356
wR2b (I ≥ 2σ)0.09580.0901
aR1 = Σ||Fo| − |Fc||/Σ|Fo|. b wR2 = {Σ[w(Fo2 − Fc2)2]/Σ[w(Fo2)2]}1/2.
Table
Table 2. Selected bond lengths [Å] and angles [°] for 2.
Table 2. Selected bond lengths [Å] and angles [°] for 2.
2
O(1)-C(10)1.2109(12)
N(1)-C(9)1.3153(13)
N(1)-N(2)1.3726(12)
N(2)-C(12)1.3361(13)
N(3)-C(7)1.3034(14)
N(3)-N(4)1.3660(12)
N(4)-C(10)1.4089(12)
6
O(1)-C(18)1.2207(13)
N(1)-C(7)1.3415(13)
N(1)-N(2)1.3709(12)
N(2)-C(8)1.3168(13)
N(3)-N(4)1.3716(12)
N(3)-C(18)1.4137(13)
N(3)-C(19)1.4696(12)
Table
Table 3. Hydrogen bonds for 2 [Å and °].
Table 3. Hydrogen bonds for 2 [Å and °].
D-H...Ad(D-H)d(H...A)d(D...A)<(DHA)
N(4)-H(4)...N(1)#10.927(18)1.992(18)2.9135(12)172.3(13)
Symmetry code: #1 x, y−1, z
Table
Table 4. π–π stacking for 2 and 6 [Å and °].
Table 4. π–π stacking for 2 and 6 [Å and °].
ContactsLengthContactsLength
26
C1…C73.387N2…C53.195
C1…C83.378C11…C83.344
C3…C103.334C12…C153.303
C6…C93.337C14…C183.301
Table
Table 5. Short contacts in compounds 2 and 6.
Table 5. Short contacts in compounds 2 and 6.
ContactDistanceContactDistance
26
N1…H11.911N2…H132.446
N2…H142.584C5…N23.195
O1…H172.405C11…C83.344
C10…N23.227C12…C153.303
C1…C73.387C14…C183.301
C1…C83.378C15…O13.158
C3…C103.334H1…H12.108
C6…C93.337
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Boraei, A.T.A.; Haukka, M.; Sopaih, M.; Al-Majid, A.M.; Soliman, S.M.; Barakat, A.; Sarhan, A.A.M. Straightforward One-Pot Synthesis of New 4-Phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetraazafluoranthen-3(2H)-one Derivatives: X-ray Single Crystal Structure and Hirshfeld Analyses. Crystals 2022, 12, 262. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12020262

AMA Style

Boraei ATA, Haukka M, Sopaih M, Al-Majid AM, Soliman SM, Barakat A, Sarhan AAM. Straightforward One-Pot Synthesis of New 4-Phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetraazafluoranthen-3(2H)-one Derivatives: X-ray Single Crystal Structure and Hirshfeld Analyses. Crystals. 2022; 12(2):262. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12020262

Chicago/Turabian Style

Boraei, Ahmed T. A., Matti Haukka, Manar Sopaih, Abdullah Mohammed Al-Majid, Saied M. Soliman, Assem Barakat, and Ahmed A. M. Sarhan. 2022. "Straightforward One-Pot Synthesis of New 4-Phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetraazafluoranthen-3(2H)-one Derivatives: X-ray Single Crystal Structure and Hirshfeld Analyses" Crystals 12, no. 2: 262. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12020262

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop