Next Article in Journal
Unveiling the Mechanisms of High-Temperature 1/2[111] Screw Dislocation Glide in Iron–Carbon Alloys
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis of AlN Nanowires by Al-Sn Flux Method
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Properties of Sm-Doped SrCl2 Crystalline Scintillators

1
Division of Materials Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology (NAIST), 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma 630-0192, Nara, Japan
2
Department of Applied Chemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, 6-6 Aramaki, Aoba, Sendai 980-8579, Miyagi, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2022, 12(4), 517; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12040517
Submission received: 28 February 2022 / Revised: 30 March 2022 / Accepted: 6 April 2022 / Published: 8 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Inorganic Crystalline Materials)

Abstract

:
Sm-doped SrCl2 crystals were prepared, and the scintillation properties such as emission spectra, decay profiles, and pulse height were investigated. Under X-ray irradiation, a broad band can be observed at 680 nm, which indicates that the major origin is due to 5d-4f transitions of Sm2+. The decay curve is approximated by one exponential function with a decay time of 10 μs, and the decay time constant is typical for Sm2+. From the pulse height of 137Cs γ-rays, 0.1% Sm:SrCl2 shows a light yield of 33,000 photons/MeV.

1. Introduction

A scintillator is a material that exhibits luminescence when excited by ionizing radiation and is used with a photodetector to convert emitted photons into electrical signals. Scintillators play an important role in radiation measurements such as medicine [1,2], resource exploration [3], security [4], astrophysics [5], and monitoring [6,7]. Conventionally, scintillators that exhibit ultraviolet or visible luminescence, suitable for general Si-based photodiodes or photomultiplier tubes, have mainly been developed [8,9,10]. On the other hand, scintillators with near-infrared (NIR) luminescence have been attracting attention. Wavelengths from 650 to 950 nm, called the first optical window, are transparent to water and blood in the human body [11,12]. Hence, in vivo dosimetry during radiotherapy [13,14] and monitoring of drug delivery [15,16] have been suggested as promising applications. In addition, high-dose monitoring applications have been proposed. When monitoring high-dose environments such as nuclear reactors, radiation damage to semiconductor components hinders stable measurement. Therefore, remote monitoring using optical fiber has been proposed, and NIR photons have an advantage due to their high transmittance for optical fiber [17,18]. In addition, it is easy to distinguish red-NIR photons from Cherenkov light generated in a nuclear reactor because Cherenkov light, characterized by pale light, is known to have high light intensity in the near-ultraviolet to visible regions [19,20]. On the other hand, in high-dose field measurements using conventional ultraviolet–visible scintillators, Cherenkov light inhibits stable measurements.
Alkaline earth halides doped with divalent rare-earth ions, as represented by Eu:SrI2 [21,22,23,24,25], exhibit high-scintillation LY and high energy resolution, and Sm2+ has been recently attracting attention as an emission center showing red-NIR photons [26,27,28]. So far, there have been few reports of radioluminescence (RL) from Sm2+-doped materials [29,30,31,32,33,34]. The properties of Sm-doped SrCl2 have not yet been clarified, despite its relatively low deliquescence, ease of growth, and adequate bandgap energy (~5.2 eV [35]). In this study, we focused on Sm-doped SrCl2 crystals as a red-NIR scintillator and investigated the scintillation properties.

2. Materials and Methods

Sm-doped SrCl2 single crystals were synthesized using a vertical Bridgman furnace (VFK-1800, Crystal Systems, Yamanashi, Japan). The initial concentrations of tested Sm were 0.1, 0.5, and 1%. SrCl2·6H2O (99%), SmCl3 (99.9%), and carbon powders were vacuumed (~10 Pa) in a quartz ampoule and then sealed using a gas burner (KSA-22, Tokyo Koshin Rikagaku Seisakusho, Tokyo, Japan). Here, the carbon powder maintains the reduction conditions to remove residual oxygen contamination and promote the reduction of Sm3+ → Sm2+ [36]. Then, crystal growth was performed using the Bridgman furnace with a pulling speed of 10 mm/h. The samples were processed into smaller samples, and the actual concentrations were determined using X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analyses (SEA-1000A, SII, Chiba, Japan). The tested tube voltage and used filters were 50 kV with a Pb filter, 30 kV with a Pb filter, and 15 kV with a Cr filter.
Photoluminescence (PL) properties were evaluated using spectrofluorometers (C11347 and C11367, Hamamatsu Photonics, Shizuoka, Japan). Radioluminescence (RL) spectra under X-ray irradiation, RL decay profiles, and pulse height were measured according to a previously reported setup [37,38]. The photomultiplier tube with a multialkali photoelectric surface used at pulse height covered the sensitivity of 300–900 nm, and the quantum efficiency (QE) was 18% at 520 nm and 10% at 680 nm.

3. Results and Discussion

The sizes of 0.1, 0.5, and 1% Sm:SrCl2 synthesized by the Bridgman method were approximately 4–6 mmφ × 10–15 mm, and they had a few cracks owing to the high pull-down speed. For following characterizations, the samples were cut into small pieces with a size of 2–3 mmφ × 1 mm, and the surfaces were polished. The actual Sm concentrations of the 0.1, 0.5, and 1% Sm:SrCl2 samples are 0.043, 0.186, and 0.315%, respectively. In all samples, the selected pieces showed lower Sm concentrations than the initial concentrations because of segregation. Figure 1 shows the appearance of the prepared Sm:SrCl2. The appearance of the sample is transparent, and red luminescence is observed when irradiated with an ultraviolet lamp (365 nm). X-ray fluorescence spectra of 0.1% Sm:SrCl2 sample with a tube voltage of (top) 50 kV, (middle) 30 kV, and (bottom) 15 kV are shown in Figure S1.
Figure 2 shows the PL 3D spectrum of the 0.1% Sm-doped sample, and the 0.1, 0.5, and 1% doped samples show QYs of 85.9%, 65.7%, and 39.4%, respectively. Under excitation from 290 to 680 nm, a broad emission band is observed at 680 nm The spectral features are almost the same as those in Sm:SrBr2 [28]. Figure 3 shows the PL decay profiles monitored at 680 nm when excited at 280 nm. The obtained curves are fitted with an exponential function, which indicates the emission has the decay time constants of 9–11 μs. The origin is the 5d-4f transitions of Sm2+ because the decay time constants are close to those reported in previous studies [28]. The decrease in QY indicates concentration quenching, while the decay does not change. The results suggest that the radiative transition rate decreases, and the nonradiative transition rate increases as the Sm-concentration increases.
Figure 4 shows the RL spectra of Sm:SrCl2 crystals. The samples dominantly exhibit an emission band at 680 nm due to Sm2+. In addition, a broad emission band is observed at 430 nm, which is due to self-trapped excitons [39]. The emission decreases with the concentration of doped Sm. According to PL analyses, the wavelength of STE luminescence overlaps with the absorption wavelength of Sm2+, and the absorption decreases STE luminescence. In addition, all samples exhibit a few sharp peaks in the range from 550 to 610 nm, and the origin is the 4f-4f transitions of Sm3+. Figure 5 shows the RL decay curves of the Sm:SrCl2 crystals. The obtained curves are approximated with one exponential function, which indicates that the decay times are about 9 μs. The values are shorter than PL decay, and this trend was also observed in other materials. One reason is thought to be the interaction of numerous excited secondary electrons leading to quenching.
Figure 6 shows the pulse height spectra of Sm:SrCl2 under 137Cs (662 keV γ-rays) exposure. Ce:Y3Al5O12 was selected as a reference sample showing an RL peak at 520 nm with an LY of 20,000 photons/MeV [40]. The light yields (LYs) of the samples were calculated as follows: LY = 20,000 × (channelsample/channelref) × (18%/10%), calculated considering the photoabsorption peak channel and spectral sensitivity of the used photomultiplier tube. The LYs are 33,000 for 0.1%, 28,000 for 0.5%, and 24,000 photons/MeV for 1% Sm:SrCl2 crystals. Among the samples, the 0.1% doped sample shows the highest LY. This value is higher than Sm:Ba0.3Sr0.7Cl2 (22,000), Sm:SrBr2 (32,000) and Eu:SrBr2 (25,000), while it is lower than Sm, Eu:SrI2 (~40,000), Eu:SrI2 (80,000) and Yb:SrX2 (~50,000) [22,23,31,34,41]. The LYs increase with increasing QYs, and the LYs are dependent on the QYs. The trend of the results are consistent with the Robbins and Lempicki models [42,43].

4. Conclusions

Sm-doped SrCl2 crystals were prepared to investigate the properties for scintillator applications. Sm:SrCl2 shows a broad peak at 680 nm due to Sm2+. The decay curves are approximated with an exponential function, and the decay time constant is typical of Sm2+. The PL QY and LY of the 0.1% SmSrCl2 sample are higher than the other presented samples. Sm:SrCl2 exhibits a comparable LY (33,000 photons/MeV) in comparison with conventional scintillators such as Tl:NaI and Ce:Lu2SiO5, and the LYs are high enough to measure γ-rays.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cryst12040517/s1, Figure S1: X-ray fluorescence spectra of 0.1% Sm:SrCl2 sample with a tube voltage of (top) 50 kV, (middle) 30 kV, and (bottom) 15 kV.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.N. and T.Y.; methodology, D.N. and Y.F.; investigation, D.N.; resources, D.N.; data curation, D.N.; writing—original draft preparation, D.N.; writing—review and editing, T.K. and N.K.; supervision, N.K. and T.Y.; project administration, D.N.; funding acquisition, N.K. and T.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research B (19H03533, 21H03733, and 21H03736) and Early-Career Scientists (20K20104) from the Japanese Society of Applied Physics (JSPS). Foundation from Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) A-STEP (JPMJTM20FP), Cooperative Research Project of Research Center for Biomedical Engineering, Nippon Sheet Glass Foundation, SEI Group CSR Foundation, TEPCO Memorial Foundation, KRF Foundation, and Murata Science Foundation are also acknowledged.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yamamoto, S.; Okumura, S.; Kato, N.; Yeom, J.Y. Timing measurements of lutetium based scintillators combined with silicon photomultipliers for TOF-PET system. J. Instrum. 2015, 10, T09002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ishikawa, A.; Yamazaki, A.; Watanabe, K.; Yoshihashi, S.; Uritani, A.; Sakurai, Y.; Tanaka, H.; Ogawara, R.; Suda, M.; Hamano, T. Development of optical-fiber-based neutron detector using Li glass scintillator for an intense neutron field. Sens. Mater. 2020, 32, 1489–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Melcher, C.L. Scintillators for well logging applications. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 1989, 40, 1214–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Glodo, J.; Wang, Y.; Shawgo, R.; Brecher, C.; Hawrami, R.H.; Tower, J.; Shah, K.S. New Developments in Scintillators for Security Applications. Phys. Procedia 2017, 90, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Itoh, T.; Yanagida, T.; Kokubun, M.; Sato, M.; Miyawaki, R.; Makishima, K.; Takashima, T.; Tanaka, T.; Nakazawa, K.; Takahashi, T.; et al. A 1-dimensional γ-ray position sensor based on GSO:Ce scintillators coupled to a Si strip detector. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 2007, 579, 239–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Salonen, L. A rapid method for monitoring of uranium and radium in drinking water. Sci. Total Environ. 1993, 130, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shirakawa, Y. Development of a direction finding gamma-ray detector. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 2007, 263, 58–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dorenbos, P. The quest for high resolution γ-ray scintillators. Opt. Mater. X 2019, 1, 100021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kim, C.; Lee, W.; Melis, A.; Elmughrabi, A.; Lee, K.; Park, C.; Yeom, J.-Y. A Review of Inorganic Scintillation Crystals for Extreme Environments. Crystals 2021, 11, 669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kumar, V.; Luo, Z. A Review on X-ray Excited Emission Decay Dynamics in Inorganic Scintillator Materials. Photonics 2021, 8, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Weissleder, R. A clearer vision for in vivo imaging. Nat. Biotechnol. 2001, 19, 316–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Quek, C.-H.; Leong, K.W. Near-Infrared Fluorescent Nanoprobes for in Vivo Optical Imaging. Nanomaterials 2012, 2, 92–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Mijnheer, B.; Beddar, S.; Izewska, J.; Reft, C. In vivo dosimetry in external beam radiotherapy. Med. Phys. 2013, 40, 070903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Frangioni, J. In vivo near-infrared fluorescence imaging. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2003, 7, 626–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Sapre, A.A.; Novitskaya, E.; Vakharia, V.; Cota, A.; Wrasidlo, W.; Hanrahan, S.M.; Derenzo, S.; Makale, M.T.; Graeve, O.A. Optimized scintillator YAG:Pr nanoparticles for X-ray inducible photodynamic therapy. Mater. Lett. 2018, 228, 49–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Wang, H.; Lv, B.; Tang, Z.; Zhang, M.; Ge, W.; Liu, Y.; He, X.; Zhao, K.; Zheng, X.; He, M.; et al. Scintillator-Based Nanohybrids with Sacrificial Electron Prodrug for Enhanced X-ray-Induced Photodynamic Therapy. Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 5768–5774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kobayashi, M.; Kondo, K.; Hirabayashi, H.; Kurokawa, S.; Taino, M.; Yamamoto, A.; Sugimoto, S.; Yoshida, H.; Wada, T.; Nakagawa, Y.; et al. Radiation damage of BGO crystals due to low energy γ rays, high energy protons and fast neutrons. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. 1983, 206, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gurzhiev, A.N.; Turchanovich, L.K.; Vasil’chenko, V.G.; Bogatyrjov, V.A.; Mashinsky, V.M. Radiation damage in optical fibers. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 1997, 391, 417–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dai, X.; Rollin, E.; Bellerive, A.; Hargrove, C.; Sinclair, D.; Mifflin, C.; Zhang, F. Wavelength shifters for water Cherenkov detectors. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 2008, 589, 290–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Cao, X.; Jiang, S.; Jia, M.; Gunn, J.; Miao, T.; Davis, S.C.; Bruza, P.; Pogue, B.W. Observation of short wavelength infrared (SWIR) Cherenkov emission. Opt. Lett. 2018, 43, 3854–3857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kimura, H.; Kato, T.; Nakauchi, D.; Kawaguchi, N.; Yanagida, T. Radiation-induced Luminescence Properties of SrBr2 Transparent Ceramics Doped with Different Eu Concentrations. Sens. Mater. 2020, 32, 1381–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Sekine, D.; Fujimoto, Y.; Koshimizu, M.; Nakauchi, D.; Yanagida, T.; Asai, K. Photoluminescence and scintillation properties of Yb2+-doped SrCl2 crystals. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 59, 012005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mizoi, K.; Arai, M.; Fujimoto, Y.; Nakauchi, D.; Koshimizu, M.; Yanagida, T.; Asai, K. Photoluminescence and scintillation properties of Yb2+-doped SrCl2-xBrx (x = 0, 1.6, 2.0) crystals. Appl. Phys. Express 2020, 13, 112008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cherepy, N.J.; Hull, G.; Drobshoff, A.D.; Payne, S.A.; Van Loef, E.; Wilson, C.M.; Shah, K.S.; Roy, U.N.; Burger, A.; Boatner, L.A.; et al. Strontium and barium iodide high light yield scintillators. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92, 083508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Mizoi, K.; Arai, M.; Fujimoto, Y.; Nakauchi, D.; Koshimizu, M.; Yanagida, T.; Asai, K. Evaluation of photoluminescence and scintillation properties of Yb2+-doped SrCl2-xBrx crystals. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 2021, 129, 406–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. He, Z.; Wang, Y.; Li, S.; Xu, X. Dynamic studies on the time-resolved fluorescence of Sm2+ in BaCl2. J. Lumin. 2002, 97, 102–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dixie, L.C.; Edgar, A.; Reid, M.F. Sm2+ fluorescence and absorption in cubic BaCl2: Strong thermal crossover of fluorescence between 4f6 and 4f55d1 configurations. J. Lumin. 2012, 132, 2775–2782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Karbowiak, M.; Solarz, P.; Lisiecki, R.; Ryba-Romanowski, W. Optical spectra and excited state relaxation dynamics of Sm2+ ions in SrCl2, SrBr2 and SrI2 crystals. J. Lumin. 2018, 195, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dixie, L.C.; Edgar, A.; Bartle, M.C. Spectroscopic and radioluminescence properties of two bright X-ray phosphors: Strontium barium chloride doped with Eu2+ or Sm2+ ions. J. Lumin. 2014, 149, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dixie, L.C.; Edgar, A.; Bartle, C.M. Samarium doped calcium fluoride: A red scintillator and X-ray phosphor. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 2014, 753, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Awater, R.H.P.; Alekhin, M.S.; Biner, D.A.; Krämer, K.W.; Dorenbos, P. Converting SrI2:Eu2+ into a near infrared scintillator by Sm2+ co-doping. J. Lumin. 2019, 212, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wolszczak, W.; Krämer, K.W.; Dorenbos, P. CsBa2I5:Eu2+,Sm2+—The First High-Energy Resolution Black Scintillator for γ-Ray Spectroscopy. Phys. Status Solidi Rapid Res. Lett. 2019, 13, 201900158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Alekhin, M.S.; Awater, R.H.P.; Biner, D.A.; Krämer, K.W.; De Haas, J.T.M.; Dorenbos, P. Luminescence and spectroscopic properties of Sm2+ and Er3+ doped SrI2. J. Lumin. 2015, 167, 347–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Nakauchi, D.; Fujimoto, Y.; Kato, T.; Kawaguchi, N.; Yanagida, T. X- And γ-ray response of Sm-doped SrBr2 crystalline scintillators emitting red-NIR photons. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2021, 60, 092002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kanchana, V.; Vaitheeswaran, G.; Svane, A. Calculated structural, elastic and electronic properties of SrCl2. J. Alloys Compd. 2008, 455, 480–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chaminade, J.P.; Viraphong, O.; Guillen, F.; Fouassier, C.; Czirr, B. Crystal growth and optical properties of new neutron detectors Ce3+:Li6R(BO3)3 (R=Gd,Y). IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2001, 48, 1158–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yanagida, T.; Kamada, K.; Fujimoto, Y.; Yagi, H.; Yanagitani, T. Comparative study of ceramic and single crystal Ce:GAGG scintillator. Opt. Mater. 2013, 35, 2480–2485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yanagida, T.; Fujimoto, Y.; Ito, T.; Uchiyama, K.; Mori, K. Development of X-ray-induced afterglow characterization system. Appl. Phys. Express 2014, 7, 062401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Antonyak, O.T.; Chornodolskyy, Y.M.; Syrotyuk, S.V.; Gloskovska, N.V.; Gamernyk, R. V High-energy electronic excitations and radiation defects in SrCl2 crystals. Mater. Res. Express 2017, 4, 116306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yanagida, T.; Takahashi, H.; Ito, T.; Kasama, D.; Enoto, T.; Sato, M.; Hirakuri, S.; Kokubun, M.; Makishima, K.; Yanagitani, T.; et al. Evaluation of properties of YAG (Ce) ceramic scintillators. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2005, 52, 1836–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bourret-Courchesne, E.D.; Bizarri, G.A.; Borade, R.; Gundiah, G.; Samulon, E.C.; Yan, Z.; Derenzo, S.E. Crystal growth and characterization of alkali-earth halide scintillators. J. Cryst. Growth 2012, 352, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Robbins, D.J. On Predicting the Maximum Efficiency of Phosphor Systems Excited by Ionizing Radiation. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1980, 127, 2694–2702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lempicki, A.; Wojtowicz, A.J.; Berman, E. Fundamental limits of scintillator performance. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 1993, 333, 304–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Photographs of Sm:SrCl2.
Figure 1. Photographs of Sm:SrCl2.
Crystals 12 00517 g001
Figure 2. PL 3D spectrum of 0.1% Sm:SrCl2.
Figure 2. PL 3D spectrum of 0.1% Sm:SrCl2.
Crystals 12 00517 g002
Figure 3. PL decay curves of Sm:SrCl2.
Figure 3. PL decay curves of Sm:SrCl2.
Crystals 12 00517 g003
Figure 4. RL spectra of Sm:SrCl2.
Figure 4. RL spectra of Sm:SrCl2.
Crystals 12 00517 g004
Figure 5. RL decay curves of Sm:SrCl2.
Figure 5. RL decay curves of Sm:SrCl2.
Crystals 12 00517 g005
Figure 6. Pulse height spectra of 137Cs γ-rays.
Figure 6. Pulse height spectra of 137Cs γ-rays.
Crystals 12 00517 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nakauchi, D.; Fujimoto, Y.; Kato, T.; Kawaguchi, N.; Yanagida, T. Properties of Sm-Doped SrCl2 Crystalline Scintillators. Crystals 2022, 12, 517. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12040517

AMA Style

Nakauchi D, Fujimoto Y, Kato T, Kawaguchi N, Yanagida T. Properties of Sm-Doped SrCl2 Crystalline Scintillators. Crystals. 2022; 12(4):517. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12040517

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nakauchi, Daisuke, Yutaka Fujimoto, Takumi Kato, Noriaki Kawaguchi, and Takayuki Yanagida. 2022. "Properties of Sm-Doped SrCl2 Crystalline Scintillators" Crystals 12, no. 4: 517. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12040517

APA Style

Nakauchi, D., Fujimoto, Y., Kato, T., Kawaguchi, N., & Yanagida, T. (2022). Properties of Sm-Doped SrCl2 Crystalline Scintillators. Crystals, 12(4), 517. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12040517

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop